🇺🇦

@@rocko7711 hooah

​@r😊😅😅😮ocko7711

Chappy! Good News! Trump just posted on TruthSocial that America Needs Ukraine to Win! That means any Trumper who disagrees is OFFICIALLY A RINO or a Socialist! Or BOTH!!! Woohoo!

Chappy!! Trump said on TruthSocial today that America Needs Ukraine to Win! That means any Republican who disagrees is officially a RINO by the Big Honcho himself!!!! This is Good News!!! Isn't this great!? Please acknowledge!!! D: ​@@Taskandpurpose

At the time they were.

The Russians got a lot of artillery ammunition from North Korea

NATO officer

its facinating to see what can change when you pour more of your countries resources into military

They are running out of tanks and afvs. The only reason they haven't is they're spending their Soviet inheritance. It's a nice trick but you can only use it once. If you want to learn more about it look at the recent loss data it's a lot of older Soviet era rolling stock. And if you cut it up month by month you can see it's getting older and older. As far as artillery shells if they weren't running out why would they bought all that s*** from North Korea?

No but they paid for 5 million bushings and got 1 million. Who knew corruption could be diverse yet so universal.

Ukriane aid:- 37 billions we have stolen... uh invested in fortifications" - Ukrainian politician Georgiy Birkadze makes gaffe on live TV😂😂

Russian bot spotted​@@menzbercedes8962

​@@menzbercedes8962Sure buddy, they have not received 30 billions in cash.

but how are we supposed to launder funds for black projects without the 90k$ bushings?

Russia: WAR ECONOMY. NATO: INFLATION TO THE MOON. FUCK THE PEASANTS>

this price is imposed because of the extra 3 millimeters

How else can NATO countries have higher per capita GDP? 😂

​@@DlanorAKnox-ur2bf Nope. It's got other things.

@@mikewlazlinski4309 I think dude is sarcastic of course is other thing. 😜

And yet the media would have you believe that Russia is more corrupt than the US.

I also saw this, those bag of bushings in china or Russia would cost 90 dollars. Not 90,000. I immediately thought of Fraud and the us Government taking tax payers money.

Capitalism. You want it - you got it)

@@DJAKONDATM no, just capitalism at the brink of corruption. Capitalism still is the best system, but as any man made system, it is just as weak as the people acting.

Money laundering.

What are they 10 or 20 to one in accuracy against the NATO artillery?

@@sqr2024 when you are flattening a city, accuracy not needed

@@sqr2024 it doesn't matter because after massive attack you'll be either dead either shell-shocked and won't be able to continue battle.

@@Adenrux0 It does matter because your logistics system has to move all those extra shells to the front.

Yeah its one of the main aspects in how they built their modern army though fortunately(or unfortunately if Ukraine goes on the Counter Offensive) their army is supposedly built to fight defensively rather than offensively relying on rail for most of their logistics.

Well, it doesn't exactly help that American keep denying that there even *is* a war...

The question is: Can they adapt quick enough?

well, democracy loses to autocracy in the speed of decision-making during war

​@highdefinist9697 what on Earth are you talking about?

@@highdefinist9697 Ukraine is not part of NATO or the EU. This is a tiny potato republic with no industry. But it has other advantages - legalization of drugs, corruption and cheap cocaine for Zelensky. For the United States, Ukraine is just a tool against Russia. Two years later, Russia has doubled the United States in terms of GDP growth (data from the World Bank), Germany is transferring industry to the United States, Biden is no longer shy about giving an invisible hand and stumbling. Both are pathetic losers.

Хорошая шутка, но потери убитыми и пропавшими без вести, 50-100 тысяч за войну. Если кто-то сомневается, не сомневайтесь. Большие потери, не позволили бы сейчас наступать.

@@user-oi5lg6im7j Все потерянные жизни - это трагедия, и я не сомневаюсь, что на фронте существует мрачная реальность потерь. Шутка, которую я отпустил, была невкусной, извини. Огромное количество невменяемых людей в Интернете любят думать о погибших россиянах и восполняют усугубляющиеся потери, чтобы почувствовать себя лучше. Война печальна для всех и многие погибли в реальности за малое. Извините, если моя шутка пришла с злонамеренного места.

and they really are, europeans think they are smarter then americans and here we are, they been pulled into into this madness following the masters orders

А мне не нравится , они в массе сами дебилы , если судить о их искусстве и массовой культуре 😂

I don't think so. People in the USA don't pay any attention to the outside world at all.

Russia using WW2 tanks is in fact pretty stupid.

