Horsepower vs Torque - A Simple Explanation

  Переглядів 8,148,478

Engineering Explained

Engineering Explained

6 років тому

What's The Difference Between Horsepower & Torque?
Why Is Peak Acceleration At Peak Power? • Are CVTs The Best (Fas...
Subscribe for new videos every Wednesday! - goo.gl/VZstk7
Awesome Car Products: www.amazon.com/shop/engineeri...
Which is better, horsepower or torque? Two words that are often stated in the car community, but often misunderstood. This video seeks to clarify the difference between the two, without silly analogies like "horsepower is how fast you hit the wall, torque is how far you take it with you" (which, by the way, is highly inaccurate).
Torque is a force acting at a radius, while horsepower simply incorporates time into the equation. This video will discuss the differences, how each applies to internal combustion engines, how they relate, what peak torque and peak horsepower actually mean, and how to analyze torque and horsepower curves. Finally, what's more important for acceleration, a car with lots of power, or lots of torque?
Let's get technical. With the context of an engine: Power = Torque x Angular Velocity. In imperial units, this translates to Horsepower = Torque x RPM / 5252.
Engineering Explained is a participant in the Amazon Influencer Program.
Don't forget to check out my other pages below!
Facebook: / engineeringexplained
Official Website: www.howdoesacarwork.com
Twitter: / jasonfenske13
Instagram: / engineeringexplained
Car Throttle: www.carthrottle.com/user/engi...
Amazon: www.amazon.com/shop/engineeri...
EE Extra: / @engineeringexplainede...
NEW VIDEO EVERY WEDNESDAY!

КОМЕНТАРІ: 8 200
@Zed-not-Zee
@Zed-not-Zee 3 роки тому
Now I understand how my wife feels when I explain something to her about cars...
@SudarshanAshiya
@SudarshanAshiya 2 роки тому
don't waste your time in explanation 😂
@tamanako2507
@tamanako2507 2 роки тому
Some good music and thats about it, take her to a nice weekend honeymoon, that's all the explanation needed 😄👍
@AlyxAesthetics
@AlyxAesthetics 2 роки тому
@@SudarshanAshiya why not lol
@66522780
@66522780 2 роки тому
😂😂😂
@JH-nv2ue
@JH-nv2ue Рік тому
Or ANYTHING.
@luvjoychoker7807
@luvjoychoker7807 3 роки тому
Thanks, I almost understood.
@blahdelablah
@blahdelablah 3 роки тому
Consider you have a wheel that you're moving by hand. How much energy does it take to move the wheel around one revolution (i.e. all the way around once, back to the starting position)? That's what torque describes. Now consider if you want the wheel to turn as fast as it can. You now have to put in extra energy, so that the wheel turns multiple times as fast as it can. That's what horsepower describes. Both torque and horsepower are describing energy, but with torque it doesn't matter how long it takes for the energy to be applied, and with horsepower it does matter.
@ClokworkGremlin
@ClokworkGremlin 3 роки тому
Torque = force times distance. If you have a longer lever, you can apply more force to the other end of it. Horsepower = force times distance *over time.* The faster you want to do the work (like rotating the lever 1/4 turn), the less time you'll have to do it in, and the more horsepower you'll need. Conversely, the more horsepower you have, the less time it'll take you to do the work, and the faster you can do it.
@lakofbrwn1204
@lakofbrwn1204 3 роки тому
Guys, i feel like he was joking
@blahdelablah
@blahdelablah 3 роки тому
@@lakofbrwn1204 What makes you think he was joking?
@animationsxplaned8835
@animationsxplaned8835 3 роки тому
Hey, I make science based 3D animations, and I'm planning to make an animation on this topic as I was also confused at times. If you would like to give me some pointers to what you would like in my animation, I would love to hear it!
@Jpgundarun
@Jpgundarun 3 роки тому
Perfectly Understood. Now can you repeat the part where you said all the stuff about the things.
@surendrabhakuni1639
@surendrabhakuni1639 2 роки тому
Good
@reizinhodojogo3956
@reizinhodojogo3956 Рік тому
repeat the video
@Jpgundarun
@Jpgundarun Рік тому
@@reizinhodojogo3956 Then I would have to repeat my comment. Rwoosh!
@Cardiakk
@Cardiakk 23 дні тому
😂
@JoeOvercoat
@JoeOvercoat Рік тому
I think it’s easier for cyclists to understand this because at some point you cannot press harder any faster, but you can drop a gear press just as hard much faster and make the vehicle go faster.
@gumpyn
@gumpyn 9 місяців тому
wow seems like I understand it now. thank you
@Makarov023
@Makarov023 7 місяців тому
drop a gear and disappear
@scar8656
@scar8656 6 місяців тому
this actually made it simple thank you
@nickharrison3748
@nickharrison3748 5 місяців тому
also, if the diameter of wheels is more, you have to paddle less to reach the destination
@tannogo9538
@tannogo9538 4 місяці тому
All very good explained, thank you, only one remark power is not torque x rpm, correct is force x rpm. But ultimately it’s same if leverage is same. In our case the difference of force between force created and force needed at the shaft is multiplied by rpm giving the reserve power that our car has at a certain point
@positivevibes5114
@positivevibes5114 3 роки тому
This Guy : Explains everything perfectly My mind = ok we need a longer car for more power 😆
@Hans_ON_FIRE
@Hans_ON_FIRE 3 роки тому
Lmao yes, yes.... of course, the limousine. It's all coming together now
@Samsu7777777
@Samsu7777777 3 роки тому
Hilarious 🤣
@Ironwind1972
@Ironwind1972 3 роки тому
haha longer connecting rod
@itactics1
@itactics1 3 роки тому
That's why drag cars are the shape they are.
@Dave-yk8ik
@Dave-yk8ik 3 роки тому
Actually bust oot "lol"ing always read the comments
@technologu
@technologu 6 років тому
there's no school like youtube
@jimgiordano3613
@jimgiordano3613 6 років тому
aint that the truth.
@rickvelocity5578
@rickvelocity5578 6 років тому
Should you believe everything you see on u-tube?
@triedproven9908
@triedproven9908 6 років тому
Until he starts talking about carnot cycles stay in school.
@technologu
@technologu 6 років тому
true I would ban half of youtubers. not demonetize . ban
@davidvasquez3564
@davidvasquez3564 6 років тому
Rick Velocity I call it the learning channel, with it I'm able too work on my own vehicle among other things around the house.
@KuyaKimAtienza
@KuyaKimAtienza 3 роки тому
I understood the introduction. you lost me at 99 percent of the video.
@animationsxplaned8835
@animationsxplaned8835 3 роки тому
Hey, I make science based 3D animations, and I'm planning to make an animation on this topic as I was also confused at times. If you would like to give me some pointers to what you would like in my animation, I would love to hear it!
@WHYNKO
@WHYNKO 3 роки тому
You just need to know the sentence/proverb/formula/the jist of this video at 6:48😉
@chaztitan6457
@chaztitan6457 2 роки тому
then dont vote
@drienkm
@drienkm 2 роки тому
I think anyone who understands torque and is seriously trying to understand the relevance of power should just focus on understanding Mechanical Advantage (gear ratios and wheel diameters). When you really understand what gear ratios and wheel diameters do, suddenly it will all click - why power is so meaningful. For a vehicle, power is just the amount of forward push for the speed it is currently moving. In slightly more technical terms, power at any moment is forward thrust at that moment times forward speed at that moment. Algebraically rearranged: Forward thrust at any moment is equal to power at that moment divided by forward speed at that moment. And you should understand what units are;)
@chaztitan6457
@chaztitan6457 2 роки тому
@@drienkm power is just that. for all intent and purposes, gearing can be ignored if you know the output at any given time of a race. the higher the hp the motor is making at that moment, regardless of gearing. will tell you what or who will accelerate more. I agree with everything you said. and people that do get hung up on gearing and tq, havent really put it all together in their head yet. these are probably the same people that will say, hp sells car and tq wins races or hp is how fast you hit the wall, tq is how far you go through it. or some other nonsense.
