the average youtube commenter is a bit...special

From a guy whose screen name is LEGEND! LMAO

This guy is a prick. Everyone can see it.

Lame.

@@LOLHICRONOthe projection is real with this one

Narcissists and phychopaths are at best unpleasant to be around

Anecdotal, but I grew up in a high-middle class family and met many rich men and women during my childhood. If you're the owner of a company over a certain size, you can't succeed without being a psychopath - it's literally a requirement, or you won't be able to cut the same corners and make the same business decisions that's available to the others.

@@nivyan that's so not true dude, the ability to divorce decision making from emotion doesn't meant you _have no_ emotions. That's just a good skill for anybody to have. And it's doubly untrue because not every company cuts every possible corner. It's one thing to say it's a general help and another thing completely to talk in such extremes.

​@@Just.Kidding I'm talking more influential than that - to the point separating decisions from your emotions/life is impossible, and doing so would be the definition of a psychopath. That's the point. I'm not saying everyone is like this - that'd be an idiotic assumption - but they *need* people like that in certain positions, or have such vast success that it doesn't matter to begin with.

It's because everyone thinks they're an expert because they watch True Crime shows.

He sold names of suspects to newspapers, he asked for money in return for interviews regarding Jimmy Saville and he took money from Michelle Mone to make an "investigation" defending her and her husband stealing millions from the NHS. He is a disgrace.

Yes, as happened with the Yorkshire Ripper.

thanks to him and his work for our safety

The risk of developing PTSD is much bigger among police officers. The sort of stuff they have to deal with is going to take a toll on their mental health. The police get a lot of criticism, and not enough appreciation.

Watch the interviews with the British female prison head. She's amazing and also says that no one intimates her.

You have no idea how many cops pride themselves in their "intuition"

It is now a well established fact that no one single ‘negative’ indication of body language during interview/interrogation is indicative of deception.

Yeah plus you can be nervous when answering questions it does not mean your lying imagine being on the hot seat and being interrogated it causes all such of things plus you can have some signs of lying but not actually Lying that's why they need knowledgeable not just these "detectives"

There are variables for interrogation. Alot of training in psychology helps in determining what body language says and what they say. They use purposeful techniques to provoke reactions. Not everything means something, but some things are Indicators. I think JCS goes overboard some times with every detail but overall their trying to get Information from somebody that dosent want to give it. So its accurate and real at least

Agree 100% with both of you, this bloke is really bad at profiling and common sense. Good thing he's now a journalist frontman as opposed to being a real detective

The best cops & detectives are the ones with similar traits to the criminals themselves. I studied criminal psychology in college and wrote my thesis on this subject. The best example I can think of for you to compare is the undercover cops that infiltrate gangs & organized crime. If you’re a regular Joe you are not going to be able to blend in with type A personality biker gang members etc. -no one is that good of an actor. You’d show fear/anxiety etc. and your body would betray you never mind the entire psych aspect.

So people can't talk to you about their accomplishments because then they're not humble?

@Damien Holland - he was dissing the police force as being incompetent, and inferring that he knew it all, when it was the other way around. People who are talented, tend not to boast.

@@damienholland9432 All I can say is that I've watched dozen of videos like this one and he's the first expert that I find arrogant. There's no "we" in his stories, it's like he did it all by himself, and he only mentions the work of others in order to criticize it and make himself look better.

Foreign literally means other countries, so that’s probably why

There are lots of them in other countries though lmao

@@blksheep176 yeah, thought about saying no pun intended but decided against it haha

​@@ryanodonnell455 You think the US has 3.3 million active serial killers? The actual number is much closer to 50.

Maybe it's lead? 🤔

ever seen no country for old men? flip a coin...

Who does think that they should be put back into society? Lol not in America anyway

tf why 😂

the governments role is not punitive it is rehabilitative. The states job isn’t to punish people it’s not make them better

@NithinJune prisons main role is to keep society safe from criminals and crime.... like serial killers.

Huge lie.

