lmao, can confirm

BRO I WOULD LOVE TO SEE THAT

Bollywood uses nuclear explosives only 😝😂

What about african movies

@@NavrajThapa2002 lmao stfu -_-

Very good 😂😂

well said sir

It would be realistic if Arnold Schwarzenegger joined the Military.

What??? My childhood movie hero was a lie??😂😂

Bob Houghton I laughed so hard, thank you for this

Think you missed his point. It is unlikely a broad daylight raid would happen. But then he said, but due time lines, they might have to. People should listen to what he actually says.

@@dalj4362 I think you should have paid attention to everything that I said as well.

@@dalj4362 I listened, and its quite clear he hasnt a clue about the historical events. No point pointing out how unrealistic a scene is when that is in fact, exactly what happened in real life. He does not acknowledge documented events in this video.

Yeah, this video should have been about fictional battle scenes. He wouldn’t know the historical detail of the real life incidents to know if the film makers had been accurate or not. He’s just guessing.

Agreed, these videos always seem to have at least one movie like this when the “expert” reviewing either hasn’t seen the movie to understand the context or doesn’t know enough about the event the movie may be based on. In this case i’m kinda shocked he didn’t know more about the movie/incident. I would have thought that it would have been used as a teaching tool for special ops teams worldwide - maybe it’s just in the planning. But yeah he should have said, this was a bad idea, because of this incident it’s no longer how it’s typically done or at least the risk levels are much better known. Also 6/10??? Cause of the grenade launcher? Should’ve been much higher

I didn’t know that thanks. The movie is one of my favorites

I think there is even a monument based on his lading dedicated to all paratroopers in St-Mere Eglise

I didn't know his name, but knew a soldier had that experience. Good old days when history channel actually showed history. (Kids back then wondered aloud why History channel was mostly a WWII shrine in programming.)

Isn't the parachute still there?

@@polreamonn Yes it is, along with a model/figure of soldier dangling from it. Cool stuff.

Greg Alman hol up

He's also a business man apparently.

Thats funny. He must be hercules

Who also married a Kennedy

This is true

All that's left is the swearing

It's f*cking ra...war you donkey!

If he found a victim of a napalm strike would he complain about it being burnt?

that's ant Middleton

Maybe gordon should stick to cooking

Love the acronym for Flame Assault SHoulder. Definitely wanted it to sound cool, and it does!

Looks like you just copied and pasted from wiki.

@@chrisburns143 Thanks... I guess.

And definitely not a nuclear weapon

@@idiotbuster8662 my man, he was not serious when he said that

And rupture your aorta. That can happen even in a minor car accident, let alone an explosion, and it's one of the most common ways victims die.

@Gareth Tucker I've stood about 15m away from 7lbs of C4 going off. You feel the force of it but theres no real kickback. I was holding a blanket though lol

This is true. Something Hollywood doesn’t to want to know, because a real grenade or explosive isn’t as visually stimulating. The more flash and fire just means you’re expending the energy on just that, a light show. You want all of that power in the concussion and shock wave, something Hollywood rarely shows, a shock wave. Even a grenade should create a small shock wave. You want that fast evacuation of air to help propel the shrapnel, which does the real damage, not a bunch of flame and smoke. i have worked as a special effects designer for film and television and many of their explosions, like a car explosion, is actually a lot of flame canons and air canons mounted in the vehicle aimed out every window. The air canons propel pieces of styrofoam and other lightweight materials to simulate shrapnel. There is never an actual boom of an explosion on set. They add the sound in post production. They really just want to see as much bright flame and junk flying around as possible. Now they add the flames in post or enhance them with CGI. Hollywood gives people who have never been in the military a really bad expectation of the real thing. Even when real dynamite or TNT go off, there is little to no flames. All the energy is put into the concussion, not the flames, but all TNT in movies has to create a mushroom cloud of flames and smoke. Any good explosion wants to evacuate all of the air from an area, then have all of that air slam back together to fill the vacuum the explosion caused. That’s the reverse, or implosion, which is just as deadly. One real mistake in Saving Private Ryan has to be the bullets hitting guys underwater with deadly force. Even the Mythbusters proved that the velocity of a bullet is severally slowed once hitting the resistance of the water. The higher the caliber round, the less penetration it had. A .22 caliber round will go deeper into water with deadly force than will a .50 caliber. In fact, the .50 cal rounds disintegrated upon hitting the water’s surface. The force of the round destroyed itself upon meeting the resistance of the water surface. If you’re two feet or more underwater, you’re pretty much safe from any round. A small .22 round may penetrate the water enough to hit you, but it won’t have enough velocity to even pierce the skin, much less do deadly damage like they showed in Saving Private Ryan. It was quite a shame, because so much else of the opening scene they got right, just not those hits underwater and of course, the explosions.

