The video goes mute at 30:18

😮

CAN YOU STOP ADDING SO MANY ADDS..... WE GET IT YOU WANT MONEY... BUT JEEZ ... CUT IT OUT

there are so many factors that influenced our life on earth and if you take out just one of them, no way life (as we know it) would be possible... and there is also 'time' dimension, are we talking now, or 10 billion years ago... if there is no even bacteria on other planets in solar system (and so far all things indicate that there arent any) then it is 'almost certain' that there are no space traveling aliens around us (in milky way)... lets imagine that humans manage to colonise several planets, how much time, you think, before we mapped all planets in our galaxy? i'd say in a blink from universe perspective, also we would dominate and exterminate everything, cause thats who we are, and almost all life on earth is like that (dominating, cause it is written in our genes, only we call it -will to survive and procreate) and why would 'aliens' be any different? yet clearly noone colonised or exterminated us, therefore that logic you mentioned says there is noone around! it's either that or space travel (with any meaningful speed) is simply not possible, so whatever the case - WE ARE ALONE!!!

I fell asleep 30 minutes in

Me

You just woke me up, damn your eyes!😠

Yep

Literally just put this on to fall asleep to got comfortable and then read your comment 😂😂

And that is how you never learn anything...

I was looking for this comment 😂

...I'mma skip it, thx

...I'mma fall asleep, anyway 😌

It's actually more interesting without the sound.

I've always thought this. We look for water as a sign of life (amongst other things) but what's to say another life form would find oxygen/water incompatible with their life?

I have studied Zoology and Life science and have the degree in same. I would often argue that, life is very rare outside the earth. But also if we need to find life, we must look at the theories we have regarding the origin of life and the primitive form of life. There were many factors and phenomenons responsible for life on earth. There are may not be many photosynthetic life outside earth but may be there might be many chemosynthetic life forms and probably are microbes. Intelligent life form is like finding a particular grain of sand in the beach. Unless we can track how to trace chemosynthetic life form, it will take us may be 100s or even 1000s of years to even trace a photosynthetic life form(not even talking about intelligent life).

You are so right I totally agree 👍 😊 it was a really helpful and interesting video 😊

And how would it be possible to think otherwise?😁

The laws of physics are the same for the universe. Only those dimensions that are physically provable count, because you can't travel through dimensions you can't see or be aware of

@@richardcaves3601 I think we all know as much about inter-dimensional travel as a pioneer knew about iPhones.

That's because it's censored.

I thought it was my phone

...I'm gonna skip it, thx I neeeded that 🎉

Why would it be censored? ​@@gonzoxp

I look at it this way. Before people could engineer boats that crossed seas, we didn't even know that there were other continents. Space is the new sea and all we have to do is figure out how we make ships that'll cross space and we'll discover other species and lands.

Yes, universe is a big, lot of alien planet are existing. Infact aliens are visiting earth and investigating as. Do not thing aliens are like as, may be different creatures like for example plant uses carbondioxide to inhale and exihibit oxygen, like that other aliens may uses different thing to survive. Beyond our solar system, lot of planet are habitable. Lot of sidhar discussing about the life in other planet. Even they traveled through their power of meditation, through their outer body experience.

​@@adithya67and your scientific evidence for this is?

The earth was made specifically for us.

@@adithya67🤡🤡🤡

**This is true, on vortex natural simulation, bee and thunder the two sources of life, masculine and feminine, bee looks at a mud pit for fun, think of prehistoric plants, and day and night

@@thunderbee6Stop trying to sound smart, earth is the only planet with life.

@@Chachi21 I don't believe in sacredness but awareness is a single point in space time, making everyone all knowing, and the pedophiles would be teamed up against, since all knowing

@@thunderbee6 If that were true then pedo’s wouldn’t be able to get away with being pedo’s.

@@thunderbee6 also of course you don’t because you don’t believe in a one true God because you don’t want to have to answer for anything.

Thank you for this! Have you also read The Law of One?

