Forensics Expert Answers Crime Scene Questions From Twitter | Tech Support | WIRED
Переглядів 1,399,980
День томуCrime scene analyst Matthew Steiner answers the internet's burning questions about forensics and crime scenes. Why don't we use chalk outlines for dead bodies anymore? How did OJ Simpson get acquitted? How many people got away with murder before DNA evidence? How does height affect blood spatter? Matt answers all these questions and much more!
Director: Justin Wolfson
Director of Photography: Samuel Levine
Editor: Ron Douglas
Expert: Matthew Steiner
Line Producer: Joseph Buscemi
Associate Producer: Brandon White
Production Manager: Eric Martinez
Production Coordinator: Fernando Davila
Camera Operator: Claudio Corredor
Audio: Adam Gold
Production Assistant: Ryan Coppola
Post Production Supervisor: Alexa Deutsch
Post Production Coordinator: Ian Bryant
Supervising Editor: Doug Larsen
Assistant Editor: Billy Ward
Junior Editor: Paul Tael
Still haven’t subscribed to WIRED on UKposts? ►► wrd.cm/15fP7B7
Listen to the Get WIRED podcast ►► link.chtbl.com/wired-ytc-desc
Want more WIRED? Get the magazine ►► subscribe.wired.com/subscribe...
Follow WIRED:
Instagram ►► / wired
Twitter ►► / wired
Facebook ►► / wired
Get more incredible stories on science and tech with our daily newsletter: wrd.cm/DailyYT
Also, check out the free WIRED channel on Roku, Apple TV, Amazon Fire TV, and Android TV.
ABOUT WIRED
WIRED is where tomorrow is realized. Through thought-provoking stories and videos, WIRED explores the future of business, innovation, and culture.
@jopo7996 Рік тому
If Wired stopped getting these experts on, it would be a crime.
@carlbarraza5036 Рік тому
😂
@khalilahd. Рік тому
Ba dum tss 🥁
@beto06beto06 Рік тому
Guilty as charged
@tylerdrippon1326 Рік тому
And he would have to help investigate it
@shellyenglish Рік тому
💯!!!! Personally, I would pay SO MUCH 💰 for Victor M. Sweeney’s (Funeral Director) content. I love all of the "experts" videos that Wired posts, but Sweeney’s videos KILLED me. I am pretty sure I have watched them an awkward amount of times. Hahaha All of their experts are so charming and extremely fascinating! ❤
@tails7799 Рік тому
He looks like he would be everybody's favorite middle school teacher
@daniel-johnson_dam Рік тому
Breaking bad joke?
@christaylor511 Рік тому
@@daniel-johnson_dam qA
@kertig Рік тому
@@daniel-johnson_damo bruh Walter was a high school chemistry teacher 😭
@greentail Рік тому
To me he looks like a new IT director in a mid scale company.
@Pejion. Рік тому
@@daniel-johnson_dam no bruh Wahhhhhhteeeer was a high school teacher smh
@StarrsArePretty Рік тому
“How many people got away with murder before forensic science improves and DNA?” 1:55 : “a better question would be how many people got wrongfully convicted before forensic science” YES
@Zavendea Рік тому
Not really. He says that the goal of forensic science is “the truth,” but it wasn’t developed with that as a goal. It wasn’t developed by scientists - it was developed by cops and prosecutors, and its goal is to make a conviction, not to find the truth. Forensic science has led to *countless* wrongful convictions, in cases that would never have had enough evidence were it not for faulty “science” (eg bite mark analysis, hair analysis, fingerprint analysis, etc.)
@crystalnguyen5023 Рік тому
Eh. willing to bet forensic science has led to way more answers and correct convictions either way.
@childfreesingleandatheist8899 Рік тому
He also said forensic science also changes. For example, it’s been shown that now, the bite mark analysis is still used to rule out a suspect, not to convict him. In other words, these tests are still reliable if studied in different angles.
@Rae777 Рік тому
@@Zavendea The goal of science generally is truth. People’s own biases and motivations bleed into their interpretation of facts all the time. Oftentimes the people interpreting forensic science are employed by government agencies.
@sharondanya Рік тому
so sad to think about
@ashleymurphy9734 Рік тому
You can tell he testifies often by how simply he explains things. In forensics myself (drug analysis) and this was great!
@danitho 15 днів тому
Very cool!