@@AL-lh2ht Having no tanks is much dumber. Look at the stockpiles of nations. No allied nation has a large supply of modern tanks, they are just too expensive. This is why during war time everyone resorts to quantity over quality to win. The USSR lost 3x in tanks during the Battle of Kursk, but the Germans were far outnumbered by the sheer number of tanks and since Berlin was 1700km away then they couldn't simply resupply.

Always has been since even the napelonic era

Or if in Russian motto of the Rocket troops and artillery "Artillery -- god of war"

BREAKING NEWS; Ukraine removes all Abrams tanks from frontlines for fear of losing them in blattle Well there goes your 10 million dollar western wonder that was suppose to make russians flee for their lives ROFL,..

Even more so with the advent of drone warfare.

I would argue drones are king in this day of age

They are two very different system, so suggesting that one replaces the other doesn't make much sense. One 155mm artillery projectile costs ~$1000, maybe up to $3000. A ballistic precision rocket, by comparison, is easily $100k+. While the latter is better in basically every way, it's essentially a quality vs quantity question, and sometimes the extra quality isn't so important, so you just want extreme quantities. So, they serve very different strategic purposes.

It does not. But it is and will be important anyway. Just like tanks.

is not "old school" if the shell travels for 50 miles.

millions of rounds matter.

In 100 years, artillery will still be the king of battlefield.

Wasn't it the BBC? I'm quite sure the media who reported it quoted a british intelligence report.

Them Russian shovels sure hit different!

Then they strapped shovels to bombs to make glide bombs. 😂

They were wrong... No reason to repeat someones wrong assumptions over and over.

How tf do you do that ? 😂

Simple concept these UKpostsrs refuse to understand.

Don't forget Russian leaders pocketing military funds to buy themselves a yacht.

Do you work for free?

@@StandTallTx that NAFO brain of yours can't grasp reality. Too many fake news big macs for nutrition.

@@StandTallTx This is propaganda.... You will find the most thieves and corrupt officials in the USA.. However, their corrupt actions will never lead to imprisonment. Because they run the United States

the west's 'interests overseas' they rely on are the stockpiles of 2nd and 3rd world nations which they strongarm and, in the case of countries like pakistan, outright overthrow the governments of in order to procure the goods they need. It's the same way america has 'interests' in syria. these cost cutting measures are coming back to haunt the west -- there are only so many countries that can be pressured to send aid for the west.

BREAKING NEWS; Ukraine removes all Abrams tanks from frontlines for fear of losing them in blattle Well there goes your 10 million dollar western wonder that was suppose to make russians flee for their lives ROFL,

Having learned about the absolute state of British military readiness, this whole Ukraine debacle must really be twisting the knife.

@@matiasd.c9949 BREAKING NEWS: You have to weld tortoise shells over your tanks because their amour is complete trash... ROFLMAO. And you used a comma as a fullstop because you're educated in Ruzzia.

@@Mgrow ..But those Russian tanks are cheap unlike the over priced over hyped Abrams and Leopards ROFL

I don't think munitions from Iran and North Korea qualify as an "outside aid". Neither Iran nor N. Korea can afford to provide "aid" to Russia. Instead, they are getting cash, various concessions, credits and other benefits from Russia in exchange for their shells.

"3*(his edit#1) million munitions of other type including [etc.]" Go figure, good old trick Russia (and other people) also use when counting (12000-23000) tank

Because Russian leadership is smarter than clowns leading the West.

This is correction I was looking for, I would like to point out that the most recent US army numbers given to Congress point out that the Army plants will reach the 100k 155mm shells a month sooner than expected next year, that means 1.2Million of just the 155mm for the US alone, that is enough to feed every Ukrainian cannon easily, with an European step up, it will out produce Russia by late next year easily.

If I understand correctly, Russians count short-range rocket launcher tubes (e. g., MLRS), tank guns and mortars as artillery, so that does add up to 3 million artillery equivalent rounds produced in Russia. Westerners make a distinction between rockets, so the clarification is helpful. Thanks.

Unlike the west, where they just shut the whole thing and outsource everything...Putin's smart.

That's Soviet/Russian doctrine in a nutshell. A factory in my city used to produce missile guidance units. With the fall of the USSR they started to produce civilian electronics, with only one part of a factory still producing aiming modules. Now, as I've heard, they are producing mostly guidance modules again since that's more important.

That’s because the US is funding spaceX instead of NASA projects, which is years behind schedule and actually going nowhere.

