One Hour Of Mind-Blowing Mysteries Of The Atom | Full Documentary

  Переглядів 1,305,361

Big Scientific Questions

Big Scientific Questions

День тому

Have you ever found yourself pondering the mysteries of the atom? In this documentary, we're diving into some of the most thought-provoking questions that bridge the gap between the microscopic world of atoms and the expanse of the universe.
Energy Source for Electron Movement:
One of the wonders of atomic structure is how electrons orbit the nucleus. But where do these tiny particles get the energy to perform this intricate dance? We'll delve into the fascinating mechanisms that fuel electron motion.
The Birth of the First Atom:
Ever wondered how the very first atoms formed? Join us as we explore the cosmic timeline and the events that gave rise to the building blocks of matter after the Big Bang.
Touching Atoms: Myth or Reality?
Do atoms ever truly touch each other? Discover the surprising truth behind atomic interactions and the forces that come into play when particles get close.
Identity of Identical Atoms:
Are two atoms of the same element truly identical? We'll delve into the atomic world to uncover the subtle differences that can exist even within the same element.
Colorful Atoms?
Can atoms have colors? While atoms themselves aren't colorful in the visible spectrum, they can exhibit fascinating light-related behaviors that we'll explore.
Overcoming Proton Repulsion:
The positively charged protons in an atomic nucleus should repel each other due to their like charges. Explore the powerful force that prevents them from flying apart.
Proton's Size Unveiled:
How big is a proton? We'll zoom in to the subatomic level and discuss the dimensions of these fundamental particles that play a crucial role in atomic nuclei.
Solidity in Empty Space:
If atoms are mostly empty space, how can objects appear and feel solid? Join us to unravel the mysteries of solidity in the midst of atomic emptiness.
The Dance of Atoms - Formation of Molecules:
Why do atoms come together to form molecules? Discover the intricate chemistry behind the bonds that unite atoms into the diverse molecules we encounter.
Neutron Stars - Giants of Nuclear Matter:
Is a neutron star akin to a colossal atom? We'll explore the extreme conditions of these celestial wonders and their relationship to atomic structures.
A Universe Within an Atom:
Imagine the universe as an atom. Could there be a connection between the macroscopic and the microscopic? We'll embark on a speculative journey into this intriguing concept.
Atoms After Life:
Ever wondered what happens to your atoms after you pass away? We'll discuss the fate of the atoms that once composed your body and their journey through the natural cycle.
Eternal Existence of Atoms:
Do atoms last forever? Uncover the changes atoms undergo through various processes and consider the intriguing concept of their enduring nature.
Thank you for joining us on this captivating exploration of atoms and the universe. We hope this video sparks your curiosity and provides a deeper understanding of the mysteries that shape our reality. Don't forget to like, subscribe, and hit the notification bell for more captivating content.
Chapters:
00:00 Introduction
00:39 Where Do Electrons Get Energy To Spin Around An Atom's Nucleus?
05:34 How Did the First Atom Form?
13:55 Do Atoms Ever Actually Touch Each Other?
17:37 Are Two Atoms of The Same Element Identical?
21:18 Does an Atom Have a Color?
25:56 Why Don't Protons Repel Each Other Out Of The Nucleus?
29:22 How Big Is a Proton?
33:31 If Atoms Are Mostly Empty Space, How Can Things Be Solid?
36:23 Why Do Atoms Form Molecules?
41:43 Is a Neutron Star Just One Giant Atom?
46:18 What If The Universe is An Atom?
50:41 What Happens to Your Atoms After You Die?
57:19 Do Atoms Last Forever?

КОМЕНТАРІ: 1 800
@welshblackbees
@welshblackbees 3 місяці тому
As a child I was not allowed to study physics, it was a case of ‘only study what you’ve already scored highly on’ rather than subjects that excited me - without physics I just didn’t get any sense out of chemistry either (maybe it was just bad teaching, who knows now?) but, at a couple of weeks off 70 years old I’m still fascinated and learning all I can. As a child I remember clinging to the saddle of an out of control, galloping horse and another time being chased by a dog and gamekeeper through the whipping twigs of a forest and later laughing out loud and shedding tears of delight at the birth of my sons and, you know, watching this video delivered up bits of all that rolled into one. Thank you so very much, will have to watch this again and again. Absolutely knackered now 😄
@jeremyjessie568
@jeremyjessie568 2 місяці тому
Èèèèèèè😅
@railwaymechanicalengineer4587
@railwaymechanicalengineer4587 2 місяці тому
You must have gone to school in the USA, that's their wicked way of "Dumbing the kids down". The truth about this whacky "CLICK BAIT" programme is that the power necessary is Electricity, as the whole Universe & everything in it runs on electricity flowing in Plasma. You only have to ask the correct branch of Science. The Institute for Electricity (IEEE), to get at the known proven facts. Astronomers & Physicists have NO qualifications in "Electrical Behaviour" so are literally living in the dark on this one !!!
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 2 місяці тому
Thank you so much. It's truly inspiring to hear how, even after all these years, your curiosity and passion for learning, especially in physics, remain undiminished. Your enthusiasm is a reminder that learning knows no age. Happy birthday! 😊
@mithrasrevisited4873
@mithrasrevisited4873 2 місяці тому
That is the good thing as an adult you have access to so much more on youtube and other on line science
@coopmuzzy75
@coopmuzzy75 2 місяці тому
Once you open this door you can't get enough. Astrophysicists are just curious minds like us. They are just much better at math.lol. once I started gobbling these theories up saw that my own simple mind had similar thoughts. And all of the science still leans heavily on theory when applied to the universe. The greatest minds still don't know the answers. And most likely never will.
@genaugmen4505
@genaugmen4505 7 місяців тому
The repulsive force of 2 protons in a nucleus is 20lbs. That's unbelievable. And the strong force is a hundred times stronger!!! That certainly helps bring into perspective the type of energy bound up in atoms. That is probably the most profound piece of information I've acquired in years!!
@genaugmen4505
@genaugmen4505 6 місяців тому
@@UnitSe7en I actually meant the strong force. I don't know how that came out as it did.
@jdlech
@jdlech 5 місяців тому
Only about 4 to 6 percent of the fissionable material in a nuclear bomb reacts. The other ~95% gets vaporized without contributing to the reaction.
@stana1278
@stana1278 4 місяці тому
20 lbs is unbelievable. And also untrue. It's closer to 1 millionth of a Newton. Still impressing, but nowhere close to 20 lbs
@Tampabman
@Tampabman 4 місяці тому
Thank you! I love learning stuff like this!
@mihailcirlig8187
@mihailcirlig8187 4 місяці тому
​@@jdlechThat's why modern atomic bombs are always two fases, the first is fission to create enough heat to trigger a fusion reaction which is the true powerhouse of the bomb and doesn't have a theoretical limit
@kevindarter822
@kevindarter822 6 місяців тому
I really like this. These fundamental concepts are not often discussed deeply like this at one shot. Bravo. Well organized.
