The Marder was originaly designed as a Tank destroyer? Thats completely new to me. Development of the Marder started in 1959 as a accompanying IFV for the Leopard 1. It has nothing to do with the Marder Tank destroyer family of WW2

The Marder was never designed as an Antitank-vehicle and it had nothing to do with the WW2 Marder. It was designed to fight together with the Leopard as an Infantry Fighting Vehicle/ Schützenpanzer. It was part of the special German Panzergrenadier concept.

The main role of the Marder is and always has been to accompany the Leopard tanks with mechanized infantry. I mean it is kind of in the name "infantry fighting vehicle" or german "Schützenpanzer". A Marder is a small weasel like animal. Quick, nimble and hard to catch. It's main role never was to be a tank destroyer. The Leopards favorite prey are soviet tanks. They are the tank destroyers. Though some Marders are equipped with anti tank missiles. And there are many specialised versions. But it is mainly used by the Panzergrendiere, specialised infantry that accompanies, protects and fights besides our tanks. They are equipped with anti tank weapons like the Panzerfaust. That is part of the german mechanized war doctrine since WW2. The Wehmacht mainly used different half tracked vehicles, the Bundeswehr the Marder and since a few years the Puma.

There is so much misinformation about the marder Ifv in this Video. The tank destroyer from WW2 has nothing to do with the Ifv from the 1960. And its designt as an Ifv from the get go, to work thogeter with the Leopard 1 Tanks. Thers no parts from the Leopard 1 Tank, everything is new designt. Topspeed is about 47mph or 75kmh. And the 1960 marder never intended to be a Tank destroyer.

Neither was the Marder fielded in the Gulf War, nor was it developed as or on the basis of a tank destroyer, nor is it based on the chassis of the Leopard 2 Tank. The Marder has it's propulsion in the front of the vehicle, while the Leopard has its on the rear end. This video is crab!

US Marines do not use the Bradley... And the chassis is separate from the M113. Where are you getting the marder being a tank destroyer stuff from? This video seems like it's got some factual problems

The video is full of errors. The IFV Marder was never a tank destroyer and also not in WW2. In WW2 there were tanks / tank destroyers named Marder I, II and III, but they have nothing in common except the name. Unfortantely the history as "tank destroyer" seems to make it much worse in it's role as an IFV 🙂 Marder is about as big as the Bradley, but much more heavy -> armor. The armor is about the same quality, Marder perhaps better at the sides, Bradley at the top and against RPGs. Was this video done automatically by AI?

The Marder was designed as a infantry fighting vehicle. Not to be confused with the WW2 tank destroyer. They have nothing to do with each other. You also confuse numbers regarding to speed between the WW2 Marder and the modern IFV Marder. The Marder was designed for the same role as the Bradley. They can carry the same number of crew and "passengers". The Marder is the faster and more agile, with more range than the Bradley. It was supposed to keep up with the very fast Leopard 1. If you want to compare Bradley with the Marder today, that means in the case of Ukraine the 1A3. The 1A3 has improved armour, that gives comparable or better protection than the Bradley. The 1A3 has a comprehensive electronic suit. The most modern IFV in Ukraine is, I suppose, the CV 90 from Sweden.

Just because there was a "tank destroyer" with the same name in WW2 doesn't mean the modern one was designed as such. That's complete nonsense

The Marder was a tank destroyer? 😂😂

The Bradley is not amphibious. It can ford water but it's not like a BMP or original LAVs.

There are wrong grafics used. The front view of the Marder in desert color is the front view of the Jaguar (Jagdpanzer). The Marder was never designed to be a tank hunter. A variation of the Marder chassis with Leopard 1 turret was sold to Argentina. Jagspanzer (8 cylinder 500HP) and Leopard1 (10 cylinder 830 HP) have rear engines and gearing, the Marder has front engine (6 cylinder 600 HP) and gearing.

Both can be effective and successful when military commanders plan their strategy properly and deploy them in areas where they are most effective.

