How The Next Batteries Will Change the World
Переглядів 1,065,132
3 роки томуSilicon Valley is about to commercialize revolutionary technology that will enable huge breakthroughs in the battle against global warming.
#TheSpark #BloombergQuicktake #Green
--------
Like this video? Subscribe: ukposts.info?sub_...
Become a Quicktake Member for exclusive perks: ukposts.infojoin
QuickTake Originals is Bloomberg's official premium video channel. We bring you insights and analysis from business, science, and technology experts who are shaping our future. We’re home to Hello World, Giant Leap, Storylines, and the series powering CityLab, Bloomberg Businessweek, Bloomberg Green, and much more.
Subscribe for business news, but not as you've known it: exclusive interviews, fascinating profiles, data-driven analysis, and the latest in tech innovation from around the world.
Visit our partner channel QuickTake News for breaking global news and insight in an instant.
@business 3 роки тому
We have some exciting news! We’re launching channel Memberships for just $0.99 a month. You’ll get access to members-only posts and videos, live Q&As with Bloomberg reporters, business trivia, badges, emojis and more. Join us: ukposts.infojoin
@lastking235 3 роки тому
Get rid of the word Quicktake. Makes one feel that the reporting is rushed. Just "Bloomberg" would be fine I think.
@zodiacfml 3 роки тому
feels like a video by small youtubers, more than 10 minutes and plenty introduction and explanation to battery basics
@st4ble869 3 роки тому
0.75 Volts to be precise
@djvdj 3 роки тому
I’m sorry but humans didn’t invent electricity ⚡️ ...lol
@Bakumatsu1 3 роки тому
@@lastking235 It is rushed, they're just being honest because they realize we can tell and it's a convenient excuse for them to use to explain the lower quality
@alholic 3 роки тому
It'll be a sad day for movies in the future when cars shot in fuel tank will never explode anymore.
@georgerobert2432 3 роки тому
You are so funny
@aakashshekhawat 3 роки тому
You are so funny my kidney shift to my leg
@scoobydicky9459 3 роки тому
yes. so sad.
@2kewl4uu 3 роки тому
Lithium batteries can explode too
@spideywhiplash 3 роки тому
You made me chuckle.😄
@AgentSmith911 3 роки тому
"new amazing battery coming soon" - I've heard this for years now lol
@jeffbac1889 3 роки тому
Because it's true, almost every year we significantly improve our batteries. Look at batteries of cellphones back in the 2000s, barely powered tiny gray screens, now batteries can power little computers with 6' 1080p touch screens than can do almost anything you could need for more than 24 hours of fair use.
@VisualBliss. 3 роки тому
@@jeffbac1889 except early Nokias, they had the most advanced batterys in the universe!
@ameliabuns4058 3 роки тому
@@jeffbac1889 I haven't seen a new tech be available anywhere in years. The only place I've ever seen any battery become a reality is the realgraphene powerbank and in some RC battery packs
@DacLMK 3 роки тому
@@VisualBliss. I disagree. Couple of years ago my uncle gave me his old Nokia 3310 and 5110, and the original batteries of both devices could barely last 10 minutes. I agree that the later Li-Ion batteries did last long (I had a Nokia X2-00 which lasted me almost a week, and my father's basic Nokia X1-01 could last for two weeks with normal usage, even today after 10 years), but the old Ni-Mh batteries were horrible.
@rogerramjet6134 3 роки тому
And it has been happening for decades. Both solar panels and batteries have been declining in price exponentially for 70 years, and show no indications that they will or must slow in the next 20.
@organizedchaos4559 3 роки тому
I’m coming back in 5 years to see who actually revolutionize the industry
@riantidownload4044 3 роки тому
See you again in March 2026
@axelfoley1812 3 роки тому
👍🤔👍
@lukestimson6604 3 роки тому
Quantumscape will be it
@Levitiy 3 роки тому
Battery technology is not the silicon semiconductor. So, the question isn't who, but how could it?
@hman0121 3 роки тому
@@hammerhand5059 you're a time traveller?? 😂
@DerekWelchElectric 3 роки тому
Electricity wasn't invented, it was discovered.
@indian-tech-support 3 роки тому
True it's always been there just never used
@FSXgta 3 роки тому
@@indian-tech-support well your nerve system and brain use electricity. So more like we use it without knowing
@vtr279 3 роки тому
@@FSXgta Interesting comments! Makes a person wonder what else - exactly - is occurring unbeknownst to us at this time.
@indian-tech-support 3 роки тому
@@FSXgta as i said its always been here
@FSXgta 3 роки тому
@@indian-tech-support well then I misunderstood what you meant by "never used" 😅
@thetntsheep4075 3 роки тому
They have to be recyclable as well.
