I may have solved that 200 year old mystery of the double slit experiment. But.. Nobody cares that you can not detect a single photon without 'touching' it. A lot of misunderstandings about the experiment setup and nobody cares..

Had to rewind #9 ten times. Wow. Great work!

​@@rodglen7071 committed ❤😂

Light behaves different if its being observed. Not if im looking or not. What you said implies it is consciousness that is required for observation and that might not be the case.

... That these processions of energy particles appear as wave phenomena when subjected to certain observations is due to the resistance of the undifferentiated force blanket of all space, the hypothetical ether, and to the intergravity tension of the associated aggregations of matter. 42:5.15 (476.1) The excitation of the content of space produces a wavelike reaction to the passage of rapidly moving particles of matter, just as the passage of a ship through water initiates waves of varying amplitude and interval.

Same here. Its crazy that the outcome changes just by looking at ot. I believe thats because you can only be in one dimension at a time.

It's what made me realise that when Jesus says "God moves in mysterious ways" he was really saying "sometimes the universe can be counter intuitive..."

@@redfernpixelgnomepitcher1377the very fact that particles will travel back in time to change an outcome tells me it’s under intelligent control.

reality is an illusion that depends on consciousness

@@Webedunn There's no time travel involved

Inattentive ADD

Thanks for the awesome new age story!

Until when you're supposed to get up 🤦‍♂️

You shouldn't use devices during the night. It will keep you awake no matter what you watch.

Well, if you got at least one cycle of rem sleep, it's probably okay.

Sorry to say, but don't take too much of what these videos take to heart. They are half truths dressed up with VERY bad information and philosophical mumbo jumbo

Yes þat would be cool. Surprisingly low likes on your comment so here's a like and comment.🎉

thank you

@@impaler331 It's because I finished almost a week later, @syiunshi made her comment on the day of upload, but there were significant problems with hers (like unprofessional titles and jumbled up order), so I decided to do it properly myself. The 'low' engagement is a reflection of the fact that viewership tails off after the first few days of upload.

Thank you so much. I almost just closed the window at 2 minutes in because the intro was boringly slow. This schematic keeps me around for a little longer probably. Edit: I stopped watching again. too many sidesteps that are not important. I gave up.

@@dreamsagaofficial It's not a documentary, though. It's a compilation of videos that were originally separate, so it's perfectly valid to watch them in multiple sessions. Further, not everyone has the prior knowledge to understand the complicated experiments first time 'round. The reason why I bothered to manually create chapters was a) I fell asleep to this the first time round without pausing, so it would've come in handy to pick up where I left off, and b) someone had done it poorly (no offence to the person who was only trying to help), which irked me.

tq for your knowledge

:-) Thank you also for "All those bleached out corals have recovered by the way and are doing fine."

Hmmm, why aren't there any green stars?...

@@joshuasukup2488 As temperature goes up it goes from red, orange, yellow, white and the hottest stars are blue. No green, but white light is made up of red green and blue. All colors come from those three.

@@ingathomas6653 Funny how they don't report about the recovery isn't it?

Light doesn't have a speed. It has a rate of refraction. It's rate speeds up and slows down - depending on the medium it perturbating.

just like ronsimpson8666 said, there by definition is no velocity because light has no mass.

Light is fluid

@@eliteextremophile8895 light doesnt have a speed, it has a 'rate of refraction' for whatever "medium" it's refracting through'. ❤️✌️

Bunch of 🤓 in this thread

VEINY PUERTO RICAN KOK FORCED INTO A WATERMELON AND IT BLASTED THE WATERMELON IN THE ASS!

Cherish those moments and take every chance you can to reconnect. Never know when it’ll be your last, I’ve lost 2 of my brothers and I regret not reaching out more. I regret it everyday

How wonderful ❤ I used to do the same with my brother, he was taken way too soon from this world, but he will always be a part of mine ❤

Astrum; Keepin' the love alive. That would be a great motto for the channel.

Thanks guys, :)

Is it possible to include a 3rd phase on the delayed choice gate? with a 3rd detector (still only reflect or not on the first gate, so 2 phases)

A bunch of clips in this video have appeared in previous Astrum videos, and are being reused here.

Why did you put it in some weird order?