@haydencarpenter1516
@haydencarpenter1516 2 роки тому
Rewatched some of your early videos after being a viewer of about two years and the progress of how you come across on camera is incredible. Practice makes perfect and you can tell that you’re far more comfortable on camera now than you once were. Long time fan, love the videos.
@EngineeringExplained
@EngineeringExplained 2 роки тому
Thanks for the kind words!
@surendrabhakuni1639
@surendrabhakuni1639 2 роки тому
Agreed
@danielmcarthur2776
@danielmcarthur2776 Рік тому
couldn't agree more
@dertmatyui
@dertmatyui Рік тому
It’s always fun to see people get comfortable on camera
@williammiller3704
@williammiller3704 Рік тому
Hate the video how to block would be helpful🖕
@martynm.449
@martynm.449 5 років тому
This is how it would be thought of in a physics lesson. It might help. Torque is a turning force. And you can use that force to turn, or revolve, something - like a screwdriver. And by applying torque, you can make that screwdriver turn a revolution. By doing so, you have completed 'work' (though a fairly small amount). Torque is measured in either Newton Metres, or Lbs Feet. In this explanation, we will just keep things simple - think of torque as brute strength. Horse Power is a method of measuring how much work is done in a given time. You need to know how much torque is applied, multiplied by how many revolutions per minute that torque is applied, to work out how much horsepower is achieved. This is the way I think of it... There are two piles of bricks, one hundred in each pile, and they need moving across a building site. A muscle man and a marathon runner challenge each other to a race. To see who can move a pile of the bricks the fastest. The chap with a lot of muscle and strength (we will think of him as having the strength to apply lots of torque) is built like Ronnie Coleman. He is big and immensely strong but heavy and quite slow as a result. He is quite capable of scooping up a whole load of bricks and carrying them. He can carry 20 bricks at once, but he SLOOOOWLY.... walks with them. He could move all the bricks in 5 trips and take 10 minutes. The seriously fit runner, who is light and fast on his feet (think of Mo Farrah) might only carry 2 bricks - 1 in each hand - and sprints across the ground. He has a low amount of muscle (or torque) but his legs can run (a form of revolution for our example) at a really fast rate. It takes the runner 50 trips to move the bricks. Also in 10 minutes Now if they both complete the task in the same time, then they have both done equal amounts of WORK (which can be measured in Horsepower or Kilowatts) and It's a draw. However, if Ronnie Coleman could manage to carry 25 bricks per trip, at the same pace, he does it in 4 trips, and in just 8 mins. He will have put out more horsepower. He carries bricks at a slow pace compared to Mo, but by applying more strength (or torque), each rpm is doing more effort. Then it's just a case of multiplying the two together. Torque X RPMs. However, Mo Farrah - still only carrying 2 bricks - refuses to be beaten!!! He hasn't got the strength (or torque) to carry more than 2 bricks, but he can pick up the pace instead. So he runs faster and his legs are a blur!!! . He finishes the task faster than Ronnie, let's say 7 mins. His body, although weaker at lifting, has now worked harder, because his low amount of torque, could be multiplied by very high revs. Think of a motorbike screaming along at 16000 rpms.... Lots and lots and lots of small, easy efforts, all added up to one huge effort to beat Ronnie. And he has now worked the hardest Mo Farrah's incredibly hard work (measured in horsepower) meant he was moving more bricks in a given amount of time. Keep this example in mind and think of your car engine. Horsepower is simply a way of measuring work done in a given time. It is not a unit of force, or a measure of how fast it can travel. The ability of an engine to provide power is achieved either by applying large amounts of torque at low revs, or applying low amounts of torque at high revs. In real life Ronnie Coleman is built like a truck and would most likely win the competition in our example. He would be more efficient as he wouldn't be wasting time picking up and putting down bricks 50 times. Plus Mo Farrah would probably have to run at some ridiculous speed like 40 mph. It's just not feasible. You couldn't expect a motorcycle to carry bricks - it's not designed for it. The truck is. An articulated lorry tractor unit or semi - truck (if you're in America), might have 600 or 700 horsepower but that is only an indication of how much work it is capable of. If comparing two vehicles to see which is faster, then look at POWER TO WEIGHT ratio. Although so many other factors affect performance: air drag, rolling resistance, a final drive ratio affects acceleration, fwd,rwd, awd, tyre traction.... etc etc etc. Its never simple. When office workers talk of how much work they have done that day - scientifically that's not really the case. It does not take a lot of horsepower or Watts to pick up a few pens, or shuffle some paper. The man who's outside, lifting and carrying all day long, has worked much harder. Something my boss could never understand when I tried telling him that office work is not real work! (sorry office workers. I mean no offence; that's physics!)
@steves1015
@steves1015 5 років тому
Thank you for your explanation. I found it very useful and informative. :)
@forloop7713
@forloop7713 5 років тому
Had to stop reading when you said horsepower is equal to work
@martynm.449
@martynm.449 5 років тому
@@forloop7713 That's what James Watt developed the horsepower unit for. A unit of measuring work. Google it if you like.
@myself6296
@myself6296 5 років тому
Not a bad explanation, but I would have 'charmed' the bricks up the hill, Charming is a not so well known measurement of force. Like If you have a banger of a car and I have a shiny one with go faster stripes, I am better looking so I win.
@steves1015
@steves1015 5 років тому
Martin S why did you have to stop reading? Horsepower is defined as the rate at which work is done - which is what Martyn M. said. I prefer this definition to saying that it is just “power” simply because it is more explanatory.
@chrisl1398
@chrisl1398 6 років тому
Jason, you’ve just answered the question that I’ve had for years! I knew of torque, I knew of horsepower, but couldn’t determine how they intermingled on a power curve. Mind blown today when you pulled it all together
@KoudZ
@KoudZ 6 років тому
or... you could pay attention in a chool.
@threesixty4486
@threesixty4486 6 років тому
Could "have" "paid" attention "in" "school". Greetings from Holland..
@leobuchwieser1203
@leobuchwieser1203 6 років тому
Bagdadsky_Hornik haha nice. I hope you're just trolling
@KoudZ
@KoudZ 6 років тому
Paul Tuinman oh... sorry for my english. Here in Ukraine I learned english by myself, but those technical basics we were taught in a secondary school. It doesnt change the point tho...
@Ztingjammer
@Ztingjammer 6 років тому
Bagdadsky_Hornik *though
@Ironwind1972
@Ironwind1972 3 роки тому
Think of it like this: Torque is how much weight you can bench press, horsepower is how many reps you can perform with that weight in a certain time frame. EDIT: I tried to keep it simple by mentioning "time frame" because you have to have some way of measuring how fast the weight is being moved in the example I've given. Which is confusing some people on RPM's vs horsepower. Think of your RPM's as being your rep count. And your horsepower is how fast you can move the weight to that rep count. For example..if you have two bodybuilders that have the same torque but different horsepower, it's going to take the one with a higher horsepower less time to get to 10 reps than it will the bodybuilder with the lower horsepower. Even though they are both lifting the same amount of weight and doing the same amount of reps.
@dukechangwang8017
@dukechangwang8017 3 роки тому
So then with an engine, there is no muscle fatigue, so it's just your max a number of times within the time frame?