Yes but this is also a problem when a distinction is made where there is no difference in criminality. You are speaking like far too many today around 'motive and feelings' as if these matter the most to society or even matter at all. One night a woman is murdered by a man who simply wanted to see he felt anything thrilling and didn't feel a thing. Across town a woman was murdered over a drug debt but not to somehow get the money back but to see if her death struck fearful compliance into other debtors. What our society needs to worry about is that either man, both men, they have crossed a line into criminal murder. That they walk around and can and would do such a thing if they so desire. and here is something to consider. years ago I was watching one of these reality show 'follow along with cops' shows like '48 hours' or whatever it was. - police respond to two dead bodies outside a gas station in a notoriously dangerous neighborhood in a US inner-city. Someone has shot dead a prostitute and a pimp in cold blood and it quickly leads to notorious 'bloodcrip' gang member Tyrone 'Ratchet' Williams. Ohhhh he is quite a suspect. Ratchet, 38 has spent 17 of his 20 adult years in and out of prison including kidnapping women, attempted murder of a woman, manslaughter of a woman and wait there's more, not only is he officially known to have killed two women but Ratchet is strongly linked to the murder of no less than 5 others in the Bloodcrip drug wars and revenge and gangland world. The ONLY reason they caught Ratchet was because witnesses in 'The Hood' started tipping off police (rare very rare) as they said Ratchet had gone so crazy that everyone was terrified of him now. Even the gang was disassociating with him because and he was killing anyone. In this case, the reason why he murdered the two? They had 'disrespected him'. This was mentioned by several blurred out witnesses and calls that they all knew he'd killed that woman earlier that month because she didn't want him to be her pimp and he didn't like that. Ratchet is strongly believed to have killed 15 people over his 38 years of living. The episode wraps up with a slam-dunk conviction of 3 murders and ongoing investigations and charges on several more. Here's my question: Why isn't Ratchet Williams considered a "Serial Killer" like any other? Why not? What is the difference and more than that, what is the difference to our people, our society, to the public? What's the difference to public safety? If your answer is just sorting out little twists of his feelings and what psychological motives he wrestled with then that's just not as important as to what they actually do.

This sounds bad, but I think there should be a distinction made between people who are in the game and those who aren't. If you are heavily involved in the mafia and you get murdered over business, I don't think it should be punished the same as being murdered randomly. Everyone in the game knows the risks and choses to accept them for money.

@@Cretan1000 why wouldn't tehre be a harsher penalty for those who have a premeditated murder threat and even worse they murder each other for money and business. Why, if anything, isn't that even worse than a random passion driven murder? Even worse, they actually think they could supersede murder laws and make their own above-the-law rules in their own separatist justice system? Why not even more penalty for that? and all of that only covers the idea of 'punishment and penalty' i understand 90% of the internet thinks prisons or death penalty or only for punishments instead of the practical point of not letting them be at large in public spaces but if you're only talking penalty then I don't see why the Mafia mobster isn't, arguably, deserving more of a penalty?

this is such an insane thing to say because why on earth should it matter that one was paid and one wasn't? The act of taking a life, a fellow human regardless of how justified and/or logical you believe the motive is still an act that profoundly changes a person for the worse. Mafia members despite whatever fantasy you'd like to believe, kill for pleasure, they enjoy it, they enjoy exerting their power and their dominance over someone, they are serial killers, the serial there is important. You wanting there to be a distinction and other people in this thread going...oh my god yes you're in the game so you know the rules all that means is that you have sympathy for one type of victim and not the other. And that's a very very dangerous road to go down, put down the Godfather book, turn off Narcos realise they are all as bad as the other. Sammy Gravano is a serial killer btw he's just not a famous one, or rather he's not famous for being one but i bet the families of the people he killed would describe him the same way Ted Bundy's victims did, merciless, cruel, sadistic and evil.

​@@zatannazatara552pretty sure they aren't making a moral judgement or saying one isn't as bad..they're purely talking classification. The hitmen and mob killer absolutely is just as brutal and horrific, it's just not the same motivation and category of killer.. obviously.

these days he would be in wagner

Legend, thanks for the recommendation mate!

So there is narcissism. He might be a serial killer himself.

@@clubbizarrethis comment made me laugh lol

​@@clubbizarre overused term. Just pointing out your own achievements isn't even close to making somebody a narcissist.

Looks like that at first, but I think the editing has a lot to do with it. There are a lot of very short sound bites going "I did this" or "My work was instrumental in ..." . But those are spliced in, maybe because whoever cut them in wanted for him to look more impressive. I'm the bits where his answers are left to speak for himself, he comes across very differently: focused on the process much more and on his own part in it mich less.

