wel, we had one break of 10 minute,s but other then that, it was perfect indeed. Movie was very good

@@user-el5hk7ex5k Lmao classic internet, never a reasonable point of view

@@astralyd no, he's being honest. He just forgot the information, that its the only film he ever saw.

@@astralyd don't feed the troll. let him watch barbie instead

10/10 becausae he makes movies for idiots which most people are

In the words of Barbossa: Me holds are burstin with swag!

Hopefully it didn't cause any movement other than musical movement, to be specific bowl movement hahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahaahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahha

My insides shook so much I shit myself

I really think this film has some of the best sound design ever.

Bro the only time the movie was quiet was for that 90 seconds after the bomb detonated.... before the shockwave hit them.... amazing movie

Where did Tarantino mention Oppenheimer?

@@RM-hb9zeQT doesnt really mention anything on record until hes watched it and waited some time to watch again.

@@gagelindell271 so he didnt really mention it n OP made that up

@@abdullahharoun6680 What? So where is this supposed quote from Tarantino anyways…..i dont see anything at all.

@@RM-hb9ze Tarrantino stated publicly that he saw Oppenheimer at the TCL Chinese IMAX theater in Hollywood last Friday. He has also stated that DUnkirk is one of his favorite films.

Agreed. Ludwig's score just makes your insides throb when paired with each scene. The production level on this film is unreal. Everyone involved should be extremely proud.

or how confusing...

@@1olp1 Agreed, but there are two types of confusion regarding the movies. One is when the story has many holes, or is told very poorly, and the other is when the story is complex. Almost all Nolan movies I've watched is the second one. Think of TENET. Great cast, amazing visuals. But firstly the science is a bit tough to wrap your head around (entropy, etc.), and secondly the timeline confuses people. Now, the rating implies that it is not very well taken by the audience, which I get it. You don't have to like it if you are there to be entertained. But for people like me, it is appreciating to experience what he has to offer. I had to watch almost an hour of UKposts videos regarding entropy to fully understand the physics behind the "time travel". But the beautiful part for me is that every time you watch any of his movies, you pick up new things you never saw before. It's the same movie, but a different experience. I love this interaction with his work, the fact that I can talk about them for hours, the fact that it's not just a movie. It's the portrayal of an idea. I love John Wick as well don't get me wrong. Sometimes I just wanna sit and enjoy a good action sequence. But this, this is more than a movie. I watched Oppenheimer 7 times, only the last time on IMAX, and I can't watch this at home. The experience is just phenomenal...

i gave up on tenet cos i'm a dumbass

@@Centre14don’t think just watch them think enjoy the theatricals

Watch them then think

Don't forget the score!

Agree! Oppenheimer will win them all

Best music

Best supporting actor goes to Ryan Gosling for Ken imo

@@Wayward9how can barbie got the nomination 😂

I was terrified

"Now I become death, destroyer of worlds"

Nolan's films are the reason I still buy Blu-ray because I get the great visual quality and the special features. I have watched all the SF for 'Interstellar' and I hope 'Oppenheimer' has the same.

⁠@@UR_behAviOr_iS_so_tch_hairbandgood idea. I’ll do that too now. And yes the production behind them is so rich ….He’s an artist’s artist.

I was surprised that it was done by Ludwig Göransson. I really fell in love with the music he did for Community back when his career started. Glad his talent got him so far.

Three times here... and it keeps getting better and better..

@@filipezanini413 👍👍👍

@@filipezanini413 4 times for me. 2 times in 70 mm imax. im done now. lol

Yes it was really good

Yeah he killed it. Happy he finally got a really good role, the last one was Blackhawk Down.