@Ironwind1972
@Ironwind1972 3 роки тому
​@@dukechangwang8017 Your question is an ironic conundrum funny enough. Horsepower is kind of like your muscle fatigue. It determines how fast your engine gets up to it's maximum torque and can maintain it's peak potential. If you have low horsepower and high torque, you'll stall out under a heavy load, because you don't have enough horsepower to get to peak torque and maintain it. Just like not having enough energy to do more reps, let alone more reps at a faster pace.
@dukechangwang8017
@dukechangwang8017 3 роки тому
@@Ironwind1972 so since torque is tied in and dependent on horsepower, there's no way you can have high horsepower and too low of torque right?
@Ironwind1972
@Ironwind1972 3 роки тому
​@@dukechangwang8017 As long as you have the torque to move the weight of the machine to begin with. But take motorcycles for example (inline engines), they have high Hp and lower Tq. That's why they accelerate quick and maintain speed so well, they reach their peak torque numbers faster and have the ample horsepower to maintain it. They just don't need the Tq due to their lightweight.
@dukechangwang8017
@dukechangwang8017 3 роки тому
@@Ironwind1972 you're a godsend I understand this a ton better now thanks 🙏
@ArnavMazumder9
@ArnavMazumder9 3 роки тому
I'm on a 32 inch monitor and at 4K it feels like you're sitting and explaining this right in front of me in person while I'm sitting on the opposite side of the table. Love the quality and explanation!
@Furantzu
@Furantzu 6 років тому
Man, I swear, between you and ChrisFix, I get a good dosage of car related knowledge, you two guys and a few out there are really professional when it comes to stuff like this, thanks for helping us out with these amazing vids🤘
@EngineeringExplained
@EngineeringExplained 6 років тому
Chris is wonderful, glad you enjoy the video!!
@seriousdopamine4404
@seriousdopamine4404 6 років тому
Couldn't agree more
@sergiobustamante4501
@sergiobustamante4501 6 років тому
Furantzu can you give me the link for Chris Chanel ? Thanks, and yes this guy is awesome when it comes to explaining anything.
@Furantzu
@Furantzu 6 років тому
Sergio Bustamante Sergio I'd rather not spam here, just search and look up here on YT for ChrisFix, a lot of stuff will come up, he's got very clean, well explained methods for doing a lot of stuff on cars if you're a do-it-yourself kind of guy, hence why I mentioned both channels, these guys are very methodic yet dynamic when it comes to explaining, never a dull/boring moment!
@matthesinator
@matthesinator 6 років тому
Yeah a video with him would be great, I think
@prabathPk
@prabathPk 6 років тому
There's no denying the fact that this is the most simplest explanation one can find regarding the difference between torque and horsepower. Spectacular work Jason!
@explosivegaming673
@explosivegaming673 6 років тому
horsepower is how fast you hit the wall, torque is how far you take the wall with you
@elanjacobs1
@elanjacobs1 6 років тому
Explosive Gaming I'm not sure where that analogy came from, I've heard it many times, but it's completely wrong.
@radicaledwards3449
@radicaledwards3449 6 років тому
Elan Jacobs not completely wrong
@radicaledwards3449
@radicaledwards3449 6 років тому
Explosive Gaming a Bugatti veyron has more power than any tractor but can't carry all them bricks like a tractor with only 10% the horsepower of a veyron.
@ThePieMan159
@ThePieMan159 6 років тому
Explosive Gaming it'd be better to say "torque is how much the car can do - horsepower is how fast it can do it"
@13baappangamatlo12
@13baappangamatlo12 3 роки тому
Advantage of UKposts - you need not feel embarassed for not getting it in the 1st go. Just double tap on the LHS
@4KUHDTrailers
@4KUHDTrailers 2 роки тому
I couldn’t have asked for a more informative yet succinct video with visual representation too. Instantly subscribed as you turn complex theories into fun examples that are easy to understand!! Thank you ☺️
@Bigbuddyandblue
@Bigbuddyandblue 3 роки тому
“Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world.” Archimedes
@edfilipowicz4866
@edfilipowicz4866 3 роки тому
I thought he said..."Give me a place on which to stand, and I shall move the Earth"
@DannyWohl
@DannyWohl 3 роки тому
Little did he know that his mind was the lever and his Self the fulcrum
@samuraijosh1595
@samuraijosh1595 3 роки тому
@@edfilipowicz4866 Nah, OP is right except the world part. Archimedes used earth and didn't use words like "lever or fulcrum"...
@GH-oi2jf
@GH-oi2jf 3 роки тому
He wouldn’t stand at the fulcrum. That’s the pivot point of the lever.
@GeorgeFafa
@GeorgeFafa 3 роки тому
What he said was: Δώστε μου ένα μέρος για να σταθώ και θα μετακινήσω ακόμα κι ολόκληρη τη Γη. Which translates to: Give me a place to stand and I will even move the whole Earth. No levers or fulcrums or worlds, just a place and the earth, and the whole thing of course relates to levers. :-)
@jakeells66
@jakeells66 4 роки тому
You lost me at "hello everyone and welcome"
@gswizardias1178
@gswizardias1178 4 роки тому
Bruh 🤣
@IlMaxDamagelI
@IlMaxDamagelI 3 роки тому
Lol 🤣
@faisalbashir1717
@faisalbashir1717 3 роки тому
My brain runs on horse power and my body moves because of torque that's simple and that's all I could understand if I try to put too much pressure to understand the difference between torque and horsepower my brain and body will loose their horsepower and torque. 🙂🤗😁👍
@yacineaber2934
@yacineaber2934 3 роки тому
Same🤣🤣
@multiversetraveller3118
@multiversetraveller3118 3 роки тому
I think this video will be easier to understand if you somewhat know how gears work. And knowing how engines work. Search some videos on the topic. It will definitely help.
@kitkatpadywak7609
@kitkatpadywak7609 Рік тому
This was the best explanation I've heard and I think I'm pretty confident in my understanding of the relationship between torque and horsepower now. Thank you so much
@hasski
@hasski 2 роки тому
I think the reason so many people struggle with this (myself included) is that it is ultimately NOT simple. Much as I enjoy EE's videos, it's possible that an engineer is not the best person to explain it ;-)
@Hank520Tube
@Hank520Tube Рік тому
agree, what is needed is a Physicist, but he/she would just say the same thing as in this video: Horsepower is just the rate that work is done HP=dW/dt, and Torque is T= F x R. Now do you understand?
@JohnSmith-ct5jd
@JohnSmith-ct5jd Рік тому
Exactly.
@pathania3377
@pathania3377 Рік тому
@@Hank520Tube I think layman's terms is necessary... How I have remembered it... HP... The basic power for level road...how much power the car has. Torque... Capability of the vehicle to move up an inclination... (Keep the tyres rotating even when it's a climb..)
@Solusspiritus
@Solusspiritus Рік тому
It's pretty simple he explains it fully not even half way through the video
@parker469a
@parker469a Рік тому
@@pathania3377 I've usually thought about it as HP is the speed a car can go while Torque is only really to effect how easy it is to burn out. Torque can help you get to top speed faster but isn't the deciding factor in how fast a car can go which is what HP helps to decide. However, there is a steep diminishing returns on it. 200hp = 150mph, 700hp = 200 mph, 1,600hp = 300 mph. So high torque is best for burn out competitions, drifting, and getting your car up to top speed quickly but doesn't help give you any meaningful data on what that top speed will be. I think...
@ClownTrader1
@ClownTrader1 5 років тому
Horsepower is how fast you can turn the wrench, torque is how hard you can turn the wrench.