How do you know it's not an act?

Yep. The world is only a bad place because of bad people.

So deep

Scooby doo amen to that

Simple math problem...

I find it so funny when people try to sound cool by writing nonsensical statements like this. 😂

*affected

@@clownhands could both homonyms suffice context?

Yeah .... There's so much about him that's pretty sus ngl lol

I think there's something about some people become good investigators by being able to think like the criminals they investigate. They understand them. I think this guy is one of them. Might be why he can give some creep vibes, but the strong difference is that he made different choices and knew right from wrong. Edit: I wrote this before I got to the part where he talks about his mental health. I'm more convinced now that he's one of those who can understand serial killers and to be able to do that but still have empathy, that must take a heavy toll on anyone. With his bad mental health and the knowledge/stories he got from the worst of the worst - no wonder he talks like the world is resting on his shoulders!

@@mammamiia08 Only correction: we *hope* he's made the choice to do the right thing. I don't think he's the type to commit a crime, but there are cops and investigators who are also criminals.

​@mammamiia08 lmao hes not gonna be a killer he just understands it well and everyone is human and has similarities.

​@@danitho has he been convicted or charged with anything ?

Not everywhere does it force the police to stop the interview, the US is not the whole world. In Canada you're given a phone to call a lawyer to get the legal advice you are entitled to, then brought back to the interrogation room and the interview continues. Same with the right to silence; the police can continue to question you, for hours even, despite you exercising your right to remain silent by stating you'll not answer to questions. You have to invoke it again and again until the police decides they are wasting their time.

They would talk to you for hours till your lawyer show up. You think you can keep your cool and be silent for hours?

​@@nm7358 you just proved his point about not getting everyone to talk

​@@shaggyfeng9110do think it is torture or something? It isn't hard to not say anything

@@kameronjones7139 And yet so many people do feel a need to say something, even when explained before hand they should say nothing.

JCVD might be proud as well.

Except that the guy argues that people like JCS are crap, because it's all in hindsight. All this body language stuff is rubbish.

Who's JCS?

​@@UriahElroy666 Jim can't swim it's a famous UKposts channel

​@@nm7358 ive always thought it was rubbis, but its still entertaining

The police are allowed to lie to you.

@@SusanBryantInsomniacBookworm yes but my question was why or how is it legal for them to do so.

They need a warrant to do so. They can only do so if they reasonably suspect you are committing or have committed crimes and a judge signs off that the evidence that informs that suspicion is adequate

@@paulavance5096 well that's pretty simple, for example, if they lie in the interrogation room about having good evidence against you and they claim you'll go to prison for a long time, you might be more likely to co operate and give information. that's why there's only 1 word you should ever say to the police and that's "lawyer"

Yes we’ve all seen the ripper

Exactly. This chap obv means well and I wouldn’t want to drag him too much, but like ‘sophisticated profiling techniques’ were and remain a huge problem with the Sutcliffe investigation; surely one could see how wilfully naive you’d have to be to be like ‘yeah but that was before, now our sophisticated profiling is free from misogyny and super effective’

@@elgatonegro1703 he was not a Yorkshire ripper detective, he investigated him 25 years later when he already admitted murders, pretty easy to investigate a murderer who’s happy to admit everything ffs

To be fair, he said that the first five victims were sex workers, which is true. He then said that the police didn't believe that they had a real victim until the sixth victim, who was not a sex worker. That is him saying that the profiling was misogynistic: he is saying the Police didn't believe sex workers were full people and admonishing them for it.

The US justice system is utterly laughable

On a side note one thing I have noticed is that if they have DNA they can convict off that if they don't have a time line or something else and that's why some people get charged unjustly

Yeah the guy who opens up by saying "that guy was faking schizophrenia! I know it! It's impossible to be schizophrenic if you have psychopathy!" Isn't exactly the poster child for restorative justice

Easy when they are dead or dying in prison lmao

Serial killers dont kill random people even if they talk about them negatively

sounds like stalking and as far as I know stalkers never get stopped until it's too late

He might be a narcissist or he might just be trying to promote himself so he can get TV work and sell books.

I love it when people completely miss the point. This is an idiotic take lol. Edit: one person murders people routinely, and one stops serial killers. Am I wrong?