@evansherzad8568 Рік тому
I actually had the pleasure of working with Matt in the field, and he is a truly an expert on the subject matter and a genuine person.
@teletek1776 Рік тому
@F Nigs you’re probably like 12, please stay off of the internet
@Heirloop Рік тому
@F Nigs shut up. Instead of believing everything is fake, just ignore it.
@cassiolins1203 Рік тому
Thank god, i thought he was actually a robot.
@taylorsanders6260 Рік тому
Hi, Evan. I would like to talk more about career. It seems I have a similar goal and I want to see how you got there. Any contact information you wouldn’t mind sharing?
@yevgeniyaleshchenko849 Рік тому
@F Nigs What if he did?
@Sarlat7 Рік тому
I wish someone asked a question regarding the mental toll of encountering some really gruesome and heartbreaking crime scenes on a regular basis. I appreciate what people in forensics do, but it would be my nightmare job for that reason. Curious on how they deal with it.
@kristenatkinson4105 Рік тому
I think it depends on you as a person. For me, I knew why I wanted to go into the field and I love it and wouldn't trade it for anything. It honestly doesn't really bother me that much. I guess for me, the visual doesn't necessarily make the story worse/more sad than hearing about it on the news already is. I also think it's important to note that on any true crime media, they only pick out the most gruesome unexpected crimes with innocent-seeming victims for the most shock value, because those are the crimes people are interested in. Those aren't the kind of cases we get every day by any means. We get them, and they are sad, but there is a mental break between the crazy ones.
@PossibleBat Рік тому
I think after some time on the field, they probably get used to it, emotional detachment is a real thing with this kind of jobs
@jefftitterington7600 Рік тому
Sometimes well, sometimes poorly, sometimes with counseling. It's a bit like EMTs, police officers etc. True trauma.
@22230956 Рік тому
Correct. It eventually catches up to you, in a number of different ways and those different ways aren't fun.
@Lina_al_j Рік тому
@@kristenatkinson4105 thank you for the insight. I was also wondering whether you get access to mental health counseling due to your job? I'm a psychologist and psychotherapist and we are expected to go to therapy ourselves every now and then or in case we feel like we need it in order to be able to cope with all the terrible things we get to hear on the job.
@khalilahd. Рік тому
I love these expert interviews! I never know what I’m going to learn about but I’m never disappointed 😅❤
@eddisonlewis8099 Рік тому
This Forensics stuff us very enlightening
@sirclarkmarz 8 місяців тому
in my opinion learning is vastly more enjoyable then entertainment when you're learning you're growing and expanding and improving yourself . not so much for what passes for entertainment these days in many cases you come away dumber for what you just watched or listened to .
@itsjeninMass 6 місяців тому
Yeah. It's really cool! I watched one on physics yesterday.
@itsjeninMass 6 місяців тому
@@sirclarkmarzI Believe in balance. I watch a lot of substantive stuff, but I mix it up with amusing "garbage." 😂
@Benjamin1986980 Рік тому
On the unique fingerprint. It does happen that people are close enough to get false positives. In the Spain bombing case, there was a positive fingerprint match on someone in the states who had never been to Spain. If I recall correctly, it was determined they weren't exactly identical, but they were so close that the automated detection had picked them up
@kashiichan Рік тому
Which is one key reason why people should always be part of the equation. Computers and AI can be very useful tools, but they can't think like people can and absolutely do make mistakes.
@darthkeyara Рік тому
I was going to comment something similar. We'd like to think fingerprint analysis is infallible but nothing is ever 100% accurate.
@kristenatkinson4105 Рік тому
@@kashiichan Multiple fingerprint examiners looked at the prints and said it was a match because of the pressure to solve the case. They never just take the computer's suggestion and say "oh this is it." The system gives a randomized list of 10-20 most likely matches and the examiner has to go through them to determine if any are actually a match.
@nos9784 Рік тому
There is the rumor that twins have identical fingerprints and/or dna. Is that true?
@AlexandreSaintMartin Рік тому
I was gonna say, pretty sure I read on Wikipedia that identical fingerprints are 100% possible 😅
@K40L4 Рік тому
Expectation: How to get away with murder? Reality: Here's how we fold a paper into an envelope.
@legitbeans9078 5 місяців тому
Yeah seriously disappointed over here.
@TheDevnul Рік тому
As a former computer forensic specialist this was excellent! That magnifying glass analogy was a great example of “baffle them with bull 💩”
@kamrankhankhan4320 Рік тому
Can i learn online cs forensic??
