/ creative_genius_2.0 How to make a drone- • How to make a drone at... how to make Arc reactor-: • how to make arc reacto...
КОМЕНТАРІ: 3 000
@mjyanimations10624 роки тому
That’s not a fricking jet engine, it’s a series of fans blowing at a butane flame
@YongJoon_Choi4 роки тому
Not a jet engine Fan Heater
@macieksoft4 роки тому
Sort of EDF with afterburner. Not a jet anyway.
@Whellypl-vb2og4 роки тому
It's just a small flamethrower. Not so useful tho.
@ghostrider73604 роки тому
🤧🤧No its a high tech jet engine for him He thought he use this engine in his privet jet🤣
@chuofmilk4 роки тому
USB power Engine
@aljhonm.parrera75094 роки тому
the title should be " how to make a gas stove"
@AlibinAbbas-bk8xs4 роки тому
Hahahaha
@benguela23994 роки тому
kkkkkkkk
@amitsaini6634 роки тому
right
@yuvaraj13864 роки тому
🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🤧🤧🤧🤧🤧🤧🤮🤮🤮🤮🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶
@abcdefa34204 роки тому
Tamilarasan
@fixmymobilesireland13393 роки тому
USB powered electrically blown dual tanked oversized cigarette lighter with external manual timber-sulfur type ignition. I believe that would be more suitable title.
@franken07023 роки тому
LMFAO
@tupak293 роки тому
I laugh so much :D
@fixmymobilesireland13393 роки тому
@@tupak29 nie ma za co :D
@JIC-DNP3 роки тому
EXACTLY!!! I was like... WTF-IGOHOTD? - What the fuck is going on here on this day???? 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤣
@bavanguron18463 роки тому
Lol Laughing for exact 1 min 😅😅😅😅😅
@Mike-ff7ib3 роки тому
Not even close to being a jet engine. It's a very poor electric blow torch.
@aidenpearce52753 роки тому
it's an jet engine afterburner
@supyogi3 роки тому
haha
@franken07023 роки тому
@@aidenpearce5275 No its not how a afterburner works.
@sciencechicken76693 роки тому
This is actually a motor jet. The world first "jet plane" "caproni campini n.1" used this type of an engine.
@franken07023 роки тому
@@sciencechicken7669 Its called an electric ducted fan (EDF), and is not really a jet engine.
@kirkbolas49854 роки тому
Your burner assembly needs to be placed inside the body of the engine along with a couple of baffles, one separating the 2nd & 3rd fan and another one behind the 4th to create the front wall of the combustion chamber. The first baffle should reduce the diameter of the air passage and the 2nd blade needs to have the tips trimmed to be just a wee bit larger in circumference than the pass through in 1st baffle. The hole in the 2nd baffle should be a little smaller than the pass through hole in the 1st baffle and the tips of blades 3 & 4 trimmed to be a wee bit larger than the pass through hole in the 2nd baffle. I suggest one more baffle at the end of the tube where the conical nozzle piece attaches. It should be about 75% the diameter of the outlet hole in the nozzle. Your fuel feed lines should be introduced about 1/4 of the length of the combustion chamber back from the 2nd fan blade baffle. Will your engine work like a proper air-breathing reaction motor? Maybe. Right now your design lacks any meaningful back pressure. The narrowing of the pass throughs will create a marginally better amount of compression and speed up the airflow due to the improvised Venturi effect that the first two baffles provide. The third baffle in the rear in concert with a defined combustion chamber will allow a modest amount of back pressure and as the combustion gas exits through the last baffle’s pass through, it’ll expand in the inside of the nozzle and push against the inside of the nozzle and the rear baffle as the gases are exiting through the nozzle; this in turn will create some modest amount of forward thrust according Newton’s 3rd law. As an aside, with the modifications I’ve suggested, the fuel ports into the bottom of the nozzle can be repurposed with a secondary fuel supply and potentially act as a weak afterburner stage. Good luck.
@Swigglewiggle4382 роки тому
Jeez man
@mikebergman18172 роки тому
@@Swigglewiggle438 Lol, intense.. But also accurate😆
@mortazah98262 роки тому
Took me two minutes to read and figure out what tf you just said
@animekiss33112 роки тому
brother u forget to mention where is the combustion fusion there is no fuse/ spark plugs and the air is not even compressed enough nor the structure is strong enough to withstand that kind of air pressure which a real jet needs let along if it can even survive the combustion from the fuel similar to car engine and then use that torque to push air and also control the intake propeller in front to balance out the air speed aka u increase the fuel combustion u also increase air intake and also get more compressed air to get in the ... what im saying is this video has no clue about what and how a jet works or even how to build a proper one this is more like a 9 year old making a small town city with toy type show case of jet nothing more then a gimmick
@animekiss33112 роки тому
@E Van wait ?? turbine ? engine ? ur addressing + comparing it to something that has no similarity. plus that has no shape of a turbine. u can call if a toy thats more better
@jonathankeith5244 роки тому
Whoah! This thing actually works. I glued mine to the back of my Toyota Corolla, and I got up to 250 mph! Then I ran out of lighter fluid.
