love you too xD

Love the vid!

Spolier: it is not perfect yet but has *A LOT* of potential

Love you and your team!

Arun why did you change your profile pic on UKposts?

Lmao bought account

Imagine everyone using a Smartphone all day... oh wait. It is just normal now.

Yeah but its equally awkward although much common for people having huge devices in front of face recording the birthday! We are already a society of idiots, no harm in going all the way😂

I think you forgot 25 years ago you were blowing out your candles with your father holding a 50cm long cinema camera

There no different when 80s the dad using big ass camera to capture the moment

More like reppeling knowing that you spent 3500$ on modernized google gogles.

and this is not expensive. my laptop and monitor cost about $4000.

Its not like people just gonna walk around in this everywhere.

It's not, it's way easier and seamless to use a regular computer or phone

@@nnnnnn3647 just because you can afford it doesn’t mean it’s not expensive

No you aren't. Stop trying to use your verified channel for likes on low effort comments

You aren’t excited. No one is. We are heading toward a darker path

Me too, streets of Gold , perfect weather , life of peace no more pain death - heaven is going to be great .

@@seven77thunders agreed

good

this presentation just look like a black mirror episode for me

elon musks brain chip thing as well, that's very scary

​@@fireblade156that's ground breaking not scary

Yeah I feel you. I got this exact same feeling with ChatGPT a few moth back too.

@@fireblade156 disabled people very much welcome what you call scary

I know I might be a bad person for saying this, but the 3d recording could be used like all new products for VERY intimate times with your lady or boyfriend, p*rn has pushed all industries, VHS, and internet. imagine you can relive a intimate time with a lady in 3d, or download someone else's....

Ikr...Mkbhd is like my dad and Arun is like my mum...They both are amazing but have diff opinions

@@Lord_englishgent it will be the most godless f***ing losers gathered together since the flashlight

Mkbhd is a snotty chump who has a bad attitude.

@@Lord_englishgent LMAO

Very true

Steve Jobs would be working on holograms over this non sense, a lot of us cant use VR cause we get dizzy and stuff, plus what u say, Steve left a good number of great designers for sure and they've been followed his legacy really good, but we all know the brain there was Steve Jobs, its been literally 12 years since Steve left, at this point we would have MacBooks with fully touchscreen keyboards that resemble a foldable phone, we would have iPhones as thin as a card or a just a transparent screen, we would have holograms, and paper screens all over the world, not a VR headset that obviously will be detrimental to our actual vision, even the Retina display, it improved my visual damage I had with prior retina display computers, still its not perfect and i cant be on the screen all day, imagine having screens in your eyes, theres a reason why developers stopped working on the other VR headsets

There are multiple ways that the human eyes perceive depth. Mainly 2, stereoscopic focus, and idk what to call this but just normal focus, which the eyes adjust by changing the focal length of our eyes. Focusing on things too close to our eyes is not good for our eyes, but VR headsets take care of this as they have a lens in the eyepieces that "move" the screen backwards, so your eyes actually focus farther away. Since VR headsets still don't have varifocal lenses this means that the screen has to be a fixed distance away from your eyes, somewhere between 25 cm and an infinite distance away. Some people feel dizzy or get headaches from VR due to this mismatch of depth info from the stereo focus, and lens focus.

@@ZaidK_ you sound like you should work at one of these headset companies

​​​@@rebel2809 He probably used Ai to blabber this nonsense.

Hey now, don't give them any ideas 😂

@@Nightfox-uv4sefax 😂

I'm sure its Apple proprietary and costs a fortune for a spare battery. Apple charged $699 for roller wheels for the mac pro. If they charge that much for what are essentially $30 suitcase wheels, i imagine the replacement battery will be impressively overpriced.

