I feel so fortunate , we all do , to be able to hear really mind-blowing arguments and discussions from such famous and great physicists along with other renowned people like Lenny !! And that too for free!!!

Best quantum gravity hypothesis I have seen on UKposts so far....i watch it a few times each year. I keep coming bk whenever I start forgetting.

This beautiful lecture describes a "snapshot photograph" of a part of a hugely dynamic system. It cannot and is not designed to explain the totality of entanglement nor gravity. However, that in no way negates the truth of that piece of information regarding a very real relationship between gravity and quantum entanglement. It is one more piece of the puzzle, not the finished puzzle. This is how knowledge grows overtime and when enough of the puzzle pieces are in place we will "see" a stunning picture emerge. In all scientific study it seems that suddenly a great discovery is made by several individuals around the world at the same time. In truth they are simply laying down the last few puzzle pieces and announcing the whole picture, based on the hard work of so many others that came first. Complaining about the obvious holes or missing puzzle pieces of information isn't constructive, work to fill them with another puzzle piece my friend or just enjoy the breath taking show for free!

This lecture would be much better if the video editor had shown the slides as Mark was explaining them rather than show him waving his laser pointer around.

A very clear and beautiful talk. Thank you ! Thank you!

Love this lecture. Thank you! Note to the camera work. wide angle is bliss.

great lecture mark thanks great insights about ads cft

A very clear and beautiful talk. Thank you !

Very interesting talk. Many thanks.

He's a great communicator. Excellent Talk.,

Even though I don’t understand what you’re describing I totally think you’re on the right track! This makes so much sense to me.

Thanks to Lenny and Stanford for this excellent lecture. I am not scared of 'gravity' anymore.

Great talk. Thank you.

great talk. but please fur the next ones please do instruct the presenter to repeat the question in lack of a microphone fur the one that poses the question otherwise it's pretty hard for us to understand the question. thanks very much Standford fur sharing this presentation. I share the excitement.

This is fascinating stuff. Difficult topic covered very clearly.

Nice work. Keep up.

WOW this is just wonderful thankyou.

one of the best lectures 👍🏻👍🏻

This feels like it may be the most important video I've ever watched. This feels like scientific history being made.

This guy’s suit makes me trust him more

It's great to see that progress is being made, and I love that there are these super-smart people doing this kind of work. But it always seems that sound and other basic production values are lacking. In this case, it's that we can't see the laser pointer on the screen. I'd love to be there, but, please, just a little thought into what it's like for a viewer to watch. Thanks so much!

Thanks for this lecture

Entanglement makes sense in a fundamental way to the logical relation between gravitational physics to quantum physics, It has helped me differ from the Relativity theory of Einstein "an unlinked tiny piece of imagination that works", which in my view is a case scenario that matches precisely and just works nicely on a rather ideal model within the universe, but is distant from the more complex real black holes/matter "ENTANGLED" relation.

An excellent summary of these extremely exciting developments.

Can you work with projectors on ortogonal subspaces? Derive second-order correction to entropy?

Thank you for being honest.

Thank you for this tremendous video. I just thought I'd mention something at 27:40. He defines the entropy of a subsystem A in (A union B), but it's equal to the entropy of B in (A union B), so we can call it the entanglement of A and B. It comes down to showing that the non-zero eigenvalues of (M M^*) and (M^* M) are equal, where M is a complex matrix which might not be square. These eigenvalues are the probabilities p_i.

Great talk

Thank you your overall dissertation helps me visualize a simple four dimensional symbol that incorporates and combines all... an ankh with yin yang base which is the complete self contained equation that makes sense to me. It could be transcribed using sacred geometry. The simplicity is a good beginning point. Three dimensionally I envision it as the convergence point of two pyramids joined at the apex, spinning and entwined... could say entangled like snakes on a pole... once again in a four dimensional perspective, yet of different element. As a whole this would have many component parts.

I am wondering that if one can relate entanglement entropy in a specific form(like S~ln(L)) to a specific spacetime ,could another form of entropy would relate to other kind of spacetime

If you are interested, the interaction between Jacob Bekenstein and Steven Hawkins was quite a humdinger! Hawking thought Bekenstein was off his rocker to suggest nthat black holes had entropy! Eventually though, when Hawking had refined the math, he discovered that Bekenstein was right after all! Hawkins describes the event in one of his own videos somewhere.