@parasztfokaesayeti28574 роки тому
Is that true? Please be honest
@jonathankeith5244 роки тому
@@parasztfokaesayeti2857 I'm just joking my friend. Haha It looks cool though! :)
@parasztfokaesayeti28574 роки тому
@@jonathankeith524 Okay no problem. I'm just trying to find an actual working jet engine
@bomberex78094 роки тому
Parasztfóka és a Yeti 2 bruh it’s a 1inch diameter tube that has no compression. Obviously Jonathan is joking. Like even a normal rc jet engine would barely effect a corollas top speed.
@parasztfokaesayeti28574 роки тому
@@bomberex7809 I don't know what inch is I know the metric system and I'm not a jet engineer. I just want to make a working one at home which is strong enough to push things with wheels
@RegisMichelLeclerc2 роки тому
Nice job, but I see at least 2 big problems: - all your fans are on the same axle, which implies the air flow is at about a constant speed from the second fan. My works on propfan showed each step must be spinning at a higher speed than the previous one, which is essential with contra-rotating fans to avoid gyroscopic precession, but the idea is still the same whatever flow you're working on. - each subsequent step must be smaller than the previous one to increase air compression and thus speed at the output nozzle. To combine the two, the simplest is to have a single motor shaft with belts and each fan on its axis (all collinear) and proportional gear reduction. It's a tad more complicated than this one (because of the bets and the separate axes), but it makes it much more efficient. Also, how about soldering the pieces together (not even brazing or welding) once superglued to reduce the air leaks?
@success_studio8 місяців тому
Can we text?
@RegisMichelLeclerc8 місяців тому
@@success_studio feel free to email me. What I'm saying is that all the work is done by the first fan. The second fan provides no acceleration -- or something very marginal due to the fact that the first fan is not physacally "perfect", theory and practice may differ. On the second (and all further other fans), the input speed and output speed are pretty much the same if both fans are the same size and speed, even contra-rotating. Now, contra-rotating is the reason for the extreme noise, which is mostly generated between the propellers: Since your fluid is spinning in one direction and you're trying to reverse that spinning direction, so, yeah, your air will go from -speed to +speed, it's just perpendicular to the axis you want:and has absolutely no effect on the propulsion force, or marginally by accumulating pressure at the tips of your fans (not where you want it, unless it's severely funneled). Also, the distance between propellers is very important to avoid unwanted turbulence. If the sound is what you want, then it's fine. If you're looking for any form of thrust, think again. Have a look to Integza's channel, he's trying for ages to make a working jet. Also, if you want to explore that domain, you can have a read of NASA's report about... propfans (id 19870019120). It explores the physics and fluid dynamics of 2 contra-rotating "special" propellers and all the tests made in different configurations. I know, 476 pages... unless you're trying to build one to create something even better, that's a pretty boring read of 476 pages, but totally worth it to figure out what's hidden behind it. Enjoy!
@davidbwn3 місяці тому
Most crude working designs are on a single shaft. Should see what they do with truck turbos.
@leokimvideo3 роки тому
Nice, kids where I live are sucking on BIC lighters and making metal cones not turbines
@hightechredneck33623 роки тому
Reminds me of when I was a kid. Got it wrong, but went on to learn. Like leokimvideo said, he's doing something. He'll keep going, he'll learn.
@Vilvaran3 роки тому
Waiit... Is this whom i think it is???
@Vilvaran3 роки тому
@the Teo leokimvideo - I'm pretty sure he's the redback spider guy! I remember watching the mantis VS redback videos, and the series where he kept a whole bunch in a tank, and would film the "life of redbacks"...
@yasminzahra33333 роки тому
So how he have so many viewers
@Supercarlsunday3 роки тому
😂😂😂😂🙈
@btcgambler12704 роки тому
1.2m views as of this post x 12 minutes is 27.4 years of humanity wasted.
@xXxDeamonlordxXx4 роки тому
Thats why i jumped right to 12 minutes right away after reading the first comment... It looks like thats how common people look at gas turbines... Dont they inform themselfes how turbines are working before they glue something like that together?
