D'Souza is a masochist. He gets slaughtered in every debate.

damn I wish I still lived there 😢

Is the Bible true? Snooze... settled argument. Nothing new under the sun. Went sailing. Met Poseiden. Changed my whole operating system. Is Poseiden true? Talk amongst yourselves. Does literature have truth value? Poetry? Is it true? Difference between truth and wisdom?? Time for a nap.

D'Sousa? Really? Isn't he a convicted felon?

Bla bla bla

Not looking and engaging in the right place

@@thebritishbushman8389 agreed

"Fabric of the Cosmos" was the first physics book which clicked for me. The way he combined theory with experimental results and really clear explanations just made sense all of a sudden. PBS spacetime is amazing too. Got me through lockdown....

Hehe. Love that. Me too

Diogenes and George Carlin.

AI may, give an idea. Hmmm.. i never thought about it before. Ask AI to creat conversation between famous philosophers.😊

@@alexb6695 what a nice idea.. if we have a lot of content then this will happen... for those who miss their loved ones and have enough content to feed the AI about how their loved ones spoke, their views on myriad topics.

I scratched my armpits while contemplating your comment.

Did you remind him that he and apes came from the same ancestor?

And that ancestor looked a hell of a lot like an ape

Was he wearing a maga hat?

​@@frankmay1563 We humans and apes are all considered Great Apes or hominids.

Also, lets remember. Everyone is built different, not to mention their unique work environments. Rational-thinking scientists are no exception. Some popular science educators are less comfortable offending Christians/Muslims than others. Sam is not afraid to wrestle in the mud, despite his calm demeanor whilst donning a smart, black suit. Others in a teaching positions in academia, say Professor Greene, may have religiously affiliated peers/students to contend with on weekdays, may be cautious of backlashes.

You should stop listening to jews

@@ssotkow "cautious of backlashes" Depends how much you want to hit people with that "carrot" - it is bound to get someone to hit back (hopefully proportionately and not loss of a job). The idea that atheism is so so *SO... clear in all its positions, would raise an eye brow🤨 from many atheists (not just theists)

Speaking from experience? No matter what, you're going to pick up a intellectual stink no matter where you go. Being brainwashed is something no one escapes, yourself included. The sooner you realize this, you gain the ability to choose what brainwash you get. What you think doesn't exist probably doesn't exist. That doesn't mean there is no God. I am really curious what it belief means. There are things I know to be true, like the earth is an oblate spheroid that revolves around the sun. I can't make myself believe the earth is a flat disk. Just like you know there is no God, I don't know if you can make yourself believe in God. I don't know if we have control over what we believe in.

As a university lecturer I can attest to the backlash potential. Depts are vigilant and context can be lost in the retelling of a so-called incident.

This talk was around 5-6 years ago.

@@FISHDINHO And in the meantime, it looks like string theory isn't all that was hoped for. Seems to me that progress in physics is hitting a wall.

​@@Micas099theres a clear pass scientists been whispering among themselves, but main stream cant stand it. Theres tone of good leads and ideas connected to multi universe theory. But it opens can of warms. Many uncomfortable questions, scientists dont wont to face.

He leads great meditations

Agree! Now read the comment section and feel your faith in humanity crumble. Can't believe what I'm reading. I guess I shouldn't be surprised. Thank you for your sensible and positive comment! 😊

@@darktower0603 😭😭😭

And there’s no need to use BOTH sides of the toilet paper.

Perhaps there isn’t one?

All that typing just to say something so stupid

@@tonycucca4499 All that typing? lol Oh yeah, all that typing. It must've taken a whole 3 minutes to type. My hands were all cramping up. I don't know how I do it! I'm curious......Have you said those things I mentioned in my comment? Is that what's got you so sensitive?

​@@tonycucca4499 I just want to point out something that's really REALLY bothering me. And this doesn't really have anything to do with you tonycucca4499. And this comment will be a long one, certainly by your standards. Read it......Don't read it. I don't really care, I just need to vent for a minute. It has to do with UKposts, and how much I am hating this site more and more as time goes on. It has to be run by absolutely incompetent people. My comment to you tony was not entirely the comment I had intended. Basically, you called my comment st***d. And by all means, you are allowed your opinions. I essentially called your comment st***d right back, for the reasons that I put in my first response to you. Yet, for some unfathomable reason, my comment would be immediately flagged every time I would try to send it. This confused me. Certainly it wouldn't flag a comment for using the word st***d, of all things, would it? Not to mention, it was used by tony in his comment which was obviously not flagged and removed. So why do they continue to remove my comment? And that is the big problem. It is UKposts's ridiculously unfair and extremely vague rules and policies. What gets one person flagged, others will get away with. It's making me despise a site that I've been a huge fan of for many years.

@@jeremybr2020I don't think you were hugged enough as a child

@@tonycucca4499 What spot on deduction skills you have. You nailed it. Because I'm annoyed at UKposts's perplexing ways......clearly it was because I wasn't hugged enough as a child. What brilliance. lol You know, for someone who thought my first comment was st***d, you have done nothing but surpass that st***dity with every comment you make.

exactly. except i think its called a theory more due to its math and physics proofs.

Need to be called horse shite

if it's testable , will no longer be a theory.

@@bornatona3954science ain’t bs

@@kennypowers1945 I agree but this isn't science...just fantasy covered by artificial formulas

And old McDonald had a farm.

Self aware..?

What a low effort and tired comment. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Hilarious.

Nah. Nothing will happen. Science orientated people will be interested, religious people will adapt ("God created them as well"), normies will hear it and shrug

Religions like Islam will gladly and easily claim aliens are creations of God. I've already seen Muslims rule that possible aliens would be.

