A local chap to me, invented a new battery or the way it worked that would revolutionize electric cars, he was so frightened he would get suicided he sold the patent fast as he could.

@@myself6296 Shouldn’t have sold it, just kept it hidden, but I don’t blame him. Most do get offed if they come out too the public with it. That’s why you don’t tell anyone if you do infact figure something out. Or build a small group or order that is only aware of such technology. That’s how others have seemed too hide there’s.

There's an even simpler reason - people settle into what appears to work and are resistant to betting on something new and better.

​@@myself6296 I would have been just as concerned as he was about the same thing. That sucks.

TRUTH.

If I had a nickel cadmium for every time I had dead batteries....

@@newfreenayshaun6651 I wouldn't want to have a NiCad every time I had dead batteries. I'd end up with a toxic landfill before I can even get married.

Whether it's one year or twenty years from now, eventually we'll have a new battery technology with higher density, more cycles and at a lower cost (even just greatly improving 1 or 2 of them would be great). Lithium ion/lithium polymer surely isn't as good as possible.

Those of us who are over 35 (ish) already have. Nobody was using Li-ion batteries when I was a kid, and all of the electronic devices that define the modern world simply wouldn't be practical using the battery technology of that era.

Ok, Malcolm in the Middle with a mustache, this better be something significant.

It's called planned obsolescence

Same with many things, such and domestic appliances

The same with LED lights too.

Something to consider is that, like LED bulbs, how hard you drive a incandescent bulb has a huge effect on it's lifespan. Unlike LED bulbs though, a incandescent lightbulb has the highest chance of failure when you turn it on (likely due to thermal shock on the filament) which means that if you run a incandescent light bulb 24/7 then it has a much lower chance of failure compared to one that is turned on and off constantly. If you run that bulb that is running 24/7 at a fraction of it's rated power then you also vastly increase it's lifespan. In other words, if you look at photos of that fire station bulb you will notice that it is extremely dim which means that it is running at a fraction of the power that a regular bulb would be running at and it has been running pretty much 24/7 in that low power state which avoids both conditions that lead to failure.

I have a halogen bulb in my hallway that's lasted over 30 years

How the fuck did the UK manage to dominate and control 25% of the planet at one point? Every story i hear out of the UK nowadays is about the government oppressing the people and the people just shrugging their shoulders in response...where did the killer fighter Briton go?

Build your own unless you live in a kennel 😊

@@ReedoAcedoesn’t work that way. Also not an easy task that everyone can just do

I could say there are no chimneys because the Illuminati cabal don’t believe in Santa, but I’d be wrong.

Electricity prices through the roof in Australia and going to be worst year on year too… green is cheap hahaha 😂

Same with nuclear fusion, and thorium reactors.

Dont worry, a big company will patent this revolutionary battery, so it never will go into production.

😂😂😂 so true..

Compare batteries now to 30 years ago. Pretty sure it's been a gamechanger for a while now.

Just like fusion power. It will never happen either.

And it would be impossible for an enemy to cut power to great swaths of territories

Local stationary energy storage for sustainable energy systems doesn't require high energy density though, which is the expensive part and also the very dangerous part. For bulk stationary storage the only requirement is that it's very cheap per unit of storage and can operate at part-charge without damage. Unfortunately, lead-acids don't fit the bill because even though they're relatively cheap and very safe, they get damaged unless maintained at 100% charge. Nickel-based chemistries are too expensive, lithium-ion is far too dangerous in large aircraft-hangar sized installations and tends to be very expensive as well. Perhaps LFP (lithium ferrophosphate) cells would be a good intermediate solution for local bulk storage but they are still far too expensive. Their cycle life and calendar life are outstanding, though. For large cities like Toronto, Montreal, NYC, L.A. and the like, having huge local battery storage systems might be a really good idea to relieve power stations from conditions of peak demand. It's just that battery technology is too dangerous and much too expensive right now. The highest possible energy density is only necessary for EVs, and is especially necessary for electric aircraft. The best current battery tech is much too dangerous and expensive, so even the best EVs are a very costly niche product and likely will remain so for many decades. They can get away with it for relatively small numbers of very expensive luxury & performance oriented vehicles, but EV still have no way to compete with internal combustion engines for low cost and high practicality & convenience. Long-range low-cost practical air travel entirely on green energy is a dream for the future--and an actual goal for the *distant* future.