@surindersingh58334 роки тому
Absolutely right 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@solaymanislam23494 роки тому
😚😚
@premdeepsethi48984 роки тому
Hehehe
@truthconscience813 роки тому
You think we saw it for 12 min? 6 sec
@friedec36224 роки тому
in the jet engine, the air is compressed and there the fuel is added then ignited in the compressed chamber, so the thrust is multiplied by the expanding air. And also the jet engine not necessary need turbine, as long it has continuous compressed air and fuel that exploded it can called a jet (turbinless jet is called ramjet engine) . But this video, fuel is at the end side of blade. Moreover it ignited at the outside. In conclusion, its just a rotor that bursting fire.
@wtkvslowguy4 роки тому
Bernard Ctxy yes this jet engine would have been a lot better with a proper combustion chamber and better fuel System
@glitchinthematrix57614 роки тому
I think super glue is the wrong fastener to use in a proper jet
@ketchuplover31974 роки тому
Bernard ctxy It doesn't matter how the configuration is, if it creates thrust it is a jet engine
@glitchinthematrix57614 роки тому
@@ketchuplover3197 what he built is a model of a ducted fan with an afterburner. Wich is not a jet. It's a ducted fan with pointless afterburner. That would not creat any trust because you can't expect to get any pressure to build up inside the duct. Trust comes from fuel mixed with compressed air. You can't create pressure in a civ.
@ketchuplover31974 роки тому
@@glitchinthematrix5761 of course, it impossible to create nessecary thrust to move with that engineering design It is just a 'flame with a fan'
@adrianreyes47023 роки тому
Very Cool! Although like the naysayers said, it is not a true "jet engine", as the combustion is not occuring between a compressor, and turbine, (yours is after the fan), the principal is still somewhat similar for demo purposes to younger people. Great job! You would be a great educator to spark interest for those who might decide to pursue the science of it further in life.
@BurlehmangusРік тому
It’s not at all “somewhat similar. It’s just a fan blowing a flame. For educational demonstration, this is exactly what we don’t want.
@emilyhouse9642Рік тому
You're as dumb as she is
@NeilCrouse9911 місяців тому
I understand what you're trying to convey here and getting kids into science is something I'm ALL for. But my biggest bitch is our educational system in North America, mostly the United States, (sorry, truth doesn't care about feelings). We, in this educational system, have forgotten to teach our children how to think critically/rationally. And because of this people, don't mature with confidence in their own abilities to find truth in what's presented to them. Instead of maturing and growing up, people just get older and are easily moldable in their perceptions of sometimes what's right in front of them/us and obvious as things can be. But we have no tools to think in a rational/critical manner. THIS is why North Americans, score in the lower ends of first world countries in many, many areas.
@KanadMondal9 місяців тому
It has an afterburner but no combustion chamber, the idea of a jet engine is to compress air, not really to just make many turbine, the air is not being compressed just fanned toward a flame (as someone else said). It is very cool but after consideration it really is not similar to a jet engine.
@adrianreyes47029 місяців тому
@@KanadMondal Yeah. Funny. It reminded me how when BBQing, I quickly get the flaming black coals red hot, ready to go in a matter of minutes simply by directing my leaf blower on full blast into the metal container. BBQing afterburners.
@halnwheels2 роки тому
25 years ago before model jet engines were available commercially, folks were making them out of compaing gaz containers and using VCR head bearings. Someone was machining the compressors and selling them at flying events. This was pretty clever, but I doubt it can produce useful thrust.
@bugraduzyol18134 роки тому
This is just a flamethrower and unfortunately not a successful one. I don't think you understand the principles of thrusting and engines.
@harleyme31634 роки тому
I think this is another one of those east indian video's trying to make them look smart... but alas, it always backfires and makes them look dumber. in fact if I knew how jet engines worked at 6 years old, I think these guys are going backwards in intelligence :-\
@beaumontmuni4 роки тому
it's more like a flame throwup!!! .. 🤮
@bugraduzyol18134 роки тому
@@harleyme3163 If they try they can raise a person like Bose. But I started to think they don't even try these times.
@depinder4 роки тому
Chill guys , you seems like offended for no reason. Instead of saying his whole experiment wrong why don't you just say the title of the video is wrong and it should be flamethrower or something. Unlike you, english is not his first language and you should encourage people for what they are doing.
@ruthb.67894 роки тому
@@depinder he did it wrong.
@snoorgat1174 роки тому
Yeah sure. Let’s glue the turbine fans. Totally safe huh!
@NathanEDavis3 роки тому
I was wondering if anyone else noticed.