@@michaelkupfer3723 Depends on the religion that will be around, yes the sheep will always follow suit, and swallow whatever lies religion feeds them. But some will wake up, and see how idiotic religion truly is. Depending on what type of religion will be present

Nope only your corrupt reasoning and ignorance will be what dooms you and your kind of anti human

I mean - who knows WHAT’S gonna happen…?

don't appear to be...looks like botwork

Finally, Ha! I had to scroll down a ways to find this, I was starting to doubt my sanity..

I think it has to do with the fact that pangburn hasn’t made any new content in… I mean it honestly feels like over a year or even years. They release clips and excerpts of the same two talks over and over and over. They post the clips a bit dishonestly too with extremely click baity titles. I think it discourages fresh organic comments and it basically just leaves a dead cess pool of bots.

@@ericgraham8150 good point. It's a shame. They had some really good content.

Because of their farts?

You will find the demon within you..

Thank you. Please describe what you see or comprehend. I suspect you are correct on more levels than currently calculated. Teach me something. (To be fair I will hold you accountable) Tread cautiously Not for my benefit.. but do so for everyone. Thx :)😅 Jeremy

Thy Lord suckled thy prong mightily.

I'm no expert, but from what I understand, the symbols (language) are invented, and then we discover the complex patterns that can be built with them, and then use experiments and predictions to see which patterns best map onto the real world.

I disagree that killing animals for the pleasure of tasting them is not good. We can respectfully disagree because morality is not objective or universal. For me, it’s not a moral issue either way. The pleasure is an outcome of our evolutionary history, which is neutral. Wanting to experience pleasure is reasonable, and it comes down to how one values the life of an animal. I personally hold life as a commodity on Earth. We exclude humans from the menu for social mores I accept because I don’t want to be on the menu, not because I value your life.

@@chemquests sure the universe does not care and has not given an objective moral code for us to live by. The fact that the chair in my room and the room i sit in doesn't care whether I go out and kill random people tomorrow doesn't matter to me personally. We might not have a conclusive answer we can still have arguments that are more desirable even if that's subjective. I personally value empathy and discipline . Discipline is needed for many things if you don't want to live as a cynic. Amongst one of them having pleasures elsewhere for the sake of a higher value of empathy. For example, How would I feel if tomorrow aliens come to our planet or AI robots take over and they see us as a delicious treat. I know I would not want to be eaten. If they created humans that somehow are altered so they can't think about it and are more like other animals so they suffer less and then eat those versions , I don't think I'd want to be the feeling organism that has that happen to them still. Is that going to be watertight all the way. No. But it's surely enough to guide my behavior. It will help me not go on a killing spree for example if I were to have such an urge. Not punch my boss in the face for no particular reason besides it bringing me pleasure. And many other things. So mentioning objective morality is useful to disagree sure. However if I were to be a person deriving pleasure from killing someone and be interviewed by the press. Would the proper response be that morality is objective. Should that be what we default to when we kill a living being for the sake of pleasure. Now is a human the same as other animals no. But it's about the default to morals are objective whenever we know we probably could have more discipline and not kill a living being while pursuing pleasure in many other ways. In that way we would value empathy, discipline and pleasure as well. It would not be negated, what would be negated is something else a less virtuous way of handling lives of living beings

@@Contribute_TakeCare_Learn_Play I appreciate your clear thinking; I generally resent the tone of moral superiority many vegans adopt. Someone else’s ethical motivations don’t compel me by any necessity, but I can be persuaded if there are good reasons. For example the carbon footprint of a cow and the environmental impact of hog farming pushes me to reduce my consumption of those products dramatically. The experience of the animal is simply not important to me, but a sustainable lifestyle is relevant to everyone. Persuading you or anyone else how they should eat seems a bad use of my time, including the aliens of your hypothetical example. There’s no principled argument I could make to them unless there’s a reasonable appeal to their self interest, such as health implications (supposing we clog their arteries or such). Michael Pollan does a good job at presenting these types of arguments.

@@chemquests thanks for the compliment and the potential need for Introspection. I'm not a vegan though and the tone probably comes from the fact that I talk to myself that way which might be why I keep being vegetarian. And I never talk about this IRL unless the discussion is started by someone else. (Or see a vid). Additionally if the world was filled with people killing people for fun. I would probably also have posted in that manner. It's difficult to make moral claims without coming of a bit preachy or judgemental, as you are making a judgment on what should happen. To me if not killing living beings of any kind for pleasure is not seen as a good value to hold I don't know what is. I think we can use our reasoning to think for other beings (I mean living beings that can't reason), ideally that would be with not too much bias. Just like most would agree we would help a person with a disability organizing their life and in other areas. The fact that the dead universe does not care does not matter, we can use all our collective faculties reason , empathy, not just one which does count for both to determine what would be best. And to me the most basic rule is to not kill for pleasure. To not take a frog and blow it up and laugh at it. To not take a dog . Bind it and stab it while drinking your cola. Quite a reasonable foundation to build a deemed objective accepted socially constructed moral code to understate it.

@@Contribute_TakeCare_Learn_Play sorry if I implied your tone; I was trying to say that I preferred your approach to some vegans I had interacted with in the past.

The Royals all live in the family house, work in the family business and have arranged marriages. Now you can’t get more Indian than that. Except Charles, he's African.

It may inspire ideas to be built upon, but it’s not like they described quantum mechanics. This is a critique for any & all ancient text, not uniquely Hinduism.

I recommend refining that for yourself some more, and then reevaluating your position.

@@rileykurama No refining necessary or revaluation either.