Starship 29 Rolled Out for Preflight Testing | SpaceX Boca Chica
Переглядів 76,837
День томуShip 29 was rolled out to Pad B for static fire testing ahead of flight 4. Meanwhile, damaged flex hoses were removed from the Booster QD and scrapping of Booster 4 finally began.
🔗 NSF Store: www.nasaspaceflight.com/shop/
⚡ Become a member of NASASpaceflight's channel for exclusive discord access, fast turnaround clips, and other exclusive benefits. Your support helps us continue our 24/7 coverage. Click JOIN above to get started.⚡
🎥 Video from Mary (@BocaChicaGal), Jack (@theJackBeyer), Sean (@SeanKD_Photos), and Starbase Live.
✂️ Edited by Thomas (@_thomashayden).
🔍 If you are interested in using footage from this video, please review our content use policy: www.nasaspaceflight.com/conte...
L2 Boca Chica (more clips and photos) from BC's very early days to today.
🔗 forum.nasaspaceflight.com/ind...
(Join L2 and support NSF here: www.nasaspaceflight.com/l2/)
#SpaceX #StarbaseUpdate #SpaceNews #SpaceExploration #RocketLaunch #Starship #BoosterTesting #SpaceTechnology #SpaceXUpdates #SpaceXLaunch #SpaceXStarbase #SpaceXNews #SpaceXUpdates2023 #StarbaseLaunchSite #StarshipModifications #SpaceXLaunchPad #SpaceXTesting #SpaceXProductionSite #SpaceXSteelPlate #SpaceXManifolds #SpaceXBoosterTesting #SpaceXLaunchUpdates #SpaceXUpdates2023 #SpaceXSpacecraft #SpaceXDevelopment
Timestamps:
0:00 BQD Rear Hood Removed
0:14 BQD Umbilicals Removed
2:09 Work on the Chopstick Connections
2:40 The Orbital Launch Site
2:52 The Orbital Launch Mount
4:13 BQD Umbilical
5:28 Shielding on the Launch Tower
5:41 Crews on the Tower Elevator
5:57 The Ship QD Arm
6:11 Top of the Orbital Launch Tower
6:26 Tower Sections Eight and Nine
8:10 Booster 4 Prepared for Scrapping
8:50 The Rocket Garden
9:08 Starfactory Construction Continues
9:32 Vertical Beam Installed
10:28 Ship 31 in the High Bay
10:41 Ship 29 in the High Bay
11:05 Ship Stand Lifted Onto SPMTs
11:28 Door for the New High Bay
12:11 S29 Lifted Onto Transport Stand
12:25 Office Building Construction
12:54 Booster 4 Rolled for Scrapping
14:44 Booster 4 Moved to the Mega Bay
16:12 The Orbital Tank Farm
16:36 Ship 29 Rolled to Suborbital Pad B
19:57 Ship 29 Lifted Onto Pad B
20:14 Sunrise Behind the Launch Site
20:33 Booster 4 Cut in Half
21:49 Ship 29 on Pad B
22:07 OLM Alignment Pin Reinstalled
@HarryNicNicholas Місяць тому
i know it's repetitive but it never ceases to amaze me how much activity is going on at any one time, and how they always seem to have the right kit in the right place, hats off to the staff who make all this happen.
@DebraJean196 Місяць тому
So cool to watch boosters and ships roll past “Gateway To Mars” sign. Fitting somehow!!!!
@jamiem7007 Місяць тому
I always find these updates very relaxing to watch. Anyone else?
@faisalsvideoworld Місяць тому
same a good cup of horlicks shortbread biscuits and these updates is heaven for a space nerd like me
@user-jj6qe1yx6s Місяць тому
Turn around time will only get better from here, cant wait for flight 4!!!
@MrKellymcilrath Місяць тому
Great footage Mary, Jack, Sean, and NSF, Thank you so much!!
@corrinastanley125 Місяць тому
Thanks Mary 🌷 , Jack and Sean. I really appreciate the close ups.
@Orangenugget7 Місяць тому
Can’t wait for flight 4!
@faisalsvideoworld Місяць тому
same
@sebifarcas7611 Місяць тому
Rest in pieces booster 4, 2021-2024, you will be missed😢
@faisalsvideoworld Місяць тому
rest in pieces booster 4 we hardly knew ye
@mjomalleyfl Місяць тому
Great photography from Jack, Mary and Sean. Mary has great close-ups, Sean is so artistic. Jack is a reliable, dependable professional photographer. Keep it up. And the scripted podcasts are top-notch. I'll pass on the livestreams, but that's my personal take. Thank you all for the content.
