Shut the fuck to please, it’s the most unoriginal comment ever

@@olindevos i was gonna type the exact same thing (up instead of to). tired of these idiots.

And who the fuck will give a like on this comment motherfuckers

Yo I'm getting so much hate lol. Didn't really think people who actually start hating for saying this. It's not that deep. And it is true as well🤣😂

@@olindevos uh... okay. It's not wrong to do it but I'm just stating facts aren't I

Sorry to hear that amigo. Did they ever find anything of her? Or is she one of the 1109 people that are still "missing"?

@@Flupmeister1 she was identified through DNA 11 months later. Still miss her terribly.

Kurt Dietrich feels bad man hope you get better

Sorry for your loss...

Ah man, I’m so sorry. At least it was a quick death may she rest in piece and her memory never forgotten as with the many who lost their lives or were injured during the attack.

Based on a couple of witnesses that were near the buildings after the first plane hit, there were body parts littered around the grounds. They go into a little bit of detail about it in the Nat Geo docuseries on 9/11. It sounds to me like the wings sent a lot of people flying, many in pieces, down to the ground from the upper floors. I would've much rather have gone instantly on impact than be stuck above or around the impact site(s).

Imagine the ones sitting close to the windows and seeing the planes right before impact.

@@BryanClark-gk6ie - There was the one story of a young woman, just got to work, did a pregnancy test, it was positive. She was at her desk in the North Tower, telling her husband the good news over the phone. She must have seen the plane barreling toward her, screamed OMG, and the line went dead. Sickening. Her name was Patricia A. Massari age 25. She worked for Marsh & McLennan on the 98th floor of the North Tower.

I composed music for this, premiered yesterday

There are videos of people who God only knows survived the impact zone, standing on the very edge of the torn and mangled building with fire all around them...some where till it collapsed, so sad for families who identified there loved one by the clothes worn & seen on the images

This hit a bit too close to home haha (2:01 AM here)

wtf, it's 2.27am as I read this.

hahaha

4:15 am on a Monday as I type this. Missed it by a couple hours my bad

2:05 am hahaha

​@@onumahobart8832 go home you are drunk

Y’all trippin, this is the best of the best technology of the time they couldn’t fake it

Except this is to fool you into believing the lies.

True

@@evangeffner1194 We know 9/11 was an inside job now, so they must indoctrinate the next generation.

*Bla bla bla*

bullshit

Mad that everyone’s got some kind of spin on a story that they were meant to be there and something magically kept them from going. Also, if you were there, as in in New York, what were you watching on TV in your hotel for? Surely you could have just looked outside?

@@thomas-thequestionableseri1095 Have you ever been to NYC? Yeah, you can’t see the WTC from everywhere in the city.

The amount of people saying something like this is just unbelievable, literally

Marsh got hit hard that day. RIP to your brother John. 🌹

Why are these kids in the classroom with bush singing PLANE MUST HIT STEEL ? Coincidence? Rip Al the victim’s ❤️

Well if you want revenge. Know who the perpetrators are. For a critically thinking individual This should be enough evidence to prove beyond a doubt that SATANIC ( 33RD DEGREE ) MASONIC/ILLUMINATI. CONTROL OUR GOVERNMENTS AND THE WORLD. They are Corrupt, evil and very, very Symbolic. Our entire history was literally manufactured. You can fake alot of things but dates of large documented events proves very difficult. Like we should all be able to agree that the TWIN TOWERS fell on 9/11/2001 correct? So I don't expect anyone to just believe anything I say . MY HOPE IS THAT EVERYONE WOULD DO THEIR OWN RESEARCH AND TRY TO PROVE THE INFORMATION WRONG. This is just a small example OF 33RD degree symbolism. ⬇️ .................................... One big MASONIC symbol is the square and compass flanked by Pillars, representing the Roman numerals IXXI wich is 911. The US emergency #911 was adopted in 1968. 1968+33=2001 The WTC broke ground in 1968. And fell 33YRS later in 2001. The OWNER of the WTC complex was David Rockefeller. He was on the cover of Newsweek on 4/3/1967. 43🔄34+1967=2001. In the picture he was Overlooking NYC at the future sight of the TWIN TOWERS. The hands on his watch were at 9 and 11. The Pentagon broke ground on 9/11/1941 and was Nicknamed ground zero. Exactly 60yrs later both locations were hit. And the N.name was transferred to the site of the WTC. The first president to publicly mention the coming of the NEW WORLD ORDER was George Bush sr in a speech on 9/11/1990 exactly 11 before the TWIN TOWERS fell. The USS NEW YORK was built with Recycled steel from the WTC. The original USS NEW YORK was commissioned on 9/11/1911 and was Decommissioned in a supposed nuclear test. The ILLUMINATI was supposedly founded in 1776. The ONE WORLD TRADE CENTER that replaced the TWIN TOWERS is 1,776ft tall earning it the N.name freedom tower. THE observation deck is on the 68th floor. 6+3=9 8+3=11 1968 BBC short film called NEWS BENDERS. media lies creates news 5 years in advance to scare the masses to sway public opinion and move money faster. (Good watch) 30 min . WW1 Start Date: 07/28/1914 07+28+19+14= 68. WW2 Start Date: 09/01/1939 09+01+19+39= 68. RUSS/UKRAINE aka WW3 Start Date: 02/24/2022 02+24+20+22= 68. 6 + 3=9 8 + 3=11 The MAYAN CALENDAR ended on 12/21/2012 according to the gregorian calendar that we currently use. we didn't start using until the mid 1500s. If you use the ETHIOPIAN CALENDAR that is much OLDER and also mentioned in the bible multiple times. It changes the Mayan end date to 12/31/2019. The day NIH declared C-19 a pandemic. also NEW YEARS EVE 2020. hindsight is 20/20 is reference to year and clear vision. ETHIOPIAN NEW YEARS DAY is not 01/01...its 9/11. Revelation 9:11 Is about ABADDON/ APOLLION the angel of the Bottomless pit. Look up pics Depicting ABADDON /APOLLION. Look up( IS TRUMP APOLLION) You'll find a book titled TRUMP, ABADDON AND OBAMA. Suggesting that Trump is ABADDON sent to defeat satans Army. suggesting that Obama is SATAN. I know it sounds batshit crazy. BUT? There are photos of Obama dressed as SATAN and nobody else is in costume. The cover of the Economist magazine 12/22/2012 was a cartoon Depicting the 7 Deadly sins. Bankers are on a train labeled greed. Obama is in a rowboat labeled pride. Wich was satans sin. if you spell Obama's daughter's names backwards Take out the word ALAH it spells I AM SATAN. AILAM AHSATAN MALIA NATASHA There is a video clip of Netanyahu with Obama. Netanyahu refers to Obama as big Satan and Israel as little Satan. Luke 10:18 kjv I saw SATAN fall from heaven like lightning..... ( Lightning, Fall from high ) Hebrew translation Barac bama. A FESTIVAL in Italy called CARNIVAL de VIAREGIO. Has 150FT Trump float dressed as ABADDON. NO OPINIONS All facts. You can decide what it all means. But in my opinion if you believe it means nothing. Then you're brainwashed AF. If you have anything to add or you think I got something wrong please feel free to comment 🙏☮❤✝️🌐

ikr

It's the 20th anniversary, so there will be a lot of interest, producing more ad revenue.

i was not even 1 when this was made, mad

Hey the same people behind covid did 911

Didn't look at the date until I saw this comment lol, I was gonna say what's with the terrible physics with minecraft graphics? Now it makes sense. Would be nice if this was remade now.

