No wonder why students aren't competitive nor learning anymore. 😔

Woke people be like: “Competition is racist”

His voice tellz me enough... He's a groomer

Great. Parents can move children out of the school who force students to be trans and teachers dressed in drag.

That Fairfax guy doesn’t even understand the simple concept of competition and why it’s good. They’re just protecting themselves, end of story…

Give him a break, he went to public school...

Ban: mandatory school, gov control over education and curriculum, hsd and ged requirements, public school, directly tax funding schools. Let kids learn job skills and work instead

He'll be allowed to "teach" children for the next 20 - 30 years.

That's not a quote, at least not from this video.

@@holycrapchris 3:30 mark

Where is that?

@@gbrown3783 At about 1:32 in the video is where it starts, then concludes at about 1:49.

Oh I dk how I missed that thanks

I thought that was a little strange too. When I got out of college, I ended up substituting for about a quarter of a school year because a teacher went out sick. It was very challenging, but I really enjoyed it. This was back in the 1980s and I used to joke that it was 85% crowd control and 15% teaching. LOL, I cannot imagine what it is like to teach now.

He should've said, "Not in Indoctrination"

I completely agree with you. It doesn't make sense to you because there's nothing to make sense of. He didn't answer the question. He just sat there and insisted John was wrong like some 2 yr old sticking his thumbs in his ears and chanting stupidities in the false belief that saying something enough will somehow make it true. This is the problem with trying to reason with someone in a monopolized system. They never want the monopoly to be bad because it makes them feel safe knowing they have a guaranteed job/income/safety net.

“Not in Education” - Translation: "Not good for *ME* because *I* am in Education."

@@Cdaragorn Capitalism is a designed system, to tear people apart. To compete and fight for earnings. It will NEVER be a good thing.

His argument was that there should be collaboration rather than competition. The problem is there is no such thing as collaborating with parasitic organizations like unions. They don't exist to collaborate and improve, they only exist to leach from the system.

They don't know those things LOL, these teachers are all taught in government schools how to be teachers.

CRT should only mean cathode ray tube.

@@marshmower And both are obsolete...Lol!

@@marshmower I fire up a CRT to play old light gun games on my Sega Master system. Ironically, when the CRT TV turns on, it emits a high-pitched noise that my nieces and nephews can't stand. So, the kids are wise to how dumb and out of touch CRT is LOL.

Ban: mandatory school, gov control over education and curriculum, hsd and ged requirements, public school, directly tax funding schools. Let kids learn job skills and work instead

Our local high school lost its accreditation a few years back for a year or so but being in rural south GA there were no private schools in the county for those that wanted to send their kids else where to do such. And the local voters put the idiots back on the school board that allowed it to happen. A lot of folks with kids left town. I work 4 counties over now and bring my kid with me so I can keep him out of that mess of a school system. I feel so bad for the kids that are stuck in it and mad when I paid my property taxes because of how they are being wasted.

We have school choice in my country there are private schools but a select few because there is no need . Public schools once you can choose become quite good.

Don't forget about our LEADERS who hypocritically sent their kids to the best private schools possible.

Ban: mandatory school, gov control over education and curriculum, hsd and ged requirements, public school, directly tax funding schools. Let kids learn job skills and work instead

@@bvegannow1936 for a permanent working class?

@@brownman304 What we have now is a permanent working class with zero money skills. It's time for a change.

@@brownman304 public education grooms students to be working drones (I went through the public school system). There is so much important information that should be taught in schools that aren't. The simplest and most important is money skills like @Chris4321 mentioned. If people could learn how to manage their finances from an early age, we'd have far less people dependent on paycheck-to-paycheck employment.

@@brownman304 also, there are several fields out there that don't require certain levels of schooling. Many could be learning skills while on the job if a student wished to apprentice under someone, but right now everyone is required by law to go through the square-peg-must-be-rounded-to-fit-round-hole machine.