@lapajgoo45723 роки тому
You probably wouldn't even notice one of them coming loose
@priteshhalwalkar38523 роки тому
Hahahahaha
@ashishranjan19653 роки тому
Bade bewakoof ho tm
@bimaloli4523 роки тому
NAIC bahut axa mera nam bimal he
@stanleydsouza6723Рік тому
At least Efforts taken Truly admirable here as above who does this in slums as we hear background noise in a country like India ,for Aeromodelling enthusiasts and other scientific platforms there is little or no space at all, only the glamour, rich and mighty with little or no knowledge, or interest just pushed in for photo pics..Thanks to this lad implementing his soul to the tech world.
@RamKumar-fg4im3 роки тому
Good one 👍, try making the glue and spacers heat resistant and put them in fan- flame tube- turbine arrangement. You will have a real jet engine.
@aadityakothari42284 роки тому
It’s just a fan with fire 🔥 😒
@prosniperyt-telugu77964 роки тому
@@staticmode25 dude listen!!! for jet engine it requires turbine to drive the shaft again and again, and it is not simple as u think... even for a small jet engine rpm is 1lakh and u can hear super sonic sounds from engine.. heres I cannot see any turbines or internal combustion chambers, diving shafts etc.. and finally the engine in the video yes it is a jet engine (only for the people who have no idea on actual jet engine )😅
@somadityasohini65024 роки тому
@@prosniperyt-telugu7796 true but it was fun to watch,,, noobs out there making a jet engine a miniature one hell na bruh not impossible,,,
@davidpayne43154 роки тому
Just a pretty flame thrower
@BGTech14 роки тому
Real jets engines are self-sustaining. This silly little fan flame thing is not
@MK-qh7jq4 роки тому
BG Tech bruh I’ve seen a plastic jet engine self sustain. This is kinda sad.
@masmainster4 роки тому
There's twelve minutes I'm never getting back.
@valak1984 роки тому
Watch how to make mini time machine.
@21centuryskiziodman4 роки тому
No sh!t . What a waste. .
@Aryan-yw7ym4 роки тому
@@valak198 hy
@devvart4 роки тому
classic
@noyalvolter4 роки тому
ha i just skipped to the end to see the result, therefore only 2 minutes is wasted😎😎
@Ben-bg2lp3 роки тому
In the beginning of the video, when I saw he was super gluing the little metal beam to the cylinder, I thought wow! That glue must be top tech that can resist jet engine heat! 😐
@evnngsky3 роки тому
I don't know when the definition of Jet engine had changed.
@edgararcega30464 роки тому
"At last. Marshmallow toaster is complete."
@024-venkateshkondaparthi24 роки тому
😂😂😂😂
@bzxae71334 роки тому
Epic
@dtx.montage18454 роки тому
Hahaha
@trafficjon4004 роки тому
a small little toasty marsh- hole.
@sashragesh4 роки тому
Mythic
@Warsalibum4 роки тому
this is not a jet, this is an ordinary nozzle, there is no need to make blades, but just make holes in the radius, the only engine in this design is the Chinese motor
@lucianosantos23163 роки тому
true very true
@prisnrev52653 роки тому
It's just a Jet Kid Toy, unfortunately it's not a real mini turbine jet engine that I imagine before. I have seen full view 12 minute and regret.
@paulmaxwell8851Рік тому
OK, this is not a jet engine. But he had fun, and this is exactly the kind of thing I used to do when I was a kid. I didn't know what I was doing but I did my best, and learned a lot along the way. Eventually I got into the design and engineering of building systems. Kids, learn how to build things with your hands!
@udgrafdes2 роки тому
I'm just coming on here to point out for many of the people who are arguing below that it isn't a jet engine. This IS a jet, but it isn't an engine. What makes an engine an engine is the fact that on each cycle, more energy is released than is required for the next cycle. The next cycle gets the energy it needs, and the remainder of the energy is exhausted to the environment. Jet engines don't have cycles in the same sense as a piston engine, but they are analyzed the same way. For this to have been an engine, the energy released by burning the fuel would have to be captured in some way (turbines after the burn chamber) and put back into the input side for the next cycle -- to wit, if the prime mover (the electric motor) is removed and the jet doesn't self-sustain, it isn't an engine. As an aside, what this guy did was basically built a model salamander (those heaters that people have in their garages and on construction sites that look like a jet). Mind you, I'm using a practical definition of an engine, not the exact thermodynamic definition, though I've never seen anything to indicate that there's any such thing as a non-self-sustaining heat engine.
@_skyyskaterРік тому
underrated reply!