Ik, how far we have come hey

I remember when there were no buildings

I didn't even realize it changed, I thought Google earth still looks like this.

We’re all nerds confirmed

@@DamienAlexander ah I think these days they just use scans of buildings like in Google Maps.

yep that 2000 ton Hat Truss on the roof was designed to take care of that exterior lattice and 100 floors in the event of a wild strike

funniest thing: aircraft was not even shaked while hitting the steel wall, not slowed down, nothing bent, cracked or broke away, just sliding in as if it is a computer animation is, same like this video.

@@user-jq7tc7qi5z John Lear was all over this state produced nonsense back in Jan 2008. Read his posted affidavit.

Imagine having a window view.

There’s one guy I heard somewhere that watched the plane come directly at him and he was under the wing that was higher and survived. I think he still might be alive.

Omg I could only imagine how terrify all the workers in that building had suffered. It just so sad and all these people didn’t have to die like this.

@@tiagodembo7488 alive and lying.

@@princesselani340 yes, if only they hadn't been political hostages of the u.s. gov't which at that time was controlled at a certain level by the neocons. But they didn't make it happen. The real power on this planet doesn't permit doofuses like them to have direct access to the real technology. The people who brought the buildings down were the same people who wanted to bring them down legally and were refused the right to do a controlled demolition. In order to not pay so much as it would have cost to disassemble the buildings, they blew them up with unknown technology. Let them give a signal to others in other countries that they have this technology, and let them remove all of our pseudo freedoms that we thought we had. Two stones with one bird.

LOL. You're not the only one who's had that thought.

even living in 15 floor apartement i will prepare it, due unpredrict earthquake can be happen amytime

You probably would be better off with something like a hang glider type of device rather than a parachute. At just fifteen stories, a parachute would probably not have enough time to deploy properly and do much to slow you down. Just a thought.

Agree tawnku! Rope another options, but it has possibility some people may use it too

Helot Djut LOL...true. Yet, would you deny others a chance to be able to escape? I don't think you are that type of person. You seem to be a person that truly understands the value of all life.

My mom is have 13 years old with is passed this tragedy

This is a cartoon. Do more research.

@@greatbriton8425 "This is a cartoon. Do more research." This is a physically accurate analysis of the events. Do even a tiny bit of research.

@@rodshop5897 🤣🤣🤣

@@rodshop5897 You don't even understand basic physics. How??

There were just explosions, no planes

On a building that was engineered to withstand a direct hit from aircraft, at that. And then not a trace found afterwards, other than random parts from aircraft not matching the purported aircraft in question. Then there's WTC 7, that just fell inside of itself...

I don’t know if this simulation took into account the explosives plated in the building.

@@dylandavidson1709 I mean, it's an easy thing to miss.

@@livestock9722 yeah...not too much to care about

I know right

I know

@@richarda1568 i know

indeed

Give them time, they have to wait several decades before they ever do anything else that involves the gubmint murdering AmeriKKKan citizens to start another war. This was worse than Pearl Harbor where they watched people die at the hands of a foreign nation to jump into a war, this time they actually murdered their own people to jump into a war that wasn't even connected to the people they said committed the act, LOLZ.

I'm more like Imagining that day. What it was like on that plane. Remembering Watching these planes hit the towers on tv and everyone scared and confusing. I went to work but no one did any work. We were glued to the tvs. America was under attack and wondered what planes have terrorist on them and what are they hitting next? The most disturbing part was when you could see people committing suicide before the building collapsed and thinking what would I have done?

It would look like Real Life.... So was 14 years ago actually nothing more than a computer game created 28 years in the future?

@@GunnerRDS ah yes i also think modern games are indistinguishable from reality 🤦‍♀️

Its a simplified physics model. It could have looked way better allready back than.

60fps

it's counterintuitive but that's how it was, ie: foam can cut a hole through a thick high durability carbon fiber panel at the right speed, it took real tests to convince many NASA engineers that it was a thing. When you think of foam, you think anything but it being something so strong to go through one of the strongest materials. Momentum changes things drastically, in the end it's all about energy vs time distributing through materials.

funniest thing: aircraft was not even shakes while hitting the steel wall, not slowed down, nothing bent, cracked or broke away, just sliding in as if it a computer animation is, same like this video. and this means government of USA was involved and is guilty

Sorry I have to disagree with you, planes are not built to be strong they are built to be lightweight

@@jimmoravec1326 you “disagree,” eh? I guess that means the factual information means nothing.

@@Moakmeister What are you basing your facts on ?

@@jimmoravec1326 the engineers who built the planes? Lol

@@Moakmeister They built the planes stronger than steel and concrete ? Oh yes I forgot they are magic planes, never mind

Me also 1993😅

@@anandjiya same 50 miles north of the City sitting in my 3rd grade classroom

94 from California. This day will not be forgotten

I’m a former New Yorker, I worked on Wall St. when they were being built. I was 53 when they collapsed, in court, sentencing a murderer to prison. I will never forget that day. Our family lost several people, three were relatives, the rest were friends. It still feels like it happened yesterday.

@@mchapman132 Wow.

same

Desert Gecko yup

9/16

same... creepy YT tryna take attention away froom Hunter Biden stuff

Building 7 mr pullit egh!.

feels more like last week

In a tornado, a paper straw was found impaled in an oak tree. With speed, velocity, momentum, it is possible. Physics.

consider the fact a boeing 767 can travel between 500-600mph. this video helps show what happens to a skyscraper when something that size going that speed crashes into it. regardless of conspiracies of who was actually behind the attack, the planes flying into the buildings are what destroyed them

At the speed they pretend an airplane hit, the wings would first be torn from the body at sea level air density. And second when an object moves above 400 mph hits a solid object it atomizes and turns to dust. The image of the building so perfectly done was created with explosives. It even shows the shape of the engines. It's more like a cartoon than reality.

@@SVRANDGLD - Go back in your mother’s basement, you sound idiotic.

And yet ... they did !

The "high quality" doesn't refer to high definition. Rather, it refers to the detail and accuracy to the physical effects of the crash. They could easily take that same rendering and reanimate it in higher resolution using newer technology.

240p was the upper limit for YT in 2007. True dat.

Welcome to 2007

Bruh it was made in 2007 💀

Trash Millenial Outing

the very same day there was a simulation of exactly the sort of attack which actually happened. The only difference between the simulation and the attack was that the simulation invoked (fake) airplanes. The attack had no airplanes. Only the belief of airplanes. Because 99% of americans believe the TV more completely than they believe their own senses.

