ukposts.info/have/v-deo/smiTfY6chGaDq2w.html Your welcome :)

That's my neighbors

The Arfons brothers used to do this with F86 engines chained to trees outside their workshops on the jet powered Green Monsters. I got to see two iterations of the Green Monster. It ran at full military power at the starting line, then cut in the afterburner for a big blast thru the quarter mile when they were green lighted. Saw them at Kansas City International Raceway and St. Louis International Raceway about 1970.

i would not mind at all would love it jump the fence with my♿

debe de ser muy guapo si fuera una vecina

Or a jet powered hang glider with lasers?

What makes you think he hasn't?!?!?😏

Athif Mohamed hasn’t posted it yet

Jet powered bandsaw. The one he has Is underpowered🤣

Get another 2 and build an RC Hunter/Killer Skynet drone.

Or Colin Furze.

Or Hacksmith

Or Electroboom

Or me.

@@LungsMcGee 💀

Pretty satisfying

@@alessiocarraro7778 And closer to a full size engine.

yup makes for more realism when building a scale plane .model ... you can have a preheater cart for the engines ... or you can have it use a built in Auxillary Power-up Unit and spool the engines like he did ... saving on your flight battery and it can be all electric to pre-heat and spin up since you can use a glow plug style heater which has the added advantage of actually being able to start the fuel when hot enough ... with a sensor for when the engine has taken over you can then switch the APU to charge and let it sit back for ride

It Sick innit 👌🏿

Slow start up is more realistic, its like being at Heathrow.

\*tries the same in a piston engine\* "Why is my engine half way across the country?"

@@SOIBand piston #2 found another habitat planet lmao

@@TelmenBudsuren Idk why I did this but I thiiink the piston stroke required to achieve earth escape velocity at 40000 rpm is 53.5m

You could probably get a piston engine to spring over 15k idle....rpms is rotations per minute..... decrease bore and stroke add more pistons by the time your able to spin that high you'd probably have a 60 cylinder engine

Yes, it would be screaming

I need your help with a project I will be working on in the near future. Need some advice.

Definitely going to purchase this but I’d like to install this on my truck. Any advice?

The best kind of correct

Jet engines are just really angry brushless air compressors

@@KnowledgePerformance7 their not angry, just different and difficult to work with

@@e_g4239 nah, they just angry

@@e_g4239 cant tell dude, cant tell.

Ikr

I came down to write the same thing 😂

@@todddooley793 me to, i hope he upload videos every day i hope so 😊

That's what I was thinking, too!

Legit

hahahaha

I was thinking the same about my Focus ST225.

If a rotary could do 125000 rpm, it would chew fuel even faster than the jet.

Have a look at an F111 doing a dump and burn... Jet engine, thirsty enough. Now add an after burner. Now dump extra fuel overboard to create an even bigger flame out the back.

Try to compare the wankel with a liquid rocket engine.. It'll make your engine look very frugal and economical

check out gravity industries, they make jetsuits out of these things

My thicc ps4 on youtube

OMG, so funny! My PC started acting really weird, slowing to a crawl the other day. Couldn't understand why until I ran Rask Manager. Turns out - surprise - I had like 94 Chrome tabs running. Talk about a pig on memory!

firefox > chrome

this is real. Its not happen on AAA game but Chrome 😂

Turn off Hardware acceleration.

lol reminds me of the old joke .... yup my car is fast ... it can beat anything on the road ... except a gas station .. it stops for those

andymouse123 4.0l I6?

Literally my bike at the moment 12mpg

@@NOONE-hp8bw what the hell so you ride?

Same with my dads supercharged triumph rocket 3 350bhp drains the tank like it's got a leak 😄

Probably johnny was too excited for this and forgot to go through the edit

... or it was done on purpose.

Exactly what I was thinking. At first I was like "he forgot to change the text", but then I realized that it's really just an air pump, and being non-electric, it is technically "brushless", so you have to give it to him.

Oh that was done on purpose allright ! Quite funny actually ! 👍

it might of being the starter motor.

just think there are full sized warships powered by 747 sized engines and that was the fuel use for a little one, how many tons of fuel an hour do you think a ship uses?

Fuel Consumption: 310 ml/min / 10.5 oz/min @ 90% Power 112,500 RPM 😎

What would it look like if Johnny builds a custom afterburner as well :)

Like 5 years kid is drinking juice

faster than 84 Bronco

Right? Who just starts up a model turbine engine on their roof? I would have gone to get more fuel so we could run it again.

Consume much fuel.

Yeah. I would've lost my mind... Cool as hell!

The noise, the smell, who needs a holiday with one of these for your amusement. women take second place.

Hell yeah uninvited jumping the fence with the beers and the guitar

Actually, that was funny 😂

*spits out maple syrup*

because of all the revolutions they had to endure with their colonies?

as a french human being I can only approve this

This comment deserves a high form of commendation.