Ban: mandatory school, gov control over education and curriculum, hsd and ged requirements, public school, directly tax funding schools. Let kids learn job skills and work instead

I live for the day that states do right for responsible tax payers as tell parents “no more welfare handouts: if you can’t afford to educate your child we’ll place it with a parent that can, whom you will pay child support to.”

@@bobroberts2581 theres over 100,000+ us kids up for adoption, and additionally tons of kids on welfare. Theres not enuf parents that r able and willing to adopt all the kids who r on welfare or up for adoption in usa. Kids can get a better education than k thru 12 via library and internet, which can cost about $30/m.

NAPS is worse

The system is broken due to capitalism. Get it right.

Public education is the best when it is adequately funded and taken care of, unlike private education that only seeks to maximise profits at the expense of proper education.

@@JakubKieblesz hahaha. Nothing you said is backed by actual facts. Capitalism is the best due to its ability to make everyone equal. Public schools do so much worse due to their mismanagement of funds and inability to teach actual education. Public schools get a massive amount of funding yet perform at the lowest in evaluations. Private schools only get funding when they perform at expected levels or higher thus their scores are traditionally better. Public education was put in place to take the rights of parents away and to indoctrinate the youth. The quality of education has barley improved despite receiving massive funding and countless required curriculum changes. The entire point of public education is not the betterment of society but the manipulation and forced indoctrination of young and naive minds. It's the same with religions, if you wait until people can think on their own there's no way religions would survive. Once people understand what our education system is doing, they snap out of it usually and realize that public education and so called higher learning are not beneficial they are harmful and should be eradicated.

@@JakubKieblesz Provide some actual evidence and maybe we'll see some reason to listen to this nonsense. As it is the evidence is overwhelming that competition (capitalism) makes education tons better. Like it or not having profit as a motivator is NOT actually a bad thing.

@@JakubKieblesz Wrong. It seeks to maximize profits. To do so it MUST provide better education than those it's competing against. This idea that profit is an evil motivator is selfish and stupid. All evidence shows profit is a GREAT motivator WHEN there is competition.

Not to mention a complete disaster

The result is bad teachers being allowed to teach for 30 years, and the 100's of children who have skill gaps that sometimes never get addressed.

The school unions ARE the problem not part of it.

Same in UAW

It's basically communism.

I don't think teachers are making such high earnings at this point though. We have a bunch of administrators getting all our public school dollars, teachers underpaid, and nonsensical top down, one size fits all education mandates that ignore that kids are actually people and not cogs. The unions are part of the problem, only that they strip away the goal of why teachers go into the profession.

Problem is that school choice creates these schools. In Australia we never had high crime schools. 25 years ago there was a silent campaign to get parents to go private. Now 1 in 3 kids go to private schools. As the ratio of well off families in some schools increased, the ratio in public schools decreased. When disadvantaged kids make up 50% of a school they become nearly impossible to run due to a lack of positive role models for kids to copy. As Australia has moved to private education our academics have fallen. I attended my local high school. It was considered one of the worst in my city yet most kids succeeded. We had maybe 5% of kids who were challenging. 20 years later the area we live in has more affluent families but that same school has a higher ratio of disadvantaged kids. It's a much harder school. The top education system in the world has zero choice. If you're rich or poor you have to send your kids to your local public school.

@@MrZoomah if it is true school choice than all the parents have the ability to remove their kids from the failing school not just the wealthy kids Going to a private school. Basically you could start a business educating students and they would come to your school. So it is hard to believe that an option of private publicly funded schools would be the only cause of degradation of the other school.