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 5 місяців тому
Thank you so much😊
@Draakie100
@Draakie100 7 місяців тому
I hope that one day (soon) more people will truly understand what an absolute privilege it is to be alive and to be part of our magical and wonderful universe...our planet would be a much better place (jmho). When I was a child my physics teacher told me that all the atoms in my body came from different stars and I was "hooked on" our amazing universe. I thank you for this informative, fun, and beautiful upload...and I hope that our universe is kind to you all 🌎☮
@brendansherlock6442
@brendansherlock6442 6 місяців тому
Yep, the creator did the impossible, I'm thankful to the creator 😊
@DistinctiveBlend
@DistinctiveBlend 4 місяці тому
@@brendansherlock6442 yeah after reading a well thought out comment I figured there would be some dimwitted religious nonsense replying to it. Thanks for not disappointing, also your favorite fanfic claims your creator made humans from dirt with magic.
@magnuskallas
@magnuskallas 4 місяці тому
Yup. Religion is a dangerous thing.
@jamieb3071
@jamieb3071 8 місяців тому
I've definitely not had any intoxicating substances to enhance my viewing pleasure of this mind bending video in any way shape or form.
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 8 місяців тому
Hopefully this is a compliment 😄
@jamieb3071
@jamieb3071 8 місяців тому
@@bigscientificquestions 10/10. Loved it.
@freedahcheetah
@freedahcheetah 8 місяців тому
​@@bigscientificquestionsIt's more of a complement.
@terrymaccarrone9927
@terrymaccarrone9927 8 місяців тому
I think Tesla Time Theory has application to inter dimension vibration packets of Quantum Energy
@tomorowsnobodys
@tomorowsnobodys 8 місяців тому
Yep me too pinky promise
@geraldfrig9151
@geraldfrig9151 6 місяців тому
This video gives a description of particles that seems to be relatively coherent, logical and easy to understand. Even though I got my atomic physics education a LONG TIME AGO (60 yrs), it was recent enough for me to see how this newer & more complex system features blends and extends beyond what I remember of my past atomic theory. I think this presentation is one of the VERY BEST I've listened to. KUDOS! You've done a wonderful job to make a text that even an 85 yo brain can digest! THANK YOU SIRS!
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 6 місяців тому
I'm glad to hear that the video provided a clear and understandable explanation of particle physics, and that it effectively built upon and expanded your knowledge from your atomic physics education. It's wonderful that it resonated with you, proving to be accessible and engaging even years after your formal studies. Your appreciation for the effort put into making complex scientific concepts digestible is heartening. Thank you for your kind words! 😊
@davidwillis5016
@davidwillis5016 3 місяці тому
I agree with you and your old timey brain is on point
@Himanshugupta777
@Himanshugupta777 8 місяців тому
Fantastic explanation at a good pace. Very helpful to get clarity on so many things in one go, at atomic level
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 8 місяців тому
Thank you! Delighted it made things clear for you 😊
@mariorico440
@mariorico440 6 місяців тому
The electrons circling around the nucleos 24/7 Wow! That requires a lots of energy.
@jyinxtv7740
@jyinxtv7740 8 місяців тому
40 secs in and you have already given me existential crisis
@neildunlop3805
@neildunlop3805 8 місяців тому
Im obsessed with this subject, and this hit a perfect depth and pace. Wonderful
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 8 місяців тому
Thank you very much for your wonderful comment 😊
@edwardlee2794
@edwardlee2794 8 місяців тому
Quite a comprehensive overview from fundamental particles to the Cosmo into our very own existence and after life. More importantly, to me that is, I'm glued to the screen and surprisingly understand. Great job and keep up the good work. From Hong Kong
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 8 місяців тому
Thank you so much! It's heartening to know our content resonated with you. Your support means the world! Greetings to Hong Kong! 😊
@BobCampbell530
@BobCampbell530 8 місяців тому
@@bigscientificquestions I have listened to the first 6 minutes many times and I'm still not understanding how the question you started with "Where do electrons get the energy to spin around an atom's nucleus?". I think you say "because of the principles of quantum mechanics, the electron can never reach the nucleus, becoming perpetually stuck in orbit." But I'd like a more complete answer. You don't need to answer this. Look at my reply to this question.
@BobCampbell530
@BobCampbell530 8 місяців тому
I asked ChatGPT and here is the answer Here's how it works: Absorption: When an electron absorbs energy, it temporarily moves to a higher energy level. This energy can come from various sources, such as photons of specific frequencies (which correspond to the energy difference between the initial and final energy levels) or external electric fields. Emission: When the electron returns to a lower energy level, it emits energy in the form of a photon. This emitted photon carries away the energy difference between the two energy levels. The energy is released into the surroundings, which can include the surrounding space or other particles in the atom. So, while electrons can change energy levels and emit or absorb energy, the total energy within a closed system is conserved. Energy exchanges within a closed system, in discrete, quantized steps, and the total energy of the system remains constant according to the principle of conservation of energy. For a more detailed answer you can see the entire chat at chat.openai.com/share/d3f7a0d1-57f6-418d-bb0d-010d48e7a9b9
@F8Tributo
@F8Tributo 7 місяців тому
​@@BobCampbell530I'm only 5½ minutes into this, and it seems that the atom has been described as a perpetual motion machine! I don't think the question of where atoms get their energy was answered at all, at least not at the grassroots level. It's an "emperor's new clothes" answer, and you're just supposed to accept that it's due to the characteristics of their quantum nature. Might as well just say: "Because, that's why", or "That's just the way it is". But I will soldier on, to see if the rest of the video gets to the point, or drowns out the question in a torrent of hypothetical gobbledygook. I remain optimistic! Onwards!
@BobCampbell530
@BobCampbell530 7 місяців тому
I@@F8Tributo I can't seem to find the answer to my own question that I posted later, but the energy comes from photons OUTSIDE of the atoms. I don't think that was made very clear in the article, but I found my answer through ChatGPT.
@bigbear7567
@bigbear7567 7 місяців тому
WOW! these documentaries are the most thoroughly detailed videos ever and I have been watching these kind of documentaries for almost 40 years!
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 7 місяців тому
Thank you! It's an honor to hear that from such an experienced viewer. We appreciate your feedback! 😊
@dreamerworld1495
@dreamerworld1495 5 місяців тому
I have to listen to this several more times. I love it. You have opened a world of marvelous curious knowledge i would have never know if wasnt for this video as my world revolves around a different science. I am so thankful for this knowledge. I want more of this trivia, and explanations. LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 5 місяців тому
Thank you so much for your wonderful comment 😊
@StephiSensei26
@StephiSensei26 8 місяців тому
Thank you, I really think I learned something, ...I think. Highly interesting and informative. Now, I'll just have to give myself time to ponder these thoughts and give my molecules time to calm down and return to vibrating harmonically again, as they are in a very excited state right now. Great stuff!
