Which Earth city image did you sneak in at @17:28? We see buildings, roads, an airport with runways. Cute to sneak that in for us. Repeated at @17:59 and @20:04.

Where's the images of the SPIRE on the moon? Well known many miles high spire seen previously from an angle on the horizon? Just search gooble images for "spire on the moon".

Another great supercut! Thank you so much! 😎🌚

​@@ramrod0209 No chit. I took a screenshot and zoomed in 300%. Looks like a small town. Certainly not natural. I'm gonna try Google Lens on it. 😁

​@@ramrod0209town shows up again at 20:04. Bottom left of screen.

There are so many inexpensive scopes with good optics for solar system viewing. A huge one is actually far harder to use for that.

lolz, you'll just find out the moon already has owners

@@abrahadabra111 Well, that’s what Buzz says.

Yes, own eyes, irl and realtime is completely different than seeing on a video or photo.

@@Baleur Completely unimportant! The moon doesn't belong to us, that's what's important and btw not everyone has the change for a Celestron telescope

Well it was made of hollow metal though

❤

I dont remember that in Braveheart….!Scotland!

Tastes like no other cheese he'd had before.

It's the wrong moon Grommet

I agree. This really was quite a good essay. Well done.

After following the work of Wallace Thornhill and the Thunderbolts Project for the last decade these standard model videos are hard to watch. Despite the what the naysayers who are afraid to look at the evidence say, the electric universe makes more sense and has made more, accurate predictions.

It is a very good video. I just wish he would have talked about the ancient metropolis at 17:29. Dang!

@@raycar1165 Garbage disinformation.

@@RideAcrossTheRiver Some people want their science spoon fed. That’s fine. But some of us need science to make logical sense. Observable Testable Repeatable Evidence is required. The Standard Model describes a fantasy world. Phenomena are ignored, laws are re-written, data is fraudulent… the Crisis is simple, the world doesn’t match the model. The system is corrupted, expelling any challengers. The model is broken, it cannot make accurate predictions. It’s time to reevaluate, and get a good grip on the basic principles.

Had to make it a decent length, Alex looked at the amount of data and told his assistants, "Let's try to keep it under an hour, but we can always make a part 2 and 3rd part as we go along."

@@MountainFisher grateful for the time per show but yaa if required do up to 10 episodes to tell the story that is needed im sure we would all appreciate it

yah, u gotta find channels that are a bit older, like this one

Are you sure this weird accent isn't AI as well. It's at least someone who has undergone speech training to modify his vowels and hide his real accent. It is very annoying to listen to.

​@@tuberroot1112you're in the minority.

i dont know if i agree with how "conspiratorial" his titles have gotten.. He grabs enough exposure.. no need to attract the science deniers

The joy of discovery is contagious.

​@@raidermaxx2324Who are the science deniers? Anyone who doesn't believe what you do?

If you want to teach people to look at cool things.

@@raidermaxx2324 Useful idiot much?

or from old military image analysis procedures to identify camouflaged buildings. My Dean of Engineering had one in his office and let us students read it.

He never said which way it was inverted though. All i could see was the smooth parts were valleys.

what a great comment! makes sense.

What do you see when you examine high def Moon pictures?

@@mnegreiff i'll bite: craters?

What are you talking about? Yeah, this sounds like fun! Let's stare at a bunch of craters. This video was dull nerd stuff.

@@4emcarthur Then why r u on this channel

@@getnoob3945because usually this fellow Alex does put out primarily awesome content. I'm just a bit bored by crater porn. That's all.

But ​@@4emcarthur, 17:29 made it all worthwhile!

It was interesting before the Close Ups. The man's use of "Weathering" is bending my Dictionary over, without Consent. The moon doesn't have an alternate reality, and neither should this influencer.

What commercials?

Your a member but don’t have premium??

Premium when? Such a life changer.

@@user-eo7oh8px9e ... You're speaking English without a Dictionary?

March to the Moon has all of the Apollo photos in high resolution.