@5DNRG 3 роки тому
Thank you! 👍👍👍
@yzrippin 3 роки тому
Everything decays eventually be patient
@thetntsheep4075 3 роки тому
@@yzrippin Without battery recycling we will probably run out of lithium/other rare metals that are vital for battery production very quickly. Even if we don't, the mining would cause immense damage to the environment.
@Naiuhz 3 роки тому
@@yzrippin Yes but if it takes thousands to tens of thousands of years to decay, we quickly out produce the rate it takes to decay.
@yzrippin 3 роки тому
@@thetntsheep4075 The mining for the minerals is Completely localised and impact can be mitigated your right recycling is important however your missing the point of Off Earth mining
@spacewalker9375 3 роки тому
Yep. I took an energy storage course back in college and there are literally so many little things that can alter the performance of the battery and tons of materials research out there done to help change batteries. It's trying to find the best combo and how to deal with its advantages and disadvantages. Batteries still has a long way to go
@gig2734 3 роки тому
It should be changed from "it is not rocket science" to "it is not battery science".
@BillAnt 3 роки тому
Indeed battery storage is lacking behind computing technology, mainly due to the lack of need for high energy density batteries till the recent explosion of EV's. Up until recently small batteries worked fine in phone and laptops, but now we need large storage capacities in a relatively small space. I believe that the solution is not in chemical batteries, rather in Super-Capacitors which pick up the charge electrostatically. It has several advantages: 1. There's no chemical to degrade over the time. 2. It charges extremely fast, within minutes if not seconds. 3. It has a high energy density. There are several companies exploring this technology.
@sihotech 3 роки тому
@@BillAnt I read about graphene battery, they say it'll be revolutionary... they probably say that about every new battery tech.
@BillAnt 3 роки тому
@@sihotech < Well, like with any new technology there's lots of trial and error, some will fail while others succeed. Regardless of the technology used, the aim should be a high density and affordable battery which stores and equal or higher amount of energy than the current gasoline based fuels. Consumers will always go for the lowest cost and most convenient products, that's just how it has always been.
@Itsudemo1 3 роки тому
@@sihotech graphene in lipos exist, you can buy them but there's not much difference in performance
@CuriousAndCuriouser1865 3 роки тому
"We've made a partnership with Volkswagen in 2012 to make a joint venture to commercialize the cell and go into manufacturing together." That was 9 years ago tho....
@abisek.e7636 3 роки тому
yep, sad
@ExternalInputs 3 роки тому
@@abisek.e7636It should be ovious that if it was an easy process, it would have been achieved, or one of the many other companies also working on this would have gotten to market.
@abisek.e7636 3 роки тому
@@ExternalInputs yeah of course.. but we also should see the time going on
@luckyadeloye3452 3 роки тому
But what have you invented? All these things take time to perfect them!!!
@abisek.e7636 3 роки тому
@@luckyadeloye3452 can you pls chill? Did I told any outrageous response? I just told that time is going on and what that means is we should invest more in which really matters, better research next time Mr
@chrissscottt 3 роки тому
Too light on details which is so common in battery reports.
@Rysander1 3 роки тому
So go read the source material?
@demonitized6208 3 роки тому
Well they can’t just give away the recipe of the pancake right?
@GrandPrixDecals 3 роки тому
@@demonitized6208 here’s the recipe - oil from snakes
@pradumnjoshi 3 роки тому
I was about to say the same, I don't see any technical specification that would make me excited. Just like Nuclear fusion battery tech has been 5-10 years away. I am not saying there are no innovations but they have been often incremental and evolutionary certainly not revolutionary. It's just poor journalism, as far as tech is concerned the quality of journalism has been very poor from Bloomberg.
@guerillachan20 3 роки тому
fisker already dropped out of solid state market. The last 10% is very hard to overcome.
@user-hh2is9kg9j 3 роки тому
I have been hearing this for 15 years.
@bozo5632 3 роки тому
And batteries have become dramatically cheaper and more capable in those 15 years.
@shorb2289 3 роки тому
@@bozo5632 no they haven't
@Brandon_letsgo 3 роки тому
@@shorb2289 That's right. We're so far away from the ideia of the "perfect battery". Los Angeles Police Department did lease a bunch of EV and the record shows that they're useless. Officers do not wanna drive them. So they're parked. Some clerks are using them for personal driving. A woman that was caught at a nail saloon driving one of these EV ended up fired.
@YTStopCensoringFreedomOfspeech 3 роки тому
@@Brandon_letsgo Those 2015 LAPD EV's were BMW i3's which only had the 22-kWh battery pack that produced 81 miles of range. Of course they weren't gonna be used. The 2021 Tesla Model 3 has a range of 263 miles. And newer electric cars are coming out soon like the Lucid Air which will have 517 miles range. This technology is gonna keep improving and become cheaper. Everything demands it, smart phones, smart computers, electric vehicles, storage capacity for renewable energy, etc.