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 8 місяців тому
Thank you so much for your thoughtful comment! It's wonderful to hear that you found the information exciting and thought-provoking. It's like our minds are a symphony of ideas, and sometimes they need a moment to find their harmonious rhythm once again. 😊
@StephiSensei26
@StephiSensei26 8 місяців тому
"...a symphony of ideas...", I like the image. Thanks again. I look forward to more of the same in the future. Basically, we are all children staring up at the night sky.@@bigscientificquestions
@RichardAlsenz
@RichardAlsenz 7 місяців тому
ukposts.info/the/DmikjslWwIlxJDpiimuQ3w.html This is false information! No uman as ever seen a point in space. Some irratnal humas claimed to see a point wen they see a picture of a point.
@triple_gem_shining
@triple_gem_shining 7 місяців тому
😅
@bassoprof
@bassoprof 8 місяців тому
This is a fantastic video that makes everything crystal clear to any atomic scientist.
@whiteknight7wayne493
@whiteknight7wayne493 8 місяців тому
or past wannabe. lol
@jorgenoriega9152
@jorgenoriega9152 8 місяців тому
Is a foton eternal?? Could you please answer that question...thank s
@ShortFuseFighting
@ShortFuseFighting 6 місяців тому
The amount of ads in this video is borderline criminal. People are trying to watch this while falling asleep only to have their ears wrecked every 3 minutes. Fk this
@nikhilgujar
@nikhilgujar 3 місяці тому
After watching this fantastic video end to end, I am a bit more knowledgeable, though I admit, I have to watch this for atleast a few more times to get more understanding. As I watched this hour long video, few doubts arose but since I failed to pause and jot down these, I will pen down my doubts after I watch a second or third time. Brilliant work, soothing voice and simple explanation to a complexity which mankind has yet to grasp.
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 2 місяці тому
Thank you so much for your wonderful comment 😊
@shiva.chennai
@shiva.chennai 8 місяців тому
I am a Mechanical engineer. This video is really interesting. Can we compare human body with universe? Can we see the bigbang with our biological body? Moreover Are we the only intelligent being in the universe? 13:15
@alphaone2834
@alphaone2834 8 місяців тому
I don't know
@simjam1980
@simjam1980 8 місяців тому
The macro mirrors the micro. All of life has intelligence. It's just different levels. Humans are just a bunch of atoms after all. Does every cell in your body have intelligence, or just some?
@kumidodasilva6241
@kumidodasilva6241 8 місяців тому
it depends on how you define intelligence.. and being.. and universe..
@kumidodasilva6241
@kumidodasilva6241 8 місяців тому
@@shiva.chennai maybe we can.. but first you have to define what you want to measure.. and that would only be a scale of intelligence based on the definition you have chosen..
@jasonveritas9441
@jasonveritas9441 8 місяців тому
Imho, to answer that requires knowing who/what we really are and where we actually are…..🤔🎼🤙
@Daveyboy4
@Daveyboy4 8 місяців тому
It really gets you thinking about the beginning of the universe. We started as a ball or raw energy, due to fluctuations its started to combine it kept getting more and more complex and dense until stars were born. When stars die, heavy elements are made, making planets and eventually us. It cant be just a bunch of random events?
@richardwebb9532
@richardwebb9532 7 місяців тому
Yet, the universe did not collapse in on itself. You're breaking the "rules" if you think the mass of the universe would not collapse in on itself, even 1 million years after the big bang. ....and define the word "theory" for us???
@joeturner9219
@joeturner9219 7 місяців тому
"In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth." -Genesis 1:1
@richardwebb9532
@richardwebb9532 7 місяців тому
@@joeturner9219 ...and God said: let there be light.... And the double slit experiment came into existence....🍻👍
@ShortFuseFighting
@ShortFuseFighting 6 місяців тому
​@@joeturner9219adorable how you use the words in the bible to PROVE the bible. Here, lemme try. "i am the most handsome man on earth" me 1:1 Wow, who knew life could be so convenient
@DistinctiveBlend
@DistinctiveBlend 4 місяці тому
When you heat water it boils... do you also call that 'a bunch of random events'? Or put another way causality isn't random.
@aldunlop4622
@aldunlop4622 5 місяців тому
Every time I watch videos about physics I’m reminded why I love Chemistry so much. Physics is like space magic. It’s a miracle the universe exists.
@ChanIzKineske
@ChanIzKineske 7 місяців тому
I admire your intelligence, it is easy to learn(understand) difficult principes, thanx to your gift to make such a great video! Thank you forever. Rare quality standard you just demonstrated here, I hope you continue on, doing even better (if it is even possible:))!
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 7 місяців тому
Thank you so much for your fascinating comment. 😊
@wallyreyes8876
@wallyreyes8876 7 місяців тому
Same here.
@jimkirby1799
@jimkirby1799 8 місяців тому
The strong force adds about 1000 times the mass of the three quarks making up the protons and neutrons. This is probably due to the high energy density of the gluons being exchanged by the quarks.
@yanair2091
@yanair2091 8 місяців тому
It's just difficult to explain. That's also how I understand it, but then it'd mean gluons have mass or otherwise if they are massless they vibrate (move) with a speed of light?
@oskarskalski2982
@oskarskalski2982 8 місяців тому
​@@yanair2091according to the standard model they do move with the speed of light all massless particles have to move with the speed of light. 99% of the mass of the proton (and neutron) comes from kinetic energy of particles inside them. Inside of the nucleon is a big bubbly soup of gluons constantly exchanging color charge and particles popping up into existence and then annihilating.
@jg1772
@jg1772 7 місяців тому
Oh bravo. We’re all so proud of you.
@aurora123borealis
@aurora123borealis 8 місяців тому
The best video I've ever seen on these subjects. Fantastic.
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 8 місяців тому
Glad you enjoyed it, thank you very much for your great comment 😊
@justanotherguy469
@justanotherguy469 8 місяців тому
@@bigscientificquestions Is that your voice. I love the cadence.
@sspremo
@sspremo 7 місяців тому
Excellent video, in one hour you described most of physics, most comprehensive video I saw until now…. I think that from any sentence in this video someone can make a one hour video… 😊 really good explanation without so many sentences, brief and brilliant.
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 7 місяців тому
Thank you so much for your great comment 😊
@savage22bolt32
@savage22bolt32 7 місяців тому
@@bigscientificquestions Constructive criticism: lose the background noise! The subject & your narration of it is great. The addition of distracting & annoying music ruined the vid for me, I didn't get past a couple of minutes.
@jonhart-dj7fn
@jonhart-dj7fn 6 місяців тому
i l8 narrative' Ill be with you till the end of time'
@davidwillis5016
@davidwillis5016 3 місяці тому
Good video very comprehensive and I backed it up in several spots to listen to the concepts over a couple of times and will save the video and watch it again it is very informative and you have done a very good job in the format that you presented the subject, three cheers to you and anyone else that participated in the creation of this documentary
@RichardRobinson
@RichardRobinson 8 місяців тому
Please do more long format videos!