@@devilsoffspring5519 I don't believe truly "cheap" energy will ever happen. It might be cheap to produce BUT it wont be cheap for the consumer, as with everything else.

@@starbyray7828 It has already happened. Off-peak electricity is roughly 10 cents a kWh, around 100 bucks a meg. Portable energy for vehicles (gasoline) is about twice that cost for the same amount of energy. That's really, really cheap. We may think of it as expensive because it's so common and so cheap that we use it frivolously. What's not cheap is practical, sustainable energy. The normal sources like oil-derived fuels for mobile applications and hydro, nuclear and natural gas for stationary energy are extremely cheap.

@@starbyray7828 Well you produce part of it yourself or within a small community, which makes it difficult to force you to pay high prices. Big corporations are what makes stuff expensive, because the force the price up, if you break their monopole, the prices will fall.

Do you have a time Like once a month when you drain the batteries to 10% to make sure they stay good? Not sure what your batteries are made of but most batteries will go bad if you keep them charged all the time.

​@@ebenezerspludge8369 The batteries manages themselves to keep them healthy. Every now and again they do get depleted. But never to 10%. My lower limit is 40%. The batteries themselves are rated for 6000 cycles at 100% depth of discharge or 15 years before it starts derating. With a 10 year warranty. It is LiFePO4 automotive grade batteries.

Yes. I'm legally blind (not fully blind) and would love to have a bionic eye to improve my vision. But it would be a nightmare to have to "recharge my eyes" every 5 hours.

@@thecaricature Interesting idea, but it probably is extremely unsafe. I would get a steady dose of radiation all day, every day, straight to my head.

​@@chunkyMunky329 The worst you'd have to deal with is heat radiation generated from the wireless power transfer and some kind of device strapped to your head. Considering how thin wireless charging elements are/ can be and the amount of power you'd have to transmit, you could probably get away with an ear piece of some sort. But bar that, you'd be fine. However, transmitting enough power to power say, a car? You're talking a lot of non-ionizing radiation similar to a cell tower, but wayyyy more intense

would be better if batteries were made obsolete ;)

@@jimmybrad156 Hell yeah, bring on magic and pixie dust!

Bullshit, what matters is if it's profitable for the 1%.

Given enough time a craze can drive new premium products and investment.

Is it that or the current battery companies hindering new cheaper and better technologies to come to the masses because it doesn't generate them enough money. You'd be naive to think we don't have better technologies that are cheaper , better and easy to produce already. Problem is they only keep them as secret until they find a way to capitalize it

if any company discovers a new, revolutionary type of battery, it will be so expensive that nobody can afford it anyway

​​​@@Moonlakes oh okay. Thanks for the information! Edit nice pfp

a patent can be bought and buried, but only for 16 years. @@TimeLessTraveled

R&D with carbon tax money. In 2012 the Korean presidents brother, who worked for ExxonMobil his entire life, took over the International Panel of Climate Change at the UN.. ExxonMobil is the world leader in green technologies

theres a crystal growing, layering, pressing, tech tool the universities & others have. Inputting as little as a watch battery amount of energy to it produces more then a semi battery worth of output. Light can be used to input a slight amount of energy to the crystal tech as well

Patents only last 20 years

@@adjacent-smithand in the news is the fact that ExxonMobil is rolling out lithium extraction from underground brines in the USA.

If they have truly given up I hope they find a way to get the knowledge out to people. It's better that the more efficient tech is known even if they can't make money from it

They should not give up. Especially not for cowards who are afraid of looking stupid.

Screw patents. Just put it out. Patents only work for trolls and corporations who can afford to sue large companies... If you can't.. Then patents are pointless. Just gives everyone who's rich clear instructions on how to undercut you.

Yeah. I imagine some rich guys going: NO, WE DON'T WANT TO MAKE MONEY WITH THIS NEW TECHNOLOGY! SHUT IT DOWN. Dude. Please.

you gotta make them dude!

Currently it's being forced to exist at gunpoint by my state government. The "big oil" companies are pushing these renewables and there is no competition because, well, the government is forcing it on us.