@samm0110 Місяць тому
Another GREAT sequence (13:56 -15:30) showing us just how big these SHBs really are. Brilliant shot NSF, maximal kudos!!
@tennriverluver3534 Місяць тому
The amount of work happening there is staggering! Amazing they are even able to find that many workers.
@ricklarouche4105 Місяць тому
We were onsite before #3 last week, and it is amazing the pace they are working at..
@GreenLeaf1008 Місяць тому
Love the up-close footage! Thank you!
@Sidarathon Місяць тому
NSF: Comment if this is a job you'd do Me: Not a snowball's chance in Hades
@DavJumps Місяць тому
*Raises hand*. Yes, please. Elevator keys ftw. Far as I know, no one has ever BASE jumped the OLIT, and that's just a dang shame.
@saskcanada94 Місяць тому
I WOULD APPOSULUTLY LOVE WORKING ON THESE HEIGHTS LIKE THE LAUNCH TOWER
@Aerospaceshorts Місяць тому
Flight 4 soon🔥
@flips300021 Місяць тому
Yep! I have never known anything like it, in all my years! Just how fast things are moving. Even, NASA cannot comprehend. They are so way behind. And they know it🙂🙃
@Aerospaceshorts Місяць тому
@@flips300021 if you were to show the starship program to nasa during the shuttle era they wouldn’t believe you
@Vatsyayana87 Місяць тому
And its not their fault..@@flips300021
@corbindallasmultipass Місяць тому
space x has A LOT of work to do to make its stage 0 rapidly reusable. Keep up the great work! They will get it figured out.
@itsskip Місяць тому
Anyone else realize that SpaceX is literally creating a small city in the timespan of months? It is amazing to see this development happen so rapidly.
@Geezers_Golfing Місяць тому
I expect on the next tower, the BQD will be part of the tower and not the OLM, and retract well out of the way prior to launch, otherwise repairs after each launch will slow down the expected reusability rate. One thing about SpaceX, they learn and improve everything with each launch. Great video NSF.
@Vatsyayana87 Місяць тому
Personally i think it will be a similar setup. I really dont think during normal operations they will be doing the pad avoidance maneuver which is why the BQD gets blasted like that. Thats not a normal thing for launches and is done because they arent confident enough that the rocket wont turn off and fall straight down onto the pad right after launch. I think it might be time on flight 4 for them to start going straight up and spare that QD for such punishment now that they have shown they can get all engines working properly. If not on flight 4 then i expect it soon.
@jamesrosar3823 Місяць тому
They are replacing the BQD hoses again because they have to make them flex fast when they are super cold. Super cold and flexible materials don’t exist. They would need to make a series of right angle parallelogram joints in rigid tubing to have a chance of re-usability, and even that would be an expensive long-shot, but better than this.
@Krell666 Місяць тому
Its interesting how rudimentary and heavy industrial all the infrastructure is for what is a high-tech endeavor.
@MarcelHuguenin Місяць тому
Stunning video you guys!
@benjaminbeamon877 Місяць тому
I would love to see a video from inside the launch table during liftoff
@tha1oneasianguy Місяць тому
wow!
@sthnguy779 Місяць тому
Imagine when there is a shed full of these consumable parts ready to bolt up after every launch..
@DebraJean196 Місяць тому
Looks like the OLM and BQD took a hit this time…😢 Thanks for the great views Mary and Sean!!!!!
@Vatsyayana87 Місяць тому
Yeah they have been doing a pad clearance maneuver on take off for all three launches since they dont trust it not to fall straight back onto the pad yet. This makes it blast that side of the OLM directly. So its been damage from all three launches building up there. With two perfect lights of all 33 and engines running full duration on the second and third flights, i think it might be time to start going straight up and sparing the poor OLM and BQD..
@knowledgeisgood9645 Місяць тому
@@Vatsyayana87 I am not sure they don't have to do that every time for other reasons. They might blast the BQD a bit less if they are vertical, but not by much. The plume widens a lot on take off so the BQD would still be roasted. It needs better insulation and maybe a bit of LN2 sprayed inside and maybe water on top. It becomes an oven (from ~ -200°C), which does the hoses no favors. The sound vibrations must rattle just about everything inside it too.
