is this meant to be positive or negative?

Craig Steyn theartistcraig I think 🤔 it might be on the representation on vibration and movement, but not necessarily has a historical context. Just like giving form to the wind or water. But that’s my interpretation, but what it makes it an “empty art” is that other people get to do the work and he is designing

ima dissing it for the ptretentious people blabbering their pure twaddle.............

no, but that wouldnt have make the sculpture better or worse really. The work is the work

@@user-fd8fe9hk9q I don't remember why I asked. The aesthetics seem to be computer generated. It's not true that it doesn't matter.

@@latetodagame1892 I didn't mean that it doesn't matter, just that there are perspectives with which you could look at the art that make the way it was made an insignificant part of its contexts. The process for some art is part will significantly change message and meaning, and for other works the process will likely not be a part of the message and meaning. In the case of the later, it would probably not benefit you to pay much attention to the process. It becomes like the wall behind the peice. You could pay attention to it but if it doesn't aid in your understanding of the message of the art, why bother? I can see no reason why Cragg's work would beneficially change in meaning whether or not it was made by a computer. The guy is a formalist

@@user-fd8fe9hk9q interesting. Thanks. Remind me what a formalist is?

@@latetodagame1892 oops formalist was the wrong word. Meant to say the meaning of the work is carried in the form of the work itself. The curves and color of his work would have the immediate same effect on the viewer whether computer generated or not. Again if it's useful to you to take into account his process when trying to ascertain the meaning of his work then do that. But enjoying the sculpture purely as form and material in space is best for me :)

yes, they actually pay to have a room dedicated to a pile of garbage.

Eff-off you ignoarnt see you NT.

Is it wrong to become wealthy of your art?

@@craigsteyntheartistcraig3592 I think it's wrong to be wealthy, just take what you need.

That's called smArt you doodle

How many sculptures that size have you made?

@@valken666: Nonsense. You don't need to be a boxing champ to give an opinion on Tyson Fury, or an Oscar winner to discuss a movie. I am the audience, I can boo, clap or ignore.

@@johnnytony593 :D

brown nosing - talking pure twaddle

It sounds like you're angry. Are you an artist?

Bitter because you don't have the money?

artists are often full of crap. it's the job for them.............. professional level b/s-ing, whilst keeping a straight face