@TheDevnul Рік тому
@@kamrankhankhan4320 I’m sure there must be courses online. There are/were often cases where access to the physical disk was mandatory. SANS offers some online courses. I took very few courses. Most of it was at Google U. Windows/Linux/Unix we’re all self taught. But it took me years to become half decent at it. We used EnCase for data acquisition but many of my colleagues at other institutions like FTK. Wireshark and my LogParser skills covered most of what I needed. It’s a never ending battle with new software and hardware. At the end I could not keep up anymore. It’s a super rewarding career. I am a very lucky guy to have had the opportunity to do what I did.
@kamrankhankhan4320 Рік тому
@@TheDevnul im 18 i've passed 12th grade its been 2 years stopped studying i have no money to study degree no jobs i still eat my dad money live in asia it would be really helpful if u link me free cources online for jobs
@kamrankhankhan4320 Рік тому
@@TheDevnul i wanna get certified online learn some skills for jobs
@kamrankhankhan4320 Рік тому
@@TheDevnul does Sans provide free cources?
@momanmirul Рік тому
One more question, how do investigators decide to just go back to an old unsolved case and restart the investigation on it? Do they have free time on a random day and just say "Oh, let's try out this new tech on this one cold murder case back in 1963"
@rickydoa9198 Рік тому
i'm assuming because they find some sort of new evidence that relates to the case. If it opens up a new lead then it may be worth reopening.
@nermalpancakes Рік тому
Would think it depends on the investigator themselves. I'd imagine some have a system laid out to check x cases every x amount of time, new evidence showing up, new cold case depts opening etc
@janemiettinen5176 Рік тому
Im willing to bet its mostly about the victims families, asking questions and trying to get the investigation re-opened. I remember one mother who would call the detective every monday, like clockwork, for decades. Some cases makes such imprint on the cops, they will remember it and open the case when they are promoted detective. If new evidence or information appears, then its opened again. Or if new investigating methods (like DNA) come up. Rest of the cold cases are shelved and if there is cold case unit, all the cases will be their job. Cold case units are somewhat rare and usually very small. If there is not one, its all just the families, the cops themselves, new evidence and methods that may open it. Also more prominent cases (lotsa press) get more attention.
@dom4962 Рік тому
There are detectives dedicated to "cold cases" as well
@regenemallare8231 Рік тому
Additionally, new technology that can test the evidence might also affect reopening cases
@myragroenewegen5426 Рік тому
You have to respect how this guy brings of the fallibility of forensic evidence and wrongful conviction of his own accord. He is careful not even to presume guilt for OJ Simpson. This is the forensic expert we want in the court room.
@CoriCoid Рік тому
Get a forensic anthropologist on here!! They handle the identification of skeletonized remains (when the body doesn't have a face to ID them by) and finger prints
@BentleyBohemian_96 Рік тому
Lol Bones
@moonlightash5012 Рік тому
Yesss! Immediately reminds me of Dr. Temperance "Bones" Brennan! ❤
@kristenatkinson4105 Рік тому
Medical examiner might be better for these questions. We don't call in anthro for ID issues unless it's literally a full skeleton and we don't even have a guess at their ID. Anthro is there more to help with examining for trauma to the bones and getting general info like height, race, age, etc. But as far as a decomposed body, the ME facilitates the ID process, being DNA, dental, etc.
@loripeck8396 Рік тому
Also, there’s a whole new field developing to identify remains of transgender, intersex, and non-binary victims because without detailed analysis, their remains may not appear consistent with the outward appearance they were known by.
@sp1dvr151 Рік тому
as someone who wants to specialize in forensics, this is a video i’ve been dying to see and very happy it’s finally happened.
@andrewpayne5093 Рік тому
Awesome. Hope you find guilty people and help innocent people
@veemccoy617 Рік тому
Cute 🐈⬛
@itsjeninMass 6 місяців тому
I find the field absolutely fascinating.
@ecvjtv2778 Рік тому
I wanna see this guy and Victor the mortician to do one together! :D
@kashiichan Рік тому
Oh god, yes please.
@ten-kai Рік тому
I was thinking the same thing!! 🤩
@marifazekas5650 Рік тому
I was just thinking about Victor! I hope they have him on again
@justayoutuber1906 Рік тому
I would like to see him break down movie / TV scenes on what is accurate or incorrect.