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL NEW TECH? xD This battery was at the drawing board since the 1960s and they had the same problems as we do now. Directly quoted from the wiki. Li-S batteries were invented in the 1960s, when Herbert and Ulam patented a primary battery employing lithium or lithium alloys as anodic material, sulfur as cathodic material and an electrolyte composed of aliphatic saturated amines.[12][13] A few years later the technology was improved by the introduction of organic solvents as PC, DMSO and DMF yielding a 2.35-2.5 V battery.[14] By the end of the 1980s a rechargeable Li-S battery was demonstrated employing ethers, in particular DOL, as the electrolyte solvent.[15][16] In 2020 Manthiram identified the critical parameters needed for achieving commercial acceptance.[17][18] Specifically, Li-S batteries need to achieve a sulfur loading of >5 mg cm−2, a carbon content of

OK, I grant its right to exist. Waiting...

They'll never let it

Conspiracies are so handy to mask unrealized dreams ... dreams that don't take into account real world physics ... so so handy

One of the very few times there has actually been a secret conspiracy like some folks like to yell about. Funny how the tinfoil hat crowd does not seem to know about it...

Light bulbs, assuming you’re talking about the incandescent kind, like many things, involve a tradeoff. In this case it’s a tradeoff between lifespan and efficiency. The most efficient lightbulb is the one which burns the hottest, but that also has the shortest life. Conversely, you can make a bulb which will last many years but it will be terribly inefficient. Incandescent lightbulbs have long been designed for a medium lifespan/efficiency. It has nothing to do with making money.

@@ethanlamoureux5306 You're talking form a technical view of how it functions, I'm not. I'm talking how these types of products were originally meant to be used, then were changed (be that for efficiency or profit) There's information out there about these things and their uses when first invented, how the products were changed largely because a company wouldn't make as much money.

@@ethanlamoureux5306 Nope, there already were designs with good lifespan/efficiency ratio, and then the different companies got together and agreed to lower the lifespan so they could sell more and also that anyone whose product was too good would have to pay fines.

@@Martyn_Wolf except the as you put it technical point of view makes it so that the thing you're talking about isn't nearly as cut and dry as you'd like to believe. There were genuine technical reasons to limit lightbulb lifespan. Efficiency is one factor, another is light temperature and finally there is luminosity. Back to efficiency and lifespan, if our light bulbs were less efficient, but longer lasting that would have put more strain on electric grids. I remember reading an analysis according to which it would have been more expensive for consumers to have longer lasting lightbulbs due to the increased electricity usage and costs thereof.

But then Power companies wouldn't be able to sell you overpriced power.

No, no they didn't.

🧢

Stop making shit up brother.

Are you from the future? No, really giving you the benefit of the doubt. Do you know anything else about it?

WHAT ??? THATS ALL U EVER HEAR !!!

Glad I live where I dont have to ask permission

That's wild. We send our excess back. With how frequent the threat of black outs are you'd think they'd welcome it.

Weird, where im at it's basically opposite of that, you have to agree to maintain a grid connection and add your excess back into the supply.

@@TheCoon1975 Yeah, that's kind of what I traditionally thought too. I had no idea some regions had to deal with this. DTE Energy is where we live, and they call the shots for us. :/

You at least still have "free" electricity, you just don't get to profit off it. Lame, but it's better than getting gouged when relying on the grid.

So much more wrong with this video, but this is a good start.

@@chickenman297 It wasn't a bad overview of the problems with batteries in general. Aram didn't not specific issues each type of battery as they weren't relevant to the video, batteries are probably at the limit of what we can do with them and new ones might come on to the market if they can solve some serious technical issues. Note his comment comparing them to fusion just being around the corner.

You too can learn to dance! Take a 9 volt and drop it in your pocket with change. Whoopie!

@@davidmacphee3549 A 9 volt? That can't break the resistance of the skin You need at LEAST 50V, and that is still on the very low. You can find some Ohm calculators to find out what you need to break through skin, which is roughly 10k to 100k ohm. Figuring out skin resistance to zap someone is actually a very good way of starting to understand Ohms law, everyone gets interested for some reason :)

EV batteries have just entered the chat.