@suecondon1685
@suecondon1685 8 місяців тому
This is fascinating and full of intriguing questions. I enjoyed that, my atoms are well and truly jiggled now 😊
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 8 місяців тому
Glad you enjoyed it, thanks a lot for your great comment 😊
@AkbarAli-lc7vy
@AkbarAli-lc7vy 8 місяців тому
Keep working you will be the next Big youtuber.🎉 Good luck 🤞🤞😊👍
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 8 місяців тому
Thank you very much for your wonderful comment and good wishes 🙏😊
@elpidiusmwape7170
@elpidiusmwape7170 8 місяців тому
One of the best convincing video describing the behaviour of nature. Pliz bring more of these.
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 8 місяців тому
Thank you so much 😊
@antoniosmpl.3457
@antoniosmpl.3457 8 місяців тому
very interesting , i could though point to the Bose Einstein temperature about the atom properties on absolute zero ,also it is fascinating how nature made the neutron ,if you leave it alone or it doesnt fit it decays ,but if you put it in a symmetrical or balanced atom or a neutron star it doesnt break and usually we get lots of energy when things shrink or break
@CrakenFlux
@CrakenFlux 8 місяців тому
BREAK. BRAKE IS STOPPING A CAR. SHOULD BE EMBARRASSING FOR YOU.
@ossyx
@ossyx 8 місяців тому
​@@CrakenFlux Break.* Usually sentences don't have all letters capital. Embarrasing.
@antoniosmpl.3457
@antoniosmpl.3457 8 місяців тому
@@CrakenFlux thanks for the note ,i ll correct it , ok break like in 2 pieces or more right but as a matter of fact if 2 pieces or more will brake on each other they will still release energy and possibly break :p was a bit funny though
@MARILYNANDERSON88
@MARILYNANDERSON88 8 місяців тому
​@@CrakenFluxnobody is embarrassed about spell correct. You feel shame over spelling correct😂
@robertolimpio9164
@robertolimpio9164 8 місяців тому
I really like and appreciate this video... Suggestion though.... You put all this time into the information and graphics, and set behind it an infinitely looping and invasive background melody which is extremely distracting, and just for me, became highly annoying. Im sorry for being nefative, and i do appreciate all the work this video must have taken.
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 8 місяців тому
Noted! Thank you so much for your feedback 😊
@rggndfw
@rggndfw 8 місяців тому
Same here. Music way too loud. It's called background for a reason. Love the info and video knowlegde though.@@bigscientificquestions
@teejatron9849
@teejatron9849 7 місяців тому
Yes, this. But also: 1. Ammonia is not a greenhouse gas 2. "Comprises," or "is composed of," not "is comprised of"
@haraldriegler6000
@haraldriegler6000 6 місяців тому
I also agree. It's a great video that I highly appreciate, but after 1 hour of the same music loop that plays just two chords, I can't hear it anymore... 😅 I'd actually love to re-hear this video a couple of times due to the complex content, but that will be a test of my resolve 😊 due to the music.
@audantic2787
@audantic2787 6 місяців тому
I like the background but agree it’s a bit loud. also understand annoying loop but for myself, it’s less of a distraction b/c of the redundancy. I saved to my work background tracks. The illustrations are absolutely amazing and inspiring, I didn’t see a credit to the artists but would love to know who did them and how they were made
@khosta6690
@khosta6690 8 місяців тому
Best one for me is why things are solid when atoms are mostly empty. I never thought to ask this and the answer was brilliant
@ShaneOsborne
@ShaneOsborne 8 місяців тому
10 ^5
@WalterWE
@WalterWE 8 місяців тому
Brilliant video. Still, one thing I didn’t understand in part I: at 4:40 onwards you say “The total energy of an electron in orbit [=kinetic+potential] is +negative+”, while simultaneously explaining that the attracting force of the positive nucleus must be exactly matched by an opposite force driving the electron onwards in order for the atom as a whole to remain stable. But it seems to me the latter would imply the total energy mentioned earlier should be +zero+ (in order to keep the whole atom stable). If it is negative instead, wouldn’t that mean the electon would require a constant stream of additional energy to keep orbiting? Or put more generally: how can matter (even as tiny as an electron) have permanent negative energy? I’m assuming I’m either completely misunderstanding or missing something, but can someone please point out to me the error in my thinking?
@amitshukla6555
@amitshukla6555 8 місяців тому
Actually the electrostatic potential energy of a stationary electron at the infinite distance from the nucleus is taken as zero and as the electron approaches towards the nucleus, the electrostatic attraction is in the same direction as the motion, which means the potential energy of the electron starts to decrease so lesser than zero that make it negative. Now, if the electron just “fell” straight in toward the nucleus, it would gain kinetic energy and the total energy (potential plus kinetic) would stay zero. But some of that kinetic energy gets lost to photons emitted by the atom as the electron drops into lower and lower orbitals and its total energy becomes negative. The electron also has kinetic energy. Kinetic energy can never be negative (because in K.E expression we have squared of velocity which is always positive) and it is smaller in magnitude than the potential energy. Source: Byju
@alaknandabhatt3330
@alaknandabhatt3330 8 місяців тому
See force and energy is a different thing What the above reply is is absolutely correct and needs no more explanation
@3.1429
@3.1429 8 місяців тому
​@@amitshukla6555rightly referred
@lando9238
@lando9238 7 місяців тому
Electrons don’t orbit either
@markb3786
@markb3786 8 місяців тому
I watch a lot of QM videos. You should have a million subs.
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 8 місяців тому
Thank you so much for your good wishes 😊
@carlopolli3995
@carlopolli3995 7 місяців тому
The universe being similar to an atoms size is something I always wondered. Or do sub atomic particles have near infinite amounts of space and time inside or near them? We know time and space can bend and stretch but no one knows to what limits, if there are any limits.
@KartizaK
@KartizaK 7 місяців тому
There is no such thing as Time.......There is only the Now
@carlopolli3995
@carlopolli3995 7 місяців тому
@@KartizaK Except when I read your comment you had written it 3 hours ago!
@KartizaK
@KartizaK 7 місяців тому
lol 3 hours on planet earth. but from the moon it was 6 hours ago ;-)@@carlopolli3995
@daytradersanonymous9955
@daytradersanonymous9955 7 місяців тому
​@KartizaK Your a clown right now😂
@RichardAlsenz
@RichardAlsenz 7 місяців тому
That is redculous. ukposts.info/the/DmikjslWwIlxJDpiimuQ3w.html
@winstonsmith8240
@winstonsmith8240 4 місяці тому
Not the easiest, but certainly one of the most rewarding videos I've seen. The fact that people have worked this out is quite remarkable. However I think the most fundamental questions will never be answered. T=1 will forever elude us.
@Tampabman
@Tampabman 4 місяці тому
I dream one day it will be known. It’s possible…
@winstonsmith8240
@winstonsmith8240 4 місяці тому
@@Tampabman It's fun looking anyway.