@@lebergerdesphotons4565 hold on you don’t believe they were planes?

@@lebergerdesphotons4565 and as for the people in New York who used their visual senses to watch the horrifying scene of a pair of planes hitting two of the most iconic buildings on the planet?

@@NaenaeGaming show me their statements. I don't believe it happened that way and that looking at their statements will show that to be the case. send me a link.

@@lebergerdesphotons4565 there are literally videos of the planes crashing into the towers.

Water jet cutter. Explain.

The simulation doesn't claim the beams were cut. It was programmed to delete the beams once they reached a set amount of damage. It gives the impression they were cut when they might only have been significantly bent. Recently there was a crash in Lima Peru. Two fire trucks pulled onto the runway as a plane was taking off. You can probably find it on youtube. The plane was around rotation speed and so travelling over 150 miles per hour. Find that video and look at the condition of the trucks. This isn't the same as steel beams but the point is to think about momentum. He was traveling at 300+ miles per hour.

@@timshea4279 The abrasive substance.

I thought much the same but I struggle to get any more information. Can you explain more of what you mean as to the result please. thanks

@@ellebarratt5522 These buildings were engineered to withstand this exact scenario.

​@@lovesilk1WTC engineer told they expected an airplane impact but not with full speed

Absolutely correct. It's simple physics that people don't get....How the 'phantom' jet was projected? Lord knows!

Building 7 fell at free fall acceleration through the path of greatest resistance and was not hit by an aeroplane . Newton's 3rd law of motion apparently took the day off. Obvious controlled demolition.

+bass man why do you copy and paste truther bullshit word for word? are you too fucked up to say shit in your own words?

+bass man well said.

If truthers are scum? What are liars? Fox News? World Trade Center building fell at the rate of gravity. Then NIST tried to deny it. When they were unable to deny it, they simply said that "they would go back to the drawing board on it" . Now, does that mean that they are compliant in the cover-up conspiracy? Let me put it this way. If we woke up in the morning and I was the supreme leader of the world., I would have every member of NIST and their ebntire extended families flown to GITMO. And one by one we would find out everything they know. If they denied the acceleration rate of gravity (and they did) then he'll yes they are in on it. Give me the power to subpoena and to grant immunity and some reward money and I'll bring you the heads of everybody who was in on 911. I'll bet my own head that I won't have a single Arab high jacked in the damn mix anywhere. Then I'd start with the media. And Fox News, including the janitorial staff. Isn't that excessive? Did you see those people jumping from the towers? Nothing is excessive. But, under my plan , not one innocent person would be harmed in any way. But I'd get every one of the guilty

Angela Leggerio Debris was falling faster than the collapse at the speed of gravity dumb dipshit sheep. Wake up.

i totally agree with yr synopsis , i think of it this way - lets just say it was the building that was moving @ 500 mph , and the building hits a stationary plain , obviously the building would demolish the far less superior airoplain !! do u live in america friend ??

This shit must have been a fucking bitch to render/simulate.

We? You mean scientists cause they ain't a damn thing 99% of people have done to better science. This is like taking credit for something you didn't do.

Only thing...it isn't and it wasn't, not even back then, those are false statements.

@@midsizesedan7620 Maybe take a trip south of the wall and touch some grass :]

@@midsizesedan7620 scientists don't make these , they have 3D artists and programmers make sims But ig scientists provide the math for realistic physics

Simple answer: speed

A magnum handgun bullet can go through a brick wall . Kinetic energy

​@@user-yp7rn6tb2ta magnum handgun bullet is not made out of aluminum

They were not "massive", they were 4in on the lower floors and 0.25in on the higher ones

@@Nairolf7 Injected or smoked?

considering it was just 9/11, its not that alarming. Makes sense really

ikr??

Que es el "trazado de rayos"?

raytracing is nothing new. It was used in the 90s

@@mw00295 right but it hasn’t been rendered in real time on consumer hardware until just recently. Prior to 2018 it was not a selling point of gpus, just a rendering method that otherwise took several machines, and days to render out.

@@mw00295 Ray tracing was first described in the first half of the 16th century, and first accomplished on a computer in the late 1960s.

@@MealsMedia the video you just watched was most likely not rendered in real time, with each frame taking minutes or even hours to render. Ray tracing has been used in 3d animated movies since their inception. It's not a new technology, and modern games still cheat a lot with Ray tracing, as most of them aren't rendered using full ray tracing (e.g. Global lighting), and only smaller things like mirror reflections are actually Ray traced.

Yeah, because jet airplanes are built entirely from aluminum... :D

@@MrKredski A Boeing 767 is made primarily of Aluminium and composite materials.

Speed = kinetic energy

@@Nobodyelsehasthishandle - all the internal structure as well?

@@MrKredski except the landing gear, yes. Do your research.

Blame our government they did this to us

🤣🤣👍🏻

Sadly those people prolly had the most painless experience that day compared to the rest of floors above.

And the gutless pigs who took all those innocent people's lives rot in hell.

They were spared the pain, and fear. RIP

Amazingly a few survived the impact in tower 2. Absolutely amazing and terrifying story. It's in the new doc on hulu/national geographic.

One story was a young wife went to work, purchased a pregnancy test on the way, took the test….it was positive. She was by the window in her office in the tower, on the phone with her elated husband, telling him they were going to be parents……..in seconds she screamed…..he could hear the loud roar of a plane drown out the call and then nothing. Heartbreaking.

Can’t imagine how the real experience would’ve been. Being 1,000ft up, next to a burning inferno. When you’re in that position, the last thing you would think about is the scientific process of the impact.

It's sad to know whoever was above the plane crash were stuck & unable to get down :(

Inside

@@alexramirez5862 There were no planes Alex.

@@onumahobart8832 no there weren't. But the worst of it is that nobody seems to realize that this was a planned attack by the people who have owned the u.s. gov't and every other gov't on earth with the objective of using fear to gain more control over us all. If we would all understand that, we could put an end to it. But the masses don't want to think about it. They don't want to get involved in their own destiny. We are in the process of being wiped out. The only ones likely to survive will be the ones most ready to accept their slavery. It's a sad commentary on the quality of the human soul.

@pippa3150, Apparently you did, or at least all New Yorkers did, years later they actually selected a Muslim, and turned tail and ran leaving billions in weapons to the enemy. Do you even know who the enemy was? Why did we attack two countries that had nothing to do with 9-11, so yes you forgot everything. Maybe you didn't even know to begin with what the real truth is. You should stop watching the criminal media for starters.

@@faithismespeaks6848 Islam didn’t commit 9/11. Terrorists did.

Vietnam or Iraq will never forget you're crimes against their humanity.

@@WiseFidelista, At least you get it, most sheeple still don't get it after we attacked 2 countries that had nothing to do with 9-11.

The 19th anniversary is next week so that's probably why.

