I was thinking curiosity had like 2 feet tall 😂

Yea I always thought Mars rovers were small, maybe in the size of a goldern retriever until I saw one in Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum and HOLY SHIT IT IS BIG.

@@monopalisa619 the "Spirit" and "Opportunity" rovers are about the size of a small riding lawn mower, while the two current rovers ("Curiosity" and "Perseverance") are about the size of a standard sized Mini Cooper. However the Soviet Марс/Mars "rovers" had the coolest way of getting around, via a pair of "skis" and doing a leapfrog-type jump.

I didn't think the helicopter looked to scale, the blades are a meter or 1.2m so that looked off, but the rest is staggering.

I was thinking like they were the size of a rc car

This is the best part

He did the moon walk lol

I loved that detail

Sat on the wheel waiting lol

@@internetnetman6846 mars walk :)

3 months? Are you serious?😮

​@@catymiju im pretty sure he only meant designed, and not thew hole manufacturering process

@@diollinebranderson6553 It was only intended to last about 3 months, everything else was extra.

Well you are technically correct but there's a caveat to that. Opportunity and Spirit were well built, no doubt, but we thought the Martian environment and landscape would be too hostile for rovers long term which is why they gave the 90 day estimation (not to mention it was also only 90 days of funding). However it was clear as they neared the 90 day threshold that the environment was not NEARLY as hostile as first suggested and that the two rovers could last on the red planet, at least until the dust storms came. However when the first dust storms finally did come, NASA engineers were shocked that the rovers (which were put into a hibernation state) were able to reemerge almost completely unscathed and continue their journeys and research. That's why in more ways than one Spirit and Opportunity were revolutionary. Not only did they both far exceed their expected lives on Mars, they showed what rovers are capable of, design flaws to avoid in future rovers and spacecraft, just so many things. They were pioneers.

And Zhurong :(

@@user-cr6yp7vx9r the Japanese have been sending important projects into space in cooperation with others way before China did. You're not the first Asians to accomplish space goals.

@@user-cr6yp7vx9r Most developed countries have space open to them. NASA, Roscosmos, ESA, CNSA, ISRO, SpaceX, JAXA and even ISA. There are apparently tonns of capable agencies all around the world. What could be said abaout race, then I don't know what exactly wouldn't allow other than white or Asian to work for space agencies. I guess not many such people do such work...

@@user-cr6yp7vx9r India has a robust space program, as do Japan (Jaxa) and the UAE.

@@user-cr6yp7vx9r Same, I am from China so I know a lot about this, but I didn't find any evidence India was able to successfully do anything in space

Yeah, I liked the translations way to.

Agreed!

Hopefully no Mark Watneys come and pick em for parts

@Carlos Gomes I dont think he means all of them just one sent back. The rest will have to be picked up at some point. No sense littering another planet.

With the twin rovers, we could send one twin back and keep the other. Spirit and Opportunity are a perfect pair and then Curiosity and Perseverance will be eventually also be a decent match when they expire.

@@i11egitimate I mean just toss it in the cargo bay of a starship, it's not like 2 people wouldn't be able to easily lift even some of the larger probes in 1/3rd gravity, and a starship going on a return voyage 20 years from now will have plenty of room in it's cargo bay that was carrying various supplies to Mars, so I think it would be rather trivial once the essentials for a colony are already there, the only difficult part would be getting to the rover/probe and all that would take would be a cybertruck or whatever the SpaceX colonists are going to use to drive around in.

It’s been two years since his/her death😢

Didn't expect to see you here

hi jared

Hi Jared! I don’t know if you noticed but I left a comment on your video say that I love your videos and space videos you make. It’ll be cool if you made a in-depth view of how the space shuttle landed and how the crew dragon works, launches, and lands. I’m here before this comments blows up. This is has 3 likes right now.

@@PowerSerge dont think its gonna blow up

jared?!?!?!

Because he have no eyes.