Lmao

Hairfrier more like it

😫🤮😫🤮😫😀😫😀🤮😫🤮🤮😫

U crack me up lool

🦀🦀✌🦀🦀

You don't need this video to test your speakers lol just download frequency changer from the iOS store or Google play store

on my tv setup I hear a lot of aliasing near Nyquist frequency. This thing must be way more impressive in real life hearing it.

Matt P what yo using

I really wish I didnt get high quality headphones, these go up to 22khz and it hurts so damn bad

BiC MC you can hear up to 22khz? Either you’re really young or have excellent ears. Most people top out between 18-20khz. Older people even struggle with 16khz. Btw even the cheapest headphones normally are able to reproduce much higher frequencies, some up to 70khz. Especially when they use balanced armature drivers instead dynamic drivers. You’re just not able to hear them. And the frequency graph definitely isn’t flat anymore at these high frequencies, nonetheless they can reproduce them.

Graeme Patterson True!! thats wot i did!. 😀😀👌👋

@@knightman4574 so do i haha

Thatd me

*lathe

Lay the is a moon in kerbal

@@korybabinski4159 yep i know got a little confused there😂

Build a jet engine why these three simple steps! Step 1: Own $20k worth of machine tools!

@@korybabinski4159 No, Laythe is a moon in Kerbal.

if its a perfect round cylinder like this jet engine at what angle do you stay 45 degrees from LOL its a round object that will will explode in 360 degrees lmfao better to use a barrier!

@@rvlifestylelivin Are you trolling? Consider the shaft axis as reference, the center of the turbine body as origin. Commissioning personel should stay on the line that, starting from the origin, makes 45 degrees with the shaft. If the turbine explodes, shrapnel flies 360 *radially*. Or it flies axially. So you shouldn't be on the side or ends of an operating gas engine.

That was my first thought. I did an apprenticeship at a grinder machine manufacturer and was qualified to change wheels on cylindrical and surface grinding machines. The first thing they teach you is never stand in line with the wheel when you first switch it on.

This is smazing

Some very good tips

It really does give you wings

@@BierBart12 more like thrust

Yes

No, Red Bull doesn't do anything, you need a Monster or a Rock Star or you're wasting your money. Red Bull doesn't have Ginseng, but the other two do.

Ginseng gives you wings

You're god damn right.

That's for sure. My 2.3L drank fuel like hell, screamed like a turbine on the expressway and produced almost nothing in return. It was dogshit on wheels.

@@mikeburch2998 At leat 5.2 had a great sound and a decent acceleration. But now i got the 3.0 diesel one which is alot better in fuel consumption .

Well, it about 0,1-0,3 kg/s or if you prefer 0,8-0,24 liter/s (more ore less), but it's strictly depends ond the amount of air goes in the turbogas.

A pilot I used to know told me an F-14 tomcat burned $30,000 and hr worth of jet fuel, and that wasn't using afterburner that was just cruising!

A 747 Burns 5 tons of kerosene a hour 👌

I work on KC-135s. They are an aerial refueler. Standard rampload at my base is 75,000 pounds of fuel. 13,400 pounds in each wing tank which is where the engines are fed the fuel from. Jets didn’t land with the same amount of fuel everytime but typically after a 5 hour flight you could expect anywhere from 2-4,000 pounds in each wing tank. That can give you an idea. 4,000 pounds of fuel would be roughly 600 gallons and 13,400 pounds would be 2000 gallons so that’s 1400 gallons of fuel per tank in 5 hours.

@@dreaded_pegasus6578 good job on OpSec...

I thought that was brilliant...

That was exactly my thought process when i read that. I was like thats not a brushless pump, then immediately thought to myself "Well actually i guess that it technically is a brushless pump".

@@scz71man but yes

pretty much, brushless air pump

I thought that was a mistake but then thought hmmm, perhaps not. 😜

One striking difference between piston engines and jets is that on a piston engine the oil pump is big and the fuel pump is small, while for a jet it's the opposite.

Imagine the greed for fuel of large engines on jet air liners

i not into manufactoring, is what you said a joke or are you serious? metal harvest doesnt sould real

@@garrettnino5137 naaa it's because the aluminum extrusion part that he is using are 20*20mm, and are so refered to "2020 aluminium extrusion", the joke being that 2020 would refer to the year instead of the dimensions. If you wonder, no 20*19mm aluminium extrusion doesn't exist to the extend of my knowledge (well it could be made obviously)

Garrett Nino r/woooooooooooooosh

it's r/woooosh if the user didn't even think it could be a joke

I will still use 2019 though. I heard that 2020 crap can burn your house, kill your neighbours and lock you down at home for two weeks.

The angular momentum of the compressor blades is 600 times as much force as the thrust. Imagine if it had a 10 kilogram flywheel.