Sterling Gaddis so you never forget

@@jeyDsixx18 this better not happen again damnit

Oh God

Because pentagon partnered with google and wants people to stop believing that they did 9/11, by showing us these "simulations".

yeah its crazy like, yoou know you cant run you just watch the plane and it either obliterates you or push you out the other side of the tower

it is terrible... except that there were no planes! It is one big lie. There were just explosions!

shut up you idiot

People disintegrated so fast and the heat was so much that pain wouldn't occur

Delusional...now you know what being delusional means...or do you? Of course not, when delusional it's you against the world.

Dude the plane is going 200-400 mph when it hits a bird the birds at least going 2-7 mph it’s going super slow of course it’s gonna dent the plane it’s basically the same thing here do you think at all?

The plane weighed close to 150 tons. What don't you understand?

This does not show at all what happened. Where are the explosions? Not the one from the plane, but the one around the building? Why is this a pro explanation video when REAL scientist say that both thos buildings could have withhold 13 planes each. This was all done from inside.

tower 7

@TrueHelp7 already debunked. Why don't you mention the zombies or the lasers?

@@vyros.3234 Meanwhile there are thousands of independent engineers who disagree with the, what was it, a 12 person panel's opinion? Tower 7, which was over 50 stories tall could not have collapsed at those speeds or in that direction under that form of damage. There was minimum fire, the object didn't penetrate that far, and right before it collapsed, you can see flashes of light and the windows popping in a straight line near a structural location on a corner. Their official opinion was "tower 7 collapsed because of fires" -Shyam Sunders which is the guy youre probably referring to in one shape or form. Here is the thing. No jet fuel, and its the first time before or since a metal high rise has ever collapsed from fire. EVER. There have been buildings built half as well burn for over a month and were still standing. Tower 7 was the facility that housed the backup data for government debt. It was destroyed the day after the pentagon stated they couldn't account for 2 trillion dollars. Coincidentally the part of the pentagon that collapsed was the other location that data was stored. There were far too many coincidences during 9/11. Such as the plane that was crashed into a field is the only time weve ever in aviation history that there was nearly zero discernable pieces of the plane or bodies. It's not like we havent had similar if not exact same planes land nose first with more left over. And I never saw anyone like Alex Jones going to court for talking about it, because the government doesn't want to have to defend the evidence. I can tell you haven't invested any real time into it all. Cheers.

@@vyros.3234 ignore him, just another one of those again

da foocha they had ray tracing and everything.

Not really, full of physics violations like all the airplane parts being indestructible after breaching the wall, and never slowing down even when hitting other objects, and even no gravity! So Purdue violates the conservation of energy, equal and opposite forces, and even that gravity exists, with parts floating UP at the end and traveling a straight line without arcing towards the Earth. The Bugs Bunny Road Runner show was more accurate. p.s. As a bonus, some parts just vanish when hit, violating that matter can't be destroyed.....

@@anthonywilliams7052 how are you dealing with being in a world where most people are either stupid or refuse to believe their own eyes and ears? I'm finding it stressful.

​@@lebergerdesphotons4565 It isn't fun sometimes but I've found that more and more people are paying more attention and more open-minded in general than 5 or 10 years ago. Also, many more people fighting back, exposing the craziness all over. That goes for 9/11 and the craziness going on in the world now. More and more people are finally speaking up. Don't let the media convince you otherwise. Better yet, don't watch any TV. I go to thrift stores sometimes and talk to other people, mention the crazy things in the media and almost always several other people will speak up. Be the first to say things and watch how fast people speak up and see there are many people that feel just like we do. We just need to organize, protest, expose the other side every way possible. Use their tactics against them like calling their financers and ask if they support things like the 173 segregated college or rheysyst things taught there now. Many new media or more popular media too like Epoch Times too. The far-left is only about 8% but they are taught to be very active and get a lot of financing and paid protesters too. We just need to organize and fight back as much as possible now so it doesn't turn into a Sivel Wore as they want. Support for the left is at record lows now, if not for hacked machines very few would be in office. Check out a channel Salty Cra---cker too (no dashes), see him here and better yet on Ody___see where many channels are moving since there isn't sen so ring. He's pretty funny and you can see where people are fighting back. Like one of my favorite movies said, "never give up, never surrender". p.s. Check the plane's seating charts and the number of passengers, what are the chances most of the planes would barely be about 25% full when they bumped people from planes to keep them at 100%? Search for "911 research seating charts" and see what I mean. I mostly stick to the numbers since they are easier to prove.

@@anthonywilliams7052 well anthony, I sure hope that there are lots more like you out there. I haven't owned a television for 13 years (since the divorce). I noticed one thing which seems important to keep in mind. There is a theory that suggests that there are inanimate, non-alive microscopic particles so small that you have to have a very expensive machine to even have a shadowy image of them. The theory goes on further to suggest that when nobody's looking these not alive particles penetrate the membranes of living cells and take over their reproductive systems and reprogram them temporarily to use them for their own purposes. Has this theory ever been substantiated? I've looked. I'd say somebody would have had to create an experiment which cleverly demonstrates that this is a true fact. The person or persons who'd have managed this would surely have accumulated a nobel prize or two and we'd all know their names. But I can't find any such experiment. So I have to conclude that there is no proof that any virus exists which has these capacities. Since there is no proof of that, I have to conclude that alternative theories are just as valuable. That perhaps particles that look like that are actually molecular debris from our own dying cells or the cells of any of thousands of species of colleague bacteria that my have died in our bodies. The envelope they talk about may be our own cells work. Perhaps our own cells do the equivalent of putting certain debris in a plastic bag of their own creation because it will be easier than breaking this debris down further. Why not? There's no proof of the other theory. So based on some unproven theory, the pharm companies write a bunch of papers which we're all supposed to believe are true. But in every case they are based on this unsustained theory, and therefore are not at all true. Can anybody find peer reviewed papers which show a repeatable experiment which clearly demonstrates the virus theory? I can't and I haven't and I've looked. If you have found such a thing please point me in the right directions so I can see it too. But I think the virus theory is like 911 and the apollo program. It's bullshit which is used to steal money from us all and in this case our health too. However the new technology that we still don't have access to is the technology which turned two giant buildings into microscopic dust particles in a few seconds while we watched. That is real. That could get us to and from the moon inside of the waldorf astoria. we could even bring the swimming pool. And all of the doofuses here refuse to believe in that and they've seen it with their own eyes. I was just looking at misinterpretations of the seismic data from that day. It didn't even mention that there were no s waves and p waves, only surface waves. The waves measured show that suddenly 350,000 tons of weight was removed from the surface. Figures don't lie but liars can figure. Not sure who said that before my mother did, probably somebody famous.

