Is SpaceX's Raptor engine the king of rocket engines?

  Переглядів 5,151,563

Everyday Astronaut

Everyday Astronaut

День тому

00:00 - Intro
02:55 - Basic physics of rocket engines
06:10 - Rocket engine cycles
20:30 - Rocket fuel comparison
30:40 - Raptor vs other rocket engines
44:05 - Summary
Article version - everydayastronaut.com/?p=9823...
SpaceX's new raptor engine is a methane fueled full flow staged combustion cycle engine and its so hard to develop, no engine like this has ever flown before!
Now this topic can be really intimidating so in order to bring the Raptor engine into context, we’re going to do an overview of a few common types of rocket engine cycles then compare the Raptor to a few other common rocket engines, like SpaceX’s current work horse, the Merlin, The Space Shuttle’s RS-25, the RD-180, Blue Origin’s BE-4 and the F-1 engine.
And if that’s not enough, not only is SpaceX using a crazy engine cycle, they’re also going to be using Liquid Methane as their fuel, again something that no orbital rocket has ever used! So we’ll also go over the unique characteristics of liquid methane as a rocket fuel and see if we can figure out why SpaceX went with Methane for the Raptor engine.
We'll also break down and explain all the different engine cycle types so you know what the full flow staged combustion cycle is, how it works, and how it compares to the other cycles.
So by the end of this video hopefully we’ll have the context to know why the raptor engine is special, how it compares to other rocket engines, why it’s using methane and hopefully find out if the Raptor engine will be the new king of rocket engines…
-----------------------------------------------
Rocket engine renders by @MartianDays / martiandays
F-1 Turbopump photo provided by Mike Jetzer/heroicrelics.org
HUGE thanks to my Moon Walker Patreon supporters! Blake Jacobs, Eli Burton, Jethro, Mac Malkawi, Neurostream, Ole Mathias Heggem
Want to support what I do? Consider becoming a Patreon supporter for access to exclusive livestreams, our discord channel and subreddit! - / everydayastronaut
The best place for all your space merch needs!
everydayastronaut.com/shop/
All music is original! Check out my album "Maximum Aerodynamic Pressure" anywhere you listen to music (Spotify, iTunes, Google Play, Amazon, etc) or click here for easy links - everydayastronaut.com/music
I'm the cohost of an awesome podcast where we talk all about current technologies and how they shape our future! ourludicrousfuture.com or here on UKposts / ourludicrousfuture

КОМЕНТАРІ: 8 000
@VulpeculaJoy
@VulpeculaJoy 5 років тому
There are people that try to stretch a 1min topic into 15min to gain more watch time and then there is cramming a 3 hour lecture on ROCKET SCIENCE into 49 minutes...
@carefulpolarbear
@carefulpolarbear 5 років тому
I hate 'Now You Know' channel for stretching his videos.
@andrewzhang1290
@andrewzhang1290 5 років тому
Amar Khandve bright side too, they are all and channels you shouldn’t watch, and not just because they stretch their videos
@CookingWithCows
@CookingWithCows 4 роки тому
@@andrewzhang1290 The problem is that videos of less than 10 minutes are not considered as much by the youtube algorithm. It's Google's fault for forcing people to make 10min+ videos or risk disappearing from feeds (even of people who already subscribed!). If youtube is your income, you better do what you need to survive and not get drowned out by the masses of content uploaded each day.
@My-Opinion-Doesnt-Matter
@My-Opinion-Doesnt-Matter 4 роки тому
More like 5 min of kindergarten rocket science stretched to 49 minutes.
@befer
@befer 4 роки тому
@@CookingWithCows UKposts is simply a platform for people to upload videos. It's purely UKpostsr's fault to stretch his videos sacrificing quality
@alrightydave
@alrightydave 3 роки тому
Absolutely incredible. I’m speechless. Can’t believe I actually just watched this video on UKposts for free...
@Kevin-jb2pv
@Kevin-jb2pv 3 роки тому
Wait, what? You got this for free? What the hell, Tim?
@brianrufh3684
@brianrufh3684 3 роки тому
Haha this an excellent video. Wouldn't have paid for it though.
@JayPixx
@JayPixx 3 роки тому
Wtf is wrong with you people? Why everyone keeps saying that. And they are saying that more and more often every day. WTF?! Do you really want UKposts to shift to paid platform? I mean it - UKposts is already WAY more commercials rich than ever before. 💰 just keep reminding them how ready you are to pay them.. F**k sake... Can't you just admit that particular author of the video is great and is making great content, period? What is wrong with you people 💲 💵 💸
@mastershooter64
@mastershooter64 3 роки тому
@@JayPixx chill dude, he didn't go and tell youtube to make every video paid stop overreacting also, are you high?
@JayPixx
@JayPixx 3 роки тому
@@mastershooter64 the thing is, it's not about him (as I stated clearly in my comment). It's about general "trend", call it anyway you want, that people are putting this comments under every long, good quality video. Come on, seriously?
@bennybooboobear3940
@bennybooboobear3940 3 роки тому
Me before the video: “gosh 50 mins? Better be good.” Me after the video: “gosh 50 mins? Why so short?”
@fille0078
@fille0078 3 роки тому
u illigal its 49:01
@pedrobreyner7204
@pedrobreyner7204 3 роки тому
@@fille0078 49:02
@flamu9183
@flamu9183 2 роки тому
@@fille0078 Are you 5 years old?
@fille0078
@fille0078 2 роки тому
@@flamu9183 ehh no. what my spelling? well im from Sweden. so if thats the case then you judged a book by its cover?
@HoHhoch
@HoHhoch Рік тому
The fact that the F-1 holds up as well as it does despite how old it is speaks volumes about the sheer engineering that went into the Saturn V. Truly a beautiful craft that I hope will always be remembered in this new era of spaceflight ushered in by SpaceX and beyond.
@grizbizusa
@grizbizusa Рік тому
Very well said. Bravo.
@johnabsher6518
@johnabsher6518 3 місяці тому
Didn't the center engine on Apollo 13 shut off?
