Progress, yeah, but I wish that instead of being oh and aww about all these advances in AI capabilities Dr. KZF took a moment to consider if/how it is a beneficial advance. There's no doubt that this technology will be used for good things like having personalized high-quality movies, but there are also clear risks that should not just be unmentioned.

Aye, the progress is amazing.

Can I use Video-To-Video style transfers to say: "I really miss this old XYZ show, please create new episodes that feel similar." 😲

@@momom6197 shit is going to be chaotic in the next couple of years.

@@momom6197 And also the potential real-world use cases. Images and movies might be fun, but they represent only a fraction of the world economy. Surely there becomes a point when we have enough images and movies? What are the benefits of personalised movies and generative imagery beyond just novelty? Will they help to solve climate change, for example?

would need to be real time at least, no one waiting 5 minutes to watch an ai generated movie

Same with porn

@@incription thats Netflix 3.0

I bet you have a blue checkmark on twitter

​@@marceelino I'm shocked that your mind would go there. That is terrible. I can't believe you. Etc

lOOOOOOOl

Hello fellow AI

It's about time we will not be alive

xD

We may never get access to this

It’s now 2 weeks later and you’re right

I mean, if most image models can‘t do hands, video models definitely can‘t. Most people can‘t draw hands either!

there was a previous flood of sh*** before AI, except now the sh*** is prettier.

@@wilburdemitel8468 Until one day its not even shit anymore.

technophobe

:)) u like human experiments? I dont think anyone can estimate the consequences of the Facebook-mindmelt catastrophe alone yet-and now comes completely detached symbols only measured by their statistical value. Have fun, Algorythm.@@matowakan

I agree. As someone who has an unending desire to create my own path as an artist, writer and animator... everytime i see a video like this i feel also demotivated. The fact that the equivalent of years of work can be accessible to all with a click of a button scares me sometimes. Maybe our future is to make use of thoses technologies to better our work, but it's the ease of access that i do not like. Art should be hard, not accessible.

Your art is your art, don't compare it to AI or others (at least in a competitive sense), refine your own style and find pleasure in it and you will always find fulfillment in life :)

@@phen-themoogle7651 I'm sorry, but this response sounds like it's coming from someone who has no prospects or interest in making a living as an artist. Of course people will always be able to create art as a hobby, to express themselves, for personal gratification. But for those of us who want to live our lives as artists, you might as well be saying "you no longer have any business making money with art". This doesn't only count for visual media, by the way.

@@vixnell6870 I don't know if I agree with the notion that creation should be inherently difficult, but I do think that skill and style are marketable and directly related to employability, and those factors are being minimized with tools like this.

I think it is actually good for artists with strong artistic skill, but bad for those specialized in technical skill. Just as photography replaced painted murals, this replaces a lot of the technical grunt work needed to bring a vision to life. Artists with a superior vision will always beat the button clickers, at least until the AI is at a super intelligence level and has direct access to human experiences and understanding

you have to want to do it, you will do only what you want to do, and won't have to worry about what you don't want to do, basically AMAZING STUFF!

​@@NeroDefoggerThats cool and all, but some mediums will really suffer from this Lets say that Ai learns how to write like a profesional, lets also say that Ai can make you a personal profile and know the kind of story youll wanna read at any given time Turns out that if this happens, nobody will write a book nor come with ideas ever again Why? Because writing a book is not only about creating a story, but also about sharing it and having other people reading it If we get to the point where Ai can generate perfect stories for any user... Then the whole book market dissapears, fandoms will dissapear too for this exact same reason or will be of a much smaller size due to the amount of genuinely good content Its really a weird, yet unavoidable future imo

@@doodoo2065 you express it in a bit of a weird way, what I think you meant to highlight is that even if people can still create what they like they might not be able to share it with people because people will only consume ai generated stuff and that might for example take away fandoms, if that is what you meant to say then... you might be right, kinda, like it is hard to say exactly how much people will go to ai stuff and how much people will want to check your stuff, probably a lot of people still want to check human generated content, but it might be a lot LOT less, maybe enough to cause discomfort in some people, I for example myself don't think I would mind if people don't consume my content, I want to create it mainly for myself, but I could see those 2 things happening, people liking people consuming their content and people not doing so because they only want to consume ai, if those 2 happen then you would be right, that would create discomfort

job replacement has its advantages, don't forget that, it has bad and it has good, it has both, or you can throw away right this very second all of your advanced technology products like computers phones headsets tvs everything, or what... you kinda like those?

@@NeroDefogger keep extending your logic and get back to me

@@mirarstudios what? literally what does even "extend logic" mean?

@@NeroDefogger ha..never mind hey. Good day.

@@mirarstudios you said something that didn't matter? it mattered so little that you now "never mind" it? then why did you say it to begin with? something that really doesn't seem to make any sense to begin with, like literally you only said "extend logic" and there is no definition on the internet for such thing

It will speed up a lot of tedious grunt work for sure, and just like with any other art style, no one is stopping you from doing it the old way if you want your specific artistic expression in the work. I'm a sound designer and foley artist, but criticizing this would be like a portrait painter getting angry over the invention of the camera, or all the graphic designers who got all up in arms when Photoshop first came out.

