Nicely explained 👍👍

Haah, nice try, you still aren't getting my liver.

I thought Einstein was always right.

@@vaibhavshukla2353 lol.. reality is not a fairy tale. Being in the field of science means being wrong many times.

Who KnOws

😂

I told my dad this joke when I was a kid, after he had explained Hubble to me, and got a ticket a few days later.

200

Nice joke!

You mean 178758km/s? :D

Heh

@Blue Silver or can you, convert to pure energy and then convert back

So... You're faster than light? You can only live in total darkness if you start travelling during the Big Bang... Otherwise, it'll be a long time before you get to the edge / boundary of light... and then you'll be living in darkness.

@@muhammadtahaali614 latom

when you sarcasm is too advanced The problem of moving faster than light, is that you can only live in Darkness

This is a good explanation.

Underrated comment

This is really good example,,,,,

Wow, you made a great analogy

brilliant

You can also use it in smaller examples: for instance, if you want to test a dog wistle, all it takes is for you to ride a bike away from it and you will start hearing it. It's also when an ambulanse is near you, you hear it loud and high-pitched, but as it passes you sound gets quieter and lower.

It's relative 😀

Yoo man most realistic and challenging comments

Even the turtles move but A Banyan tree never, yet it lives much longer

@Prince Kashyap what if the banyan tree moves, but it moves the earth along with it?

Everything depends, i think that comment he made was misused. Like the guy said above here, trees doesn't move, yet that there are ones that live hundreds of years, turtles are another good example, there are athletes that die young from any reason, so everything DEPENDS

xDD

lmao

🤣

No plz no

New video: "Filling the oceans with doritos and mountain dew - Aquatic animals now gaming animals"

Good thing you probably wont have to 😅

@@TjallieBrrr yeah hah

The universe would be infinitely flat, and time would be infinitely fast relative to you.

@@TjallieBrrr probably? 😰

Will be interesting that effects in a videogame with speedsters, like Flash, Superman, Ben10 XLR8, Silver Surfer, Sonic, etc..

@@pilarrosanas5085 yeah, i thought of Flash too, but for movies. They show none of it, just freeze frame

What was the name of the game?

Oh yeah I remember that game.

I always struggled with the colour puzzles on that game

The point is, your speed actually stays the same, only the light slows down. You actually take the same amount of time to move from A to B no matter what the speed of light is. But it does not appear so from your perspective.

Its relativistic space time dilation, not increased velocity. Remember, he is always moving at 2 meters per second throughout the whole game. He is decelerating light, not accelerating himself. So the contraction of space creates an acceleration like effect where distances that took 5 seconds to travel start to take 4 seconds then 3 seconds, so on so forth. The space between himself and his destination is contracting as the speed limit of the universe decreases, bending the rules of relativity into a more observable state.

@@g59enjoyer48 I was making a joke but that’s actually helpful

Ah, I am very literal at times 😅 I'm glad it helped your understanding though! I had trouble with this video at first, its very confusing

*the speed of light is slowed down to walking speed*

It's the same in some other games too. For example Goat Simulator, When you have a suger rush your screen zooms out a whole lot.

and when you use /effect to give yourself speed 255, you screen becomes extremely distorted.

TBH it's more about mimicking the effect stimulants do to you.

Holy ducking shit

Ha, I wish. It's really because a change in FOV presents an illusion of moving faster. If you disable that effect, you can see that speed potions or even sprinting just aren't all that fast-seeming without the FOV change.

God is fictional

@@jameskeelinggaming2319 1:its a figure of speech and doesnt mean someone believes in God 2: let people believe what they want

@@MrMegaMetroid 1. But it implies a belife in fictional deities. 2. Yes sure. Let's use putin as your example. He believes he wants war with the Ukraine. Its killed thousands, crippled the Russian economy and may cause a great depression. An idiot would say "let people belive what they want" 3 we all have a duty to the truth. If you grow up, I'd be delighted to hear from you.

@@jameskeelinggaming2319 3: science doesn't prove or disprove creationism or atheism.

@@pipthewarrior3738 it totally disproves genisis as told incorrectly by the bible so that 3 or more religions testimony of creation blown put of the water. It gives a valid and logical expectation for chemical evolution from star formation to planet formation to biology and the emergence of life plus evolution and speciation has been proven. You wanna brush up on yours sciences that's been done by people doing "gods will" plus you are months late here. The debate died. If your god needed you to speak here, you would have been guided here months ago.

