Guided tour through the world's largest turboprop - the Antonov An-22
Переглядів 39,836
День томуJoin me in this detailed tour of an Antonov An22 heavy transport aircraft on display at the Technik Museum in Speyer, Germany. This includes the exterior, the cargo section and the crew/passenger compartment.
Other videos from same museum(s):
Tupolev Tu144: • Guided tour through a ...
Buran-class orbiter: • Guided tour around the...
Other similar videos:
Avro Vulcan + engine run: • Guided tour through an...
de Havilland Comet 4 tour: • Guided tour through th...
Vickers VC-10: • Guided tour of a Vicke...
BAC TSR-2: • BAC TSR-2 Guided tour ...
Airbus A300: coming soon
JFK's Air Force One SAM 26000 VC-137C: • Detailed tour through ...
Lockheed VC-121E “Columbine III”: • Tour through Eisenhowe...
Douglas VC-54C “Sacred Cow” : • Video
The first Boeing 737 tour: • Detailed tour around t...
The first Boeing 727 tour: • Detailed tour around t...
Tour around the first Boeing 747 in Seattle: • Detailed tour through ...
Lockheed YF-12A tour: • Video
Tour around a Saturn V rocket in Houston: • Detailed tour around t...
Tour around the Northrop YF-23 in Dayton: • Tour around the Northr...
Detailed tour around the Lockheed F-22 Raptor: • Lockheed F-22 Raptor d...
F-117 Nighthawk: • Tour around the Lockhe...
NASA Shuttle Carrier Aircraft 747-100: • Detailed tour through ...
Space Shuttle Orbiter: • Detailed tour through ...
Hughes H-4 Hercules "Spruce Goose": • Detailed tour through ...
Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress: • Detailed tour through ...
Boeing B-29 Superfortress: • Detailed tour through ...
Convair B-36 Peacemaker: • Tour around the TEN en...
Boeing B-47 Stratojet: • Tour around a Boeing B...
Convair B-58 Hustler: • Tour around the first ...
North American XB-70 Valkryie: • Tour around the North ...
North American X-15: • Video
BAC Concorde: • Detailed tour of a Bri...
Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird: • Detailed tour through ...
Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit: • Detailed tour around a...
Grumman F-14 Tomcat: • Tour around the Grumma...
Tour around a Titan II missile silo on Tucson: • Detailed tour through ...
Tour through an AVRO Lancaster bomber: • Detailed tour through ...
Tour through a QANTAS Boeing 747-200B: • Detailed tour through ...
Tour through a QANTAS Boeing 707-138: • Tour through the uniqu...
Tour through a QANTAS Lockheed Super Constellation: • Tour through a Lockhee...
Tour through a Douglas DC-3: • Detailed tour through ...
Tour through a USAF Boeing B-52: • Detailed tour through ...
USAF/RAAF General Dynamics F-111: • Full tour through a Ge...
RAAF CAC Avon Sabre: • Tour around Australia'...
RAAC CAC Dassault Mirage III: • Tour around the Dassau...
100 years of QANTAS aircraft on display at the Qantas Founders Museum: • Guided tour of the Qan...
Tour through the first ever Boeing 747 in Seattle: • Video
Tour through Concorde: • Video
Tour through a VC-137B - Air Force One: • Tour through a Boeing ...
Onboard the LAST EVER Qantas Boeing 747 flight in Canberra: • Onboard the LAST EVER ...
Tour through a DeHavilland Comet 4 at the Duxford IMW: • Video
Tour through the Museum of Flight in Seattle: • Video
I have two UKposts channels: Paul Stewart (aviation travel vlogs): / paulstewartaviation
Paul Stewart EXTRA (unedited inflight aviation footage): / @paulstewart2ndchannel
Check out my Instagram account: @paulstewartaviation ( / paulstewartaviation ) and Facebook: /
If you enjoy this videos and want to see more, you can send me a donation via Paypal :) paypal.me/paulstewartaviation
#airplane #plane #plane
0:00 intro
0:40 history and nose
1:30 Auxiliary power units
1:52 fairing design and unique landing gear
2:58 Kuznetsov NK-12MA turboprop engines with four-bladed contra-rotating propellers
4:25 wing design
4:50 tail end with dual fins and cargo doors
7:00 entering cargo bay
8:38 internal electric hoists
09:02 navigators station
9:30 upstairs crew area and cockpit
11:25 nuclear powered An-22
12:32 Tu-144 and Buran orbiter
@bkdexter79 11 місяців тому
I appreciate your videos very much! No loud background music, just honestly good fact filled narration. Thank you Paul!