That’s the new Mars walk, very similar to the Moon walk! But with less gravity!👍😂

I wonder who will actually be the first person to do the Moonwalk on Mars, lol.

when she said she likes bad boys

@@nickybritain4900 gravity on mars is greater than on the moon

that's what i was about to comnment

@@Jee-fg5wt Shouldn't we call it Marswalk then ? :/

@@mmmrqs Why?? We do the moonwalk all the time on earth, so why's it not called "Earth Walk" then?

@@danishsamir8807 You've got a good point. Makes sense :)

You know he's not real, right?

@@shivenkulshreshtha980 lol

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/epWGaI-AeqV1uYU.html

@NotAmaster China does not have social credit points. But your country definitely has. I'll know just by looking at your speech.

And of course, the people in your reply thread had to go and make things political for no reason.

@@guyman2674 yeah I know. I think you can at the same time condemn the Uyghur genocide and appreciate a beautifully designed rover.

Yeah, the real footage from Devon island was getting boring.

​@@Flyingdutchy33Another conspiracy nutz?

@@SaneGuyFr I prefer the term "Coincidence theorist"

@@Flyingdutchy33 Coincidence?

@@SaneGuyFr coincidence: 1: a remarkable concurrence of events or circumstances without apparent causal connection 2: the fact of corresponding in nature or in time of occurrence.

Eagle eyes

Did not notice at the first sight.. but I remembered this fact when I first saw the demo video released by NASA... This tiny mistake of Ingenuity has proven the genuine efforts of the animation creator. Cheers.

Good catch. No wonder i felt sth unnatural but just couldn't tell.

Good eyes

Colombo shut the

There were literally two ‘Phoenixes’ there bruh

i've said this everywhere but i'll say it again :D It looks like Wall-E with wings! its so cute XD

It looks cute

@@daretoplay8917 copy paste

It is really amazing how China made it on the first try. Every step is new. According to the insider, the chance to complete all tasks like it has done now is only about 45%. If there is anything wrong with the public available Mars data, it will fail. The success is also related to China's success with Moon landing technology.

Rip INSIGHT, Zhurong, and Ingenuity :(

well there's plans in sending humans there, (yes actual humans) possibly in the next decade at the earliest.

Ah, a modern world, humans no longer required. This is the future! And why not, robots are more efficient, never become tired or exhausted, and always make correct decisions!

There could be bacteria and other living forms living under the surface though

And a faceless dancing white Alien of course.

@@toddlerj102 No that’s just Matt Damon wearing a weird suit.

@@nickybritain4900 they dont always make correct decisions

Every one of them is several lessons learned.

But For China, no crash...one time a success, just copy other technology...no sweat!

Why most of the non-American ones crashed or failed lol

Probably it didn't showed all the other nations' spacecrafts

@@reneabrea4123 Who is "other" if all non-American ones crashed...

The best rover (along with Opportunity)

​@@EpicRobloxianReal yeah

Same it really sucks when it fails

I know. I recall when the polar lander crashed. All that work and boom, it's gone and it's not like they rebuilt it and sent another the next year.

Nearly all Russa's attempts. I don't cringe... I chuckle. Russa copies from other nations by stealing their ideas. They DO NOT put "mind-boggling" effort into anything... That's what NASA does and why they are successful Mars explorers and Russia/China are NOT.

@@locutus1126 A rare situation for NASA, very common for Russia, tho.

So do I. What pains me most is that a lot of money were spent on these projects that would later be failed😅

Marswalk

Only 14 likes for a verified commenter. What happened

@@phantomgamingignt6275 Bcs real dude won't uses Bot

Why

@@jojoramon605 what is this, the introductory banter of a quiz show?

Thankfully I wasn't wondering that.

The Asians stuff breaks in space on purpose anyway

Cool and great to know. I bet the Chinese are looking up our names and the parts we uses. They will get stumped when the part says NAPA.

Just another fun fact, in the Chinese language we call Mars _火星_ (HuoXing), which literally means "Fire Planet".

@@GensoLight hey thanks!

Interesting, I have thought it is a cookie box.

@@blakespower its a joke

@@pedroks7756 It was dyslexia.