@halluminium 3 роки тому
@@shorb2289 shitty bait
@TeraAFK 3 роки тому
"Baghdad Battery. A 2,200-year-old clay jar found near Baghdad, Iraq, has been described as the oldest known electric battery in existence."
@antonsjoberg 3 роки тому
It's heavily disputed by some scientists though.
@harshbarj 3 роки тому
People are calling them batteries. But reality is they are not constructed in a way that actually make them batteries. Only one of the two conductors extended outside the "battery". So it's virtually a guarantee they were not batteries.
@jeffbenton6183 3 роки тому
@Craig Carmichael Except those tombs are much older than the battery. Ancient Egypt is *really* ancient. The "Baghdad battery" - if that's even what it was - was only slightly older than Julius Caesar. King Tut died over 1000 years before that. Construction of the Great Pyramids finished about 1000 years before that. The pyramids were as ancient to Cleopatra and Caesar as Cleopatra and Caesar are to us
@jaczekdertuerke 3 роки тому
@@jeffbenton6183 nicely put in perspective
@TheDennys21 2 роки тому
Oh please, they aren't even sure if that's a battery, it's probably not.
@QuestionEverythingButWHY 3 роки тому
“Necessity is the mother of invention.” ― Plato
@andrewjensen8189 3 роки тому
Your mom is the mother if you
@budg7525 3 роки тому
"We're only in it for the money!" -- Mothers of Invention
@jmuld1 3 роки тому
@@budg7525 If people don't want it, why built it?
@L.M1792 3 роки тому
Correct. This outdated economic structuring harms this planet and its inhabitants.
@nothing9220 3 роки тому
Passion and curiosity too...
@JoseGSada 3 роки тому
The battery recycling industry will experience monumental growth in the following years. Li-Cycle currently is at the verge of a global expansion to set up recycling centers. Interesting enough
@goranjosic 3 роки тому
As far as I understand, lithium is cheaper to recycle, if done the right way, than to take out a new one!
@tming28 3 роки тому
ABML will be huge!
@HernanValdes 3 роки тому
Quote: the best battery in nature is called glucose and is only rivaled by ATP
@aswingsharif6729 3 роки тому
Yes of course. Ask Neo, he had been visiting the Oracle and the Matrix.
@HernanValdes 3 роки тому
@@aswingsharif6729 XD of course I was joking man but do people realize how cool it is to take radiation from the sun and turn that energy into a sugar molecule? That's sick
@viperfang5291 3 роки тому
Mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell.
@ovadyarachman7243 3 роки тому
Actually there are more energy dense molecules than glucose and ATP that offer higher energy per volume, thermal effects, insulative effects, and hormonal effects.
@6Oko6Demona6 3 роки тому
Glucose is not a battery, it's a combustible source of energy. That's why it's so energy dense. But it is still a poor source of energy, fat is way better, it's 2.25 times more energy dense than glucose. It's easy to achieve high energy output from the source that is destroyed in the process (like fuel). But not so in the batteries. You can not expect batteries to be as energy dense as combustibles. That's why they're not going to be used on planes.
@MarlBobbins 3 роки тому
very interesting video, thank you! I think it´s important though to look at negative aspects of these new batteries aswell, for example the problematic extraction of lithium would probably become even worse if more of the battery was made with lithium. Not to say that these companies are bad, but it´s important to keep a complete view of the impacts of these kind of innovations.
@W123 3 роки тому
Inventing new technology of high efficiency batteries nowadays is like fighting with airdynamics how to fly an airplane back in 1900s, it seems to be hard, but understandable now
@tonycns 3 роки тому
I've been hearing about "new" batteries changing the world since 2015 and nothing has really changed yet
@jorgec30 3 роки тому
Plenty of scientists have been ahead of their time, and limited by the technology of their time. Id it say it sounds about time
@LuisRomeroLopez 3 роки тому
But that's just 6 years. For a reference, the first time I hear abou the concept of an e-book (like a Kindle) was in the early or middle 90s.
@henryeghaghara9385 3 роки тому
Tonycns you are so myopic Battery tech have advance significantly in last few years, if you can't see that you must be brain dead
@tonycns 3 роки тому
@@henryeghaghara9385 If you’re reading this, you’ve been in a coma for 10 years. We’re trying a new technique. We don’t know where this message will end up in your dream, but we’re hoping we got through. PLEASE WAKE UP!
@geo8626 3 роки тому
except your phone battery has double the capacity it used to have and charges four times as fast
@PompayKing123 3 роки тому
Am I the only one who got annoyed when they said petroleum energy and showed the huge amounts of steam from nuclear power plants as a way of showing pollution?
@ok0_0 3 роки тому
it's all anti-nuclear propaganda
@GrantSR 2 роки тому
They do that all the time. It's as if every video editor gets assigned the same library of images, and steam from cooling towers is the only image in their "pollution" B-roll folder.