@PaulStewartAviation 11 місяців тому
Glad you enjoyed them Bruce. I try and keep them on point and avoid faffing about
@crashburn3292 11 місяців тому
I learn something every time I watch. I didn't know the Antonov An-22 had the same turboprop engine as the TU 95 Bear.
@kevinbarry71 11 місяців тому
The Greek mythological character that the Russians named this plane after is all powerful provided he stays in contact with the ground. Which strikes me as an absolutely insane name for an airplane
@zorilaz 11 місяців тому
This planes were built by ANOTOV which was founded by Oleg ANOTOV. That was his name. Nothing to do with your Greek character . People making up shit lol
@dallesamllhals9161 11 місяців тому
@@zorilaz Antaeus!
@kevinbarry71 11 місяців тому
@@zorilaz you are an idiot
@dr.jillalicecooper2587 11 місяців тому
@@zorilaz Antonov not Anotov😂
@watsisbuttndo829 11 місяців тому
No worse than the brits naming their carrier bourne aircraft the "gannet". A bird that dives head first into the sea!
@boeing747iscool 10 місяців тому
i didn't know this plane was even made but now i know thank you
@jasongarufi8187 11 місяців тому
Another great tour, the Antonov An-22 is certainly a huge aircraft
@Calebs_Aviation 11 місяців тому
Great video Paul! The Technik Museum is definitely on my list to visit hopefully this winter when I head to Germany! Also this aircraft the AN 22 reminds me a lot of the Soviet built Tupolev TU-114 airliner and TU-116 VIP transport turboprop aircraft which were based off the TU-95 bomber and built to compete with the American built airliners and VIP transport planes like the Lockheed L-1049G Super Constellation and its military counterpart. 😊Soviet Leader Nikita Khrushchev has the TU-114/6 built! 😮
@792slayer 11 місяців тому
Definitely a cool museum. Looks like you can walk through a lot of the displays.
@Calebs_Aviation 11 місяців тому
@@792slayer Hope to walk through the LH B747-200 there! 😊
@792slayer 11 місяців тому
@@Calebs_Aviation that would be pretty cool.
@Calebs_Aviation 11 місяців тому
@@792slayer I hopefully will visit this winter and keep an eye out for a video about if I do on my UKposts channel Caleb’s Aviation! Thx!
@Calebs_Aviation 11 місяців тому
@@792slayer I hopefully will visit this winter and keep an eye out for a video about if I do on my UKposts channel Caleb’s Aviation! Thx!
@keithammleter3824 11 місяців тому
Paul, at 5:20 you said that having 2 small fin/rudder arrangements instead on one large one reduces torque (stress) on the airframe. That doesn't make much sense. To achieve a given level of yaw stability you need a certain total fin area. To achieve a specified amount of directional control you need a certain total rudder area. With these predetermined areas, the torque imparted on the airframe is the same, regardless of whether it is one big fin+rudder, or 2 or more smaller ones adding up to the same total area. There is, however, a very minor, almost insignificant, structural advantage in the fin(s) themselves. You don't want them bending, nor oscillating in the wind like a violin string. To achieve the required fin stiffness, the amount of metal needed in the internal framing/bracing in 2 small fins is less than that needed in one large fin, due to lower internal leverage. This may have been what your source was referring too - torque within the fins, not torque imparted to the airframe.
@ronjon7942 11 місяців тому
That’s interesting, I never gave it much thought either way.
@PaulStewartAviation 11 місяців тому
Thanks for the extra information Keit and what you say makes perfect sense too.
@fattywithafirearm 11 місяців тому
Thats insane how big it is.
