-O2. O3 is too unstable, haha.

Yeah, it would so another iteration when it's 9 setting it to 10

Also, I am suspecting that you are probably working on a language. I would love to contribute as am working on DSL to help childrens learn.

Hi! Thanks for watching - hope it was helpful! Yes, LLVM is absolutely huge. I've uploaded a tutorial on IR passes recently, with more tutorials to come: ukposts.info/have/v-deo/bI-jhGhre26er5s.html

Nope, .... LLVM tooling chain affectively gives u a target Intermediate Representation code that u transpile onto. In short with for any language u no more generate a assembly u generate code that's compliant LLVM and that now can be compiled or executed by LLVM runtimes and toolchains.

Hi Vicky - in the majority of use cases, the majority of the time spent by an application is in runtime (as this is done many times and can be compute-intensive), not compile time (which only happens once), and therefore doing extra work during compile time is very much "worth it" if you can save time during runtime. The most efficient programming languages by power usage are, in order, C, Rust, C++, Ada, Java, and so on. Note how Java ranks below the AOT compiled languages. This is because, inherently, less work needs to be done at runtime for applications built in these languages. It is fundamentally easier to build optimization and other analysis passes for compilers using the LLVM tooling, and while there are some pros to GCC because it's been around for so long, LLVM is starting to replicate and mostly surpass what it's capable of. Paper on the efficiency of programming languages: haslab.github.io/SAFER/scp21.pdf

Hi Gil - thank you, I'm glad the video was helpful! It's because technically, while the function call to factorial was inlined and then constant folded to a predetermined result, the factorial function still needs to exist. With the specific kind of function we created and compile flags we passed, it's not allowed to just be removed. For example, what if this was being compiled down to an object file and other object files were later compiled alongside this one, those referring to an external "factorial" function that should have been in this object file?

Hi - I already have a video on recursion: ukposts.info/have/v-deo/iYl_hG2MbnerxWQ.html but I can definitely make a video specifically tailored to data structures. Be on the lookout for that soon!

Hi Soumyajit - I released this video a little while ago: ukposts.info/have/v-deo/bI-jhGhre26er5s.html Hope you find it helpful!

Hi - unfortunately downloading models from knowledge studio is not possible and you must deploy your custom models with an IBM Watson service like NLU.

Hi, feel free to contact me at TechLifeSkillsTanmay@gmail.com

Hi! I've uploaded a tutorial on IR passes recently, with more tutorials to come: ukposts.info/have/v-deo/bI-jhGhre26er5s.html

Absolutely! It's a tool I'm learning about myself, and I do plan on making tutorials around it very soon.

@@tanmayteaches if they are done could oyu share link? Thanks

Hi Suporto - Thanks for the question! Inline functions are good, but they're a micro optimization. This means that when you don't need them, it's generally better to not use them. They can increase your final code size, and if the function itself is the bottleneck (not the latency introduced by the number of times you need to call it), then it's more effective to optimize the working of the function itself.

It's a matter of personal preference. In my opinion, assembly can be more confusing because it's more hardware specific. However, LLVM does have its own quirks and complexities that come with being more high level that you may find more intimidating. This includes the fact that its documentation isn't particularly accessible.

yes IITgrad-- Its x=10.

@@VinothKumar-zl2ht how did you know I'm an IIT graduate😲😲😲

Hi Vikash - thank you for your comment! UKposts supports auto translating captions - please let me know if this is helpful. Thanks!

@@tanmayteaches thanks Tanmay...but do u think that you replied me very soon? 😀

Generally when writing code this way, you’d use x as an iterator variable, in which case the last iteration of the loop would be when it is set to 9. Of course, this iteration would also bring it to 10, but that isn’t a value I usually use after the loop. Sorry for the confusion on this bit of logic, hopefully you found the rest of the video helpful!