@lengould9262
@lengould9262 7 місяців тому
For me, the biggest question no-one is discussing is "Exactly what is electric charge? and how does an electron get exactly -1 and the u type quarks get +2/3 charge and d type get -1/3 charge? And the anti electron gets +1 charge and the anti-quarks get -2/3 or +1/3." So what IS electric charge? What single or multiple of "things" confer electric charge on things? Is it the same "thing" for electrons and quarks? I think i understand magnetism IF electric charge is given.
@alanbatty4391
@alanbatty4391 8 місяців тому
This is a fantastic video! I am very impressed at the units our reality breaks down/begins (10-43 seconds: 10-33 CM) is referenced and opens the doors to current fields discussions of the nature of realty itself for example by Donald Hoffman. Super thorough and should be a standard viewing for Chemistry/Physics students!
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 8 місяців тому
Glad you enjoyed it! Thank you very much for your great comment. 😊
@NarenLumpkin
@NarenLumpkin 8 місяців тому
Thank you for a directly pertinent referral.❤❤❤
@jlo13800
@jlo13800 8 місяців тому
The aether ZPE sustains and makes up the electron. We all been dumbed down with all this quantum quackery bullshit and I go with Nikola Tesla on the aether.
@whiteknight7wayne493
@whiteknight7wayne493 8 місяців тому
No wonder, I thought , the answer to ' Life the Universe and Everything is 42 " as 43 just doesnt work in the Hollywood [Galaxy].......
@nwchrista
@nwchrista 8 місяців тому
Nope... It's all dogma, not empirically derived science. All of these physics departments should be dismantled and thrown away along with most of the garbage they push on to unsuspecting students. Newton's laws may remain for the moment, but these are also questionable, with the evident perpetual motion machine known as the Atom, and the subatomic particles that this ridiculously contrived, yet beautifully produced pile of rubbish attempted and failed at delivering. Electrons do not decay. Protons do not decay. Neutrons do not decay. Atoms do not decay. Entropy fails at this subatomic scale. And if it fails there, why does it not fail everywhere? This video was disinformational. It's time to move on folks... This is old, contrived nonsense based on failed science that was either intentionally or unintentionally delivered to the masses to prevent us from arriving at the real nature of the universe.
@simoneerceg7116
@simoneerceg7116 8 місяців тому
Brilliant!! The most engaging hour I have ever spent watching YT. Deep gratitude for your dedication ❤ aroha nui from New Zealand (sub'd)
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 8 місяців тому
Thank you very much, aroha nui to New Zealand ❤️ 😊
@ILostMyWay
@ILostMyWay 7 місяців тому
Why did I have to go through 12 years of schooling when your 1 hour long video would have been sufficient? 😮
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 2 місяці тому
❤😊
@tucsonguy62
@tucsonguy62 7 місяців тому
Nice video. There are other theories about electron spin. One is the electron is actually two negative charges spinning about each other. The charge wants to push the charges away from each other. But the magnetic field generated by the motion wants to draw them closer together. The balance point defines the size of the electron. This theory comes from R. Distinti. He can be found on youtube. He has a very compelling theory of everything. Which of course includes gravity.
@BobCampbell530
@BobCampbell530 7 місяців тому
I watched the introduction to Distinti's UKposts channel and he sounds very confident and passionate, but I'm bewildered. To start with, maybe you could tell me, what is a 'PRETON'?
@tucsonguy62
@tucsonguy62 7 місяців тому
I would be happy to. He has a very well developed theory of the ether. He has a model of the ether which is the base for all forces in the universe. The preton is part of the ether theory. It takes time but it is well worth the effort to watch the series of videos which describe his theory. Start with this one, ukposts.info/have/v-deo/saWGiHd5g7Bit58.html Then watch the next by searching for emv001. There are about 130 videos. I looked for decades for a good theory on everything. His was the only one which made sense. Many of his ideas actually match the founders of electricity. But he filled in the holes. I do hope you take the time. Just ignore his feelings on orthodox science. Once that is done then his theory of gravity or theory of everything makes sense. You can start with EM03 01 Good luck.
@BobCampbell530
@BobCampbell530 7 місяців тому
THANK YOU! Robert Distini is a genius and I appreciate that you lead me to him. Over the past three days I've watched nearly every one of his videos.
@bgmckeown
@bgmckeown 6 місяців тому
Great video though I still struggle with the Big Bang since no one can explain where all the particles came from...hopefully one day we'll work it out
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 6 місяців тому
Thank you 😊
@davidmcc8727
@davidmcc8727 5 місяців тому
Read about inflation theory and big bang.
@robertoscichilone4087
@robertoscichilone4087 8 місяців тому
Wonderful!
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 8 місяців тому
Many thanks! 😊
@robertoscichilone4087
@robertoscichilone4087 8 місяців тому
@@bigscientificquestions Please!😉
@outworld15
@outworld15 5 місяців тому
İ loved the music, the dynamic illustrations and the explanations. Definitely looking forward to more videos!
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 2 місяці тому
Thank you so much 😊
@donniehall9088
@donniehall9088 7 місяців тому
This music helps me to imagine your words' 👏 amazing information. Especially when you compare it with physical events, people, and unity. Thanks again for this awesome video and great feeling music. ❤
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 7 місяців тому
Thank you so much for your great comment 😊
@swarnamohanty3121
@swarnamohanty3121 7 місяців тому
Excellent video, but for PhD students, I can't understand or may be I don't have sufficient patience !
@RicardoMarlowFlamenco
@RicardoMarlowFlamenco 8 місяців тому
At 9:04, I always felt as a layperson that this “mystery” makes inflation problematic. But recently I found Alan Guth explaining it matter of factly, not as a “mystery” at all. The “energy” that drove this is initiated as a typical fluctuation in the vacuum, due to NEGATIVE PRESSURE DENSITY. This situation is implied to be happening constantly and randomly….meaning outside of our bubble it is happening all over the place (a version of multiverse better thought of multi bubble of the cosmos in general). The bubble doubles in size about 100 times before an inevitable phase transition occurs that stops the “inflationary period of time” (and thus any further inflation events in our own bubble). The phase transition is important to understand because it book ends the concept of start and stop, and can eventually be observed (in theory). So if you buy the inflation concept at all, NO it is not a mysterious force that drove the expansion then stopped. It is negative pressure density due to quantum chaos of the vacuum and its virtual particle situation (which is real and verified in experiments).
@Jarjarjar21
@Jarjarjar21 8 місяців тому
And how DO they get the caramel into a Cadbury chocolate bar?!?!
@OwenHooper-mv4fm
@OwenHooper-mv4fm 8 місяців тому
I think that without an infinite vacuum, electrons would NEED energy. They are basically nothing but chaos potentiality. They need a canvas that has actual zero friction.
@mkenton3
@mkenton3 8 місяців тому
This was excellent and really did answer a number of questions for me. On request on formatting, drop the repeating tune. It’s distracting and your voice can carry this just fine.
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 8 місяців тому
Thank you so much for your feedback😊
@camilleespinas2898
@camilleespinas2898 8 місяців тому
Love the illustrations. They are incredible.