@brentsummers7377 11 місяців тому
Very nice review! The navigator had a very spacious work station.😀
@whatever8282828 11 місяців тому
It is fascinating how contra-rotating props were prized in USSR and dismissed by western militaries in the same era. As you discuss, they have some obvious advantages (no torque/yaw) but some similarly obvious disadvantages (very complicated gearing and maintenance). It is interesting to see USA finally musing about them for future helicopters all these decades later.
@keithammleter3824 11 місяців тому
Contra-rotating props were used in many aircraft of both Britain and the USA as piston engine power output rose during wartime development in WW2. The classic example is the Spitfire fighter - it started out with a 770 kW engine and three propellor blades, and ended up with a 1700 kW engine and 6 blades in a contra-rotation configuration. The US Mustang fighter had the same engine and contra prop arrangement. Quite a few American aircraft large and small had contra-rotation props. But post war, both countries concentrated on jet engines. It is not the case that the US military didn't like contra-rotation props. It was that they wanted jets, because jets are simpler and more reliable. In the early 1950's the thinking in both the US and Britain was that flying at very high altitude was required, in order to make it hard for enemies to shoot them down with ack-ack. At high altitude, props loose their fuel economy advantage. The poor serviceability and high failure rate of the B-36 large post-war propellor bomber made the USAAF concentrate on simplicity and reliability and go for jets. In the USSR, their post war planning concentrated on turboprops as they had much better fuel economy than the early jets. But to handle the large power output of the turbine engines, you need more propellor blade area. So you need more blades - hence contrarotation. The USSR planners expected their turboprop airliner to sell well in export markets - unfortunately for them the travelling public preferred jets.
@whatever8282828 11 місяців тому
@@keithammleter3824 i must insist that is not true
@paulsengupta971 11 місяців тому
Both the Shackleton and Fairey Gannet used contra-rotating props.
@xmanhoe 11 місяців тому
😯 Ohh I've just peed my shorts 😬🤣 Cheers for this one Paul 😉 I have a soft spot for these bad boys
@dvmurkus 11 місяців тому
Though I have already read about this plane before, today I have learned more, especially about propellers and the crew cabin. Thank you!
@gordongott127 11 місяців тому
Absolutely a beast what a amazing aircraft still. Thank you for your videos .. I enjoy all of them..
@flyonbyya 11 місяців тому
Remarkable Aircraft… Remarkable vid Presentation !!
@applejacks971 11 місяців тому
Awesome video and information, thanks for sharing with us! Getting to watch a new Paul Stewart video is the perfect beginning to any weekend :)
@markwng 11 місяців тому
Quite a display. Soviet era development was surely diverse.
@DropBear69 11 місяців тому
Thank you Paul. Awesome video once again. I learn something new from every one of your vids. Looking forward to your next drop. Cheers.
@koh_ling 11 місяців тому
Great tour Paul! Really interesting.
@arronjones6985 11 місяців тому
Absolutely loved this 👍
@peterandkyleemingham3923 11 місяців тому
Always love your videos Paul
@nathensieben 11 місяців тому
Awesome tour mate, always been amazed by these big buggers, would love to see one up close.
@rob737700 11 місяців тому
Another great video, thank you.
@eefregelneef2956 11 місяців тому
Thanks Paul. Nice vid.😊
@petr-podrouzek 11 місяців тому
Fantastic job as always, Paul 🙂
@PaulStewartAviation 11 місяців тому
Thanks Petr
@sergei6572 11 місяців тому
Отличный обзор! Спасибо, Пауль!
@heathertruskinger6214 11 місяців тому
I love your comment " unique interpretation of the owners manual ! 😂 LoL A real " muscle man " of the skies Thanks Paul 😊
@cupidstunt22 11 місяців тому
Fantastic stuff!
@richierich2534 8 місяців тому
Another great video
@PaulStewartAviation 8 місяців тому
Glad you enjoyed it
@marknagle1912 11 місяців тому
Nice to see you in the antonov in sinsheim had fun whilst climbing in it
@HAL-xy3om 11 місяців тому
Good show thanks
@Bad_Karma1968 11 місяців тому
Playing catch up informative Paul
@PaulStewartAviation 11 місяців тому
haha thanks Ted. Yes I've been releasing quite a few videos over the last few months :)
@jirihamersky6152 11 місяців тому
Nice and interesting video. Thanks.
