That’s business.

Define: Survived Chang co-founded Crashlytics, a mobile company building crash reporting for iOS and Android, with Jeff Seibert in 2011. Crashlytics raised $1 million from venture capitalists Flybridge Capital Partners and Baseline Ventures as well as individual angel investors David Chang, Lars Albright, Jennifer Lum, Peter Wernau, Roy Rodenstein, Chris Sheehan, Ty Danco, Joe Caruso, and others.[7][8][9] In April 2012, Crashlytics raised another $5 million from Flybridge Capital Partners and Baseline Ventures.[10] Crashlytics has been installed on over 2.9 billion active devices and is the #1 most installed SDK for performance. Its Answers product became #1 in mobile analytics-beating out Google Analytics.[11] In January 2013, Twitter acquired Crashlytics for over $100 million. Most of the package was in stock vesting over four years with an upfront payment of $38.2 million in common Twitter stock.[12] In January 2017, Google acquired Crashlytics from Twitter.[13][14][15]

30 years later, none of them will exist.

@@Tradernairecoming back in 12 years

"surviving on life-support" might be more accurate

@@l4ku sound dumb.

They're likely rich from their projects. People like this who like to build things caught the internet at the easiest time to make big money behind the scenes. Now competition is fierce.

Who are you talking about

@@l4k what?

@@laptop_1 wdym

Before he was secretly replaced by a robot.

Incredible that Zuckerberg had all the women he could want from Facebook -all the pretty ones-Then he goes and marries the Ugliest from Vietnam or something

​@@jamesr8584*lizard

@@jamesr8584 I think he was picked as the subject of a MK ultra experiment during his time at Harvard, just like that kid Ted Kaczynski, and that's why he looks and sounds like an complete idiot now.

​@@jamesr8584😂

Still looks familiar ... We just have fancier fonts and animations, and miniaturized machines.

I don't really see the archaicness.

​@@TheRandomGuy570 The webpage design looks ancient. Otherwise it doesn't look that archaic.

i feel you brother

I hear yeah. This makes me feel old as *bleep*!

His name is David ChoE and he has never been the richest artist in the world. i guess the word FUN has more value then Facts. But it does explain how a trash artist like him got so much exposure. Kinda sad tbf, but well. i guess that is art.

@@puntvandekomma9498 name 1 other live fine artist whose net worth surpasses 200 million

@@puntvandekomma9498 You should take it easy. First of all, the 200 million number is outdated. Facebook went public at $28 a share back in 2012, which means that Choe got paid around 5,263,157 shares. Admitting he didn't sell any, those shares would be worth around $1,852,368,387 today ( 2 billion during ATH ) making him the richest artist in the world BY FAR.

​@puntvandekomma9498 OK brainiac, who is the highest paid fine artist?

@@realSamAndrew I think you can find those estimations by yourself, instead of acting out like a woman. But it's certainly not 2 billion dollars, that much I do know.

There will be no humans left to do the review💀

Technology has slowed down its growth so probably longer than that it'll take

@@instalocktaka3712 did you skip AI 2023?

💀💀​@@roviotech9072

@@instalocktaka3712 No it hasn't. Wtf!

She was a content creator before their time lol

She could've been UKposts of her time crazy to think she had the right ideas not the platform

I Never heard of it until now?

​@@StealthGT40so you are suggesting that she is an influencer not an entrepreneur, which was the the whole point of the report.

Never heard of cam

yeah man, bro's sound is pretty recognizable from the second time you hear

is also surreal that someone is using firefox xD

@@Teteercklol, Firefox with ublock origin and privacy badger is the way to go dude. Or do you still have youtube adds I take it?

nah i use arc nowadays and i dont mind watching some adds. i like that youtube it's free :) and creators can make a living of it.@@Dave21103

@@Dave21103 hell yeah brother I'm rocking them

@@Dave21103Heck yeah another person with some sense. I've been using Firefox since the 2000s, before that it was Opera. I've never seen a reason to switch to Chrome.

When you could find loads of information on an internet search. Now junk, next to nothing. The Web has become a more annoying version of TV.

@@zackthebongripper7274 Yep. I have to add "forum" or "reddit" to a search term in order to find anything remotely useful.

no but almost 20 years

thats because how rapid tech changed in past 15 years, especially camera quality lol

​@@zackthebongripper7274 🤡🤡🤡

couldnt agree more, back when the internet was mostly harmless and fun. now its all exploited. wish we could go back in time.

and before politics became 100% cancer

Lolll

The thing I miss the most is everywhere literally asking for all your Real Life details, with photographic evidence and so on.

They would have been happy to know they will make it.

How old are you? Who the heck used Facebook apart from 80 year olds

@@agme8045 I should be asking you that, since you think repeating a tired joke is cool or something. Facebook has the highest use base of all social media platforms. Unless 80 year old make.up most of the world population, then logic dictates everyone uses it

@@QuickProgramming it’s not a joke, only old people use Facebook in the west. I’m 19 years old btw, I don’t mind saying it. In my country at least, only old people use Facebook. Even my parent’s generation is increasingly dumping Facebook in exchange for Instagram instead. Heck, even grandparents are using instagram now. I genuinely don’t know anyone my age who uses Facebook, and it’s been like that for years. Last time I used it I was 11 years old. Unless you’re from Africa or Asia, wth are you doing on Facebook? It’s full of boomers spreading fake news.