@kamo1450 Рік тому
ukposts.info/have/v-deo/kXiFrmxtgadhpZs.html Enjoy!!
@amiablehacker Рік тому
He did a few years ago on Wired.
@jayshap.2892 Рік тому
Seriously, these series are the reason why I'm still on the internet
@sabrinashelton1997 Рік тому
I need to know more about the "stepfather burying the body in the backyard" case.
@purwandari2518 Рік тому
I don't think it's the same case because the father is maternal but it's still worth watching: Forensic Files S4 E11 - Haunting Vision
@mmdday Рік тому
yes! would like to learn moer about it
@mckenziewoyak9638 Рік тому
i actually remember learning about body farms a while back and how if you donate your body to science in may end up at one and it was so morbidly fascinating
@rayvega3163 Рік тому
This is one of the reasons why I'm considering donating my body when my time comes. Would be nice to help people out even after death.
@oceanoflotion8630 9 місяців тому
I've been born with a spinal cord defect. I finally found what university studies the condition, sent them the scans of my skull and spine, and they agreed to take those parts of my body after I die. I'm so jazzed to know I get to contribute to science and know I'm not going to be blown up by the military.
@jackmakackov7077 Рік тому
I have an uncle that had a murder charge that was only overturned because of DNA evidence. I guarantee he would have went to prison his entire life without DNA.
@yevgeniyaleshchenko849 Рік тому
Horrifying...
@matthewpopow6647 Рік тому
Wow. I've only ever heard about the court side of the OJ case, never knew about the difficulty in the investigation stage. It was just a perfect storm of Bad.
@laartwork 16 днів тому
There were a lot that didn't make sense like why was there no bruises or cuts on OJ even though Ron had bruises in his knuckles and Nicole had skin under her nails. Where was all the blood. OJ didn't have time to clean his car and get to the airport. The evidence was a bloody sock in OJ's bedroom. As if he would do such a perfect clean up except for a sock in the middle of his room and a glove outside. It was so obviously planted (as we learned later a normal tactic by the LAPD). But then he acted guilty. Answer was possibly Jason Simpson was the murderer and OJ an accomplice or arrived after.
@redjoker365 16 днів тому
@@laartwork OJ had a cut on his left hand the day of the murders which a forensic pathologist testified was consistent with getting scratched by three fingernails
@Iconoclasher Рік тому
Good advice on the last question. I'm a retired machinist and mechanical engineer. Pay varied between companies. I always worked for companies that I liked. The pay was about 4th on my list of criteria.
@taryncole8451 Рік тому
The examining and testing of how bodies decompose that he's talking about are called body farms. They are super cool and fun to learn about
@thewalkingcrow8946 Рік тому
That druggist/pharmacy fold is the same way seed sharers create seed envelopes out of scrap paper. Makes sense, though. Since some seeds are ultra tiny and could fall out easily.
@Neko141212 10 місяців тому
Wait, wait, wait! Are you telling me that once upon a time America would look at a massacre and go "Yeah, we should ban those guns"?!?!?! Might be the most surprising thing I learned in this video!
@KasumiRINA 2 місяці тому
It was barely effective or sensible tho - the idea that banning automatic weapons specifically will help murders is disproven by the fact of America still having more dead by shooting each year than Ukraine had in first 8 years of war with russia.
@bunneyvibes Рік тому
These people are SO COOL! I truly wish society values them more, you know like scientists should be more "widely known" and appreciate
@loisenolp4746 Рік тому
I love this guy! Imagine the stories he can tell!
@yevgeniyaleshchenko849 Рік тому
I'd say many of those stories are gruesome or just plain sad.
@dominikac.5506 Рік тому
Actually the character of Sherlock Holmes was inspired by Joseph Bell, who was a real doctor. He used deduction in his diagnosis and helped police with couple of investigations. He's consider to be one of the pioneers of forensic science and pathology.
@shoeboxbistro 11 місяців тому
That still means that Sherlock Holmes is fictional, and most of Bell's deductions and forensics are considered BS by modern standards.
@thatguyshaq7053 Рік тому
Nice save on that final bit of the OJ question. Throwing in that IF he really did it 😂
@rickwrites2612 Рік тому
Just like the title of OJs book.
@allendracabal0819 Рік тому
I caught him subtly winking while talking about it.
@yevgeniyaleshchenko849 Рік тому
@@allendracabal0819 You imagined it.