@@stap1er the reason they’re funding space x and not nasa is due to cost effectiveness, Space X launches every week and for the majority of the time is able to recover their boosters. Look at the price of SLS, Look at the Price of the Delta 4 Heavy. Space X is going somewhere considering they already have launched 6-7 missions to the ISS, and launch multiple times a week- they have hit such a fast laumch cadance that we know they’re capable of launching 3 times under 24 hours (because they have already done it.) in fact, Crew Dragon is the only natively made capsule that flies to the iss. Where is dream liner? Where is orion? Where is dream chaser?

...and then during some wars in Netherlands "back in time" there were some "joint comitees" supervising safety of dams and windmills (doing the drainage pumping) while soldiers of both sides happily killed each other on battlefields... And, oh, BTW, yes - that "joint" means exactly that, military engeeners frm BOTH sides of the conflict. But I digress here, and, erm... what's yer point? If any, that is...?

@@MrKotBonifacy my point is you're too dumb to understand context.

US rejected new contract with Roscosmos for new engine in 2019. Thats why US astronauts need russian rockets to reach ICS 😂😂😂

read that in Wargame red Dragon voice

What voice?​@@brutalikcz532

He was very gay ....

LMAO i saw Federick and Im like what Someone quoted me ! My middle name haha)

@@rubengutierrez19 I think i played the Brits most. So probably British faction voice.

They aren't very good at defending the skies from drones, & missiles, tho.

@@elmerkilred159 They are good, better than the "western" world.

@@elmerkilred159no one is cost effectively

@@elmerkilred159 better than others arguably. Their ew is so aggressive, it causes a lot of suppression of own capabilities.

@@elmerkilred159 have you actually looked at the size of russia? Thats a LOT of territory to defend. I reckon that if the USA were subjected to drone and missile attacks they would get through as well.

Similar modern research is afoot in Finland, which can't grow cotton because of the climate alone, but has a handle on paper and pulp production like no other. While feasible, the process is tricker because of higher levels of impurities in wood-based cellulose. Interestingly, eucalyptus trees look most promising, fast-growing and combustible as they are.

And week , they have alot industrial week on Siberia

@@peabase finalnd cant grow eucalyptus either

@@jebise1126 Duh.

@@jebise1126 You can grow it elsewhere and ship the lumber to finnland. That aside n-cellulose is not hight tech and can be produced by any nation. Just thanks to certain EU bans on fertilizer, Russia can use the industrial capacity of its cheap electricity to make lots of n-celulose with the n-acid. BTW the unused fertiliser can also be used for military purposes. 🔥

More correct - "Best" is the enemy of "good"

It's not a uniquely Russian saying, it's a common proverb going back centuries and popularized in Europe by Voltaire "Perfect is the enemy of good"

Not sure but Stalin said that quantity can be its own quality.

Thought it was french.

@@phild9963 He did!

A lot of WW1 artillery was 75mm light howitzers, that basically were used in the same way that we use mortars now

@@mrvwbug4423 True, but there was also a lot of very heavy artillery that is no longer seen. Another stat to put modern artillery usage into perspective. During the battle of Vimy Ridge, the Canadians used over 1 million rounds fired from 1100 guns in 2 weeks. That amount is only used every couple of months across the entire front in the Russo-Ukranian war.

Yea, point of contention is use of the word most. Some ww1 artillery was of a larger than 155 calibre.

​@@ironmantooltimebut then we talk about a few hundred shels at the very largest side. In ukraine almost all shells are 155mm (there are some 105mm). There are also 120 and 80mm mortor that is not counted as artilery. Consider that the 80mm would be more powerfull than the 75mm from ww1 and the 120mm would be more powerfull than pretty much any field gun at that time.

But its something that completely alluded the officials that run the UK, US and EU. And all of our media outlets. Tells us all we need to know

I agree, I think that we generally don't remotely have any clue what a group of people/resources the size of a nation's surplus can do when set to one purpose. I think the numbers are just too large for our minds to remotely conceptualize. It's just staggering what even a 'small' country could actually do when they split off even a small chunk of the non-subsistence/bare bones economy (population and resources) to a single purpose.