@Gaming1Doge
@Gaming1Doge 2 місяці тому
I mean, the F-1 did have 2 total military fundings, the first was for ICBMs, and the second for Apollo. So it's numbers are insane in even more ways, sadly that also includes price.
@phye5063
@phye5063 5 років тому
It's so good to hear "we'll talk more about that in a second" than "we'll talk more about that in the next video"
@tomanderson848
@tomanderson848 4 роки тому
This is what I was hoping the internet would be. Thanks for your hard work!
@capo_di_capi
@capo_di_capi 4 роки тому
you still use the Matrix screensaver?
@SemGabelko
@SemGabelko 4 роки тому
There is no internet, Neo
@prospectorratgmailcom
@prospectorratgmailcom 3 роки тому
Thank you AlGore! (snicker)
@gregsworldkitchen6764
@gregsworldkitchen6764 3 роки тому
Ditto
@mq-9reaperdrone530
@mq-9reaperdrone530 3 роки тому
The fact that this is free to watch is insane. Excellent work!
@solventtrapdotcom6676
@solventtrapdotcom6676 2 роки тому
I'm so old, I remember when TV was educational...
@longerino
@longerino 2 роки тому
I'm guessing you owe a lot of money.
@skankhunt9078
@skankhunt9078 Рік тому
It's not free you watch a ton of ads
@IceColdProfessional
@IceColdProfessional 9 місяців тому
Stop mentioning it. You're giving Google ideas for monetization.
@rabidbeaver167
@rabidbeaver167 8 місяців тому
Lol stfu its youtube.
@briansmobile1
@briansmobile1 2 роки тому
BAM!!! That's a high grade script, animation and delivery! Well done!
@supazt
@supazt 2 роки тому
Q
@silas-the-person3895
@silas-the-person3895 2 роки тому
Q
@madintheheid
@madintheheid 2 роки тому
Agreed. If only he could learn when to use 'there are', instead of 'there's', and stop using 'literally' when there is no literal reference, then I'd stop questioning if the rest of it is based on wrong assumptions.
@CSpottsGaming
@CSpottsGaming 2 роки тому
@@madintheheid Imagine disregarding the entirety of an hour long video about literal rocket science because you don't understand that language changes over time.
@justrelax3012
@justrelax3012 4 роки тому
This is probably one of the best videos on rockets I have ever seen. The amount of information you crammed into 49 minutes is crazy. Thanks!
@Reach3DPrinters
@Reach3DPrinters 4 роки тому
Decidedly so. :)
@ChristianTreber
@ChristianTreber 4 роки тому
That was 49mins? Yikes... but speaks for the content!
@deeas6518
@deeas6518 4 роки тому
Everyday Astronaut has a high information density compared to other videos
@ps200306
@ps200306 4 роки тому
Insanely great production, including the animations and footage. Just as a general comment on the growing quality of the better youtube channels ... it's the clearest indicator yet that the end is nigh for broadcast TV. On TV this would be dumbed down to moronic levels, while advertisers would be scattergun-blasting to a dwindling and fragmented audience.
@radiofreealbemuth8540
@radiofreealbemuth8540 4 роки тому
Falcon Heavy yep. Amazing quality.
@ob0273
@ob0273 4 роки тому
Me: "I'm definitely not going to watch the whole video" *49 mins 1 sec later* "Ups.."
@TheDevilWAH
@TheDevilWAH 4 роки тому
I was a bit like that, "I'll just see how this starts..... "
@benheinz8817
@benheinz8817 4 роки тому
Yeah, same.
@arandomcrusaderonjerusalem5840
@arandomcrusaderonjerusalem5840 4 роки тому
I watched it
@MonsoonEast
@MonsoonEast 4 роки тому
I came to the end and was like "What, he can't be done already!"... Really looking forward to more!
@David-fg4nu
@David-fg4nu 4 роки тому
For real tho. I’m supposed to wake up at 6:30 and it’s 2:30. RIP
@carteretherington6700
@carteretherington6700 3 роки тому
Best 49 minutes I've ever spent!
@carlatteniese2
@carlatteniese2 Рік тому
This is the second time I am watching this; I am slowly educating myself (or NASA and others are educating me at You Tube) in orbital mechanics and you are educating me in rocketry--for starters. I also want to complement you in the way you present. As an ESL instructor in Asia for nearly 20 years, I understand the challenge of explaining ideas to people which are complex--in your case, because it's rocket science, in mine, because I only use English--and my point is, you have a way of talking that is clear, emotional (difference in voice pitch and expression delineates concepts more easily than in monotone--the way many science teachers speak)--and you repeat, Tim, which is essential. I could probably help you with the writing; maybe when I have extra cash, I will join on Patreon and give ideas. But, thank you, and excellent job. Your knowledge alone earns you a valuable seat on the Dear Moon flight. Congrats on that! You deserve it.
@williamtsmith9668
@williamtsmith9668 6 місяців тому
Thank you for your service in ESL. 🤠
@franksqrow6717
@franksqrow6717 4 роки тому
I'm retired from a technical career. Over the years it was clear, whenever I was given a technical briefing on a subject I was unfamiliar with, and the person giving the briefing was unable to adequately explain the subject in "layman's" terms, it indicated that the person doing the briefing did not truly understand the technology. It is obvious that that is not the case here. Excellent orientation! Very impressive!
@E-Kat
@E-Kat 3 роки тому
"just read the instructions"!
@effexon
@effexon 3 роки тому
@@E-Kat rolf
@subscriber6181
@subscriber6181 3 роки тому
Or s/he was Dyslexic
@subscriber6181
@subscriber6181 3 роки тому
@@MFKR696 Actually, technical careers are some of the best careers for Dyslexics. Dyslexics also make up a whopping 25% of CEOs. So, it's safe to assume that they could easily be Dyslexic.