Fascinating

CFT EPR entanglement on the horizon boundary hologram screen on Planck scale 10^19 Gev is the glue for ER QM Gravity wormhole foam in the bulk hologram image is one main idea in this video. However, if number of boundary bit pixels Lp is conserved, the voxels L in the bulk must be at 1Gev scale not 10^19 Gev. N = A/4Lp^2 = A^3/2/L^3 ~ 10^123 when A ~ 10^56 cm^2 ref. papers by Jack Ng Therefore, hadronic strings as hologram images makes sense.

Can we give a dual description of time using this dual theory ,that is it is encoded as some type of quantum correlations in the boundary theory?

I am absolutely fascinated by the idea (published by Prof Van Raamsdonk) that the connectedness of space time could maybe be thought of as an emergent property of Quantum Entanglement. I certainly do not fully understand this idea or its limitations but, to me, it seems that Quantum Entanglement could be related to a measure of locality and might provide some new insight into the local realism of our universe. I have a related question about what this may (or may not) suggest about how to imagine the collapse of a waveform. Let's say, for example, the spin of a particle is in a superposition of states and is then "measured" to be in a definite state (i.e. it's waveform collapses). Before continuing I need to ask a clarifying question for my own understanding: Generally would this "measured" particle become entangled with the particle or field with which it was "measured" (e.g. due to conservation of angular momentum)? For my question I am assuming (pending clarification) that entanglement between the "measured" particle and what it was "measured" with does occur. Finally my question is, if Entanglement does imply a connectedness akin to locality, could the collapse of a waveform and any resulting entanglement be imagined as if the entangled quantum objects remain (in some sense) adjacent or overlapping in space and time? For context I have not studied Quantum Mechanics beyond an introductory course and that was a while ago. Thanks for taking the time to read and reply. Sorry if my question is unclear.

I'd like to ask two questions refering to Prof.Raamsdonk's talk, 1). For an AdS--sphere--BH, given a temperature ,there are two different BH solution, so what difference of the dual CFTs correspond to this 2 solutions? Are they in same quantum state? 2). Still AdS--sphere--BH, if the mass of BH approach to zero, on the one hand, the BH temperature diverges, which means the state of BDY CFT will be a highly mixed state (? I'm not sure), and on the other hand, the bulk geometry will degenerate to pure AdS geometry, so how to understand a highly mixed CFT state living on the boundary of pure AdS, in the standard AdS/CFT correspondence? (These questions may be trivial or wrong, please forgive me)

Great presentation Mark ... Can you expand on ER = EPR 's relationship to the Luminiferous aether, Derac Sea, and the Higgs boson ? Also , on zero point or vacuum energy and to Erik Verlinde's emergent gravity theory paper , constructor theory , and more detail on how it is tied to quantum computing? Thank you !

Great lecture! I recommend listening to at 1.5x.

Bravo. (*Im wondering a very basic thing...........) Is language, spoken, or expounded confusing us from a coalescence ??? (*Maybe alot of us are saying similar things in different ways?)

"What goes up must come down", old saying still applies to resonance bonding frequencies in superposition proportioning.., in full Perspective Projection Drawing Conception.

one more question is the growth of the inside trying to get to the same place in most or all blackholes

is the disturbed state of entanglement able to spark off a fusion reaction

Zooming in close is ok with interviews and such, where the targets sits still. I feel a bit dizzy, and it’s not only the amazing information content, that makes my room sway..

Thinking about those 2 in the context of quantum entanglement is what forms space/time "spooky action at a distance"(which is not really a distance anymore) suddenly starts to make perfect sense...

How do you make QIT have something to do with space time?

i have a jacket exactly like that except it has a graph of Euler's identity on the back (not really but i wish).