It's a supercut! This weird light series was written with the intention to put the individual episodes into one long episode afterwards, and this is the end result.

Exist enial ? Who is reading it?

This is the greatest joke of all time. Did you make it up?

Well said sir..however I will say that I am very grateful for all the brilliant minds who over the decades have tried to shed light on the nature of light..I'm just a lay person who also loves physics..but understanding it is very difficult for me...btw just for info, at the 35:49 mark the correct name should be John Stewart Bell, not Steward, perhaps just misspelled. An excellent video to look at if you care...EINSTEIN'S QUANTUM RIDDLE..I enjoyed it thoroughly.

Anyone who says they understand 😂 it’s not that hard to understand you changed the experiment by observing it? Schrödinger cat mate you should not make so many assumptions

If you can get past what you think about other people… you might know we can see the same event twice…. So fabric of time can have different paths. The same light has reached us at different times. I wouldn’t want too be 58 and be so narrow minded and at the same time be enlightened by my own thoughts and opinions

I think we just haven't invented the correct sensors to properly observe light and quantum entangled particles. Like how our eyes can't see the shorter wavelengths of light. It's there, but we can't see it with the default sensors.

If you gotta poo...make it a stinky poo. The stinkiest poo's...are sometimes the most satisfying 😌 💩

I had a 51-minute video about a Mars rock in my sidebar for a couple weeks last year. Yeah, I'm not going to sit through that much video on a rock, but in morbid curiosity, I clicked... Then, I watched the entire thing, was deeply entertained and learned stuff, and have been a subscriber since. Welcome to the club!

​@@mattstone8878 Fool

Check out the books by Phil Hine

I knew about the double slit but not in regards to TIME! Blithering babooshkas!

50:51 I'm going to the casino at this point. 😂😂😂😂

Yeah... the universe is a joker.

One explosion saved another from occurring elsewhere in your body... potentially... I bet you ate it anyway ;)

@@Weelki eventually my fatass succumbed to the burrito but not until the next day 😂

@@NefariousTV This is the way.

Interesting theory to dive in 🤔

I have a different theory of my own but it's difficult to explain in a comment section but I do discuss it with friends that are aligned towards astronomy.

Most electromagnetic phenomena are elastic interactions actually, the vibration of a photon has no damping and is therefor an idealized elastic phenomena

That sounds wrong (so it might be right) mainly because if the photon exists on the entire timeline, why don’t we see ALL photons at once ?

@@nicodesmidt4034 mate im still stuck on "how on earth is this table made of atoms when i can feel it "

All types of radar? What's your opinion of Radar Love?

You would know how radar detects a ship far over the horizon. Does radar 'bend' somehow?

@@jthepickle7 Put the radar transmitter/receiver on a pole.

@@jthepickle7it doesn’t bend, but reflects. It’s know as (over the horizon) radar. They reflect the radar beam off the ionosphere.

I assume electricity also bent your wits. I'm convinced that nobody understands it but just has handy procedures to manage it, somewhat.

My thoughts exactly. Light may not be interferring with the past but the limitations of our tech give that impression

Agreed, My way of saying it is " When God said"Let there be light it was already dark"

1 candle of light and darkness flees!

Yes dark is the absence of light

Neutral density filters?

@@chudleyflusher7132 I’m not sure what those are but it sounds good. :)

@@stephanieparker1250 According to ChatGPT: ND filters don't apply here. To generate individual photons, one common method is Spontaneous Parametric Down-Conversion (SPDC), where a high-energy photon splits into two lower-energy entangled photons. By controlling experimental conditions, these photon pairs can be emitted sequentially. Another approach involves using atoms or molecules in excited states, which can emit individual photons as they return to lower energy states. These methods require precise control and often involve optical devices like beam splitters and mirrors. Detection systems are crucial for identifying and recording individual photons. Overall, creating controlled conditions and manipulating quantum states are key to generating and observing individual photons.

@@chudleyflusher7132Q-36 Space Modulator. Or can we say any 3 words with 0 context and pass it off as information?

They just politely ask photon to behave.

