still have a lot of shovels tho

and you believe muhrica propaganda?

@@awesomemix7777 there was a time when i did, when journalists where on the ground in the hotspots and presented us with unrefined information and left us to decide for ourself. But today the media just take posts from social media and tells us that this is what we need to believe in.

There are millions of shells, not even thousands, greetings to Macron

No Worries! They've been buying Surplus aShells back channel from Ukraine. "Dad! Send More Money!"

Once a bigger brother, always a bigger brother. Ukraine is no match for Russia

France was and always will be - joke

OUCH! 9.44"

Yes, drone operators have undeployed some of them already.

@@janisvaskevics93 Russia is gonna win. Anyways. 🇨🇦

"These things" can fire tactical nuclear weapons

Really? Please corroborate and substantiate the above with facts instead of "some bloke once told me on the internets/local public toilet"

@@daveconlon5235 its capablities are hardly a state secret. you want information on it look it up and read a book. im not your mom here to do your homework for you.

@operator9858 true, you are just here to spread disinformation kiddo

@@daveconlon5235 wipe your own ass

It literally a ww2 era naval gun mounted on tracks with a few improvements

@@123456qwful Yeah, looks like Russians dug out more obsolete soviet weapons out of storages. Sure, why not ? But the question is, how useful these weapons are nowadays. They may have great range, but what about their precision? Are they going to be hit the target at least so close, that they deliver some damage to it? Without some kind of guidance system, it's unlikely.

@@123456qwfuland that makes it less lethal? It’s a massive gun that can cause massive damage even without precision rounds

​@@123456qwful😂😂

Robust Long range Krasnopol Orlan Thats all u need to know 😂😂😂

We've seen older variants of just about every vehicle in use so I wouldn't be surprised if the og Pion was out there.

@@matteusvirtanen392 correct. In WWII the Soviets used even the Napoleonic war guns on one or two occasions - it's funny but stops being funny on the receiving end of them bearing small arms only

@@AlexKarasev Artillery is artillery so you might as well use it if you have it.

@@matteusvirtanen392 100%

All end up scrap metal

You clearly haven't been keeping track of the news.. At over 300,000 losses.. 1/2 your tanks.. Inability to use your Air Force or navy. Conscripts sent to the line 3 days after they were picked up, never having used a rifle... Russia is the one who's kicking their own butts..

Can you send the link? Id like to see it too

North Korea doesn't make shells for these guns.

@@patrickweaver1105 this video states 152mm and 155mm. I believe 155mm is in error as that's an American/Western caliber, although Wiki on North Korean weaponry states an NK 155 self-propelled gun (maybe an attempted export version?). 152mm is a standard Russian gun also used by NK, given the Juche (self-reliance) doctrine I can pretty much guarantee that NK produces 152mm shells, although 122mm and 130mm are also common Commie calibers.

@@patrickweaver1105 I think you are right in terms of the big-caliber Pion and Tyulpan systems shown here, not in the North Korean army, probably doesn't produce such shells.

Kind funny they are probably Russian made!

110 kg

He doesn't know anything

Yeah no , its just a target for the drone

@@9Pivo just a target for the drones. Nothing else right. What a retreated thing to say. Ewe are a mindless herd animal slave. Thanks for showing yourself fool

Западная журналистика она везде такая. Я тут среди них живу. Это у них такая "свобода слова". 😂😂😂

у них везде так. Правда там давно никого не интересует.

@@user-tn1uy5uu1dтак возращайся к скрепам побыстрее. че там засел

Neither do the turrets ..😊

Russia has fired up to 60K artillery rounds in a single day. Obviously they have no problem supplying that amount. Ukraine and NATO not so much.

@@stuglenn1112 thanks! It though says in Defense Express 15 January : Ukraine Uses Five Times Less Artillery Ammunition Than russia - RUSI / According to the RUSI, in summer 2023, Ukraine had an advantage in artillery fire, with the ability to fire up to 7,000-7,500 artillery rounds per day, compared to russia's 5,000 rounds. Now, however, the Ukrainian rate of artillery fire has decreased to 2,000 rounds a day, while the russian invasion forces have doubled their spending up to 10,000 rounds

@@stuglenn1112 Russia has industrial capacity, many old facilities from USSR soviet era has been updated and modernized. It would take NATO at least 10 years and billions in investments to maybe reach Russias current level of production. North Korea also has enormous capacity

The video is just babble made by someoen clueles on anythign military. Notice it starts saying 5 new BREIGADES, then he brings the concept of artillery DIVISION (That do not exist, never anyone makes an artillery DIVISION) with a number out of his ass and suddenly treats brigades as DIVISIONS.