It still take more thinking than average murican can produce

3 million isnt even taht much. In 1916 for example, Germany produced a total of 36 Million shells per year. Russia doesnt even produce 10% of that

It's about the land that international corporations have bought. from German banks to US corporations. Everyone has their fingers on Ukrainian soil and that's why the war is not over. The West doesn't want to lose its land. and the Ukrainian farmers are dying at the front. And then another farm can be bought up, they come home when they can, and work as slaves for western companies for 160 euros. Hurrah , Through complicated association agreements, the crème de la crème of the world's largest capital owners find themselves as lenders to the Ukrainian agricultural giants. These include Vanguard Group, Goldman Sachs, Banque National de Paris, Kopernik Global Investors, Norges Bank Investment and a number of others. As creditors of “Kernel Holding”, the Danish banking group ING Bank, the Landesbank Baden-Württemberg and the Austrian Raiffeisen secure influence on crop yields. Behind “UkrLandFarming”, which has to service external loans worth an estimated $1.6 billion, are the US fund Gramercy LLC, the Export-Import Bank of the USA and Deutsche Bank.[12] The Ukrainian fields are therefore at the mercy of the international network of capital managers via lease agreements and lenders. The recent history of the sell-off of Ukrainian black earth soils can be impressively demonstrated using the example of the US private equity fund “NCH Capital”. Founded in 1993 by George Rohr and Moris Tabacinic, the two collected well-capitalized investors for Ukrainian and Russian agricultural goods and benefited early on from the privatization rush after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The money flowed to tax havens such as Cyprus and the Cayman Islands via offshore companies. “NCH Capital” played a key role in land reform in Ukraine when its CEO George Rohr attended high-level meetings between the Ukrainian President and the US Secretary of Commerce in 2015, a year after Maidan. These ultimately led to Kiev agreeing to the IMF reform plan, which subsequently led to the liberalization of the land market.[13] To secure its business, “NCH Capital” has some of the most important pension funds in the USA behind it, which are invested in the company. Across industries, these include the funds of Dow Chemicals, General Electric, Lockheed Martin, Merseyside, Honeywell International, Harvard University, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and many others.[14] They all benefit from the fertility of Ukrainian land.and that is the truth, the Ukrainians are not dying for freedom but for western corporations who are afraid of losing their ground,,,thanks for this democracy hurrah hurraaa,, ,

oh that? dat's just me cosplayin' ; o

@@Taskandpurpose I ain't shaming yah. Men gotta play too.

@@Rexolaboy I know, I know , believe me I lost any shame I had about 5 years ago when I started doing this non sense haha

@@Taskandpurpose and im glad, your skits are always great. We need more "Hooah Chop!"'s.

Ahh i was wondering like wtf lol whys he got NODS on LMAO and hiding behind that tree I don't think anyone could see you if like you know it was night and your just there lmao for some reason hahah You remind me of a Print Shoot Repeat YT demonetization Intro Skit with that Clip lol Very Smooth idk anyone else get that vibe PSR VIBE?ahah!

Its a meme clip, get your info right

I'm sure your work was still appreciated 🇺🇸

As a noob using simple logic knew already the today outcome. While people were laughing at Russia a year or two ago.

Former gunnery officer in the Australian army, those 155's with airburst are lethal at 50m blast radius, with serious risk of shrapnel wounds at 75 metres

Why do you hate capitalism?

@@xc43the’s a Rus disinformation bot. I wonder how many accounts he operates

​@@xc43tLOL

I do but I hate dictators more ​@@xc43t

​@@xc43tcan't end capitalism til we have globalization.

mcgregor was a tank battalion commander i thought

And there ain't no fighter better! He is going to knock out flyod Mayweather

He was a tank commander, I believe

@@Burboss yeah maybe not battalion commander prob squadron or troop commander , from inside a tank

@@Burboss self propelled artillery fell under his command

Exactly. 1 kg package of rivets, which costs $90K? Wow, such theft.

@@user-nn7ni3et5j It's time to go back to the original source of the story; you've been had by rumor corruption. The info I have is that these are bushings for the bomb racks in the B-2; if so they are a short-run specialty item with demanding requirements, and one bag is enough for at least 5% of the entire 20 bomber fleet. I'm not saying $90K is a fair price for a bag of these bushings, but they aren't $2 parts with a giant markup either.

i do wonder where that came from. because russia has their own chip fabs, they don't import chips, they make them..

@@andyf4292 ad hominem attacks from anti russian people.

@@andyf4292 Generally, vast majority of people believe the mainstream media (propaganda) in their respective countries, so when western media span the washing machine articles, most believed it, despite the stupidity. Same as the articles about shovels, ww1 wave tactics and etc etc etc.