@craigrmeyer
@craigrmeyer 3 роки тому
“If we can’t explain something to undergraduates then we don’t really understand it ourselves.” -Richard Feynman (paraphrased)
@Aaron7075
@Aaron7075 4 роки тому
As an aerospace engineering student, I can say that some of this video is basically a sophomore class, but the real propulsion stuff, that’s straight up senior year content, this video is a senior year Aerospace engineering lecture. Here’s the classes you hit on: Intro to Aerospace Engineering 2 Thermodynamics Propulsion Advanced space propulsion
@Aaron7075
@Aaron7075 4 роки тому
THE Ohio State University lol
@jplflyer
@jplflyer 4 роки тому
Given that most of the people watching this aren't aerospace engineers, I thought it was perfect.
@__-fm5qv
@__-fm5qv 4 роки тому
I mean in class the maths of everything is done too, but the concepts are here pretty well.
@SgtSayWhat
@SgtSayWhat 4 роки тому
I'm at Swansea University and I'd say this was a nice summary of a view of the early lectures in my Rocket and Space Technology module in 2nd year. Great video, really well presented!
@__-fm5qv
@__-fm5qv 4 роки тому
@@SgtSayWhat Hey fellow swansea student! :D I graduated last year.
@darnellarford2439
@darnellarford2439 3 роки тому
This video is a timeless work of art. I plan on watching it many more times. Thank you so much for making it.
@MrGrace
@MrGrace 3 роки тому
I would just like to say that I appreciate the production value of your videos. You make it easy to follow along, even though you're explaining highly complicated topics to lesser thinkers like me lol
@jb0433628
@jb0433628 5 років тому
Upvoted because for the first time ever I heard an understandable description of specific impulse.
@jerry3790
@jerry3790 5 років тому
Is this video the king of everyday astronaut videos?
@JamesCutts22
@JamesCutts22 5 років тому
Yes for sure
@kerbonautics5217
@kerbonautics5217 5 років тому
So overall, this video is the king for this application.
@phil4826
@phil4826 5 років тому
Kudos to Tim. He's really studied hard and has come up to speed on rocket technology. He's now a good resource on the topic and is entertaining at the same time.
@ke6gwf
@ke6gwf 5 років тому
@@SpaceReportNews Or, just getting started! SpaceX sucks at making long form videos, Elon needs to use Tim to channel his inner space geek
@firexgodx980
@firexgodx980 5 років тому
It not only has the highest information density, but it's also the longest ever video he's ever produced so yes
@larsholland1879
@larsholland1879 2 роки тому
I just discovered your channel. Thank you for the deep dives. I have learn a ton from you over the past week or so. Keep up the great work
@SpeedemonR1
@SpeedemonR1 3 роки тому
Brilliant explanation of the different types of rockets in a simplistic yet informative manner. Great work, looking forward to seeing the future of rocket development thru your eyes.
@dongurudebro4579
@dongurudebro4579 5 років тому
Ok i must say you have surpassed yourself , a very complex subject simple explained and visualized! Great Job, probably the best video of you yet!
@theanonymous393
@theanonymous393 5 років тому
Ich: klicke auf ein Everyday Astronaut Video Sehe Don Guru de Bro & Paul Paulson als Top Comment Checke ob ich mich nicht verklickt hab und bei PietSmiet gelandet bin :D
@matthysk1479
@matthysk1479 5 років тому
Yes agreed! Great video💪🏻💪🏻
@cymrych79
@cymrych79 5 років тому
Agreed! Wish I could punch the "Like" button a couple dozen more times. Excellent video.
@gamefrySE
@gamefrySE 5 років тому
Came here to say the same thing. Incredibly well researched but easy to understand. One of the best videos he's done!
@rfrnet1
@rfrnet1 4 роки тому
Wow! Great video.
@ceeyloc
@ceeyloc 5 років тому
Best 48:45 mins:secs that I've spent in 67 yrs. Well done!
@rafaelsanson3124
@rafaelsanson3124 Рік тому
All the time and effort put in this video is insane. GREAT WORK!
@michaelpal7641
@michaelpal7641 3 роки тому
And lastly-This video is truly one of the greatest videos on the Internet!
@txetxurodriguez
@txetxurodriguez 5 років тому
Man, this video has a LOT or work behind. Thank you Tim.
@vaibhavpoke8357
@vaibhavpoke8357 5 років тому
That honestly didn't feel like 49 minutes. This was so interesting and well done. Keep it up Tim. We really appreciate it.
@Andytlp
@Andytlp 4 роки тому
just watch at 2x its like 24:30 min video bro.
@snuffeldjuret
@snuffeldjuret 5 місяців тому
I remember watching this thinking the raptor numbers were aspirational that would never be achieve. Boy was I wrong, we are already past those.
@chucks2k
@chucks2k 3 роки тому
By far your best effort yet. Thanks so much for your easily digestible treatment of these complex engines.
@ralph17p
@ralph17p 3 роки тому
You know, when people say "it's not rocket science", I hadn't realised the bar was quite that high.
@MaxMustermann-bm7qt
@MaxMustermann-bm7qt 3 роки тому
Ralph Pickering i’ve heard in rocket science you say
@youfreaker
@youfreaker 3 роки тому
It seems way more difficult because people don't come across the information in regular life so everything is completely new. I mean you can show a person a simple scientific formula, e.g. to calculate the average, and most people still wouldn't understand it
@uropygid
@uropygid 3 роки тому
@@MaxMustermann-bm7qt Oh my goodness! Rocket science is so simple compared to music theory. I can read music and play guitar. Still I have almost no comprehension of music theory in general, and guitar theory in particular.
@not1but2and37
@not1but2and37 3 роки тому
I saw what you did there.
@joethomasld
@joethomasld 3 роки тому
👏🏻
@hoedoe5981
@hoedoe5981 3 роки тому
Me at first : 49 mins ?!!! Me after 49mins : "Definitely worth it"
@davidmendoza4387
@davidmendoza4387 3 роки тому
true
@jeffersonolac7112
@jeffersonolac7112 3 роки тому
very true😁
@DaBaldEagul
@DaBaldEagul 3 роки тому
Before: so long?! After: so short? :c
@Hi-do6fo
@Hi-do6fo 3 роки тому
+2 seconds
@TheRadioactiveBanana32
@TheRadioactiveBanana32 3 роки тому
i was about to skip but got carried away
@user-wo2ny7ym4l
@user-wo2ny7ym4l 3 роки тому
38:11 As for current time, seems Merlin engine has proven at least 10 times reusability with real flights, after 10th launch of B1051
@abzy2470
@abzy2470 Рік тому
March 2023 booster 1058 15 launches 15 landings
@brain82862
@brain82862 4 місяці тому
December 23rd, 2023. Booster 1058 has completed 19 launches and 19 landings.