And we gain an increased fov

@@wyvernyx and you gain a speed boost

@Wacky Venky when you think about that, it's _hot_

who needs drugs when u could just play this in vr

Yes. Quite.

And notice how the MIT included giant mushrooms for decor lol.

One pill makes you larger and one pill makes you small...

Ye

Giant mushroom? Maybe it's friendly!

Thats what i was thinking! The mit programmers def like phycidelics

Wtf did you even say?? So good your English is 🤣🤣

But they’re chimneys! 🤪🍄

@@kodakincade8063 Literally "they" is the only word that had a typo.

I always thought they got length contraction wrong when I saw this effect, but it turns out they were right all along!

Hyperspace and warp speed are totally wrong. At warp 10 it would take just under half a year to get to the nearest star. All the stars in the sky would bunch up, moving forwards, none being seen out the rear windows or side-rear windows. All the stars would be in side windows or in front windows. And they would all be either red or blue, except a few that were shining into your side windows, which would still be white.. But, keep in mind, the stars in your side windows had just bunched up, and had been behind-and-to-the-side just before you hit the hyperdrive button. So, the only white stars would be the ones you are traveling away from at a very specific angle. And only that angle.

Warp speed was in Star TREK You said WARS

Interestingly, if you lived on planet far away from Earth, and then moved with speeds near speed of light or even faster¹, you'd feel like you're time-warping into the future, and if you did the exact opposite and looked at Earth, it would appear to you you moved back in time.

@@MultiPleaser "At warp 10 it would take just under half a year to get to the nearest star". Warp 10 in Star Trek does NOT mean 10 times the speed of light. Most trekkies say that warp 10 translates to 1000 times the speed of light. Around 36 hours to the nearest star.

😂

"Even further beyond!"

Kaboom

Voxel Music yes kaboom

@@VoxelMusic yes kaboom

I too have an average IQ

Lol yeah Vsauce is also really good at that. I kinda thought and knew about some things Michael says and i was mind blown when i found out i was right but i found they were questions many people asked

You're not dumb. The only dumb person is the one who has no desire to learn!

​@@Jay_in_Japan people who aren't able to speak are also dumb 😏

@@Jay_in_Japan Truest thing I've heard in a bit, dumb people don't value knowledge, which that itself, is quite dumb.

Good point😂😂😂😂

Flash is fast. Faster than Superman. But his speed doesn't even come close to speed of light. I rather think about how the cameraman can film flash when he runs

@@nowaayy_ In a comic, flash can go 300 trillions of time the speed of light but that's without taking into acount space contraction. He would still go at atleast 99,99999999999... % of the speed of light though.

@@josenobi3022 I didn't know that it's noted in comics. Then DC must watch this video it's nonsense😂😂.

@@nowaayy_ No, DC is right, it's just the guy that calculated the speed didn't take into account the space contraction. The speed wasn't written in the comic

Nah, it's more because our brain doesn't actually know how much time passes, the "life" you live there is hella shortened, you won't have those 18 years of school and 60 of work where everyday you wake up and all that shit, it "feel" like a lifetime, kinda how playing for 4 hours could feel like 2 and studying for half an hour could feel like 3 hours

Dreams are just false memories, though. So don't think of it as a representation of reality, think of it as a representation of memory recall.

@@entiretotalityofwhateverexists yea, its not like it happens exactly the way time would dilate. its rather random

@@gandalf8216 Actually, dreams are modifying the algorithm in your brain and doing probability checks like a neural net.

@@gandalf8216 dreams are not false memories. They are simulated realities that help consolidate real memories and create real memories of these simulated experiences too. They can become more "false" in the process of dream memory recollection after waking up, but that's another thing.

Yeah I was so surprised he didn’t just show the millennium falcon just travel through space, seeing all the stars turn into white lines in a tunnel. Quick and easy way to visualize that effect.

Yeah or the uss enterprise, my mind was blown that all of that was an accurate representation of light speed

tbh i think the effect in movies represents motion blur

Actually, all sci fi movies have it totally wrong, epecially Star Trek and Star Wars. Firstly, you would rarely pass a star. The space ships never travel very far at all. Secondly, all the stars would move forwards, towards the direction of travel. They would bunch up, with none behind you.. And they would all change to blue or red, except for the few stars whose light is coming from a slight angle from the side, those would stay white. The sky would just sit there for many years not changing yntil you reached the closest star, about 3 months after you hit the "warp speed" button, or went into hyperspace. Boring-ass movie, though.