​@@andyf4292 Lol this is pure propaganda. No company in Russia can independently manufacture chips without outside parts. Semiconductor supply chains are massive. Even China struggles with manufacturing chips independently. Huawei's newest chips were made with ASML (Dutch) lithography machines. Putin is hoping to be able to manufacture 28nm chips by 2027. For reference, chips used in modern washing machines are typically 28nm. TSMC can produce 3nm chips and Intel can produce 7nm chips. This is why Russia has been desperately trying to circumvent sanctions by importing chips through their neighboring countries.

@@andyf4292 It's not that they can't make chips, it's that they can't make usable chips for today's devices because they have not miniaturized them the way western manufacturers have. The one commercially viable chip they did make in Russia is now made by TSMC in Taiwan. Russia is still making 180nm chips, about 10-15 years behind the west. And while Russia WAS going to build new fabs that would make smaller 65nm chips, they have no money left to do so because of the war. Putin screwed up again.

artillery then and now is different artillery then was alot cheaper than now and costed less to make and the nations were mobilizing for years

@@aotmoments7410 cost nothing to make for Germans. It was war effort, workers get bed, clothes and food. And don't go to the front lines because they were mostly women. I don't know about French 4.5 mil shells. They did raise the white flag and allowed to be invaded and conducted resistance operations. I don't see resistance firing 4.5 mill artillery shells but whatever, it could have been some other time of the war.

​@@Ludak021wrong war mate 😂

​@@Ludak021what are you babbling about

The accuracy modern artillery means that what took hundreds of rounds to achieve in ww1 can be done with a a time on target salvo of 4 or 5 rounds from a modern gun. Advances in targeting, fusing, and the radar analysis of actual trajectory of shells fired to compare them to the calculated trajectory, which can be corrected before the next round is fired to zero in, and result in 6 rounds fired in less than a minute all arriving within a few feet of the target. And the gun that fired them has already scooted away to avoid counterbatterry fire. I should clarify, that is what MODERN artillery can do. Much of Russia's vaunted artillery is literally ww1 and ww2 era scrap metal that can't hit the broad side of a barn, from INSIDE the barn. The Russians still have to fire hundreds of rounds to eventually blunder into their target, which is why despite having access to all those vaunted russian stockpiles, the Ukrainians are still thumbing their noses and mooning the Russians while shredding their columns when they try and advance, those brave russian meat puppets. LMAO.

wtf are you reading ¿ if you looked up some of the more serious youtubers out the you would know that russia has a 4-5 year time window until they run out of old tanks from the beginning of the war aka 2-3 years

from the today view

we were told 2 years ago that Kiev would fall.. but look at the SMO now 😂

I remember news about it kept reappearing until Bakhmut fell after witch it went silent and around late 2023 all reports about 3 million shells started

It's 1941,2024 everything change,even books have bias analysis.

there is also actual black powder used in the shells in small amounts . maybe the primer. i remember a video 6 months ago saying it's a problem in the usa because a black powder factory had exploded/ burned down and it was hard to source quantities.

@@ronblack7870 Yes, primer and accelerator.

Smokeless gunpowder =/= gunpowder (black)

I thought the German chemist Christian Friedrich Schönbein invented guncotton. Britannica describes the fortuitous discovery thus: "His discovery of guncotton began with an accident in his wife’s kitchen. When he used her cotton apron to wipe up some spilled nitric and sulphuric acid, it disintegrated, leading to his work on nitrocellulose".

Bots be running wild as well :)

@@ATomRileyA actually, its funny how bot-free this comments section is compared to some other US-focused military-themed channels, like check out binkov's comments whoa

this straight out of a south park episode.I laughed my ass off. I know it's not a joke but still. We europeans need too wake the f up.

Skill issue.😂

the EU has some strict regulations when it comes to the specific chemicals needed for artillery production , they are currently working hard to get around it right now

Western propaganda

Gotta buy those carbon credits before going to war.

Actually in period of mass mobilisation (fall of 2022) empolyers treated their "protection" as a salary bonus, thus kept salaries on lower market level. Some of my ex-colleagues moved to jobs for "protection" and had their income decreased. But those are engineers, idk how was it with blue collars. Also restirctions for people with acces to classified information became very strict. Like previosly with access of level 2 (out of 3, with 1 the most strict) you could go abroad anytime you wanted but had to notify employer. Now that's impossible and even pepole with the 3rd (weakest) lvl might have problems with traveling. So another disadvantage.

В России нет мобилизации, воюют контрактники.

@@user-os9rx6xe2w чо правда что ли? а что это такое было когда 300 тыщь в армию отправили?

Mars

Napoleon said : god fight on the side of the one with the best artillery

"The world consist of two types of people; Artillerymen and targets." - An artie operator, probably.