Your welcome.Yes I have@@HH-hm3qn

Try Brian Cox. Try Stephen Hawking. Try the Rare Earth Theory. Try science, not sci-fi.

but yea look at the branches of the vagus nerve, I'm about imaginative,icy,genius,ninja, discipline

Bruh... What? @@thunderbee6

We're not, mathematically, but we are in this galaxy. Every other galaxy is so far away, that even by the time their light gets here such civilizations that might have been, are long gone.

@user-br6bf7fo9c 100% true👍

@@richardcaves3601 Says who why would we be alone in our galaxy? What about the whistleblower David Grusch with UAPs or Chuck Shumer with the UAP Disclosure Act that got gutted?

Thanks! And thanks for stopping by to let us know.

It’s always only CGI with these planetary stories… if you could actually critically think then you’d realize these are just BS stories outside of earth.

There’s been a huge battle between Religion and Science. Nowadays, science and technology are so advanced that they’re sending Kepler to play the role of Magellan the voyager. I’m pretty sure NASA, Chinese and Russians are working on a similar project but with AI Robots to maybe land on those planets. Anyway, that’s just me.

you watch too many movies 😂

​@darrel7589 He was factually correct. In todays times, we are not asking "are there aliens out there" but rather, "when will we find them" By them, I do not mean grey aliens or intelligent lifeforms, I'm talking about micro-organisms living in extreme conditions proven to survive in those conditions on earth. So it's not If they are there it's when will we come across them, we now know the fundamentals of what causes life and evolution, and these materials have been theorised and observed in some cases on other planets and interstellar objects. (From memory, I belive life is likely to exist on one of the moons of Jupiter. An exploration mission keeps getting denied to explore it further) There is alot of research on these subjects today, its very interesting in your like space science etc.

Ofc there’s life out there it just we can’t travel that far with our technology. It’s like humans in the pass standing on a beach looking at the sea wondering if there’s other beyond the sea , until they built a ship to sailed the sea and found other humans.

What is 'obvious' about it?

I think all life comes from the same mysterious seed, but develops differently in accordance with its environment. I don't think we'd see anything humanoid out there.

Unlike Crippen? He was innocent, actually.

That's scary

? 'life' is a word. Words are created by humans. Humans ascribe meanings to them. So, any phenomenon that does not satisfy its given meaning is not covered by that word.

cheaplaugh...Would you like me to try to simplify it for you? Etymology is not about insects, you know?

Of course there is, just it's all single cellular life. There's no other multicellular life in our galaxy, let alone intelligent multicellular life. Other galaxies are just too far away.

@rawhyde6409 You are right! Absolutely!

@@richardcaves3601 Thats just completely false information.

Too bad we already have.

❤ of course...they are may be waiting for us??

Rotation too fast for life. Too close to sun for life. Too hot or too cold. Too near a neutron star. No Moon to slow orbit or rotation. No tilt to give seasons. No water. No carbon or other minerals necessary for life. Orbit too eliptical. No gas giants outside to deflect asteroids and comets. Sorry pal, but to date, none are suitable for even single cellular life, let alone multicellular life, and a long, long way from intelligent multicellular life.

**This is true, on vortex natural simulation, bee and thunder the two sources of life, masculine and feminine, bee looks at a mud pit for fun, think of prehistoric plants, and day and night

@@thunderbee6 nah, bees are multicellular life, and that's not possible for such planets

@@richardcaves3601 just in case you're not understanding, bee is a name

@@thunderbee6 for what?

Nope, every single radio signal we've received has been a neutron star or like Jupiter, something natural.

We've got people like David Grusch and Chuck Shumer talking about Non Human Intelligence Crash Retrieval Programs so we do have proof.

By the time we got their signal, they will have long gone. The average civilization lasts 400 years.

that's belief

Why are you sure of that?

@@gilessteve my own opinion, and sure of it 🤗

@@xygnus44 But I asked 'why'? Just interested.

Try evidence based science and not superstition.

Exactly, we're it for this galaxy. Others are too far away.

Your scientific evidence is?

think about it.@@richardcaves3601

Yes, there are alien races human like. And there are different.