@@SB-fl9lh What people forget is that the ability to pay for the school isn't the only barrier to school choice. Poor families work longer hours and have less access to transport. School buses serve a local area and you can't expect a school to send transport for one or two children. As to my local school, given local wealth has increased, student numbers have fallen yet the ratio of disadvantaged to strong families has increased shows something is going on. Why can't disadvantaged families, who care just as much for their children, get their kids to a different school? Why do disadvantaged families not send their child 30minutes - 1 hour from home to go to the same schools as the other students? It's transport. Then we can ask why don't affluent families send their kids to the local public school? First reason is people have been tricked into thinking private schools give a better education while, in Australia, all research points to them doing the same job for more money. The second issue is that in school choice reputation is everything. When people think of which school to choose they will type it into google. If you type the school I talked about into google you get a page of news headlines from one incident in 2007. I would say this is a big reason why affluent families wouldn't send their kids there. This is why private schools have media managers and social media managers. Looking good is more important than academics. Also, reputation is the reason why these schools refuse to take kids with ADHD, PTSD or other disabilities. Foster children in my state can attend private schools but most get refused. Schools aren't legally allowed to refuse them but they can claim they don't have the resources to help them. Some of these kids come with up to $60k of funding on top of their school fees and government payments but schools know that one bad incident can ruin their school. This again concentrates the disadvantage into public schools.

@@MrZoomah Australias private schools are so governed by the government they are basically expensive public schools

@@mike-cc3dd I would agree with that in terms of the curriculum. All schools are required to adhere to the Australia curriculum. How they do it is up to them. I would also say it's a two way street. Government has a lot of control over private education through curriculum, but private education (mainly the rich, prestigious ones) have control over education policy and where money goes. The fact that the the Gonski scheme was never implemented for fear of the backlash from private education is a testament to this. The main difference is public schools have to help all students, private schools can get rid of them or refuse access to the school.

Just make sure she's socially active too As that's definitely not less important then education

Demographics are everything. A teacher who is extremely adept at teaching a content area may not be able to handle a classroom of 25 students with 2 highly disruptive students. Conversely, a teacher who can lock a class down and has GREAT classroom management, may not have much time or space in the class left for effective teaching or addressing individual students needs.

@@User9681e By brother and his wife have been home schooling their 2 girls since day one. One just finished High School level I think. Hone Schooling these days does including getting together all the time for activity’s with other home schooled kids. That is pretty normal unless your family lives in the middle of nowhere.

@@jbdragon3295 I can't remember where I read it or heard it so maybe you can answer this question. Homeschooled children only need three or four hours a day and do better than kids in Public School. Do you know if this is true? Also since those two girls are not going to public school that means the school don't need the money they receive. How about your brother and his wife get half of the money each year. So something like $20,000 to $30,000 would be a nice amount for them to teach their kids, take them on field trips, get top of the line computers and software and maybe a bunch of other things to help with education. Oh and a membership to the Y for socialization and gym, other wonderful things to help them learn. OK shut up Frank you know you can go all day talking about what parents can do homeschooling.

@@francisdhomer5910 Kids are generally further along homeschooled because you can go at the kids pace, not the class pace. Homeschooling your own kids doesn’t cost $20-30k. Only if you sent your kids to a private school as you would have to pay for that. Unless your state had a voucher system, but you don’t get that much to pay for a private school. You know the government isn’t going to give you money if you take your kids out of school. I have no kids and yet I pay the same property taxes as those around me with kids. A large percentage of property taxes goes to schools.

I was hoping it filter out some of the BS, but I was disappointed.

Maybe a brain too while we are at it.

That's all public education ever has been. It's designed to indoctrinate kids to serve and obey the government, not to teach them anything useful. There's a reason why you don't learn or practice critical thinking skills in public schools, and why classes that do teach those things in college are optional electives. The government and the highest classes don't want people to be able to think for themselves. Critical thinking and reasoning skills ought to be taught and practiced starting as early as the first grade, and have those things continue to be taught and practiced with gradually increasing complexity with each grade level up through the 12th grade. I don't like the idea of using force to teach kids those things, but if we start teaching our kids how to think critically, rationally and independently, our society will be far better off and much more intelligent.

