Cause the leather glove that shrunk from getting wet didn't fit

Right?! Especially after how he's behaved since. ☹️

Race played into it as well.

There are many people on death row that were convicted on far less evidence than that of OJ's.

He was acquitted in the criminal trial ("beyond a reasonable doubt") and adjudicated guilty in the civil trial ("a preponderance of evidence"). Justice was served; just not the way some of you wanted. Remember: Benjamin Franklin said that it was better than ten guilty men go free than one innocent man hang. Otherwise, our judicial process would have been the same as England's.

Scott (and posse) are humorous, respectful, and tasteful. I just worry that he and whoever is in tow take too many risks to their safety like standing in the middle of blind curve lanes of traffic to bring us a video share.

Always so respectful and there is no one I trust more on LA crime and drama

On these videos yes. On the Find a death write ups not so much lol

Maybe it's time to visit her grave again to tell her the news. I believe everything felt into place. God decided to take OJ from earth.

Very kind of you

I went to Highschool with Nicole's younger sister. I grew up in Dana Point. That was very kind that you brought flowers to Nicole's grave site ❤

​@@TheNewsAnchorYouTrustin which case god didn't allow him to goto prison either

@@70elcamino57wrong. He did go to prison for theft for several years. Not the murder charge , but he was found guilty in a civil suit. And later confessed and laughed about it in third person. OJ is burning in hell.

Prefect❤

I totally agree.

Ultimate Justice reigns where OJ is now.... better than the so-called justice on earth ❤✝️⚖️❤

Fred Goldman hounding him constantly for his money was pretty just punishment. Hitting him where he really lived

​@ambermchugh9381 a hollow victory for Fred, though.

​@@kati1669This was the comment I was looking for Kati. Surprised it took so long to find. Blessings.

Every year when the anniversary shows up of his death will hear about it on the news

It was news. Hence the media coverage.

@@TheHarryleemartinyeah but they are accusing Scott of being crass about the loss of life, making money off it, while they are doing that on a huge scale.

@@dougspidermanhappy No reporter or anchor said he was crass. They reported on tours and other interest by the general public. The difference is one is journalism, reporting on events of the day.

I wish you we're doing what you used to do! It was on my bucket list to go on your tour! ❤

@@TheHarryleemartin STUPID

That's because both cases were hoaxes and media events. Psyops.

My mum was very into the trial, watched every day sky news, I was twelve at time on school holidays, I remember verdict so well😮

Our justice system needs a complete overhaul.

Our system is wholly and completely corrupt

Great point. So many people cast blame on the jurers in that trial. Calling them racist. But when you think about it This trial exposed to white people, that even a black man who could easily afford these high priced lawyers can get off scott free- even though millions of white would not have.

You could commit 1st degree murder and get a suspended sentence in TX in the 50s or 60s if you worked for LBJ. Look up Mac Wallace. That said It's still going on today, it's almost worse because many of the politically connected crimes are just ignored and never even prosecuted anymore or if you're on the opposite side you get a kangaroo court where you aren't allowed to mount a defense.