@katimboallan4605 11 місяців тому
Very nice video
@leofriedwald9901 11 місяців тому
Dihedral increases stability, Anhedral reduces it. That bit of Anhedral you mention @5:40 probably goes away during flight when the wing is generating lift and flexes up.
@PaulStewartAviation 11 місяців тому
I'm happy to stand corrected but my understanding was that anhedral increases stability in side-wind conditions. I recall watching a video where Kelly Johnson explained the wing on the SR-71
@RodCurrin 11 місяців тому
I didn't get an idea of just how big it is until around 4:50 when my brain was confused by the chopper that looked too small to be between the AN-22 and the camera!
@Hughes500 11 місяців тому
I really liked that video. Soviet aircraft are so tough and agricultural. I mean that thing just looked so solid. Amazing that they could change the tyre pressures in flight. I imagine the navigator would be a very lonely job :(
@anjinsanx44 11 місяців тому
Well done the keep it up
@tsegulin 11 місяців тому
Great video, thanks! Always liked this aircraft but never seen inside it. Soviet or not, Antonov created some exceptional large cargo aircraft.
@SaturnCanuck 11 місяців тому
Wait! A giant Russian transport aircraft? That never happens. Man, did they ever built some big aircraft then, including the world’s largest helicopter. This thing is big! I have been fortunate enough to see and tour an Antonov An-124 and that is massive! Next to her was a C-5, and it was interesting to see the analog gauges of the An-124 opposing the digital C-5’s! Nice Paul. Oh and did I see a Guppy at the beginning? Dude I HAVE to see that!
@PaulStewartAviation 11 місяців тому
Yep Gubby was at Toulouse and a video coming for that soon…
@SaturnCanuck 11 місяців тому
@@PaulStewartAviation Always loved the guppy.
@ronjon7942 11 місяців тому
Russian cargo aircraft look so….military. With a touch of Klingon. Meant as a compliment, btw. As with the Bear, the engines of the An-22 look so spindly next to the fuselage, throwing me off on the actual size of the airframe. Paul’s video did a nice job providing size context, and of course they’re ginormous, but like the C-5, B-52, 747, I’m still awestruck seeing large planes in person - I hope to see the An-22. Actually, I may have, but from a distance - I couldn’t see if the engines were turboprops, or turbofans and that it was an An-124. Anyway, they delivered the Milwaukee Art Museum’s Calatrava structural steel ‘wings’ or ‘sail’ from Europe (sorry, can’t remember the country; maybe Spain or France) to MKE Mitchell Field. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milwaukee_Art_Museum Aviation fans will admire the beauty of the architecture. With a few exceptions, I always thought the building was far better than the art. In fact, whenever I did go visit it, I never new what was ‘playing’ as I only went to admire the construction - especially after some insulting garbage by some student far left liberals…handicrafter hobbyists trying to make a statement about the establishment. Typical trash that had no business being in such a stunning piece of actual artwork. Oh my! Guess I had some pent up annoyance! Apologies! Paul, please carry on. 🫡
@damienwilloughby 11 місяців тому
COOL 😎
@matty99 11 місяців тому
Great videos Paul, I really enjoy your content. I’ve been trying to think who your smile reminds me of and I’ve worked it out. Wallace from Wallace and Gromit, please tell me you love cheese 🧀 😉
@user-tn1vc1xz5d 11 місяців тому
Large Soviet turboprops....not known for being quiet inside. Always liked the Tu-114 with its massive props but few on display and those are in countries not easy to access at the moment. To minimise "beating" sound effects, large prop aircraft can allow synchronising of engines against a reference engine, say no.1, fine controlling of rpm of the other 3 so they all match and thus reducing harmonics and noise on cruise.
@ronjon7942 11 місяців тому
That’s pretty cool, I wonder if that’s a common thing amongst all multi engined props. Ah, after re-reading your post, it appears so. I do remember flying with my boss in his Cessna 340, and the dissonance when they were out of sync was really annoying and it even felt my balance was off - I believe I’d have gotten nauseous, or at least very fatigued, if the entire flight was thusly. As powerful a light twin as the 340 is, there wasn’t anything used to synchronize the props - it was done by manually adjusting the prop pitch until the harmonics matched. After all, the 520 cubic inch, 310 hp piston engines were a tad smaller than the Antaeus’ four 15,000 shp (each! Eeks) NK-12s.