Genius bar: yeah you just gotta buy a new headset man

@@ExplosionChimp Yup! And you still probably gonna have to pay them "geniuses" at the "Apple bar" an extra 100-150 USD just to de-activate the hardware lock on the battery.. I.e. confirm that it's a genuine spare part replacement.. ; ) And knowing Apple; maybe that's not even gonna be possible.. Perhaps your only possibility for a replacement battery, is to cut the cord, scale back the rubber and hot wire the new one to the stump, hanging off those damn cyclops, lol!

What else were you looking for with an XR/AR device?

This is the ONLY video I watched about it. No need to look further. The quality of this video is amazing. Picks all the right cherries, tastes them and then gives an honest opinion on how they taste.

It will be a niche product for now, but gradually as revisions get cheaper and lighter I think it will become a lot more commonplace

@@TonMachielsen okay lets see these cherries. ohh this one looks proper. *eats*. goddayum... this is fantastic, you can feel every atom in your mouth, but this is concerning, this might replace all the fruits someday because its sooo good...

Especially for those who will watch porn on it. Lets be real here, we all know all the men children are thinking of how to make them into X-ray vision goggles.

​@@earthcoloredeyes5043Only men?

He's got bunch of editors I guess??

How is even possible when a multimillionaire who has editors, scenarist and scripts can stay in front of a camera and read text? Impossible.

@@BlobBlobkinsn‘t be jelly answer: whaaaat I‘m not jelly

He already started the post-production before the embargo lifted

@@BlobBlobkins clearly not impossible

32 likes and 0 replies? let me fix that

Don't read my name...

​​@@Dont_Read_My_Picture stfu you bot

dang

YuGiOh AR when

@Lynn McKenney imagine that even when your mother comes to your house you dont see her but you have two layers of glass and millions of apps between you and her isnt it a bit dystopian?

I am glad that the tech bros are not all super dumb and do not support every technological advancement unconditionally; great that arun can see the downsides also

@@clean280 it depends on the situation

@Lynn McKenney "I feel less isolated when playing vr with friends than when sitting on my couch binge watching tv shows." Yeah, obviously VR feels closer than binge-watching TV. But that is not what people are comparing. It is the playing VR together vs playing a board game, Volleyball, running together, going out to eat together, ... what people are comparing. And in that Case VR is more isolating.

​@Lynn McKenney everything is better with friends

MrWhose should make a video about it too

else not fair

shut up bots

I like how all the little Android users are like, “Uh-oh, Amazon made a one that is cheaper and smarter!!”Dude, you haven't used the Apple one. What do you mean it's smarter? What the hell are you on about, LittleBoy, mfs hate on apple but thats why Samsung innovates so much but still doesn’t sell like apple.

​@@OkaySirimagine getting baited by a bot. Lmao

I didn’t read the whole thing and I’m to lazy to and I loved the part where he said it was worth it

Could become a reality for some, but I truly believe that if apple and other companies can get features like SharePlay to the next level, everything will be fine. We have (at the start of it) doubted every revolutionary piece of tech starting from the invention of fire and guess what, we’ve been fine every time so while there are some worries as long as everything gets fixed, we’ll be just fine, if not doing better.

@@attilaadnanbehbudov3007 Yep agreed. Something is always lost and something is always gained. Our species will be fine.

I'm curious. What do you think came first? The antisocial hermits then the technology? Or did the technology create all of the antisocial narcissist we see now?

@@Gboi8I believe technology did create antisocials. If I give you all the reasons then all I’m gonna say is look at the years before iPhones, iPad’s computers and what not was made. And try to research how human interactions were during that time and compare it to know.

Quest 2

PSVR 2

Sword art online!!

Unfortunately gaming companies don't have hundreds of billions of dollars to develop products like this. That would be awesome though.

@@jradical6458 Literally what meta is doing

valve index smokes it any day

@@WSH3TM Yeah except for it requires base stations so you cant take it anywhere. It requires controllers not just tracks your hands. Doesn’t connect to your social media, texts, FaceTime or calls. The speakers aren’t as good and it doesn’t connect to bluetooth headphones because why would it, you cant take it anywhere. The external cameras aren’t as good and it doesn’t have binaural processing for your outside environment. It doesn’t track your eyes for selecting apps or programs. And it doesn’t have as good resolution. But yeah, other than that, it smokes it. Get off the crack dude.