I think 5 for me at the moment...probably more coming too

I wouldn't say it's for our hearts. It's a cautionary tale about technology. I mean the scientist thought that the explosion might be so big it set the atmosphere on fire and destroyed the Earth yet they did it anyways.. Christopher Nolan has even said it's a cautionary tale about AI and hopes it makes some people second guess pushing forward so fast. While technology isn't inherently good or evil, this was something that just didn't need to happen or ever be used but hey, war, am I right? AI "could" turn out bad even if the people who make it have good intentions in mind, similar to a nuclear bomb. I don't think we are anywhere close to AI taking over although one of the lead engineers at Google quit because he said their AI was literally scaring him as it started talking about killing humans. Now, it's his word against Google's but I don't think most people give up a probably several million a dollar year salary for 15 minutes in the spotlight either so who knows but he did make it clear that this story mirrored the potential dangers of AI.

They really embellished the right things for the story but didn’t ruin a lot of the timeline that really took place

@@jayfron6012 I agree the did a great job balancing all of it. Hope you got a chance to see my review.

This isn't the place to try to get subscribers

@@guerillagorilla4423in the comments of half hour ad for the movie?😮

@TheRareOne I'm a small channel so I thought sharing with others who may have similar interests may help. Hope you found my video enjoyable

I know I might get some hate for this, but I think the scoring are the worst parts of Nolan's films. It's not that the compositions are bad or the composer is not good: he does very technically and precisely what Nolan asks for. But that's the issue. While Nolan is doing utmost impressive and out there stuff such as making a 3 hour long movie on someone as complex as Oppenheimer, shot entirely on IMAX, with a script that talks about quantum physics written in first person, mixing colour and black and white scenes, doing practical effects on location with both atomic explosions and quantum physics, having unbelievable video editing and never seen before sound design, he STILL insists on having those same generic "epic" Hans Zimmer style scores every movie for the past decade, especially after Inception. I mean, how many times do we still have to hear those "epic" emotional horns? Or those "ticking" anxiety percussions with crescendi? Or those same minor progressions and arpeggios mixing orchestra and vst? I know it's interesting, but maybe the composers should be allowed to have more personality, experiment more, risk more, do something insane, just like he's doing visually. Take Kubrick for instance. The guy was using Bartok, Ligeti, even Stravinsky, for scores! Now, in the movie, you see Oppenheimer himself listening to Stravinsky (of whom he was a fan in real life, having asked for Stravinsky's Requiem Canticle - an avant-garde piece - to be played at his funeral, which did happen), going to Picasso's expositions, having mental breakdowns and visions, having trouble in his personal life, trying to invent new things, inventing the atomic bomb and Nolan thinks the "right" scoring for that must be, for the 138838th time, either Hans Zimmer-like or minimalist? Makes no sense to me. Edit: by the way, I'm not necessarily saying that all scores should necessarily be avant-garde to the point of being completely niche. There are shows such as "Dark" that have strong, experimental, "non-blockbustery" scores that have stuck with the general public very well. If the public can take all of those unusual and provocative elements from Nolan's innovations, I think the score, in the same way, should not be conformist and more of the same.

@@MomentsNotice You won’t get any hate, cause no one wants to read an essay in the comment section of a UKposts video. Idk seems like you and I heard two very different scores, there’s a lot of emphasis on the violin in this score which you can hear in the film and it’s a point that Ludwig and Nolan tried to implement to compliment Oppenheimer. Pretty sure I didn’t hear those intense horns with the scenes with Kitty or Jean or any of the softer moments. Listen to “a Lowly Shoe Salesman”, “Quantum Mechanics”, “Meeting Kitty” or “Oppenheimer” because they’re all different than the generic epic loud Nolan/Zimmer sound as you describe it. While we’re at it, let’s ask Spielberg to stop with the John Williams crap or Hitchcock to stop with the Bernard Herman nonsense. Directors are allowed to stick with what they like.

@MomentsNotice no hate at all and that’s just his style.

@@MomentsNotice i think inception was the last time the score actually served the film. Whereas now it can take away from the experience. I know what you mean.