​@@Hobbes746..."High Resolution" ? ? ? Original Resolution? Unedited? "high resolution" for the 1960's, is what today?

​@@truthsRsung high resolution. Do you know how things work?

@@truthsRsung Apollo used Hasselblad medium-format cameras that created a 60x60 mm negative. March To the Moon has those negatives scanned at 12000x12000 pixels, i.e. 144 MP, about equal to the best digital cameras you can buy today.

There's a GOOD reason the "Apollo" missions just kind faded off with time.

At the top of the pops. 😊

Call me crazy but I think the MTV Moon landing was faked.

😂

It's a conspiracy !

😂😂😂

Like what??

😂

I have named them Pancreas and Spleen.

Sloping or slopping? I mean we've all occasionally slopped slightly beyond the rim but we're not rocket scientists after all...

He has been doing this for years now.

"Like" spending a half hour in an attempt to fool yourself. Yup. Just turn the picture over. Bahhahahahaaaa

@@truthsRsung?

@@robloxbot6004 ...Could you be more Lazy?

@@truthsRsung What

@@robloxbot6004 🥱

Here on Earth, our atmosphere makes everything far away look a bit blurry. Our brain uses this to estimate distances. Without an atmosphere, the human brain can’t estimate distances on the moon.

Wurk just fein with mey.

@@francoisleveille409…nah ‘Thons just fein wi me’ !-)

Dinna fash yersel'

@@dee_w784i'm in for it now

hahahaha

Ditto! Where it all began! 😊

Our great great grandchildren will visit the museum there.

@@Sashazur yeah it would be great if they put dome over the site to preserve it

I’d like to see the Apollo 15 site just to see Hadley Rille.

It’s like Calvin’s dad explaining why the world used to be in black & white.

@@Sashazur that sounds like an explanation right up my dad's alley (or in modern terms, part of his mind canon) To bad i never thought to ask about all the black and pictures and movies.

Kind of sad to poison a childs mind like that

​​@@koenwijnen8278 you must be a millennial to think such a thing would posion a child's mind. • How exactly would you describe what the moon is made of to a little child? • Do you also think it is poisoning a child's mind for them to watch cartoons or children's programing? • How about children having imaginary friends? I'm sure it will be amusing to hear your insight or lack there of on my questions. But don't worry my mind wasn't poisoned. I'm a retired medical professional. That means I'm college educated in the field of human anatomy, physiology and mental health. As well for hobbies I'm interested in astronomy, geology, phytomedicine. As I became an older child I felt rather grownup when I knew "grown-up" answers to my questions. The childhood answers became fond memories as I realized that as a little child the technical and scientific answers were beyond what a child should be burdened with.

⁠@@ussarng4649Don’t bother. You are a logical person using rational reasoning to explain something to someone who is neither logical nor rational. Also, it’s impossible to explain something with reason after they’ve been conditioned to respond to certain situations in an unreasonable, prepackaged way. I tend to call them socialist sheep.

World🌞Peace 🌎🌍🌏☯️⚡️ Much ❤️ Love

Why US?

This is like saying the video should be subtitled in Latin. It's not our fault you can't understand the units used by the majority of the world's population.

I dispute the "educated" modifier in your name if you walked away with "much." The man measured a few things while redefining sections of my Dictionary. Weathering, over, and Over. Just turn it upside down, you get a different perspective. Was that a NASA Secret? Turn the picture on its end. Did Ai come up with that? Marvelous, simply stunning, a feat of mankind. Holy Bologna

@@truthsRsung If you were a truly wise person you would know that no one understands anything right off the bat. No matter how educated someone is, people learn new things every day. This person put themself in a situation where they can learn something completely new, which is great. Bringing someone down for learning something they weren’t knowledgeable of before is just backwards.