@gregderise9969
@gregderise9969 2 роки тому
Amazing work on a complex topic. Fanatically educating. Really appreciated the quality of your production and script. Great work. I know you put a lot of effort into, first learning the details of the cycles, but also then gathering all the information together on the different rocket engines and putting into tabular and graphical form to help us understand. Your enthusiasm showed through. Your explanation is next level excellent for people approaching this topic for the first time. I found this interesting and completely engaging to watch. BTW I was in high school during the Apollo program, living only 40 miles from the NASA test facility in Mississippi. I got to see an S-1 stage test firing, full duration of those incredibly deafening F-1 engines, from one mile away with the press. The sound pressure rocked the NASA bus from side to side. I chipped my hands around a friend’s ear and shouted instructions from one inch away at the top of my lungs on the photography we were doing. He was unable to hear me. The legs of the slacks I was wearing were flapping as if a wind was hitting them. It was completely calm. The flame shooting sideways out of the flame bucket was a few stories High and I guessed about 700’ long horizontally. It was wickedly ferocious looking. It’s been a little over half a century now but I’m still impressed by my memory of it. I later flew down to the cape and watched the final flight of Apollo, Apollo 17, lift off at night from 10 miles away. We could barely hear it by comparison at that distance, but it lit the sky up like a sunrise. After staging with the hydrogen burning second stage engines, it looked like a breeding start moving rapidly through the constellations. Many years later, during the Shuttle program, I saw one reentering the atmosphere late at night from Gulfport Mississippi heading south to fly over the Gulf of Mexico toward Florida at an altitude of 35 miles at a speed of 5000 mph. I got that information the next day via a phone call to the Johnson Space Center. It looked like an orange meteor with a long white tail of ionized gas. It casts moving shadow under a bright streetlight. Two minutes after it faded out over the Gulf I heard a characteristic double sonic boom. I never saw it launched though I drove down to KSC and waited once. I never had another proper opportunity. Hopefully the SLS will become a flying vehicle one day, assuming a lot of things, and I can go see it. I have a much longer way to go to beer there these days. I now live in Iowa, only about 2-1/2 hours south of you! SRBs are very very bright. I saw the launch of Voyager 2 in 1977 from 4 miles away on a tour bus on a sunny summer Saturday. It like looking at two Suns, the pair of solid rocket boosters strapped on the Titan rocket. Of course those were much smaller than the ones on the Space Shuttle and what will be on the SLS. I’m looking forward to seeing if I can get as close or closer to a launch and get “blinded” by the light. We’ll see…🤷🏼‍♂️(Wow WOW would I like to see a full up flight of Starship some day too. That would be incredible. The noise!)
@albertcaro6191
@albertcaro6191 4 роки тому
This is a contender for best video on youtube for the year. Astonishingly good
@bennoz2
@bennoz2 4 роки тому
@Gmail X lol... russian botttttt
@awuma
@awuma 4 роки тому
@Gmail X I often imagine that Elon Musk is Sergei Pavlovich reincarnated...
@bennoz2
@bennoz2 4 роки тому
@Gmail X OK comrade... hahaha
@bennoz2
@bennoz2 4 роки тому
@Gmail X "and is triumph of marketing" and "you must educate yourself moron" is a double negative and cancelled each other out... one of us need to get an education Comrade... 🤭
@bennoz2
@bennoz2 4 роки тому
@Gmail X Trump.... lol not my problem bro...
@Nayte08
@Nayte08 4 роки тому
Amazing how you were not only able to inform me of the basics of rocket engines, but you kept my attention for the entirety of the video. Tough thing to do these days, absolutely wonderful video.
@TheAefril
@TheAefril 4 роки тому
Totally agree with you, and well put Nathan!
@thatjeff7550
@thatjeff7550 4 роки тому
I had to cheat and boost the speed of the vid to 1.25%.
@alekseimarianov3388
@alekseimarianov3388 2 роки тому
Tim, do I need to mention how much we appreciate your work and especially the consistent use of metric system? Thank you!
@rolliebca
@rolliebca 4 місяці тому
Now this is a fantastic video! Thank you for your efforts. Very well done. Cheers.
@stefanblack3909
@stefanblack3909 5 років тому
The professors in my aerospace engineering program didnt deliver this info a 10th as well as you have. And this video was free, where as my degree... was not.
@nicolacornolti7796
@nicolacornolti7796 4 роки тому
@Cosmonauteable mhhh okay, but you're saying he could have learned it by himself without going to school. This means the teacher was not good anyways
@Ernomouse
@Ernomouse 4 роки тому
I don't think any given professor has five months to prepare for a single lesson. Sure, he should know his field in general, but consider this: how do you keep up with the fast pace of science if you have to teach students, plan lessons and correct tests and essays full-time? While you would also love to advance your own research?
@CookingWithCows
@CookingWithCows 4 роки тому
And how does your free youtube history do when applying for a job?
@RandomNumber141
@RandomNumber141 4 роки тому
Try putting your UKposts history on a job application.
@stefanblack3909
@stefanblack3909 4 роки тому
@@RandomNumber141 try making an original comment
@mithiraudugama800
@mithiraudugama800 5 років тому
Wow super interesting video man. Didn't even felt it's 50 mins. Thank you
@germanher7528
@germanher7528 5 років тому
+1!
@stormsurge1
@stormsurge1 4 роки тому
*didn't feel
@NaenaeGaming
@NaenaeGaming 4 роки тому
Wait it’s 50 minutes? I’ve only just started watching...
@davemwangi05
@davemwangi05 4 роки тому
I wondered how it ended fast. I often get tired of 5 minute videos. Not this one though.