That's only because he had never heard of drones.

А генетику - буржуазной наукой. Почему мнение малообразованного людоеда должно кого-то волновать?

Roscosmos is definitely underrated

What about your SpaceX?

A horse and carriage will get you to town, too.

​@@peabaseyeah but if you use the horse more than your car : either the car isn't convienent enough, or the horse is a lot more effective to take you to the town. Or both

@@Yudhiswara Yeah, it's a mystery why we don't see more horse-drawn vehicles.

He found out when entered Russia.

is 122mm same as mortar? seems smart to me, 45kg is huge amount of materials and chance of hitting something is low without some hitech excalibur style ordnance. 155/152 only makes sense as dumb bomb if raw materials are cheap and abundant to make as many as staff can do.

This right here. A mayor advantage of the Soviet artillery is that they never abandoned regimental artillery support like the west did.

But Russia can't hit anything accurately so needs way more ammunition.

@@bittripper3530 You have to understand that during war, unlike counter guerrilla warfare, the enemy fields at least a company worth of troops at any given position, or at least a platoon if we are talking an ATGM anti tank company resource. It doesn't really matter if you hit exaclty one squad, the enemy will deploy in force in that terrain, meaning no shortage of targets.

Like it was said in the video, the west is betting on localized air superiority to make artillery unusable for the enemy. Ukraine can't do that, unfortunately.

can you please share the source with me? NATO and other sources I've looked at all state rockets / artillery at 3 million please send to capelluto@taskandpurpose.com !

@@Taskandpurpose sure, I just replied

@@Taskandpurpose I think Perun covered this topic in one of his recent videos also. There is no way that for the main equivalent NATO calibre that they exceed European and/or US production. That 3 million figure includes all calibres

@@Taskandpurpose They use other calibres in their artillery not only 152mm. Such as 122mm - Gvozdika, 100mm - AT Rapira cannon, 203mm - Pion and 115mm as some of their T-62s work as makeshift SPA.

@@Taskandpurpose According to the European Commission the EU has hit 1 million 155 mm shells annually (January 2024) and according to the US DOD the US ramp up will add by end of 2024 between 840,000 to 960,000 155 mm shells for 2024. So conservatively 2 million 155 mm shells. European production and US production will shift slightly in 2025 with European production continuing to go up, and US production hitting a plateau until more comes on line in 2026

You cannot imagine how true you are!!! Back in the USSR there was a joke about Russian "StroyBat" - military construction units - they were such terrible beasts that their primary weapon was a shovel, and higher ranks were afraid to give them kalashnikovs 😁

What did you use them for?

@@AlexanderTch rifle customizations i gues

they were shipped last year I believe, Ukraine claimed there was a high dud rate and inaccurate fire afterwards. Could it be misinformation ? absolutely. I think I flagged that part by saying "if we believe what Ukraine claims" how can we verify the dud rate? I have no idea. I would honestly have to research deeper into that aspect to know better

Several artillery men I talked with said that NK shells were fine, nothing fancy about them. A bit different from Russian/soviet ones, but not much

@@Taskandpurpose Thanks for the reply. Enjoying all the content recently as well as appreciate the consistent coverage of the conflict. I understand that's it's all grey area of how intel/propo is handled. I just dislike the over exgeration of flaws in the RUA. It feels like we(euro/us) are underestimating them or dangers a war similar to this would have on our own forces if sent expecting something else.

@@user-me5oq3kl4h Thanks for the context, if you don't mind me asking, if you have knowledge what's the current state of integration of wagnerian forces after the fracturing? Where they go? I saw a few vids of them talking about the NK shells floating around a while ago. This might be a situation to more seriously consider the anecdotal soldiers videos on situation, instead of Opp-State intelligence.

source - trust me bro

YEAH! you are well informed...

if they have 10x ammo than other side, that hurts.

source; CNN, BBC, DW, SLY NEWS and TRUST me bro.

​@@throughput6674show your work

More accurate take IMO, western artillery waits for target confirmation and fire to destroy discovered resistance points. Russian artillery looks at the map and marks down suspected areas of defence that are bombarded during their assault, no wait for confirmation.

Where's democracy?

Yup that's corporatism also known as FASCISM.

Democracy is fake freedom. Only freedom they have to pick from 2 clowns as president to pretend they have a choice. Pathetic losers. Not even free health care. Complete imbeciles.

​@@brown_shark706nowhere in NATO.