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 8 місяців тому
Thank you so much 😊
@ryanowens8151
@ryanowens8151 6 місяців тому
A good video. The standard model tells us what nature does but not why. I hope that as particle accelerators advance, we'll get a better handle on what the fabric of space is made of.
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 5 місяців тому
Thank you 😊
@xAllCatsAreBeautiful1312x
@xAllCatsAreBeautiful1312x 4 місяці тому
We already know what the fabric of space is made of. Everything in the universe is compromised of energy vibrating or oscillating at different frequencies.
@ryanowens8151
@ryanowens8151 4 місяці тому
@@xAllCatsAreBeautiful1312x I believe the fabric of space is a field of energy as well. Perhaps one day we'll be able to observe it's composure. I believe that will be what makes us capable of true space travel.
@msagarwal
@msagarwal 7 місяців тому
thank you for your efforts which bring some perception to abstract concepts
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 7 місяців тому
You’re welcome 😊
@justanotherguy469
@justanotherguy469 8 місяців тому
I love your cadence. The visuals were superb. I only wished that you had touched upon the Planck length.
@alcodelange1975
@alcodelange1975 8 місяців тому
God bless for the great video's 🙏❤️
@patrickb2701
@patrickb2701 8 місяців тому
One of the best videos of this kind ive seen
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 8 місяців тому
Many thanks for your great comment 😊
@korundum4992
@korundum4992 8 місяців тому
... of this kind ... ? ... or ... of the 3rd kind ... ?
@patrickb2701
@patrickb2701 8 місяців тому
@@korundum4992 of this kind....close though
@reynalindstrom2496
@reynalindstrom2496 6 місяців тому
Thank you! Great video, a powerful description of the Atomic world. Love from Sweden
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 5 місяців тому
You are welcome, love to Sweden 🇸🇪 😊
@0ned
@0ned 7 місяців тому
No, its the ether slowing down, like why a disc spins fastest at the edge but a vortex spins fastest closer to center. Relativity is Galilean, Classical Invariance. The ether wind is faster at higher altitudes, and regular with time of day and year, like a gentle breeze on a high speed sailboat keeping time with the wind. See Wilhelm Reich on cosmic superimposition and James DeMeo on neg-entropy.
@frankz4900
@frankz4900 8 місяців тому
Excellent video
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 8 місяців тому
Glad you liked it 😊
@kwatt-engineer796
@kwatt-engineer796 8 місяців тому
This video is incredible! I'm loving every second. I do have a question. If information transfer within the universe is limited to the speed of light, where does quantum entanglement fit within this limit? As I understand it does transmit information at speeds not limited by the speed of light. I will be looking forward to a reply from someone far better informed on this than me.
@klarname4063
@klarname4063 8 місяців тому
Quantum entanglement does not transmit information. That is a very common misconception.
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 8 місяців тому
Thank you so much 😊 This question was also the reason for Einstein's objection to quantum entanglement, you can watch this video about how Einstein was proved wrong: ukposts.info/have/v-deo/spOIk6NqbZiHt4U.html
@ConsciousConversations
@ConsciousConversations 8 місяців тому
Oh Albert. He even answers questions not yet asked…
@stevefarris7149
@stevefarris7149 8 місяців тому
The music in the background is working my last gluon.
@MasterBlaster3545
@MasterBlaster3545 8 місяців тому
Theories oh theories
@edenchoe2990
@edenchoe2990 7 місяців тому
Thanks for such great video. It is easy to understand with very rich infomation.
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 7 місяців тому
You’re welcome, I’m so glad you like it😊
@PedroRafael
@PedroRafael 8 місяців тому
Very interesting and clarifying video! Thank you
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 8 місяців тому
Thanks! Glad you enjoyed it 😊
@volkerkorb538
@volkerkorb538 8 місяців тому
Great video! It has answered quite a view questions i have ever had. Thanks!
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 8 місяців тому
Glad it was helpful, many thanks for your great comment 😊
@simonmasters3295
@simonmasters3295 8 місяців тому
@@bigscientificquestions 9 out of 10 of your animations show wholly inappropriate (macro scale) interactions that do not properly illustrate the counter-intuitive quantum realm. I cannot agree with other comments by your fan-base that say this is the best animation possible. Good effort but you perpetuate the ideas that we can intuit this stuff whereas it is actually not at all like the world we are familiar with.
@thepuma2012
@thepuma2012 6 місяців тому
@@simonmasters3295 i agree. most of the time only what is said is valid, not the video with it.
@skyshark445
@skyshark445 8 місяців тому
Fantastic video. With all we know. There is much we do not.
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 8 місяців тому
Thank you so much 😊
@Ringolero
@Ringolero 2 місяці тому
Excellent video. Also I love the Bismuth 209, near immortality, nugget at the end, giving me something else to look up immediately after.
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 2 місяці тому
Thank you so much 😊
@Samsara_is_dukkha
@Samsara_is_dukkha 5 місяців тому
One hour of topics that are totally unrelated to the conscious experience... which is all we have.
@v.prestorpnrcrtlcrt2096
@v.prestorpnrcrtlcrt2096 8 місяців тому
Fantastic journey with the ancestors. I can see an amazing Yoga Intention with this in mind. 🙏🏼
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 8 місяців тому
Absolutely!! 😊
@jg1772
@jg1772 7 місяців тому
Gay gay gay.
@gregb5251
@gregb5251 5 місяців тому
This video was amazing!!! I thoroughly enjoyed it, yeah okay the music was a little bit much now and again but its plain to see a lot of work went into it........
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 5 місяців тому
Thank you so much for this great comment 😊
@michaelanthonysr.
@michaelanthonysr. 4 місяці тому
Absolutely Fascinating, especially the final portion of this presentation.!
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 2 місяці тому
Thank you so much 😊
@dr.satishsharma1362
@dr.satishsharma1362 8 місяців тому
Excellent.... thanks 🙏.
@mariyammapapabathiniratnam7862
@mariyammapapabathiniratnam7862 8 місяців тому
Sorry to say that when the woman giving birth after birth the new born baby cannot go back in to the womb again this is called the power of God like that about the numbers in neumaralagi 1= A ,2=B ,3=C, 4,=D, 5=E up to 26,=Z and here 26 is not called BF as this to say that about 10 means 25s as 55 and 12 is 26 as 66 like that 2+5=7 and 2+6=8 .In this after 25 the next number is 26 but when we take these numbers as 10 and 12 and where is the number 11 so the secret is 10= 1 as 1+0=1 , 1+1=2, 1+2=3 called 1,2,3 or A B C . And about 10 and 12 called 10 J and 12 L .JL means water in Indian language JAL and if we take 11 that 10 11 12 J AA L means NET in the Indian language and 5+5 is EE and 12 is L here EEL means fish here to tell where is water there will be fish ,net ,ship and in the ship Novah built 3 storee to know these things see the image of the universe in this by measuring and watching we get all the answers And the power of God as in the Bible Daniel 7 chap time times and half time and Solomon built the steps 5, 6 7 and about many secrets we are seeing but not abcerving and this 2025 2926 as 2+5=7 and 2+6=8 here the 7 is Jesus place and 8 is Jehovah place and there is no time the given. time is over and also about 5 cartons and 6 cartons both length 30 width 4 and make 5 and 6 cartons together or stich then it will be 11 cartons as 11x4= 44 and 30 x 11=330 these are the steps to go to 7th place as 2023 and 2024 as 2+3 =5 and 2+4=6 so wait and watch and 23 24 is Mene mene and 10 11 12 is T K L and this is the Judgement days and see the pictures Thankyou.. photos.app.goo.gl/X1EyHhhsmcbzVGbu9
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 8 місяців тому
Thank you for your encouraging feedback. 😊
@everythingtorah
@everythingtorah 8 місяців тому
Nice video detailing just how complicated the building blocks of our universe is. Considering the complexity of it all in itself proves such an orderly system couldn't have been created by accident and indeed Intelligent Design/G-d exists.