He's a great communicator. I wish Maldacena would take diction training, because he really does have some great stuff too.

must be a difference of entangled space for the different latitudes of a spinning orb and maybe altitude of different levels of atmosphere above different latitudes

Empty state field cancellation occurs how can explain cancellation

I thought Maldecena only showed gravity emerging in an ADS space, i.e. not this universe. Has this been resolved since then, or are we still talking about gravity inside Escher paintings?

Entangled states form in terms of the spin polarizations regardless of the charge of the particles. In case of the quantum fields, the polarization states of the boson quantum fields are up or down or zero giving rise to the quantum entanglement under the action of polarizing magnetic fields resulting in what we can call ```Hyper-Minkowski space``.

way cool......more more

So ... if you had the magic power to substantially reduce the entanglement inherent in a system, that would flatten or at least alter the space time curvature without effecting the energy (and consequently mass) of the system?

Is symmetry entangled geometry?

probably ties frequency to time if entanglement is responsible for the geometry of space giving mass interactions with the entangled space sets up a standing wave we call gravity

Is entanglement entropy ergodic ?

The professor delivers a wonderful exposition.If I understood correctly the geometry of our de Sitter space is encoded in the boundary thru entangled entropy and it has to “answer” Einstein equations.From that it follows that these equations are encoded in the CFT.So there’s two possibilities.Either the dna of a evolved primate is entangled with the entropy of the CFT or we’re witnessing intelligent design.My money is on the second possibility do I suspect foul play(both are entangled).

This question may seem unrelated at first but Mark van Raamsdonk mentioned worm holes between two connected space times here goes. If some physicists disprove quantum entanglement by arguing "communication" between two entangled particles can't travel faster than the speed of light then is one counter argument that whatever "connects" those two particle may contain a very tiny "worm hole" if you will of space-time that is stretched so thinly it would compress the distance inside the "worm hole" thereby shrinking the real distance and thereby allowing faster than light travel, at least for information? Think of the proverbial "warp drive" that distorted space-time and allowed the Enterprise to travel at the speed of light. That of course is impossible given the energy needed to distort space-time in such a way. BUT if that space-time was super tiny and stretched out, say between two entangled particles then the energy needed to distort space-time would be achievable. In that case the star ship Enterprise would be a tiny packet of information. Essentially the distortion of space-time would mean the two particles are right next to each other and therefor the information passed between them is instantaneous when measured from the entangled particles' frame of reference even though from our perspective they might be millions of miles apart.

Hasn't Penrose's Objection Reduction been making the connection between spacetime geometry and entanglement since the 80's?

[Physical World, Truth World and Life‘s Consciousness: Correct Meaning of Entanglement in Quantum Mechanics] In quantum mechanics, the exact notion of entanglement does not mean that a physical signal is transmitted at an infinite speed, but always the truth (or reason, or absolutely right logic) is always present everywhere, regardless of the space and time of the physical world. There is no way that physical signal or any person’s consciousness can be transferred to remote places at infinite speed, but it is possible that the same logic is being physically carried out simultaneously in different places. If you know that the same (or correlated) logic is on processing in other places, you can think the physical signal or consciousness being delivered at an infinite speed. Imagine the coupled entities that are operating synchronously far away. If you check the state of one entity, you can decide the states of remote coupled entities. There should never be any confusion between physical and logical things. Understand exactly that the physical worlds are the cases in which some of the myriad of reasons are realized by means of material, and that the laws of physics for changing things include unchanging logic of mathematics. If you know that the most bottom of the physical world is the immaterial logic world, and on the above of it, the physical worlds of energy exist, and again on top of it, the worlds of quantum matter exist, you can understand the entanglement phenomena without any confusion. OnCharm Lee (Author of the book “Humans & Truth - human life is the awakening process”)

49:10 for a proposed experiment of relavent theories

"This is a one state system" - Draws an alien hieroglyph that does nothing. "This is a two state system" - Draws the inputs for a Boolean table Teaching this guy the binary numbering system would blow his mind.

Great talk, though I wish we could see what he was pointing at.