@tristenlentz169 3 роки тому
The Baghdad Battery is believed to be about 2000 years old (from the Parthian period, roughly 250 BCE to CE 250). The jar was found in Khujut Rabu just outside Baghdad and is composed of a clay jar with a stopper made of asphalt. Sticking through the asphalt is an iron rod surrounded by a copper cylinder. (Before the 1700’s)
@Greg-TC 3 роки тому
The latest update that I heard on it was that scientists don’t think it would have worked and that it likely was not a battery. But hey, who knows
@jeffbenton6183 3 роки тому
Since we don't know if that even was a battery, it doesn't count. If it was if would've been *very* impractical. Enough to give you a somewhat uncomfortable shock, but not enough to do anything significant.
@fellowabhi 3 роки тому
Was expecting something of Graphene
@engravedhourglass8288 3 роки тому
Its too expensive..
@kawa1755 3 роки тому
Allot of new ideas none are doing well
@vishalkrsingh6184 2 роки тому
Power banks with graphene are already available
@candygirl6323 3 роки тому
I am pleased to see research/development making progress....with the increasing global warming events, we the world needs to change our traditional ways..
@cuddleheart5306 3 роки тому
The 'secret' substance for solid state batteries is graphene. This is going to change the game. Interestingly enough, the guy who helped discover solid state battery technology also helped invent lithium ion batteries and RAM.
@chris24hdez 3 роки тому
1:56 i always wondered where the Spanish term "pila" came from when referring to a "battery". However "battery" could also be considered as a description of plurality, such as a "battery of tests". Therefore a "battery" is a "bundle" of anions and cations.
@JonS 3 роки тому
Benjamin Franklin coined the term battery to describe a bank of capacitors (not electrochemical cells) that he was shown.
@gregvanpaassen 3 роки тому
A single cathode-separator-anode unit is called a cell. A battery (in the old, proper usage) is two or more cells like in the voltaic pile. A 12V lead-acid battery as seen in cars has six 2 volt cells chained in series. These days, even a single cell often gets called a battery in ordinary usage, like an 18650 Li-ion "battery".
@JonS 3 роки тому
@@gregvanpaassen I've given up trying to tell people that a single cell is not a battery!
@mcgruffsnuts305 3 роки тому
Very cool cutting edge information thank you !
@quosswimblik4489 2 роки тому
I just sort of have this picture of this micron sized webbed semi-sphere crystal which expands but not to much when its charging and contracts when it's discharging. So it needs to chemically bond when its releasing energy and separate and artificially bond to different strands in the crystal during charge. I was thinking of doing this with some sort of aluminium sulphide setup. 600-1000 Mah to the gram Is kinda significantly cheaper cars sort of territory.
@-fuk57 3 роки тому
“Quote. Quote, quote, quote.” -Quoted.
@goldrake821 3 роки тому
"“Quote. Quote, quote, quote.” -Quoted." -Quoted quote.
@-fuk57 3 роки тому
@@goldrake821 Hashtag: True.
@kodo1232 3 роки тому
OK
@nathanielmcdonald1910 3 роки тому
@@goldrake821 deep
@user-wk2gi5cp9y 3 роки тому
Ok
@superkasanova1979 3 роки тому
Turning 42 this year and I bought 3 shares of stock in Quantum Space (QS) this year. It is the first stock I ever bought. I believe in what they are doing and the CEO has the right vision to lead the company. Once scaled, these will be the most in-demand batteries out there.
@PlanktoniusRex 3 роки тому
Terrible way to invest.
@johnrankie4004 2 роки тому
QS goal for the year was to have four cells, they reported they were able to stack ten cells 8/21, your shares in QS are very volatile; but IMO, a great investment, add when able.
@Handyman247llc 2 роки тому
I look forward to see where the new technology takes us and how it will impact out world environmentally and our world adaptive nature.
@alimfuzzy 3 роки тому
For large scale energy storage the safer, more reliable long-term choice is Vanadium redox flow batteries (VRFB). It's an all liquid battery which doesn't catch fire. It's used for large scale renewable energy storage but one day may be reduced in size.
@King.Mark. 3 роки тому
"QUOTE " we don't even know where fish fingers come from " ~ the fish
@paulferris8180 3 роки тому
Hoki and they nearly wiped them out.
@thedudefromrobloxx 3 роки тому
?
@CraigDavies. 3 роки тому
I built an electric bike in 2016 the ebike forums said the price of batteries would go down every year. I can't get a cheaper battery today.
@Psilocybism 3 роки тому
Oh they are cheaper alright... To produce... Just not for you
@PlanktoniusRex 3 роки тому
And to think: a random group on the internet was wrong. The horror.....