@skyshark445
@skyshark445 8 місяців тому
Absolutely!!!!
@subjekt5577
@subjekt5577 8 місяців тому
Who says anything about creation being an intentional act?
@josephfernandez8197
@josephfernandez8197 7 місяців тому
Very true, Isaiah 40:26 describes the energy source that produced our universe, "Lift up your eyes to heaven and see. Who has created these things? It is the One who brings out their army by number; He calls them all by name. Because of his vast dynamic energy and his awe-inspiring power, Not one of them is missing."
@t.w.wright2520
@t.w.wright2520 6 місяців тому
⁠@@subjekt5577whoever said it wasn’t an intentional act?
@DistinctiveBlend
@DistinctiveBlend 4 місяці тому
@@t.w.wright2520 Anyone who understands that presupposing answers isn't how science is done
@eric-janhted9346
@eric-janhted9346 8 місяців тому
To conclude the circle of life, it ends with "are atoms stable". For most atoms a sensible path of decay can be described. But to my understanding there's also a path of growth by catching subatomic particles and incorporating them in the nucleus. Isn't this evolving in an equilibrium.
@thepuma2012
@thepuma2012 6 місяців тому
i never heard of atoms growing like you describe. It s also against the rule that they seek their lowest energy state.
@eric-janhted9346
@eric-janhted9346 6 місяців тому
It's how many radioactive materials are made for instance to be used in medical applications. And in fusion.@@thepuma2012
@ResoRonnie
@ResoRonnie 4 місяці тому
Well I think the video is perfect. Especially the background audio adding an immersion sensation.
@playpaltalk
@playpaltalk 8 місяців тому
I love it great documentary🤔
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 8 місяців тому
Thank you very much 😊
@TheDavidlloydjones
@TheDavidlloydjones 8 місяців тому
And what about the most important question, Why did the atom cross the road?
@whizzer2944
@whizzer2944 8 місяців тому
To get to the other side , your turn.
@RipRoarin
@RipRoarin 8 місяців тому
Because a road was in its path?
@Y1O9S4E0F
@Y1O9S4E0F 8 місяців тому
​@@whizzer2944🎉😂😂 0,😢
@tomellis487
@tomellis487 8 місяців тому
It was already there and everywhere until the motorist observed it.
@whizzer2944
@whizzer2944 8 місяців тому
@@jjdean787 I vote your quip the best , very dry.
@hometown555
@hometown555 8 місяців тому
Wow UKposts's algorithm is on point after watching a hour long video on quantum mechanics every question I still had was asked at the beginning of this video. Lol
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 7 місяців тому
😎
@noneofyourbizness
@noneofyourbizness 8 місяців тому
with content as high quality as this vid i was shocked to see that the channel has just 7.7K subs. guessing the channel must have launched very recently. if not, the utube algorithm needs redesigning.
@nickwillder
@nickwillder 6 місяців тому
Tremendous piece of work. I would prefer the cadences of a real spoken voice to create interest (and to better pronounce a few words like 'integer' and 'hadron').
@lorddissy
@lorddissy 4 місяці тому
I thought I was the only one. "kilometers slash esss" really does break the sentence.
@Gaminiheraliyawala
@Gaminiheraliyawala 7 місяців тому
Amazingly this confirms Buddhism is a great philosophy and agrees 100% with Abhidhamma, which is the science and logics of Buddhism. Thank you very much for this great insight 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏and for me having studied Abhidhamma made me to comprehend and bridge knowledge between modern science and Buddhism.
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 7 місяців тому
You’re welcome ☺️
@gdurant
@gdurant 5 місяців тому
Here's one stunning comment for everyone to look at, learn from and hear: Atoms can't evolve! Isaac Newton full well knew the gravity of the statement and that is exactly why he was a devout Christian man as was Michael Faraday, Leo Tolstoy, Joseph Priestley and all the great minds of past and present knew that there had to be an all-powerful God in order to set things in place. In more recent times even Albert Einstein acknowledged the existence of the Almighty. That God's name is Yahweh God the Father Almighty with his son Jesus Christ at his side.
@DistinctiveBlend
@DistinctiveBlend 4 місяці тому
@@gdurant can you command mountains to move?
@michaelrose93
@michaelrose93 8 місяців тому
Is it possible to separate atoms that have nuclei of different rotational velocities?
@beingsentient
@beingsentient 8 місяців тому
Good question. I was wondering the same. In fact, I've never read about any method that could measure the rotational velocity of an atom, though there are rotational modes of excitation in unsymmetric molecules.
@atanacioluna292
@atanacioluna292 4 місяці тому
Fantastic; The fantasy of existence condensed into a few moments of humanity's deepest thoughts streaming into beauty and fun. Thanks, i feel whole.
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 2 місяці тому
Thank so much for your wonderful comment 😊
@hellovicki6779
@hellovicki6779 8 місяців тому
Your description of electrons dancing according to the amount of light energy they receive seems analogous to light energy being a source of nutrition for hungry electrons that consume the light. Reality is too strange to conceive and we know too little to form a coherent picture, that is my experience. Without light, could electrons still dance?
@NarenLumpkin
@NarenLumpkin 8 місяців тому
What you are made of is not atoms, mercy be with you do not fashion you can know through the mind.
@ahnov6670
@ahnov6670 8 місяців тому
mf answering my 3am thought
@rameshverma236
@rameshverma236 14 днів тому
From singularity to big bang and formation of atom to infinite elegant universe, we see it today is awe-inspiring and well explained.I will rewind it several times until fully understood or part of it.
@rudester7557
@rudester7557 8 місяців тому
No electrons were harmed in the creation of this video, however, they were greatly inconvenienced.
