Isn't this a 1080p card

Fact 👍🏻

😅😂

You're totally right

Amd is more wack with their 7600 and 7600xt. The only impressive in 4060 ti is its performance and power but the price is not acceptable.

And 7600xt should be $5 ,,, weak product from a company that never fails to fail

@@tilapiadave3234 which graficcard under 350 would you recommend?

@@kingofthefuture6564 Tough part of the market ,, if I was after something to keep for a while I'd look for a used rx 6800xt

Xbox series S runs new games at sub HD upscaled to 1080p and 30fps. Waste of $$

then get a console bro, and pay for online😂😂😂

Xbox series S has weaker GPUs than RX 7600 XT. It often runs sub 1080p without 60 fps mode. Still viable option: less performance for less money.

to me its just a period of technology stuck or even a agreement between the two companies,because they new series uplift 10 procent performance only. is this a joke ? and people buying the same stuff. crazy

As mentioned before, Series S uses upscaling and 30FPS lock. Also keep in mind a PC is much more versatile than a Console. Work, Office, Internet, and so on. Not to mention for every Console game there are round about 100 PC games.

Gaming is a bad thing but from the beginning both nvidia and amd said from the beginning that they are aimed at working people, that is a good price of course with a new card but if optimizing costs for work I think Still should invest a little more and get the old rtx 3090 hc 3090ti.

10GB or 12GB the 4060 Ti needed 16GB for the 4070 TI and 16-20GB for the 4080 would’ve been best

You either have enough vram or you dont. Nobody complains the 3090 has 24gb of vram even though no game uses that much and likely wont until after the ps6 comes out.

No you want at least 12gb of vram even in 1080p as of today. That is because Game Devs are starting to utilize VRAM because of GPU VRAM leap since 2021. Now we are seeing it in some games, i.e. if you don't have enough VRAM the game might work but use the RAM as VRAM but now you have fewer overall FPS. The newest update is when you have not enough VRAM then the game will crash and require you to lower the setting to reduce VRAM usage, yes even in 1080p. It's always either of the two... But I think the new update will be use more often in the future games and game updates. Which is why you want a 1080p GPU with 12GB of VRAM since 12 will be good enough. While for 1440p 12GB is just a bare minimum but still not enough, means you need a 16GB VRAM so yeah the current sweet spot is 16GB for 1440p & 12GB for 1080p.

Also having 16gb in both 7600xt & 4060ti is not bad at all. What's not good enough are 1440p GPUs that has 12GB VRAM it should be 16GB as bare minimum.

Rx 580 was high-end card. Chip in rx7600 too weak to run future games

6700 xt better over 7600 xt for a similar price... such a useless card even with 16gb vram, you will not hit the vram wall because it's too weak in rasterization. also 128bit bus is not great...

@@kushan8113 what was high end about it? performance was at the time it was weaker than 1070 and competed with the 1060 vega 56 and vega 64 both were more powerful not to mention the rx 590

Wanted less? Lol

Chipset cheaper than software

Wanted to give you excuse so they can sell it while maintaining nvidia like actions that's why

I think it's marketing. Previous generations had eight, competitors already have sixteen. It was necessary to give the buyer a “psychologically” competitive product with a reserve for the future.

​@@T1MKA_375no doubt a marketing what an a excuse for you to have the same graphics card with just more memory like amd thinks consumers will buy this trash (unfortunately there are some) but who go online to see "analysis" more like test of its performance will make a better buy cuz they know to what perhaps they'll expect when they buy the actual product

Talvez por causa de maior cache l3?

A 7900 XTX foi feita para concorrer contra a rtx 4080 jamais contra rtx 4090 essa sua comparação esta muito errada. A 7900 XT concorre com rtx 4070 TI. 7800 XT contra rtx 4070 e etc melhor pesquisar antes cara.

You guys don't get how VRAM works lol it could say 10gb and still only use 4gb. It's ALLOCATED MEMORY.....

Allocation vs utilization. Go learn that.

Yes nvidia uses texture compression, but in some games you get blurrier images when the game uses too much vram but thats rare

Waste of sand.

​@@saricubra2867waste of market

correct me if i am wrong but wont the 16gb vram come in handy in the long run?considering the price of both cards

@@forbie4404 no 16GB is not needed in these graphic card

​@@kimo4530yeah, this gpu's are never gonna touch 4k thus making every bit of that vram useless. Even at 2k gaming it's useless in my opinion.

Should buy 4070 or 7600xt?

AMD might be trying to maximize performance by loading more into the RAM before it’s actually needed or Nvidia may be doing the opposite to conserve memory since most of their models are not very generous with RAM capacity. Seems like Nvidia is pretty purposely giving us just enough RAM to keep the card comfortable for 2-3 years that way we’ll run into a bottle neck and be pressured to upgrade. Idk regardless it isn’t really a problem when you get so much RAM in AMD cards these days.