@@MineCoDewey Is everything okay? Because saying "no one will hate your comment because it's an essay and no one reads essays on UKposts" and then writing precisely an essay hating on my comment seems the most contradictory thing ever. Anyway, I didn't say the score is bad. Quite the contrary. I just said that it doesn't challenge the viewer at all and it doesn't match the dense, complex and troubling essence of the movie that could be expressed in so many other ways. If one can take in all of Nolan's complexities, densities and contradictions for 3 hours, being on the verge of what can be done on film, but thinks tonal arpeggios on a violin or emotional horns are up there with that, I can only hardly disagree. Check out the piece I recommended, "requiem canticles" by Stravinsky - the piece that Oppenheimer, being so troubled, loved and asked for it to be played at his own funeral - and you'll may understand where I'm coming from. Edit: by the way, mentioning John Williams and Bernard Herrmann does nothing against what I said. These two were always allowed to experiment, be complex and go beyond musical clichés whenever it would fit the movie. Just listen to the "Vertigo" soundtrack, or even "Star Wars" or "E.T.", for that matter.

It was good. But it wasnt great. Im a Nolan fan and this was a great film but its not even close to his best.

@@gagelindell271 what is his best for you? Imo Memento is his best. If you say Dark Knight then what's his second best?

@@lokio1890 My favorite that stuck with me the most was Interstellar. Its hard to rate them all but top 2 for me Interstellar, The Dark Knight, The Prestige. Momento would likely land at 4 or 5 next to Inception.

@@lokio1890dark knight is definitely my favorite and this one after it.

@@lokio1890 Dark Knight, Interstellar, and Inception imo (I LOVE Dark Knight Rises with its flaws as well). I still have to watch Memento soon. Honestly, while Oppenheimer was a good movie, I found it to be less impressive in the filmography of Nolan. Better than Dunkirk, probably Tenet too (although I'll rewatch it soon), but The Prestige, Dark Knight Trilogy, Interstellar, and Inception were all better imo.

Cringe

​@@user-vm9we7fs4dBarbie is cringe 🤣

I disagree. Its a good movie but not great.

@@gagelindell271 Thats because you expected a movie, its a historical drama with Nolan's touch.

@@karthikmanikandan5542 No. I knew exactly what I was getting. Thanks. Next!

​@@gagelindell271what would you change?

Ive been telling people it feels like There Will Be Blood meets A Beautiful Mind, good night good luck is a great addition to that comparison

It was 3 hours of closeups on people's faces, endless talking and one cool scene.

@@frankthecat1660 So why did you not turn up the volume in order to follow the story? Have been there any technical issues?

@notknown42 the story followed all the least interesting aspects of the birth of the nuclear bomb; instead was about his boring affair, and some beef he had with Strauss. 😴

@@frankthecat1660 it is a biography, not a solely atomic bomb movie - read the manual before buying.

@@notknown42 yup; a completely boring angle to take, making a not so interesting movie. Nolan's second worst film.

Seen it twice, 2nd time around was even better. I learned a lot about Oppenheimer, before I saw it again. I could easily go again, outstanding movie

I just saw it. Feel it needs multiple viewings. Now wish to read the book, American Prometheus.

Can only recommend it, I went to watch it a second time and managed to catch many small details I missed on the first time.

It sometimes removes any suspension of belief for me. Once I've seen the behind the scenes that's all I see when I watch the movie the next time. Same with bloopers.

@@randomdaveUK I get that, especially with lighting. I'm always like "where's that light coming from its too strong, is it motivated" blah blah blah

I almost shit myself when that happened , somehow I completely forgot about the sound even tho before the flash I was expecting a loud ass bang based on the prior audio levels but I got lost in the visual spectacle that the thought of the obviously immense incoming sound wave somehow passed me by

I came from the movie and I got like so scared and the tension music I jumped too high at the theater like all us

My cinema where I live they cut out the sex part scene but hmm its still good actually. Need rewatch though

yeah a chance out of 1 million

⁠@@paulgerhard5170 - chances are near zero. - NEAR zero? - what do you want from theory alone? - ZERO would be nice!

@@paulgerhard5170 still...let's take that responsibility for the whole planet...they won't mind.