@Travelsbydreamer 11 місяців тому
Great overview! She’s a big girl for sure 😃
@SnappyWasHere 11 місяців тому
I hope you did a video on that helicopter as well!
@PaulStewartAviation 11 місяців тому
Afraid not. I ran out of time and the gopro was playing up. Putting everything up on those poles also makes it difficult to film.
@gglasser8375 11 місяців тому
Hi Paul, love your vids! I'm really curious about whatever it is in your shot during the intro at 19 secs. Seems to be a giant cockpit with no wings? Can you let me know what it is so I can look it up. If you have done a vid on it, I'd be very interested to watch! Thanks
@PaulStewartAviation 11 місяців тому
Super Guppy in Toulouse. A video is coming on that in coming months :)
@lolsomeyoutuber.1425 11 місяців тому
coincidence or not, the AN-22 is the largest turbo prop and the AN-225 is the largest plane
@salmonella6744 11 місяців тому
Was*
@lolsomeyoutuber.1425 11 місяців тому
@@salmonella6744 ):
@workaholica 11 місяців тому
And the AN-2 is the largest single engine biplane. There is a pattern emerging ;)
@lolsomeyoutuber.1425 11 місяців тому
@@workaholica hmm
@simkahop8519 11 місяців тому
Crushed yet, unforunately, SO there is 2-nd scelet, never Ever been finished, but may BE will be rebuild 2-nd time, anyway China bought all the plans, So we will SEE, but AN 225 destroyed/does NOT exist any more - sorry. :(
@douglasaerowing 11 місяців тому
hello paul why the il 96 , b747-8i, b717 , md 90 , md 11 , a340-200/300/500 was not in the museum
@edward9 11 місяців тому
Hi Paul. Great videos! Is your accent Kiwi?
@PaulStewartAviation 11 місяців тому
Aussie
@edward9 11 місяців тому
@@PaulStewartAviation thanks 👍🏼
@davidbarnsley8486 11 місяців тому
I was in a Russian plane many years ago and don’t you just love the colour scheme Green and blue All there planes are the same I would to know why the dashboards are green when we paint everything black Good one Paul 👍👍
@PaulStewartAviation 11 місяців тому
Thanks David. I mention the cockpit green in my Tu-144 video :)
@user-vu6zx2pu1g 7 місяців тому
Это первый Ан 22 построенный в Ташкенте
@userhessenone1469 Місяць тому
That's 01-03, it's a prototype, yes, but not the first one which was 01-01.
@willmo1725 11 місяців тому
Cool look inside and out. Have you done a episode on the A400 it was at the airshow in chesterfield , missouri but no tours inside. I guess boeing couldnt stand the competition..
@PaulStewartAviation 11 місяців тому
I haven't been inside an a400 I'm afraid.
@willmo1725 11 місяців тому
@@PaulStewartAviation i bring it up, because i think it is the largest nato turbo prop. Also damn good looking airbus product. Love your u tube show., keep it coming.
@ronjon7942 11 місяців тому
@@willmo1725 wow, I just wrote the Atlas off as Europe’s Hercules, never realizing how much larger than the C-130 it was!
@FSXNOOB 11 місяців тому
Way bigger then i was used to in flight sim.. 😶
@divox9pqr 11 місяців тому
Was there a jet engine version of this plane?
@PaulStewartAviation 11 місяців тому
No
@judefernandez827 Місяць тому
Is this a real size model because the wings snd engines look small
@PaulStewartAviation Місяць тому
Nope, it’s just a really big plane :)
@userhessenone1469 Місяць тому
That's serial number 01-03, so that's one of the prototypes
@jherbski 11 місяців тому
8:00 😂
@malcolm824 11 місяців тому
I think you mean the Tu-114 was the fastest turboprop airliner ever, not the 144
@PaulStewartAviation 11 місяців тому
Yep my mistake
@judefernandez827 Місяць тому
Has the AN 22 ever visited Australia?
@PaulStewartAviation Місяць тому
Good question. I've seen an An-12 in Perth before, and the 124 up in Darwin.