@nainka11
@nainka11 5 років тому
Horesepower - is simply that- like Voltage it known as potential energy - or the capacity to do work - lets say you have a horse and then give it the capacity of 20 horses - what do you want to do with it ? Speed you along at breakneck speed or pull a plaugh ? Torque is actually called rotational force - so it IS force ( mass x acc ) just going round - think of it as a fireman uncoiling his hose across the ground. or a wheel of a particular sixe and weight rolling until it hits another object. Finally the greater the force the greater the capacity to do work, and that includes accelleratio - The formula for force says force is equal to mass (m) multiplied by acceleration (a). If you have any two of the three variables, you can solve for the third. Force is measured in Newtons (N), mass in kilograms (kg), and acceleration in meters per second squared ( m/s2 ).
@rotorav8
@rotorav8 5 років тому
Here’s how to consider electricity. Picture your wire as a garden hose. Current is the rate water can go from one end to the other. Voltage is the pressure of the water or force pushing the water. Wattage is the volume coming out the other end in a certain time. Need more water with less pressure? Get a bigger hose and the same pressure gets you more water filling your pool faster. Need lots of wattage/water through the same hose? Crank up the voltage\pressure. The result of either is more water. Byproduct of either is more chance of a blowout so operate within the limits of your hose/wiring.
@saytammm
@saytammm 5 років тому
crank up the voltage/pressure too much? your wire/hose gets destroyed. They indeed work the same way and to understand electricity i've always pictured it like this
@rotorav8
@rotorav8 5 років тому
saytammm yeah, literally the “flow of electrons through a conductor ” little particles actually flowing. People say to me you can’t see them, I say...can you see two hydrogen and one oxygen molecule? No but that doesn’t mean it isn’t there. With a big microscope you can
@stephenjoshuawayno5599
@stephenjoshuawayno5599 5 років тому
More like in a car horsepower is how much force you hit the crowd and torque how long can you drag the bodies? -not mine
@Winterstick549
@Winterstick549 5 років тому
Nothing causes more arguing and dissension than Politics, Harley Davidsons and the definition of torque.
@perrysouvana1137
@perrysouvana1137 5 років тому
what about time of fuel can burn
@pepsiman397
@pepsiman397 5 років тому
Harley Davidson gay
@nainka11
@nainka11 5 років тому
Torque is a rotational force - simples ! Think of a motorcycle on the wall of death going at 50mph - then put something in it's way - same as being hit at 50 mph on a flat road - I think were people get confused is the power and speed. Force is the potentional to do work - how you harness and use it varies - Atic vehicles have some of the greates power on the road..mmh... Formula 1 cars have 1.6L engines....which would you like to be hit by.......an F1 car doing 150mph or an artic doing 50mph - I remember my old days in scholl playing rugby - I was always told don't shy away from the inpact of a tackle the result will be worse - ie standing still.
@cb250nighthawk3
@cb250nighthawk3 5 років тому
How about women? I thought they cause more arguing and dissension when they manipulate things.
@jimgagne3801
@jimgagne3801 5 років тому
@@cb250nighthawk3 Ya, those are called wives.
@ronjon7942
@ronjon7942 Рік тому
The explanations using the peak values graphs were really good. Nice work, great perspective.
@SrTitusTheGreat
@SrTitusTheGreat 2 роки тому
This is so much better of an explanation than every other 30 minute filler video… thank you so much
@vtr0104
@vtr0104 6 років тому
Thumbs up for the explanation and LEGO Shell Limited Edition Ferrari F40 with pull-back action :P
@rYN3zvE43
@rYN3zvE43 6 років тому
Do the LEGO Shell Limited Edition Ferrari F40s have a time delay option? Was wondering how it sat there for a while first.
@ristau
@ristau 6 років тому
It has loads of torque..
@EngineeringExplained
@EngineeringExplained 6 років тому
Thanks for watching everyone! I think one question that may come up after watching this is "Why does maximum acceleration happen at peak horsepower, rather than peak torque?" It's a fair question, because in a single gear ratio, peak acceleration (the force pressing you back in your seat) occurs at peak torque. I have a video explaining this in great detail: ukposts.info/have/v-deo/m5Jnpn-RnXmmqX0.html Edit: Also, if you're confused about the equation for Horsepower in this video not including 5,252, I did this to simplify the video. 5,252 is a scaling factor only appropriate for imperial units, it is not useful if you use kW or N-m, so it's inappropriate to use 5,252 in a general equation. I will include a video in the future explaining exactly where (through derivation) 5,252 comes from.
@johnwilliammaxwell5044
@johnwilliammaxwell5044 6 років тому
Jason, if torque is the force multiplied by the gearing, why isn't the torque figure consistent across the rev range? Regardless of RPM, you are applying the same amount of force throughout a given gear.
@johnwilliammaxwell5044
@johnwilliammaxwell5044 6 років тому
So essentially, the force being applied is not actually consistent across the rev range due to the ignition timing, intake/exhaust pressure, valve timing, and such? Meaning that in theory, if an engine had the same volumetric efficiency across the rev range, then peak torque would be constant in a given gear?
@maximstarodub6703
@maximstarodub6703 6 років тому
Engineering Explained so for accelerating as fast as possible in a race, one should ideally shift gears at max RPM instead of the at the point where torque is highest? Is that done in practice?
@johnwilliammaxwell5044
@johnwilliammaxwell5044 6 років тому
That makes sense. I was thinking in terms of what gets sent to the wheels, but that's just based on the transmission. Torque at the flywheel would be the same regardless of the gear selected.
@EngineeringExplained
@EngineeringExplained 6 років тому
+M Yes, assuming the torque drop off at peak RPM is not super severe. And yes, this is done in racing (shift at max RPM).
@MichaelBrown-ds5ll
@MichaelBrown-ds5ll Рік тому
Great video. I have watched many and enjoy the topics and the way you explain it. Would have loved to have these back in the early 90's when I was part of our LeTourneau SAE club and teams doing design projects like the Mini Baja, Formula SAE, and the High Mileage competition.
@benhaze1010
@benhaze1010 Рік тому
I came back across this video; many automotive reviewers should watch it to under stand torque is not the end of all things when they are not completed off the track to start with. Great explanation!
@vikasgulia4104
@vikasgulia4104 6 років тому
Wow what a simple explanation.. you made this very simple . Icant compliment you more because im not so good in english Love from india
@EngineeringExplained
@EngineeringExplained 6 років тому
Happy to hear it, thanks for watching!
@vikasgulia4104
@vikasgulia4104 6 років тому
Engineering Explained thanks to you for the video
@colbyscott9822
@colbyscott9822 3 роки тому
I'm very mechanically inclined and have heard the HP v Torque explained in about 10 different ways. I still don't understand it outside of "torque is how much load can be hauled" and "HP is how fast you can haul it."
@ctbrahmstedt
@ctbrahmstedt 2 роки тому
It took me a minute too. I have an F350 6.0L diesel and a 3.6L Jeep Wrangler. Both rated at ~300hp. So why can’t my Jeep pull a 20,000lb trailer even though it’s the same power? Well, in theory, it could. My Jeep only makes 300hp at like 6500rpm and maybe 100 at 2000rpm. I would need a 15 speed gear box just to be able to get that trailer moving, and once it is moving, I would be red lining the engine and could not maintain that power. The diesel can provide 300hp at 2000 rpm, so I can get it moving pretty easily and not red line my engine doing so. What you quoted isn’t true technically, but it is practically. You can gear 300hp to put that power where you want it (optimized top speed or high load, pick one) but practically, you build your engine for it. A 15L semi engine is very high torque. Can probably make 300hp at 500rpm. It can drag 80,000lbs up a hill all day, and that 2000lb engine is a drop in the bucket for the rest of the truck. Now take a 700hp street McLaren. Most of the time it’s driving at road speeds and only needs 100hp. But when on the track and it wants 700hp, it can put it down in short bursts (at 8000rpm). That 4L engine would explode if you asked it to maintain full load, plus it would require a loooot of gears to have that power at a starting speed. And you would burn through clutches every 1000 miles. The penalty of a high torque engine. Is while that 6.0L engine can make that power at only 2000rpm, it redlines at 3500. It’s too large to be able to get the rpm improvement to get higher peak power. Ya, if you could spin that same engine at 7000rpm, that would produce hilarious power, but the bigger pistons and longer bore couldn’t handle it. Hope that makes it slightly more clear than mud.