“The origin of momentum creation is founded on the application of energy. Momentum serves as the initial cause of pushing and pulling. The energy, emanating from the internal core of a planet, is what gives rise to momentum, commonly referred to as gravity, and not due to the planet’s size, mass, or space-time curvature. For example, when energy is applied, it generates the necessary momentum for the actions of pushing and pulling. Without the application of energy, momentum cannot be established. Consequently, force cannot be exerted for pushing and pulling, as it lacks a physical existence. This, in turn, clarifies why force is not gravity.” ~Guadalupe Guerra

it must repeat distribution of given entangled space if gravity is a constant in a given area

the geometry may change with the addition of virtual particles, because concave against convex parts of the geometry

I'm only at 3:50 of the video so I haven't much to say about the topic but What a rockstar is Susskind, I'd like to meet him, I'd love to attend lectures from him in person.

a elastic limit?

Does this theory imply spacetime is hyperbolic, or is that just a mathematical tool?

Two years ago I saw this video, but didn't know of quantum coherent theory, when a state can repeat its measurement, from a previous measurement. The reason how this measurement can be repeated (from infinite states) is due to gravity. Enabling Maldacena combine QM and GR for his ADS/CFT theory, for which he is rightly called the Einstein of modern physics. All credit to Mark van Raamsdonk, for taking to new heights of ADS/CFT theory, promising to discover how classical object have unitary evolution from Schrodinger's wave functions. I don't doubt that Mark did explain how quantum gravity follows from ADS/QFT, I think in the last two years of publishing his findings the complete theory of QM, with coherence and the boundary between quantum and classical, should have been able to explain how classical objects like star, planets, BH, etc are formed. I even believe QC function leading to life and consciousness should have been kickstarted by now.

This is brilliant! I think I finally understand the deep connection between entanglement, entropy of a black hole and quantum gravity.

12:20 - 13:00 a bit convoluted explanation - he should have done it better, because, as it says on the slide, i'ts a "Crucial Point".

Please, just please, enable subtitles. Even the automatic ones are good for me, english is not my main language and I'll miss half of what's being said without subtitles Q.Q

I think a Navier-Stokes approach to Quantum Relativity would be interesting.

The energy, which is being applied from within the planet's core, is what creates gravity and not because of the size of the planet, its mass, or by space-time curvature. Gravity cannot exist without applied energy. ~Guadalupe Guerra

Wait, great question, makes me think, does entanglement decay over time?

Very elegant!

Is this saying that entanglement is the force carrier for gravity?

58:38 so gravity isn't it's own thing anymore? What then did LIGO detect? A change in the amount of entanglement in quantum fields? Entanglement of what? If the entanglement inside one black hole already is maximal - when two of them merge, do they increase their entanglement even more by synchronising? While the gravitational wave that was released carries away / transfers energy, does it also lower entanglement on it's way out, does it flip spins or whatever qualia count as "entangelable"? This is all very confusing...

How relationship quantum gravity to strings theory

Can gravity be entanglement?

*grins* Just what I was thinking over many loops time as matter interacts over many cycles start and reset

Hawking made an attempt to explain entanglement in The Nature Of Space And Time(p.39-60) by a thought experiment in which two black holes moving apart from each other as , in fact, the same black hole.

To which Quantum reality this entangled entropy subscribes to.? Is’t observer created reality the mathematical underpinning? Not raining on the parade just yet?

"so your saying you have platform of existance, you have fluctuations of the platform of existence, and extreme conditions of the platform of existence" inspired by genius s.

It is simple quantum entanglement create extra gravity which is dark energy. Problem maybe solved. Non locality phenomena is a force contributing to space higher deformation.

My god his suit is timeless.

I didn't understand any of this other than that quantum entanglement may be fundamental to spacetime. I guess I'll have to wait for Brian Greene, NDGT and Brain Cox to explain it to me in terms I can understand. It's a very interesting new development if true.

So-quantum entanglement slows light (photons) by modifying Maxwell's coefficients... That makes sense that it increases the reluctance (inertial density) of space (vacuum)... and the slowing of light bends it like gravity, by Huygen's principle, (particles too as self-convolved photons... I received a sci.math/physics KOOK award for that ca 1995-8).