@@johnmoore1495 It's not entirely true that games on xbox So it can be said that the fact that on PC gpu with 8gb of vram cannot play games at 1080p is absurd, it's all due to bad optimization, you need to know that the technology and level of hardware usage of the game over time depends on depends on how much the current console hardware can handle and it's easy to say that currently the most advanced generation consoles only have 16 Gb of ram and it uses SOC so the maximum consumption for the game can only be falls into 13 - 14 gb and certainly in native 4k the remaining 2 - 3 gb must be left for the system to run

NVIDIA GPUs require a lot more RAM in contrast. There you can find the gigs that AMD have in their VRAM which it should be used for

@@chetu6792 not always. in hitman they both require same amounts of normal ram. in forza horizon 5 amd requires more vram and more regular ram too.

nvidia simply superior ,, and AMD releases yet another space heater

4070 super or 7800XT would be good options. If you want to spend a little more, you could go for 4070Ti super or 7900XT. For CPU, almost anything from Zen 4 will be good, just skip 7600x and 7700x. The non-X models are basically the same performance for cheaper

Thanks @@williamscott6209

rx 6800 gpu with a 5700 x3d cpu.that will leave you with 800 bucks to buy any mobo and case you want with enough money to get over 4 terabytes of storage. There's no need to blow all your budget on overpriced gpus. Take a look at the games you want to play. All the best games coming out are Indie games that will run on modest hardware. You can save on your budget to get a good monitor and other stuff.

@@darkkingastos4369 Thanks broo

@@williamscott6209 okk i will consider

Я 4060ti 8гб за 35 брал

4070 по 50 бывают. По 60 это уже 4070 ti или super.

Yup that's what I was thinking.

No

in the future 8gb wont be enough

They better not make more GPU's like it

If you could wait half a year it would be good Right now the rx 6700xt is much much better But rx 7600xt may get better than it cuz of drivers maturity in 7000 series

6700xt if you want the av1 encoder that's about the only advantage it will ever have

oops I meant the 7600 sorry

6700xt if you can find it cheaper than a 7600xt. Almost identical performance + you can save bucks for future upgrade.

It's because of the bus size, we saw how Nvidia had to raise the 4070Ti Super bus to 256-bit in order to fit 16GBs in that card, if they kept the 192-bit bus, the only other option would be 18 or 24 but 4GB VRAM chips doesn't exist and the card doesn't have space in the back for extra chips.

@@marcelosoares7148 that is my point. The ti super should be the original ti in the 1st place. 16gb instead of 12gb. They change the bus size anyway with the super

its just msi afterburner bug, the actual memory speed is 9000 mhz, notice that both of these gpus have 2250 mhz memory (18gbps effective if it is devided by 2 it will now show actual memory speed in mhz)

Because the 6700xt and even the 6700 actually cost slightly more at retail than the 7600xt does at retail, while being roughly the same performance but with the 7600xt being newer. Seriously though, if you have no interest in the 7600xt why does it bother you and just about every other nerd here, in the comments for a video about a gpu you have no interest in?!

@@scbond You're saying i'm wrong for commenting on a GPU performance under a vid that's about GPU performance? Alright dude. Yeah now i see 7600xt costing the same. Also what is 6700 without xt?

7700xt will smoke it

Nobody games at 8K. Not even with a 4090

This surely has to be a sarcastic comment.

True LOL, it runs crap even on my 4080.

You are wrong. 7600xt is 7600 with just a 16gb ram. You just paying more money for the vram and minimal increase. 6700xt is a lot better.

@@zilverman7820 After multiple years the 7600XT will stand its own, not only due to the vram but probably also by optimization. In my country the 7600XT is also about 40$ cheaper so although it's not an amazing card by any means it's honestly not that bad.

@@Atomicvex06 but look at the performance its almost the same as a 7600 and the price is a lot higher.

@@zilverman7820 yea but a lot more vram, 8gigs just isn't enough for a lot of games at 1080p anymore and certainly not at 1440p. This is not a bad card for 330$ if you are upgrading from a few generations back

И цену

No, they are 1080p cards. But a lot of people want to see how much head space there is, regarding to how long it will provide them with a decent performance.

Absolutely, you watched the video right? Both were able to put out more than 60fps in most of the games, apart from couple of poorly optimized games such as scamfield, AW2 etc. And this is with ultra, if you turn settings down by notch or fiddle a bit then you're gonna get more fps, most probably looking at 80+ fps, moreover you know there's no visual upgrade using ultra vs high (as demonstarted in a DF video) settings.

The cards have a 128bit memory bus which means quad channel memory, you can't fit 12GB on quad channel.

only in cyberpunk and alan wake 2. some of the lesser known rt games amd cards perform quite close to nvidia ones, from metro exodus to dying light

I don't suppose anyone would aim for RT with either of these cards, maybe low RT is doable, but ideally for best RT performance you're at least looking for 4070.

I have to imagine that will change in a few weeks In the US, the 4060Ti 16GB is US$120 more

No generalices, no es lo mismo el precio en argentina, Guatemala o México.

@@kevinmendozamanzano6838 principalmente en Sudamérica se nota más la diferencia

In Brazil same price

Not here in Brazil

I wouldn't class any of these cards as 1440p tbh.