@judefernandez827 Місяць тому
@@PaulStewartAviation I've seen a lot of An 32s and IL 76 when I lived in India near an Air Force Station
@marcel-rudimantaj4773 11 місяців тому
i know the owner of this and its sister museum in sinsheim
@userhessenone1469 9 місяців тому
there is no owner. its owned by an Association
@Noah_The_Magician 11 місяців тому
Early ❤🎉
@tarnejehovahson2148 11 місяців тому
Why is it with Russian aircraft they need 6 people in the cockpit I mean at most a captain first officer & engineer What was was the need for 6 pilots plus a navigator??
@PaulStewartAviation 11 місяців тому
Someone has to pour the booze?
@anjaliraychoudhury7253 11 місяців тому
AY GORU EYAT KI HOKISO ,MAY KIR USOROT JA
@gate7clamp 11 місяців тому
It wouldn’t be Russian aerospace technology if it didn’t have titanium in it
@charlestaylor253 11 місяців тому
Soviet Air Force officer: "Comrade pilots, the AN-22 with nuclear reactor aboard will let it fly more than 27,500 kilometers!" Soviet pilot: "Comrade officer, what if nuclear reactor starts leaking in flight?"... "Then comrades, you fly into NATO country and you all become Heroes Of Soviet Motherland!...😏
@paulsengupta971 11 місяців тому
It was more, "We throw it out of the aeroplane and it becomes someone else's problem."
@r3ndszergazda 11 місяців тому
I believe it’s pronounced “A.N. - 22” and not “AN-22”
@PaulStewartAviation 11 місяців тому
Fair enough, Ive seen it pronounced differently in various sources :)
@didgerihorn 11 місяців тому
3:50 Didn't know the supersonic TU-144 was a turboprop 😎
@badgerello 11 місяців тому
We know he meant the tu-114.
@PaulStewartAviation 11 місяців тому
Ops 😂😂
@nikerailfanningttm9046 11 місяців тому
My son was adopted from Russia and I’m proud of his heritage. It’s a shame today that the president had to be such a dick and start a fucking war.
@KNMK259 11 місяців тому
First...........
@TransportCats 11 місяців тому
Bit late my friend
@sanek7015 11 місяців тому
👍👍👍
@TransportCats 11 місяців тому
First!
@lsdzheeusi 11 місяців тому
No toilet? Lol
@userhessenone1469 9 місяців тому
Im pretty sure the serial models have one. But this testbed (01-03, third one built) hasn’t 😊
@lejviator 7 місяців тому
Will we ever see the sole active civil one again... after being damaged in the war ...😭😭😭😭😭
@johno9507 11 місяців тому
Ukraine may be the poorest country in Europe but they have some of the best aero engineers around. Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦 🇦🇺
@zorilaz 11 місяців тому
Lol not even that. This company was founded in Russia .
@johno9507 11 місяців тому
@@zorilaz Hasn't been in Russia since 1952. Now the only thing worthwhile to come out of Novosibirsk is Garage54.
@zorilaz 11 місяців тому
@@johno9507 USSR company not Ukrainian
@johno9507 11 місяців тому
@@zorilaz Well considering Antonov moved to Ukraine in 1952 and the USSR has been dead since 1991, and it's owned by the Ukraine government...I'd say that makes it a Ukrainian company
@zorilaz 11 місяців тому
@@johno9507 neah . Ukraine uses what USSR left . No wonder they are the poorest country in Europe
@ItsKing32 28 днів тому
The nato reporting name is what now 🤨🤨
@petethebastard 11 місяців тому
If it's Soviet Air... it's wow/Great! Gret vids as always Paul Stewart! How is the band going?! Painters and Dockers....
@robertcoleman4861 11 місяців тому
👍👍👍👍👍🍺
Paul Stewart
Переглядів 578 тис.
Суспільне Вінниця
Переглядів 428 тис.
FLIP FLOP Hacks
Переглядів 21 млн
Paul Stewart
Переглядів 172 тис.
Paul Stewart
Переглядів 771 тис.
Pilot Blog
Переглядів 160 тис.
НедоNews
Переглядів 26 тис.