Bro donated a money to a AI science spam content farm 💀

I believe the word was "existennial"

Brilliant? :D

Illuminating? :D :D

​@@BoxOfCurryoswhat are you on about

So because the photon is chrono dialated to the point time is at a standstill when observing it we lock it into a defined path therefore it was always that way? How does this work when going through mediums that slow the speed of light?

This is a good question and if i could answer it with ease, i would not work as an automechanic but as a quanto mechanic 😂

​@@carcarcool6262there is a theory that light is slowed down in materials because light is basically moving waves of electromagnetic fields which interfere with the electrons which have their electromagnetic fields of their own. when light passes through materia, an electromagnetic wave in opposit direction is created which Shows slows down the light.

​@@carcarcool6262 a photon is basically a wave packet in the electromagnetic field. In vacuum there is nothing that interacts with that wave -> C. In matter there are protons and electrons moving. Moving charges have their own Interaction with electromagnetic fields. a passing excitment with "A" frequency a (photon) hasnt a free path but hast to interact with the charges in that Medium with the frequency "B". Laying over those frequencys with A>>B we get frequency C somewere inbetween A>C>B. Slower frequency, means slower passing through.

Single photons have wavelike properties

@@paulryan94 ?

@@Dennistube001 You say "so perhaps light is waves of particles". This is not true. Single photon experiments show that the wavelike properties of light can be ascribed to the single photons themselves. And so the wavelike properties of light are not an emergent phenomenon of an ensemble of particles.

@@paulryan94 ?. the wave patterns seen from the double slit exp are not caused by 1 photon. more like an acumilation of particle hits leaving a pattern. yet i see it says Each photon behaves like a wave. so thats a total existence falure of my logic.

@@Dennistube001 there are double slit and other experiments that use single photons. This is of central importance to QM. The individual photons/ electrons/ etc act as waves or particles.

There is no law of quantum mechanics except orbits being quantized.....Since primary mechanism of light production happens to be jumping electrons across orbits, light happens to be quantized but doesn't have to be. Radio & microwaves r equally EM waves ie light waves, but they aren't quantized. They never say a photon of radio wave. We must do these light tests on these invisible waves.

Ahhh..the pros n cons of over- thinking

Creamating is not a word, but should be.

it is not backwards time traveling

@@Special1122 didn't say it was

I don't understand the confusion. Waves propagate until they are measured. So, surely, the wave propagates down both routes in all scenarios. When there is only one detector, the probability distribution collapses to a single detector with 50/50 probability when it reaches the defectors. When you introduce a second beam splitter after the wave has propagated through the first, the wave interacts with it when it reaches it and its probability distribution is affected accordingly. What am I missing?

This is exactly what I was thinking, but I'm no physicist.

Yes, I wanted to add the same comment. There is no before, or after, from the perspective of the light. Same thing explains the time split experiment. If you send two photons one after the other, they can still create the interference pattern as time does not exist for them.

I got high as hell one day and just.... Realised this on my own. And then I got really freaked out, because yeah, to light, everything is instant. And my mind broke as I realised time is a lie based on perception.... Weed and physics together is fun. :D

In that case I wonder what the results would be if tested in a dense medium such as glass or that cloud mentioned earlier in the video.

The speed of light is non constant and might be slowed down dramatically, the experiment might have been executed on these conditions

I love you

I concur! HuygensOptics seems to me to demystify the duality. Basically, an electromagnetic wave is spread (unequally) in space and can vary in magnitude continuously following the inverse square rule. BUT - to interact with a highly localized atom or molecule, it is all or none - a quantum event that happens or doesn't, and follows the probabilties of quantum mechanics. It is the receptor atom that has quantum & highly localized properties, not the wave.

Wander or wonder? Was that just a typo?

@@MGForums fingers and a whiskey lol

Exactly - I realized this 30 years ago, as there's no way to produce a single wave in any medium. Unfortunately this produces a lot of brain farts, like this video - explaining "the obvious" in obscure and illogical ways. Nature is always extremely simple when we actually learn the basics, so forget about time travel and entanglement, this is just the human mind getting carried away...

how so?

​@@liranxs I can't vouch for Ryan's assertion, but Sabine Hossenfelder's video on the topic is the best example of that argument.