Like the batteries and the solar panels and the inverters needed to power a 3-rd world village with people that make less than $5 / day? How are they going to pay for those? In that village surely they have biomass (as agricultural waste, wood, and other things that burn) which can be used in a wood gas generator which can power an conventional ICE generator and costs less than 1/10 of the price of the battery.

@@orionbetelgeuse1937 If those people have been surviving without electricity for thousands of years up until this point why exactly is it so important to drastically change their lives? So much of our interference in the underdeveloped world has only made things horribly worse for them and us. We have millions of people in Africa now dependant on charity food supplies from the West, now they are supposed to get Western medical care, and you want to give them electricity so they can stay up later at night making more babies? We need to stop trying to "save" people that are obviously content in their ways and stop making it easier for them to breed excessively which just creates higher demands for more charity from us. Leave them alone, your aid is just another form of colonialism and it's not helping them.

I foresee laws preventing independent energy production for "safety" reasons. Governing bodies are not losing control of a major resource nor are the industries going to sit back and twiddle thumbs. Someone will make and sell the solar panels and as they do now, lease them. Someone will make and sell the batteries charging for a maintenance plan to service issues, someone will need to make the lines you use to carry power into your house. As always government will pick winners in that war, incentivise them well making laws preventing others. However the vast majority of individuals don't want to become producers,they just want to flip a switch and be done so mist will be happy to pay somebody to handle it all.

@@susanlippy1009 That wouldn't be surprising in some places, I recently found out that in Oregon the state doesn't trust it's citizens to pump their own gas into their cars lol. You have to pay a "specialist" to place the nozzle in your tank and push the button so you don't destroy your car or the gas station with your obvious incompetence. Hilarious

California’s electric utility cartels slowed the adoption of solar by 80% last year to boost their profits and take more money from their captive customers.

Planned obsolescence.

No. If someone developed a new leap in battery technology to hold us over until Lithium Air comes around? They would be disgustingly rich. Remember it isn't just one company striving for it. It is literally countries. America, China, all of Western Europe are researching it for not just civilian, but military uses. Solid State is coming out in 2024. I'm really hoping more break throughs on lithium air can. Therotically they have the best maximum potential, and can be made to draw air from the environment making them hold up to 12.7kw kg. Anyway technology moves to rapidly for old companies to try to stagnant a technology so important to civilization. Governments would get involved.

The world of today isnt the same as 100 years ago where information traveled very slowly, if ever. It was a different time and opportunity to create artificial scarcity. Besides, its not really the battery manufacturer that is concerned but the current energy providers and the politicians on their payroll. It's why Biden wont acknowledge Tesla corp, but praise Gm and Ford as leaders of electrification when they barely sold a few thousand cars. Meanwhile tesla had about a million on the roads already. It's also why UAE pivot to invest in entertainment/sports because they see the writings on the wall. For decades, battery development was undermined, since the oil crisis of the 70's basically, when people thought of changing the whole thing. It was even recognized by governments. The whole thing could have been much further, but at last, it's finally happening

⁠@@dianapennepacker6854, that's like saying that cars that ran on batteries in 1890 weren't suppressed by car manufactures of the time (and for the century) while they were saying it was dangerous and ICE were the future of cars that run on batteries...

@@dianapennepacker6854 It is BECAUSE governments are involved. They need taxes income, which is difficult with cheap and long-lasting things.

says who? you know this how?

Are you an idiot?

Winners of wars write the history so all manipulated

It's a long list of things that have been "discovered" more than once throughout history. The United States was "discovered" at least 4 times. 1. Native Americans (descendants from asians). 2. Original South Americans 3. Vikings, 4. Europeans. Chinese could fold steel in a way we still can't figure out. Japanese used to build homes and buildings without any metal "screws"

I am more worries about lithium fires. They are quite fiery, enough to make sitting on a tank of flammable liquid look safe by comparison.

There are ppl who kill those projects because they will no longer hold the money, power, and influence they have now.

Lithium batteries are considered a hazardous material to ship, meaning shipping containers must be labeled showing that lithium batteries are present so that first responders know how to safely approach and deal with them in case of accidents and emergencies.

