Did you even watch the video? More desert has been rejuvenated thousands of times over than some muddy water being dumped into the ocean.

@@TreyNitrotoluene yeah what good are natural rivers. The Earth exists to serve man. Duh

@@TreyNitrotoluene you mean the nutrient delivery system that is the life blood of the marine eco system?

@@TreyNitrotoluene You are too ignorant to benefit humanity.

​@@TreyNitrotoluene Accidents like these forests are a great and wonderful thing that humanity can learn from and hopefully duplicate with greater efficiency in the future. This is how I believe you and I understood Andrew's intention with making this video. I cannot believe anyone seriously thinks that lawns, swimming pools, and golf courses were the reasons for the river being redirected unless they genuinely hate humanity.

Now that the Colorado river is diverted, how about the ecosystem of end of the river near to the sea? Is it justifiable to sacrifice this for the sake of the consumer upstream? Human engineering feats mostly do harm to environment than good since profitability comes first before the ecology.

@@typical_watcher4599 An interesting factoid: all the water used by Arizonans from the Colorado River stays within the river basin and can be sent back to the river to go to the sea. This would assume that AZ would “use” less water, in a permanent sense, than it takes out of the river, which has become political rather than mathematical. California on the other hand has almost no usage of the river water within the basin and effectively permanently exits it with no opportunity to exit to the Sea of Cortez., yet they get the majority of water use rights. Things that make you go hmm!

Thanks

Thanks James

@@typical_watcher4599 "Human engineering feats mostly do harm to the environment than good [...good to the environment, that is] since profitability [...human benefit, you mean] comes before ecology [...another word for the environment]." Yes. The baby's bathwater serves the interests of the baby [It was not drawn from the faucet for the benefit of itself, but for the cleanliness of the baby]. Should it be the other way around? ...I mean, the very word "environment" means the surroundings or conditions in which something (the focus of one's attention or the center of one's value) lives. But, as an environmentalist ideologue, you really DO value the bathwater above the baby -- everything else surrounding human beings is valued more highly than the humans themselves. Now, what is the goal of "human engineering"? To shape nature for the benefit of human beings (and, in particular, THOSE humans who are paying for the engineering effort), ....yes? It's a matter of values. ....And the environmentalist pseudo-religion values EVERYTHING BUT the human beings.

Same time I got here. But the east valley had it's local water source. Water tested better than the Midwest. Mountain water. They don't call it snotsdale for nothing

Leaving shared assets to a monopoly creates an unaccountable mess know as "The Tragedy of the Commons". Private ownership works. Public doesn't. For proof, examine the waste of "public works" in every country, for millennia. It's been documented in history. Private roads and courts worked better, then govt. took over and people can't imagine it any other way. MSM is govt. propaganda, so you won't hear it there.

Republicans are going out of their way to specifically cut and sensor ecological education too. Can't burst the bubble of American meritocracy now. Got to keep up those appearances

Those people with green lawns came from places like Oregon, California, NY, etc. All that artificial green has increased the summer time humidity and all the asphalt and concrete has increased the city temperatures, especially the min temp at night.

​@thanhavictus The conditioned idiocy of blaming everything under the sun on Republicans is stunning. You'll believe any claim made about them without question.

But just not in a desert and water them in a water shortage....

I learnt this in school.

We did it for trial and now removing it

You are definitely a cool NERD!

We just discovered Flint... C’mon!

M'urca, most ain't happy unless you a spewing smoke and wasting resources.

Yes they can but the thing is canal in India is smaller as compared to this canal installing solar panel will cost them hell of a money, man hour and resources.

I've lived in AZ for many years. The vastness is incredible - as far as the eye can see in some places.

@@lileelisamc.4722 you’re not wrong also a native Arizonan here most of our land past the city isn’t usable because accessible water doesn’t reach that far yet

Yeah and it's an overcomplicated political waste, most of the land isn't even useful

Yea and for me as a Dutchman, Germany already feels huge😂

Wow I has no clue German's Diameter was soo small. Area wise it's quite big especially for a European nation. 500km seems small to me coming from absurdly vast Australia.

America, being an Empire, sees screwing over other nations for their own benefit as a positive outcome.

A Mexican river flows into the US full of bodies and 20 types of dangerous bacteria. I really don't care.

Mexico diverts a ton of water from the river too. They are part of the reason it doesn’t flow to the ocean

Mexicali is the last stop for the river. What makes it south of the border, they take in its entirety at that point.

​@mrepix8287 they divert nothing like the SW USA states and you know it.

That's tragic, but wetlands are so important

No body but dirty hippies care

They won't ever discuss that. It's another example of the thievery taking place every day.

And the we wonder why people leave their homes and migrate to other countries

But the Mexican population also uses and diverts that water. It's disingenuous to assume that they're not receiving any water due to the US.