@Vatsyayana87 Місяць тому
Can you think of another reason to do it? I cant really. Its inefficient and damaging to lean over immediately after liftoff. Would be kind of foolish to design a system like that. Also the plume doesnt widen a a lot, Its pretty much the same width as the rocket all the way through the plume, sure a meter or two of soft stuff on either side but the energetic high velocity stuff is very well maintained even when its higher and twice as long as the rocket. Yeah the vibration is pretty extreme on its own for sure but nothing compares to a direct blast of the booster pointing straight at it right after lift off. Flight 1 showed whats that is like pretty comprehensively.@@knowledgeisgood9645
@MrGoesBoom Місяць тому
Pulling apart the ( relatively ) old boosters and ships, I wonder if during scrapping they just look at them and shake their heads "We actually thought this was good design at one point?!"...I mean, considering all the changes they've made since 4 was built that sucker is a dinosaur
@00kt86 Місяць тому
There's no way I'd go up in one of those ultra tall buckets...No way
@knowledgeisgood9645 Місяць тому
Those lifts (buckets) are used for wind turbines and the like. These here reach 90m, but I know of those that reach 115m too. They are made by engineers that are experts at this kind of thing. You really need to do something very intentionally stupid to have any accident happen. I think working with scaffolding is much scarier.
@00kt86 Місяць тому
@@knowledgeisgood9645 It would scare the bejeebies out of me no matter how many 4 year sheepskin wonders engineered it!
@Vatsyayana87 Місяць тому
Oh you mean the sky lifts lol, my apologies and 100% agree. I would shake too much to operate.
@JasonEdney-wp7pe Місяць тому
for all the britsh guys, when u saw booster 4 rollout and saw the scaffold boards platform round it, did u also think about fred dibnah
@jamier.6634 Місяць тому
was imagining Fred hammering dogs straight into the booster to tie his ladders to it.
@emobloom Місяць тому
"Did ya liiike that?"
@renesoucy3444 Місяць тому
Beautiful tilling features on the front edge of the forward fins of Ship 31! Awesome! Like a lizard skin.
@gabsiyou Місяць тому
Incredible noise level 😮
@tomasbenedictomaza Місяць тому
estupendo y extenso reportaje
@marinmitu995 Місяць тому
9:07 Despite the very strong winds blowing from the ocean shore, the S 20 did not move despite having its flaps open! 18:44 Where did the front reflectors go?
@ThexBorg Місяць тому
The long kiss goodnight for booster 4.
@DeathHawk462 Місяць тому
Thx
@Just1heyU Місяць тому
That B4 could make a beautiful V2 or V3 after it's mashed up.
@bobferranti5222 Місяць тому
No space agency progresses as fast as SpaceX does. They're not afraid of making mistakes because they learn from them and then improve what they do. I is sad to see Booster 4 getting demolished but that is the how progress works. Too bad they couldnt keep it for posterity.
@matthewboyd443 Місяць тому
Calling it now 4-20 for next launch!😂
@rogerthomas169 Місяць тому
I agree and said it as ift3 was still in the air
@charleshaggard4341 Місяць тому
I hope they are going to design the new launch tower where it is more resistant to damage from the launches. Seems like it needs to be farther away from the launch mount, but that would create some different problems. They are smart people and will figure it out.
@michaeldeierhoi4096 Місяць тому
The launch tower won't be farther away because the chop sticks need to be able to reach the OLM when transferring vehicles to and from it. In fact in a new iteration of the chop sticks planned for the 39 A pad the chop sticks were much shorter. Whether that design is used here remains to be seen. Personally the idea of the booster being caught closer to the tower seems . . . .dangerous! Either way we won't know for a while.
@user-iv4pf6oq7q Місяць тому
People have a very short attention span nowadays... I think there are too many other distractions. Thank Heaven there are still some single-minded adventurous types left to do these small things like: take us to Mars. We Love you, SpaceX, from Great Britain.
@arfurdaley4813 Місяць тому
These things always explode!
@user-bt7bg1qt8e Місяць тому
From brazil
@magras75 Місяць тому
33 Raptors are a hard thing to contain huh lol!
@Vatsyayana87 Місяць тому
Especially when you point them directly at the QD on purpose. This wont be a thing soon, i think on the next launch personally but we will see.