I dont think they will use real nuclear in Wolverine movies for sure.

The only outlier in that will be fuel air explosion I would presu,e

Lmao if u would know Now we in ww3

@@FBI-mb4fb now stop

New Antarctictangle/JoMiMi There’s nothing bad with that

@@FBI-mb4fb ಠ ೧ ಠ

LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

100% real

some of them are falling before he shoots iirc lol

I thought everybody knew that

He did not dare to touch Chuck Norris.

😂

I suppose that means you won't be taking any tips from; 6 DAYS. THE DELTA FORCE. DIE HARD. THE INSIDE MAN. METRO. MUNICH. NAVY SEALS. THE NEGOTIATOR. OPERATION THUNDERBOLT. THE PEACEMAKERS. SPEED. SUDDEN DEATH. SWAT. THE TAKING OF PELHAM 123. THE TERRORISTS. UNDER SIEGE. VICTORY AT ENTEBBE. WHITE HOUSE DOWN. THE WINTER SOLDIER.

@JohnOhkumaThief - have you seen Kajaki? I’m a military veteran and most Hollywood dialogue is utter bollocks (crap). This movie was spot on. The speech, banter and inflections were exactly how British soldiers speak. I discovered later that the actors actually met and conversed with the real guys because this film is based upon true events. To avoid spoiling it - watch it without reading up about it and definitely avoid seeing any trailers. After you see the movie, then think about how the actors were. It might be helpful to you

BHD is one of the more well done “war movies” and yes. The events happened and the movie portrayed them extremely realistically. What Billy is referring to is the more finer details: A 40mm GLA has very little kick. It doesn’t make your rifle bounce up like that. The gold top rounds don’t make flame and flash like that. Just bang and frag. The rappelling and “fast rope” stuff like that? It was done. It’s one of the reasons 2 blackhawks got clipped so easily in a large operation. What Billy is saying is that it’s not done anymore. Certainly not by British or Australian infantry and SF units. That’s what we call a static and stationary infill and it’s extremely high risk. It’s why we use fast moving armoured troop carriers like PMVs/Bushmasters and have air units for overwatch and support but they’re never stationery in an area of operations. The enemy confirmations and such in American Sniper are extremely unrealistic as Billy says and a sniper leaving an over watch position to join a patrol etc. is ridiculous. That movie whilst based on a real person is extremely “Hollywoodised” to make it more cinematic. The only thing I’d argue with is the 7.62 rounds zipping through water in Saving Private Ryan. Ballistic trials have proven its impossible for rounds to move like that in water. In fact the larger the caliber the more inefficient they are when hitting water which is 800% more dense than air and the energy dispersion of the round is extremely rapid. You can still be hit with rounds in shallow water. It’s possible to still be shot in shallow water. But it’s proven that all rounds, even larger rounds from 30mm weapon systems are basically non lethal beyond 30cm of water

@@marks6734 thank you for the response

I'd say 8/10 for a movie, is essentially as good as it can get without it being a straight up documentary

@@jesperasenfors2209 3:26

@@jesperasenfors2209 Yep. 8 out of 10 is maximum an artistic movie can get, because its still a movie.