I've been there myself and it's always hard to break it to people who are still awstruck at the prospects of that magical sci-fi future that's apparently just years away. Real scientific progress is very slow and incremental, and most the papers out there are total deadends. Especially if they sound cool. The researchers see what they want to see and exaggerate to garner attention and funding. Journalists don't understand the subject matter and then exaggerate the smallest 'maybes' into headlines for clickbait. If 10% of the things I read about had come true, IRL Star Trek wouldn't be far away.

@@balazsvarga1823 Yep, cobalt batteries are a risk, so are LFP. Regardless of the chemistry, it's also a matter of energy density, as the battery isn't the only risk it also includes the electronics and wiring with shorts and you still have a fire...

interesting stuff

And the cost of diesel fuel for one super excavator is 6.5 million that’s just fuel no maintenance at all. That’s why they use slave labor. Remember that there is an estimated 40.3 million slaves today. Yet nobody cares. Sad but true 🙏🇺🇸

If you are talking of extracting lithium from rock deposits, then you are right, it takes at least five years to get a new mine into production. But high-lithium geothermal brines are being discovered in huge quantities in many countries (Salton Sea region in USA, Elsass in France, Cornwall in UK, etc), and those can be developed very quickly, as they involved no mining operation, just drilling + a lithium extraction plant, and have a minimal environmental footprint, so they can be developed within a densely populated region. The heat from the brines also allow the operation to generate its own energy, with a surplus! See: - www.energy.gov/eere/articles/us-department-energy-analysis-confirms-californias-salton-sea-region-be-rich-domestic - ukposts.info/have/v-deo/fpKrgGZwiqV5xaM.html

In the context of growing economic demand then scarcity is exactly the issue, right? Though I get what you mean with typical connotations of the word, and resource scarcity alone doesn't explain much as to why that is. With how quick tech and the world's demand moves, the mines can't keep up which leaves us with demand induced scarcity. Fast world we live in 😵‍💫

​@@mildjellisc Catch 22 New technology also takes time to come to market By which time the supply demands May have caught up. It's amazing how much technology is developing So many different Innovations flying around Seems like a new one every day.

Piss in your phone.

Using it wisely I'd watch thoyhty2 also

Put that shite on charge or u may miss something

Mine is at 69%

67%

10000000%% spot on !!!! Greed and corruption across the board

Could you name some of those broken through engineers?

I’d love to hear more about these engineers and inventors!!

​@@iiiiii19that's the point, you aren't allowed to know about them. Usually it's controlled in the following methods: 1.they buy off the competitor(the new threat to their profits) 2.adjust the regulations in order to make it severely harder to publicize their inventions 3.create drama and false narratives about new technologies to make the public not trust it 4. Dig up the past of the individuals in order to force them to stop or to start a legal battle hassle for the individual until they are financially bankrupt. 5.lastly is ending if the ones above don't work. Unless you have really really good connections that can back you up financially, you'll have a really difficult time releasing anything that could harm the profits of the monopolized industries

extrudable polymeric batteries are a good example, bought from Leeds university by an American company which then dropped off the radar, you don't need high density batteries for cars etc if you can make most of the car body a battery.

That and more.

"Well researched" the Baghdad battery is pure psudoscience. In fact it wanst even a battery in the furst place, and furthermore there is ZERO evidence it could have been used for electroplating as implied in the video.

Smart kid

Crazy to think he's been going that long

He used to have a crazy mustache

I remember it lol gone but not forgotten

Why’d you stop watching then

Probably aluminum-air.

@@erincarson8998 Probably. They are expensive and non-rechargeable, but store an enormous amount of energy for their size and weight (Wiki says about 1,300 Wh/kg, around 6 or 7 times better than li-ion) No idea about their safety or their discharge performance.

army radios are very different to a phone that is basically a mini pc, and don't require any where near as much power and are basically using no power while still being able to pick up signals

The GP never gets the good 💩

Probably lithium sulfur batteries...

*Citation needed...

You must bring it to market or you lose your patent, do some studying please.

@@hcox1111 They prefer to believe in fantasy so they can invent silly tales of heros and villains instead of admitting that the reality of our existence is far more mundane. Nobody is hiding some secret alien technology from the world, we're all just doing the best we can with what's available and that is all that we will ever do.