The Marder has not the chassis of the Leopard 1. It was a completely new design for the Marder and then for the Roland anti-aircraft missile tank.

Omar Bradley was the first Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the last Five Star General/General of the Army in the United States. He was also a commander of the US Army Infantry School and commanded the largest unit of American soldiers ever - 1.3M in the 12th Army Group.

1:33 the Marder is old, but not THAT old XD

So Manny glaringly Wrong facts in this video that its not worth watching... it will just confuse you.

The Bradley is obviously a bit better since it's almost 2 decades newer. However I can imagine that having a very low profile can be a huge advantage on the relatively flat battlefield terrain in Ukraine.

Experience from the Second World War showed that the german mechanized infantry ( Panzergrenadiere ) preferred to fight mounted from the SdKfz infantry fighting vehicle. The Marder was designed based of this requirementsGood armor, ABC Protection, and enough space for the infantry to fight mounted. The Bradley was designed in a similar way, model was the Marder with some modifications and vehicle parts made in USA. Wich IFV is better ? My opinion its a draw. I drove the Marder 81-82 and had a chance to take place in a Bradley at the Grafenwoehr Training Area.

bradley is obviously newer and superior to marder. the cv90 is newer than both and effective targeting, but if bradley is fitted with ERA, it has better survivability.

Like comparing an apple vs orange. Possibly made by an arms manufacturer?

Both seem to be effective.

For our (all) best, there is no US vs Germany anymore. We are brothers (at least for me)

This video confuses the Marders of the Wehrmacht with those of the Bundeswehr.

USA has about 4300 Bradly's in their stockpiles

Doesn`t say how many soldiers fit in these IFVs. Main things are just wrong.

my goodness...where do you got your information from?? Yes they both have a cannon, yes both are running on tracks, and yes they are both carrying infantry... that´s it. pls take some time and do some research.

The Marder was limited in power, aka two of its cylinders were capped to save fuel. I can tell you 60 miles per hour on a freeway we’re not pushing this vehicle and on frozen terrain you better we’re sitting down and get buckled. Thus the speed was to protect the crew, not the vehicle.

Poor research. Too many errors.

the ww2 marder tank destroyer has nothing to do with the marder IFV

Come on.... The Marder is NOT a tank destroyer.... It's an IFV similar to the BMP (and the Bradley). The Marder fights in combo with tanks (Leopard 1/2) called the "Verbund der Waffen". The Marder has anti-tank capabilities (Milan/Mellls) - but thats not his primary role.

Tank destroyer? Bullshit. It s a Personal carrier...

What about anti tank mines?

If you want to learn more about the Bradley development watch the movie "The Pentagon Wars" from 1998.

the visuals need metric convertions.

wich Nation used the Marder in the Golf War? germany dident sent troops as far as i know

sadly a video with many mistakes. I dont think the marder was designed as a tankdestroyer at All. its more a 70ties ifv with some capabilitys to fight the tanks of that time. Thats why it has its engine at the front, to protect the crew and soldiers. And there are also wrong things in this video concerning the bradley.

i would take the marten in ukraine because the main fights here are against soldiers. the 20mm cannon is the better choice because the marten has a lot more ammunition with it

R.I.P logic and facts 🥲

Auf Grund des Altersunterschied und des Verwendungszweck, der nie als "Jagdpanzer" vorgesehen war (schlecht recherschiert!), schneidet der ältere Schützenpanzer Marder doch recht gut, oder sogar gleich ab! ABER, auf Grund der Medien, soll der Bradley sich im Ruhm der Beiträge sonnen und die Aufmerksamkeit der Russen auf sich lenken, somit bleiben die Marder unbehelligt und können besser ihre Aufgaben erledigen!

5:25 Wow, that 20mm on the Marder must have nuclear rounds in order to take out a MBT.

The amphibious Bradley... Hm...

We'll see.

you compare the german tank, developed in the late 1960s with the Bradley, 20 years later. Is this true, fair? Compare the Bradley with the German Puma, who works together in big network teams, it's the same and wrong!

really M2 is used by USMC?