@Eric Miret he evaluates a particular scene not the whole movie

@@jesperasenfors2209 Agree. There has to be some cinematic (entertainment/theatrics) value to the film, thus it can't ever be true to life.

Oh...what a great idea..."I am Ahmad from the WHA Organization...that's We Hate America...and let's look at our first clip...In this scene, a terrorist is blown up with his own mail bomb when it was returned to him b/c of lack of proper postage....this is unrealistic because everyone knows that when you get a package in the mail without the correct postage and no return address, no one is that stupid to open it up again....well except for this guy...In our second clip, this is also unrealistic, because everyone knows that you are supposed to jump out of your car before ramming it into a building and detonating the explosives in it. Remember, kill the infidels, but save yourself. Now, this scene is correct because the media does downplay terrorist attacks caused by our people...In one instance, the US Secretary of State blamed this video when the US Embassy in Benghazi was attacked and we killed the US Ambassador...It is as if the media is on our side..."

Ummm that’s what this video was

I could imagine an Ex Rehabilitated Terrorist actually doing an reaction on it.

9 terrorists break down 11 terrorist scenes...

All you gotta do is ask all those in charge of military's who use soldiers as pawns and cannon fodder, who make soldiers invade countries over fake information, basically you know who LOL

In fairness he's done is undeniabley incredible, but he wouldn't be aloowed back on camp for being in breach of the secrets act which is not a good thing to do

I've only just discovered these retired SAS operative vids recently - fascinating.. had no idea about the TV shows..

NO Sylvester Stallone can to 😂

@@BushidoRyu refering to the video but yes, Stallone also.

“Literally” people still can’t use the word properly. Retards

@Weedy Lints Except that Davey Crockett was a nuclear recoilless rifle that was fired from the back of a jeep, and has nothing to do with the fake lunchbox rocket launcher pictured here. You're the only one FOS.

Chuck Norris

I was just thinking this

@Eric Miret Why are you sure of this?

@Eric Miret I didn't say that I was sure about anything. What makes you so sure?

@Eric Miret Give it up, Miret.

@Eric Miret The people with the pen are the editors of the paper

Indeed, it is a flamethrower.

And its definitely not a "nuclear" weapon 😂

@@idiotbuster8662 stop spamming the same thing

@@idiotbuster8662 you people are tools, and some age ones at that! Do you think he actually thought the rocket launcher, along with frags, are nuclear?! You must be a yank - no other citizens are that thick they don't get sarcasm 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

... its* use, its* target (it's = it is)

It's a good movie for letting off some steam.

I don't watch it at all lol

I don't think any firefight movie is intended to be realistic. Drama, action and escapism are what they're about.

@@lucylouise4922 I doubt that logic applies to movies like Black Hawk Down, because that movie was based on a real-life event. You think they'd make that and insult the memories of the fallen soldiers by focusing more on drama/action than realism?

@@shaggybaggums These people must not have watched the movie because I can't believe no one else got what you said here, lol...

Master of my fate I’ll see your proposal and raise you a CGI Aslan lion voiced yet again by Liam Neeson. Yes, I went all in.

@@oxide9679 ah I see, you are from Nigerian CGI division I take it

His roar is completely unrealistic

Excellent idea! Maybe he can also review The Ghost and the Darkness while he's at it?

"We would never let a monkey hold our Cubs near the edge of a rock. Completely unrealistic."

also got his pregnant wife stabbed in the gut and killed.

@@lostn65 what?? When did that happened on the show??

@@rockraphlegal I think thats a game of thrones reference

lol

That's why I don't watch these pseudo 'realistic' 🐃💩 shows.

Indeed it was a very intense film and quite realistic. Some people have actually questioned the whole plot of the film, but these 'sole survivor' rescue mission did actually happen. After All of the Sullivan Brothers got killed on a Navy destroyer, they brought in a policy were they would save at least 1 family member to preserve family bloodlines. There's a bit more to it than that, but that's the jist.