@v98855218114 роки тому
I knew something was wrong when the title said jet engine and the first thing he used is fevikwik....😆😆
@rohanexplore4 роки тому
exactly bro XD
@alexanderhurlburt26414 роки тому
I whoud like To make that and mount it on mu scooter
@peterparkeer62654 роки тому
True 🤣🤣🤣
@prisnrev52653 роки тому
It's just a Jet Kid Toy, unfortunately it's not a real mini turbine jet engine that I imagine before. I have seen full view 12 minute and regret.
@Vilvaran3 роки тому
Ah fevikwik... that brings back some memories XD And yes, JET engine. Held together with crazy glue... I think the 3D printed engines might even last a bit longer; since the blades actually spin???
@harryo19484 роки тому
That's not a jet engine, but still impressive and took time to make!
@yosltsum3 роки тому
this probably took 5 minute to make lol
@harryo19483 роки тому
@@yosltsum it took some time right?😅🤷♂️
@prisnrev52653 роки тому
It's just a Jet Kid Toy, unfortunately it's not a real mini turbine jet engine that I imagine before. I have seen full view 12 minute and regret. Wasted time
@adamjung5583 роки тому
I thought this was going to be a functional turbojet or something.. oh well it's a start. Got to have a compressor with tolerance so that proper compression takes place without pressure loss through intake, etc.. I define the jet by it's ability to self sustain,only use electric to start it up. I'd start with an old turbo or something.. I'm currently dissecting a Dyson for a small compressor wheel.. it is a start though sir..
@forktailarts70693 роки тому
Even though this video wasn't what I expected....It can't be considered a waste of time..Good jugaad👏🏼
@alfredkhoo13534 роки тому
it certainly won't break any sound barrier anytime soon, view it as a scaled down simplified but with a similar concept to that of a jet engine, because what jet engine is it's basically a bunch of high speed turbine sucking in air from the front, pressurize the air in the middle, and combust it with spraying fuel as the air were being forced out at the rear at a very high velocity, thus achieving the speed of sound. believe it or not, the concept of a jet engine is actually simpler to understand than that of a regular piston engine which a car uses, because it really is just a bunch of giant fan and some pipe that spew out fuel, the rest is physics.
@loptiu694 роки тому
Come on guys, give the Dude some credits, this is a legit jet engine, working only on afterburners, he has the compressor, doesn't have the combustion chambers, has replaced the turbine with the electrical motor, he has the afterburner nozzles. You got to start from somewhere, the Dude is really creative, I'll give him thumbs up. Good job Man!!! After you study Thermodynamics and gas turbine cycles in college, you won't be that enthused to make jet engines.
@maniacobroz67093 роки тому
Yeah no it's just a fan attached to a flame... Nothing more
@PastelPiku3 роки тому
Liking the enthusiasm but yeah that's basically all it is lol
@unity200003 роки тому
They did a number on you in college huh Stanislav... That's thermodynamics for you...
@howardbartlett34193 роки тому
Not sure about everyone else, but I actually quite enjoyed thermodynamics. It actually has made me much more enthusiastic about engineering. But yeah, this is more of a boosed EDF than anything, but it is still exciting for someone who hasn't had much engineering experience yet.
@johnorabone61123 роки тому
Come on dude, fancy cigarette lighter at best. Not even close to a jet or turbine
@johnishikawa22002 роки тому
Very interesting! With some refinement, I can see that someone could actually make a crude, but workable jet engine like this a better than a toy!
@Perseverence3 роки тому
This video at least gives you the idea that there are compressors, fuel supply, ignition and combustion chamber in a jet engine. I liked the video
@tany66444 роки тому
watch from 12:16 Thank me later for saving your time.
@isaiahbenjamins88184 роки тому
bruh
@timrogers26384 роки тому
I wish I'd read down to your comment before pressing "Play"...
@purelife90814 роки тому
And money😀
@mikuhorizon4 роки тому
Bruh
@phatbusted4 роки тому
Thank U Jesus !!!
@rayeesmd5393 роки тому
That was for a children to get the concept..... appreciate the kid effort....Bravo....
@ColinWatters3 роки тому
I wouldn't want my children to think this is how jet engines work.
@benzorabidbilly2 роки тому
Lol. Yep. Play with fire in, oh, bangladesh where there's no fire department and any kid can play!
@browse37612 роки тому
seriously do u even know what is jet engine in first place ?
@NeilCrouse9911 місяців тому
I'm skeptical that it's producing thrust though... It looks like a fancy torch TBH.