That is Ukriane, Russia has no shortage of shells.

Russia has never fought with Chechnya, only with terrorists recognized as such by the UN and most international organizations.

Cóż ukraina nie cEczenia ma broń by odpowiedzieć. Małka z powodu małej ruchliwości jest bardziej narażona na zniszczenie. Ale kaliber działa faktycznie może zrobić kuku

@@robertklimczak5630 Ukraine would have disappeared in any case, with or without weapons.

The Chechens had practically no air defense. Russia's best tactics involve helicopters.

@@patrickweaver1105 In the Chechen company, NATO-style helicopters painted black were seen, which were used to transport radical Islamist militants to Chechnya. Kozhin, the personal assistant to the Russian President for particularly important matters, spoke about this. At the same time, the Western public does not know that Chechnya was not a separate republic or territory, it was called the Chechen-Ingush region. The Ingush fought on the side of the Russian federal forces against the rebels. Now that power in Russia is in the hands of President Putin, he faces enormous efforts to keep the Chechen people from attacking the EU. The Chechens realized who their real enemy is - the EU.

Tulip about 10km, Pion about 35km

@@Truth-Istina thank you

But an accuracy of around 500m at that range (not very good).

Drones are the current fashion, very soon the anti-measures tactics will be worked out to the maximum and will not be any more effective than their other weapons. The future of drones lies in reconnaissance, special operations such as the assassination of General Haftar and the action against terrorists and possibly poorly equipped and low-tech developed armies such as Albania, Yemen, Congo... In the wars of ilola of strong and technologically advanced armies, drones have nothing to look for in a few years. Their effectiveness in such conflicts will be at the level of 5-15%... It means useless

​@@Truth-Istinaso youre saying for now drones are supririor

​@@jakewillits4678Currently, they are ahead because effective defense tactics have not yet been developed, but just as at first there was no defense against machine guns, tanks and planes, over time this has been overcome and people have found a way to defeat them. A perfect example of this is the shameful bombing of Serbia in 1999, when NATO reports spoke of the total destruction of the Serbian army, when in fact not even 5% had been destroyed. 2 tanks, 3 tanks and about 10 ordinary vehicles destroyed. More than 100,000 tons of rockets, bombs and other assets were used. Even carcinogenic depleted uranium was used. It turned out at the end of the 78-day war that NATO planes, destroyers, cruisers and regattas hit 99% of the time models and false targets. It will be the same with drones and in a few years.

​@@Truth-Istina Actual "drone" is simple radio controlled unmanned aircraft with bomb attached - of course if enemy has broadband jammers, such drone is useless. But you must consider future drones - completely autonomous with good optics and some AI on board and strategy of hunter/killer. Or anti-jammer drones navigating by jammer signal to destroy it. That type of drones can't be jammed or disabled with electronic warfare, only shot down by anti-aircraft fire. This is the future of combat aerial drones.

​@@ferosofranek8817 Since I have been dealing with military topics for over 25 years and therefore studying tactics, my opinion is that in the next few years there will be a battle between drones and defense units. There will be all kinds of attempts at innovation, success and failure. One of the forms of combat is jammers and they are effective against aircraft that are dependent on radio command and operator control. Distractions are the perfect solution. However, soon there will be a large number of spacecraft that fly on a predetermined trajectory and do not depend on the radio connection but on the GPRS signal, and there is a solution in the form of jamming the GPRS signal. Of course, when inertial navigation is done, the effect of jamming the GPRS signal will be drastically reduced. The third phase will be based on artificial intelligence, which will not only recognize targets on its own, but will be able to move around the front on its own without correction of the human factor based on GPRS coordinates, Inertial coordinates and even on the basis of terrain images and with the help of finding orientation points. This will be a serious problem because it will be impossible to interfere with a spacecraft that is standalone 10 There will finally have to be an emphasis on the physical destruction of the aircraft. However, the low cost and the large number of aircraft will cause problems for the missile defense as well as the lack of dowel and radar reflection. My opinion is that the universal solution for all possible types of spacecraft lies in the development of optical observation stations (TV, IC, UV, contrast), and cannon systems in calibers from a minimum of 30mm to a maximum of 57mm. The reason for this is, low cost, rapid response, passive mode, sufficient range and available 3P bursting ammunition. Such systems as Russian Pantsir-S 30mm and Derivation 57mm, German Cheetah, Chinese HQ2000, Serbian PASARS16 will have to be produced in large quantities and 100% cover the troops 24/7/365