house was not properly collected and entered into the chain of custody when it was first located. Although it was documented in his notes by Detective Mark Fuhrman, one of the first to arrive on the scene, no further action was taken to secure it. The detectives who took over Fuhrman’s shift apparently were never aware of the print and eventually, it was lost or destroyed without ever being collected. Other items of evidence were also never logged or entered into the chain of custody, which gave the impression that sloppy forensic collection had been carried out at the scene. The prosecution had expert witnesses who testified that the evidence was often mishandled. Photos were taken of critical evidence without scales in them to aid in measurement taking. Items were photographed without being labeled and logged, making it difficult, if not impossible, to link the photos to any specific area of the scene. Separate pieces of evidence were bagged together instead of separately, causing cross-contamination. Wet items were also packaged before allowing them to dry, causing critical changes in evidence. Police even used a blanket that came from inside the house to cover Nicole Brown’s body, contaminating the body and anything surrounding it. Beyond poor evidence collection techniques, sloppy maneuvering at the scene caused more bloody shoe prints to be left behind by LAPD than by the perpetrator. Securing the Evidence Throughout the investigation, there were issues with how evidence was secured. There was about 1.5 mL of O.J. Simpson’s blood assumed missing from a vial of evidence. The LAPD could not counter the idea of “lost blood” because there was no documentation of how much reference blood was taken from Simpson as evidence. The person who drew the blood could only guess he had taken 8 mL; only 6 mL could be accounted for by the LAPD. To add to the problem, the blood was not immediately turned over as evidence but was carried around for several hours before it was entered into the chain of custody, allowing for speculation of when and how the 1.5 mL of blood may have disappeared. The security of LAPD storage and labs was also brought under scrutiny when it was discovered that some pieces of evidence had been accessed and altered by unauthorized personnel. Simpson’s Bronco was entered at least twice by unauthorized personnel while in the impound yard; Nicole Simpson’s mother’s glasses had a lens go missing while it was in the LAPD facility. A Question of Planted Evidence Not only were there many claims that the evidence was mishandled in the police lab but there were also claims that evidence was planted at the crime scene. Because the police department did not have proper collection documents regarding Simpson’s blood, it was argued that the police planted Simpson’s missing blood on critical evidence and in critical areas of the murder scene. The defense team stated that EDTA was found in the samples of blood that were collected at the crime scene. EDTA is a blood fixer (anticoagulant) used in labs and mixed with collected blood. If evidence with Simpson’s blood showed traces of EDTA, the defense claimed, then that blood had to have come from the lab, which meant that it was planted. However, EDTA is also a chemical found naturally in human blood and chemicals such as paint. At the time, tests were not readily available to differentiate between natural and contaminant EDTA or the differences in the level of EDTA in blood. Some believe that the positive EDTA results may have been due to contamination of the equipment used to run the tests. A Question of Character Detective Fuhrman was discredited by the prosecution when he was alleged to be a racist and accused of planting evidence. When asked if he had falsified police reports or planted evidence in the Simpson case, he invoked his 5th Amendment rights against self-incrimination. Fuhrman was accused of planting critical evidence, contaminating it with Simpson’s blood, and falsifying police records. In Fuhrman’s book, he stated that at one point he was even accused of killing Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman himself. This put anything he touched in the investigation under scrutiny. Understanding Forensic Science A major hurdle that the prosecution team failed to overcome was the lack of knowledge and understanding regarding forensics, specifically the relatively new science of DNA. The jurors agreed that the DNA testimony was difficult to appreciate since expert witnesses were not able to put their evidence in terms that the jury could understand. This inability to understand key evidence made the evidence essentially useless; even some seasoned lawyers found the scientific testimonies to be incomprehensible. It is reported that the DNA evidence showed that the chance that some of the blood found near the bodies came from anyone but Simpson was 1 in 170 million. The chance that blood found on Simpson’s sock could be from someone other than Nicole Brown was 1 in 21 billion. Blood samples found inside of Simpson’s Bronco, which was discovered outside Simpson’s home the next day, were equally matched to Simpson and both victims. Such evidence should have resulted in an open and shut case by today’s standards but was not made clear enough to understand at the time. What happened in the trial of O.J. Simpson that led to his acquittal? The role of the jury is to listen to both sides of the case (prosecutor and defense). The jurors have to unanimously decide guilt or innocence. Whatever the outcome, the jurors must feel that their decision is beyond a reasonable doubt. This was particularly difficult to achieve in this case. Going in, the public were already influenced by Simpson’s likeability and star power as a pro football player and beloved celebrity. Changing that initial perception was going to be tough. While the abundance of evidence certainly provided more than enough to do so, the doubts cast by the sloppy police work were enough of a window

Imagine knowing not only that your best friend is a vicious murderer but that you might have gotten him off and now have to act like everything is cool. Or that you just sent your best friend to prison. Very conflicting emotions. I don't envy him. He seemed like a nice enough guy although I can't stand his ex wife and daughters tv show

@@ambermchugh9381 Same here. Can't stand the family but I remember reading he was decent. There is a scene in the FX series where he takes his kids to breakfast and says something like "we are Kardashians, we don't do immoral things for money". Later on he did interviews where he stated he had been friends for years but no longer and he felt he was guilty.

@@RadioLaPrincess Iam very surprised to hear that. I assumed he knew or thought he was guilty. Hysterical quote from the mom who got rich marketing her daughters sex tape.

@@ambermchugh9381 I was too, which is why it stood out to me. But yeah after watching the show I got the feeling he was a decent guy, however I do not feel the same about his family.

I noticed that. He was stunned and upset.

and we never Thank You enough. Thanks Scott.

Scott's voice still sounds the same too! He should do voice over work.

That expert that picked the jury really won the case. The prosecution bored them and talked over their heads for like 9 months

I think Judge Ito made a mistake in having the trial on TV. It should have been a closed hearing. RIP Nicole and Ron.

@@shannonk.6528 definitely

Another wanna be celebrity. The whole trial was a joke.

He's a straight up psychopath who got away with murder

And Nicole

They were a pair of drug addicts who were killed over an unpaid drug debt. That American mafia you people are so proud of? There were multiple attackers seen leaving the house.

I wonder if an autopsy will show that CTE concussion damage

Karma is about the living, unless we're talking about reincarnation, and the last thing I hope is that he'll be back some day! No thanks! I wished I believed in a here after and that there was some reward or punishment after we're dead, but I don't. This ride is it. Try and do your best because there are no exchanges, returns or refunds.

@@k2sworld agreed. Karma did take a bite out of that man. He really thought life would just go on as before.

@@ambermchugh9381 I read that his family had refused it.

​@@ambermchugh9381That is what I wonder too.we have seen former pro football players that have had violent outbursts and committed murder and suicide. Great insight!

No because She was White. Oj black

Yeap! Evidence all pointed to him all but leaving his Heisman Trophy at the crime scene. Let's don't forget the 911 calls Nicole made with "him" screaming and threatening her. Wonder why he didn't do something anything at all to look for the "killer".... just saying.