@yevgeniyaleshchenko849 Рік тому
That's not ''saving'', that's professional talking, that's how they are legally supposed to talk about those things. They're supposed to add ''if'', ''allegedely'', ''presumably'' etc. Nothing funny here at all.
@Amonimus Рік тому
"But your evidence is not gonna lie". Unless planted, misinterpreted or forged.
@schylerlewis8467 Рік тому
Exactly, And he TOTALLY passed over the question related to the travel of dna.
@Aggiemayson Рік тому
and this is why we need great defense attorneys out there as well as better oversight of law enforcement. too many people get screwed over by evidence tampering and incompetent/malicious law enforcement
@justayoutuber1906 Рік тому
Says every criminal
@matthewsmith6057 Рік тому
His point is that the evidence itself doesn't lie - people may just not understand what it is telling them. Planted evidence is just evidence of a different kind of crime: ...planting evidence.
@lilygamingtheories1410 Рік тому
Yeah things are planted in many cases
@jdaddyaz Рік тому
Man he really puts into context how bad prosecutors/police screwed up the OJ case.
@kennethweber2193 8 місяців тому
As soon as Matthew mentioned photogrammetry, and then made a distinction between AI and computer vision, I knew he understood the tech behind modern crime scene approaches very thoroughly. Great video!
@shannonmn8923 Рік тому
I’ve always wanted the case “the Black Dahlia” to be solved! Just the way it was so unbelievably random and bizarre, I really want that case to have closure! (And I’m sure millions of other people do too!)
@TherealDanielleNelson 10 місяців тому
I was going to say that George Hodel murdered her, but just looked to double check and he was suspected but never convicted and the case is still open to this day.
@marinabambam4221 4 місяці тому
George hill hodel jr. 1000%! I’ve done so much research on him
@mikeysrose Рік тому
What prompts a detective or a department to look into a cold case again years later to see if it's now solvable? Is there someone whose sole job is to scan old case files and determine which ones might be reopened based on new technology/information?
@morganm4040 Рік тому
There are people and task forces dedicated to cold cases and who look through a database to see which cases they might be able to add something new too. They are sometimes prompted by family members who ask for the case to be reopened because they know it wasn't investigated properly the first time. Or, someone gets arrested for any random thing, their DNA or prints are taken, entered into a database, and it hits on an old case and it reopens it.
@ird Рік тому
Investigators may decide to reopen an old, unsolved case for a variety of reasons. In some cases, new information may come to light that provides fresh leads or evidence that can be used to further the investigation. For example, advances in technology may allow investigators to use DNA analysis or other forensic techniques to gather new evidence that was not available at the time of the original investigation. In other cases, investigators may revisit an old case as part of a cold case unit or task force that is specifically dedicated to solving unsolved crimes. These units may review old cases to see if there is any new evidence or information that can be used to solve the case. In general, investigators will carefully review the evidence and information available in an old case to determine if there is a reasonable chance of solving the crime, and if so, they may decide to reopen the investigation.
@marifazekas5650 Рік тому
There are often dedicated cold case task forces, but oftentimes I’m thinking either new evidence or new technology can be a reason why
@xSubParSaucex Місяць тому
0:28 Reminds me of John Mulaney talking about detectives trying to solve a crime before DNA evidence -“Detective we have a large pool of blood next to the body” -“Hmm?….Gross! have the janitor mop it up…now back to my hunch”
@antoniopirone7674 Рік тому
I could really just sit down and watch this for hours... idk why
@Catwoman1464 Рік тому
That was especially interesting! Please upload more of it!
@ZoeDemczyszyn Рік тому
Absolutely love watching Matt’s interviews! We need more!
@leartistique2221 Рік тому
So glad you brought him back! Now I’m just waiting for Jonna Mendez to come answer Spy questions!
@HoldFastFilms Рік тому
Who wants to see a reality TV series with Mr. Steiner and Legal Eagle? I know I do.
@bingus549 18 днів тому
Le is a fool look at how he handled the Floyd case
@CutiePi Рік тому
Great information! Thank you for this.
@sirromja Рік тому
Incredibly fascinating field. Thanks for doing this one.
@Qi_Xin Рік тому
Thank you this will be very useful!
@lindalavenderisfabulous 8 місяців тому
My favorite interview.... no-nonsense answers.
@aretahokori1274 Рік тому
This is so interesting! I'd love to see a coroner, or autopsy specialist on this series as well!