At the time, those opening scenes were the most vivid war scenes ever in a film. Now they're more commonplace, but at the time I had never seen such chaos and the "fog of war" as that landing scene, and I have watched many war movies. It was a vast improvement over what came before, cinematically. And yes it was sobering - like being a witness to the real thing.

Samuel L. Jackson reacts to snake movies

Count me in

lmao

*Sharks reacts to baby shark* _Doo-doo-doo baby shark Doo-doo-doo baby shark..._

Did u mean Megashark movie series?

😂😂😂

hahahaha commando .

🤨😂😂😂🤣🤣☠️☠️☠️funniness sh@t I heard all day

You can see the platform launching the guy in the air at 3:38

Sorry, I ruined your 666 likes

@Bill Doster, you are correct. The assault took place in broad daylight. I have read the book "Black Hawk Down" several times. This from Wikipedia "At 15:42, the MH-6 assault Little Birds carrying the Delta operators hit the target,...."

It was a dumb plan

Looks like Arnold had an M202 FLASH

I'm British and here when we say 'you wouldn't' in this context, we generally mean 'you wouldn't want to', especially in the North were this guy is from.

@@pegleg2959 Ahh that makes sense, apologies from the colonies!!

fake taxi

I’m one and I’d volunteer lol

call me a cab.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@leifmanson7599 well at least you didn't try to assassinate a Senator (or MP in your case) 😂

Tbh, that was almost 30 years ago now. Black Hawk is the reason why coming in during broad daylight by helicopter is not done anymore. It's realistic pre 1993. Unrealistic post 1993. Just like how having your infantry march in line was realistic up until the early mid 20th century. But it's unrealistic now.

It's interesting as it shows the difference between British training and US training i.e. unfortunately US training is quite poor in comparison.

@@rsmith6366 I mean it was uncommon even back then, only poorly trained army's would do it like that, as they wouldn't have the capability of performing night time air operations.

@@Alex-cw3rz Except that the only reason they did it during the day is because that’s when the meeting was taking place. You just want to spread your inaccurate claims that the US is poorly trained for some reason.

@@brycewalker3726 It's well known the US army isn't well trained, this isn't a revelation, also even if they had to do it in the day due to the meeting, the way it was executed was exceptionally poor, having to be saved by UN forces is just embarrassing, especially as they are not the best coordinated group ever and that's an understatement.

Made my day

Lol but there was only one Arnold movie so that doesn't make any sense at all as a joke.

that Arnold movie was cringe asf

@@unitedkingdomboi9976 Fact: Commando is one of the greatest movies ever made.

@@CompagnonDeMisere25 Fact: I'm gonna go slit my wrist now

They are both right, honestly. It just depends on the bullet and its velocity entering the water. Supersonic FMJ bullets will tend to quickly fragment upon striking the surface of the water; subsonic bullets aren't subjected to as much shock and can penetrate through water more easily. And there are also AP bullets with steel or tungsten penetrators, where the penetrator would be able to separate from the rest of the bullet and continue through the water at high speed due to their narrow cross-section and much harder and tougher material. There are even some bullets specifically designed to work under water. Given his military experience, I would imagine he saw people shot under water with armour penetrating rounds.

It was figured out through controlled tests that smaller gauge rounds tend to be able to travel further and have a better chance of hitting someone underwater than higher calibre rounds. The larger rounds encounter more resistance in water which greatly shortens the effective lethal range. Those people he saw shot under water we're probably shot with standard 7.62mm rounds (the primary ammo used in M16s and Canadian forces rifles).

@@MGlBlaze Exactly what I was thinking. But I'm not buying the way the bullets travel under water in the scene in 11:47 . Looks like they go in a straight path for multiple meters. I'd like to believe that a bullet loses it's energy somewhere between one and two meters (if not fragmented in the impact). I would love to be proven wrong though. And just to be clear: I'm not doubting that Billy hasn't seen people get shot underwater.