@@sarahallen8739 ...They put a bunch of words together from a thesaurus, and managed to say Nothing Specific, just like the influencer that narrated this Video. The tone is defeatist as well, so I object TwoFold. It is perfume on poo, politicians on a Virus. I cracked on their name cuz more people needed to Look Harder at it. It might skew their judgement of the kind of Human that is ALL Flowers, Rainbows, and Unicorns. You can have your ideals, but I know the sound of dung being shoveled. Edited to Correct Autocorrect

.... You should look up what "hyperbole" means HINT: it's not synonymous with "vocabulary"

@@sarahallen8739 ...You are defending a monkey with a thesaurus. The sooner they learn that talking much and saying little keeps them from Listening and Learning, the better off we all are.

Obviously -- there are roads, buildings, airport -- Alex snuck-in an Earth city image to check who's watching closely. (I was gonna comment the same but figured I would check if someone already did first -- you beat me to it.) Alex :: which Earth city image did you toss in at this point? ☆☆☆☆

I'm supposing that is a superimposition of a city scape for scale. Otherwise it was a Big mistake!

Also at 17:59

Yeah clear as day but if it was meant for scale why didn't he say anything, is this a glimpse of his sense of humour ? Dunno...

@@andymouse It was introduced in one of the earlier videos. He said he'd do that for scale, but i guess it didn't really catch on.

for scale.

It looks like a city !!!

Same here. Its freaky.

There is a channel does that with high res photos zoomed. Can't remember name sorry.

look at 17.30 , what are all those roads and buildings? it's probably just superimposed.

@@InterdimensionalWiz 😆

I'm so glad I was not the only one.

A bit cringey lol. Aristarchus (eh-·ruh-staar-kuhs)...the Greek mathematician and astronomer that first noted our heliocentric solar system. He was the first to say that the Sun, NOT the Earth, was the center of our 'universe'.

Yes, his mispronunciations make me cringe. And don't even get me started on "a phenomena"! (It's a phenomenon, Alex).

@@leenorman853 Not in this video but even more common , “criteria” when the word should be “criterion”! 😭

Like idiocy

LOL…I feel that way about a lot of videos! Very good description!

Literal Lunatics

🤡😵‍💫😳

Don't make me laugh

if you are that stupid, we cant help you...

They could be tracks made by aliens who also had rovers.

WHEN AND WHERE DID YOU WITNESS THE TRACKS? LET ME GUESS, FROM A NASA CARTOON?

@@jordijorditch7444too stupid huh?

They did take photos of all the Apollo landing sites showing the landers and rovers and tracks. Shouldn't make assumptions without first checking.

They shot the Apollo sites in 2009 and again in 2011.

Watch the video.

You know, it really helps to watch a video before commenting about it.

The images are not very detailed though. Considering how close the LRO orbits and how good some of our cameras can be, I wonder why this is? If we can get license plate numbers from low earth orbit through an atmosphere, you’d think we could get better imagery on the moon.

You think Musk is running Nasa? I think you should give up your delusions of rationality.

Are you high? SpaceX does 10X more, for 10X less than anyone else. NASA has been wasting money like crazy on legacy companies like Boeing, or bureaucratic inertia.

There is no one going to pay you because you love science. Buck up Bobby.

@@TalibanSymphonyOrchestra What?

They are hiding a lot. They propably killed Cary Martynuik who made a lot of videos and a documantary about it with Jose Escamilla called Moon Rising 2. There is a reason why nearly all images are in black and white.

@@dAt3q Lol, Yes, there is a reason. No trees, NO lawns, NO air, No sky, no color. Just stark contrast and many shades of grey, or is that gray?

Who cares...

Evidence please for your claims. How come there material matches some pictures I get with my telescope?

One comment of sense in a big old circle jerk. I learned some new things about the moon that cause me to distrust basically everything. There is an atmosphere on the moon. The is water in the form of ice.. 6 billion metric tons of water. The earth and the moon are made up of different material - it is not likely that the formation of the moon happened the way it has been told

lol

Have you noticed the city structures, too? Strangely, the narrator didn't say anything about that... hmmm... I wonder why!