Btw, usas artillery shell smarter than your whole parliament !

@@xmetris What parliament? Where?

Pentagon ? USA ?@@KK-gr9df

You're serious aren't you. That's cute

@@junglejarred6366 I’m smart as in SMArt 155 artillery shells in Ukraine. 🤣

But the BRAIN is not so great ! Thinking !!!!

​@@ferdiand007The Russian brain is the best brain.

@@ferdiand007 ewe sound like another mindless herd animal slave. Thanks for showing up

Like which1😂

Incorrect, and most of those have long since been destroyed

@@stephenbarnes8817 They have long since been destroyed but have tripled in number since 2019...? Stop drinking that Nato Kool-aid man

They have bigger rounds but they can't hit anything.

@@TobiasHinz1992 true, Russias accuracy is well known to be inaccurate, and not close to what nato built weapons can offer. They seem to still believe in Stalins old saying. Quantity has a quality. In this case the quantity has been greatly reduced by the efficiency, creativeness, and outright bravery of the Ukrainian people.

Yes and no. Russia is great with trains. Trucks not so much.

@patrickweaver1105 Maybe there is a practical reason. Russia has 11 time To move equipment from the Urals to the west definitely trains are more efficient. But they have domestic truck brands like Kamaz and Graz that can be ramped up when necessary. During WW2 Soviets produced a total of 36K Gaz, 18K Zis, YAaZ and Ural Zis in 1941. The last 2 brands picked up production in '42. trucks were produced the next year for a total of 205,000 trucks through 1945 which is a remarkable achievement considering they bore the brunt of the entire Wermacht and while fighting . 4 million Nazis , 1 million Fins, Italians , Hungarians , Bulgarians , Romanians and other eastern European Allies ( determined to join in the war of exterminating Russians ), 6000 tanks in 4 Tank armies , 3000 aircraft , 10000 artillery, whilr fighting Barbarossa they relocated 2000 heavy industries on 200000 railcars , while producing tanks, artillery , aircraft , submarines, katyushas, ships , ammunition etc. All while fighting a ruthless Nazi determined to exterminate them. The 2021 SMO is a very small operation for the Russians. Their economy continues to grow at 5%. So I would be wary of Russian critics and be cognisant that the Russians have a serious proven capacity for total war and not underestimate them to produce what they need. An analysis of what we buy from them indicates they have raw materials and rare earth minerals we need not to mention finished titanium parts for Boeng, NK33 (RD161) rockets for our Atlas program, If I had been in Putin's shoes , I would have simply stopped selling oil to the Indians so Europe ends up in a recession and economic collapse But no ....not Vlad . Engaged in conflict with an Ignorant and implacable enemy he wants to be reasonable. So naturally, the neocons think the Russians are weak and ignorant of their potential . Smh.

@@johnweerasinghe4139 Russia is not the Soviet Union. It's a lot harder to recruit cannon fodder when you can't threaten to kill them and their families. What we were buying from them was because it was cheaper. Not because we can't access it elsewhere or mine it ourselves. Ukraine has its own problems but those don't diminish the ones Russia is facing. It was an ill-considered move to invade Ukraine. People like to inflate the amount the allies have spent on Ukraine but most of it was slated to be destroyed because it's becoming obsolete. The whole world is on the verge of a technological revolution and Russia is spending money on the invasion rather than rearming.

Doesn't seem ewe are paying attention

no they wanted kyiv

@@maxmock2661No they didn't and they still don't want Ukraine. Zelensky is the best General Russia has got why on earth would they want to remove him?