So does this match Penrose’s conformal cosmology ? Are we in a fractal multiverse of black holes? Can entangled Villenkin tunneling from the sub plank space of an event horizon explain the creation of a cosmological gradient of vacuum spaces within the black hole? Can one think of the famous E8 structure as a very convoluted Feynman diagram explaining all particle interactions? Haha

1:10:00 I wonder what the upper bound is

"we can JUST use entropy" => but why ? , my guess is, entropy is "good" because it is "additive", or, in other words, "extensive", so it has the property that if you double the size of the system then entropy doubles too ... it is linear in the size of the system (in classical TD), I guess there is some similar reason why entropy is "good" for measuring the "size" of entanglement, possibly, because if you combine two systems, then it makes sense that the "size" of the entanglement in the combined system is the sum of the "sizes" of entanglements in its parts ... my little guess... why "JUST" :) , well, I think this is the reason for the "JUST"

What I would REALLY like is experiments that show, for example, control of gravitational force in this case by manipulation of entanglement... Else all the math.. epicycles... string theory .. too many black holes.... do not lose touch with reality. When people came up with the steam engine, the math came later. We need stuff that works.

I don't really have enough basic knowledge to determine how good or bad this lecture. However, I still don't get why there is the need to combine gravity with quantum mechanics.

Have these ideas gone anywhere since this?

The Gravitational Instability Cosmological Theory on the Formation of the Universe When the Universe started to fall . When did Motion Start ? (1) The expansion of the universe is a result of the " heat ' contained therein; (2) The source of the " heat " is the cosmic microwave radiation background at 3 kelvin, wherein; (3) The microwave electro magnetic-nuclear energy was formed as a result of the interaction of two different static gravitational vacuum fields, causing gravitational instability and the motion, void of matter, at this time, wherein; static gravitational field (1) began to go into "motion". Therefore; the interaction of (2) motionless / static gravity vacuum fields, could eventually create dust particles in the Universe that later form into stars, galaxies , planets, moons and other objects in or about their current locations. When did motion first start ? Science knows the formation of matter in our universe was caused by the forces of the universe. These forces are: (1) The Force of Gravity (2) The Force of Electro Magnetism (3) The Strong Nuclear Force (4) The Weak Nuclear Force At some point in time, motion within the universe, had to begin. The paradox would be, what force could cause motion to begin, without moving in its present space-time ? The Gravitational Cosmological Theory was developed from an is rooted in the Einstein Steady State Theory and the Bondi-Gold-Hoyle Steady State Theory, Wherein the Steady State Theory the universe, contains more protons than electrons that create dust particles and galaxies formed in their current locations and the cosmic matter is recycled therein at the center of the galaxy furnace. ------------ When the Universe started to fall: The Gravitational Instability Cosmological Theory on the Formation of the Universe. The Theory: (1) The expansion of the universe is a result of the " heat ' contained therein; (2) The source of the " heat " is the cosmic microwave radiation background at 3 kelvin, wherein; (3) The microwave electro magnetic-nuclear energy was formed as a result of the interaction of two different static gravitational vacuum fields, causing gravitational instability and the motion, void of matter, at this time, wherein; static gravitational field (1) began to go into "motion". Therefore; the interaction of (2) motionless / static gravity vacuum fields, could eventually create dust particles in the Universe that later form into stars, galaxies , planets, moons and other objects in or about their current locations. Q: When did this motion start? A: If a neutral particle is able to resist the universal motion, in theory, that particle would go back in time. Going back in time the neutral particle would then enter into (1) of the (2) motionless-static gravity vacuum fields void of motion, and cause an unbalance and gravitational instability and this interaction would create motion and energy particles. Q: What causes a gravitational static vacuum field in the first place ? A: Pressure force is used to create a vacuum on Earth, perhaps an exotic something 100,000 times weaker than the force of gravity decays, causing a static-motionless gravity vacuum field. Q: What created the motionless gravity vacuum fields in the first place ? A: Vacuums are created by pressure so the only answer I can think of is a created gravity vacuum pressure from the future goes back in time to start motion in the past. ( DRI 2002, the theory needs improvement - help yourself )

