Love your content guys! You always make My day 😊😊😊❤❤❤❤

You guys almost have ALL of Napoleon's campaigns covered! You should do the French Revolutionary wars and fill in all the other gaps in Napoleon's life!

Gracias por seguir produciendo estas joyas, que para mi es el mejor canal de documentales sobre napoleón, muy por encima a muchas películas incluyendo la ultima. Espero sigan sacando mas.

Thank you for this masterpiece

@@EvilEgg331i completely agree with you on that.

I know but this doesn’t even change the fact that Giroud, a French professional footballer who plays for AC Milan, at some point this season has better goal keeper rating than Manchester United goal keeper Onana

​@@militaryjunkie6207 I am sure you don't intend posting this here.

​@@militaryjunkie6207did not expect a comment like this on a ehtv video.... go back to espn sports

Pyramids: exist napole-scott: anyway I started blasting

I feel sorry for your money you wasted at the cinema

Agreed✊🏽

They are the best

They really are the best.

Hands down the best channel on the Napoleonic wars yet. Kings & Generals is also fantastic.

Patreon

Annoying bedouins

@@eh1600 Curse them nomads! My playthroughs of that campaign would have been at least 45% less annoying and stressful if they left my rear settlements the hell alone.

shit was harder than the 1805 European campaign bro

@@ihsanyuce953 the attrition in those deserts would wipe out most of my army.

I remember that was perhaps the hardest campaign I ever played on a total war game, simply cause there was a very short time limit you had to conquer everything and reach ottoman syria. I remember when I was younger I had to replay it several times to get it right.

That was part of British propaganda

What kind of idiot goes to the cinema to learn about history

What a wasted opportunity that film was

Worst movie

Did you watch it? ​@@briandougherty384

Warsaw only because of that Girl

you mean what a warmonger?

The guy never stood quiet.

@@user-rt9kz7de1w he started only 2 wars, meanwhile the other countries made 7 coalitions

and who sold Louisiana to the US.

Today it is rare to see a leader be excellent at something

People seem to forget the victors write the history

@ does being excellent at screwing up count

@@nffclaceyAnd how did Napoleon win? Because he was a excellent general.

And that's why the story must never be told properly and with honesty. Because then the Leftoids will realize that actual history is based and awesome and thus they will abandon the communist narrative.

There was also the General Hugo which was the father of Victor Hugo, the French author of "Les Misérables" and "Notre Dame de Paris" (Quasimodo, Esmeralda, Frollo, Fébus, etc...)

I imagine if of the same name in a contemporary conflict his opposites would give him the moniker Dumb Ass.

I was surprised they didn’t mention Dumas is the father of such a famed author.

@@thibaultsardet7399So many French revolutionary officers had in turn revolutionary writers for children. Pretty cool.

they never mention a lot ,its supposed to potray napoleon as a great , good and perfect warrior ​@@ddc2957

Ya how foes it end he just leaves

Scott's movie is simply anti-French propaganda at this point : the battle of the Pyramids actually happened miles away from both the Pyramids and the Sphinx, why would Scott have Napoleon shoot at them except to make him despicable to the viewer? His whole movie is a mess.

Im hoping the Spielberg project is good.

​​@@Aspett0 Anti French only he also make anti other great power too. Not to mention even to his nation UK . Damm the Pensular War was disgraceful and best of all was Waterloo. Sharpe Waterloo with low budget yet feel better than Scott Waterloo. Wellington must rolling in his graves if he saw Scott Waterloo.

​@@Aspett0 Ohh and some reason 95th rifle now have scope before scope was even invented to use on a gun.

It's ridley scott what do you expect Pure garbage like everything eles scott had any hand in

Check out the others Napoleon wars vids so well done the narrators voice reminds me of little finger from G.o.t.

Concur.

Concur

Concur

Concur.

Concur

Egypt is out! 🙃

Also, Egypt is not part of the Napoléonic Wars.

Who is the greatest gangsta of all time? Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar, or Napoleon?

​​@@MrNiceGuyHistory Alexander

This man? This was group work.

Do you know how large the team is?@@artificialintelligence8328

​@@artificialintelligence8328Between the group, there is always a man leading. That's why people blame Ridley Scott for the disappointing Napoleon movie.

No one takes your comment seriously, anime avatar. Are you over 18? Only children watch that crap.@@shoukatsukai

A mini series would be best!

All through merit.. it's truly an epic story

Kleber would have been among the greatest. He held Egypt alone with a small force after Napoleon's departure, winning battles against all odds. Sadly he was assassinated and never made it back to France.

Yes since the campaign in Italy the list of would-be Marshals has grown considerably. A lot of what-if’s - Ducat, LaHarpe, Joubert, Dumas, Kléber, DeSaix, LaSalle.

Yes. Finally something about two of Napoleon's best commanders. In Egypt, all important battles were arranged by Desaix, as well as later the Battle of Marengo.

General Bonaparte is beyond compare to a Macedonian upstart. Only a few can compare, first among them Arthur Wellesley, First Duke of Wellington.