@@pedroks7756oh is it a MEME? yeah I hate MEMES just stupid people on the internet repeating the same thing like morons

@@blakespower your shoulders must always be in pain because of the weight of all that knowledge

Agree!

CNSA already has rich experiences of Moon landers and rovers in the past decade, which allows them to build rover in such size for their first attempt.

I thought it was much smaller

I don't care.Embrace our microwave rover Sorjourner.

@@user-mh4kh4tm9uWish Korea can make a big one

ikr

and the person is 6 ft tall

Right? Curiosity and Perseverance are BIG BOIS.

"Curiosity is about the size of a small SUV." -NASA's website

On the bright side, the Russians are the only one to land a space craft and take real images on the surface of Venus

@@kibb4667 Perhaps it's better that way.........everyone gets to experience the journey and the space program from their comfortable arm chair, as not everybody wants to be a space man or be blown to bits with a failed space vehicle, but they can get the same experience seeing the destination when it happens. This is very much like seeing a video of a deep sea remote operating vehicle going around the remains of the Titanic that nobody will ever see again once it completely rusts away.

Autonomous breaking in mars atmosphere is hard.

@@kibb4667 the Soviets/Russians had a monopoly on Venus in the same manner that we have a monopoly on Mercury, Mars, and the Outer Solar System. What allowed them to be able to perform such a feat was using the data collected by their earlier Venera spacecraft and our Mariner 2 and Mariner 5 missions and build a pressure vessel capable of withstanding the heat (via active helium cooling) and pressure. Also, Venus' atmosphere is thicker than Earth's so there was no need to add rockets for the descent; only three temperature-resistant parachutes (two to ensure an intact landing) was all they needed, whereas with Mars, a parachute is used, but that parachute would be the equivalent of the "drogue chutes" used to stabilize the U.S. Mercury, Gemini, Apollo, and Crew Dragon manned spacecraft, and well as all Soviet/Russian and Chinese manned spacecraft.

Imagine the expense and the dashed hopes of those people involved with crashed vehicles.

One of my most favourite movies........The Martian, got it on DVD.

He was especially Oscar worthy in his small role in the movie Team America World Police.

Ha ha ha ha! Nice!

To cancle the rotational momentum created by the first blade But both the plates creates thrust due to different pitches !!! ✌🏻

@@shraddhamankar7985 Actrually this momentum is so called "Yaw momentum"

@@ricardoz5714 also,..... angular momentum 😅✌🏻

Freedom units failed to spread Capitalism to Mars. To anyone who will become salty over this chill it’s just a joke.

Butterflies are very important mythical figures in China.

@@lampoilropebombs0640 then it will not surprising if they build dragon-shaped next

Wall-E with wings 😂

@@Not_MissHina CNSA: good idea!

Hope phillipines does one too, PHILSA isn't really supported by the government here:(

It looks like we are dumping/depositing more spent rubbish on/in the nearest place available. I thought Fly tipping was illegal! I can’t see the point in discovering rocks and sand on Mars, maybe there’s water, maybe there’s not! Other planets may have rocks and sand too, or maybe not! So what?

India also >:(

@@kibb4667 Phillipines 🤢🤮🤣🤣

Europe sends its rover next year.

Let's name the next one "Personality"...

...and the robots there.. don't care ...that there's never going to be any scope for rainfall ..not ever....nice they won't get suffocated...!!

Who else is gonna wipe off the dust from their solar panels

I just love the image of this one humanoid who’s been bored and lonely on Mars when, all of a sudden, he’s got new pets to monitor and take care of.

He's the cameraman.