​@@hcox1111 there's always a loophole,,,,this being that u can always say u doing some improvements before releasing it and never actually release it 😢

I don't think it is that easy to keep the patent pending.@@ianmwangi2105

Wow you would get a dollar almost on a daily basis. Leave some for the rest of us bro, what are you going to spend all that money on!?

@@tomasarana8450 Batteries, apparently...

I don’t think you would be.

Yep. It MAY have been a battery, but it was not understood to be one, and was not used as one. It lacks a hole for a wire. The tube was not long enough, so there's no spot to connect anything to complete a circuit. The stopper was in the way. It was just storage. If it was actually used for electroplating, we would have electroplated artifacts, and the devices that made them, but we don't.

Yup

No one knows what they were it's all speculation. Every time an archeologist or historian doesn't know what something was they always say it was religious or ceremonial, if I had dollar for every time I've heard one say that...

​@@dickJohnsonpeterthank you. It's so annoying to hear AB archeologist proclaim what something was or wasn't and what it was and wasn't used for thousands of years ago. I have no issue with them giving an educated guess, but I have an issue with someone taking it wasn't a battery. How do they know? They don't. They can infer but they can't know for sure. I also saw people saying that while it's technically a battery, they didn't use it as such. Oh really? I didn't realize humans could live to be thousands of years old to know what people did or didn't know. You could maybe prove that ancients did know something but how do you prove they didn't know something? You can't.

@@dickJohnsonpeter Occam's Razor, buddy. We have plenty of evidence for the likes of religious or cultural use of objects. On the other hand take away this so-called battery and there's NO evidence for batteries in Mesopotamia or anywhere else... it's up to people making the claim to prove it. Try and think critically. Why isn't there other batteries found at this or any other sites? Where are the lightbulbs or electroplated materials? Would not such an advancement have been adopted all through the ancient world?

Sounds like something California would do

California is the worst state in America. I'm probably in the 2nd or 3rd worst, Illinois.

That sounds absolutely idiotic. What's the point in having your own solar then?

You buy solar panels, you plug them into whatever dwelling or device you chose… I don’t have to sell anyone anything.

I've been waiting decades for my flying car...

We kind of do, RTG's are really small, the issue isn't in the technology, but rather the danger involved. Do you want to trust random humans with a pocket battery that could irradiate and potentially depopulate a few city blocks?

@@HicSvntDracones yea it would be dangerous , some would sell it for drugs or get swindled out of it also haha

No you don't.

For the RC hobby li-ion (including polymer cells, same thing) cells are fine. You're probably not going to fly a 200 km/h model aircraft continuously for hours and hours. Passenger planes have different requirements :)

@@devilsoffspring5519 I totally get it. I just don’t run RC planes, I primarily run RC cars and trucks of all types from bash rigs to speed run rigs to rock crawlers. I feel like it would be most beneficial for bashers, they take a lot of abuse and one little compromise of a cell from a tiny rock finding it’s way wedged under the lipo and your RC car just went up in flames. I’ve seen it before cause I mostly bash and launch my bashers 50-80ft in the air off of jumps, so more durable batteries would be nice. Also, he said they’ve been able to run hundreds of cycles out of solid state lithium batteries. I’m lucky to get 50 runs before the lipo start to puff and swell, sometimes less. Then completely fail around 70-80 cycles, sometimes less. My castle link on xlx2 1/5 scale RC car says it’s pulling up to 500+ amp bursts tho in the data logs, that’s a lot of draw on a battery

@@stevensaid2200 It isn't so much a shortcoming of battery technology as running excessively high current to get the performance you want out of a given size pack. As an analogy, it's been possible for decades to get 1,000+ HP per liter of displacement from a gasoline engine--over 16 HP per cubic inch. Just don't expect it to last 250,000 miles.