@theingenesistproject
@theingenesistproject 2 роки тому
Get on a mountain bike, go through the gears, up and down some hills and figure it out for yourself.
@geemy9675
@geemy9675 2 роки тому
​@@ctbrahmstedt this video is not about reliability, overheating, displacement. its just about power, torque and acceleration. torque can be multiplied with gearing, horsepower can't, period. how many gears you need is not about having huge torque, it is about what is your lowest gear (so you can climb any hill at least in first and not get stuck, and start comfortably in first without frying your clutch ), highest gear (for highway cruisng) and how wide is your powerband so you can shift beetween gears without having a huge drop in power. l this is why even trucks with huge engines and enormous torque still have a lot of gears (10 to 18)
@fltchr4449
@fltchr4449 2 роки тому
@@ctbrahmstedt Do the high torque engines make their greatest power at peak RPM? For example, the engine you describe at the end. It makes a lot of power at 2000 RPM but does it make more power at its max 3500 RPM?
@fltchr4449
@fltchr4449 2 роки тому
@@geemy9675 And those large trucks are limited in maximum RPM so they need larger gears to reach higher speeds (and all the gears to get to those speeds).
@weathergenerator
@weathergenerator 2 роки тому
Brilliantly explained. Finally I can confidently say I could understand the basic fundamentals and connect why certain cars move faster inspite of having a lower capacity engine horse power.
@surendrabhakuni1639
@surendrabhakuni1639 2 роки тому
Great
@syntheovaldy5173
@syntheovaldy5173 3 місяці тому
why, then?
@Ja22i
@Ja22i Рік тому
I've wanted a good explanation for this for years. This is amazing, thank you.
@BhriguBharadwajPant
@BhriguBharadwajPant 6 років тому
Also explain why diesel have more torque than gasoline for same engine size... Greater compression ratio > longer connecting rod > larger crank radius = larger distance = more torque 😊
@rezah336
@rezah336 6 років тому
incorrect
@billyso8933
@billyso8933 6 років тому
Also, diesel contains more energy than gasoline
@antontaylor4530
@antontaylor4530 6 років тому
Diesel fuel also has more energy per litre of fuel than gasoline.
@BhriguBharadwajPant
@BhriguBharadwajPant 6 років тому
Billy So Calorific value of diesel is roughly 45.5 MJ/kg while that of Petrol is 45.8 MJ/kg
@remytv
@remytv 6 років тому
Diesel burns much slower than gasoline. It pushes down the piston over a longer period than petrol.
@jeremiahmcelroy2726
@jeremiahmcelroy2726 6 років тому
I like this video a lot more than your others. Don't get me wrong I love all your videos, but it's nice to understand an entire video. Even if I understand your math based videos I can't apply that knowledge in real life, this I can apply to grasp a better understanding of how my car is working when I'm driving my standard car. That will help a lot
@robman1286
@robman1286 6 років тому
Darth Strakh I totally agree I love these videos, it's clear this guy can blow our minds with knowledge. He should start a channel "Engineeringfordummies"
@mayaibuki
@mayaibuki 6 років тому
+1
@dinosenpaiful
@dinosenpaiful 6 років тому
Dart1 h Strakh
@kandalagagankumar1381
@kandalagagankumar1381 Рік тому
The best explanation I heard on HP vs Torque, been searching for video like this. I understood it perfectly. Thank You EE
@rubenchoychoo8551
@rubenchoychoo8551 3 роки тому
Getting clearer each time I watch this. Thanks
@amsingh3041
@amsingh3041 4 роки тому
I was following you up until it all got complicated 😂😂😂
@ares6949
@ares6949 3 роки тому
HOLD UP. So what comes first, torque or horsepower? How does one create the other or are they separate? This video helped me understand much better than the donut media one!!!!!!!!!!
@alterego9791
@alterego9791 3 роки тому
@@ares6949 weird name. Firstly, we need to understand that torque is force multiplied by distance. Torque in an engine is how much force the pistons can exert so that the wheels can spin. The longer the distance between pistons and crankshaft, the more torque so that the wheels can spin. Horsepower is the times the piston revolves (like 500 Rounds per Minute etc.) and is determined by torque times RPM (power = work done/time) and so more the torque and RPM more the Horsepower. Overall you need more torque to get more horsepower so that a car accelerates faster and is more Eco-Friendly.
@faisalbashir1717
@faisalbashir1717 3 роки тому
@@alterego9791 very good now I understood the whole phenomenon thanks
@kenca0
@kenca0 3 роки тому
torque is how strong that piston push, horse power is torque multiply how fast it can rev. A big engine has stronger torque and can pull better than small engine at the same rpm. A small engine can get more horse powers by revving at higher rpm, but it can not exceed its torque limit for its size (unless turbo). The S2000 engines can rev really high and make 240 horses, but has only 150 torque, even as it revs higher, it will only make more horse power, the torque is still the same.
@ares6949
@ares6949 3 роки тому
@@kenca0 Thanks for saying it i english dude :D i understand now! Thanks!!!
@cashblack3396
@cashblack3396 6 років тому
Videos like these are why I'm subscribed. Keep it up man.
@sanjuuppal
@sanjuuppal 2 місяці тому
You explained it so simply .. your explanation style was superlative !!
@HiTechDiver
@HiTechDiver Рік тому
Probably the clearest explanation I've heard thus far. Got ya the first time around, though I am mechanically inclined as well. I prefer torque, because I like the usable power at a lower RPM.
@catfishcave379
@catfishcave379 5 років тому
The confusion comes from the inclusion of gears in the simplified equation. Look at tractors and their high torque and low hp engines. Look at why hot-rodders turbocharge their cars. Early HP doesn't necessarily translate into quicker acceleration, but early and consistent torque does. Work performed is such a simple statement. Using your long handled wrench as an example - you get more torque with it. Make one revolution every minute. Now every 30 seconds. Now every 10 seconds. Getting tired? Now every 1 second - generating the same torque but doing more work - hence higher horsepower. Now if you add gears, you can magnify your torque and your horsepower as you see fit, carefully trying to find the right balance with your human engine. If you add a 10 foot extension to your wrench, you'll get super high torque, but very little horsepower as its a lot of work to go one revolution. If you shorten it, it will be harder to get up to speed, but you can spin it much faster. This is why we have multiple gears; so we can have usable torque and HP. Now if Hafþór Júlíus Björnsson takes over for you and does the turning, he can generate more torque than you. He may not be able to spin it much faster, but when you factor in gears, his torque will spin a gear faster, doing more work and hence more horsepower. I hope I didn't mess up too bad with that explanation. And we haven't even got to engine torque vs torque at wheels....
@YourMom-nl4uw
@YourMom-nl4uw 5 років тому
Catfish Cave Fooking spot on, m8. Understood your explanation better.
@fluffigverbimmelt
@fluffigverbimmelt 5 років тому
10/10 explanation, in a fraction of video time
@joshualehman685
@joshualehman685 5 років тому
I'm glad you wrote so I didn't have to
@HawkStealth
@HawkStealth 5 років тому
Your explanation complemented the above video!