​@@Gorfvan do you have the Apple Vision already?

​@@Gorfvan quest 2 tracks your hands but ok

fpv goggles use very low computing power

DO NOT BUY VR HEADSETS

@@adamconsidine6384 Too late buckaroo, beside who are you to gatekeep a purchase? :P

@@adamconsidine6384 PSVR2 Is Awesome = VR GAMING is NOW And NOT GONNA SLOW DOWN. Year 2020'S, pondering advances in 2030's-2050's

@@Stephanthecuteblondie2567 DO NOT BUY VR HEADSETS

DO NOT BUY APPLE PRODUCTS

Just tape a iphone on some glasses and there you go. This "VR" is extremely pointless.

@@MaxkillerV2Gaming it's a lot more complicated than that. that's like saying watching a movie with your face touching the TV is the same as watching a 3D movie. regardless, this particular device is pointless because you can get the same thing for a 10th of the price with oculus.

@@MaxkillerV2Gamingsame as smartphones are useless Just carry around your Nokia 1600 or even better, use wired phone. Who needs to walk around with a phone am I right?

@@keane6 You're right this device is pointless, but you missed my point. It literally does everything that a phone can do... But on your face, 3D is a different experience cause it's supposed to look like it's in front of you. This is just a screen on your face that pretty much does anything a phone can do. The worst part you can still see around you, people can see the eyes which much make people look goofy, it has a lower battery life than a actual phone and Apple want $3500 for this?

@@MaxkillerV2Gaming have you ever actually used a vr/ar device? it's not just a screen on your face. that would be an awful experience. it's designed in a way that gives depth perception, in a way that a 2d screen can't replicate

DO NOT BUY VR HEADSETS

@@adamconsidine6384Buy them

@@adamconsidine6384why not?

I will say that he just has a tripod set up, and the editing in the panning in, he does have good videography and skin color grade, but he is definitely just multicam on premiere + stock footage and images from internet, none the less quality content

@@Delta806 cus hes scared of them or whatever

its a bilion dollar industry, they have thought out everything from what we have now till the future. they discus this daily in the office and at home. its crazy what their hidden projects could be, pretty scary tbh

Except other companies developed this technology first..

@@NeonVisual which?

​@@its_sanddi8194 LespMotion bought it to market over a decade ago. Companies like Varjo have had it in VR headsets for years. Typical apple fanboyism, believe everything they are told and then think they have some kind of miracle product, when in fact it's just cobbling together other people's technology. To be clear, this headset does nothing that existing VR headsets are already doing, except this one forces you to be tethered to a box on your waist like a colostomy bag. The only exception to that is a pointless battery wasting LCD screen on the front of the device to fake eyes of the wearer. It's a nonsense product, with a nonsense price which not even the most hard core VR fan is going to buy. Apple positioning this as "the future of phones and computing" shows just how out of touch they are in a VR market that has already flopped. This happens once every 10 years or so. A product comes along which is the latest the history of failed products in the catagory like 3D TV's and movies with glasses. Always they fail to address the baseline flaws. In Fruit Co's case they still havn't fixed VR's primary flaws, namely no one can strap one of these to their faces for longer than 30 minutes before they become painful and cause tension headaches. VR also can't give an immersive experience so long as the visual definition is lower than that of simply looking at something with your eyes, and the biggest drawback of them all is that VR doesn't use plenoptic depth of field which is vital for humans to gauge distance and focus. So far Lightfield is the only VR company to create true VR with plenoptic focus. Everything else just layers depth like stacking playing cards, it doesn''t work and causes headaches and sickness.

@@NeonVisual ofc others have made it first, its not about who developed it first, its about who makes it the best or mainstream

It is still in development for another year, they announced it a year early so all type of app developers make apps for it

Imma stop you right there incorrect you this is an AR product not VR. Don't get it twisted 0:24

Every time you put VR you did a disservice to the VR community

@@DontRemoveDontRemove Nah, it’s a vr/ar product. You can dim the outside camera from 100% to 0%, depending on how immersed you want to be in a virtual experience.