Ясно видно,что сердцевина здания,стальные опорные балки, мало пострадали. Здание не могло обрушиться из-за самолётов. Кроме того здание WTC 7 тоже обрушилось,но самолёты туда не попали

​@@user-yg7zn6cy8oбесполезно объяснять. У них другой менталитет) они более подвержены массовой истерии и доверия к дядям с погонами. А мы наоборот никогда дядям не верим) Мне как инженеру по образованию очевидно, что самолёт из алюминия даже на скорости в 500+ км в час не способен сложить это здание пополам. Сердцевина максимум погнута но не порвана. И авиационный керосин не способен гореть с такой продолжительностью и температурой при дефиците кислорода, чтобы расплавить стальные колонны. Там инженеры тоже не дураки проектировали. Здание было рассчитано и под самолёт и под мощный пожар. Не было рассчитано оно только под систематический подрыв силовых элементов по площади) а и ещё, если бы верхушка даже и рухнула, то рухнула вбок, в сторону гле самолёт врезался, так как там больше топлива горит и больше погнуто колонн, и скорее всего частично разрушив под собой этажи, она бы рухнула под углом на город, но уж точно не прямо вниз как при инженерном сносе) Самое доверчивый народ это американцы. ))

It is hilarious how you are too $tupid to see how your own comment conflicts and proves that what you are saying is not possible really is possible. You don't think that a smaller lighter weight material (the plane) can do damage to a large dense material object (the tower) by giving an exact example of a lighter weight material object (the bird) doing damage to a larger dense material object (the plane). You just can't make up this level of $tupidity.

Lightweight material? The plane weighed close to 150 tons going 500+ mph. You expect it to bounce off of the building?

That would be absolutely horrific for any family members of the people that lost their life's.

@@randomsimpsonsquotes6033 false. it would present closure.

Um pretty sure the phones would incinerate so there wouldn’t be any footage

I think the people in the floors above the impact zones were basically cooked. A lot jumped, but not everyone needed to. I think some waited. It is horrifying. However that is the story in a high-rise block and uncontrollable fire (like Grenfell tower here in UK).

@@marykathryn4713 the can go live on the phone so there would be footage

What blows my mind is that they take the videos off they don't want you to see and they promote videos that fit the official narrative!

@@nunyabisnis1448 narrative bro lol I agree though check my wake up playlist

It's blown my mind today tbh.

Soo true man, this video seems like the stone ages but at the time it was legit!

@The Internetwanderer it's not mama America. It's the Zionist Zombies who did that to our beautiful little world!

Paws n Claws thx

It is!!!

so we find that simulated aluminum can cut through simulated steel beams....hmmm, but what about real ones?

@@RoverIAC steel would win

ah yes. it was supposed to bounce off and plough into ground, do you realize how much power and momentum a boeing will have at that speed?

You have to consider the energies at those speeds. As seen repeatedly in tornado and hurricane damage, even small, light-weight materials can do amazing things when given enough energy and velocity.

And what about building 7?

@@TheStrangeKage That one is unexplainable. In my opinion, the fire marshal and the city probably deemed it too expensive to repair (cheaper to rebuild), so they imploded it and just lumped it in with the other buildings as a loss.

@IAmNeomic do.ypu understand what it takes to rig a building day of during a pandemic to be a perfect execution? (Video of my 911 experience, dropping tomorrow) I was right by building 7

What about the plane hitting near the top but many ,many floors below collapsed like a controlled demolition

_"no core column showed a temperature above 250 degrees."_ Here's the full quote. You left out quite a bit there. *"For columns HH and C-80, few areas of paint were observed (three to five spots per column) with no indication of temperatures over 250°C. Note that these core columns represent less than 1 percent of the core columns on floors involved with fire and cannot be considered representative of any other core columns."*

Mark H You speak of truther dishonesty, and yet you state your opinions as fact. The head of NIST has stated that NIST did not test for explosives residue. Your thinking that they did, does not make it so.

IXL2BW _" NIST did not test for explosives residue."_ You didn't read or didn't understand my post. They inspected the steel for failure signs and clues.... They did this at the scrap yards.... this would have included the EXTREMELY OBVIOUS damage from any explosives destroying the steel.... in fact had there been any damage from explosives it would have been so obvious that it wouldn't have been seen at ground zero when they were pulling it out.

We are not talking about what should have been done, we are talking about what was done or not done. And in this case, like I said before, the top guy at NIST said that they did not test for explosives. Look up the video "explosive evidence" and see for yourself. Your claims are not fact, only opinion.

IXL2BW Again you did not address... or did not understand my post.

Creep

@@kings5218 You've added tons.

Can jet fuel melt steel beams?

​@@kings5218 No

@@NothingToPointOut24 you prolly weigh tons

Have MythBusters explored this topic?

True

a cruise missile hit the pentagon, not an airplane.

@wnwlknsn Thank you, we all saw it on tv with our own eyes, how the hell does he come up with cruise missile.

@@daktarioskarvannederhosen2568 yeah, you keep watching Faux news, and the rest of us adults will watch the real news.

@@dianakibbe1885 you saw the detailed aftermath on tv didya? considering that no detailed aftermath was ever televised, i find that unlikely. are you aware as to what rolls-royce's response was when they were asked for engine model details when given whatever details were available about the engine in the wreckage aftermath? btw, i don't merely 'watch the news'.

911 in NYC taped a call of a man calling FDNY . THEY put it on UKposts. He was on the 86th floor..or above it..😢 UKposts later took it off

Fart

I called in sick that tuesday morning. I just got home from the store, the first plane had already hit. I thought it must've been an accident. Then I 💩 my pants when I watched the second plane hit the other building. I knew then that it was no accident.

@@trxtech3010 Bout as funny as my foot up your ass eh.

@@trxtech3010 you’re a horrible person.

👍

Funny how we both ended up here today

@@jsforce77 Yea 2007 youtube. UKposts was only 2 year old..and this guys talked what happened 6 years ago.Now it's 20 years wow since that terrorist attack.

This needs to be simulated on Beam.NG drive

The first Matrix movie is from 1999, just saying...

@@OrlandoMGarcia and while they are at it also see what happens when that stunt bus crashes into it at full speed

Same here

I: Yes And click in the video.

its still too soon.

right? :(

See how a tiny thing can do massive damage when crashing in high speed?

What's your point?

“But a *jet* will fail if a bird flies into the *propeller”* ok

Yeah, and no airline debris

plus how all surveilance camera's around the pentagon went down at that exact moment, odd!!!

Try to google "how buckling contributed to WTC collapse".

@@curiouscat8457 thank you.

The demolitions were placed perfectly by demo experts. Did you know that the chief of security until 9-11-01 was Marvin Bush, George bush's little brother? YES george bushs brother ran the WTC SECURIITY and his contract ended 9-10-2001...

And how did building seven pancake too when it wasn't even hit? Huh? Call me paranoid but I want an answer to that question. Come on! Answer!

@@robertpatterson3321 As you can see, Bob, your question is still far from being answered four months later. Not surprinsingly, since it's been around for no less than twenty years... The truth is uncomfortable for so many!

Why don't you act it out yourself and see how it goes?

@@MFitz12 I did. It worked. Im dead

You, sir, rule!

I farted

Elan Danks thanks Elan

I wasn't aware of the counterweight of that size in the towers, but it doesn't surprise me. I remember watching a summary of the building of the Burj Khalifa, and that has an approximately 400 ft long counterweight structure in the building to counteract oscillations due to wind/quakes.

No they didn't. There are significant differences between the collapses of the two Twin Towers even though they were both of identical design and hit by the same type of plane. The collapses of Building 3, 4, 7 and St Nicholas Church were all completely different.