I’m sure Mexico feels the same.

Nature's a real bitch.

@@ClumsyToast nature?

There is no gulf where the river went.

And now there's greenery in Arizona See how that works?

When covered wagons traveled the Oregon Trail, the Platte River had no trees along it at all. The volume of the river changed so much in the course of the year that trees could not root themselves--- washed out in high water and left high and dry in low water. Now that dams and dikes have stabilized the river, it is lined with cottonwoods the whole length.

No wonder, the money rule the world.

@Latricia Cagle AMEN to that! Maybe one day APS will stop blocking the need solar development. Every roof needs to be solar. It is amazing how much they will build roads everywhere, but neccessary 'green' projects are not "cost effective" (eyeroll)

@@jimmoses6617 as a native arizonan my most fond memories growing up were the days when it hardcore rained. seems like they get less and less common

It’s a crime that communities south of the border are lacking water because we have diverted the rivers resource to build cities in barren wasteland. That is is the travesty of American ingenuity and innovation that he’s intentionally skipping over in his overview. This man made water shortage has devastated ecosystems and communities of people alike south of the border.

And the crazy part is alot of the water down stream that disappeared was vital to native reservations that the government then relocated them to land with water and sold the land for mining to the highest bidder.

But how else are they gonna have green lawns and golf courses?

Sadly, rich people that bought land cheap because it was desert use their influence to move the river and 'develop' those areas, everybody thought it was a win win for everybody excluding the mexicans. But sadly, that is still a desert area, eventually the desert is going to win.

Definitely! Great idea.

Trees can provide shade along the canal and keeps the water intact in their roots and soil not the solar panels.

@@amillison Solar panels over canals is a major undertaking in India. They both reduce evaporation and provide power without using agricultural land. BTW, do you know about the Paani Project? They seem to have made major changes in water retention and increasing agricultural yield. As the climate continues to warm, when it does rain it's likely to rain in larger quantities. It might be time to start working on water runoff in the US in a serious way.

@@bobwallace9753 ukposts.info/have/v-deo/ZWifpaSGmqV90nk.html

@@parullgossain Thanks. Had already watched (and uprated) that video. Didn't realize they were done by the same person.

He didn't mention that the areas downhill from the canal are, conversely, starved of the water that couldn't get through the berms.

Exactly what I was thinking. There's no such thing as a free lunch. That water is coming from somewhere, the water making these "forests" was originally going somewhere else. So you haven't really gained a forest, you just moved it. The guy also refers to water "lost" to evaporation like it no longer exists... where do you think it's going? Overall an interesting video but I'm skeptical of the point it's trying to make.

@@decidiousrex yeah I have to agree with you. He’s basically talking out of both sides of his mouth saying that it’s a good thing but yet it’s a bad thing and yada yada yada and it makes no sense because he’s contradicting himself is how I’m understanding this. So what is the point he’s trying to get at???……

Such considerations, however, presuppose rudimentary stages of intelligence - unlikely in environmental issues in the United States.

@@donfredo8013 So what do you purpose? If everything done to the environment for the sake of water was turned back to how it was 100+ years ago, there wouldn’t be water for Los Angeles & for Phoenix & Tucson…. Sure many more cities. Perhaps you’re in line with Bill Gates in thinning out the world population?

@@donfredo8013 Honey, don’t. Just speak. Don’t do all that, nobody cares.

I think it is better to have enough water on one side to support life and the other side be baron, rather than have neither side have enough water.

The water sink above the canal will provide more groundwater for the land below the canal.

Task failed successfully

The soil here gets a crust on it from baking in the sun and most of the water runs off anyway, at least initially. You're right about less surface water but to second Kitti, there will be more local groundwater. Given our heat, groundwater is better. What you're seeing on the dry side isn't uncommon as far as density of plants. Pretty healthy population, actually. On the fauna side, it can be like night and day. Everything from birds to lizards to rabbits to horses will gravitate to that big greenery, dozens of species, especially if there's standing water under the trees. It can be like being at the zoo.

Actually, there’s a spillway over the canal, so the water pools on both sides. It’s shown at 6:06.

Small world! Thank you so much for the kind feedback, it's always great to hear how this knowledge is circulating :-)

I love this guy.

@@edithmaggie Thanks! I've been thinking & doing some research on this. I've come up with a huge megaproject for capturing water using swailes as filtered drains.

Thus us just the beginning. There's so much more.

it only takes 5 minutes of surfing youtube to realize the majority of commenters are over-opinionated imbeciles. no worries, man, don't let it get to you.

what you said, is what you wrote and hence as expected people reacted to your obvious error.

@@grantandrew619 Why the hell would anybody be negative in their reaction after watching this piece of knowledge?! What’s obvious is your dumbness. @Creator Thank you for this amazing video. I’m from a country with desert/water issues, i think my government can use this kind of solution to change the game completely.

