and then imagine that 20 years ago software was more snappy than today(arguably sometimes even looked "fancier" or harder to display) and we essentially do the same with computers as we did back then but a hell of a lot less efficiently, billions of transistors, 5ghz multiple core cpus in the palm of your hand but it struggles to diplay a simple webpage because of lazy programming...

@@frozby5973 Probably because stuff like 3D rendering was not as evolved and hardware-intensive as it is now. Also multitasking was barely even a thing.

@@akisalmenaho8473 im not talking just about 3D you can see huge progress in 3D im talking in things like os, browsing, general use, why is windows taking 6gb of ram if its essentially doing the same it was 20 years ago why it takes 100% cpu usage to display a simple website that has (largely because of the minimalism trend) even less stuff on screen or on single page then ever before. Why is win 10 onwards so god damn slow. start, settings, etc are such simple things that are the same yet computers and software from 20 years ago still manage to pull up faster than new hw/sw. Everything thats based on uwp apps is painfully slow to load. Why if windows uses 6gbs of ram on idle things like start or settings are not preloaded. What is it preloading if those things have to be loaded each time regardless ? Theres just so much overhead and abstraction its honestly disgusting, it shouldnt take 500k lines of code to respond to html requests. system settings that is just a window with a blank color and a bunch of icons on top shouldnt need a 5gb/s w/r m.2 ssd to load under a second when it loaded under a second on a pc with a 20mb/s w/r 200ms delay hdd 20 years ago. I know im repeating myself but i just want to get the message across...

@@frozby5973 Website loading problem can very well be an internet issue, considering that internet usage has grown exponentially in the last 20 years. In 2002, a computer was still considered a "luxury item", and only the very top end phones used the internet back then. Nowadays every household has at least one computer (I have two, for that matter. I am a computer builder), and everyone has their phone on the interweebs 24/7. Also websites themselves have a lot more packed in them versus 20 years ago. As for hardware issues, either you have a ton of malware on your computer or you have a very entry level system. No average CPU should hit 100% just for one website. Unless I have 50 or so chrome tabs open, that is (R5 3600/5700 XT/16GB 3200, if those numbers say anything to you). Edit: Oh, and the amount of data overall has become bigger and bigger. About 12 years ago an 8GB flash drive was huge. Nowadays it's barely anything.

@@akisalmenaho8473 web page display and web aplications it indeed left behind...it could be done a tone more all all this processing power, web navigation it the same with 100MB/s or with 10Gb/s

You need like 2500 now days to get a really good rig for gaming. Maybe cheap in terms of what you are getting but a lot of people cannot afford that. And the affordability has gotten worse. Thus might open the door for more pay to play e centers, Lan centers.

@@ayliniemi Honestly computers are cheap these days. My very first computer costs a little over 2000 dollars, that got me a low spec system, a 486 when better machines were all pentiums. Today that money gets you a top of the line system.

@@ayliniemi It is not that expensive... and i can promise you it wont open the door to any lan centers or pay to play those have long been a thing of the past nowadays you can buid a gaming rig for 500 bucks that can run newer games 1080p no problem...

The only thing that is more expensive is the graphics card bc of mining. But who makes the machines that makes the cards?

​​@@ayliniemi I'm confused by your comment. No one was talking about the price of gaming PCs. They said that processors are cheap now. Given that you can get a 6 core CPU for about $100 now I would say that yes, they are cheap. Affordability of PC components (GPUs excluded) have been getting better and better over the years so I really don't know where you got that one from.

Tnx for the heads up.

Thanks

I did not understand the question about title, almost all "DIEs" is shown under microscope.

Thank you, your comment shows under this video first on the list before I was about to watch it...

Thanks for saving my time❤

Only difference is humans did it to them. 😅

They will never have thoughts , because they are non living. They need a instructor . They are simply a calculator, which are super fast at calculating.

@@squidscrew1339 Well, it hugely depends actually. What would you consider 'living' and 'non living'? And also, imo, I think it's very confined to think that only biological things can attain consciousness. I do agree that present computers are nothing more than extremely fast yet dumb calculators but given enough time and energy, computers can very well attain things we might think are impossible for them.