@@MFitz12 why waste your time trying to educate someone that is clearly a moron??

you are just too dumb to understand, so you're clinging to stupid theories :D

Demolition job all rigged prior to the day

mm hmmm interesting.

Good reference

Somewhat untrue

They did though. BOTH AA11 & UA 175 VAPORIZED when they hit the WTC towers. I was in NYC on 9/11 as was my Aunt, and she personally witnessed AA 11's impact into the North Tower (WTC 1) from the Brooklyn Heights Promenade. I was further away (but also in Brooklyn) from Lower Manhattan and didn't see the impacts, but I felt both shockwaves, and heard the reverb echo from UA 175 hitting the South Tower (WTC 2) and it was INSANE like a thunderclap, BUT MUCH lower and rumbling. I was in the shower when AA 11 hit the North Tower (so I didn't hear anything because I was surrounded by the Tile of my bathroom and the door was closed), but I felt my building shake. I thought it was just the Subway passing underneath my building like it did multiple times daily, but no.

I'm with you. I'm an iron worker.. the building would still stand. They blew it up. Just like daddy tried 10 years before that.. bin ladin was fake. Just an excuse to invade the middle east for weapons of destruction that never existed the way it fell was in sync with controlled explosives.

it doesn't need to "melt" the iron,. it doesn't have to be turned into a liquid before it gives way,..

@@PresidentCamacho2024 1 plane, the fuel from 1 plane somehow made it to make the entire building fall close to perfectly linear. There isnt even a 1/999999999999999999999999 chance that that could happen and it should go further, its literally impossible

1- fuel is not the only thing in the world that burns 2- no steel or columns melted. 3- no tower fell perfectly. There you go..your $tupid questions answered.

@@pacman3556 Why are you mad because you know youre wrong:D. I mean at 14 years old you should be able to comprehend that its a demolition. Or maybe youre under 14? Please dont tell me your an adult please.

@@MrOrangeonion I am not mad and I am not wrong. But thanks for the pointless comment I will take it as admission you can't refute the points made.

heartbreaking post

I was only a 1 year old when it happened. But my mum had turned the TV on and was shocked an sickened by what she saw, it was 3 in the afternoon over in the UK at that time.

@@EuanWhitehead you are little older than my son Anders . He was in the womb that morning ( born late Oct 2001) He would flip inside line a dolphin, ( different wife ) none my other 4 children did that . Had birth trauma , he very healthy

@@stevengriffin5349 Cheers, our generation has grown up with some real issues sadly, but there are many who live on to be successful.

bruh the US does a 9/11 level of causalties attack on a weekly basis. tragedy for us and collateral damage for everyone else...

Like the analogy ... and think I get what you mean; however, I believe this to be an accurate simulation of what went on on that horrific day, albeit it is impossble to simulate the terrible experience of actually having been there ...

@@bacchantedryad So you ran your own simulation and got similar results?

No, unlike the Titanic, the structure seem completely intact.

No, unlike the Titanic, the structure seem completely intact.

not bad for being done with January 2002 computer huh? Crazy part is, the computer they used for this simulation was considered the most advanced computer in the united states at the time... I do believe this was partially done on NASAs computers. those computers compared to SC of today? not even a comparison anymore... like putting a regular Nintendo side by side with a PlayStation 5. I honestly wish they'd go back and re-do the simulation again, today, with the current tech. It would be far and above any simulation we've ever had depicting the attack.

Fake

Is that what happened? Are you sure? They also said a plane hit the pentagon.

both happened@@xxxhoodooxxx

Yes, United 93@@xxxhoodooxxx

You mean in the field? The one that a man said he saw and says looked like a hole with burning trash in it!?

We still dont have an idea what was going on. The only thing we know is that the world has gone totally crazy after 9/11. The world is really upsidedown compared on how it was before 9/11.

Was made to shock.

@It doesn’t matter What your name is 👍

So the word wins the focking patriot act.

not a good sign. you saw images on tv and didn't know what you saw until your mommy told you what you saw? And the TV told her what she saw. What's the point of having eyes and a brain?

The airplane was going between 500-600 mph they wouldn’t have felt or known a thing

Did not happen this way the the Twin Towers were demoed and the new type of energy weapon was used to bring them down

Все самое тяжёлое приходит именно к family members. А им совсем не тяжело, мгновенная смерть.

In accident situations our self quickly separated from our bodies. We're aware but in split seconds we jump out of our bodies and never feel a thing but those who maybe got trapped somewhere else in the incident unfortunately and didn't die in a moment notice they sat w pain eventually once shock wares away and reconnect w reality of something terrible happened but what.. dose this help?

Idk... I watched a video about the people inside the towers calling their loved ones

Very simple. Once the remaining steel structure was softened by the subsequent fires, the combined weight of the floors above the compromised areas caused them to yield. Once that momentum began, each succeeding floor of concrete was pulverized outward and downward into the next floor. Steel columns were no match to hundreds of millions of pounds of concrete (each building was estimated at 1 BILLION pounds each above the street) and collapsed outward and downward as well. Those huge plumes of "smoke" that billowed out with the collapse were in fact pulverized concrete particles...extremely bad for one's health. No demolition of any kind was used or needed. Sheer physics did this.

@@kurtfrancis4621 OK then why do controlled demolitions fail miserably sometimes? And explain the 3rd Building, which was not hit...? Building fire? There are many failed controlled demolitions. Believe what you wish. Of, and where did the molten steel come from? Jet fuel is basically kerosene. One can easily see most flashed off in a matter of seconds outside of the building.

@@ericmuetterties1984 You'll get crickets on that one. But physics, to many of these internet professionals, has diesel fuel fires vapourizing titanium.

@@livestock9722 Certainly questionable why there was molten steel in the basement for months. In fact the molten metal was a huge hinderance to cleanup. Still trying to figure out how to melt steel with diesel fuel ;-) Most don't realize Jet A is diesel. Also most of the fuel was burned immediately in a visible fireball. Oh well... The truth is too hard to swallow.

@@ericmuetterties1984 The whole thing continues to be questionable. Especially over 1 billion in precious metals that went missing from WTC7 underground vaults, that happened to fall in on itself so precisely, all by it's lonesome. Maybe it was sad...

Kinetic energy

@@MFitz12 - Throw an egg against a concrete wall and the egg will go through the wall because of "kinetic energy"? Airplanes are like empty, thin aluminium cans. It doesn't matter how fast you shoot an empty, thin aluminium can against thick steel, it won't go through it. Even a bird can put a big dent in the thin nose of an airplane. And the wings of airplanes are especially flimsy. They would have ripped right off at impact against the huge steel beams and fallen down to the street. This video is pure BS. It reminds me of the "physics" demonstrated in episodes of Wiley E. Coyote and the Roadrunner.

@@TorMax9 - If the egg weighs 117 tons and is moving at 470 mph, then make the concrete wall a large bird cage instead and you will be closer. If you are going to load your argument at least don't make it so freakin' obvious. 🤦‍♂🤦‍♂

They cannot! Congratulations on being more intelligent than most! Brainwashed ignorant people! GOD Help them!