@navinmari3716
@navinmari3716 5 років тому
O.k
@Quatt22
@Quatt22 6 років тому
I wish all of my college professors were as clear and concise as this!
@terencedsouza2885
@terencedsouza2885 6 років тому
Quatt22 true that
@joydeeptutan
@joydeeptutan 2 роки тому
Thanks Bro, I am a great lover of science and tech, but I was bit confused. Now you cleared me most. I will watch once again
@mostafaali-bg8dk
@mostafaali-bg8dk 3 роки тому
Thank you man for the amazing information, it’s my first time to watch you and guess what, i’m subscribing🔥🔥
@robertdurst4923
@robertdurst4923 3 роки тому
A great explanation (after multiple rewinds). I’d love to see a follow up video of this in practice - building on the concepts explained with a couple of vehicles with varying hp & tourque. Dare I say... factor in electric engines too?
@Ghost_Hybrid
@Ghost_Hybrid 6 років тому
Think of torque as how hard your pistons are pushing with each crank, and horsepower is the combined energy of each push over a fixed period of time. The more times that torque can be applied, the higher your power output will be. The faster your engine turns over, the harder it is for the engine to apply torque, since the pistons are already in motion. It’s like trying to hit a baseball which is already moving away from you. That’s why torque tapers in the high rev range, but power continues to increase, since you have so many cranks per minute!
@zecc81
@zecc81 6 років тому
CitizenEJ257 He was definitely a little contradictory. He stated you "feel" the most acceleration at peak torque but then explicitly stated peak acceleration happens at peak power. By definition, accelerating faster at peak power means that would also cause the most g-force, aka acceleration that you would feel. Not sure what his motivation was there.
@AzuMentch36
@AzuMentch36 6 років тому
And here I thought horsepower was a arbitrary number, compared to the practical torque. XD
@BlacksterVFX
@BlacksterVFX 6 років тому
zecc81 He wasn't contradictory, because he was talking about acceleration in a given gear in one case and at given speed in the other case.
@--Lam
@--Lam 6 років тому
Took you two sentences to explain what this video doesn't clearly state, even though it should be the sole purpose of the video. I'm at a loss how someone can spend 7 minutes repeatedly contradicting himself and mixing terms, and get 10k likes. And you just removed the contradiction in one paragraph. Good job, sir, you should apply for EE's ghost writer.
@android175
@android175 6 років тому
Lam if you can't clearly understand what the video states then you are the problem.
@shakeelahmed07
@shakeelahmed07 Рік тому
Your way of explaining is so easy to grasp
@michaeld5888
@michaeld5888 Рік тому
I always remember on our local dual carriageway on my cheap and nasty long stroke 250cc CZ motorbike sedately chugging past a Yamaha 125cc which had probably double the horsepower with the other rider lying flat on the tank trying to make way in to the head wind. A good demonstration of torque and a rare and memorable memory at not feeling at the bottom end of motorcycle ownership.
@F1Farmer
@F1Farmer 6 років тому
This has become my favorite UKposts channel. Keep up the great work!
@EngineeringExplained
@EngineeringExplained 6 років тому
So kind, thank you!!
@noneya6334
@noneya6334 6 років тому
Engineering Explained - yea man, nice
@ChristopherHepner
@ChristopherHepner 6 років тому
Same here
@jeff5798
@jeff5798 3 роки тому
I loved the joke at the end about how it cleared up the differences between hp and torque
@EmptyRoad
@EmptyRoad 3 роки тому
A good explanation I understood: You can leverage torque, meaning the force applied will be greater but the lenght of the leverage arm will increase linear. So the power is always the same, as long as you move your arm in the same speed aa before. When you increase the speed you will increase the power, while the torque applied stays the same. In ICE cars its not only the speed which increases but also the torque, at least at low rpms. Thats why you get a very step power increase. Then torque will start to drop, but not as fast as speed (rpm) increases, so power will still increase. This explaination will give you the answer, why a human cannot have the same hp as a car although with a large leverage arm the torque applied by human hand could be greater: you cannot do it with 7000 revolutions per minute
@enveloreal
@enveloreal 8 місяців тому
Here's what I got: Horsepower is just the rate at which the torque from the explosions are applied. Higher rpm, more explosions providing force, more power. Longer connecting rods will increase torque through leverage but will move slower, so the overall horsepower will remain the same. Torque increases with rpm because at low rpm, there is less fuel (and less force from the explosion) with every revolution of the pistons. At high rpm, much more fuel is needed to keep the speed up so there is more torque. Torque drops off at high rpm due to friction and the limited speed of combustion itself; the explosions don't have enough time to finish before the piston bottoms out. Like you said though, the revs still increase which compensates for the loss in torque, so horsepower still increases albeit not as quickly. Higher displacement engines can burn more fuel per revolution and thus provide more power/torque (and longer strokes can give combustion more time to complete). An important point of the video is the note on gearing. Many claim that horsepower doesn't matter and torque is what you feel, which is true to some extent, but it is misleading in that the power can be manipulated to increase that torque. Engines with less horsepower and naturally high torque can't be manipulated to produce more torque than a naturally high-horsepower low-torque engine could. This also means that torque at the wheels can be completely different from torque at the crank depending on the gear ratios being used. This is a very fascinating concept to me and I'm glad I can finally understand it.
@Theaxemandaily
@Theaxemandaily Рік тому
Your videos really helped me understand engines, and they way they function.
@deano59cobrablog93
@deano59cobrablog93 3 роки тому
when i started racing speedway i was told hp is how fast you hit the wall and torque is how far you move it lol
@KarlBryngelsson
@KarlBryngelsson 3 роки тому
That’s a quote from Top Gear 👍🏼
@felixbeutin9530
@felixbeutin9530 3 роки тому
engineers around the world cringing
@Road_to_Goku
@Road_to_Goku 3 роки тому
He has a video disproving this
@HunterFireShield
@HunterFireShield 3 роки тому
how far you move it would be work i think
@AIR_RAM_PERF
@AIR_RAM_PERF 3 роки тому
@@KarlBryngelsson - that quote has been around a lot longer than top gear has... just saying.
@oscarpauzer651
@oscarpauzer651 5 років тому
What a Simple, Objective and Clear explanation. Congrats and Thank You Very, Very Much.
@rigididiot
@rigididiot 2 роки тому
One of the best "simple" explanations I have ever seen. If one does not get it after this, that person will never get it.
@Ryan-ix6dt
@Ryan-ix6dt 2 роки тому
Crazy! I remember watching this a while back and not understanding it but after just taking physics mechanics in college I easily understand it now.
@surendrabhakuni1639
@surendrabhakuni1639 2 роки тому
Correct
@maisumsyed
@maisumsyed 6 років тому
Loved the video! This is the best explanation of this topic I have found
@situmapw8219
@situmapw8219 4 роки тому
More confused than I was before watching 🤣😭
@MultiPleaser
@MultiPleaser 4 роки тому
Physics is quite confusing. Here's a reply I gave to a comment that came a bit after yours, maybe it'll help: We [racers] do. We spend as much time at peak power as possible. This means as low a gear as possible. First gear gives 50% more acceleration than second gear. Second gives 33% more than third. And so on and so forth. Another note, engines aren't most efficient at peak torque. That's where peak intake air velocity occurs, and you cram the most air and fuel into the same volume. So, you get the most energy for that particular explosion, meaning peak torque. And there's more, lots more. Here's a reply I have to the comment just after yours, maybe it'll help some: Well, power equals force times velocity, not force times acceleration. You're forgetting that doubling your velocity makes four times the energy. Weird, right? So, even if power peaks a little later in the revs than torque, it is still directly proportional to rpm, not proportional to the square of rpm. Also, you have to take the area under the curve, you know, calculus (whatever that is, I forget) to get the total change in energy of the system. Long story short, peak acceleration occurs at peak torque. Here's the clincher. First gear gives the most leverage, and the most acceleration of any gear. Second gear gives less acceleration, but more speed. However, the engine is still making the same power in second gear as it did in first. Weird, right? But, since power equals force times velocity, we see that force decreaes because velocity has increased. Less force, less acceleration. So, second gear compared to first gear is the same idea as a higher rpm compared to a lower rpm. Ah ha!