مسا مسا على المصريين الي هنا

@@Antonious_jeffer احلي مسا

@@Antonious_jeffer إمبابا اجمل من باريس

Kings and Generals is also up there

@@sidp5381 Yes.

And Flash point history and Invicta and Historia Civialis.

@@flashgordon6670 I tend to watch more of HistoryMarche, Invicta, House of History, and sometimes Historia Civialis. Those channels help other new UKpostsrs jump-start their own historical channel. Moreover, HistoryMarche and Invictus do very good analysis videos regarding controversial decisions, etc. Most tend to follow the narration route (like EPTV), covering one narrative by specific people (tends to not consider other potential scenarios or alternative narrations that get harshly pushed aside or erased from events due to the victors writing the history books). At least everyone has their own preferences, and channels have their own niche on UKposts. All of them are great to watch

The comparison to Hannibal is particularly apt, considering how in both wars Hannibal and Napoleon won three massive tactical victories (Trebia, Lake Trasimene, Cannae for Hannibal, and Pyramids, Mount Tabor, 1799 Aboukir for Napoleon) but only for ephemeral strategic results (control over part of Italy for Hannibal, control over Egypt for Napoleon). Both commanders were cut off, which forced them to wage war with a lack of reinforcements and support from their home country (although Hannibal _did_ receive some reinforcements, and Rome was fighting a war on multiple fronts). Both commanders were also lacking in siege equipment at crucial points in their war, which led to Napoleon's failure at Acre and convinced Hannibal against a siege of Rome. And as Napoleon was stopped at Acre, Hannibal was stopped by Roman forces at Nola, and while neither failure meant a total collapse of the French or Carthaginian position, both signaled a turning point of the war to a strategic stalemate that benefited the side that could rebuild themselves. I'd say the biggest difference between the two is the geography, with Hannibal's campaigns generally concentrated on the Italian peninsula while the French forces under Napoleon penetrated over 1,000 km inland thanks to the Nile. Hannibal also faced stronger opposition in the form of the Romans, but the terrible quality of the Ottoman forces is also somewhat exaggerated. Only six years after the French left Egypt, the British sent the Fraser expedition to conquer Egypt for themselves, only to never penetrate past the coast and get outright defeated in battle multiple times by an Egyptian force they outnumbered, suffering more losses as a raw number and as a proportion than the Egyptians, despite having naval superiority and receiving reinforcements. Hannibal also had a somewhat superior grand strategic position, with Rome facing a war on multiple fronts against an alliance of Macedon and Carthage that on paper was much larger than it (although we know that effectively, the total resources of this alliance were never properly coordinated), while Napoleon faced a coordinated effort by Britain and the Ottoman Empire.

No, God. Just God, as the poster said. @@Ccdddttt

Does Yahweh, and his dad El enjoy watching Epic History. 🤔

Well said!

Calm down, sine curve.

We're fortunate that something so addictive is also good for us!

Fascinating individual Tomas Alexandre Dumas and, as mentioned, interesting background. His father, a white French aristocrat, and mother, an enslaved African woman. Despite the appearance of then Saint-Domingue (Haiti) pre-1791 of slavery white French aristocrats or settlers often mixed or had relationships with enslaved women that resulted in mixed race children. When they had become of age, often the children's fathers would emancipate, (free) them to take over their estates or sent them to be educated in France where slavery was illegal since 1315. This system contrasts sharply with the American slavery system, where these situations would be rare and virtually unheard of.

I also can’t wait for Marengo as well.

​@@chasechristophermurraydola9314 Battle of Mount Thabor first

@@las_espannas oh okay.

@las_espannas okay, didn’t know about that one, gonna look it up, thanks!

@@davidrislund1135 a very underrated Napoleon victory.

This is a Russian channel 😅

@@AzimAskarov-xz2lg So ? It's doing justice to History all the same. Paka !

I agree, I would also add - great audio performance + voiceover.... It's what you want to listen to :)

There are also many stories of Napoleon being literally inches from death like at Toulon

I guess it was for reasons that the latin saying "Fortune favors the bold" came about.

historians are not entirely sure, there is a debate that Nelson actually let Napoleon reach Egypt. In the hope he would die there with his armee. And to get the Ottoman Empire on Britain's side.

@@bretonneux3389 Could probably be possible who knows. I often notice though. That debates on historical events tend to be comfortably looking in hindsight of history through many sources and from many sides. Meaning. It is easy to come up with theories when you already know the outcome. Being in the moment as things are happening. And being blind to all circumstances, particularly that of the enemy. Then the decision like that by Nelson would be a game of hazard. To me it sounds more like attempts to elevate his genius. Such things have been done with all historical figures. The same goes for critique as well. Experts calls something a mistake, but fail to put themselves in the position at the moment when the decision is being taken - by a person who doesn't have the luxury of being able to see into the future. As experts can look back in time and judge an outcome.

@@Tyrfingr ofc. But historians tend to have this theory, precisely because of the succession of miracles that allowed Napoleon to escape Nelson during his journey. It's such an amount of luck it becomes suspicious.

This

@@askfaisalmuslim i edited it.