The Virtuality was radical

You already said it, there's valve, vive and oculus.. Apple likes to do their own thing and keep it within their ecosystem. With many apple users, I'm sure this will be a success.

Exactly because it’s basically just the oculus quest 2

If you count that even Steam has only 120 million registered users, but Apple alone on just iPhone has 1.5 billions active users that is 12x more like the whole Valve community.. so even if there are more supported brands on the others the combined reacheable persons still way less there compared to Apple. And developers making money based on the reacheable amount of users.. more user more chance to get their money (not to mention that Apple users have the highest pay potential, like half amount of users compared to Google, but still doubled amount of yearly profit, which is the 15%-30% cut off from the price, so actually part of the money what the developers earned there.. and the doubled amount of profit for Apple means that developers are also earned doubled amount of money there..)

I completely agree. I wouldn't be surprised if Apple forced people to use Facetime, or an Apple keyboard/mouse/phone to fully use the headset. I really hope that they don't force people to do it but it seems likely

My main concern is your comment

A few of the early hands-on first looks said they got nauseated using it, but the Apple handlers were swearing up and down that it won't be a problem for release, so it sounds like they've got a solution for it, but it's not quite "there" yet, tho should be fixed by launch.

Exactly. It’s not the screen that’s necessarily the issue, but focusing on something closely for too long. With VR headsets, they’re designed so you focus as you normally would, as if the object was really there in the world.

I don’t remember getting any eye strain while using my quest 2 so i should be fine with this

Oh I'm sure they would've promoted the shit out of it if they actually put that much effort into not straining your eyes. Nothing wrong in that though, this the one of the biggest problem with VR

This is the main reason why I stopped using VR, hopefully apple can fix the motion sickness that comes with using VR for too long

thats ambitious 😆🤣

Spolier: it is not perfect yet but has *A LOT* of potential

I disagree

I dissagree

It would have been better if they called it "Eye Mac"

Don't read my name...

a copy of other vr headsets on the market is truely innovation

Bhai badiya roast video bana na jaake

Mrwhosetheboss is my inspiration my parents said if I get 5k subs they buy me a mic, begging u guys, literally begging .

there's not that many videos so like...

speaking of lidar... yeah you know the increased in horror if they use this in a maze edited: or in a set place

Who asked lil bro?

The individual components (VR, AR, gestures, etc.) have mostly been around for more than 10 years. The breakthrough was Apple's silicon to bring them all together in a wearable but performant package.

5 years ago 80% of this were already on other headsets. Lol

Did people forget google glass?

Oculus rift came out 9 years ago

@@lokanantazain the AR was not like this at all, not even close

future Military use as well. pilot a drone or an f16 from the headset while having a brew at Starbucks

Another possibility would be to send sophisticated robots to Mars and equip them with high resolution cameras so we could move around the surface of the red planet right from Earth via wearable tech like the Apple Vision Pro, perhaps even build a base there so that when the first humans arrive our accommodations are ready. We'd have to tweak the time lag of send and receive, but that's probably right around the corner too, judging how we eventually overcome limitations how ever impossible or improbable they seem at present.

@@robm3569 Unless we are about to learn how to send and receive data faster than light, this wouldn't really work as a method of controlling a robot on Mars.

Great! I bet NASA will order like... 10 of them!

@@robm3569 Umm... tweaking the lag of send and receive is literally impossible. Can´t go any faster than the speed of light...

For me, i feel like something like this is mostly best worn maybe when you just wanna play video games or watch movies because it’s not proper to wear something like this to your job or in a meeting lol people won’t take you seriously.

@@KingChiChi20 slow person I see.

you couldn't have explained it better, i agree with you.