@GoTeamScotch 3 роки тому
I'm excited about a bigger focus on cleaning up our energy systems, but I cant help but wonder about the cost of these clean solutions. The mine where the metals were sourced from. The gas powered trucks and trains that transported the materials around. The lights the workers used to see while working, which may be powered by a nearby coal plant. Dont get me wrong, I'm all for a cleaner future. But it's hard for me to get excited about clean solutions that require a ton of energy and materials to create... which produce a lot of greenhouse gasses and waste in the process.
@gig2734 3 роки тому
It will go the same way as it did for Tesla: In the beginning, they produce for a small market, and from year to year they try to expand production.
@ciocki 3 роки тому
How do we make the energy that charges the batteries?
@misruler9370 3 роки тому
With all do respect. Electricity was a discovery and not an invention. It is a common mistake to speak of invention and discovery as being the same. This does not take away from the meaning of the video as it is very informative and well-done.
@AscendtionArc 2 роки тому
Thank you for this video.
@NickRoman 3 роки тому
I saw a video a couple years ago that seemed to be talking about this same battery. I don't remember the company. But they were talking more about cell phone batteries and how this new kind is safer and won't catch fire. The guy charged up the battery and drove a nail through it and nothing happened, unlike lithium ion that would burst into flames.
@glennalexon1530 3 роки тому
Enovix is trying to make a minor change to lithium ion batteries? This video should be called "A long-wined ad for one of dozens of companies working on anodes".
@pw7225 3 роки тому
Stellar summary. Well done, Bloomberg.
@Junyo 3 роки тому
Summary? These are the same "fake promises" we've seen hundreds of times in the past 30 years. This item is Bloomberg showing the World they only employ high-schoolers who are still surprised by press-releases the older generations have already seen so many times before (and there are more than a few lies in this item as well to keep the share-holders happy).
@skylarkesselring6075 3 роки тому
@@Junyo bloomberg is always super light on details heavy on narrative. As in, they don't really produce compelling news, they mostly just give brief summaries on topics and give them an editorial flare to keep attention.
@ascen_dent7295 3 роки тому
Thanks ☺️
@joshuahuver8554 2 роки тому
Have you tried to compress it with transistor structures and a cuircuitt
@moodtherapist 3 роки тому
Interesting but a shame you missed the biggest step change in battery technology which is the use of graphene. A company called Gnanomat in Spain has some seriously mind blowing improvements under development.
@youngadventuresaustralia952 3 роки тому
Couldn't find the share price online whats the share code mate?
@lonibytyqi6093 3 роки тому
@@youngadventuresaustralia952 They are private.
@tuut1241 3 роки тому
How about the "Baghdad Battery"? It was certainly around way before Volta made his discovery.
@ME-uk8oi 2 роки тому
Very Informative
@larcomj 3 роки тому
In the battery industry a break through happens every couple of years, the science is hard but, bringing a battery to market is MUCH harder. youll be lucky to see this new tech with in a decade.
@purushottam_paramdharma 3 роки тому
why is that? wouldn't big companies profit, with state-of-the-art cheaper batteries? it will help them be above the competition
@Simon-dm8zv 3 роки тому
@@purushottam_paramdharma 1. Shortage in mining capacity of materials (mainly nickel). 2. Engineering the machines that can produce new battery tech in large amounts efficient and fast enough.
@nagitoyup6929 3 роки тому
Batteries are very old. But fundamentals never changed. We need completely new form of energy storage.
@tejarshihardas8707 3 роки тому
What about the carbon footprint of manufacturing the battery itself? Metal mining, especially lithium, is insanely nature intensive.
@user-fy1hp5qi4u 3 роки тому
That's what I was thinking bhai 👍
@sufferr2914 3 роки тому
didn't they explain in the video that lithium is not actually used in the construction of the battery but instead refers to the actual lithium ion used to store energy?
@Simon-dm8zv 3 роки тому
Voor EVs total production emissions of the battery pack are at about 100 kg of CO2 per kWh. Not too bad and definitely worth it.
@Ghst-tl9ec 3 роки тому
Shhhhh, don't bring logic into the discussion. We are saving the Fk'n planet!!!!
@Ghst-tl9ec 3 роки тому
@@Simon-dm8zv And what charges the battery? You think covering the planet with windmills and solar panels has no environmental effects?
@sinfullv9411 3 роки тому
Didn't the Egyptian made the first primitive battery with clay jar, citrus and copper?
@JamieM20001996 3 роки тому
Technically that's a cell
@andreskerschen7460 3 роки тому
3:44 - Cool
@Kartik_Z8 3 роки тому
I love the way you represented this new thing...
@userisongrind2395 3 роки тому
This is the best video I have watched in years
@debr4265 2 роки тому
You watched only that video then
@Smith15447 3 роки тому
@Bloomberg Quicktake Look into Proton Technologies Canada and what they're currently doing in Saskatchewan. If, and it's a big IF, but if a green, economical, and abundant source of hydrogen became possible, even after consideration of efficiencies, lithium-ion batteries would need to improve energy density by 14x and reduce charge time by 85% to compete. This would be particularly true of industrial/commercial vehicles and equipment. Looks as though we'll still need kerosene for long-haul flights for the foreseeable future though.