War historian: "No American M4s fought Tiger 1s during WW2". Fat Joe Bingham, who drove an M4 during the War: "We killed 7 tigers in Belgium and 4 King Panthers in Germany! Why, I personal shot 7 SS officers with my 1911 as we were passing by!"

isthatujeebus same here buddy! 🇬🇧

Not a MANPAD, that’s a man portable air defense system like a Stinger

@@RallyRallyRally Thanks bro. Of course you are absolutely right.

I thought that what he meant about "nuclear weapon" was just exaggerated explosions. Like he said about Arnolds grenades only a twenty or so seconds later

@@jokurandomi93 shhhhh they don't understand English sarcasm.

@@PersonalityMalfunction you are correct, that is indeed M202 FLASH. 66mm incendiary rockets.

Hollywood understands grenades just fine, but they used to... still do, can't stand that the visuals are largely unimpressive. Toss one in a door and there's an incredible report, but there's no smoke aside from any dust shaken off the structure when it pipped up a little bit and the windows broke. Hollywood goes "That's all?" ignoring the minced human inside, but it's not all that exciting to watch. Unfortunately they believe in the predominance of people who want flashy over realistic, whether it's because they don't know or don't care.

@@mfree80286 I can personally only name 3 or 4 movies in which grenades are depicted realistically. The Hollywood go-to seems to always include lots of flames, throwing men 20 feet from the blast, no shrapnel, and no disorientation or hearing damage.

@@christopherwilson8230 Because they have to CGI it. The visible effects of a real high explosive are the same things that would be killing the stunt crew for being anywhere near it. Union rules, no 40psi overpressures on live sets....

@@mfree80286 they absolutely have the ability to do realistic grenade explosions with CGI.

@@christopherwilson8230 *now*, but not until the last decade. And it's still not "visually exciting". EDIT: Last couple decades, and it was prohibitively expensive for what was classically a thrifty medium with high return. Let's also not forget that a few of the movies in this list here are moderate to low budget films from 30-60 years ago

It a fiction movies.

Hahaha

Long live wakaliwood

Man,the man is killing us,man!!!

Sure that is how they scam people on the phone, seems legit

@@juandenz2008 why not

Commando is legit. Its real life that isnt realistic.

@@juandenz2008 so what ya saying is ya a millenial snowflake who melts when people say things that upset ya. I watched full metal jacket at 9 yr old back in 1990, because mi mum left the VHS in the player. Guess what served 14yrs in yorkshire regiment british army infantry and currently serving almost and almost at 7yrs in us army infantry.

@@juandenz2008 Don't have any children of my own, but certainly wouldn't like it if my cousins allowed there kids to watch any movie of that nature at such a young age. Common sense tbh!

To be fair arnorld himself is quite unrealistic as an existence . SO this might just be a legit movie lol.

everything just wrong

A priest that been loyal to the first Bible and reviews the new Bible's/testament of every religions and church. Should be a good one.😈😈

Priest: azmodan doesnt actually have nipple piercings. Did these devs even read revelations?

Make it happen.

@Fourcams meh..

8 feet, and their shot was a whole lot closer than any Nazi on D day.

You'll need to watch that episode again. They CONFIRMED the myth, and concluded that most weapons, excluding the 9mm pistol and 12gauge slug they shot vertically, lose all energy within 3 feet of water if shot at a 25 degree angle. The germans are firing a 7.92×57mm MG 42, which most definitely wouldn't kill them that deep under water. SAS guy just isn't aware of this apparently.

@@tatskamaster I would trust the SAS guy over mythbusters

@@andreicecold4379 Personal anecdote vs controlled ish environment.

@@andreicecold4379 I don't trust a personal war fogged anecdote over science. He wouldn't be the first career SOF guy to make up stories or remember them wrong either. Just look up Chris Kyle or Marcus Luttrell for reference lmao. There are countless other sources that prove how ineffective bullets are at entering and traversing through water and maintaining energy through it.

You won the internet today kiddo.

Water isn't wet apparently...

@@69DangerousD it isn't

Wait! Waters wet?

@@69DangerousD Water is not actually wet.

"and that scene right there is complete bullshit" 😂😂

😂

Same bro

"Why are all these aliens humanoid?? You realise most aliens aren't even carbon-based lifeforms, or even visible with the naked eye? I'm one of the rare ones."