Except for the (and he did it) part, I agree with everything you said. We can have our opinions, but to state them as fact... especially about something so horrific... is, in my opinion, wrong. It's not for me to judge. That's what courts are for. Sadly, more times than not, they don't care much about justice or truth.

​@@k2sworld My belief he was guilty had no bearing on whether he did it or not. But I can still have an opinion on whether he slaughtered those innocent people or not. I stated (and he did it) because I'm Captain Obvious and yes he did it because that's my opinion. It won't change anything. But that won't stop me from voicing my moot opinion. All 3 parties are now dead and nothing will bring them back. It's a sad and tragic story. Let's close the book on it.

Wow….that’s a red flag of 0 empathy

Or knowing your time has come and your life has been destroyed and you're friendless make person dead inside

​@@godzillamanstreb524 or depression

Soul less

I hope your sister is doing ok. Wishing her all the best❤

👍

ive seen pictures of the crime scene with the bodies there too. it was messy, she had been stabbed/slashed so bad on her neck that her head was almost off.

I'm not surprised at all that Trump and Simpson would be hanging out together.

Payback for Rodney King. 9 black jurors out of 12. Hmmmm

@@J-CNick92106 and a racist cop on the scene that nobody could then trust.. racism breads racism and then everyone suffers 😞

They selected and then took advantage of the stupidity of the black jurors.

@@hanselmansell7555: The same racist cop that helped prove the innocence of Arrick Harris, an "African-American" male who Fuhrman believed had been falsely implicated for murder? That racist cop?

@@marcopolo-xj4yw who? The prosecution? And don't you mean the stupidity of 'the' jurors?

He asked to leave the restaurant early, went home to shower and change and then walked to the condo to return the glasses. They were not intimate on that evening.

I heard the same thing. Ron was in the wrong place at the wrong time

God bless the victims 😢🙏🙏

I think he was romantically interested in her. There isn't one thing wrong with that. They were both good looking and single. The glasses being returned was an excuse to see an enchanting woman he met on the job. Unfortunately he ran into a crazy murderer. Isn’t it a shame he didn’t arrive sooner and was able to save her like in the movies?

the glasses belonged to her mother, not Nicole. So I can understand why she wanted to get them back quickly for her mom.

It was news.

This was a slaughter by someone's hand....but ok with the edgy comment....

Me too!!

The press was mad because every vehicle driving thru with “site seers” blocked their cameras or interrupted their recordings.

You are very kind. Thank you.

A bedpost from Rock Hudson's death bed. Thanks!

Part of why it became such a drama was that they preempted the soap operas and we just watched this real life drama instead. All the networks competing for the most salacious bits

It broke on the 13th? There were a lot of 9's, 13's and 33's surrounding the OJ situation...

No one will.

I appreciate you choosing mine. I agree about the families.

Exactly what i have always said. Also, he slayed his fingers out OVER rubber gloves

You're saying 'both' of the gloves found in two different places SHRUNK that much🤨! The prosecution 'probably' DID consult a leather Expert, so, guess WHY they 'DIDN'T' call a leather expert as a 'witness'??? Does every owner of gloves have to replace them when they get Wet!? Because they 'Won't' fit the owner???🤔✊🏿💯✊🏿

@@davidwicks9538 If you recall the trial, when they gave him the gloves to put on, he splayed out his hands, and that with the shrinkage, no wonder they didn't fit properly, AND he wore latex gloves as well, which would also throw off the fit of the glove but his hand did get into the glove. I have experience working leather... and yes, two different gloves can shrink the same if they were both wet. But, most of all, the gloves didn't have to fit perfectly... as it was a crime of passion, he probably grabbed the first pair of gloves he found. He did it, without question... and I will NOT miss him.

@LadyDragonsblood Now, he grabbed the first pair of gloves he could find, annnd... a 🔪 that hasn't been found, left his home to kill Nicole; I guess he would pick a pair of "leather" gloves with No lining, out of his Vast collection of gloves to assure they wouldn't fit with latex gloves on, if caught...Right! The prosecution, You recall, choose this demonstration...???? Are 'YOU' an adult?? Do You realize how 'Ignit' you sound???✊🏿💯✊🏿

My moms bday is June 12th too, she turned 39 that day

At that point we couldn't. They sealed off the streets for blocks. They had police stationed in front of Bundy and pulled people over for even touching their brakes, claiming they were impeding traffic. Which they were.

The hearses were not air-conditioned. A summer fact people forgot. But they sure looked good.

@@DearlyDepartedTours well, we usually came in April so the weather conditions were very good!! ☺️

His obit was one I read with a smile.

@@CaseyHarrisSr Me too. I think he died of a brain tumor.

If 'You' drove the route from Nicoles residence, the murder scene, to OJs house, how long (in minutes) did it take? Assuming "YOU" took the correct route!! "YOU'RE SURE he did it! RIGHT??? ... After "YOUR" research, DO You find it peculiar, that NOBODY saw 👀OJ coming or returning🤨!?!??? Especially when/or "IF" he crossed San Vincente Bl.!! *TWICE* 🤔...Jis' Sayin'... ✊🏿💯✊🏿