@@Divyam_Deep it's human who is actually developing. May be after 50 years sometimes there won't be any PC , sometimes new things may have replaced it . Human can build and upgrade to totally different things . While these machines can only do things within their space , i mean they can't invent something which is totally different at all with different functions too by itself. Human have already doing these things from the day they started living here . Humans invent things to make their life easy . Machines doesn't have life and doesn't have necessity by it's own and doesn't have mind , these are bunch of non livings , our lives that's what differentiating us from these. even humans can't play with their life , humans doesn't have any control/access over his life . He can't even hold or transfer life .even healthiest people may die , even weaker people may live . What we are doing in machines is trying to make them like us . But since we can't create our life , we cannot make them as like us , never ever . If humans have ability to create their life and hold it and transfer it etc then they may able to do make these things as humans do . But humans never ever able to do that. Whereever you live ; even without any tiny hole to escape for your life still you will die . You can't never hold of it .

@@squidscrew1339 Buddy, reading your answer I got to know two things about you and the way that you think. First, you believe that there would be emergence of some new technology that would replace the current silicon based computers and tech and secondly you are assuming that we can't make other machines self aware and sentient just because we humans can't do it to ourselves. Looking at where you are coming from, I'd say You are really confining yourself to thing the conventional way and are not really getting what all this means. I'd suggest you to take your time, research this topic, read some books about it and then perhaps we can talk at lengths about A.I and non-biological life. If you'd like to what I think and believe in than I'd say that Biological life is just like the bootstrap program for non-biological life. If you'd want some suggestions on what books and resources I'd suggest to understand this better, you can reply to this message and I'll be more than happy to share stuff with you.

Well... not we, maybe you... but certainly not 99% of humans

you are right! its amazing

Foolish brain u are

WE💨

@@LudwigvanBeethoven2 or rather not 99.999999999 of humans

The latest generation of chips was designed by A.I.

@@CharlesNiswander amazing.

@@RetroGadgetMan ukposts.info/have/v-deo/aoZopo-ipph5qWw.html

@@RetroGadgetMan There's some references! AI can do a LOT of things nowadays

They use EDA software and design by pre-compiled blocks, no one designs by individual transistors. The design must follow electronics standards for verification. AI helps in finding optimal configurations for the blocks that take up the least space, accumulate the least heat, etc.

You get all the colors because changing the angle you view it at, is changing the angle it's reflected back at to your eye. The reflected color is the wavelength of light didn't get absorbed into the surface at that angle.

Like tiny anechoic chambers for light waves, it’s incredible. The scale is so tiny that literal quantum tunneling is a predicted issue with scaling any further down, since the components are almost at an atomic scale.

​@pgtmr2713 , reflecting off the casted metal, casted man-made micro layer

Nothing will make you question your own intelligence more than studying micro fab.

I am still waiting for nanotechnology. Something akin to catalytic converters and atomic force microscope and cold fusion: a way to change bonds to Si, Ge, GaAs without heating all the die. Then grow circuits like nerves grow. Chips get faster just by being powered and downloading from npm.

But you are talking about the old computers.

@@947C.Christmas.Siletz.Benton That's fair, the fab I work for is 60 years old. I don't think we have a process node smaller than 90nm and we still work with 200mm wafers. So we'll never be a TSMC or an Intel. That being said, we're not producing 80's/90's technology, we're producing 2022 technology with in some cases 30+ year old machinery. Honestly, that's another thing I find fascinating about my job.

@@joehoisington7761 But, wouldn't you like to be the master of the technological wave that the INTEL DUO TECHNOLOGY created? Think about all of the new spending also encourage by government. You could be the father of the new photo masks.

@@joehoisington7761 where are those CPUs being used?

Lol/ Motorcycle comment :D

Most have no idea what goes on in their human -sized world 🤪

Yes I watch alot of videos but i understood this one

Вам привет из Калининграда! )