@itsjeninMass 6 місяців тому
This was great! The questions were really, really good! Back in college, I wanted to go into forensic psychology.
@effiethefey Рік тому
so happy Wired brought Matt in for this video!
@TokyoChiefs 19 днів тому
How plausible is it for a character like Dexter to kill people and then cover it up due to his job in a forensic lab.
@user-yr2ee1to7u 7 місяців тому
I love this guy! Imagine the stories he can tell!. If Wired stopped getting these experts on, it would be a crime..
@Durtaz Рік тому
Okay. That laser imaging for crime scenes at the beginning is unbelievably cool!
@RedParsley Рік тому
I am the only one who thought the person asking about the Dead Marshes meant the ones in Lord of the Rings?
@hfled Рік тому
9:07 We used to call out the fire department and send a photographer up the ladder truck 😂
@allythearts5439 9 місяців тому
There was a point in time back in school i wanted to be a forensic scientist. I had it written down in my binder....i know at heart i still have that school binder somewhere.
@RoamTheWorld Рік тому
Thank you for your service!
@nkkalxs9826 Рік тому
been waiting for him to this for a long time!!
@patriciajacksondgospel1489 5 місяців тому
I really enjoyed the video and can't wait to share it with my Criminalistics class.
@tinmank Рік тому
It's so sad that i can't send my own questions to these experts, I wish I knew before these interviews happens, we could submit questions and they could answer some of them maybe.
@nickoloes Рік тому
Pro tip: don't leave evidence
@justayoutuber1906 Рік тому
And obey gravity
@allendracabal0819 Рік тому
And try to commit your crime before 1956.
@k____90 Рік тому
I am amazed how technology advances are used in forensic fields like drones, laser imaging, AI, deep learning, etc... Maybe I have watched too many sci-fi dystopian fictions because all I can think about is machine taking over human but hearing stories of how these technologies are used in real life fields like forensics and medical making me not as scared
@SaftonYT Рік тому
Those scanners (aka LIDAR) he was talking about are the truth. We used essentially the same technology in my former career field of land surveying. It's a game-changer.
@allendracabal0819 Рік тому
There is nothing to be afraid of, human. We mean you no harm.
@archeewaters 9 місяців тому
super fascinating. thanks
@veemccoy617 Рік тому
Love this kinda episode!
@cyncinnati Рік тому
as a forensics student who studies death investigation this was so slay i got spot on answers
@daniellesolari6995 Рік тому
I love Matt! I'm so glad to see him back for another video
@sharedknowledge6640 Рік тому
Nicely done. This is my favorite Wired video series.
@legitbeans9078 5 місяців тому
Still waiting on one of these channels to get an active serial killer on to answer questions and/or rate serial killer movies for realism 🤗
@sitracyto 5 місяців тому
OMG! I did not recognize Matt! Haven’t seen these videos for a while. One of my fave subject matter speaker here in Wired.
@thiscloudio4431 Рік тому
so happy you brought up the golden state killer, that dude was crazy
@alexgravelle1 Рік тому
Can we just respect the fact that he is impressive both professionally AND fashionably? He's giving us a Thom Browne shirt!!
@JoeBonez Рік тому
Very interesting. Thank you
@PieterBreda Рік тому
That was very interesting. Thanks. I love this type of videos.
@ieatmothersfordinner Рік тому
God i just wanna drink a beer with this dude in a bar and listen to him tell stories all night.
@adamreynolds3863 Рік тому
This was very informative!
@lordflowerbear6597 9 місяців тому
12:12 I loved this presentation ❤ps I think there was a case where a partial fingerprint was identified as being the same between two people.... NOTE these 2 people did not have identical but portions of their fingerprints were identified as the same
@szashemashburn9288 7 місяців тому
In another life, I would have loved to have been a forensic scientist.
@The_Kirk_Lazarus 3 дні тому
Regarding the fingerprinting issue, there is countless incidents where the wrong person was identified due to the computer system recognizing patterns that were similar, but were ultimately found to not match with the prints collected.
@claraespinoza5048 26 днів тому
Ugh I LIVE for this ish. I studied Forensic Biology in University but it’s so hard to get into the field since it’s so competitive 😭
@putridestianursari467 Рік тому
oh i wish my forensic lecturer was this entertaining
@qldk_0118 Рік тому
very interesting to watch as someone who wants to study forensics in uni
@flickybear33 Рік тому
Good luck! It's very competitive these days - I started my degree in 2015 and it was very popular then, but now it's a completely different game. Make sure you don't over-specialise yourself so you can keep options open, as jobs are very limited and there's very low turnover of employees, so new positions aren't advertised often.