@sidneyrago 3 роки тому
yeah but where we gonna storage the battery if they los it's power? or got old, or the car gets old etc
@higherlearning7418 3 роки тому
Ever heard of the "Baghdad battery"? This guy said the first battery was made 1799
@gerhardwagner8654 3 роки тому
Main stream doesn’t accept it , Ignorants !
@Shadow__133 3 роки тому
I was there, it leaked and sucked. Plus not many thing to use it with.
@kasmopaya2676 3 роки тому
The old Egypt's had it first.
@paulferris8180 3 роки тому
Yeah. I was scanning comments to see who else knew. Yet the light emitting device pictured by the ancient Egyptians remains unknown.
@paulferris8180 3 роки тому
@@gerhardwagner8654 what's not to except you can make one in 5 minutes, they're truly ignorant.
@freebie808 3 роки тому
The irony of wanting this is needing precious metals and rare earth minerals which are hard to mine.
@Ghst-tl9ec 3 роки тому
But, we savin' the planet....
@adambkehl 3 роки тому
He seemed so thrilled to light than LED up
@ravindertalwar553 2 роки тому
Congratulations 👏 and all the best for your success and happiness 💓
@reverendoz 3 роки тому
What about NDB (Nano Diamond Battery)?
@eagle___shadow 3 роки тому
👍
@suman-majhi 3 роки тому
what about graphene battery?
@AnimeHumanCoherence 3 роки тому
Meme technology that never leaves the lab. Scaling production of graphene is too expensive to make it worth the investment.
@yengsabio5315 3 роки тому
@@AnimeHumanCoherence That's what people say about photovoltaic solar panels way back in the 70s & 80s. So I say, let's wait & see.
@suman-majhi 3 роки тому
@@AnimeHumanCoherence yes... you are right... bt no one knows what is waiting for the future... back in 2005... no one thought nokia would be abolished
@AnimeHumanCoherence 3 роки тому
@@suman-majhi That is completely true, but we can't place our hopes in an unproven lab bench discovery. When an affordable process comes along that'll make graphene a useful material for these applications, than sure, make a product. But as of right now, and the past few years, it's simply just not viable to plan for it. There are many, many discoveries that promise the world that are also forgotten because they can't scale to fulfill those promises. Basically happens every year.
@jay-uo2bi 3 роки тому
@@AnimeHumanCoherence Pretty much all in development battery ideas/concepts are in the lab. The technology still has to be researched and doesn't just come out of thin air. The fact that its not in mass production absolutely does not mean it's a potentially viable idea.
@johnpaulminguito 3 роки тому
Go men, You can do it, I salute to all of the scientists, engineees, physicists etc.
@wardude7806 3 роки тому
Slim battery will need more charge. Imagine a battery charging itself from everything in every condition! Fantastic
@moriart13 3 роки тому
I've been hearing about "battery breakthrough" for like 5 years, and none of it is happening🆗
@Junyo 3 роки тому
Trust me...I've heard "battery breakthrough" for 30+ years and less than 0.1% has ever went to mass-production stage.
@moriart13 3 роки тому
@@Junyo going form Nicd to Lion was at least something
@Ghst-tl9ec 3 роки тому
They are making too much money to advance it quickly.
@FlorianKarmelk 3 роки тому
My battery died when i was watching this
@inspiregrow2336 3 роки тому
😂😂😂
@roshanthapa9321 3 роки тому
🤪🤪🤪🤪
@d947 3 роки тому
Ok xD
@nou4898 3 роки тому
cool
@FlorianKarmelk 3 роки тому
Wow i never had so many likes
@reving4896 Рік тому
thanks a lot
@BillAnt 3 роки тому
I believe that the solution is not in chemical batteries, rather in Super-Capacitors which pick up the charge electrostatically. It has several advantages: 1. There's no chemical to degrade over the time. 2. It charges extremely fast, within minutes if not seconds. 3. It has a high energy density. There are several companies exploring this technology.
@maiarosewatts3529 3 роки тому
soul energy
@jevontewatson7331 3 роки тому
great video
@krill_inksanity Рік тому
9:25 What is the name of this song?
@TheCaptainLulz 3 роки тому
Remember that more energy density can equal more fire and boom in case of an accident. Energy is conserved, so a fully charged battery shorting will be lethal. These are great for grid storage, but Id be reluctant to sit atop one in a car. And, the biggest challenge right now isnt capacity, its the number of chargers and charging time holding the tech back. EVs are already perfect for city travel, and there are tons of chargers in cities now. But traveling, say, from Sault St. Marie in Ontario to Thunder bay is still very difficult, and for trucks in particular, thats a game ender right now. Its much the same in the US, where travel up the west coast is very doable, but going cross country isnt, unless you want to stop after every 6 hours to plug into a wall overnight. Still, its progress.