Isn't all of this just misunderstanding. Every time he makes partials think/feel/decide/want, it just irks the hell out of me. The efforts of this world to make us all "stupider" astounds me. Throw out all of the assumptions and untruths. why do they make up these narratives. Simple answer is they have nothing of substance to say but they still need funding...

Awesome😂

smart suggestion but that beam of light will act as a photon ( particle ) since its wave function will collapse by our act on it

@@Mel-jf9gxinteresting!

how is checking all paths by light more efficient than simply one straight path

Oh, you too lol It's fascinating... most lightning starts from the ground up, not from the sky towards the ground. I guess that is besides the point but... When it comes to light, I think, it may not be the "enforcer" in its situation, but rather as a string being plucked - by something, _someone._ But how does one "end" go from "dark" to "light" ... this is when I started thinking about lightning

@@SebHaarfagre oh you get it for sure! I like that. Merry Christmas 🎄

​@@SebHaarfagreThe Aether

Agreed!

Now you can make better photos

photons = magic

agreed! I try to do magic every day via some melted down sand thing infront of a computer thing and hopefully its in focus. @@covert0overt_810

Oh come on, you call it observing but in reality, you are checking the light with an instrument that changes the energy of the photon, it has nothing to do with actual observation like watching it from a human perspective.

@@Rudyard_Stripling Just admit that you didn't understand the video, FFS. Because you didn't.

You are the one who can't understand the difference between taking a measurement and observing. You are clueless and easily fooled. Boy, Was I Wrong! How the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser Really works Arvin Ash 917K subscribers Join Subscribed @@ProfessorJayTee

@@Rudyard_Stripling You do realize that your eyes are an instrument, right?

Einstein was the biggest scientific fraud in history.

Boy, Was I Wrong! How the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser Really works Arvin Ash 917K subscribers

reality is only rendered on demand thus conserving energy - no one needs a reality if there is no one around. It would be creepy as well. Some reality just sitting there unobserved is going to spawn some ultra reality for its fun.

@@kparker2430 That's what the My Big T.O.E. guy thinks is going on. That implies that reality is a construct of the mind. Seems plausible but I guess we won't ever really know.

@@aregeebee201 ok

I have a sneaking suspicion that this is correct, at least inasmuch as there's something wonky and completely baffling about electromagnetism in general.

I've been looking for other people who also think that time is a spatial dimension for decades. So, in your opinion, is that what you believe or is the 4th dimension something besides time? I believe so because of the information I got before and the instant my sister died in 77. And since then I've, also, thought that it would explain the double slit exp. and behavior of electrons, and probably the instantaneous nature of gravity and the electric force. But so far, every one who believes in higher spacial dimensions makes it a religious issue. And standard theory has the time dimension as some other thing. But I have been thinking that time is a spacial dimension for a long time.

@@fleetwoodbeechbum "Time" is abstract, I do not think time to be a dimension at all, but the 4th dimension would be a fully an actual physical one we cannot perceive, yet we exist within it. Think of it this way, lower dimensions can exist within our 3-dimensional universe, we can draw a dot on a piece of paper, a line, a circle. A 3-dimensional being can explain "height" to a 2-dimensional being, but make him/her understand it is another matter. (No point of reference.) So by this logic, our 3-dimensional universe exists within a 4th or 5th physical dimensional universe, and light is one of those little exceptions to the rule, so it sneaks through dimensions as it travels, but becomes fixed as it's measured. We humans, think ourselves "advanced" we can perceive the 3 dimensions in our universe, but we are very limited, we can walk forwards and backwards, left or right, but we have very limited capacity to move up or down, heck, birds and fish beat us by moving in 3 dimensions far more easily than us, it is very likely that birds and fish have a very small perception of the 4th dimension, since they have a far better grasp of the 3rd dimension than us. If you ever see someone walk through a wall without breaking it, try to ask that person what dimension he or she or it came from, since it moved 'sideways' to pass through the wall.

@@LoneTiger The only genuinely 2-dimensional "thing" I can think of is a shadow.

Well, light travels at the speed of light, so relativity tells us that it experiences no time. Fast through space, slow through time.

i like how that theory can be brilliant or absolutely hilarious :) we will never know

Some good weed?