@sander_bouwhuis
@sander_bouwhuis 4 роки тому
@@MultiPleaser This is the best explanation so far (especially the second half)!
@stevenreichertart
@stevenreichertart 4 роки тому
Me too 😂
@michaelwinter3132
@michaelwinter3132 4 роки тому
This might not be utterly correct, but good enough and it helped me a lot: torque is the horsepower of each explosion.
@dantechills9985
@dantechills9985 3 роки тому
Too much words, less 3xamples. The easiest which is the best was to undesrtand something is with examples rather than words.
@orgrg1525
@orgrg1525 3 роки тому
I think explicitly stating (or showing how) you can compensate for less torque with gearing but you can't compensate for less hp with anything helps clarify.
@ranjan8022
@ranjan8022 3 роки тому
I think YES
@dkoning373
@dkoning373 2 роки тому
Great explanation, I really like your videos! You just got yourself a new sub!
@Bigbuddyandblue
@Bigbuddyandblue 3 роки тому
Peak Toque was my favorite Monkee. So sad when he passed away.
@codthebomb13
@codthebomb13 6 років тому
So many people will understand this practical/theoretical analysis much easier than some of the mathematical explanations he uses in most videos 😁 this makes is very easy to understand though. Great work 🖒
@EngineeringExplained
@EngineeringExplained 6 років тому
Happy to hear it, thanks!
@Anistus101
@Anistus101 3 роки тому
I love the way you explain it all. Thank you so much.
@diegov3211
@diegov3211 2 роки тому
Probably one of the best torque vs hp explanations.
@MrBusta-zj1ec
@MrBusta-zj1ec 6 років тому
I had that confusion for a long time , I asked my brother to explain but I still had the confusion ... You have done a great job of in explaining , now I have no confusion! Thanks!
@customds
@customds 5 років тому
Dude you're the best. I was asked this a few weeks ago and couldntbexplain it properly. You made it so simple. Thanks so much for the great videos!
@EngineeringExplained
@EngineeringExplained 5 років тому
Happy to hear it, thanks for watching!
@bheemshankar_pk
@bheemshankar_pk Рік тому
So good can’t express in words wish to learn more from you keep up the good work
@ioansolovastru1987
@ioansolovastru1987 11 місяців тому
Thank you! You are very good at explanations and visuals.
@ploperdung
@ploperdung 5 років тому
thank you! I've been wondering this for awhile. You explained it really well, good job mate
@WarpedPerception
@WarpedPerception 6 років тому
Yeah baby !! ... Finally, torque and horsepower explained simply. I'm linking this video to my upcoming episode of blowing up see-through engine, match made in heaven !!!, you'll see what I'm talking about Jason.... Fantastic !
@Furantzu
@Furantzu 6 років тому
Loved the airbag Merc and the bottle experiment!
@WarpedPerception
@WarpedPerception 6 років тому
Furantzu thanks , next up is E.1 of See-Through Rotary Engine, posts Friday.
@dallenhaven3329
@dallenhaven3329 4 місяці тому
Third time I’ve watched this. I come back every 2 or 3 years for a refresher to make sure I don’t forget little things. Thanks for the video!
@gemmaphobic6233
@gemmaphobic6233 Рік тому
Thank you so much! I can now actually explain what torque is and mostly understand what you were saying in the latter half of the video :)
@joejarvis2497
@joejarvis2497 4 роки тому
Your explanation here is the clearest I have heard so far. Thank you for the video.
@chrispavlopoulos176
@chrispavlopoulos176 3 роки тому
I love you man!!!!!! 46 years old man here always had that question in the back of my head but never actually asked anyone. Today out of nowhere i stumbled on your video by accident and watched it . It is so amazing the experience i mean, when you meet a true educator that have this ability and charisma to explain complicated maters to people that have no clue or any idea about the specific subject. After all when you cant explain something to a 5 year old it means you dont truly know that something! Love from Sweden keep up the good work!
@surendrabhakuni1639
@surendrabhakuni1639 2 роки тому
Great sir.
@YoungDon4858
@YoungDon4858 11 місяців тому
Loved the video ,you answered my question that I had for years and you confirmed my theory I had for years.!!!
@b577960
@b577960 2 роки тому
Explained well and understood it because it was so well explained- many thanks
@marjuan9426
@marjuan9426 4 роки тому
i changed my mind, i prefer to buy 1 horse with chariot. The End.
@AMG43ramirez
@AMG43ramirez 4 роки тому
Horsepower sells cars torque wins races. - Carrol Shelby
@jimmicrackhead12
@jimmicrackhead12 4 роки тому
They are same
@MartijnvanderHage
@MartijnvanderHage 4 роки тому
But how is That my Audi rs5 (450 hp 430 nm) is Faster then a tuned Audi s5 With 428 hp and 520 nm ) witch is also a bit lighter ?
@michaelriquelme831
@michaelriquelme831 4 роки тому
@@MartijnvanderHage yeah but the s5 get the final speed sooner that your rs5.... I test it in gt3 for ps2..... Tunning gears and engines. ...
@TheSteinbitt
@TheSteinbitt 4 роки тому
marty7604 because you have more power, didn’t you watch the vid? :p
@Adrian-rt8se
@Adrian-rt8se 4 роки тому
You can only choose 1 torque or power. You cant have it all. If you want top speed like highway races choose power. If you want to win races in a print choose torque. Thats why a Lambo cant beat Tesla in a 400m sprint because of this matter.👍
@polymetric2614
@polymetric2614 Рік тому
i think it might be helpful to see a graph of wheel torque over engine speed at each gear
@Piracanto
@Piracanto 7 місяців тому
Yes! That would mean changing the transmission would change the torque numbers but not the HP?
@giuzp95
@giuzp95 11 місяців тому
Euro Truck Simulator 2 brought me here. I needed to understand which truck I will use. You explained both simple and straight. Thanks!
@martinsvinklers9307
@martinsvinklers9307 6 років тому
He is better teacher than all my teachers combined. Bruh.
@EngineeringExplained
@EngineeringExplained 6 років тому
Haha I appreciate the kind words!
@Monkeyrides123
@Monkeyrides123 5 років тому
than all your teachers columbined? eh.. eh? no? okay...
@WikWak
@WikWak 3 роки тому
Literally 1% of the people in the comments understand it. 89% think they understand but still dont get it, it and 10% are still like.... what
@JSBax
@JSBax 3 роки тому
My take away is that stated torque figures are basically irrelevant, however they measure it, because torque at the rear wheel is mediated by gearing and peak effective torque is actually defined by peak hp. Is that right? He didn't say that but it sounds like that. Which would mean engine torque stats are useful purely to create a torque curve that demonstrates power distribution / feel through the rev range. (And this graph is practically, if not literally, scale invariant.) In which case... Wtf do stated torque figures come from and why does the industry keep insisting they're relevant?
@WikWak
@WikWak 3 роки тому
@@JSBax yes John, thats correct. God knows why people allways quote torque figures 🤦‍♂️ Its a measurement, but not a measurement of power output.