Almost everything said about the Marder in this Video is complete BS.

This is nonsense the Marder was never a Tank destroyer

The of today was never intended to be a tank destroyer - you are mixing up todays Marder with the Marder of the Wehrmacht in worldwar II

Send them the puma

Sorry, but the marder is more importent. Germany do more protection. So go with the bradley but you are more protected with the marder. Than you can Service.

A poorly researched video. The Marder was developed as a successor to the completely miserable HS30 (Schützenpanzer, lang), which was completely unsuitable and was only procured through corruption and bribes and which also led to one of the biggest arms scandals and a committee of inquiry from which of course nothing came out, except that one Pawn Sacrifice was murdered and two arrested and has nothing to do with the Marder tank destroyer. The tank destroyer was called Jaguar. HS30 was the successor to the Sd.Kfz. 251. In between there was the M39 and the M113. The fact that the chassis have similar components is due to a Bundeswehr concept of using as many uniform parts as possible. For example, the tank engines from MTU are all basically identical in construction. They are available as V6, V8, V10 and V12 but in principle they are identical. A cylinder head from the Marder also fits a Leopard 1, fits a Jaguar tank destroyer. What is also left out here is that the Marder at 1977 equipped with the MILAN or MELLS guided missile, which means it already has considerable firepower against armored targets. What is also left out here is that the Marder can be equipped with the MILAN or MELLS guided missile, which means it already has considerable firepower against armored targets. Since 1984 they have had thermal imaging devices, since 2002 they have had mine protection, additional armor (which eliminated the side ball mounts for rifflemen), and since 2010 they have had air conditioning, jammers, and multispectral camouflage equipment. I still think the Bradley is superior, but not as superior as it seems in the video. In addition, the war in Ukraine shows how quickly completely outdated or cheap devices suddenly become very interesting and important. If someone had told me before that you could decimate a tank brigade with DJI drones for 1000 bucks, I would have thought you were crazy.

Marder a tank destroyer? Yeah, whatever…

Marder a tankdestroyer??? Max speed 30 mph??? Range 125 miles??? Obviously the Marder of WW2 was mixed up whith the modern AFV. Another AI generated rubbisch. I recommend delet this.

🇨🇱 Chile got the Marder,next to the 🐆 Leopard2A4 ChL,ready to kick communists asses.

Do your research man, so many things that aren’t just true

Bradley can withstand high caliber rounds

Lol, the marder being a tank destroyer? really? besides, the bradley came intro production in 1981 and the marder in 1959, that's a huge time gap to claim it's better because superior american engineers designed it, they weren't even designed for the same purpose, it's like comparing a colt 1911 with a toaster.

Sooo much wrong in this one 😂

THE SWEDISH. cv90 smash them both.

Music is annoying!!!!!!

Not a very informed episode. Tank destroyer? Is the obviously error among others.

both now part of Russia's collection set.

Лартака сток бунданка рок 👍 фияркута бонза бугазотка тутка сияние бухта

Haven’t seen so much bs in one video

This email is factually wrong on so many levels.

Каркустка страктакта барзактория бакраска бурструкт фиграния фидачкот...

That's weird - 2:19 - Germany did not participate in Gulf War, you mixed smth up. Tank destroyer 3:47 - again weird. Light 5:04 ?? Don't make videos drunk. Allied tanks 5:27??? What a horror. Maybe simple AI has created this video?

countless errors in this video...

Well maybe if they changed the spelling to MURDER who knows it may have been fiercer and more effective in the battlefield lol

Дранкта гулизгат кадраскта гублана лугарот бензикта кугланкта лигазот трикдрастка

Both are going to cause severe problems for the RuZZians. 🇺🇸🤝🇩🇪🇺🇦

The cheap Lancet will probably destroy them...

It will be a huge business for the Russians to export and recycle all this waste iron, the BRICS states are looking for gigantic mountains of money.

Дранкта гулизгат кадраскта гублана лугарот бензикта кугланкта лигазот трикдрастка