I mean he even called it before she hit the ball. But she’s not making her point very clear

But you’re right. Terrible call by the umpire and it’s not helping that she also doesn’t seem to be able to express herself 🤣

She defended herself terribly. She should just say the call came at impact and it affected her shot

Yeh it's a clear replay of point. These umpires need to stop interpreting the rules.

@@jesuslovesmebut8180 Yeh but it would be easier if the opponent showed some good sportsmanship and offered to replay the point as the referees usually don't resolve anything.

She's usually whining about everything so it's almost like the girl who cried wolf. At any rate, she definitely got screwed here.

Yes, it should be replay, but she lied to the Supervisor, she said it hit the net and went over, but she hit it into the net. She did lose the point, had there been no call.

@@frederikvater you're not that smart are you... Look at how her body stops diving under the ball soon as "out" gets called. This wouldn't have happened "had there been no call"

@frederikvater you can't say she lost the point had there been no call because the call could have affected her shot. If there was no call, she might have made the shot

@@TheTimster007What does this have to do with my level of Intelligence, that’s a very immature argument, that has nothing to do with the situation… She doesn’t “stop diving”, and she lied about what happened. The last part alone should justify her losing the point. Matter of fact, you having to attack my character, rather than coming with a proper counter-argument, should display how “smart” you are…

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

I think the supervisor didn't understand what the umpire tried to tell him because of her bad english, it really is 100% the umpire's fault because 1st she doesn't even know the rule and how to handle this situation, and 2nd her english is terrible she can't handle a pro match by saying "it didn't over the net" like come on there is no problem for having bad english but with this job you must speak it fluently.

Same umpire when Alize Cornet played Jodie and he wasn't brilliant

They were both out

No ball is a foot out and gets called wrong. That ball looked out, but cmon now.

@@matthoward6130 fr 🤓🤓🤓 its obviously an exaggeration but it was way out anyway

@@sranradovanovic5116 you can't say at least a foot out then pretend its an exaggeration.

The supervisor doesn't take the chair umpire's side. Players just keep calling them out for situations that they have no business being called out for. The supervisor can't overrule the chair umpire on a judgment call, but players act like spoiled brats and refuse to play until they cone out whenever the player disagrees with a judgment call anyways. This is the exact reason why you see several chair umpires in this video flat-out deny the player's request to call out the supervisor, even telling them that it's not a call that concerns the supervisor. Vickery is the only player that called the supervisor in the correct situation here, but then she undermined herself by making her case totally about the umpire's judgment call about whether the call affected her shot.

Why do they need to call supervisor anyway they should respect umpire’s decisions and analyse after the match

My thoughts exactly. It's odd how she couldn't get the the-out-call-came-before-my-shot message across, EVEN THOUGH the umpire admitted it. Instead, an absurd discussion took place about the ball hitting the net, where it landed and so on.

Also the supervisor was so old that he couldn't hear properly, and didn't seem to be all there. Should not be in that role

This is a racist comment.

@@rn6710 no it's not. It's a statement of fact

@@_Simkim That was what baffled me too. The umpire admitted it (and then for some reason backtracked a bit on it) and the old guy summarized it even. AT that moment she could have just said EXACTLY THE CALL WAS MADE BEFORE I HIT THE BALL SO I DIDNT GO FULL ON THE SHOT ANYMORE.

You can even see vickery relaxed her shot after the call. What a disgrace

@@MisterReZExactly! The umpire was looking at the drop shot… Not vickery! How would she realize her body shift into a lax forehand all while overruling the ball. This was a terrible call, and even more frustrating to see the Supervisor just go with what the umpire said…

@@kriskanei7369 the supervisor ruled based on what the umpire told him. He was adamant to call against vickery, but the umpire convinced him she was hitting while the linesperson called out.

That is true but it is only one point in a match of more than 100 points in a match and usually absolutely unimportant for the final resulat. So why interrupt a match and start a 10 minutes discussion.

@@moritzbonn175Because like you and we all know, one point can win you the match or lose it… Being cheated out of a point is still being cheated! If one point is so minuscule then why not replay it?

@@kriskanei7369 Well, most players lose the match because they cannot get over the fact that the umpire has made one wrong decision. The unpire has to make a quick decision and in 99% of the cases it is correct. Many decisions are also bordeline decisions. I absolutely don't want tennis to become a sport where players are constantly arguing with the umpire about a single point. Where should this lead to?

​@@moritzbonn175: Where this should lead to is *Hawkeye* *live* for every WTA & ATP tournament (like Nottingham). Think about it, if they had it, Vickery wouldn't have been treated wrong.

Too many umpire mistakes

It's about a foot long. Not even close.

Agree so was Cornet's call too

Sakkari is may be dishonest but she’s also practically a cyclops. Having eyes less than an inch apart creates all kinds of eyesight limitations

True that

affecting.

And the original call looked good anyway. Everything was wrong in that situation.

Seems like Giorgi probably foot faults a lot and pretty much never gets called. She shuffles her feet around a ton while serving

Right? Because what she was talking about about the net or something is completely unrelated

He didn't do anything wrong there. To Vickery's credit, this one the only time that I have ever seen a player on this channel call for the supervisor in the correct situation because she originally questioned that the chair umpire had misapplied the rules. However, when the supervisor got out there, Vickery lied about her shot going back in play and then made her entire case about the judgment call on whether the call had affected her shot. The ultinate authority on judgment calls like that are given to the chair umpire. The supervisor cannot overrule them. The supervisor let her know the rule, told her that the call did not affect her shot in the umpire's judgment, and that the point belonged to her opponent. Nothing that Vickery said about the call affecting her shot after that would have made in difference in the call. The supervisor left, and the match needed to continue.

@@jarrettpeeples9745 thanks for that, well it looks like we will have to agree to disagree on this one.

@@mikew4282 If the umpires and supervisors waited for every player who complained to stop complaining, no match would ever end. Vickery is complaining to him about something that he does not even have the authority to overturn. He told her that. Play needs to move on. End of story.

And it came right after she hit, so absolutely Penkos point

I think she was kinda joking while trying to genuinely say Giorgi was really talented. Came off really weird though

the latter

Hsieh x Cilbulkova in Wimbledon the only I know haha

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/pHGLbYCrg36W1Gw.html This is the only example I can recall right now

Yep.. just once.. but supervisor's job is hell hard. They come in, everybody is pieced, and they have to make a decision based on what the referee tells. Like in vickery clip, the umpire told the out call was late, when it clearly wasn't. You can even see hoy vickery relaxed her shot because of the call. But thy has to stand with whatever crap the umpire tell them, so there is not much they can do

@@MisterReZ Is there a supervisor for each match? Or are there just a few wandering around not looking at a specific match and spawning out of nowhere when they get called?

@@reticamclovin9508 for sure there is not one per match, but i'm not sure how many surervisors there are per tournament.

He wasn't clueless. He walked into a situation where the chair umpire doesn't speak fluent English to be able to accurately describe what happened, and the player is arguing about a call that he doesn't have the authority to overrule. He made the right decision based on the information that was given to him.

She always manage to earn a lot of points in the 2nd semester every year so now she'll probably play as a top 10 😂

🙏💚

🙏💚

🙏💚

Vickery best WTA player, love her, Sachia was right obv!

@@jesuslovesmebut8180 hahahaha!!!

The supervisor actually did well with the information he was given.

Riske would have not let that fly lol.

Hey, yes, I've seen it. It was quite intense haha

Права