How many subscribers do you need? I'm sure you get there since you create quality.

210 subscribers out of 354 viewers in about 40 minutes is a bad ratio, is it?

I just subbed my friend hope you do well with this new channel

Np buddy

I enjoyed this on many levels and was really impressed by the production quality.

Thanks! It always nice when the professionals approve my work ; ) Thats the highest honor.

You are very welcome! Keep up the amazing work!

I love the graph & statistics presentation. Very clear.

jotaro?

@@deepdive8755 Hi mate, I work as a marine biologist in Antarctica and I thought this was an excellent introduction into marine snow. Especially the difficulty of getting the organic material through pycnoclines. Great job!

Don't worry, we'll find a way to kill and eat them all.

@@machematix ikr

@@machematix facts

Long live the lantern 🐟 .

If they can work out a way to catch something & cook it, the Chinese will eat it!

fish in a nutshell

Always has been

Also, nobody likes the sound of their own voice in recordings. It tends to make people very self conscious. No one should blame you for outsourcing it, but now I wish I heard the original with your voice so I could boost your confidence!

Thanks! I appreciate it.

I dont mind watching it on youtube.

We used to watch the best documentaries on tv. But after 2012 everything changed. Even online it's extremely hard to find high quality as before

You need to see some UK documentaries eg Horizon. We also have some amazing FREE online courses eg Futurelearn.

Yeah, its very sad. Everytime i watch documentaries, they are either looking for bigfoot, making aquariums or doing surgeries on pets. I never ever see interesting and entertaining content like this. Wish we had more...

@@Koko-rc3pz lol

Don't worry! If it makes you uncomfortable you shouldn't force yourself! (I always thought your voice was very unique and outstanding and you always did a great job with your voice overs)

i am going to miss those beautiful german tones. But the quality hasn't suffered so it doesn't matter much

Excellent video but your voice was a big part of what i liked about your other channel. I realy hope you will consider going back to doing the voice-over yourself. But of course it all up to you!

I understand the choice, but i think your voice gave your channel a little more personal touch and made it stand out. Still suscribed, but i hope you will keep atleast narrating in facts in motion channel?

I hugely perfer your voice, but it was fine. If you'd like someone of your subscribers to doo it i would be able to do so.

Thanks! New video should hopefully be ready this month.

Tides happen twice a day.

I think this was a joke guys.

@@deepdive8755 to call a new and brilliant scientific theory a joke is part of a conspiracy to undermine the scientific enlightenment and keep the masses ignorant. Shame on you, evil agent of the devil.

@@gilbertodpaiva ...

@@rafaelmartinez9259 u think that was also a joke

Some day, maybe ;)

@@deepdive8755 either way, you’ll be deserving of every bit of fame your channel gets

@@tylnozcn27 true

@@deepdive8755 What happened? The world needs more! I imagine you picked up a great job some where that is keeping you too busy. I hope its worth it, you're still are the best video creator in my book. Godspeed!

@@deepdive8755 Do you need funding? Your videos are THE BEST!

Fishing boat captains in Asia, are not known for restraint!

They know nothing of the life span of these fish or the globally catastrophic consequences of tampering with there defence mechanism. Yet the narrator is already to refer to them as an untapped resource. Remember the collapse of the Atlantic Cod population that they said, "was not possible"? WAKE UP!!! These colonies are what is keeping us from extinction. LEAVE THEM ALONE.

@@georgemckenna462 It is even worse: These fish are the basis for the food chains that gives us the current food fish (which we managed to fish to extinction). That they only represent between 10 and 50 times the amount we fish yearly already is not promising, given that these fish are not directly meant for human consumption, but as feed for livestock (mostly fish, sometimes chicken) creating another barrier of a factor somewhere between 2 and 10. And we do not know how fast these reproduce. The whole system is in balance (an unstable balance most likely, but still) and we do not have to remove all of them to kil the population, just a large enough fraction of their reproductive capacity for the whole thing to collapse.

@@57thorns Considering the huge mass of fish, if we start fishing them like we fish normal fish, I'm pretty sure they won't go extinct. They are really numerous and fishing them could contribute to reconstruct other species numbers to normal amounts. Of course you need to study them first to not disturb their breeding mechanism or stuff like that, but anyway, looking at the graphics, it just looks like you were feeding on insects all of a sudden to help the fauna heal and reconstruct. Eating them wouldn't be a bad idea. The only bad idea is doing it to large, harmful amounts.

My thoughts exactly.

Wouldn't a superlative been a better choice than just a insert a word here that's the highest order of any adjective. Because sure Superlative can be used on it's own, however saying that something is superlative, aka of the highest quality or degree, is quite obnoxious because you can easily think of as many negative superlatives, So for example Worst is an excellent superlative, after all using a similar word such as excellent, magnificent or outstanding would be a lot more normal and you wouldn't seem like a prick. Due to using big words just to look smarter...

Loquacious is a loquacious word.

@@livedandletdie where the f*ck are you talking about

@@livedandletdie The fact that you need to point out such an insignificant grammatical error completely clashes with the atmosphere of the comments section and denotes a profound sadness and anger in your life. Also, try to treat him in a better way. He's an Italian guy who only tried to express his amazement and gratitude towards the creator of this video. No need to criticize him, at all.