I don't understand. How is this any different from other VR headsets? You're still not going to be able to wear this for more than an hour without your head sweating. If you want something to be scared of, we already have smartwatches that record raw brain data and feed it to whatever apps you give permission to.

we will never be ready for it

Maybe it's old people that get creeped out but anyone who's played a video game in the last 20 years won't be disturbed by a 3D avatar.

@Vinny Veritas well, I'm 38, Played lots of games in the past and it's still eerie to me. And no I am not afraid of horror movies or the like. They're cheesecake. This however is giving me goosebumps and I can't really explain to you why. But I am not the only one.

I don’t think anyone is going to wear this in a social environment. But for office work in some closed space with huge screens or also travel and couch entertainment this is going to be huge. It maximizes the experience, while minimizing distractions and overcoming technological limitations of 2D and small screen size. Allowing for interruptions by others and showing responsiveness via digital eyes only makes this a valid option for work in shared space, but surely no one intends to wear it for longer conversations or in daily life. Also the 3D Camera thing of capturing an experience and playing it back as well as never before, is a gimmick for now that won’t be used much. But be prepared for iPhones to receive 3D cameras as well, because they will likely remain the no1 recording device, while the vision will set the standard for the viewing experience, especially when the more affordable version gets released then.

"making memories" when holding a phone in front of your face to record them: yess!!!! "making memories" when having goggles on your face that lets other people see you and you see them: noooo muh black mirror!!! still, it's gonna be a while until these are actual glasses that dont make you look like a dork lmao

@@SnrubSource yes, it is different. A phone is mostly in the hands of people, without interfering face to face interaction too much. These goggles are different there. Also when u are talking about glasses, then you mean a completely different product that Apple so far did not choose to develop and flopped for Google.

I'm first guys

Like legit, I can buy a pretty good VR Setup With that amount of money, all the bells and whistles included with maybe some leftover for games.

What problems are they solving? The screen can’t be that good if you can see through it, with power like this games could be played but knowing apple, they would screw that up, This is useless

@@joeygil-hz9kvthe display is way beyond any vr headset on the market it seems, and it’s. Stand alone computer as well

@@adiskrdzic6937 you sure? Nothing about it being 8k, or even 4k yet, also seeming like the screen won’t have such a good contrast with darks

Bot did you say ? 🤖

I think it's actually upcoming but don't quote me

It's on YT btw if you didn't find it

@sixteen more bots

Don't read my name..

This is a bot post

@@Adam-vx6to no

​@@Dont_Read_My_Picture aight

the AMZT30 is imaginary, i can't find it ANYWHERE on the internet. Not even a tweet about it.

bot

Don't read my name...😊

Actually smart by them to push it same day, I like this more

huh? whats the amzt30 thingy the comments are mentioning

@@carticactus how?

you know this headset will harm eyes?

also my father lives in 19th century he says we didn't had mobile back then why u using it so much and not going outside. so I said then you don't know what gadgets more are coming

Don't read my name..

Selling fakecoins on this channel? Oh wauw. What does it pay to push these nonsense? I also want to sell my sole.

@@rajveerkanojiya2985 Bro’s father lived in the 1800s xd

I agree with you but I would had hope Aron to cover the security and privacy risk for the consumer with this product.

@@miguelarias3484 Yes, this is next level stalking!

i think what will happen is people see the vision pro and try enter the vr market and buy a cheaper headset (for average people)

Some people are gonna make the craziest porn that's ever existed.

@@theprocat719 Ohhh, imagine if they cannot watch movies or do anything together due to the fact that they have different branded headsets. That's more than likely to happen and very typical

Known? According to who? What evidence points to the idea that Apple is exploiting user data lol.

Same thing I'm thinking after how the cameras see so much it sounds to me like how Alexa will supposedly listens even when it's off Or maybe I'm just a anti tech nut job who doesn't trust corporations Well see I guess

@@jman617 Alexa needs to listen even when it's off, otherwise it can't hear the audio prompt that boots it. You're not an anti-tech nutjob, most people are outright ignorant on these types of things or will give up literally anything for convenience.