@@TorMax9aircraft have titanium structure my guy.

.. and nano thermate shape charges. Nano thermate was discovered in the dust.

@@buttafan4010 Who says, a RW nut job? Conclusion: There is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles that you would expect to see from a thermite burn. They say the red/gray chips found in the WTC dust at four sites in New York City are consistent with a carbon-steel coated with an epoxy resin that contains primarily iron oxide and kaolin clay pigments. And there is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips, so the red layer of the red/gray chips is not thermite or nano-thermite.

@@douglasross594 Can you find specific faults with Harrit's scientific paper? Who are the THEY you are referring to ... N.I.S.T.? NIST did not test for accelerants because they said there were no loud explosions. Thermate does not make loud explosions. And stop calling it thermite. It was not thermite. It was nano thermate; basically thermite + sulfur that has been weaponized. So there was no arson investigation as mandated by NYC fire regulations. I called several NYC fire investigators, and some from other major cities, and they all said that they do not "pull" buildings ... as Larry Silverstein stated on video. Are you a person who conflates religious and national myths such as those outlined for the 9/!! Commission members before their first meeting by Philip Zelikow. Why would side with the Mossad?

Israel did !X/X!

Less about object strength and more about speed and weight. The plane was more or less disintegrated on impact. However get any heavy object moving fast enough and you can punch through anything.

You could punch a hole through 12 feet of concrete with a sock if it was moving fast enough. The energy of a moving object is equal to the MASS of that object (not material strength) multiplied by the SQUARE of the velocity. So while aluminum wings are much softer than steel beams, they could absolutely inflict enough damage to sever them at high speeds.

By your logic anything stronger than an aluminum can will deflect a plane hitting it at any given speed. Think before you post. Kudos to the responses above mine.

@@devinpol4258 top comment is what happens when people who don't understand physics try to wax poetic on physics. I'm an idiot and even I know there is more to the equation of airplane vs skyscraper than the material strength of the individual parts involved in the collision.

@@matthewhale1572 Absolute horseshit. When my 223 exits the barrel of my AR, it flies at more than 3,200 feet per second. It can easily penetrate, wood, concrete and thin sheets of steel BUT WILL NOT penetrate my 1/2 steel target. An airplane is a hollow aluminum can and cannot penetrate through 3” thick steel beams regardless of how fast it’s moving. How many buildings we’re supposedly hit by planes at TWC that morning? Two but three buildings collapsed at free fall speed with tons of debris being ejected sideways at certain instances which is an absolute scientific impossibility. Keep believing guys who lived in caves and couldn’t pilot a Cessna aircraft managed to successfully pilot a commercial airline and fly it in a manner even the most skilled pilot cannot pull off. I wish people would think critically instead of just believing what the TV tells them.

At 180 mph probably minimal penetration. At 470 mph (the velocity used for this model) it is not a problem.

Ya. I watched real footage and the plane goes clean in. Super weird.

@@Goldrefinedthrufire - Does the plane come clean out? No? Then what happened to it?

@mfitz1969 look up video "Evan Fairbanks WTC 9/11 footage". I see some of the plane come out and then a fireball. 6:40 min mark. I stated it went clean in.

@@MFitz12 there’s a core in the middle of the towers with the stairwell that stopped it. The rest of the building was mostly air. They were basically big tubes

+Blu bell You think a plane weighing over 100 tons....travelling 500 mph is like some baking foil? lol

+Blu bell yeah! A 100,000 lb airplane traveling 500mph would just splat on the side!

Ian Pemberton One is designed to take the impact of a couple airliners. and the other is designed for flight. Secondly the supposed commercial aircraft couldnt reach its highest speed which is mid 400's let alone surpass is capability so close to sea level. There is footage of a dump truck driving through smashing though an airplane and then continuing to be smashed when it tried to drive through some concrete.

Jesse Jennings _"and the other is designed for flight. "_ Sure it is... but what does that have to do with the impact force of a 100+ ton object travelling hundreds of mph? _" let alone surpass is capability so close to sea level. "_ This is total bullshit from people gullible enough to believe whatever the pilots for truth morons say. ..these are people who don't understand what VMO is. It's not a physical limit.

+Ian Pemberton so did the planes really cause those towers to crumble like that? The planes hit the top of the building and caused the foundations to crumble?? Really? Dang I need to re-think my whole life if that's the case!

This model makes no attempt whatsoever to explain building collapse. It covers about 1 second in time. Aircraft impact effects only. Why I should have to explain that I don't know.

@@MFitz12because the conspiracy about building demolition is easy to digest than enough civil engineering knowledge to understand why it’s total bollocks The reality the the buildings design required the exterior frame to be held in place as much as the interior frame needed it: and the once thousands of tons of building started to accelerate down by even a few cm - the inertia was unstoppable. As to melted steel - it didn’t need to melt, it just got soft enough in the floor trusses. The building was rated for a slow 707 on empty, (maybe) not a fully laden 737 doing 500 knots!

@@Ralnon - This video has nothing to do with building collapse, only aircraft impact. The OP does not seem to get that. Which was my point.

Oh no, not a conspiracy.

*surely not enough to slice huge steel girders* F=MxA The planes were traveling 2-3 times the speed necessary to sever the perimeter columns.

@@timshea4279 Bugger all mass, though.

@@stephengallagher2209 What?

@@abandonedaccount123 yeah , I edited my comment

Looks like the channel owners deleted my other comment, maybe because someone reported it. This is why the terrorists attacked us because some people want to control what information is available .

@@waynelast1685 no lmao dude you’re being overly paranoid 🤣🤣🤣 UKposts sometimes automatically remove comments if its AI algorithm detects something it deems as inappropriate

@@jamostudios7596 no there was nothing really that bad. UKposts doesn’t remove comments but blocks comments with keywords. There was one woman making crazy comments but still I think we shouldn’t be in the practice of preventing anyone from speaking out even if we think it’s crazy or we don’t like it.

@@waynelast1685 yeah I can agree with that sometimes I put effort into writing a comment only to realize it got auto filtered, which is frustrating

Where you the one that posted a video on UKposts? Of World Trade Center....

Ive been there too m8, i went there with my girlfriend in January 2000, up in the lift to the 'windows of the world' cafe/restaurant, the lift (elevator) was really fast i remembered...but yh, looking down from up there was pretty scary, i think they had them floor to ceiling windows aswell so it seemed worsre when u looked down.....ive still got a framed panoramic picture of the twin towers and N.Y. up in my living room at home in England.....i watched the t.v. for about 2 days solid when the attack happened.... Love to all the victims of 9/11......peace....🤘🤘❤❤

the first 109 1/2 floors are easy.

@@jakeweisenberg3097 No, I never posted anything related.

@@andybennett3736 How great! So cool that you have this picture... at the time there were no cellphone cameras and I didn´t bother enough to bring my SLR Nikon, unfortunately.

I watched it happen. How old are you?