@AnimeHumanCoherence 3 роки тому
Perhaps with the solid lithium battery, but he mentioned that they are unsafe in the video. Currently Tesla's are the safest vehicles on the road, despite the large battery packs.
@disposabull 3 роки тому
There is an alternative to batteries, high temperature super conducting cables. Super conducting materials by definition can transfer vast amounts of energy over vast distances with zero loss. That means you can generate power in the Sahara and then transmit it to Shanghai or San Francisco with zero energy loss. When it is night time in Alaska, it is peak solar generating capacity in the Sahara no batteries are required to store the energy because it just gets sent to the opposite side of the planet with no loss to be consumed.
@therighteous802 3 роки тому
It doesn't solve EVs though.
@disposabull 3 роки тому
@@therighteous802 Why do EV's need to be solved? They seem to be working just fine. The problem with renewables is that they are intermittent and unreliable so they require massive batteries on the grid to store energy when the sun isn't shining. The only alternative is to have a planet sized super conducting grid so you can consume energy on the opposite side of the planet.
@therighteous802 3 роки тому
@@disposabull I'm no expert and I don't have an EV, but I think energy density is the main thing to improve. It's also what could make electric planes happen. Charge time is another, although I guess we can swap batteries (but we would need to produce a lot more than necessary).
@ruttolomeo1987 3 роки тому
Italian Antonio Meucci: invents the phone. English-speaking world: we'll take it from here, thanks. Italian Eugenio Barsanti and Felice Matteucci: invent combustion engine. English-speaking world: we'll take it from here, thanks. Italian Enrico Fermi: discovers nuclear energy. English-speaking world: we'll take it from here, thanks. Italian Alessandro Volta: invents the battery. English-speaking world: we'll take it from here, thanks. Italy: Guys, we're running out of money here. The world: It's all your fault mafia pizza mamma boys, stop crying.
@renzoqu 3 роки тому
and we are here. 20 years later, learning things about batteries
@DigitalArtisan77 3 роки тому
Why would a mechanically expanding battery not work? Would the area change give too much resistance shift throughout the cycle?
@kerbatonbaton8108 3 роки тому
How long will this simple copper zinc battery last? How long will the LED shine?
@sumbirdy1741 3 роки тому
Likely hours at the most.
@Ddub1083 3 роки тому
Not nearly as long as it took to build it.
@leostgeorge2080 3 роки тому
As long as there is electrons to convert to photons.
@kpopempire1475 3 роки тому
What happened to the Goodenough solid-state battery everyone was hyping about last year?
@craigthebrute2409 3 роки тому
It was faked
@henriqueportelasantos9195 3 роки тому
@@craigthebrute2409 Just like these examples seem to be...
@DRTerabyte 3 роки тому
@@craigthebrute2409 Not true.
@craigthebrute2409 3 роки тому
@@DRTerabyte so where is it?
@DRTerabyte 3 роки тому
@@craigthebrute2409 wasn’t faked. It is still in testing, things don’t just appear it not goes through testing, feasibility and cost reduction.
@bananabread1480 3 роки тому
the thing that no one thinks about is silicon is a finite recourse that's used absolutely every where cant be recycled were going to run out of it eventually just like oil and gas which is estimated we only have 40 ish years left
@polizeitroisdorf1422 3 роки тому
Silicon also is one of the most abundant elements so it would also be relatively cheap I suppose
@GrantFerdinandsen 3 роки тому
I’m pretty sure the Tesla team announced during battery day that they’re starting to use silicon. Correct me if I’m wrong?
@kulio212 3 роки тому
Akira Yoshino invented the first safe lithium ion battery
@aussieausbourne1 2 роки тому
The voltaic pile was not the first time we generated electricity others not understanding the connection between electricity and magnetism had generated sparks by passing magnets between coiled copper and still others stored electricity in Leyden jars generated from glass rods and silk but yes the first source of continuous stable electricity was the pile.
@ConfirmedSource 2 роки тому
Solid Power Inc. already in the testing phases with BMW and Ford as partners.
@efone3553 3 роки тому
lets all hope this comes true but please do not hold your breath!
@horikatanifuji5038 3 роки тому
I don't think anyone can hold their breath that long.
@imperpekto12ify 3 роки тому
Dang!!! This is exciting!!!!
@brahmburgers 3 роки тому
I'm old enuf to recall when Prez Carter allocated mega dollars to the Big 3 US automakers - to develop better batteries for vehicles. The Big 3 took the Fed grants, but didn't deliver anything useful. Anywho, I liked this video very much. Thanks!
@abbayrai6340 3 роки тому
You guyz should also explore log9 materials
@JigilJigil 3 роки тому
Great video, but you missed some of the other noted companies such as Tesla, Sila Nanotechnologies,...