@@MultiPleaser "The space ships never travel very far at all" Have to consider fiction part of sci fi. Considering if spaceship does move that quick that it reaches stars. How would it change?

No that means no one can move at the speed of light without crashing

@@castleold19 but the faster u go the slower time is for you. So he whoud look like he's in slow motion

@@basedguns8218 yes he would looks like in slow motion But I m talking about how he will see things and if the way in this video he can't move without crashing ..

@@castleold19 by using the speed force

@@basedguns8218 thats something new What it is?

i don't know, no one have try it before

@@Gus_Fringus Yeah, i think they should try it..

Yes, with speed of light at 2 m/s, even a mirror would have one second latency when viewed from 1 meter away. However, assuming the universe works according to the same rules otherwise, your brain would have equally high latency so you wouldn't notice it.

@@MikkoRantalainen ok thanks for the info. One more thing, when we look at the Sun, aren't we seeing it in the past? I mean the Sun is so far away from Earth that it takes 8 minutes and 30 seconds for light to reach us. So does that mean we are looking the Sun 8 minutes and 30 seconds in the past? If this is true, then everything we are seeing is in the past right? Even if it is 0.001 seconds?

@@pinkpanther1139 Yes, the light that comes from the sun was emitted over 8 minutes ago. The distance from the Earth to the Sun is not constant so the delay changes a bit over a year. Most of the things are close enough to your eyes that the time delay due speed of light is not meaningful compared to your senses and brain performance.

Mormons are nice people. Yes he's Mormon I grew up in the same Ward as him in Utah.

"Does this dress make me look fat?" "When walking toward you at near light speed, you actually look smaller."

@@bloemundude underrated

They eat upstairs?

@@bobbytheferret6809 There's a possiblity that they may be in a basement, or literally any floor below the 1st.

,,Sorry I couldn't come here faster, honey, but speed of sound is just 340m/s"

deD

deD

deD

deD

deD

I think it would be a good fit for a racing game. Race spaceships around a course out in space at relativistic speeds.

@@Roxor128 Problem is that it would be impossible to agree on who crossed the finish line first :D

ItsMoses I thought about the same thing😆 so maybe?....

My boi steven is pretty fast then🤣

It’s kinda to give you a feeling of speed but yeah, that makes a bit of sense. But it’s mostly for the feeling of speed

pretty reasonable

I knew it reminded me of something

i actually played this game the second time i dropped acid

@Jon Do btw, there is a game called LSD simulator I'm pretty sure, it's on playstation 1

What if LSD's real effect is to actually speed you up to near light speed?

Aise Are you on LSD lmao

@@AiseStyle i think other people would notice lol

orr... is he?

@@KISHORENEDUMARAN i was about to reply this " Is He ?" part XD

@@DragPlix or is he?

@@DragPlix or were you?

@@C.y.c.l.o.n.e yes he is.. or may be?

Not true, if you run into light then you can see it

@@themanofiron785 But eventually, you'll absorb all the photons in front and around you. Without new ones being produced, you'll live in darkness.

@@VivekYadav-ds8oz If the universe is not infinite, if it's infinite than there's always more photos coming your way.

Don’t worry guys he was just making a sonic meme

@@themanofiron785 he said when you move closer to the speed of light, the time slow down. So that mean when you have same speed to the speed of light, that mean all time completely stopped, even the foton or the light stopped.

*[Megalovania intensifies]*

@@jus.some.silly.little.guy. er e er er ee ee ee ee er

Flash had DownSyndrome.

You feel ur vibrations crawling up ur back...

He WOULD* have a bad time. But good joke...

colorful objects RAPIDLY APPROACHING

Not unless you paid attention in school

Latency is the key word here.

@@Jay-cq5qr I didn't pay attention, but I somehow got it.

@@rizwan6387 Explain, please.

@@Jay-cq5qr I didnt i payed attention here tho

BHAHAHAHHA

12:24 Also me, a gamer: oh no, anyway *continues gaming *

Just like minecraft

Lmao I was about to say the same thing because that's what it looks like when you have your fov to the max setting.