Well boys looks like we’ll have to raid Area 51 again

roll out!

"Take out the TAHGETS!!"

Tueaaamm deffmatch

You're the last one, complete the mission

I actually choked on my beetroot juice when I read this comment 💀💀💀

It was like he was fighting Stormtroopers from Star Wars. They can't hit anything.

Indeed! 🤣🤣

Funny thing, Arnies M60 has like 30 bullets in the belt and they never decrease in numbers. He must have pushed some unlimited ammo code or something.

He's a cheater 🤣 SV_GOD1 SV_INFINITE_AMMO2

@@toemblem actually they can. the reason that the stormtroopers didn't hit the main characters was because vader ordered them not to.

Wasn't visible in the VHS and I know because I'm that old 😭

"let off some steam Bennett"

Reverse Uno card

UKposts call of duty fanboys breakdown real SAS mission. 😂 It's pretty much what is happening on here with some of the comments. Hahaha

@@overthewebb lol. Yeah😂

"Yeah that grenade was pretty cool but could've used a much bigger explosion with a bit of fire"

"he should've turned his back to the explosion so he could look more cooler"

Grenade launchers aren't really small arms.

The Crimson Fucker I’m sorry you must be right, please explain your military background to us though just so we know you know what you’re talking about.

@@Ethan-km4lx "Small arms" is the category that describes personal firearms and light machine-guns. Man-portable explosive ordinance, of which grenade launchers are, falls under the category of "light weapons". Under-barrel grenade launchers are specifically listed by the UN as "light weapons". Different nations might have some divergence in categorization but these are generally accepted conventions. Source: International Instrument to Enable States to Identify and Trace, in a Timely and Reliable Manner, Illicit Small Arms and Light Weapons; Page 3, Paragraph 3.

👍

@@Criomorph Are you seriously arguing that with an ex SAS soldier?!.. I mean what does he know?.. Man I love youtube comments! Hahaha

He was right from the military point of view though; I'm ex military myself, although nothing as good as this guy and I was amazed watching Black hawk down first time - I've read about, so I knew it WAS what happened

He’s criticising the way they’ve done the operation basically saying it was stupid

However, it was really there only option because it’s was a target location

@@NWO2023 Yeah but this video is "How real is it?", not a professional criticism of actual occurrences. Sadly, that stupid decision was very real, and good men paid with their lives

Apophis392 modern warfare

Monkee Cheese Really?

I hold the record of 15.63 seconds

Yeah his accent pretty reminded me of Price

Climb the lader if you want another go.

Very realistic = 9/10 SUPER realistic = 10/10

@@chacondetunaerma Real life = 11/10

Pretty means it looks good?

@@TheBatmansbrother Pretty in this context means 'reasonably'.

The guy has seen people get shot under water, so he has seen the impossible. Thats alot of things seen.

There is a channel called REDCELL with ROK UDT/SEALs doing just that.

@@MrDK0010 I think theres a bit of a difference between how SEALs and SAS Clear buildings, unsure but due to different country and branch they'd obviously have some little differences

@@KageRuffian yep youre right. Although the mission was pretty cool they made a lot of mistakes in the house clearing in my eyes.

@Mattchew UK I just wanted to confirm that every military has similar but not the same tactics sense of cleaning house e.g. I am not saying their stuff was wrong but lemme name a fww examples that just come to mind: When going up the stairs one person focuses always to the right, so you always got one person that looks at the newest angle, opening it up all the way. The other looks straight up. In the mission it wasnt always done. When cleaning houses you dont wanna stick together like they did, you only got two people on the stairs at once until theyre at top but you dont lose view contact (one of the rules of house clearing) When moving along a corridor you always have your back covered and not turn your back to a potentially dangerous angle like the guy did who got shot. You coulda made a pass there, which is the front person looking at the door, then quickly moving to the other side of the door but always facing it to secure it while the guy from the back tags along with you and secures the stairs whilst a third person secures the door from the other side. The problem is that the perfect mission doesnt exist. The mission in the game is executed well and professionally but mistakes are always made and heck I couldnt have done it as well because I got less experience. The game scene is pretty realistic although I dont get why the characters were always so close together in the scenes. Not very navy seal like from what Ive seen from their training in videos.