Could this make any sense? Black holes without singularity and systems below the Planck scales Reference: An observer falling into a black hole observing something that is also falling into a black hole just before it: If an outside observer never observes an in-falling observer ever fall into the black hole, any particle entering the black hole should feel nothing else to be inside the black hole but only itself; because just before it entered the black hole, everything that was about to enter the black before it froze at the event horizon, so there is nothing inside the black hole but just that particle. This would mean that there would be no singularity. Second option-Now let’s say that it would feel everything to be normal-that is see its predecessors fall into the black hole and that only those outside observers accelerating away from the black hole see things freezing on the surface of the black hole. For that to happen, when the same observer is moving towards the black hole, observes things going in; but when accelerating away observes things clumping up on the horizon. If that were to happen, every time the observer went back and forth the clumping would freeze and unfreeze. Third-Or if an outside observer maintaining a constant distance from the black hole is the one that observes the clumping. When the observer moved away, if the things unfroze, entering the black hole; relativistic predictions would be incorrect. Inside the black hole: I like to talk about the first interpretation-the violation of the extrapolation of the geometry inside the black hole-that there is no singularity. If we add some definitions to the idea, it looks familiar to a question, we’ve been asking and the incomprehensible answer we’ve been getting. First, the observer sees no non-virtual particles. However, high energy virtual particles pop into and out of existence frequently. When one of such particle deforms space-time, it forms temporary gravitational influence on the “only one” non-virtual particle-“observer” before shortly ceasing to exist and no more influencing the non-virtual particle. Another virtual particle comes into existence somewhere inside the black hole and temporarily pulls the non-virtual particle in a different direction (could be the same) with different intensity depending on their relative positions. As many virtual particles pop into existence, the particle is pulled around and pulled in some other direction while some virtual particles cease to exist and some other new virtual particles come into existence. The non-virtual particle is pulled around inside the black hole in this field of virtual particles; never quite achieving the influence to escape the black hole. It could be helpful to imagine the idea as a yo-yo being pulled back and forth, allowing the movement in all directions and the intensities to be different. The same idea can be described in a different way. The space-time inside the black hole is a high energy deformation in the portion of space-time where, as virtual particles pop into and out of existence, powerful gravitational waves move the non-virtual particle around, inside the black hole. The gravitational waves are the result of virtual particles coming into and out of existence, producing different patterns of gravitational strong fields. Explaining a very similar answer; and amazing consequences Length below the Planck length leads to answers that there should be black holes everywhere below the Planck length. While that might tell us that we don’t understand it so well, it could very well be telling us a different story this whole time. Maybe the reason systems below the Planck scales give rise to black hole scenarios is because what happens inside a black hole is very similar to what happens inside a Planck length-what happens to space-time. Below the Planck scale, space-time is not empty and virtual particles coming into existence and going out of existence make up the vacuum energy field, as well accepted. Every point in space-time is stretched, as virtual particles come into existence as the vacuum energy field fluctuation. This is exactly like the first definition we established about what happens inside the black hole. The high energy virtual particles coming into and out of existence inside the black hole, cause gravitational influence because the gravitational waves are localized. Similarly, the virtual particles coming into an out of existence in vacuum field, stretch space-time at a lot of points (theoretically all points) and in a lot of all directions (theoretically all directions), creating the effect observed as Dark Energy. There is one more definition we need to add here. As, the virtual particles inside the black holes come into and out of the existence, the virtual particles coming into and out of existence that make up the vacuum energy field-do so at inside the Planck-scales, let’s say inside the Planck volume. Since, the two phenomenon are extremely similar, that is why we get an answer that there should be black holes below the Planck scales, when we compute the prediction of our theories. But more than being similar, the two phenomena could be two observations of a single phenomenon. The Hawking Radiation and conservation of information It could very well be the case that the matter eaten by black holes in our universe appear as virtual particles in space-time outside the black holes; and that explaining why “inside the Planck scale phenomenon” and “inside the black hole phenomenon” are the same thing. Now the way this model can elegantly describe the hawking radiation or quantum tunneling as the property of the particles inside the black holes to appear outside the black holes as quantum vacuum field fluctuations-(the reason such systems are described as quantized at the Planck scales can be better discussed by explaining the Schwarzschild radius); And this does not violate information conservation. And black holes turn out to be converting matter into vacuum energy diluting the energy in our universe. An unanswered question: revisiting group splitting All along this time, we did not answer why the particle inside the black hole observes no other non-virtual particle. This idea is described using the splitting of a group; the central idea in this discussion. A black hole has the following property. Before entering the black hole, some matter can interact with each other in space and are described as being in the same system in the “volume neighborhood” or less seriously-space. A black hole can split this system into many systems that cannot interact in the “volume neighborhood”. According to the idea of group reconfiguration, space-time is the geometry of group configurations while volume neighborhood or dimension is one such configuration. However, the particles may interact in “other dimensions or neighborhoods”, and hence appear as virtual particles to each other in the volume neighborhood, and are able to convey gravitational influence as they continue to have defined geometries of group configurations- or less seriously interactions with space-time. According to the evolving dynamics of group reconfiguration, the virtual particles come into existence and cease to exist. But what happens when all black holes run out of food to eat? The universe could be left with just vacuum energy field fluctuations with virtual particles popping into and out of existence. Our universe’s geometry to interact in volume-neighborhood could be gone while the energy of our universe (as particles) may continue to interact in other configurations and neighborhoods. Virtual particles may form real particles. The universe could split into different systems or combine with some other system. The universe could lose its quantization as black holes disappear taking away with them the vacuum energy fluctuation making the system continuous. The continuity could be disturbed when something else interacts with our system in a big bang.