@reganstudio71073 роки тому
I like it when I got a video with the "How Jet Engines Work" title on my recommendation sidebar
@davekavanagh75994 роки тому
You made a cool lighter, that jet engine title is just misleading
@wickedsnipes57144 роки тому
The title talks about making a jet engine. Me: sees cheap galvanized metal, goes to click out. This guy: *superglue* Me: *sits back down*
@yosltsum3 роки тому
s u p e r g l u e I died
@ashutoshmourya47483 роки тому
Random Iodine Namak advertisement in background 😂 Struggle of every youtuber in India
@wolmntnРік тому
When I see it work without the electric motor connected to it I will believe it. 😂
@Legoperson754 роки тому
Would make a pretty cool afterburner for a ducted fan. It looks cool as heck but doesn’t really produce any real thrust.
@3npitsu9924 роки тому
Yup it is an edf with a post burner ;) try changing the motor with a drone one, they're ac motors and they cost almost nothin'
@skaterboi692 роки тому
in other words he could have just made a very simple flame holder to make it a whole lot more impressive
@cocafernet62423 роки тому
I can imagine an aircraft with a very long cable to the power supply.
@knockingman74834 роки тому
more accurately called: "fire amplifier engine"
@pooorman-diy11042 роки тому
journey to mars is more economical now ....
@carlosmejia57284 роки тому
SUGGESTED TITLE : HOME MADE INEFFICIENT BLOW TORCH
@onseriojrРік тому
The Sabji man shouting out side reminds me of Bhopal many years ago.
@ferretface87823 роки тому
I'm so glad I skipped to the end... and saved 12 minutes of life.
@prisnrev52653 роки тому
You are lucky, but I regret spending 12 minutes wasted time watching this useless video, finally I realized this is a Prank Video, the content creator was making a Kid Toy Jet engine
@user-ey4sg7dk1c4 роки тому
Title How can i steal someone else's time? or This is a way to spend time when a person infected with corona is isolated.
@yjw007124 роки тому
한국사람 찾았다ㅋㅋㅋ
@user-ey4sg7dk1c4 роки тому
@@yjw00712 울릉도 동남쪽 뱃길따라 이백리 ㅎㅎㅎㅎㅎ
@wecanbuildit21964 роки тому
man, a jet engine is not so easy to manufacture, but if you had made a combustion chamber not between the turbines but between them, maybe something would have happened
@yellow13_4 роки тому
We can build it Wait... not between them but... between them? What?
@wecanbuildit21964 роки тому
@@yellow13_ that google translate
@Babihrse4 роки тому
He said not but yes
@bringer-of-changeРік тому
definitely the right concept. as for how much thrust this particular engine outputs though....
@ElkaBoySPBРік тому
Jet engine which works by electric engine, GENIUS
@spotsterjon74cu4 роки тому
Colin Furze does some mad things with home mad jet engines.
@EnriqueCastroRios4 роки тому
Colin is way better that this kid, he makes the a jet engine bigger than a real one, and hi make it in his home Colin is better
@himawansutanto-ri1tf3 роки тому
Up
@wingnutzster3 роки тому
Irrelevant, this is a mini model of a blow dryer
@paulkremastiotis62964 роки тому
come on guys ,its a young man having fun n hopefully young children will be inspired with some messing about crafts no need for the immature comments
@KRIPP5484 роки тому
Teaching young children to be creative by playing with lighters and flames. Good thinking! DOH!
@illegallife114 роки тому
This is cool when I was young I play with mirror and took apart my dad camera for the lenses and made telescopes now older I design and put together telescopes ... so this video here this young man one day can put us in a rocket because he might one day find the formula to go interstellar with out refueling
@BGTech14 роки тому
I’m 14 and I’m a whole lot smarter then the dummy who made this
@illegallife114 роки тому
@@BGTech1 ok lets see it make a jet engine up load it
@BGTech14 роки тому
illegal life making a self-sustaining jet engine is vary difficult there are lots of calculations and simulations that go into designing a real self sustaining jet engine. By definition a jet engine is self sustaining and this one in the video is not. Therefore not a jet engine. There are simpler jet engines that are easier to make that are called pulse jet engines. I haven’t yet gotten the time to build a pulse jet because I’m so busy with school and more important things.
@arjithunnikrishnan35703 роки тому
That Background noise thou😂👌
@4thesakeofitname11 місяців тому
Wow... May be not efficient, or useful at all, but still demonstrates the "jet" principle !
@user-pp4ie3rt2h4 роки тому
Second Video named " Windmills powered by Brushless motor"
@druls11114 роки тому
It's not even a brushless motor
@ihateyoutubeidentificador4 роки тому
The video should be named like "How to make a mini stove with mini fans in series"
@Ryan-fy3ww4 роки тому
Should've named it how to steal someone's comment.
@ihateyoutubeidentificador4 роки тому
@@Ryan-fy3ww the comments gave me an inspiration, right?