Not for job security

It's kinda sad. You'd think the democrats would have at least one equal consumer advocate. But they don't. At least not anymore.

@@creativitysubs9935 waaaaaay back in the day, Stossel _WAS_ a Democrat and aired on ABC. That's before the MSM and Democrats went loony.

How much of this relative fortune goes for the children, vs. the thousands of bureaucrats?

Thank you Governor Ducey!

A great leap forward.

One small step for voters. One giant leap for voters' children.

@@jason200912 Oh god, don't call it that, Mao ruined that phrase.

@@lainiwakura1776 his fault for calling it a giant leap

Ban: mandatory school, gov control over education and curriculum, hsd and ged requirements, public school, directly tax funding schools. Let kids learn job skills and work instead

Because the Unions support the politicians financially, that's why.

When a state has over 7%? 8% as members of public service unions, the often swing the elections. But you cannot complain about the group seeking after their own groups power.

YT keeps censoring my posts: search for teachers union political donations. 66 million dollars in just 2020

One simple reason, because of Government. If parents were really smart and thought about there children, they would do Home Schooling. The real reason we have most of the problems, is because of the propaganda factory's called Public Schools, owned by the government, wake up people, everything they own and do is bad, bad for everyone but themselves.

Not only for his future but also the future of America. I feel really bad for those children who are taught by blue hair teacher with LGBTQIA stuff and sex too. 😔 They're sexualizing the children and it's sick.

My daughter is above grade level in reading and one year ahead in math in her charter. She learns science and the charter is history based, so they learn many things especially around the constitution. And she knew the pledge of allegiance at 5 plus Lee Greenwood’s hid bless the USA by heart.

🥰🥰🥰

Amen

They should really find a way to outlaw the alphabet teachers!

Ban: mandatory school, gov control over education and curriculum, hsd and ged requirements, public school, directly tax funding schools. Let kids learn job skills and work instead

👍

Writing to your state legislature might work better.

It's so horrible how it is same here in the Philippines. We've copy every American education system and ironically we have the same problem today too.

WOW! I really mean it. WOW! I believe you, it's just so unbelievable that you get to stay home because you are upset over an election. Hell in one company I worked for I was only allowed three days off when my dad died. Yet teachers get to stay home because their candidate lost? What would they have done if Trump lost, and a supermajority ended up in both the Senet and House? Close the school?

Online learning is the future. Everyone isolated to stop resistance to their scheme.

And it showed that homeschooling works

Typical union. Unfortunately, this is how unions almost always work.

I'm in AZ, what program was it? My daughter is starting high school next year

@@yolacintia Humanity and Science in Tempe. Not sure if it’s still there, my daughter is now 31 years old. If it is still there……excellent school!

mostly the thing I hated was not being taught things that I would need to know as an adult. How to fix an engine would be super useful, for example, as if my car breaks down I'm lost to what to do. Knowing how banks work, how money works, how to invest, how to apply for a job, what jobs want - experance in relevent fields so that I can show the job that I am applying for that I have experance - how credit works, how to have a relationship, kids, adopt, put up a kid for adoption, how to rent, how to find bargens, what voting is - what political people DO - all the things that adults are just ment to "know" somehow magically - something about law maybe! How does law work?! What are the laws?! If you are able to teach those sorts of real life things - then I'm behind you 1000% - also perhaps teach % and informal logic, and ethics. :D

@@DeconvertedMan I agree with some of what you wrote. But schools, particularly high schools, do indeed have courses that teach on accounting, shop class, occupational education, etc. Students are free to choose those courses. What I disagree is learning about relationships, adoption, etc. Those topics should have no place in public school but rather taught by parents. Imagine the government telling you how they think your relationship should be. That's a recipe for pushing more woke evil.

@@DeconvertedMan My school had a mechanics program and shop. But it wasn’t mandatory. I took it and it was fun. Just look into the schools programs and it will work out fine.

@@billvigus3719 some do. mine didnt.