@amjan
@amjan 3 роки тому
@@JSBax Perfectly said John. Torque is what the engine creates, power is what the actual car can output.
@lukas6610
@lukas6610 3 роки тому
Isnt it because if you have more torque you get to the peak power faster and you wont need as much gear changes
@WikWak
@WikWak 3 роки тому
@@lukas6610 the power curve is another thing alltogeather. Something people will allways say is "2 strokes have no torque" Its not true, they have a lot more torque than their 4 stroke counterparts, but they *feel* like they have no torque because their power curve is very peaky.
@niceguy4801
@niceguy4801 Рік тому
Man you save me a lot of time for my curiosity while studying elective thankyou so much
@balamurugan1985
@balamurugan1985 2 роки тому
Thank you friend, I saw this video very late, but it's more informative and understandable in a simple way..i apericiated.... good work..
@MrComerford77
@MrComerford77 4 роки тому
As a former motor head we always said torque gets you off the line power makes you finish. I been a Auto tech since 1996 and what the automotive industry has done with small displacement engines is truly amazing. The power numbers from 4 cyl engines is truly amazing.
@bootchop88
@bootchop88 4 роки тому
vape ?
@stargazer7644
@stargazer7644 3 роки тому
That's pretty close. Torque gets you off the line, power determines how long it takes to finish.
@michaelstrongbow2336
@michaelstrongbow2336 3 роки тому
Camaro's with a turbo 4cly making 275hp and 295lbs, I wish we had four bangers like that when I was in HS. I'm pretty sure it would beat the 350 from the 80's and 90's.
@mohammedbadeea773
@mohammedbadeea773 6 років тому
Man, I just love how you explain things in such a simple way. One of the best channels honestly. 👍🏻
@EngineeringExplained
@EngineeringExplained 6 років тому
Thank you thank you!!
@domalash
@domalash 2 роки тому
This video and someone else's is helping me understand the relationship between torque, rpms and horsepower. I think the main problem is that I've never fully understood torque. I mean it's obvious and easy to understand in some ways but it's not something you can visualize. I think I have the same problem with volts. I get current because I can visualize it flowing but volts seems to be a relationship between current and resistance so it's not a tangible thing, it's a relationship. I think if someone said torque is not a thing it's a relationship then I would of understood it many years ago. Basically it's a force so it is power but influenced by distance and leverage which makes it always a force under a gear ratio. And that gives it a relationship with the actual initial force I guess.
@darthvader1402
@darthvader1402 11 місяців тому
Thank you for this video. It was very clear and I think I better understand now. I did wonder what it was about as I have been looking at buying a new car with turbo and did not understand the torque number.
@welltekdiagnostics6835
@welltekdiagnostics6835 6 років тому
Your reviews reflects how Awesome is your Video..Thank you is not enough you deserve way more than thank you
@franciscofernandez8909
@franciscofernandez8909 5 років тому
welltek diagnostics
@Top10girl
@Top10girl 6 років тому
Thank you for that easy to understand explanation!
@EngineeringExplained
@EngineeringExplained 6 років тому
Very welcome, glad you found it helpful!
@cooly350
@cooly350 7 місяців тому
Thanks for clearing it out
@himanshuverma5039
@himanshuverma5039 3 роки тому
This video is really good, thanks for explaining 👍
@RAJESHKUMAR-jz5go
@RAJESHKUMAR-jz5go 6 років тому
Superbro. I am able to clarify most of my doubts via your video. Thanks a lot
@MrTStat
@MrTStat 4 роки тому
so, a funny story here, I was trying to make hummus when the blender gave up on me, so being the nerd I am, I was trying to understand what exactly happened... here I am 3 hours later deep in researching power and Torque I just wanted some hummus!!
@awesomenitin
@awesomenitin 4 роки тому
I hope you had it by now, it has been 6 days now, i am worried for you :p
@konp368
@konp368 4 роки тому
Try some Toum :) By the way, can you send a link for your hummus recipe? Thank you.
@bimwapshimmiesham8068
@bimwapshimmiesham8068 4 роки тому
Did you make the hummus tho?
@marwanazzam4160
@marwanazzam4160 4 роки тому
Use a food processor. Much better than a blender :)
@jwickert3
@jwickert3 4 роки тому
What about the hummus? You left us hanging!
@techie7935
@techie7935 2 роки тому
Very well put video mate. Thanks from Australia
@JoeBlow-ch4jy
@JoeBlow-ch4jy 2 роки тому
Listened to it 3 times and understand approx 50% of what he's saying as I follow along trying to decipher my dyne graph.
@al_chafai7900
@al_chafai7900 6 років тому
u lost me half way,gonna keep rewatching it till i get it 100%,great video man,keep it up.
@Boomslang1
@Boomslang1 6 років тому
Mixed Content Same here, lol.
@guacamoleman87
@guacamoleman87 6 років тому
god man, shut up. People learn at different rates
@MCOGroupNews
@MCOGroupNews 6 років тому
Matt Moleman just like cars accelerate at different rates :)
@AdoteAzhar
@AdoteAzhar 6 років тому
It's called turbo lag, don't feel bad.
@arievianza
@arievianza 6 років тому
same here
@MarkAAshdown
@MarkAAshdown 4 роки тому
Great video. Especially impressed with the ability of being able to utilise medieval units of measurement.
@sukalyanhalder4068
@sukalyanhalder4068 3 роки тому
You have explained so nicely n so simply. Thanks a lot.
@Jani.__.
@Jani.__. Рік тому
Nice explanation, finally understood the difference.
MIND BOGGLING ENGINE GEOMETRY - Rod Ratio Explained
18:43
driving 4 answers
Переглядів 5 млн
FOOTBALL WITH PLAY BUTTONS ▶️ #roadto100million
00:24
Celine Dept
Переглядів 114 млн
No, Tesla Cybertruck Is *Not* Faster Than Porsche (While Towing)
12:34
Engineering Explained
Переглядів 2,7 млн
What Is Horsepower & Why It's A Dumb Unit - America vs Metric
12:22
Engineering Explained
Переглядів 591 тис.
FWD vs RWD vs 4WD vs AWD What's The Difference? Which is Better?
17:27
The Engineers Post
Переглядів 2,1 млн
Automatic vs Manual Transmission
7:47
Lesics
Переглядів 25 млн
Torque and Horsepower Explained! | The Shop Manual
6:19
RevZilla
Переглядів 487 тис.
Bore vs Stroke - What Makes More Power?
15:15
Engineering Explained
Переглядів 1,6 млн
HORSEPOWER VS TORQUE SIMPLEST EXPLANATION
3:20
The Maker
Переглядів 17 млн
The Difference Between AWD vs 4WD
5:02
Wonder World
Переглядів 11 млн
Will Thinner Oils Damage Your Engine?
12:40
Engineering Explained
Переглядів 3,7 млн
Why Do Horsepower And Torque Cross At 5,252 RPM?
6:07
Engineering Explained
Переглядів 1 млн
ЗАГОРЕЛСЯ пикап при ШИНОМОНТАЖЕ
0:29
ЛАЙФСТОРИ
Переглядів 1,6 млн
Перегон Урала Миасс Игарка #ремонт
0:59
Дневник полярника
Переглядів 854 тис.
Mustang had to flex the burnout
0:18
Exotic Rubber
Переглядів 56 млн
МОЩЬ АВТОЗВУКА (@lownotesgarage - TikTok)
0:16
В ТРЕНДЕ
Переглядів 845 тис.
Red colour Jetta logo install Part 1
0:14
Bilochpuratips Automobile
Переглядів 3,8 млн