@gslTM Місяць тому
always shocks me that they don't have a better solution for this stuff but then I realize that a: this is the most powerful rocket ever b: the OLM is in test phase too
@Ngatimozart1 Місяць тому
It's a shame that they are scrapping Booster 4. Maybe they could have donated it to an aerospace museum in the US. I wonder if they are going to add an extra tower section to OLM-2 when they build it. Maybe double up on a section around say sections four or five four or five. This would allow for any projected increase in Booster and / or ship height.
@dissaid Місяць тому
Good morning guys...😎😎😎
@DDA40Xman Місяць тому
Thank you for the content. Stay with the name Pad B? I doubt we will ever see launches from it.
@Feszy_ Місяць тому
That OLM realignment pin reinstallation at the end looked like a mess.
@knowledgeisgood9645 Місяць тому
It would not surprise me if the brackets on the pad got a bit out of shape and no longer fit the realignment mechanism.
@MobileGamer18x Місяць тому
When is it flying I was to go see in person
@robertayres8096 Місяць тому
BQD has incurred damages after every launch so far. Maybe it requires a redesign.
@classic_sci_fi Місяць тому
Nothing like sending a $50M booster to the scrap yard!
@greyman003 Місяць тому
How many are built and waiting? How long does it take to build?
@Vatsyayana87 Місяць тому
About 4 are built, in different stages of finished of course. The time changes quite a lot due to so many things from upgrades to back logs to work being done on the site and such to give a real time frame. Once the factory is running and they decide on how they want it be done it will be a little more predictable. But i feel like it only took about a month to make one of the early ships when they were doing high alt test flights. Things are always changing everywhere here but you can say this, much faster then any other rocket that comes anywhere close to the lift class or even a class or two below.
@knowledgeisgood9645 Місяць тому
They don't work on a ship/booster 24/7. Many times they just sit there because the teams are off doing something else. This is still the R&D stage.
@Vatsyayana87 Місяць тому
Thats kind of what i was alluding to. They are proper rapid when they focus one down none stop but so many things around the vehicles force them to take several breaks in the process.@@knowledgeisgood9645
@dancingdog2790 Місяць тому
Let's hope they make Cinco de Mayo fireworks a thing this year!
@edwardemanuel5337 Місяць тому
More videos of this stuff of SpaceX?
@Batters56 Місяць тому
Is there any news on whether Flight 3 lost attitude control in space? And therefore with the next ship rolled out already, will that potentially have the same system on board?
@Vatsyayana87 Місяць тому
Yes it did, from what i recall that is both why the vehicle refused to attempt lighting the engine for a "deorbit" burn and obviously why it re entered in an uncontrolled fashion. Out of the types of isses that come up in these flights they were probably like "easy fix, what else went wrong?" Its just that an "easy fix" problem in this game can still have 100% the consequence.
@knowledgeisgood9645 Місяць тому
No news about IFT3 yet from SpaceX. All you might see is speculation. We will not have to wait that long for SpaceX' report.
@FicarAmriza Місяць тому
IFT 4 GOOOOOOOO STARSHI 29 GOOOOO SUKSESOR
@edwardemanuel5337 Місяць тому
Every day on this stuff?
@themanwnoname3454 Місяць тому
🥂🥂
@flips300021 Місяць тому
This, Phoenix, Will be the best yet. Unfurl your feathers and fly.
@HarryNicNicholas Місяць тому
they angle the lift off to avoid the tower, but if they angled the lift off toward the tower they would burn less kit surely? as long as they are physically clear the flames would just be aimed at concrete and not the chopsticks?
@knowledgeisgood9645 Місяць тому
I think it is likely because of the trajectory of the rocket and not so much what happens to the pad.
@Vatsyayana87 Місяць тому
Well they angle away from the tower exactly for that reason lol. They do not want to spend another year or two replacing it because they trusted the vehicle during the first few flights. Since both flight 2 and 3 were the first and second time they have ever gotten all 33 engines to light and stay lit, i think it is time to start going straight up as it should be and spare the OLM/QD.. Fingers crossed flight 4 is that time.
@HarryNicNicholas Місяць тому
@@Vatsyayana87 good thinking. i don't know how (!) but the OLM really could be a less labour intensive design, if they want to throw two ships a day every day they can't spend weeks cleaning up.
@misdangered4326 Місяць тому
❤ X ❤
@scottymoondogjakubin4766 Місяць тому
Finally we can put IFT3 to rest and start focusing on IFT4 ! Yee Haw ! 🍺
@JoelPelailee Місяць тому
o7 booster 4
@fabiofboful Місяць тому
1:22...It has never happened before, maybe its due stress and this harsh routine....