@@DeconvertedMan doubt that

Yes, so true! I am a retired teacher. The bureaucratic red tape is a nightmare and in most cases a complete waste of a teacher's time.

Amen. If teachers were allowed to teach without 1000 programs and expectations attached, maybe kids would learn.

No it breeds division. Lets start by not calling it USA anymore...it will become the States of America

That is my one concern. Once they give you money they start taking control. The government would love nothing more than to tell Christian schools which parts of the Bible they can't teach.

With vouchers the PARENTS are receiving the money, not the schools.

@Raylan Givens Right. Government (or any large organization, really) will try everything it can think of to control whatever it wants to control. The important thing is for people to NOT let it. That's half the reason central control is so pervasive -- people say "can't someone else do this?" and cheerfully hand over control of everything except their snack cabinet, just so THEY don't have to do it.

The parents receive the money. The school doesnt

True, but as soon as a parent is forced to think about where to send their child, they become more involved in the process. My parents sacrificed to send me to Catholic schools, and now I homeschool my own children. My K-12 education was 90% very good (some things slipped through the cracks); my poor husband is self taught and was practically abused in his local schools to which his parents mindlessly sent him.

From my experience as an educator, the parents who are willing to find and take their children to a charter school are involved in their education. I think the pandemic "woke" a lot of parents up to what was or wasn't happening in their child's school.

@Ben C. Smith: EXACTLY!!! people think more school funding is the answer to everything. WRONG!! The key is doing 2-4 hours of homework every night _WITH_ a parent (or 2) deeply, deeply involved.

Most parents won’t even work to pay for their own kids education. You think welfare sponges like that are going to out the time in to raise their kids? “It takes a village” to tell parents to shut the goddamned mouths and get another job.

I'm not so sure I'd say paramount, but you're right, parents are one of the top factors for top students. But on their own, parents have limits on what they can do to compensate for a disruptive classroom. Edit: The PTA involvement is a good way for parents' voices to be heard.

Charter schools are a complete hit or miss. I dont trust em

Although I have the opposite experience, as I thrive well in the classroom setting, I still will question why it's the norm to stuff what feels like 10 hours worth of assignments onto a student for homework and claim that it's "useful" when most of the learning should be provided in the classroom anyway. Don't get me started on the state of the English subject class with the fact that it relies purely on the teacher's subjective grading of in-class essays (who the fuck thought that testing a person's ability to make a quality essay under a short amount of time diminishes the shorter the time you give them?). It shouldn't be standard to understand the material and still be rocking Ds and Cs simply because your schedule is packed with extracurriculars, definitely not projecting my personal issues right?

@@goodboi1725 i actually think that’s exactly it. Everyone has personal issues and that’s why we need choice . For me I’m actually great at English. I can write short stories and have actually started writing a fiction novel in my free time . I once had a teacher even keep a poem i wrote as an example to use for students in the future . My personal issues were all math , science , and anything with equations

@@drugsarebad97 I just feel like its a matter of how well the school environment nurtures your learning. With math, I struggled with carrying numbers for basic subtraction. It probably wasn't until my parents stepped in to help with things, such as memorizing the times tables, did I really feel comfortable with it. I can only assume this could've been the same if I had the same amount of help with writing.

It looked like he was making a hostage video. The way his eyes darted around was unsettling.

That's why he was chosen, to defend the pro union narrative.

Petition for ballot initiative and tell your canidates to Ban: mandatory school, gov control over education and curriculum, hsd and ged requirements, public school, directly tax funding schools. Let kids learn job skills and work instead. Many people that work in the public school system and many of their friends and family probably voted against vouchers. Need enuf parents and others to vote for more choice. Parents should care more about their kids than the public school workers care about their paycheck.

@@bvegannow1936 Not true... While I don't work in the school system. My mom/brother/sister and many friends do. They all voted for the voucher system and so did most the people they know. It is activist mostly. Even most teachers want a better system.