@Mattchew UK Yeah well I can just tell you how I learned it. Then again we dont know what goes one in the background. They can always say the game was made with Navy Seals but in the end just receive tips from them and the rest they do themselves. Also I wish we had a bigger budget, I want those panoramic nvgs :D

Haven't seen the series but people keep telling me how great it is...guess it'll be my new binge fest

Davies Davies really worth the watch.

Im sorry this guy refused to see the facts behind why he did what he did in that series. If i remember correctly he engaged the building to get the sniper after reinforcements arrived.

@@Stormshock5 And that isn't a bodyguard's job.

He actually got on top of her in that car to protect her but we weren't shown that scene. He also didn't leave her alone, the rest of the bodyguards showed up to protect her before he left.

Doctor Kekkles that is Arnold Schwarzenegger he can do anything

And nuclear grenade 🤣😂

your dyin is fake

Doctor Kekkles it’s a m202 flash lol not a nuclear weapon lol 😂

PYRO C98 tell that to the the guy i quoted from the video lol

Hahahahaha

EXACTLY PLEASE DO 🤣🤣🤣he just fired a nuclear weapon off his shoulder 😳😑🙄😭😭😭😭☠️☠️

Commando is a joke movie but i will want to see it

Getting an entire trolley filled with weapons after casually breaking in, no alarms going off and greeted by a couple of cops rather than a heavy armed response unit.

Everything Wrong With Commando: Mark Billingham Edition

He probably has PTSD, bullets don't hurt under water

@@whatisyoudoing1187 If there is one thing about PTSD, they have a pretty accurate recall of combat situations they've been in, especially when other people are shooting at them.

@@sixshooter500 fairy tales PTSD same as schizophrenia all imagination

@@sixshooter500 He doesn't look like he has PTSD, which is quite worrying TBH...

@@whatisyoudoing1187 are you having a laugh?

John Doe Naw man, it’s gotta be Killer Bean.

Nah. Tropic Thunder is more realistic

you mean Hot Fuzz?

Hot Shots was actually a documentary!

Delta Farce

@Not Mike H That's fair.

andrew evolution Crash Bandicoot

Mikey crash 😍

"RPG on the rooftop!"

Or "Enemy AC-130 above"

nobody will say it as well as craig fairbass (gaz/ghost)

👌👌👌😁😁😁😁🤣🤣

I’ll be on top of you, I’m gay asf darling. 💋👅

@@mdkcjtl5523 james charles: *incoming call*

@@mdkcjtl5523 buttholes are only for exit.

@@mdkcjtl5523 stfu, go to james charles them marry

Well said. That's why I enjoy his action movies, expecting realism from them would be missing the point. Three of the cast members of Predator were actually in the military(Arnold served in the Austrian Army for one year) and one of them(Jesse Ventura) even said that with the early scene in the movie(before they encounter the Predator) when Arnie and his men attack a guerilla fighter base, if it were real life, they would all be dead.

It's his presence and charisma that make most of his movies great. It's like seeing the coolest uncle ever, showup and take you on a adventure

@@philster611-ih8te year not week

@@idurisu930 he spent a year in the Military, a week in confinement.

@Hentai is an Art There's still two sides to the coin.

"That would'v never happened" "Thats unrealistic" "He shouldn't have done that" 6/10

@@tomatootamot Yeah that's the other I wanted to point out but I was just lazy honestly.

I'd give this video 2/10 helmets. Their supposed expert dismissed several things documented as actually happening as being "unrealistic".

Yeah, this SAS guy is lame tbh

EnglishXnXproud Of course it’s not. It’s the scale of realism in a movie/show. If that’s your criteria 10 is literally impossible, and should not be a part of the scale. Fucko

still, one of my favorites movies when I was a kid.