Einstein would freak out knowing that entanglement underlies his spacetime (if this proposition is true)

Moscow Aviation Institute - MAI - International Student's Page has given the following the thumbs up. It's all clearly correct. The Institute of Physics, Patna has now given the following writing the thumbs up. Excellent.♥️ THE MATHEMATICAL PROOF THAT ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY IN A BALANCED FASHION IS SUCCESSFULLY DEMONSTRATED: "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. THE SUN AND THE EARTH are F=ma AND E=mc2, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 is DIRECTLY AND FUNDAMENTALLY DERIVED FROM F=ma. F=ma AND E=mc2 PROVE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This explains F=ma AND E=mc2, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. SO, GRAVITATIONAL FORCE/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ACCORDINGLY, ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/AS what is BALANCED ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL FORCE/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT !!! Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. INDEED, A PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course); as the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Great. The ability of thought to DESCRIBE OR RECONFIGURE sensory experience is ULTIMATELY dependent upon the extent to which THOUGHT IS SIMILAR TO sensory experience. (THOUGHTS ARE INVISIBLE.) Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is FULLY INVISIBLE AND black. The perpetual motion of WHAT IS THE EARTH is NOW explained. GREAT !!! The idea that THE PLANETS are "falling" in what is "curved space" in RELATION to what is THE SUN is PROVEN to be NONSENSE. So, the falling objects must be considered in RELATION to WHAT IS THEN THE ORBITING EARTH. GREAT !!!!!!!!!! By Frank DiMeglio

My hypothesis that Dark Matter is not a WIMP, but maybe is a deformation of space-time by which the curvature of space-time ALONE is the cause of the gravitational effect. Gravity is the consequence of the curvature of space-time. It may be possible that the structure of space-time itself could be warped without the presence of mass. Space-time has been shown to react like a fabric by warping, twisting, and propagating independent of mass. These properties have been proven with observations of gravitational lensing, frame dragging, and now gravitational waves. Fabrics can be stretched, pressured, and/or heated to the point of deformation. Such extreme conditions were all present during inflation, so it is plausible that space-time’s elastic nature could have hit its yield point and permanently deformed. Therefore, if gravity is the consequence of the warping of space-time, and fabrics can be permanently deformed, then a deformation could create a gravitational effect independent of mass. Thus, the unidentified dark "matter" that seems to be so elusive to modern science may not be matter at all but merely warped deformities causing gravitational effects. DM could be a microscopic black hole with no mass at the center... Prediction: Spacetime's elastic property hits a yield point, so only that part of geodesic's "stretch marks" would remain after inflation stopped. These steep gravitational wells would not follow the inverse square law. I am looking for Theorists or Experimentalists to help me develop ways to test this hypothesis. Is there a way observationally to test it’s gravity does not follow the inverse square law?