@@eabe_7397 Yes it is painful to see some young teachers not be able to say or change anything, and who want to really teach and do a good job. We fought our district for three years, sold our house, to get our daughter placed in a school that specializes in her learning disability. I remember one IEP meeting where her young fairly new teacher was sitting across from me. The Special Ed coordinator was droning on about how our daughter was making progress and they couldn't give her some of the things our specialists were saying she needed. I could see this teacher really wanted to say something. Was it that the SpEd coordinator was full of it? When the teacher did talk it was reading her written evaluation and nothing else. We finally got her placed and the school had no tests to prove she was making appreciable progress. It was all about money and keeping the money in the system. Still to this day I remember the look on that poor teacher's face how she really wanted to say something but was probably being forced to shut her mouth.

I am a retired teacher. Fighting against the powerful Teacher Unions is an uphill battle. Most teachers that I know favor school choice. We know our educational system is dysfunctional.

So Sad.

Ban: mandatory school, gov control over education and curriculum, hsd and ged requirements, public school, directly tax funding schools. Let kids learn job skills and work instead

maybe we can find something in between. The difference is the parents. Now that the parents are stepping up education as a whole will benefit.

They'd be a hell of a lot more efficient too. Teachers and admin would actually have to up their game to keep their job. Making all schools private is a really great idea and eliminates the Dept. of Education which is a collosal waste of money. In NJ the state sold the Garden State Parkway to a company and within a few years, the road (which in the north is 8 lanes) was repaved. In the south, it was widened from four lanes to six to help relieve some of the shore traffic gridlock. Hmmm...

Average kids can learn math reading and writing up to a 3rd grade level at home before age 5 for about $5000 total, not per year, via educational video games, videos, internet, library, and other educational materials. For kids that r too dumb to be left home alone, each kids parents could pay a neighborhood babysitter/teacher $1/hr ($160/month), so the babysitter/teacher could be paid $30/hr ($4,800/m) if they watched 30 kids. If u pay $2000/yr for babysitting/teacher fees for 4years, plus $5000 for educational materials, its $13,000 total. It would be about 4.6 times cheaper than public school. 4 years of Public school per student is about $60,000. Almost everything taught in school past 3rd grade is useless to most people and most jobs. kids could learn the info taught in k thru 12 on their own via things like library and internet if they wanted, But learning job skills or working would be a better use of their time and resources.

Imagine if someone could start a homeschool group and make $90k a year to teach 3 kids. I think you could find some pretty smart and dedicated people who would sign up for that.

No you need competition not the elimination of options. This would not create more competition and would be no different than forced public schooling.

Smart kid lol.

@@collinb.8542 Thanks. 😊 She's a walking encyclopedia like her father and interesting to talk to.

Shakespearian English isn't Old English. It's Early Modern English.

@@tompeled6193 ~ It's close enough for me, even if it's technically incorrect. That is the term the teacher used. The KJV Bible was translated in 1611 and Shakespeare died in 1616 so they were contemporary. I've only heard of the KJV as the Bible translation in Old English. Why split hairs over a term? Is it important?

@@melodykubiak5850 Old English is what was spoken from 400-1060. It's a completely different language from Modern English. Grammatical gender, no Norman French influence, inflection, etc.

I think it's telling that homeschoolers don't get funding. If school choice was about helping kids the money would be available for parents. This shows me that school choice is driven by people making money out of it who lobby the government.

he's a national treasure.

Ban: mandatory school, gov control over education and curriculum, hsd and ged requirements, public school, directly tax funding schools. Let kids learn job skills and work instead

He actually acknowledges that it forces educators to step up their game, but somehow stills see that as bad because we arn't all working together like communists. Seems to me that he's afraid of merit-based competition because he'll lose. Same old story will all unions tbh.

How so? Cuz they dont want competitions taking away their customers and loose profits over it. Sounds like the public school system is like a cartel.