@aw195
@aw195 4 роки тому
It wasn't 50 mins
@gango4436
@gango4436 2 роки тому
Thank you so much brother , this simplified explanation was so great for me . Keep going 🔥
@5h3rmn
@5h3rmn 3 роки тому
As a father, I lost it at the “fathom” remark. Well done. 👏🏻
@peacenow42
@peacenow42 4 роки тому
People like this are a gift to the world because there is so much to teach and learn now and they help us put it all into the right context while making us curious to know more.
@nicolasmatthys1548
@nicolasmatthys1548 4 роки тому
totally right!
@radiofreealbemuth8540
@radiofreealbemuth8540 4 роки тому
Yep
@gerardcollins1767
@gerardcollins1767 3 роки тому
@@radiofreealbemuth8540 methane power is way to go ,tried it sitting on leather seat lifted me up lucky did not ignite it.
@scottmanley
@scottmanley 5 років тому
No. Because raptors commonly optimize for small agile males and larger females able to carry more. Thus, they would be queens. Good job on those animations!
@Aarlington
@Aarlington 5 років тому
Spot on.
@christianpattison8238
@christianpattison8238 5 років тому
Scott , you had to be that guy “ ACTUALLY “, 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣. And Actually you are correct. BTW really enjoy your work
@stanislavzoldak2198
@stanislavzoldak2198 4 роки тому
Scott, you are the daddest dad to ever dad.
@mwnciboo
@mwnciboo 4 роки тому
Clever girl....
@SternLX
@SternLX 4 роки тому
Are we talking avian or reptilian here? There are raptors in both families.
@willhofner6903
@willhofner6903 3 роки тому
I've never felt more drawn to join a patreon for a yt channel than I am for this one. Truly inspiring stuff
@spencerjensen1993
@spencerjensen1993 2 роки тому
Seriously one of my favorite videos on the platform. A close second is drachinifel’s video about navy ship boilers.
@jarno_de_wit
@jarno_de_wit 5 років тому
And I was just about to go to sleep......... I would have stayed up for 2 hours if the video had been that long. This was just amazing.
@robertgable2544
@robertgable2544 4 роки тому
I started the video, fell asleep, slept for 10 hours, woke up, and finished the video.
@zachm4635
@zachm4635 5 років тому
Never clicked so fast. been waiting ever since you announced it on OLF.
@MS-dp3py
@MS-dp3py 5 років тому
OLF FTW, Its a great podcast.
@CKalitin
@CKalitin 5 років тому
It surprises me how little people watch/listen to OLF. Only ~15k!
@zachm4635
@zachm4635 5 років тому
Blah Cga our ludicrous future. Look it up as our ludicrous future it’s a podcast with joe Scott(answers with joe), Tim(everydayastronuaght), and Ben sullins(teslanomics)
@SWard7292
@SWard7292 2 роки тому
Great video. Didn’t know if I could sit through a 45 minute UKposts video, but it was so well done and so much good information presented so well. Thank you for putting the time and effort into this.
@omgitsflying
@omgitsflying 3 роки тому
Amazingly well documented and presented. Fantastic
@albertopajuelomontes2066
@albertopajuelomontes2066 5 років тому
despite being 49 minutes long, I was enjoing it so much it felt really short.
@slimeking101
@slimeking101 5 років тому
5 freaking months for this? 100% worth it
@everydayspacenerd8192
@everydayspacenerd8192 2 роки тому
@Everyday Astronaut Best video yet! Very detailed and informative keep up the good work!
@gianlucanordio7200
@gianlucanordio7200 3 роки тому
Crazy how you can explain in a easy way such a hard matter, amazing video 🔥
@arturfraniuk1128
@arturfraniuk1128 5 років тому
This is what I call good journalism. Thank you Tim
@clausejoke1985
@clausejoke1985 5 років тому
That's not journalism that's shilling.
@jessiejanson1528
@jessiejanson1528 5 років тому
jou-na-li-sam... what is that? i havnt .. Oh.. Yes, now i remember, it was that thing the news did over 20 years ago where they presented facts on different subjects or investigated problems. Nice to see it existing, sadly never on the news channels, those just lies and clickbait BS...
@linecraftman3907
@linecraftman3907 4 роки тому
@@clausejoke1985 do you really think tim is getting paid by spacex to promote their rockets?
@clausejoke1985
@clausejoke1985 4 роки тому
@@linecraftman3907 I don't know, but he is definitely a victim of SpaceX's PR and hype. None of Musks companies has ever invented any groundbreaking/new technology. Landing is a maneuver not a technology, this should tell you everything you have to know about Musk and his companies. A lot of bullshit claims and promises, but no substance. Highest paid CEO but he is doing it for mankind.... dear god you guys are naive. www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/news/2019/04/02/tsla-median-pay-musk-compensation.html He is also a union busting drug addict and convicted fraud. Do you want me to stop now?
@linecraftman3907
@linecraftman3907 4 роки тому
@@clausejoke1985 it's not about inventing new technologies, it's about making it work in real life. Drug addict? People don't choose to be drug addicts most of the time. However I do agree about shady business practices and bad work conditions , but who is holding the workers in the companies?
@Elimino_P
@Elimino_P 5 років тому
Best animations detailing different engine types. Super good job!
@lizzylue92
@lizzylue92 2 роки тому
This helped me prepare for my spaceX interview! Thank you for your hard work!
@jesseharp2400
@jesseharp2400 Рік тому
This is so awesome so glad I found this channel thank you for doing what you do
@theologyrules6146
@theologyrules6146 4 роки тому
"Rocket science, like all things, is a complex set of compromises." -- best line of the whole video. One should not take lightly the expression, 'It's not rocket science.' again. Rocket science ought to be applied to every day thinking really. Balancing proportion, Goldilocks principle. Deep video. New sub.
@paulshedleski7063
@paulshedleski7063 5 років тому
Wow! So much information coming at just the right speed for comprehension, the time flew by! All in one video was the right call
@philflip1963
@philflip1963 2 роки тому
Just about the finest video I've seen you do, congrats!
@steveharris4296
@steveharris4296 2 роки тому
Tim, this is a masterpiece. Thank you so much! You are such a excellent teacher. All the best from NC.