I was thinking of Minecraft as I was watching the videos more towards the end

Kusogaki but it was actually normal speed because he slowed it down.

think you mean ,"i'm already here"

Lol.

*in walking speed*

My parents aren't home hmmmmm Understandable

YES

Maybe they knew done about this and decided to add a real physics aspect to the game.

It’s like an lsd trip or something

Bro u right

No

Nah its just bad textures and weird light

Really not that spooky... Tons of games that infinitely scarier, or "eerie" as you put it

no

@@diamante8864 ??

@@diamante8864 ??

@@diamante8864 ??

@@diamante8864 ??

I'm glad that I wasn't the only one that thought of this.

Slightly chilly

super hot moment

Same 😅 He explained it pretty well but I was still like - I dont get it 👁👄👁

Well, I think this kind of topics (advanced for me) need to be chewed and digested properly so that it can be understood.

Yeah I had to watch some parts 3-4 times to understand properly

Same

Right

Exactly

And also in Doraemon 😅

It's a lie in star wars. If you could move near at the speed of light in space, stars would not look like lines, because they are too far from you. But when you get closer to a star like we are relatively close to Sun, maybe you would feel this effect I think.

Imagine if there was a slight miscalculation in the jet’s system and they crash into a planet at the speed of light

Yess thts what i m thinking watching the whole video

Has mushrooms

YESOMG

@@whi2gan It will probably look like flash but literally destroying the surroundings wherever he goes

Ahhhhh

Ehhhhh

Ohhhhh

Ihhhhh

hhhhh

and just like that i have been spoiled

@@someguyinjeans5273 No

@@someguyinjeans5273 No

more like the opposite

@@someguyinjeans5273 no

LMFAO 😂🤣

We've seen The magenta fábric off reality

Haha 😁

You forgot Quote to Einstein !!

3rd person view of the 4th dimension travel. Gonna make a big steppy or normal steps stretched out and really fast. Lol this is a fun thought you've started.

I was waiting to see that too. Like a side by side split screen or something

That is actually mind blowing. Amazing how you can perceive a distant object at different states of time, but the object itself is in the "present".

To answer the first set of questions, you would absolutely perceive the events occurring on that planet as though they were sped up. This would pronounced at any relativistic speeds, so anywhere in that .7c-.9999c range. We could do the calculations to determine just how fast those events would unfold before your eyes, but to simplify, imagine you are travelling towards some planet a lightyear away at 99.99% the speed of light. To an outside observer, you will reach that planet in approximately a year and some change; however, to you, that trip takes only about five days. Yet in those five days, a year's worth of events occurs on the planet towards which you are travelling. As for the second set of questions, it's difficult to say how one might perceive the universe when travelling past the speed of light, our mathematical models fall apart at that point. That said, if you were to move away from that same planet from earlier at near the speed of light, you would still counterintuitively perceive that it was sped up, because time dilation doesn't care about about direction. That said, where when travelling towards that planet it would appear brighter and bluer, moving away it would appear redder and dimmer. Interestingly, and where this all becomes rather confusing, is that the light itself, those photons with the information we're looking at, will always be perceived as moving at the speed of light, regardless of how fast or in what direction we are moving. As an example, let's say that in the very first second of your trip, when you are going 99.99% the speed of light towards the hypothetical planet, if you were to broadcast a radio signal to that planet to tell them of your arrival, they would receive that broadcast three and half days before you arrive and not a second sooner. Although that broadcast was sent from your ship going near the speed of light, it would never gain any additional velocity, and both you and those who received that message would agree about exactly how fast it travelled even though you would disagree about the amount of time it took or the distance it travelled Edit: I was incorrect about the moving backwards hypothetical

@@eclatdeepurer5894 Socrates hit on this a long time ago. Sight requires three things. The thing to be seen, a thing that sees, and a mediator between the two.

Oh really

@@sabitamahela Yes mommy

@@mypowerlevelisover9000 I am son

GrayStillPlays: "Write that down, write that down!"

@@omegaotaku1342 noice i also watch graystillplays

@@PoggersFloppa noice i also watch graystillplays

@@jettaeschroff6924 ok nice. you watch lets game it out? its pretty much same as graystillplays

@@PoggersFloppa noice I also watch let's game it out

i think it's just a filter and not an actual calculation