@@brown_shark706 The U. S. was never a democracy except at the local level. Its system was designed to be a hierarchy of popular republics with personal rights recognized and guaranteed by constitutions. Today it is deteriorating into a bureaucratic state under the malign influence of the fascist religion fused with neo-Marxism. Read "The Doctrines of Fascism" by Benito Mussolini and compare it with the opinions of the current political establishment. Notice in particular how everyone is pushed to look for a government solution first for every problem instead trusting in God to bless their own work.

You can't use chips from washing machines, if you have no washing machines.

@@highdefinist9697 No washing machines? After all, there is a free, nanotechnological and democratic Ukraine nearby, from which Russians steal washing machines. 😁 No shovels?. Russians make shovels from wood and then launched at 2000 km, they can even shoot down satellites with shovels.

@@highdefinist9697 That's what they've been saying all along all this fake analyst saying Russia is losing the war and all other nonsense, just to turn back and eat their own words, Am not talking about this channel in particular but the mainstream media

​@@highdefinist9697 As a russian I confirm that we don't have washing machines. My personal bear does the laundry for me

@@AEH-df7ho 😅😅😅

AIM.. 😂.. Russia dont aim they bomb big areas to hit something But that maybe explain why they Aim so bad because they FIRE BEFORE AIM😂

Pretty much true. During the Soviet times one of the artillerys main mission was to suprres ATGM fire, so they needed fire saturation. In order to support the tanks. Because while artillery was an important role, during Soviet times the tank was still considers the mayor force weapon. All other forces support the tanks, unlike in NATO thinking where infantry has a myth status. Artillery is just a better support arms than infantry becaouse of it's range and ability to quickly concentrates fires.

Yep, and they do it with cheap stuff and hit something. Unlike the US shoots million dollar rockets to hit something so you know why they don't care to aim. $90k bushings 😅😂!

Guffaw! Guffaw! Guffaw! You're so superior!

They actually say something like “3,3,3” and then fire

That’s hilarious. Kid doesn’t grok that the reference is to slave labor? 😂

because it's bullshit. kids his age go to school in Russia too. It's not 1940, buddy.

You're a imbacile for saying that and the fact you lied about the Russian kids is even more of a I'm an imbacile move

@@lebowskiunderachiever3591 It's a cute meme at least so who cares.

Brilliant joke! Approved ))

proofs, please

@@solderdesolder I have studied that case direct in German Archives. U can find this stuff only in German in Wiki or in some Military pages.

@@mauertal it was no real working big ammuniton fabs in that territories at that times

@@solderdesolder If u dont know something, PLEASE say "i dont know, can u tell me" and not THAT! 1943, alone in the middle Ukraine (without the Lemberg-Area, the Crimea and the Donbas incl. Charkiw) there where the heavy steal industrie comanies: Steel Mill Konstantinowka, Steel Mill Krivoy Rog, Steel Mill Taganrog, Steel Mill Saporoshje, Steel Mill Stalino, Rykowo, Asow Steel 1 + 2 in Mariupol in work! The biggest water power station in Saporischja got in FULL work on 01.01.1943 and produced more than twice as much energy, than needed in high consumption peaks!

@@mauertal LOL. 1. Most of Soviet ammunition plants, located in the western parts of USSR, was dismantled and evacuated to east in 1941. 2. All this fabs and plants (their parts that was remained after evacuation) was partially or badly destroyed during the course of hostilities, in 1941 - 1942. 3. Steel industrie mills is not ammunition fabs, it's very different sectors of industry.

And yet...Grozny is a beautiful city today.

That cost the Russian people a lot of money, then. Lots of roads not being mantained, hospitals needing everything, trains not being repaired...

​@@iberiksoderblomlol I wish my government can only have those problems if we're at war. We're at peace yet we have the same exact troubles so what gives?

@@adambrande The average Russian male lived almost 10 years shorter than their EU counterpart, and that was before the war

Well maybe the Dudayev and his gang should have thought about it before proceeding to commit suicide for their nation with their decisions. Wow such men fighting the russians by engaging in urban warfare using their own people as meat shields then crying when the russians stoped playing their little games.

Kiss Axs

Notably, however, most of those shells are going to the Russian ground forces, whereas many western shells are not going to Ukraine.

@@deriznohappehquite yeah, EU manufacturers are still exporting to other countries. Which is pretty frustrating tbh...