Only in sci-fi 😂😂😂😂😂, not in real science ​@@42nauris

But very little multicellular life, and even less intelligent multicellular life.

@@richardcaves3601 Not true

@@42nauris yes, scientific fact. The requirements for life are many, including water. There's over 200 million suns in our galaxy and guess how many have had water on them for over 3.5 million years? Just one - us. There's plenty of potential for life, especially single cellular bacterial life or microbial life, but the jump to multicellular life is huge, and the jump to multicellular intelligent life is way, way more. Ask any biologist.

No liquid water, sorry.

a tc would be helpful.

Nope, we're the end product of 3.5 billion years of evolution on a stable planet in a stable solar system, in a stable galaxy. All three are extremely rare.

@@richardcaves3601 we now know that most stars have satellites and that a medium percentage fall in the goldie locks zone. With billions of stars just in our galaxy and trillions of known gallaxies, the amount of planets that could support life as we know it is exceedingly high. Multiply that by the fact that there is most likely many forms of life we don't know that can exist outside of our liquid water zone.

@@TheBrall completely and utterly untrue. ALL the data from the five space telescopes show not one has a Moon like ours - most don't have moons at all, and those that do show them to be tiny. There's between 200 & 300 M stars in the Milky Way, and about two trillion galaxies. Only a small number have star density and composition similar to ours. Andromeda, out nearest neighbour, is too densely packed and too volatile to have a star system like ours. Water and and atmosphere like ours, the absolute minimum for just single cellular life, just isn't here in our galaxy. All the so called super earths rotate too fast, have an orbit of just days and are not suitable for life. You need to factor in every single condition biologists and geologists deem necessary for life to evolve. When you've done that, try and factor in the extremely low chance of a Moon like ours, given what we know of the Thea collision. The Drake Equation is a good starting point, but the Rare Earth Theory is better. Try Ward and Brownlee.

@@richardcaves3601 , there are some points that you brought up that I'd like to reply on. You said, "completely and utterly untrue. ALL the datafrom the five space telescopes show not one has a moon like ours - most don't have moons at all, and those that do show them to be tiny." I see that you mentioned the telescopes. Let's listed to what Hubble creators say on teh subject rather than use our own words. "However, an Earth-like moon, a Goldilocks Moon, in orbit around this planet could sustain life if it were massive enough to retain an Earth-like atmosphere. ""We determined that a habitable exomoon is possible in orbit around kepler-16b," While this is an example of a moon sustaining life it is also an example of one the nearest planets to us and it just happens to have this possibility. Our technology is still early on in being able to detect planets orbiting stars. Very early. It was theorized that most stars had them but we've only recently found a way to prove it. And oh boy did we ever. Now the data is rolling in with so many planets orbiting stars showing the early theories to be true and even finding them now an increasingly higher rate.

Right now finding those planets is har enough, finding satellites orbiting those planets is, of course, the next move. I'll give you 3 guesses what the theory is behind how many planets have these satellites but the first 2 don't count, hehe. it's a lot. They're almost sure that even on eof the closest planets, Kepler 16b, has one. The numbers in the end are almost assuredly going to result in findings in the same fashio that finding orbiting planets did.

Huge jump from single cellular life to multicellular life, and even bigger jump to intelligent multicellular life.

Nope, sorry but there just isn't. Read Brian Cox. Read Stephen Hawking. Read the Rare Earth Theory. There's between a hundred million and four hundred million suns in our smallish galaxy, which is one of two hundred trillion galaxies in the observable universe. But, read chemistry and biology for the rules that allow single cellular life to evolve from the 93 natural elements. Then read about the huge jump for multicellular life to evolve. Then read about the further huge jump for intelligent multicellular life to evolve. Then read astronomy to find out about the huge number of life killing things just in our galaxy. Then read about the huge number of Goldilocks events necessary for us to evolve. Yes, we're it for this galaxy, and all the others are so far away we'll never hear from them, or if we do, they'll have been long gone.

When they get filmed messing up. Delete delete delete

So let's say everything is connected to the day you born !!! I recommend more holly water ⌚💦

So the question is who was created first Adam or Eva?