@@devilsoffspring5519 haha that’s so true! I won’t know how they perform until they are ready for consumption but I wouldn’t be surprised if they don’t live up to my hopes and dreams lol I do realize that these cars aren’t meant to be jumped/dropped from heights of more than like 6ft, I’m a part of an extreme minority within the RC hobby . Bash it break it fix it repeat is my mantra for the last 6 years haha

@@stevensaid2200 Hehehe yeah, I used to fly RC and I quickly learned to buy the cheapest packs that got the job done. No point in a super-expensive flight battery that lasts 200-300 cycles when it gets splattered all over the countryside on the 6th or 7th flight :)

ukposts.info/slow/PLGeMg5GzLGWaXZWhR9HSMdHbZQcQ4xDfJ&si=ibndXJY3b34cJmX7

Lead rolled gold and graphite

People… stop using fake words like “hella”.

@@The.bo.you.never.no. Prolly the least offensive or cringe modern word contraction.

*Prolly* is another word you should stop using ​@@MyrKnof

And they will never let it see light. Profit is exponentially more important than effectiveness. Ruin the Earth? Shrug. entirely unsustainable? Whatever. Expensive as hell? Much better. 😊❤

If your charging over night it shouldn’t be a problem , when was the last time you drove a whole tank worth in a single day. I can’t remember ever doing that in the last 10 years atleast.

@@slowmomma7222 Someone's never driven between cities before...FYI, I've driven on city to city trips of ~800km here in Canada that require at least 2 gas tank refills on my Highlander Hybrid (range is usually around 600 - 700km per tank of fuel).

@@slowmomma7222 I do 50k km (32k miles) every year. More than 1 tank trips are norm.

I always thought the best solution to this would be like how service station do gas bottles. Bring your empty one in, grab a full one and away you go

@@MrElectrifyer yea I'm from Australia, its bit different here.

Na Ion Batteries will be the most prevalent for sure. However, watch out for Aluminum Ion Batteries also 🧐🤔

I work in the battery industry. Solid State has many problems as well. And Quantumscape is a SCAP Scam investment.

It will first explode your bank account though...

I'm going to tell that to my iPhone snobbish coworker'ss. I work in the space program. Most will laugh, but others, very few, will exclaim vile blasphemy, pronounce a vile curse on me., and then laugh because they find it funny also. Same goes for Andoid users. My manager is a huge Apple fanatic. One day, one of my Apple devotee friends ran to bossman and wailed how I was mocking the Mac. I was immediately called to be dressed down. Bossman said to me "Duce, you know your coworker is a huge snowflake. Please dont taunt him...unless I'm there."The whole office busted out laughing, even the "snowflake." I'm 70 and the "snowflake is also a boomer, about six years younger. I really dont want to retire I live my job, the people I work with, and especially the bossman. Worked with him for over 35 years

@@Urroner yeah things that never happened for 200 Alex

Story teller ... Indeed . The man is clueless and mostly peddling a LIE .

I tried to present data of actual uses and situations we encounter in farming over the POLITICS of this lie ... YT or him blocked most of my replies . I quit ... Believe the lies .

Sorry , I am not angry at you :( ... I am angry at politics . Later Mate

Hear! Hear!

I bet you read that in a fiction book didn't you?

​@@randysalsman6992 Validate your betting skill by specifically naming the "fictional" book 😊

Yea... the corporations won't pet us have electricity coca cola or Facebook. Damm

No. Energy is not free. Never. What would make you think that, *even if it did not cost anything to distribute the energy* -- wires, maintenance, insurance, etc -- the generation itself had no cost? Sorry. This time I can say that physics says you're wrong.

Well,, he talks with passion about those sleep masks so I guess he can talk passionately about anything. 😂

yeaa that would be quite difficult to make a solid state battery with high capacity and high current capability (there are already solid state batteries just for keeping the bios of the computers because they have long life). Current batteries are made from foils with the cative substance on them and separators rollsed together. It would be quite difficult to roll a ceramic separator. Also between 2 solid surfaces there are only a few points of contact and it would be difficult to make the electrodes and the electrolyte/separator so flat. As a consequence the current provided is very small.

Probably not going to happen. Do you think big tech that makes billions a year on crappy battery tech is going to give that up? Huge energy suppliers would go out of business.

they probbaly got batteies that charge themselves in the elites vaults.

He’s an author ffs not an archaeologist who mostly disagree with him 🤦‍♂️

it's just like cancer cure and hair loss cure. it's all money thing

There are only so many elements for the cathode and anode, there may not be a holy grail. I would think we would have found it by now.