Is there any other way to say what he said?

Ok can you suggest the "proper" way to tell his accomplishment

@@slumpmachinegaming What does your edit have to do with anything? No one refuted that he is responsible for putting some serial killers behind bars. He still comes off as rather narcissistic

Was looking for this comment

Attributing him to other unsolved murders

And typical of thick people like you that you make such nonsense claims

No its typical of the unintelligent.

a smart person knows how much he doesn't know..

Did he? No, he didn't

It is a personality disorder, a whole different ballgame from mental illness. Personality disorders are incredibly disruptive in mental hospitals.

True.People got mad in the comment section for his attitude and I don't know why.

Ego has no place in people being sentenced to a life in jail. It's facts and facts and no ego whatsoever.

That sounds reasonable, but unfortunately it doesn’t work that way. If you have a large ego, which this man clearly does, it’s naive to think that will not leak into his work and influence his investigative techniques and conduct. Police who aren’t egotistical are often pushed to employing unethical and illegal tactics in order to catch who they suspect is the perpetrator, out of frustration and pressure to close cases. Imagine that, plus the need to protect one’s ego and perceived reputation when you think so highly of yourself and your abilities. Also, it is very easy to manipulate people and push buttons when they have fragile egos; not a great weakness to have when interviewing and dealing with criminals.

Yorkshire Ripper.

In your qualified opinion

Just a teeny tiny bit ...

YOU HAVE TO BE IN ORDER TO BE GREAT AT SOMETHING

It probably takes one to know one. That's why he's successful.

It is somewhat arbitrary but there is some logic to it as a tool for ruling out crimes you don’t want in the statistics because they don’t really match what you mean by serial killers. Three people is just the threshold. You could imagine someone in a shitty position killing someone and even a second person by chance in their life due to different out bursts. But three is a long term pattern where they are seeking out people to kill. The reason why killing a bunch of people in a short period is not considered is much for the same reason. Serial killers are a specific type of killer. It involves compulsion and seeking out multiple victims, but if you include short time multiple victims then you muddy the stats with so called spree killers. These people may not be serial killers in the traditional sense. Maybe they snapped and murdered a bunch of people at a grocery store. Or maybe they are a school shooter. Or the guy who snapped and killed multiple police across serveral days in California. These people might be monsters but have you ever thought of a school shooter as a serial killer? So it’s more about making sure you are precise in order to filter down to what people are thinking about when talking about serial killers and get just those killer statistics.

I believe killing multiple people in a short space of time is a spree killer ?

I mean, you can get warrants to do it. It's not like he snuck in in the middle of the night and bugged someone's phone like in a James Bond movie or something.

@@iamme625 But you can't get a warrant as an individual or can you? I get that the state can sometimes do it but it just sounds illegal to do it as an individual.

And yet you need a licence there to listen to short-wave radio.

"In the UK, where the people are subjects" , and , they have traded privacy for safety with their "big brother CCTV" They are the definition of having "The Illusion of Freedom"

What a load of drivel

That someone is you.

@@JuliaClark no way..I have a light clear Aura...I can't be around that dark heaviness!!

@taraleela7144 , then ignore it and move on with your light aura. To ask another to do shadow work you will not do is abusive. To truly let go and let light is for none of this to exist within your timeline.

@@JuliaClark everyone has a strength, a talent, a set of strong skills. That's why we have HR specialists and career psychology profiling. My statement seems to have triggered you. Maybe it is your shadow and your work.

It's unlikely you would ever know

@@monkeytennis8861 Mmhm nah pretty confident in my ability to read people. Also I don't trust people

Most people are actually narcissists yourself included.

@@seungminwhatisyourproblem that's fantastic that you can make such a claim about someone judging by 2 whole sentences

She slipped. Accidents happen.

Omg ur 2nd paragraph just got me thinking a lot 🤔

It's not about the number it's about the motive. Gangsters have killed more people than most serial killers.

@@seungminwhatisyourproblem serial killers kill for lots and lots of different reasons and may have very different driving forces.. some kill for money, some torture and kill for sexual gratification.. some kill because a divine entity tells them to rid the world of evil.. but the bottom line is there isn't a reasonable reason for a serial killer to kill their victim.. gangs kill people they either know or have wrongs them or their group. There is motive to their kills.