@NarenLumpkin
@NarenLumpkin 8 місяців тому
Perhaps the problem is in we’re examining a reaction like it is a state, the observation process must be begun with/within the observer. The observer directly affects the observed.❤❤❤
@CMVMic
@CMVMic 8 місяців тому
Because there is a connection between the observation and that which is being observed
@PandaCheeks
@PandaCheeks 8 місяців тому
​@@CMVMicthat has not been proven yet
@CMVMic
@CMVMic 8 місяців тому
@@PandaCheeks ofcourse it has. Light from objects are intercepted by your eye
@richardchapman9
@richardchapman9 8 місяців тому
Love this one . Vibes
@johnelwoodclarke5366
@johnelwoodclarke5366 8 місяців тому
Very entertaining!!! Worth watching. 🙂🙂🙂👍👍👍
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 8 місяців тому
Thank you so much 😊
@leonstevens1382
@leonstevens1382 8 місяців тому
Brilliant! I wish I had viewed this in high school.
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 8 місяців тому
Thank you very much 😊
@TekCroach
@TekCroach 8 місяців тому
Only the audio is important here; visual content is just decorative. 😢
@dianagale581
@dianagale581 5 місяців тому
It’s a good light show!
@TheKetsa
@TheKetsa 5 місяців тому
And that music... So annoying
@NarenLumpkin
@NarenLumpkin 8 місяців тому
True life begins with loving awareness.❤❤❤
@sunny_senpai
@sunny_senpai 8 місяців тому
Very informative. Only suggestion is to put in various music
@smoothoperator6818
@smoothoperator6818 8 місяців тому
Fantastic video!! But no mention of e=mc2; how the fundamental particles are born from pure energy
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 8 місяців тому
Thank you so much 😊
@smoothoperator6818
@smoothoperator6818 8 місяців тому
@@bigscientificquestions 🤨
@gdurant
@gdurant 5 місяців тому
Here's one stunning comment for everyone to look at, learn from and hear: Atoms can't evolve! Isaac Newton full well knew the gravity of the statement and that is exactly why he was a devout Christian man as was Michael Faraday, Leo Tolstoy, Joseph Priestley and all the great minds of past and present knew that there had to be an all-powerful God in order to set things in place. In more recent times even Albert Einstein acknowledged the existence of the Almighty. That God's name is Yahweh God the Father Almighty with his son Jesus Christ at his side.
@nk9458
@nk9458 8 місяців тому
Thanks for the video. Background music could be skipped in future. We are here for the knowledge, video and entertainment. Music was noise
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 8 місяців тому
Noted! Thanks for your feedback 😊
@quingquong
@quingquong 8 місяців тому
I liked the background music
@suecondon1685
@suecondon1685 8 місяців тому
​@@quingquongI liked it too
@jg1772
@jg1772 7 місяців тому
Fuck that invasive background music. Just make it lower in the mix. Distracting
@zerovalue5106
@zerovalue5106 7 місяців тому
I liked the music. A tad lower would have been good. But overall added to the ambiance.
@stevenwhite8937
@stevenwhite8937 8 місяців тому
The problem is you keep thinking of planetary, orbits as ellipses Or circles, instead of the spirals that they actually are.
@JimKrause1975
@JimKrause1975 7 місяців тому
I absolutely love this video!
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 5 місяців тому
Thank you so much 😊
@JimKrause1975
@JimKrause1975 5 місяців тому
My pleasure! You are my favorite channel!
@freerun_dragon
@freerun_dragon 7 місяців тому
Man being able to enjoy the atoms in this cookie dough sure is incredible
@StephenPalmer-nl4kr
@StephenPalmer-nl4kr 8 місяців тому
A fast talker and the music Makes it very difficult to listen
@jamescarter7882
@jamescarter7882 5 місяців тому
GOD is amazing. The Great Bang was a result of God's spoken word... And God said, let there be.........
@gdurant
@gdurant 5 місяців тому
Here's one stunning comment for everyone to look at, learn from and hear: Atoms can't evolve! Isaac Newton full well knew the gravity of the statement and that is exactly why he was a devout Christian man as was Michael Faraday, Leo Tolstoy, Joseph Priestley and all the great minds of past and present knew that there had to be an all-powerful God in order to set things in place. In more recent times even Albert Einstein acknowledged the existence of the Almighty. That God's name is Yahweh God the Father Almighty with his son Jesus Christ at his side.
@hythu6816
@hythu6816 5 місяців тому
Amen, 🙏
@ztwntyn8
@ztwntyn8 5 місяців тому
Light... and he saw that it was good.
@labaker3477
@labaker3477 5 місяців тому
"God said" is an expression just to relate to the human we are. That Almighty never spoke to anyone and does not have the characteristics the bible attributes to IT! IT is not a HE and certainly has no name. Yahweh is just a megalomaniac, a powerful being who used humanity ignorance of things to establish himself as a ruler. Period
@Hiphiphooray490
@Hiphiphooray490 5 місяців тому
God is an intellectually ridiculous myth.
@VGAstudent
@VGAstudent 6 місяців тому
I would have appreciated this video better if the P and S orbitals hadn't shown the classic atom pattern shown as a cosmetic branding logo instead of the actual bowling pin shaped orbitals that intersect at different levels, making three dimensional regions of overlapping influence, and concentric rings of likely places an electron is going to exist, and explain that in later video segments to start talking about chemistry and ionic bonds where electrons love to live in bonds of eight around a stable atom of carbon, making it's chemistry the reason for life on earth, which is the most significant achievement you can make with the discovery of the atom, that and how to make a nuclear bomb, but I prefer to look at the more fundamental aspects of life on earth, and how to preserve it and make it's wonders easily understood. Great introduction!
@humbertoalfaro1721
@humbertoalfaro1721 5 місяців тому
Good explanation, this is the type of videos that you dont want to finish
@bigscientificquestions
@bigscientificquestions 5 місяців тому
Thank you so much 😊
@RickyLeighJr
@RickyLeighJr Місяць тому
Too much too quickly…
@emnuggs5410
@emnuggs5410 7 днів тому
Skill issue
One Hour of Mind-Blowing Scientific Theories on Conscious Universe
1:12:40
Big Scientific Questions
Переглядів 1 млн
The Most Misunderstood Concept in Physics
27:15
Veritasium
Переглядів 13 млн
LIVE - Парад Победы в Москве. 9 Мая 2024
2:27:56
AKIpress news
Переглядів 2,2 млн
Something Strange Happens When You Follow Einstein's Math
37:03
Veritasium
Переглядів 8 млн
The Big Misconception About Electricity
14:48
Veritasium
Переглядів 21 млн
How do Electron Microscopes Work? 🔬🛠🔬 Taking Pictures of Atoms
19:54
A Brief History of Quantum Mechanics - with Sean Carroll
56:11
The Royal Institution
Переглядів 4 млн
Why is All Life Carbon Based, Not Silicon? Three Startling Reasons!
14:05
Android top🔥
0:12
ARGEN
Переглядів 451 тис.
M4 iPad Pro Impressions: Well This is Awkward
12:51
Marques Brownlee
Переглядів 5 млн
#Shorts Good idea for testing to show.
0:17
RAIN Gadgets
Переглядів 2 млн
Что еще за обходная зарядка?
0:30
Не шарю!
Переглядів 1,6 млн