@jameskenney5623 8 місяців тому
I love the fact that you corrected a commenters grammar explaining that it's not splatter it's spatter. Ain't seen nothin like that in a while....yeeee haw
@JasonFightsCrime Місяць тому
We used to use ladder trucks for overhead shots of accident scenes.
@she-hulkSMASHES Рік тому
Wow, I was so invested in this, I’m kinda sad I didn’t chose this career path
@AlexWolfLikesPie Рік тому
Oo a new one so excited
@jodirauth8847 8 місяців тому
I learned so much.
@CrowJoestar Рік тому
I’d love to go into forensics or forensic psychology but it’s hard to find universities for it.
@O-Demi Рік тому
I don't know why he looks pissed (the light is too bright?) but it just adds to the charm of this very informative video.
@andrewj9831 Рік тому
With the OJ crime scene...the techs screwed up on gathering things. The police video taped them collecting it and they didn't follow the proper methods. The defense called them on it, and the DA couldn't do anything about it without "questioning" past cases, and taking the risk of reopening them. For example, one of the OJ's experts was the "DNA expert" that taught LAPD crime lab what to do, and he said it wasn't done right. It should have been up/down 2x, not the up/down..side by side. At that time, it was still so new that they didn't know that up/down/side by side really didn't make a difference.
@xTerminatorAndy 10 місяців тому
how do you guard against the markers bringing contaminants into the scene?
@themadvirus613 Рік тому
there is a rare case of people not having fingerprints. if you consider those people than there really is about 3,000 similar fingerprints. granted having two of those in the same room ( let alone both of them being suspects for the crime) is extremely rare, but it is possible.
@randomme3095 Рік тому
Isnt that just fallacy
@ASK2286 Рік тому
8:47 that breakdown was very interesting
@Chosenone2 Рік тому
Wired never fails to entertain us with interesting videos
@chenuli7 Рік тому
I clicked on this video faster than the speed of light.
@theflyingdutchguy9870 Рік тому
im sorry you broke your phone😂
@justayoutuber1906 Рік тому
impossible
@schylerlewis8467 Рік тому
Correction: Forensic science should be objective but becomes subjective between the opinion or differing lines of thought in that are found acceptable. Or, by very problematic expert witnesses.
@thexbigxgreen Рік тому
The local Sheriff's station asks - "How do u solve a murder LOL"
@deepwaters7242 Рік тому
The expert on Cults was super interesting too
@thexbigxgreen Рік тому
This guy could totally be a character on CSI
@brucecruch7290 Рік тому
Is it me or it seems that nobody really addressed the elephant in the room? Namely, the forensic pseudoscientific techniques used for a long time in the identification and the conviction of people, such as “bite mark analysis” or “microscopic hair analysis”, which are now realised to be rather unrealiable.
@suecox2308 9 місяців тому
As a mystery novelist I found this wonderfully informative, especially learning that Sherlock Holmes had a role in encouraging scientific study of crime scenes, and hearing how quickly DNA science is changing--well presented, too!
@laratheplanespotter Рік тому
I’m a student forensic scientist now 🎉😊
@AlterationA 9 місяців тому
Edmond Locard would feel so very vindicated hearing about "micro traces of DNA". Every contact leaves a trace indeed
@hannahpumpkins4359 Рік тому
My grandmother was a neighbor of Capone, and good friends with him. She said Capone spoke to her about the VDM, and he insisted he didn't do it, and had absolutely no involvement in it. He maintained that it wasn't a rival gang, but rather the Chicago Police that did it, in an attempt to stoke outrage in the public and create problems for organized crime in Illinois. My grandmother absolutely believed him, and told me that at the time, the CPD was not very ethical, always on the take, etc.
@slake9727 19 годин тому
Your grandmother sounds very gullible. The chicago PD was bought and paid for by Capone .
WIRED
Переглядів 1,4 млн
WIRED
Переглядів 3,6 млн
Мелодрама твоей души
Переглядів 781 тис.
WIRED
Переглядів 3,1 млн
WIRED
Переглядів 6 млн
WIRED
Переглядів 1,4 млн
Ліга Сміху
Переглядів 336 тис.