@WillCocking04
@WillCocking04 3 роки тому
"So why did spacex use methane?" Thrust is blue and look cool
@xtremeownagedotcom
@xtremeownagedotcom 3 роки тому
blue flame go brrr
@NHAFFFF
@NHAFFFF 3 роки тому
It might be blue but it's the bomb
@Migger_29
@Migger_29 3 роки тому
I bet they got the idea while farting on matches.
@simonenarsson8978
@simonenarsson8978 3 роки тому
NHAFXD GLITCHER シ i got the reference 🥳
@chasepatesel7118
@chasepatesel7118 3 роки тому
Because we are able to produce it fairly easily, unlike hydrocarbons like traditional rocket fuel..if we find the right materials we could make it on Mars..
@Paul-iw9mb
@Paul-iw9mb 5 років тому
My sister asked me today to help her with a presentation about rocket engines, so this video came at exactly the right moment. It's really impressive how you managed to explain that deep topic with so much detail, but in a understandable way. Most videos about engines I know are to basic and don't go into so much detail. Amazing work putting this together! Thank you very much for this.
@otpyrcralphpierre1742
@otpyrcralphpierre1742 3 роки тому
I watch this video about once a month. It's still just as fascinating. Excellent work!
@iamarobotninja
@iamarobotninja Рік тому
Incredible amount of work put into this channel. Thank you
@JackLe1127
@JackLe1127 5 років тому
4:28 I like how you spent at least an hour blending their faces on the picture for just 3 seconds in the video.
@deshmukhshrut
@deshmukhshrut 4 роки тому
Einstein said time is relative, today I experienced it. Never felt 49:02 minutes pass so fast.
@AkashYadav-mr4hg
@AkashYadav-mr4hg 4 роки тому
were you travelling at the or near the speed of light ?
@jacekciszewski3889
@jacekciszewski3889 3 роки тому
You explain Rocket science in a way that I could say "It's not a rocket science dude! It's easy!" Great job! Please do more.
@josephsalomone
@josephsalomone 3 роки тому
You are the first person to make specific impulse make sense. Everyone else is just like, well it is in seconds because that's how the math works out.
@marcopohl4875
@marcopohl4875 2 роки тому
that's why I prefer Isaac Arthur's approach: specific impulse can go take a hike, exhaust velocity is way better!
@dwarvenmoray7019
@dwarvenmoray7019 2 роки тому
Because that's how mafia work.
@joshsvoss
@joshsvoss 2 роки тому
Hahahah
@andrew34765
@andrew34765 2 роки тому
The reason they use seconds is because the math works out to being the equivalent of "how many seconds would sea level gravity need to pull on the exhaust to counter its acceleration" If gravity is 9.8 m/s^2, then a fuel with an exhaust velocity of 980 meters per second would have a specific impulse of 100 seconds.
@josephsalomone
@josephsalomone 2 роки тому
@@andrew34765 I get that now, but no one ever explained that. And wikipedia wasn't much help either. People would stop their explanation at, that's just how the math works, and not go any further.
@zayedmohamed4063
@zayedmohamed4063 5 років тому
This was very well explained. The visualizations were very helpful.
@EngiTrek
@EngiTrek Рік тому
Excellent! When comparing fuels, it’s more appropriate to compare characteristic velocities as the specific impulse is dependent on engine architecture. Keep up the great work!
@vogslife2378
@vogslife2378 3 роки тому
8:06 "There are a few ways to start a gas generator engine but will be done in an another video" *video is literally almost an hour* that my friends is how complicated rocket science is, and it is not even the tip of the iceberg.
@josephpentony4804
@josephpentony4804 2 роки тому
And he only talks about engine cycles which use turbopumps
@josephpentony4804
@josephpentony4804 2 роки тому
@Carp Yes, but he doesn’t go into detail.
@josephpentony4804
@josephpentony4804 2 роки тому
@Carp Well, not really. He only mentions them briefly.
@Kyle-gw6qp
@Kyle-gw6qp 2 роки тому
Not really. If you look at any technical subject in depth, it'll take a large amount of time to cover.
@odie6789
@odie6789 3 роки тому
I feel like I should have earned college credits for this.
@SuperDave-vj9en
@SuperDave-vj9en 3 роки тому
You would pass the exam. Congratulations!
@BxBxProductions
@BxBxProductions 3 роки тому
I literally took a class on orbital physics and spaceflight and the math/calculations involved is soooooooo tedious. It isn't for everyone but it was worth it!
@drx1xym154
@drx1xym154 3 роки тому
They give some degrees out for less, these days! . Feelings! soooo woke?
@robh467
@robh467 3 роки тому
Somewhere between history and antique methods for propulsion.
@robh467
@robh467 3 роки тому
@@BxBxProductions welcome to modern academia. Okay, the student is finally ready to think freely and have original thought patterns. Let's see..... Dangit. Again, before we could unlock free thinking; the student died of old age.
@EverydayAstronaut
@EverydayAstronaut 5 років тому
Elon watched the video and provided some additional input in this tweet - twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1132386984444383233?s=20 "Great video. Couple notes: Raptor designed for subcooled CH4/O2, so propellant density & thrust increase up to ~8%, as needed for mission. 380 Isp & up to 50% thrust/weight improvement over time. Merlin thrust/weight doubled from V1, but Raptor is closer to optimum." and this one - twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1132389917722419200 "Propellant stays same, but almost everything else improves. Fundamental goal is minimize cost per ton to surface of Mars."
@MatterBeamTSF
@MatterBeamTSF 5 років тому
That's awesome! Does this mean the TWR increases to about 150?
@alexkorocencev7689
@alexkorocencev7689 5 років тому
If Elon is interested, you clearly did something right!
@oliverriall
@oliverriall 5 років тому
Do you think he watched the whole thing through? Probably on x2. Job offer from SpaceX not far behind.