@@thegreatdane3627 And the U.S. Pentagon says its 3 Million 152mm shells. Hmm, Europe or the U.S. intelligence apparatus. I tend to notice Ukraine supporters look for the lowest "number" when they don't like what other allies say, Task & Purpose also made a comment about it that CNN went to the Pentagon and the Pentagon stated this. So I'm assuming 3+ million 152m shells + 2 Million Iranian and DPRK shells with the rest being rockets and other calibers.

And don't come at me with "Well you're picking the higher number from America because you're obviously a Vatnik!!!" when in reality if I was that I would go with Russian Minister of Defence Shoigu's number of 16.5+ Million of all Calibers.

@@cryptarisprotocol1872 where did the Pentagon state that number? Where did you read it or watch it?

if the russian mod is correct about the increase then Russia made 1.2 million rounds a year for like 14 years so they hypothetically should have like 12m in stock but at the start of the war they were using 50-100k rounds per day

@@aotmoments7410 well those numbers are much lower currently, for comparison tho Ukraine uses about 10k rounds peer day wich Is why I said that, and also you still have to consider old soviet stocks and the fact that guided bombs also partially replaced artillery.

@@user-uz3jp7fe1o ukraine barely used 10k per day during summer offensive. they are down to 2 to maybe 3k a day now. they often dont even shoot at russian tanks any more. seen blyatmobil just driving around like nothing?

@@jebise1126 dam didnt know it was that bad for the Ukrainian side, well if this is true then it would only show even more how russia wont run out of artillery.

Depends how many pieces of artillery equipment get blown up…

@@Taskandpurpose Well you've now grown up to be a wonderful and special man.

They work even better when you take the lens caps off

We have crazy stockpiles we good

@@skinjudge9007Wouldn't it have been wise to give more to Ukraine then?

Exactly because they fire 60k shell a day last year

@@glintongordon6811 there is indeed a 6-day working week in Russia, but only because of the holidays. This is the first time I've heard that we're working on 6/1

@@pshh-pshh Военные фабрики работают без выходных на самом деле, просто сменный график

they will not modernize most of the ships for "mini sun" reasons cant fry mechanical stuff, plus who wants a car dealership being launched at you lmao fat electrician, hopefully they add some of the sparky bois make them things travel at like 7,000+ FPS mmmmmm general atomics best not eff it up

True. While fighting third world countries with limited ability to destroy those things it's the way to go. In a long drawn out war of superpowers where those very expensive slow to produced resources start vanishing quickly........you're in a different ball game. Not to mention air power is great for blowing things up but you MUST occupy ground to control it. Air power doesn't do that.

Our Marine artillery unit took us less than 20 days to get to Saudi. Were sent to the Kuwaiti border as a delaying force in case the Iraqis decided to cross and head towards Ryiad.

You wouldn't have any resistance anyway. You waited for the war between Iraq and Iran to end, which took away all the strength of the first and second. You did the same thing in World War II. They waited until the Russians defeated the Germans. This is the eternal Anglo-Saxon-Zionist policy.

This right here. We don’t have the human capability we used to.

That's why God invented the BM-21 divisional artillery battalion.

This is both budget and mobile strategy, and it's also strategy for preserving the lives of soldiers.

@@avadhutagita3741 it the weapon for those who can't control the air.

​@@rushyscoper1651 the only reason NATO control the air is they fight the country with minimum air defence capability

@@adillakandi.r The reason Russians can’t control the air is they are fighting without significant numbers of stealth aircraft and without any real SEAD capability.

Its America looking for war against China and Russia.

Russia isn't what is used to be. The birth rate back in the 90's and early 00's was cataclysmic. The Philippines has more military-age manpower than Russia these days. That being said, Russia is focusing on war-oriented things in a war situation whereas the EU really isn't. Russia can punch way above their weight when they're spending 6% of their GDP on as much OK stuff as they can make to use vs. their peer competitors spending 2% on gold-plated stuff they're afraid to lose.

​@@Veylon Very useful points to bear in mind. To split a small hair though, That of the Philippines having more military age men - but numbers are surely not that good an indicator of a country's ability to prosecute a meaningful conventional war. Russia has been attacked by the west time over since the fall of the awful czarists. Each time Russia has responded in a sustained and meaningful way. It has a disciplined population which is readily militarised. How effectively could the Philippines dragoon its people into intensive arms production, conscription and build a large effective military capable of fighting overseas if necessary. I suggest thats improbable and even if the attempt were made it would be because of pressure from its "allies" and massive aid from the US.

Russia has low cost labour with no worries about health and safety or net zero laws.​@@Veylon

@@Veylonmanpower doesn’t change anything. Just look at China and Japan’s. Still Japan beat China the whole war.