@@AngelLestat2 I still enjoy. The whole point of the film is that it doesn't take things seriously.

You mean you can't just throw a pipe through a guy?

@@TheDrNinjaman through a guy and the steam tank behind XD It is possible if you are Arnold :P

@@TheDrNinjaman I guess you could if the other guy needs to let out some steam.

If you see that explosion and stop, you will see something that makes the right guy flying.

Funny cause in the 50s the Marines wanted nuclear grenades

It's called a M202A1 - odd that he doesn't know what it is.

@dizy same but he's British so could of not seen in action

am i the only person that saw the catapult thing make the right guy fly into the air

Bren39 : 🤣🤣🤣 i need 1-3 hrs to find movies to watch. I need this guy recommended list for sure

This guy would be no fun too watch a movie with

I'd actually like to see what he has to say about shows. Me and my buddies used to tear apart movies we watched together as teenagers (one of my friends worked at a place like blockbuster, we got to see everything days before it was released in the store), then write reviews for the store under pen names and the store would post them on a board for people to read. There was one veteran soldier who talked to us one day in the store. He started talking to us about our review on Gran Torino and how we didn't know shit about retired soldiers. We admitted we didn't, and he gave us a calm and gathered earful about how we wrote our reviews. We liked this ol' vet so much, we included him in our group. He broke down everything for us and didn't ruin any movies, just clarified the reality of what we were entertained by. Gave us all a new perspective, and one of our group ended up working for a local paper because of his reviews. Every single person has different knowledge, and it's nice to see when people open your eyes to get rid of your ignorance towards dramatization in films.

Ain’t nothing that Shrek can do

Yeah my dad does this bullshit lmao, ruins literally every movie (that's not realistic) ( that's not what would happen).....yeah we know it's called a movie 🤦

ikr platoon was called the most realistic war movie of its time.

They shouldve put sicario too.

Or 12 strong.

And jarhead

idk about platoon but full metal jacket is very american and he's SAS

In some respects. In other aspects it's not realistic (beach wasn't that short, more ships were involved, beach obstacles facing wrong way etc).

"Nuclear weapon from his shoulder"

What does he know? He's not even a real soldier. Real soldiers come from America

@@curleypubes3672 wow, you're a really good comedian

@@curleypubes3672 real soldiers fought for they country with honor, doesn't matter where they came from, u fuckin donkey.

@@curleypubes3672 Is that why you lot need the British army to hold your hand. The SAS make you SF's look shite.

Also, it's not even an anti-personnel weapon. (or a "nuclear weapon" like he put it jokingly). It's actually designed to launch incendiary rockets to destroy foliage or wooden structures.

Basically, it was built mostly for rural/jungle warfare?

@@zacksilverstone7642 Meant for stuff like 'Nam.

DangerIncFilms well done. Gun nerd approved.

@@zephramcochrane-gillies3641 Naw, it is an anti-personnel weapon, it's _primarily_ designed for assaulting structures because it was designed to replace flamethrowers, but it's not like it's going to bounce off infantry if you use it on them.

He's obviously dressed them up as one another in order to confuse any potential assailant.

well they're not called Brangelina for nothing

Jennifer aniston suddenly gets pissed

Brangelina Pitt. That's why 😅

Coincidence? - i dont Think so

Get plenty of nappies ready then!

8 out of 10

'Totally unrealistic'

@@steveeveryman7623 nappies?

They will shit themselves or barf

SAS are the best in the world (literally) there’s got to be something wrong

Moritz P. Yeah

@Moritz P. yeah

@ApostleOfWonka It was the specific scenes which were being rated not the films overall.

True... you can't get many of these guys in front of a camera and when they get them, they ignore the answers... Bless him!!!

X 3 R 0 he sounds nothing like that

I never noticed that before until seeing this video.

It's like a board 😂

Hahahaha nono it was the nade xD

I just noticed that and I started scrolling to see if anyone else noticed.

Here before 1k likes