@shreyashkolhe7887 3 роки тому
So inshort they are trying to make a higher density battery
@mwanikimwaniki6801 3 роки тому
Yep
@skylarkesselring6075 3 роки тому
Yes, but also a lot of research goes into cheaper/longer lasting batteries as well. Tesla is investing heavily in cheaper/longer lasting but less dense (relatively speaking) batteries. This allows cheaper electric cars to be built and for long term energy storage where price and performance beat out size for many companies
@bxbank 2 роки тому
BYD seem to be making innovative batteries. Did you look at them? It is really important that battery designs can be recycled.
@acikacika 3 роки тому
Let's just hope there's no more wars over these new technology solutions
@mauricesupot6641 3 роки тому
America never goes down without a fight
@JogBird 3 роки тому
the silicon tech presented sounds increibly expensive to manufacture, w no margin for error
@user49917 3 роки тому
It might end up using more energy and natural resources than petroleum
@serenamente5192 3 роки тому
No it doesn't lmao
@ogc9649 3 роки тому
Like a chip lol
@sufferr2914 3 роки тому
@@serenamente5192 they were talking about imperfections on a microscopic level which means that it would need crazy high tolerances and that would be crazy expensive. remember this has to compete with your everyday double A battery. Telsa Cars use a mildly bigger double A looking battery
@serenamente5192 3 роки тому
@@sufferr2914 The tech is there for up to 2 nanometers. Microscopic level isn't much noteworthy
@risingmoon893 3 роки тому
Are they not gonna say how expensive these batteries will be cause of economics of scale and whatnot?
@risingmoon893 3 роки тому
@ROM LUNDY I know, and how is that relevant?
@Vision_Voyagers 3 роки тому
I haven't read an article about the gold batteries, which have lower degrading life, can hold backup for much longer like months. The problem is people are hoarding gold which makes it very expensive.
@niggacockball7995 3 роки тому
Its goverments holding most of the gold
@ajdesmond9545 2 роки тому
The thing is they’ve had this in the bag for years probably decades But didn’t use it went with other methods instead like lithium batteries
@timhaigh2484 3 роки тому
This was interesting. But once again this “green” video on batteries only discussed use improvements (no gaseous emissions) and failed to talk about disposal, repairability, or recyclability of any or all of the components of the subject batteries. Batteries are going to be the plastic of the next age: a blight on the landscape unless we design for disposal (grave).
@shaneintegra 3 роки тому
I wish I was younger so I could witness what's to come
@neilknightley4703 3 роки тому
How old are u ?
@purushottam_paramdharma 3 роки тому
damn man, don't make me sad
@laurenz1337_ 3 роки тому
I think you'll live for 5 more years lmao
@JonS 3 роки тому
You are younger than you will be! And if you were younger you’d have missed all the things you did get to see introduced in your lifetime. If you were born tomorrow, at some point you’d still be bemoaning the same thing. “I wish I was younger so I could witness the teleporter that’s to come”. In a world of continuous change, there’s no place to get to.
@whyamiwastingmytimeonthis 3 роки тому
take proactive care of your health, vote for those that support drastic medical research funding increases, research/invest/donate to longevity biotech causes if you can
@texastexas4541 Рік тому
Is the negative terminal at low potential compared to positive terminal? If so, how would electrons move from low to high potential? Everyone uses water tank analogy to tell us that things move from high to low potential.
@bradcole2015 3 роки тому
The material they are using as a conductor in the pouches is graphene at a guess
@TheAstronomyDude 3 роки тому
Quantum scape is a scam. They're literally repackaging another company's solid state batteries. It's why they don't have any patents. You can buy those lithium metal paper thin batteries on eBay and they work! Their energy density is garbage though.
@clarencetse 3 роки тому
butthurt bagholder detected
@macd1327 3 роки тому
Lol
@SerpentInside 3 роки тому
Got the same impression. Theranos II.
@skylineXpert 3 роки тому
As long as the PRC gets kept out of this then...
@8traceur90 3 роки тому
Scared ?
@henkterbeest4938 3 роки тому
Might be a dumb question, but at the start of the video you guys made a battery. The 10stacked layer of zinc, coffeefilter and copper that made energy. With that you could power a led. So where does this energy come from? It looks like the greenest solution to produce energy (maybe technically a “little more” developed then haha). A 4 layer composite that produces energy on its own.
@kurenai5000 Рік тому
The power from the voltaic pile comes from the "voltage differential" from the two metals. Essentially one metal is negative and the other is positive. You can look up a list online to see. Minerals and metals naturally conduct energy and a charge so combining them together in electrolyte like the salt water they used lets their power flow and be usable. Or if you want a more occultic answer the power comes from "space".
Вадим Шегалов.Оккультные игры элиты
Переглядів 33 тис.
Notebook1 Ассоциация сервисных центров
Переглядів 61 тис.