@@agme8045 that's anecdotal evidence. Just coz no one you know uses it doesn't mean no one does. At 19, Google must be your friend. A simple Google search will tell you Facebook is the most used across all countries and ages. 320 million people in India use Facebook, while 190 million are from the USA. So USA is not so different to india considering india has almost 2 billion people, compared to 500 million from usa. It actually means more people per capita use facebook in usa than india. 40% of all UK people use facebook daily. Thats not a small number. 25% of facebook users are between 25-35, which is very high. So unless you consider this age group as old, your stats are wrong. Facebook may be the origin of most conspiracy theories but at this point, I think twitter has probably taken that spot since Elon took over

Interesting did he meet his goal? His site Is dead

@@BrutalStrike2im sure he made a bunch of money before the business sunk

He had another company that Twitter bought.

@@BrutalStrike2 yeah he's cracked

i i have the feeling the bar is much much higher in every industry actually. I dont knwo whats happening, but seems competition got fiercer in every field. I see older people from the previous generation that were reasonably succesful in their lives but that wouldnt stand a chance today.

A crazy or unique idea was enough two to three (or four) decades ago to be a blockbuster hit. Now you need more than that.

If he was using tools and available knowledge only from that time, then not really.

Actually those aren't your words, those are TechLeads

The barrier for entry is practically on the floor now. Back then, figuring out how to do "basic" things didn't involve watching the first 5 youtube videos you found on the topic. You had to really work at figuring things out. It also didn't involve connecting frameworks together and working as a glorified digital plumber which is what a _lot_ of the industry is now. Plumbers are still skilled jobs that can make good money, but you aren't typically solving novel problems or revolutionizing anything

huh

cant deny. but unfortunately she is the least successful person among the four

she also had a terrible idea and niche. i mean who tf buys cameras in the 2000s

Back when cars, planes, science and other things were seen as something good….

I still see it as something good. It’s just that you’re negative lol.

Yet, you're still using it...

wah wah internet bad );

3 out of 4 people are worth more than $100M today

Remember:) the purpose of the site was to troll for "hot chicks"

@@antzleah5413 You're right. Zuck was halfway through puberty at that time. :o)

myspace was king long before facebook.

Yeah, lol

​@@doubleoseven273 and what it is now?

im using it right now

the only thing that's not trash from all the rest of these

It’s trash. Brave is so much better.

Their stance on and actions on censoring "hate speech" really killed it for a lot of people.

@@ABC-ip6jq Perhaps, but I separate political/cultural views from software. Firefox itself does not push anything onto me, it is merely software.

Women…

And she made bank from it too.

I believe even back then they knew it was a review blog, but they just included her for diversity (to show at least 1 woman).

@@sriharshacv7760 that’s progressive!

No different from any content creator like Marques Brownlee today. Making bank in the early internet (just before UKposts) reviewing sht? She was ahead of her time.

Much better times

​@@Cr7_archivesthat's what everyone always says about the past. That's what they said about the 90s and 80s, and in those times, the 60s or whatever. People in the future will look back at now and say, "ah, simpler, better times". We're all just nostalgic. It doesn't mean anything.

eh.. It just felt weird looking at yourself on screen since you didn't get to see yourself all the time through your cell phone camera.

@@thebusybeanhomecafe4035 Right? 9/11, the tech bubble, economic recessions. Such better times. It's a phrase used by the willfully ignorant.

Almost 20 years ago

@@Kbxbigbro808 `18 full years so far

​@@Kbxbigbro80818 years

19

5. Robert Paulson

maybe to powerful

lol

Good luck with that lol

@@u2b83 its the jews

💀💀💀💀

He ruined society

@@Daydreamerr13 better him than some chinese company

They don't have monopoly

What a garbage little comment. You must be watching a lot of TV, because non of those things are actually true, or problematic. The n°1 reason for Facebook being a nightmare is censorship and deplatforming.

No he didn't. He wrote a fan fiction script for the show. It never got turned into a script and isn't that good.

@@RickR69 lol

Stop acting out like a gay man. Nothing about this service is destructive, you're just blabbering nonsense that you heard on TV.

so funny haha, my comment I just wrote basically touches on this too. Gnarly. You see these college students 'spending hours', as the announcer said, on 'The Facebook' and the camera pans to teenagers scrolling...haunting to see that that's what the majority of society does now a days. The seed was planted.

This looks...very normal to me lol. The one on the right looks like it's his editor (probably vim or emacs), a couple on the left for running the app locally and any other tools might need (database client, etc.), and the actual site open in the bottom left corner. If they were going for movie hacker vibe, this is the most realistic movie I've ever seen

@@soggy_dev but that shot looks a little staged

@@quebuena111 Not really thats normal software dev setup, Right now I opened 2 browser for testing and one editor(Vscode) and Teams , Outlook and Terminal and a S3Bucket client for transferring compiled files to server

​@MelonEsuk wasn't web development in the early 2000s just opening notepad

Didnt work..he got sued.

He said snap shot

You could literally just be making money taking photos from the past instead of doing all that. Way better idea for making money using a time machine.

Yep

people would actually still have social skills, have less anxiety, depression, and distractions-thats probably what. lol. I wish that timeline happened.