Ciaoo adrian!!! L'ho scoperto anch'io il canale ed è bellissimo solo per questi due video documentari!!! Che belloooooo

Human bad

@@emilebichelberger7590 animal good

Well carbon has to be produced for other parts of the ecosystem to thrive, so in essence more carbon means more food, humans produce it abundantly which means we are just part of the process and not a cancerous mole on the earth which we are lead to believe.

@@pappy5204 human produced carbon is not what there eating it's the carbon locked up in the marine life near the surface which humans are rapidly depleting. There was a perfectly balanced carbon cycle already in place till we fucked it up.

@@emilebichelberger7590 Oh thats bad for you say and what you dont like gods creations😤😠😡

Scrat: I'm only using 0.1% of my power

@@lolbosss stand user: scrat Stand name: ZA NUTTO

@@goose9514 that sounds like an r/hentai stand than a squirrel stand

Red squirrel or grey squirrel ?

@@williamgoode9114 the hot one

Go get some sea animal then, Some sea animals reproduce by giving birth to a plankton that eventually grow and become that animal again vice versa

Bossyverb 25 yes

no, not everyone

@@froggleggers1805 dew it

But if we need them, why not breed them and put more in the ocean?

@@kayleighgilman5641 ughhhh - ur ignorance

@@yash1152 instead of being rude, tell me why my theory is incorrect, and what would happen if it goes out how I thought

@@kayleighgilman5641 okay. i will try to - in some days. sorry, and thanks for the polite call for explanation. and also, i hope we will have a constructive discussion - maybe.

@@kayleighgilman5641 because, overexploitation of anything is scientifically wrong. It will bring about some unnatural imbalance that we really have no idea about. Since we know so little the mesopelagic zone, it'll be simply foolish to play with such fire. For example if you over produce a single crop for decades, a certain amount of minerals from the soil depletes over time. Hence people came up with the idea of crop cycle techniques. Also farming lantern fishes will be a task next of impossible at the moment as they need suitable environment to breed, mate and reproduce. I don't know if humans will be willing to build an artificial facility that will replicate the deep mesopelagic zones of the ocean to a T. Even if we build such habitat, the cost would be so immense that multiple countries would need to partake in the such humungous project.

Thanks!

Ok?

@RANDY LEWIS L. COUNTRYMAN Well said Randy! People these days...

Facts

Any advanced civilization requiring energy would follow this cycle (atleast humanoid ones would)

@I find this to be interesting Jarp, jurp jup jup what

The four "E's", very catchy

...or subjected to increasing toxic pollution in the biologic 'snow'.

It is already a species at risk along the Pacific Northwest and Canadian west coastal areas. Over fishing, and habitat destruction as usual.

same. dope stuff

yes

True, but you know what happens when people realize there is money to be made somewhere.

We need more carbon we're in a carbon starvation. More green of the earth more vegetation CO2 is the gas of life like the gentleman said we don't need any more money sucking into fake science needed to go to real pollution lakes River streams agricultural runoff, smarter money

@@raphaelmoraczewski1106 "fake science" Yikes man.. yikes... Increase in natural disaster, increase in temperature, and the overall bad vibes from all the CO2 aren't enough for you I guess... Maybe it's a call that we have too many humans and inefficient methods.. not a need for more pollution causing disasters and water scarcity.... You know carbon scarcity was a term partially pushed by fossil fuel companies right?

@@tonytwinkletoes3149 nope, look at the data from nasa.... less, less less of all those categories

@@raphaelmoraczewski1106 That one is blatantly false, you're reading the data backwards my man.

Thanks, I appreciate it.

None

Good thing they not do same mistake as our's to gain conciosness..right, right?

@@AmestrisAlchemi5t it is.

@@yasminitarestuadinda9605 dont jink it

Thanks. The new episode is coming along nicely. Its over 40 minutes long, however, thats why it takes a while but it should be done in a few more weeks.

I'd say this is better than almost anything on tv. It's not plagued by 10 minute commercial breaks, dramatisation, repeats and cliffhangers.

Thanks.

whats the other channel?

@@phrog322 Facts in Motion

But enjoy what's actually in the video more.

Comprehensiveness will be a main focus of this channel

you just need that thick German.

I don't

Where can I find the older videos?

alex rogers lol

Wrong. It's All Nematodes!

What are his other channels?

@@milesgardner9918 Facts in Motion

@@skyem5250 thank you!

Well I have been pretty inactive this year. But now that I will be releasing videos again more regularly, who knows.

thanks! I appreciate it.

whats the primary channel?

@@phrog322 Facts in motion

CoolCalmCoop yes

I didn't think i was this shallow but i agree, I actually found myself clicking off this vid cause meh its just not the same without his voice.

That would be a shame because I have a lot of great videos planned here. But if thats how you feel than I cant change that. I will continue voicing for FiM so you will at least still have me there.

@@deepdive8755 Super nice episode, but sadly I feel that the new narrator lacks the personality you brought to the show :(

Really??? I'm finding that hard to understand because I thought the video was fantastic and it was very well done. Keep up the great work!

@@deepdive8755 Personally, I think your content and subject matter is getting more and more quality. The posts on this channel have been astonishing and educational. It'd be a waste to miss out based on narration.