"More likely highly tailored." - a prefab Sprout

I was thinking the same! that's a nebula many light years away, it looks exactly the same from any point in the solar system, we can't see it in any other angle, so yeah it was funny to see how the ai predicted it

@@NeroDefogger There's been loads of 3D animations of that nebula and similar ones in so I'm guessing it just stole one of those.. errr I mean, interpreted one of those from its dataset.

@@kilvertm how can there be "loads" of animations of something that can't be seen? that is very weird and I'm very skeptical of it, I've never seen any, and even less to be "loads" of it. as for "stole" let me lecture you about what the word "stole" means and how an AI doesn't work and why they are clearly incompatible: the word "stole" means to actually take the thing itself, as it is, not a similar thing, like you don't stole an actual working car by getting a toy car, even if it is similar, you are not stealing just for something being similar, stealing means getting the exact thing as it exactly is 1 to 1, and an AI doesn't work by copying thing 1 to 1 exactly pixel by pixel byte by byte, so it clearly is not stealing. as for "interpreted" no that one is not the right word either, as "interpret" means to use in a different way that can be used, like if the same data can be understood in different ways, but no, that data is the same for every person and for every computer program, it is not interpreted, like you are interpreting when you interpret text as code, because it is the same data but used in different ways, or when an image is in a different format like .png or .jpg and if it interprets in with the wrong one and the data is made for only one of the formats it might not understand it, but that is clearly not what you means, so "interpret" is not the right word either. you clearly don't know anything about any of this and are making yourself look stupid, I'm trying to help you but you really should stop talking about things that you don't know about, I am an actual software developer, please, just please.... just don't.

@@NeroDefogger wut... There are loads of conceptual animations out there of nebulas... the AI isn't predicting anything here other than how it thinks that this particular image should move.. which will obviously be based on whatever the AI deems is appropriate for the image. In this case, gaseous materials, vapor, clouds, or yes, even 3d representations of this exact nebula which already exist publicly....

@@kilvertm alright dude maybe, dunno, it seems like such an incredibly weird thing to make animations of, like super super weird so dunno, I didn't thought people did such weird pointless stuff but who fking knows, people are weird and they just might. it is predicting, that is literally what it is doing, that is actually the right verb, so absurd that you mention 2 verbs wrongly and now that you say the actual right one you say that it isn't right, yes it is in fact predicting, now, predicting doesn't mean you are right, like I could predict that in the next second I will be rich, I just did that, I did that and that is a prediction, I just predicted something, now, did it actually come true? no, so my prediction was wrong, but it was still a prediction, just a wrong one, that is what the AI is doing, a wrong prediction, (to be more pedantic we literally can't know how the nebula is as we can't see but like, you know, what are the actual fking chances...)

“Right’s”. Yes….. People have rights to the videos (with audio) that they freely upload to UKposts after blindly checking the “I accept the terms and conditions” box. That’s a good one.

Tokens are just concepts, like “dog”. We use them ourselves as humans, they’re a shorthand way of describing things, behaviors, etc. the reason why we use the term “tokens” rather than “words” for ai is because it’s easier for the ai to translate text into abstract tokens before “reading” it. Think of it as a more abstract form or words that doesn’t use letters. In programming, the same thing happens when compiling code. The compiler “reads” the code and converts all the variable/function names into tokens, which are easier to store and manage than strings, but aren’t really readable for humans.

@@AlexPBenton I think OP is criticizing how they trained the models and got these tokens by scraping the internet, etc. For example, van Gogh, along with millions of living artists, did not accept these terms and conditions, and a lot of artists personal style of expression are even trademarked and copyrighted. IMHO it's not that much different from how it always has worked, as people sample pieces of music to make new songs, get inspired by other artists style and some times straight up copies it, which is the very foundation of artistic innovation, but a lot of people feel different.

@@sausas8209 Oh I know, I’m just explaining what the words mean

I mean in language generation a token is usually a word but it can be other things like a symbol half a word or 2 words, I don't know how exactly audio and video techniques work but I would assume something similar, so like... an image maybe? is a video token? dunno, does it really matter that much to you if you don't even work with that technology?

It’s not “hype”. It’s here and it’s real. It’s changing so fast everyone is having trouble keeping up. He has to keep up with the times to make the algorithm happy.

@@blzrdphoto Real things get hyped up all the time. I'm not saying it's not worthy of attention. But there's simply no other channel that's close to the quality of light and physics simulations that Dr. Fehér used to put out. Oh well, it was good while it lasted.

I mean, it is a crazy technology, I don't think you can blame him that much

@@blzrdphotowe have to remember it’s research and unfinished work. Viewers; it’s happen so fast. Users; when is next version coming fixing all bugs.

Why take an old already working idea like watching movies and try to do it interactive, we have tried it before

A movie is more than scenes stacked together. Not so much talk about all uncanny valley problems.

true

We live in the future because it’s not finished yet to use and it will have problems that demos not showing

I hope!

google made it so it will probably never be made public. Most of the stuff on this channel is never made public unless specifically stated that it is.

Until you pay attention to details and want to find your own unique expression among endless competition doing all the same.

@@hombacom OK, everyone gets it you hate AI...Jesus dude.