@Ryan-fy3ww4 роки тому
@@ihateyoutubeidentificador 😂 seems legit
@ihateyoutubeidentificador4 роки тому
@@Ryan-fy3ww 😭👌
@prisnrev52653 роки тому
This is stupid prank video, the title video must be How To Make A Kid Toy Jet Engine
@stanleydsouza6723Рік тому
Efforts are truly commendable than doing nothing..God Bless 🙌 such Efforts 👌
@neilwilsonmillet89072 роки тому
Cool, that's the first ever battery powered jet engine
@Lord22254 роки тому
Jet engine should suck&burn fuel between rotors to initiate a chain reaction.
@beaumontmuni4 роки тому
Yeah this just sucks! 😝
@abhishekagarwal8464 роки тому
Engine=thrust No thrust =no engine
@RCPlaneAddict2 роки тому
that was amazing. How loud was that little thing? Looks pretty sweet. Drank that fuel quick!
@abdulrehmanjutt1611Рік тому
"Thank you very much "I didn't thaught that this would be easy to create a jet engine
@kelsroom24 роки тому
JET ENGINE! in ur imagination! Reality, gas stove powered by motor.
@3bigbignig-abandoned4 роки тому
Why are the comments so negetive? I find this amazing
@friedec36224 роки тому
yep, it's amazingly beautiful fire spitter
@dionjennings23794 роки тому
Because your mind is simple
@MmmMmm246804 роки тому
People just like to criticize. Ok he she gave a wrong title so all are up to slaughter him her. Sad world
@3bigbignig-abandoned4 роки тому
@@MmmMmm24680 True
@paulromsky9527Рік тому
That is an just an Afterburner with no Combustion chamber. If you used metal spacers instead of plastic, and welded the pieces together instead of super glue, you can add in fuel injection ports between the fin pairs in the middle of the engine (Combustion Chamber) with their own fuel tanks (lighters) - not wide open like you did with the Afterburner fuel tanks. Then you run the motor as a starter as you ignite the Cumbustion Chamber fuel, then shut off the motor. The engine should run slowly on its own. Then if you press the Afterburner tank buttons the thrust will increase.
@eminstinct411411 місяців тому
You also need ball bearings and to balance the blades or else it’ll never go on it’s own
@pizzainc.14652 роки тому
It actually works exactly like a jet engine. All he has to do is get rid of the motor, clip the fuel tank on, and throw it like a dart.
@royjeuring4 роки тому
Absolute waste of my time... 😧 Jet engine..... Sure...
@ekremerenler38514 роки тому
I agree
@aayzersifer85844 роки тому
royjeuring you try making something off scratch and uploading to UKposts
@shaukatara85944 роки тому
It is just waste of time
@gordondahle75834 роки тому
12 minutes of my life - Lost forever!
@humphreykirauni85323 роки тому
😂 😂 😂 😂
@randelcandel34232 роки тому
Be nice to see how much thrust that multi fan turbine produces. Electric jet basically
@fakethoven4623 роки тому
Better than the regular DC motor with a fan
@10Luqman3 роки тому
Thats why i read comments first than start watching any videos 😂😂
@bellatibay67844 роки тому
this ain't a jet engine, although in fairness you did give me a few ideas there to miniaturize stuff, with a few mods on this design i think i can make a true mini jet engine. if nothing else, this design can take out a single robber's face if correctly-placed by the door at night (weapon of opportunity from household items; don't laugh at a steel spoon for being a steel spoon, in my hands i can stab that into someone's jugular or carotid attacking me while i'm eating), he'll still be alive, but now he has a real problem in his very face, his painful broken face is now his problem. thanks dude.
@prisnrev52653 роки тому
This is a joke and Prank Video, he just made a Kid Toy Jet engine
@flashbao19223 роки тому
i hope he knows how much temp a jet engine reaches, that's enough to vaporise those glues and pretty much anything in it!
@dillonhagan7433Рік тому
I’m only 12 (although all of my teachers say I am incredibly smart for my age) and I know that this is not at all a turbojet engine (which is what he was quote on quote “making”) although you did get the first 2 stages correct, there are 3 stages which is where the exhaust spins fans behind the flame which are connected to the “fans” in the front which causes it to suck in more air which causes it to burn faster which causes it to spin faster which causes it to suck in more air which causes it to burn more which causes it to spin faster and this cycle repeats and, ba da bing ba da boom you now know how a jet engine works. Thank you for your time.
@bzjttpoz4 роки тому
There should be a compressor, combustion chamber and turbine. This is just an electric powered compressor, something that we could call a combustion chamber, but no turbine to spin the compressor. Please, take a look how jet engine works.