@@timhallas4275 I'm sorry but that doesn't make any sense. Angular momentum has different dimensions than force.

Agree, that is why I wouldn't stand next to it with my thigh right in line with the rotating compressor blades.

Smaller RC engines require a lot of RPM. When you buy larger than this the Max RPM goes down, while Power goes up.

Like this high powered engine has top RPM of 50K modelaircraftcompany.com/newshop/en/micro-jet-turbines/854-amt-lynx-turbine-with-1569-kg-1569-n-352-lbs-thrust.html This small one has 245K - modelaircraftcompany.com/newshop/en/home/74-jetcat-p20-sx.html

Airliners use ton for fuel unit... So..

Diesel?

Yeah, gas engines have a huge fuel consumption... Now imagine a afterburner combined with that gas engine.

Something that makes the mig-29 look fuel efficient

Terrain, terrain.

"ROLL LEFT!"... beep beep "Flightcontrolls".

@the end... "Bingo fuel"

just pop the TAWS and TCAS breakers... job done!

Whoop whoop

“Don’t worry dear, it probably just ran out of fuel”

Dyson never made anything that worked.

@@DrWhom their vacuums sucked

Not loud enough.

"okay R&D team...i think y'all need a vacation"

Jeff Bezos tried their first product

However, imagine if the drill was propelled by a jet engine 😎 Soooo much difference to the dentist appointment 😁

@@chukwow5738 except a dental drill can reach 800,000 rpm

Lushin187 oshit

😂😂😂

@@Lushin187 Wait they put that in my MOUTH?????

I had a 1977 Cadillac Eldorado that had a similar Gallons Per Hour thirst...

@@microbuilder Did you measure fuel effeciency in tons per hour? You almost have to in those old land yachts.

just think ... an f18 ... has lets say 10,000 gallons of fuel on board ... thats only a few minutes of flight time ... NOT dog fight time either .. just basic high efficiency flight time ... what you saw going into the engine was about comparable ... the trade offs in a jet engine include fuel consumption over thrust as well ... going fast and hauling weight take lots of fuel .. so you make a compromise on how fast you want to use fuel ... with full sized engines they have many settings that can be adjusted for best fuel use at most operating levels ... BUT ... an RC jet doesnt have that ... it has a basic engine set to a moderate compromise of fuel use to useful power ... if you can compress the incoming air more or chill it ... then have a better fuel air mixer ... you would increase the power out of the engine and lower fuel consumption ... BUT at the cost of more weight .. . so if you made thunderbird 2 ... you would need about 5 gallons of fuel just to get 15 minutes of flight time .. with 2 engines ... BUT it would be about 6 feet long ... and not light by any means ;)

Power to weight ratio is better than an IC engine, but the tradeoff is fuel consumption.

Shawn Exactly. Maybe he meant 10,000 pounds of fuel?

I was thinking of the first jet engine tests with layers of plexiglass and concrete between the testing scientists and the engine, lmao

Let's be real, he just bought a jet engine and rigged it up, no real invention here

@@gabe8168 go watch his other videos then

@@gabe8168 clearly haven’t seen his other videos

Ever heard of the Chrysler Turbine cars?

@@casualcomputing6064 Whaaatt? No way! I want one right now! lol

@@OmarDelawar they're actually really cool things! Unfortunately, they didn't make many, and most were scrapped, but if you want to see one in action, Jay Leno has one

Was that the song in “Top Gun”?

@@chukwow5738 Yes, yes it was

Highway of Death? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highway_of_Death

Thanks

His engine is much bigger

@@mindprobe3587 and much smaller)

Especially for something made of scrap, without tools

What's sound of aliasing

It's an artifact of a frequency exceeding the Nyquist frequency, which is equal to half the number of samples per second of the recording. You see the same effect when a car's wheel spokes appear to reverse direction in camera footage, as each spoke turns more than enough per frame to appear in the place of another spoke. When the harmonic frequencies of the quickly rotating fans exceed the Nyquist frequency, you can hear the aliasing artifact, which is a new frequency with a pitch "reflected" off the top end of the frequency spectrum, so it appears to be descending in pitch even as the RPM increases.

@@DavenH I knew that

Походу аудитория кочует с канала на канал )). Чтобы видосики без перерыва смотреть. Игорь пока сильно впереди, примерно на длину корпуса АИ-25

Искал такой коммент))

Тоже при распаковке в видео слышите "да это просто роскошь какая-то"?))))

Местный автор конечно пряморукий, но до Негоды ему далековато пока

@@MidasBetankor нужно его в гаражный кооператив имени Негоды отправить для обмена опытом

Вот только Johny хотел написать про Негоду )) В Ростове масштабы побольше будут. И есть чееерррннаяяя пирамииидаа.. ))