Clown to become general? Cocaine talk @@user-zs5nr8dd1z

@@user-zs5nr8dd1z zelensky is the reason russia hasnt yet won this war and russia made several attempts to assassinate him and to take kyiv but gave up because they were defeated

When your getting one side information on a daily basis and easily susceptible to propaganda, you'd believe anything.. The truth of the matter is Ukraine can not beat Russia, when you have to grab people off the street kicking and screaming, you know your in trouble

That is why careful selection of sources is so important. People like MacGregor, Ritter and Larry Johnson were telling how it was all along. Predictability of opinions, that's what counts.

@@bartoszkuklinski90 So your curated selection of "sources" is a salty colonel who was angry he never got promoted to general because he was a hot headed idiot and a convicted child molester, both of whom receive monthly paychecks from Russian government owned RT, and who's claims literally surpass the propaganda numbers of the Russian government itself? Really fine selection you have there. I'd trust a crack addict from underneath an overpass more than those two idiots. At least the druggy doesn't try to appear credible.

Take every single bit of info with a massive bit of salt both sides in this conflict loves to blast mass propaganda. Personally I’ve been seeing a shit ton of pro Ukrainian propaganda both from the Ukrainians themselves and from anti Russian news sources, I know that the Russians also use propaganda although I’ve not been as a exposed to it myself as I’ve been to the pro Ukrainian and if you actually read some of these it is just plain propaganda, I’ve seen pro Ukrainian ones claiming that the Russians have lost 500k troops and 5 000 tanks

Erm.... could it be because the Western mainstream media has been lying to us about pretty much everything in regard of the war in Ukraine... Russian meatwave attacks, fighting with shovels, out of missiles for over a year, having lost half a million of soldiers while Ukraine has lost zero troops, their morale is high after the summer offensive reached Crimea... umm... I do wonder :D

thats not english mr big brain...

No ivan, these were destroyed long ago. Old video and info

@@stephenbarnes8817ofc but Russia has a large production capacity and deployment capacity.

That's only viable if you have total air supremacy, which is wishful thinking in a near-peer conflict (eg: russo-ukrainian conflict). The USA and allies mainly took on goat herders with rusty AKs and RPG-7s, not conventional, well supplied armies, and took the wrong conclusions from those wars.

⁠@@AWZoolthat is partly true but the 2003 Iraqi army was a conventional army and considered the 4th largest.

@@AWZool and they still lost to goat herders. I don't think Americans can win a war by themselves.

@@AWZool Nonetheless, I am not disputing the reasons, but who would have thought that without air dominance the modern battlefield turns into a WWI style meatgrinder. It may preclude a major escalation- who's going to be willing to throw milions of people to fight trench warfare under heavy bombardement? Neither the Americans, nor the Russians if they were to try to fight. I am no military specialist but I think chances of nuclear exchange became more likely (?).

@@MyGFIsMariayes but it was still a concentrated attack on a distant enemy. Russia did this in Syria quite successfully

They lost everything in Martz 2022. Now only pictures left! Go back to sleep!

They are obviously saving their best equipment for a potential confrontation with a more significant adversary. Ukraine is for the Russians a military operation and not a full scale war.

donot count on it

There are huge stocks of shells for T55 and t54 in warehouses. Where should I put them? Apart from these tanks, they are not needed anywhere. In this case, the tanks are conventional self-propelled artillery platforms. In my opinion, it is quite logical to spend their shells

Since for use as a mobile artillery piece as you've pointed out, or to a drone or a Javelin it makes very little difference which tank it is, yes, the Russians are big on using up the old crap first. Once the top-attack active defense means and tactics evolve, and also in situations where the action is more about mobility, they can deploy more of the newer stuff.

makes sense @@borfer9366

Dreams Dreams!!!! Russia has already won, remember Russia never retreats!!!!! Once again NEVER

How many braincells do you have in your head?

im sure they are, but this can corrected.

LOL! Lucky we have all these war thunder vets advising us on the quality of Russia's ammo.

single digit IQ..get off the internet and stop making a fool of yourself.

They re firing those monsters like 20km away from the ennemy, If theres anything that can hit the crew at this range, no amount of protection would save em anyway.