@DrNemea
@DrNemea 5 років тому
Congratulations.. and Thank you for all your hard works and commitments 🙏
@casinivan
@casinivan 5 років тому
Amazing video! Took time but totally worth it. For future reference, this is the go to video for any rocket-engine related things
@rmatveev
@rmatveev 3 роки тому
Great video, Tim! Watched it twice with the same amount of joy!!!
@gregsworldkitchen6764
@gregsworldkitchen6764 3 роки тому
Thanks for putting the hard work in for this video. I had no idea that rocket fuel pumps were turbo powered. I'd assumed they were electric. Learned something new. Also very interesting were the difference in fuel properties and the explanation of why CH4 is a good compromise. Well worth the watch and those 49 mins flew buy.
@robsonhahn
@robsonhahn 5 років тому
Info #1 and #2 RD171 actually flew almost 100 times. Much more than F1 Also, the RD170 (differs from RD171 basically with relation to the gimbal direction) was able to achieve a peak pressure of 306,2bar at chamber pressure.
@TheBalefire
@TheBalefire 4 роки тому
I can fill in some of the knowledge on Metallurgy, if you are interested. Basically, the mechanism by which metals fail, or "yield," is by the propagation of imperfections in the crystal lattice. The imperfections are called "dislocations" and there are usually millions of them in any cubic millimeter of metal. Dislocations tend to move more easily as you raise the temperature of a metal, causing yield strengths to decrease with higher temperature. The methods of strengthening metals generally center around trying to halt the motion of these dislocations, either by adding alloy elements which tend to stabilize dislocations at the atomic level (such as adding carbon to steel), or by precipitating secondary phases (like small crystals within the crystal) which act as roadblocks to dislocation movement. Secondary phases are usually precipitated by raising the temperature of the metal and aging it for a certain duration. Aluminum is an example where this is very common. Metallurgists have determined the proper time and temperature to age metals to get the maximum strength. The longer you age, the larger the precipitates grow. If the precipitates are too small, dislocations cut through them. If they are too large, dislocations will bend around them. If you age at the wrong temperature, or the wrong combination of elements, precipitates will form along grain boundaries instead of inside crystal grains, which doesn't add strength, and can weaken the metal. Precipitates must be fairly small, and uniformly spread throughout the crystal in order to add strength to the metal Precipitation hardening is especially common in Aluminum alloys. Part of the reason aluminum is fine for airplane skins but not good for engines revolves around the fact that precipitation hardening is lost once you raise the temperature above a few hundred degrees, as the high temps will cause precipitates to grow, combine, and migrate to grain boundaries. You mentioned work-hardening of stainless steel. Work hardening is a mechanism where you basically limit dislocation movement by adding a whole lot more dislocations, and forcing them to move until they run into each other. By deforming the material, you push the dislocations until they start to stack up, which gives resistance to further propagation of dislocations. The downside of this is that you lose some of the metal's ductility, which is the ability to "bend before breaking." This means that if you have sudden, large force on your structure (shock load), it is more likely to fracture rather than bending or denting. No doubt the engineers at SpaceX are aware of this, and have adjusted their safety factors and fatigue analysis numbers to compensate.
@arekingi
@arekingi 4 роки тому
I'm two months late, but I'll say it anyway, as a fabricator who is very much NOT a metallurgist, I appreciated reading your comment and learned a bunch. Cheers!
@aboeckmann
@aboeckmann 4 роки тому
Wow! Very informative comment. Thanks
@doolittlegeorge
@doolittlegeorge 4 роки тому
*through use you find fatigue.* Simple as that. Just look at the number of launches *AND* landings.
@jeremytaylor3532
@jeremytaylor3532 3 роки тому
Popular Science had a great article back in the day about turbine blades in jets and how they would specially heat the blades and then cool them from one end to the other producing a blade that was essentially a single crystal.
@ryanbriggs3391
@ryanbriggs3391 3 роки тому
Wow, that explanation makes all kinds of sense:) Well done!
@EthanJbleethan
@EthanJbleethan 2 роки тому
Oh my god my dreams have come true. I have finally learnt how rocket engines work!!
@JDP-2024
@JDP-2024 3 роки тому
Thanks, Tim- Nicely done, very clear explanations of a complex topic.
@davidhilton3453
@davidhilton3453 4 роки тому
This is the most interesting online class I've ever taken. Can't take my eyes off the screen. Keep it up.
@hemprope4326
@hemprope4326 3 роки тому
Much more interesting than quarantine
@tiborpurzsas2136
@tiborpurzsas2136 3 роки тому
He is not that good looking.....)
@frederic.marquis7361
@frederic.marquis7361 3 роки тому
@@tiborpurzsas2136 dumbest comment ever !! Get a brain, Ken !!
@RmX.
@RmX. 3 роки тому
@@tiborpurzsas2136 what r u gay?
@davidpinto7975
@davidpinto7975 3 роки тому
@@tiborpurzsas2136 I actually think he is good looking :D
@albertpeugh9367
@albertpeugh9367 4 місяці тому
Great video, loved the fathom quip, you slid it in quite nicely.
@fishing1335
@fishing1335 3 роки тому
Love your videos. Me and my dad are hooked on rockets. We watch every spaceX livestream. Really appreciate you putting out these videos.
@chance1986
@chance1986 4 роки тому
The most informative 50 minutes I ever spent on UKposts. Thank you.
@glassooy1
@glassooy1 4 роки тому
thank you , its a great honor to see a master at work
@davemwangi05
@davemwangi05 4 роки тому
I sometimes encounter some 5 minutes video and feel pretty wasted. This 50 minutes felt like a 5 min video. cool informative
@stan.rarick8556
@stan.rarick8556 4 роки тому
If cars can be rated in horsepower, can methane powered rockets be rated in cowpower?
@rudolfkratky36
@rudolfkratky36 4 роки тому
-bigbraintime-
@coonjamalay
@coonjamalay 4 роки тому
@@ryp1562 the joke went over your head
@user-sf5iq2fl1l
@user-sf5iq2fl1l 4 роки тому
Cowpat
@Physiac
@Physiac 4 роки тому
It should be rated in llama thrust
@juniperpansy
@juniperpansy 4 роки тому
This would a great engineering project for Mennonites. A cow rocket fueled by hay. Probably would get their cattle faster to market too
@wafikiri_
@wafikiri_ 2 роки тому
First of your videos I've seen. I liked it so much that I subscribed without hesitation.