@SNairGS4 роки тому
Nice stove ❤️..:
@arctic30323 роки тому
With an adjustable gate, you could tune the afterburner too 🤗
@albeniasantos56932 роки тому
Muito bom Parabéns nota 10 Obrigado
@shamandesmith5384 роки тому
damn son you know you're making the absolute most of that itty-bitty bottle of Super glue!😁
@j.r.5764 роки тому
Wow, a multi-fan butane flame blower. Functions nothing like a jet engine.
@ronwhitehead3824Рік тому
Only thing super about this is the glue. I hope it is high temp. But still good to watch small things being made.
@rockapedra1130Рік тому
Err ... I'd call this a fan blowing lighter fluid out the back of a tube. It might produce barely non-zero thrust because it is basically a simple afterburner. The jet engine itself is missing, there's an electric motor with fan blades instead. All that being said, I liked this video!
@Calthecool4 роки тому
If you clicked on this video actually expecting to see a real jet engine, I feel sorry for you. You should know by now that this stuff is never good.
@Quatuux4 роки тому
Clicked on it just to dislike it. Was not disappointed by the content xD
@BGTech14 роки тому
This video is just a fan blowing on a flame. not a jet engine at all
@nextlevel77904 роки тому
Great effort and creativity in trying to explain a concept, Although not very accurate on the working principle of a jet engine .. Appreciate what you have done. Cheers.
@thespectator33124 роки тому
What concept is he trying to explain?
@johnhmielewski1230Рік тому
He said JET engine not motor controlled.
@amritdas-zw9bu7 місяців тому
When i see oily skin and technical approach in video i first give the video a like than i watch the video❤
@gkdresden2 роки тому
Hm, I think it is just an electrically driven fan burner. It would be interesting to measure the thrust without and with butane.
@LoverBoy-hl7rz4 роки тому
Outcome : 3 lighters , and one a4 size of steel foil wasted .....
@siddharthasarmah61724 роки тому
It looks like an afterburner without frame tubes without a jet engine
@ArktourosUltorMaximus76003 роки тому
You can make the engine bigger. The bigger the better (as long as it doesn't get too heavy lol)
@Indonesiancute3 роки тому
Kompor jos . Yang biasa di pake penjual gorengan ..
@timrogers26384 роки тому
"Jet engine" my ass! First, there are rotor stages, but no corresponding stators. Second, the rotor "stages" don't compress the incoming air. They merely accelerate it. Finally, the continued accelerated combustion of the butane is reliant upon the electric motor. If this were indeed a jet engine, a set of turbine stages being turned by the expanding combustion gasses would draw in air trough the compressor stages and sustain the combustion in the burner "can". This is about as much a "jet engine" as lighting a fart.
@putinirvladim35184 роки тому
He almost set that thing on fire..🤣
@barryl88574 роки тому
He used an electric motor to turn a couple of fan blades to blow a gas flame. Not even close to jet engine. What a fool
@crunchysoup4063 роки тому
can yall fucking chill out godam i would like to see you do better with the same tools and money he had
@timrogers26383 роки тому
@@crunchysoup406- Nope. This isn't a jet engine. It's a fan blowing flames. I admit I couldn't do better with he tools and materials that he had, because jet engines are so precise that making one needs more than the tools and money he had.
@solutioni33943 роки тому
nobody asked
@WaleffCampos4 роки тому
Eu tava aqui triste ,mas parei pra assistir esse vídeo e até q me deu uma animada ,. Gostei do vídeo , não liga pra quem fica falando mal dizendo q desperdiçou alguns minutos das vidas insignificantes deles aqui. ...o vídeo foi bem legal , continua fazendo mais vídeo assim ,pois na vida sempre tem aqueles q querem desanimar a gente a desistir . é aí q as coisas vão começar a melhorar pra gente, pois quanto mais a gente evolui ,mas gente sem graça aparece pra desanimar a gente . Mas no final a gente sempre vence
@nestar_planetovich4619Рік тому
Философия это не про тебя
@Vincent-bb8voРік тому
Cool
@johnw.ryoniv89533 роки тому
That's an afterburner with no jet engine...can you make it self-sustaining?
@user-gn5iy7zd3eРік тому
最近有点失眠,这条视频确成功把我看困了,但我还是坚持看完了,万万没想到最后居然是自己点的火
@kyroush46864 роки тому
"Jet Engine" ? I just smile
@chuprandi37114 роки тому
Say hello say hello to Garnier lite.. "intense salesman shouting"
@owenweng7500Рік тому
印度阿哥做的只能算像一台发动机,如果后面的马达去掉就好了😁
@Russia_2024_Original8 місяців тому
Я через несколько секунд: пять минут полет нормальный!