@@megabeam atleast he doesn't nees to wipe of the dust of the chinese rover

im with curiosity

Your comment is also full of mistakes. For example, the word you were.looking for was uncontrollable. Funny, though, that NASA technology is so advanced they can make phone calls to the moon in the 60s, and they can control robots on mars, yet i lose all reception at the lake. *YOU ARE BEING DECEIVED.*

iHillHillHillHillHillHìIiKHALIHillHillHillHillHillHillHillHillHillHille💞💞💞💞💞💞💞💞💞💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤💘💘💘💘💘💘💘💘💘💘💘💘💘💘💘💘💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓☝☝☝☝☝☝☝☝☝☝☝☝☝☝☝☝☝☝👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍✋✋✋✋✋✋✋✋👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊👊👊👊👊👊👊👊👊👊👊!HillKHHilliHillHillHillHillHillHillHill

HillHìIiHillHillHillHillHillHillHillHillHillHillHillHill

@@darnellpistachio2991 If it was deceived and so called "Fake" why do so many country's do the same thing as NASA, china, japan, Taiwan, SpaceX. If anything you are being deceived

@@darnellpistachio2991 another sofa scientist who knows next to nothing apparently

Thank you!

Yeah, by 2180

Lmfao

我完全同意！

I agree even though I didn't understand what you said

@@sensora194 It roughly means "This animation is too good to be true! can't believe it's made by a channel that only has 20k subscribers"

@Jamie Logan It says this video has less views than the reposted one on BiliBili (1.1M now)

确实做得好，而且最后把祝融号驶到面前而显得更大。我们的目标是星辰大海！

Lets go

Wow I loved your performance in the Martian

@@oberonpanopticon thank you

Thank you Alex!

Get used to it bc we will never have actual unedited video of anything beyond "low earth orbit"... its 2021 and we still cannot get an actual photograph of the earth from space that isn't cgi or composite images.. $56 mil a day is wasted on cartoons

@@mrsam9206 Except for all the ones we have.

@@deepspacecourier I love how Terraplanist just come to space videos all sharing the same speech... No research, no logic, no facts.

@@garethhanby Type in images from space into google and find a pic that isn't cgi... then go to the nasa website and read all the fine print under each "photo" it will tell you that these pictures are not real photos but cgi composite images... Do not take my word do your own research

I have a feeling there are either very angry or very stupid people (or both) that just spend their time going from video to video giving a thumbs down to every one. They might even have a bot that does this.

Or maybe they think the information is bologna! The only thing that has been to space is your imagination...

flat earthers possibly, but there are people who go around and dislike videos that have more likes than dislikes to "balance things"

those would be the flat brainers...

@@FredPlanatia You do realize your watching cgi cartoons right??

Same, as well as Opportunity

commie !!!!!!!

@@kitkat47chrysalis95 And? What u gonna do about it? 😈

@@kitkat47chrysalis95 Yes, I am. I want to see an end to poverty and mass democracy in society. I want you to not be exploited for profit.

@@ThomasTarrants we need someone like Macarthur in the whitehouse, commies are everywhere and they need to be purged

@@kitkat47chrysalis95 I just want you to take a moment and step back. I've been nothing but kind to you and in return you're calling for mass killings. Do you really think you're doing something beneficial here?

Landers yes, but there was the Mars Observer in 1992, an orbiter that failed I think on reaching Mars and the Soviet 1989 Phobos 2 mission - which was to land two landers on Phobos but again, largely was a failure. It sent back pictures on reaching Phobos at least and other data beforehand.

@@distantthunder12ck55 yeah I eas commenting about that part above. They had a picture of a cigar shaped object which supposedly 'killed' their probe.

@Chrispy I think it was that partly and NASA concentrating on the shuttle program after 1976. Also, after Viking interest waned because of the supposedly negative life search results and the lack of even organics in the soil. Most scientists labelled Mars as a dry, waterless, dead, lifeless world without even basic, organic chemistry. That turned public interest away too.

@@distantthunder12ck55 I think if a mini dome was sent to Mars that had a full integral life support system for plant life and an in built water supply it would be able to grow plants.....then that would be something to observe from the various Mars craft that are doing nothing really important at the moment apart from analysing the soil types.

@@distantthunder12ck55 There were also a few successful orbital missions like the Mars Global Surveyor.

Yep

Overused and unfunny joke

The jump would be from a mini-cooper size to a 13 story building.

A 13-14 story behemoth would DEFINITELY dwarf these robots 😂

​@@momentary_that's one big mini Cooper

Fr. Perseverance is cool but its overrated and the spotlight is no longer on Oppy and Curiosity.