@romzcollainimz8533
@romzcollainimz8533 2 роки тому
That's a really beautiful science filled presentation Thank you for the animation, made it a lot easier for newbies like me follow along rocket science.. awesome
@adrian.farcas
@adrian.farcas 5 років тому
RD-171 still flying on Zenit rocket, 84 launches (last in December 2017) !
@DanielZajic
@DanielZajic 3 роки тому
You deserve awards for this work. Truly outstanding, Tim.
@Benn25
@Benn25 7 місяців тому
Yeah, like going around the moon? :p
@TheMan4407
@TheMan4407 3 роки тому
Had to watch this again for the large amount of information to sink in. Well done, and very well explained!
@AffectiveApe
@AffectiveApe 2 роки тому
I am doing some catch up on my knowledge of the current progress with spacex, thanks for making this incredible historical record of our progress for folks not in the industry.
@akyer8085
@akyer8085 4 роки тому
Girlfriend: What kind of clothes should I wear? Me: sounds like a methane fueled full flow staged combustion cycle engine is a good fit
@cavaliere5676
@cavaliere5676 4 роки тому
- Put on this T-shirt "Energy Buran".
@MattH-wg7ou
@MattH-wg7ou 4 роки тому
Love it!
@Levitiy
@Levitiy 4 роки тому
Now, the first ever flown methane fueled full-flow staged-combustion cycle rocket engine. It needs a better name.
@MattH-wg7ou
@MattH-wg7ou 4 роки тому
@@Levitiy better name than Raptor? Thats a pretty cool name, I thought.
@Levitiy
@Levitiy 4 роки тому
@@MattH-wg7ou I don't mean a brand name, I mean a name for the cycle configuration.
@angel-nw4in
@angel-nw4in 5 років тому
I almost never watch a video longer than 30 minutes, but you kept me interested! Awesome video!
@johnfoulk3448
@johnfoulk3448 2 роки тому
Very good explanation of the different types being used. Well thought out with enough detail to get the gears whirring. Thanks!
@PramochanYaan
@PramochanYaan 3 місяці тому
Really Fun and Informative Video, Thanks for Making it!!!
@Wintergatan
@Wintergatan 4 роки тому
Thank you for making this!
@thestudentofficial5483
@thestudentofficial5483 3 роки тому
Didn't know you watched Tim also. I like your music, G.
@Cryseris
@Cryseris 3 роки тому
Weird to see you here, also when is the marble machine X gonna be done
@anthrazite
@anthrazite 3 роки тому
@@Cryseris Maybe watch his stuff, then you'd see ^^
@HeidenLam
@HeidenLam 3 роки тому
Wasn’t expecting you to be here
@ivminic1949
@ivminic1949 3 роки тому
U americans think u r exceptional in everything u think u. Hope and talk about going 2 Mara soon. U haven t even gone 2 the moon yet
@Kumquat_Lord
@Kumquat_Lord 5 років тому
Three months in the making. Totally worth the wait, Tim!
@dukeoversteer
@dukeoversteer 9 місяців тому
Great job Tim. Your explanations are very clear. Combined with the excellent graphics this is a very instructional video. Keep up the good work.
@yteicosf1103
@yteicosf1103 2 роки тому
dude this is the starter pack for learning how rocket engines work
@SD-tj5dh
@SD-tj5dh 4 роки тому
I love these 50 minute videos. It feels like a proper documentary. Please make more like this.
@InventorZahran
@InventorZahran 3 роки тому
"The Raptor is truly a GoldieLOX engine..."
@implodingbaby
@implodingbaby 3 роки тому
A AAA AAAH
@karanguyen7569
@karanguyen7569 3 роки тому
Absolutely incredible. I’m speechless. Can’t believe I actually just watched this video on UKposts for free...
@small_SHOT
@small_SHOT 3 роки тому
Not funny Didn’t laugh
@thenativemartian5169
@thenativemartian5169 3 роки тому
*sighs in defeat.* you got me bro
@ismawan1980
@ismawan1980 3 роки тому
@@karanguyen7569 you copied another comment, oh well
Why don't rocket engines melt? How engineers keep engines cool
26:31
Everyday Astronaut
Переглядів 3,5 млн
SLS VS Starship: Why does SLS still exist?!
49:21
Everyday Astronaut
Переглядів 3,2 млн
когда одна дома // EVA mash
00:51
EVA mash
Переглядів 2,4 млн
Артем Пивоваров х Klavdia Petrivna - Барабан
03:16
Artem Pivovarov
Переглядів 1,7 млн
Why have SpaceX, Boeing & Blue Origin ditched abort towers?
19:28
Everyday Astronaut
Переглядів 2,5 млн
Rocket Fuel Injectors - Things Kerbal Space Program Doesn't Teach
17:51
Scott Manley
Переглядів 862 тис.
How Much Do Rockets Pollute? Are They Bad For Our Air?
55:46
Everyday Astronaut
Переглядів 1,2 млн
Are Aerospikes Better Than Bell Nozzles?
1:01:31
Everyday Astronaut
Переглядів 3,7 млн
Why Next Generation Rockets are Using Methane
9:34
Scott Manley
Переглядів 812 тис.
Why won’t Starship have an abort system? Should it?!
48:44
Everyday Astronaut
Переглядів 2,7 млн
Aerospike Engines - Why Aren't We Using them Now?
13:39
Curious Droid
Переглядів 4,2 млн
Starship Makes NO SENSE Until You Realize This...
17:00
Two Bit da Vinci
Переглядів 1 млн
Will New Glenn be the KING of Heavy Lift Rockets?
24:13
Everyday Astronaut
Переглядів 2,1 млн
У Nokia 3310 появился конкурент
0:36
AndroHack
Переглядів 1,8 млн
Зачем вы показываете ноутбук в аэропорту?✈️
0:29
Power AC Coolness with Anker SOLIX F3800
0:27
Anker SOLIX
Переглядів 3,4 млн