​@@ornatus96166700xt is 1440p card

Hold my dlss, dlaa, dldsr, Nvidia broadcast, driver stability, raytracing performance, encoding performance, Nvidia reflex, video super resolution upscaling, the new hdr tool

​@@saulnotgoodman550most of that is available in Radeon as well with different name 😂

​@@saulnotgoodman550Hold my $100 that I saved for going red and 3 Big Macs too.

конечно, амд шлак

less power

Ммм, отобъется за 50 000 часов :D

​​​@@rsh2099от балды прикинул тут: если взять дефолтного работягу, который стабильно играет 3 часа каждый день на карте от зеленых, которая в нагрузке примерно на 50Вт экономичнее карты от красных, то в год мы имеем примерно 1113 часов наигрыша и приблизительно 54 кВт сэкономленной электроэнергии, что в денежном эквиваленте при среднероссийских 5р/кВт равняется экономии 273 рублей в год. Да, у западных товарищей 1 кВт электроэнергии значительно дороже, но и зарплаты пропорционально выше, в итоге получается примерно та же самая разница в соотношении. Хотелось бы немного пояснить за 2 момента: 1) в расчет бралось то, что человек будет играть КАЖДЫЙ день по 3 часа, далеко не все наиграют столько часов за год, но и есть люди, кто наиграет больше 2) примерная разница в 50 Вт между картами только в самых тяжелых играх, в более старых или менее требовательных к железу совершенно необязательно, что карта будет загружена на все 100%, и тогда потребление сократится, как и разница в пиковой мощности между картами.

@@MakeYourVision Не у каждого есть мощный блок питания. Мне просто не хочется 8 тыщ за новый блок питания отдавать...Так бы купил 3080 на авито за 40к.Эх..

@@andrewkalapan9117 вы увидели и смогли ответить на мой коммент? А то я сейчас открываю уведомления, вижу ваш ответ, перехожу по ссылке - нет моего коммента, будто удален. Открываю в пк версии - тоже самое, пустота, только ваш ответ в никуда.

Wow didn't noticed it. I find this better than a bit more fps

@@Ravecat27 Exactly

I don't think so... Wich is the video have you watched?? Frame time of 4060ti is always bettere guys, please But bot cards are peace pf crap for value

Lol no it's not you clown.

No AMD have bad 0.1% and 1% especial in E sports games like Fortnite and pubg and cs2

Did you watch the video? Besides Starfield all of the 2023 games used more than 8GB, frame gen would add even more memory usage.

No. Just what lharsay has said.

Frame generation itself sometimes use 1 gb vram and 8GB is not enough for 1440p

When you turn on ray tracing and frame generation, the amount of RAM exceeds 8 GB even at 1080p resolution.

Alan wake 2 que usa novas tecnologias discorda do seu comentario. O futuro para jogos pesados com novas tecnologias vai exigir muito das placas e 8 GB ja esta fracassando. Agora se for para cod, fifa, minecraft etc ai ok

The RTX 4060 TI 16gb is better. Just it's price the issue.

I dont know what you’re talking about lol. Both are same price and both are same performance and both are shit. Everything the same.

Since everything is the same, do you prefer to buy which of the two cards??@@Soimy

@@MockingCat technically i like the 4060 ti more cause of dlss and ray tracing but its not like its running ray tracing anyway and you can just get the fsr 3 mod in most games now. But I still think both are shit

Right! So if you yourself are saying that you would buy the RTX 4060 TI then you are contradicting yourself in relation to your first statement! Have a good time...@@Soimy

@@MockingCat I didn’t say I would buy it lol. I said if I had to that I would rather have the 4060 ti. But I actually have a 7800 xt which is probably way better than your card lmao. And i dont know why you’re trying to make beef because i think that the 4060 ti is shit lol. Go check any review. They all say it’s shit.

AMD always looses..... Meanwhile 7900XTX beats 4080, 7900Xt beats 4070ti and 7800xt beats 4070. And all that while also being cheaper. The only advantage Nvida has is Raytracing performance, but that comes at a price while 99,9% of all games doesn't even have Raytracing.

@@walther2492 OpenGL are very well optimized on nvidia, so in terms of Emulators like 3ds, switch beats AMD to be honest.

@@AntiGrieferGames You are right, but how many people make real use of that? 1% to 3%? And what about Vulcan, where AMD is far better optimized? It's an argument, for sure, but unfortunately not a good one.

​@@walther2492 Also, he didnt considered that Wii and Switch emulators are really light and almost every GPU can run that without a issue

@@walther2492 How in the hell it’s better when the 4090 kicks all amd cards ass wtf😂😂you can’t be better if you cannot beat the king of the card the 4090. Let’s be honest they said the 7900 xtx will beat the 4090 until they realize it couldn’t compete they started comparing it too the 4080. Explain that? The 4080 super is on the way tho and it’s going to smack the xt & xtx

KKKK aí aí, esqueceu das outras rx...

Said the Nvidia fanboy🤦