Interesting

There are no "higher" dimensions

​@@AverageAlien classic alien, always correcting people as if they too got to see the Flormb dimension 😒 nothing's higher when you've got to see it all

I believe they have, and even have a computer randomly decide AFTER the test to decide for us whether or not we become an observer. Still didn't trick it. It's wild lol

The double split experiment is the most misunderstood experiment in physics. The problem is in the detection, they say "simply by observing it it changes" That's an incorrect description of what happens though. Let's say me and you are in a dark room with absolutely no light. I'm in the corner making no sound. How would you know I'm there? You would have to find a way to detect me. The easiest way would be to turn a light on. Hey look! I'm over there! The problem is In order to see me, you had to touch me. You had to bounce photons off of me and then receive them. So by the very nature of observing something you have to perturb it. By doing so you change it collapsing the wave function. It's not observing the data that changes it it's the sensor being on that changes it.

@@Aaronjpolk no it isn't though. It's a huge anomaly in quantum physics and if it was as simple as 'oh equipment changes it from wave to particle' they would have realized. The sensor does not pick it up until information has already been processed (in this case, photons have already passed through the slit). The sensor is picking up on the wave/photon AFTER the slit, but the photon is 'deciding' its move BEFORE the slit. So if it was changed from wave to particle after sensor, and not the slit, we would have completely different results. Example being photons dispersed in areas that should be shadows, if it was changed due to the post-slit sensor.

@@oldmanballs787 you stopped making sense after "the sensor is picking up on the wave/photon AFTER the slit" That is absolutely wrong even though this video points it out. Stop watching UKposts hits for your physics information.

@@oldmanballs787 from the most recent published paper on Harvard EDU "younge's double split with quantum eraser" "In our previous paper1 we pointed out that, strictly speak- ing, we are not detecting single photons of light but rather single photoelectrons liberated by the light impinging on the detector; this is still true in the present experiment." Tell us your "physics" education is from UKposts without telling us.

Sounds good.

Lighting starts from the ground…..

@@thomasmyers9128 No.

@@thomasmyers9128 not really, but that doesn't matter. There is a volume of air through which the ionization propagates until one path connects the cloud to the ground, at which point the entire charge that was spreading through the air rushes into the established path. In a sense, the lightning is like a wave that is traveling through the air and collapses into a single path upon contact. It's not a scientifically accurate conparison but that's the best description I can think of.

From inception, you have failed. Lightning is a collapse. Not a ground to cloud bolt of fiction. You're not in Kindergarten anymore. *"reverse-tree-like pattern" You mean a Fractal?

Trueeee

I often imagine him narrating murder mysteries.

But he said existinial in stead of existential in the intro. Besides that, good narrator for sure.

I suspect this guy's descriptions might be hotly contested by elite exerimental physicists.

This caught my attention too. I'm so easily annoyed when I come across these misspellings and mispronunciations (particularly when apostrophes are involved). Oh well...

The more you know, the more you learn how little you actually know. In order to know the gaps in your knowledge you must fill some space

That is Until we know sh*t. Then the sh*t changes when we check. And finally, we're back to not knowing sh*t. Thus the cycle continues. 🙏🏾🙏🏾

@@JVP_thephobic it only changes when we check because measuring requires the energy to interact with other particles. There is another level which EM exists on where the energy goes out in every direction and is divided infinitely. Since it goes out equally in every direction, but it still has to choose a path of least resistance, it will choose a random direction (no specific path requires less energy than the others) unless it is impossible to choose a specific direction like with entanglement. On our level of reality, the physical medium which we see the effects of EM energy through, that energy cannot be divided below a certain threshold. Thats why we see the particle, the lowest unit of measurement for that energy. Therefore, it is infinifely divided until the energy has to go somewhere, at which point it turns back into a particle and the ripple of infinitely divisible energy starts again until it his something that causes it to be indivisible below a certain level again (something being interacting with the physical world in any way). Much like the lightning bolt analogy, the energy explores every path until it finds one to collapse down. The EM field cannot be detected, but we can only measure the impacts it has on our reality. There are two layers of reality interacting here, and we have only half of the picture

Yup. That's about right.

I am knowing.

If you want to un-befuddle yourself, I recommend Sabine Hossenfelder’s video on the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser.