Water jet cutter. Explain.

The simulation didn't claim to have cut through any beams. He said the simulator removed beams that reached a set amount of damage.

_"Lightweight aluminum wings"_ Tons of fuel were stored in the wings.

Those wings are extremly strong. Especially the wing box & spars. At 500 mph, no problem.

@@markh1011 Jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt structural steel

I blame video games

Like who exactly?

Of course not . A very professional demolition job . It must of took weeks to rigged these buildings?

Many of you seem to be missing the point that aluminium cutting steel like a hot knive cutting butter, is physically imposible.

You might think you're crazy for reading this but rest assured that there are many more than the millions of Americans and the 958 links posted here that don't think you're crazy. They think it's about time you got the insight to just look a little more closely at the convenient cavalcade of coincidences and unexplained facts, studies, observations and inconsistencies in the ' Official ' 9/11 story. You might think I'm crazy to suggest that the 9/11 attacks were planned, schemed and executed Black-Ops military exercise disguised as war games, based on a plot perpetrated by the PNAC; copied from Operation Northwoods, and managed by PNAC signator Cheney; who, in an unprecedented move had himself placed solely in charge of five war games exercises involving hijacked planes at the exact same time the WTC attacks were occurring and who had also; three months beforehand, in another unprecedented move been put in charge of all NORAD military responses in the event of any attack though when asked, he lied and claimed it was the President who had to make any decisions about responses; but he was inaccessible; cowering in a room full of 8 year olds and he didn't want to alarm them, ( how conveeenient ) ; and instead of being whisked out of there, he stayed, and stared into space like a stunned rabbit, making nervous jokes, chewing on his lip, tucked away deliberately out of reach of the press; ( yet somehow still managing to put his foot in his mouth ) while people jumped to their deaths from the burning, undefended, WTC Twin Towers. Just ask ONE question. " How did ALL THREE of those buildings just fall more or less straight down, from a paper and office furniture fire; two at freefall speed and the other IN A VACUUM !! ? " Or better yet; " WHY??!! " This page does NOT presume to have answers; rather present material supporting the questions. If you don't feel like reading, just scroll down the list or go to pictures of 9/11 . FIRST read #335. Now let me run my findings by you and see how they settle. Uniform, universal, symmetrical, total collapse at WTC 1, 2 & 7 from fires that were localized and mostly OUT. THIS is a myth; #21 If you see or watch the videos or images of the towers you'll notice that one of them, the south tower had a chunk begin to fall in a huge section, that dissolved before it hit the ground. #13 By the imagery of any prior pancake collapse a large section of this building should have been left in a pile at the bottom, given that it supposedly fell in one piece. However, NO trace of this huge section was even visible after it went into the cloud of dust. "I don't think the current administration has the political capital to pull this off anymore." I don't suppose that $2.3 TRILLION reported missing on 9/10/01 #717 might have been available ? Or $167 BILLION #400 that went missing from the basements after 9/11 ? Or the pallets of cash that vanished in Iraq ? "I don't see how Bush/Cheney could have brought those families into the conspiracy." Can't you imagine ? Look at the passenger manifests. The list of weapons experts, high tech computer guys, retired military all conveniently ' disposed of' so that they can go to their new covert lives as underground covert experts with new identities. Pentagon discrepancies; #25, & #26, #273 can you imagine the absolutely UN-likelihood of the CIA planning an attack on 9/11, as well as five war games being effected of jets crashing into the WTC towers on 9/11 and THEN having it actually HAPPEN ??!! #298 with #896 pdf., #897, #513, #448, #538, #545, #547 And if you haven't looked at any material regarding cell phones in planes; They DO NOT WORK Go to # 372, #909 #928 and about the cell calls by Barbara Olsen ............ ........" Barbara Olson's phone calls are the most suspicious because she supposedly called twice and the person who we have to take their word for that she made these two phone calls is her husband, Ted Olson, who is the United States Solicitor General. Ted was one of the lawyers who successfully represented George W. Bush at the Supreme Court in December 2000, stopping the Florida recounts and guaranteeing Bush the White House victory. He also has admitted to the Supreme Court that the U.S. government lies! So, one has to wonder if Ted Olson was part of the conspiracy and simply lied about her calling him. Also, it was reported that Barbara called Ted collect even though it was reported that she called from a cellphone. Ted Olson claimed that she said the hijackers used boxcutters, which is the only source that the hijackers used them......." AND #340, #329 ( if it doesn't load try ) FBI Admits: No Evidence Links 'Hijackers' to 9-11 #491, #501, #511 South Tower Discrepancies #35, #299 and those " terrorist's ? " ( G.I.'s) #519 passengers, #548 alternate theory, #614 I don't doubt that Muslims hate us. I hate us. The Ugly American is alive and well and living in the hatred of the world, and for this rank and putrid reputation, I hate everyone who lies, cheats, steals or murders for capital gain. BUT you just aren't trying here; 19 Muslims did NOT get onto jets and NOT be on the passenger lists. 9/10 turned up alive, so that proves that anyway. 10 Muslims did NOT shut down NORAD, Cheney did. Three steel re-inforced buildings did NOT fall at 10 floors per second from kerosene ( jet fuel ) fires; they were demolished. A 757 did NOT crash into the Pentagon nor at Shankesville, NOR WTC 7. IF they had, there would have been photos all over the world for years !! THERE ARE no PHOTOS !! Mark Bingham did NOT call his mother from a cell phone on a plane and say to her, " Hi, Mom, this is your son, Mark Bingham " Try to use some investigative intelligence here. And remember; ONE flaw in the Official story deminishes credibility in the ENTIRE story. WHY would the FBI confiscate all the evidence? WHY would the FBI destroy air traffic controller tapes? WHY isn't the FBI even looking for Osama ?

You can't forget that the left wants to "defund" the police, so they on the left seem to have no gratitude to the NYPD...

@@ThetOLogrin - typical....bring politics into it.🙄 The "defund" issue hit the headlines with the George Floyd incident almost 20 years later. I'm certain ALL sides of the political spectrum in 2001 had so much gratitude to not only the NYPD, but every other first responder.🥰

I am from California and liked to sport an attitude about people in New York, but after 9-11 I am in awe of the great people who live there.

Just remember, nz was devastated by this, we will always think about those who lost their lives

@@ThetOLogrin it wont happen, every country needs law and order

Exactly

You may be an FAA A&P certified mechanic...doesn't make you expert in physics or metallurgy. To think you actually believe you know more than the 'SCIENTISTS' who developed this.

@@jamesw71 literally shut up dude. The plane would have disintegrated against such metal objects almost like hitting a wall. No way it would bring the building down, multiple reports were of explosions that day both in basement (wait, wasn’t the impact on the 70th floor?) yeah I say bullshit. Oh, and a full building 7 collapse without ANY impact?

@@jamesw71 yes big boy quotation marks on the "scientists"

Sadly, here we are 22 years later and people still have their heads in the sand. Anyone with a bit of common sense would question the official story, considering the amount of wars that were then supposedly justified by this "terrorist attack" on American "freedoms".