I still trust apple more than most companies with this kind of device, imagine what Facebook or Google would do with information from a device like this

@@IceYetiWins yeah that's true

It makes zero difference if your eyes are visible or not.

@@damazywlodarczyk id assume he was joking….

@@damazywlodarczyk For you, perhaps. Maybe millions like you. But, for millions of others, it makes a world of difference. In fact eye contact is critical to most humans. What the Vision Pro is doing could stand a lot of improvement, but I predict this is another thing that all headsets will have inside of 5 years.

@@TheHardcard considering what the goal of most other headsets are (entertainment for a single person, especially video games) i doubt any other headsets are gonna use this concept for quite a while lol

​@@TheHardcardIf you were carrying a long conversation. Why wouldn't you just take off the headset?

Learning is always a profoundly lonely experience

@@frozenwindow407 it’s often an internal process and may seem lonely at times , but social connections and community can have a profound effect.

Education? Most education systems get the cheapest of the cheap even with laptops, it feels like we are ten product generations away from this being an option.

@@Alias_Anybody it will depend on the school - we are using HoloLens 2 devices and VR Headsets for some courses already. The challenge with the Apple headsets is that I don’t know if I can share one unit across multiple students. Even years ago - we would have expensive equipment - but it had to be shared.

@@LearningandTechnology Are you talking about college or university level? Primary and middle schools most likely not only won't be able to afford it unless they are extremely bougie, the students will also physically destroy them in no time.

I can only imagine the toxic EMFs being emitted by the vision pro in the long term, with close proximity to the brain. Just 15 minutes are enough to alter brain waves to abnormal For those that are ignorant on the new warnings on all cellphones not to place phone next to ear, look it up. Even the WHO has classified RF EMFs as a Class 2b carcinogen. We pretend to believe that natural EMF from the sun is the same as random, chaotic RF frequencies on the biofield, they are not.

Agreed. People aren't talking about how straining it is to put a screen right in front of your face. If you want to be immersed in a lakeside experience just go to a lake haha

Can I take this skiing?

While I personally haven't found any issues with eye strain and isolation, I have found a major issue with heavy/uncomfortable goggle. Everything about the Vision Pro can be completely ruined if your head starts feeling strained after an hour or two.

This very much seems like a beta product, they know there's going to be a small market for a headset that's $3500

DO NOT BUY VR HEADSETS

@@adamconsidine6384 Too late buckaroo, beside who are you to gatekeep a purchase? :P

bro targeted mkbhd

Well then, you're the target audience for these types of videos 🖐️

Thats why, Hestheboss

Don't read my name..

Idk how you make a $3500 purchasing decision without understanding specs, that's fucking wild

arun*

Arun*

in order to justify the $3500 sticker price, it better can do everything that macbook or imac can do. if it stuck to only the thing that Ipad can do, then $3500 can't be justified. after all, it was priced as a professional publishing machine like Macbook or iMac.

Don't read my name...

@@humbleindian6303maybe start to get your grammar correct before commenting on someones downfall?😂

Why?

It looked like he did something weird

Why Meta flopped

As a gamer I cannot think of the possibilities Imagine FPS games on this. Ganes would be so life-like and amazing. It's not a pathetic excuse like the metaverse. And has some actual computer power and competence. But I couldn't ever comprehend to buy it lol maybe in the future.

Where going to live in a dystopian reality

macOS openness to tweak things? What world do you live in? Appleland?

​@@BroBytesBhaimore open compared to iOS

Boy u aint concerned bout nothing u just want one of these headsets dont u

@@bloodstainedramparts6631 🗿this had me 💀

@@Respok 🤣🤣🤣

Same!

why would you care if someone was living in a 3d model of your room? its not physically bothering you is it

How much have you lost? Be honest 😂

Bot did you say ? 🤖

Amazon bots lol

i just googled what you said, this thing doesn't exist, wtf are you talking about?

​@@PancakeBoi same