And if not for Djokovic, haha... he would probably have had the career grand slam by now...

@@mintykookieee true lol. But, that could be said for quite the rest of the big 4 😅.

Honestly I don’t think so. Maybe one Wimbledon with the right draw. I don’t think he would have done better against Federer, Nadal and some of the young guns in the era between 2017-2020 to win that many grand slams or big atp tournaments. You have to remember Federer nadal were on fire in 2017 and Novak comeback to top was already mid 2018. No way Murray would have won 3-4 grand slam from 2017 till now.

@@loichte6831 u do know Murray was finally the best player on the planet when he got injured right?!!

@@lukeyb1239 For real he forgot that factor

He is on tour actually

@@christophzika1573 He is on. Unfortunately not in a good form to compete as he used to be.

Thank you for your likes

And it’s special cos it’s the last tournament he won as number 1. Also RIP David Mercer on commentary

That would be Hewitt who won his slams playing with natural guts.Murray wouldn't survive without synthetic strings cause he never trusted his shots.

@@dickn.ormous1064 sounds like you've never picked up a racquet.

@@FrazzaJ2000 Ok,Murray is 6'3 and hits like a 5'10.Didn't he lose at the Australian Open to second-tier serve and volleyer Misha Zverev?

@@dickn.ormous1064 Well Nadal lost to a second-tier serve volleyer at Wimbledon in the shape of Dustin Brown. Even the greats can have an off day, even the second-tier players can play out of their skins on a given day.

Do you no Wimbledon posted a video about Andy Murray’s lob shot

Same...I hope they all can play for a bit longer

Never take things for granted. I still remember Chung's incredible run in 2018 and thought he'd at least win a slam...hope he can recover and bring back that level.

big 4 never existed zd

Nothing ruined him. He was never in the same level of the other 3, and he fully exploited the absence of Federer and Nadal (and the downfall of Đoković) in 2016. Otherwise, he would have never been N1, or won Wimbledon and London that year for that matter.

@@wingedhussars5576 At least Chung got an injury for excuse. I'm still waiting for Aliassime to win at least a 250 title. What a bunch of crap of generations.

Indeed

Not enough victories

@@MinhvuLy With the amount of Slam finals he lost the the big 3? any other era Murray would have had 10 slams minimum, he's definetely top 10 all time.

Top 10 ever is a zero sum game, you would literally need to remove someone from this list: Nadal Federer djokovic Sampras agassi McEnroe emerson Borg lendl laver. Who would you remove and replace with murray?

@@MinhvuLy Emerson obviously. He disappeared when the Open era began.

Andy Murray is ready for the grass court season his first match will be in Nottingham

@@hitanshmukoo7950 When was/is that match and what event is it? xxx

I would like him to beat Evan Hoyt

If he won a masters again I'd be happy. The dream would be winning wimbledon or AO

@@spyrossourelis5376 AO and possibly French, maybe if Nadal wasn’t playing that year, but I hope he completes the career grand slam...

@@mintykookieee sadly I don't think he is good enough to win a slam anymore, let alone 2. I hope I get proven wrong tho

@@spyrossourelis5376 I know... but let’s hope, anything can happen...

Bro same

Even with Novak dominance at AO murray still should have won at least one of the 5 finals. He got the tools and skills. He was just too nervous it felt like.

not sure tbh

I remember thinking when he was fully coming into his prime that his court cover was the best in the world, even better than djokovic at the time. And watching him return serve after serve was a joy to behold. It's only just now, after watching this video that I've realised he's one of the greatest touch players we've ever seen too. The amount of 'impossible' pick ups I've just watched in the last 10 minutes is ridiculous. A truly underappreciated player in a time of greats. Also personally (this may surprise you) watching him growing up as a 'brit', one of the most likeable guys. Or I've just got the same dry/dark emotionless humour as him and I understand his sarcasm where others don't. If you do like his humour I recommend watching Rob and romesh meet Andy Murray. So dry

I'd say the down the line backhand and running lob are pretty signature shots for Murray.

I’d add his backhand slice to the list as well.

Lol his three grand slams Vs Djokovic 21. Give over!

@@incredibleXMan djokovic did much more hard work tho

@@tyrusxiv more than Nadal? No way. The guy has the talent. From 2011 with the diet and the mentality it simply all clicked.

Lmao more gifted than djokovic. 3 vs 24 gs😂

That is one of the most insane things I’ve ever heard

He did in 2012 as well

​@@mrdarren1045and you know how many times djokovic defeated murray in gs finals?

Me too, and my little sister

If it wasn't for the big 3 he would be utterly dominant I think.

@@DjokovicIsOurLordAndSaviour Yeah he Pushed a Lot in early years, struggled against streaky players like Nalbandian, Wawrinka, Verdasco, at times. Not to discredit but he played Much more aggressive against Nadal for instance. Had to. Big 3 definitely made him get much better just to win a slam let alone be in the conversation of the top (all credit to him tho, could've been so easy just mostly give up/ say the top 2 or 3 were too much like most top players sort of... People forget he was Right behind the top 3 for years on end, yet they only focus on slam count/ who won most of the important matches. Understandable, tho definitely makes Murray overlooked/ seem less impressive than he was But reading his autobiography (he wrote far too early in his career), clear he had the drive/ never wanted to lose, I'm sure he'd win probably 6-8 slams if wasn't for the big 3, since big 3 helped/forced to elevated his max level of play, hard to tell how much confidence/ how good everyone else would be without Fed/ Nadal/ Nole. Could imagine maybe Davydenko, Roddick, Delpo, Soderling, winning a couple or few

@@Dman9fp Yeah, I mean most slams he didn't lose to anyone else. Not quite at their level but for sure he was the closest.

along with isner and karlovic he would lob them for fun h2h 17-0 against them.

18>>>3

Prime murray didn't dominant as prime djokovic or federer.