@The_taurus01 Місяць тому
is ship 29 the same as SN 29?
@Vatsyayana87 Місяць тому
Yes. SN, S or Ship is the Starship. B is the Booster.
@knowledgeisgood9645 Місяць тому
SpaceX stopped using SN (serial number) after SN15 and has since called them S (ship) as @Vatsyayana said.
@not2busy Місяць тому
In my opinion, the OLM is still too fragile for the task of repeatedly launching rockets. Nothing should be exposed to, or damaged by the exhaust by this point. What happens when they upgrade to the V3 Raptors? This should have been built like a bunker, strong enough to withstand the enormous heat and pressure. During WW2, the Germans built these ultra-strong cylindrical air-defence bunkers that are virtually impossible to tear apart even to this day. Perhaps SpaceX should consider that approach. And I still think a flame-trench is needed.
@Vatsyayana87 Місяць тому
Well let me put your opinion at ease. For these first flights they do a pad avoidance maneuver which makes the blast hit that area directly during launch. The fact that the QD survives with just minor damage is pretty incredible and once they feel confident enough to not do this maneuver anymore it will suddenly take 95-98% less damage. Guessing obviously but the vast majority without question. I think flight 4 might be the first time they start launching straight up and this will no longer be an issue. (Since both the 2nd and 3rd launches were the 1st and 2nd times they have ever got all 33 engine running and they stayed healthy the whole way.) A side note, this thing vaporizes steel up to hundreds of pounds per launch (unprotected) and would make any WWII concrete both melt and explode with its sudden and massive heat differential, pressure and vibration. At least good swaths of it per launch anyway. So i dont know, thats a test i would like to see lol
@Vatsyayana87 Місяць тому
Also, the water flame diverter has worked like magic. It has without a doubt proven its good enough for the job. A traditional diverter wouldnt change anything on the OLM at all.
@not2busy Місяць тому
I'm just surprised that any maintenance is required at this stage. The heat and pressure will only get stronger as they go to V3 Raptors and beyond. As the same OLM is also meant to capture the vehicles, I have a concern that damage incurred during launch will potentially impact that function. As for the concrete, newer formulae were developed, primarily for defensive purposes against bunker-buster munitions. They are stronger and designed to withstand a great deal more than ordinary concrete. If used to construct a similar WW2 bunker (Flak Tower) as mentioned before, I imagine it could do the job required. Yes, the deluge system is working nicely. It's just the shock all around the pad that I would prefer to be a bit more controlled than what was shown on the video feeds. @@Vatsyayana87
@knowledgeisgood9645 Місяць тому
They are building one at Massey's for static firing the ships. Let's see how that makes it first. Elon always likes to start at what is minimum, then add complexity if they must - not the other way around. It saves money and any additions would be needed, and not overkill. His rockets are cheaper.
@not2busy Місяць тому
I understand the build-quick principle for developing cars, rockets and robots, but once a stationary function is identified, it should be designed to accomodate whatever is needed down the road and all the time. Like a port harbour or an airport. You can't go repairing a dock every time a ship leaves port or a runway every time a plane takes off. As there are, and will be, so few OLMs available, they absolutely must be there, ready for use, again and again. Otherwise the re-usability is not that much better than the Space Shuttle. Just that instead of the extensive work replacing the tiles on the vehicle, you are instead fixing the ground equipment. Just moving the work time over to another area. @@knowledgeisgood9645
@AbuPaul Місяць тому
9:32 Ummm ... I'm sorry but "Vertical Beam" is not a thing :)
@smavtmb2196 Місяць тому
It's fine if SpaceX scraps booster 4 and probably ship 20. However they better not harm Star Hopper. Alot of people including myself would loose their minds/be heartbroken. I want SpaceX/Elon to agree Star Hopper will be preserved intact for history.
@thomashayden804 Місяць тому
Starhopper should be safe since it's actually listed in various site expansion plans. Seems like it's there to stay like Grasshopper at McGregor. Now the fact that SN15 was scrapped before B4/S20, that's something I have a big issue with...
@smavtmb2196 Місяць тому
@@thomashayden804 I was so angry SN15 was scrapped. It would be even more tragic if it ends up being the last Starship with legs to land on earth. I'm ok with SpaceX catching boosters but Starships should have landing legs. Not just for the moon and Mars.