I find this being one of thousands of trash channels of which videos are just filled with stock video clips. Utter trash, waste of time. I'd move to Sabine Hossenfelder also, no stock video clips..

it reminded me of the book and TV series "His Dark Materials" where there is a substance/particle called "Dust" which has conciousness

That still doesnt explain the last experiment

@@maxveldman2789 I'll google what a beam splitter is and get back to you.

Yes, it does.Oh come on, you call it observing but in reality, you are checking the light with an instrument that changes the energy of the photon, it has nothing to do with actual observation like watching it from a human perspective. @@maxveldman2789

Wave, Particle Duality, Better explanation? It is only an idea on my part but it goes something like this: 1. Charged particles have their associated magnetic fields with them. 2. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them. 3. Photons also have both an electrical and magnetic components to them. 4. Whenever a proton, electron, or photon is shot out of a gun, it's respective magnetic field interacts with the magnetic fields of the electrons in the atoms and molecules of the gun itself, the medium the projectile is traveling through (ie: air), and/or from around the slits themselves. 5. Via QED (quantum electrodynamics), newly generated photons might occur. 6. The projectile goes on it's own way and the newly generated photons go on their own way. It gives the illusion of a wave particle duality, but it is not that way in actual reality. 7. Specifically in the case of protons or electrons, the newly generated EM wave travels faster than the particles. The new EM waves go through both slits and sets up "hills and valleys" of field energy. When the proton or electron goes through one of the slits, it then follows whatever "valley" it enters thereby over time, even shooting only one proton or one electron at a time, the interference pattern will still emerge. 8. As far as detectors are concerned, they probably have an energy field that is one way when on and a different way when off. The interaction of this energy field (or the lack thereof) with whatever is passing through it, gives the indication that is observed. Now, for those who hold fast to reality being probability waves that are condensed down by an observer into one single physical reality, then: a. What exactly are these probability waves made up of? b. Where exactly are these probability waves stored at until they are observed? c. How exactly does an observer in physical reality actually observe these probability waves and condense them down into one single physical reality? d. Who and/or what observed the first observer? e. What exactly happens when two or more observers observe different probability waves? Which one takes precedent in physical reality? For me, while this observer condensing probability waves down into one single physical reality might work well on paper, it does not appear to reflect actual reality. Now, utilizing the scientific principal of Occam's razor, which way is more probably correct? My way by utilizing known scientific principals, or that is as discerned on paper as stated above is how reality actually is?

Boy, Was I Wrong! How the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser Really works Arvin Ash 917K subscribers

again

If not faster, as well, which is so odd

Oh come on, you call it observing but in reality, you are checking the light with an instrument that changes the energy of the photon, it has nothing to do with actual observation like watching it from a human perspective.

Yep, one of the seemingly impossible problems to solve. And it may well be impossible for us. @@Rudyard_Stripling

That’s what I thought at first

A wave is definitely a thing. In fact there is nothing that isn't energy i.e. waves.

@@alindegren6144 "thing" is probably too general since an emotion can be a "thing". But, my point is, as Alan Watts pointed out 50 years ago, a wave is a "waving" of something, not really a static object with properties like resting mass

Because it's a supercut. You might very well have watched parts of it before.

That is very well settled science, observing makes the photon interact with the outside world which collapses the probability wave function. It is not the observation itself, it is the interaction that causes the photon to take a definite path.

It sure is. While there may be useful mathematical equations regarding the phenomenon that seem to have predictive value they're not descriptive to the layman. What's the difference between observation and interaction?

@@d4vidd but how is it aware it's been interacted with?

It doesn't "know", it's reacting to other photons hitting hit when you observe it. When you're looking at something, it requires photons being sent and received. If nothing is being sent, you don't "see" it. But if you do see it, the photons are interacting with each other.

@@GabeHiggins the how would a single photon be acted upon by itself.

Maybe

This is what quantum computers are trying to use in real life too!

Just to add to the confusion, might I enquire if light can have wave-like properties then it must have a medium in which to travel. What is the medium in which light is propagating. The luminiferous ether was disproved in the Michelson-Morley experiment, as being the medium. Furthermore, in the double-slit experiment how does each photon know where to land on the screen. Also some photons arrive at what should be the darkest part of the fringe pattern according to interference effects. Questions, questions! Pomme