@KikitoTejada Місяць тому
Of course that's a job I would do
@renesoucy3444 Місяць тому
Why gimbal the rocket so hard at lift-off? Saturn 5 did gimbal away from the tower but Starship should liftoff straight up, it clears the tower faster than Saturn 5 anyway… no problemo.
@byronwellburn Місяць тому
I think it's time sub orbital pad was renamed. It's not going to or hasn't been used for sub orbital for a long time.
@knowledgeisgood9645 Місяць тому
No point in doing that now. It will be demolished very soon anyway to make place for the second orbital pad.
@byronwellburn Місяць тому
@@knowledgeisgood9645 not a chance it will be demolished. They will build another.
@bryanillenberg Місяць тому
@@byronwellburn Sub Pad B will be demolished. SpaceX has made that very clear. A new pad will be used for static fires at Masseys
@byronwellburn Місяць тому
That big flexi never survives. Unless they took it off to look at something else.
@Vatsyayana87 Місяць тому
The pad avoidance maneuver makes sure it cant take more than a launch or two at a time. Im hoping they feel confident enough to stop doing that now.
@byronwellburn Місяць тому
@@Vatsyayana87 the quick disconnect? Maybe if it does keep launching this way put the disconnect on the other side.
@knowledgeisgood9645 Місяць тому
@@byronwellburn They would need to redo the whole pad. All the pipes are going to that side - can't relocate them just like that. Maybe the next pad has that redesign.
@byronwellburn Місяць тому
@@knowledgeisgood9645 no. That would stay the same. Pad 2 I am on about.
@Vatsyayana87 Місяць тому
As the other said, that would be an absurdly massive undertaking. Would cost 1-10 thousand times more then replacing the minor damage here and likely take up to 6-8 months@@byronwellburn
@alexandrdovganj1402 Місяць тому
👀🤳💪👍
@giossico Місяць тому
a lot of rust on the structure of the tower...
@Thenormfloirdaman Місяць тому
Already getting ready for a starship?
@Aku6Soku1Zan Місяць тому
It never stops. Elon sure is rushing through the tech tree.
@Vatsyayana87 Місяць тому
lol, they are building much of the tech tree.
@GasparLorenteGuerrero Місяць тому
😯👍👍✌️✌️👏👏👏👏👏👏👏🇪🇸
@user-jj6qe1yx6s Місяць тому
First!! for the first time
@antonybastin3432 Місяць тому
👍👍👍🇮🇳
@DebraJean196 Місяць тому
Bye bye B4😢
@brianbranson2306 Місяць тому
looks like there just tacking lean to's on to lean to's is there an actual plan involved. #will-it-run
@vergil-__ Місяць тому
goodbye booster 4, it was bad knowing you
@MrLuumpy Місяць тому
When will SpaceX be done being in denial about the failed TPS ? They keep making them with the same broken design. WTF ?
@michaeldeierhoi4096 Місяць тому
The TPS has not been properly tested to determine what and how to improve it. The Space X MO is to upgrade a piece of technology when it is understood why it is inadequate. So because the failed attitude control of S 28 caused it to roll too much the TPS was not properly tested. The tile watchers need to relax and let process at Space X do what it does when it's ready.
@peterwilson7532 Місяць тому
Rapid reusability! Not with this stage zero design.
@UQRXD Місяць тому
This will cure world hunger and house the homeless.
@knowledgeisgood9645 Місяць тому
Every $1 spent on space has given back $7 to us in return. It is one of the best ways to help the world. Helping the hungry and homeless is done everywhere there is a will to do it.
@MrSpacePhoneRepair14 Місяць тому
Have you ever thought about you donating to the homeless or sending money for world hunger? We the U.S don’t have a lot of hunger but many others yes. “Ask not,what your country can do for you,ask what you can do for your country”-John F Kennedy
@UQRXD Місяць тому
I am a homeless veteran.@@MrSpacePhoneRepair14
@thedogfather5445 Місяць тому
Hunger and homelessness will never be cured. Make everyone comfortable and they will have more babies. Demand for resources will always be ahead of supply.
@UQRXD Місяць тому
True the more you feed the poor the more need to be fed.@@thedogfather5445
ExileShow
Переглядів 4,6 млн
Space News Unfold
Переглядів 9 тис.
NASASpaceflight
Переглядів 71 тис.
Amway Home Goodies
Переглядів 20 млн