#1 is for idiots who dont know how to think

you should change the description to reflect these numbers. you also need to correct the lake pleasant evaporation number you threw out. you also don't mention that youre ignoring seepage "losses". probably should make another video just digging into the numbers and get them right, if you can't change this video. i would say 4-5% system loss from CAP is pretty good. (you act like it's wasteful.) and most of that lost from lake pleasant. but we don't have any context here, if there are even better aquaduct systems out there. and we also don't see the losses from lake powell and the rest of the colorado's parasites. mollison's global gardener desert video was very moving to me when i first saw it. but having moved to the mojave and having travelled and lived in the sonoran for months around tucson and arizona generally, i found that it contains three major lies. 1) these embankment swales are useful and interesting, but they rob as much water downstream as they impound upstream. the swales he visited west of tucson are neat but definitely not an obvious model to copy. 2) dixon's imprinting method may work in marana, but it hasn't worked anywhere else i've been. 3) mollison claimed the saguaros in his video were the last of their kind -- no more canopy under which new babies could begin. he was flat wrong on that, and it's a big mistake for him to make, as a botanist. knowyourwaternews.com/3-facts-of-cap-efficiency-seepage-and-evaporation/

It is drying up and is at record lows. It is literally just a trickle now.

At least Phoenix has super important golf courses.

Where this river ends used to have flowers bloom every year before we as a species decided to divert it for our own needs in a desert. The green lawns should be outlawed in the US. They take so much water and chemicals to upkeep. If I ever get to own a home, I am letting it turn into flowers and sedges to help the critters more then I need a lawn.

@@notright7 Plenty of water in the US. You just have to live where it is. lol. You choose to live in a desert that's the price you pay.

@@notright7 Surely you will.

Right, & simps like this tell these false positive stories about how wonderful an accident this was, while never saying anything about how much damage it has caused in other regions & areas. Then you end up with massive populations living & working in that area so it then becomes basically impossible to ever get anything reversed. Its like all the farmers in Cali where most of those crops would never grow. Pistachio & almond farms alone if stopped would give back so much water Cali would have surplus & no longer face all the water shortages. But now these companies that own the farms lobby & buy the politicians that get elected so rather than move their operations to states where natural rainfall would give them enough water, they just continue destroying. & again, overly simple videos like this sell a story that is not only inaccurate, but indescribably damaging for the long-term.

Just because its natural, doesn't mean it was good to begin with. Remember, nature I not intentional, it' all happenstance.

@@MeloncholyKay I get that, but what end up happening is you have a large population form around the natural resources that nature made & the ecosystem is stable (more or less bare with me please), but people end up diverting say 10% of the water because we as humans think oh 10% thats nothing everything will be fine. Then the water levels plummet, plant species start to die off, animals & even bugs move or slowly die off. All because simp humans thought oh its only 10%, the entire ecosystems collapse it many cases because of humans thinking they can play God. & I mentioned before, but it is a slow process over decades, maybe 100 years, so new large populations form like in the case of some Arizona cities. Its not to say people can't move where they want, but that diversion does more harm than good. Humans always underestimate the damage they cause, & politicians who get paid under the table hush money to pass those bills & policies honestly dont care at all.

Just look what happened to the Aral Sea in Central Asia, for the same reasons. It used to be the fourth largest lake in the world, but then the Amu Darya and Syr Darya rivers were diverted for irrigation projects. The former lakebed is a dust bowl now, only a relatively small pool of water in the north survives.

@@fruzsimih7214 i dont think the pacific ocean will dry up

Green lawns in the Phoenix area are the minority and we have water here.

I'm in Kentucky and have replaced over half my lawn with gardens. I think lawns should be banned everywhere. They are ecological deserts.

@@everythingmatters6308 only over half your lawn? Tisk tisk

@@cesarcueto1995 Still digging for three hours today. It's a double lot. I'll get there!

@@everythingmatters6308 you're right. Good on you, mate. Sorry for being unfairly tough on you

Are lawns practical in a desert environment where water is scarce? You can get away with it if you only have a small population, but AZ's population has grown to the point where it may no longer be sustainable.

@@jonathantan2469 No, they are not and I am glad to see the lawns go. Much more will be needed to allocate available water and to lower demand for this increasingly scarce resource.

It should be illegal to have a lawn..

Lawns here in the valley are silly and a pointless waste of water. If people want to grow things here at least choose native plants or useful ones, like food producing. I think there should be a ban on lawns and private pools. Private pools are a waste or space and water. Most people don’t use their private pools enough to justify their existence. We would be better served by adding more community pools.

@@luckyfeatherfarm4685 Yea I can understand why they want a swimmingpool. But it certainly don't need to be filled with freshwater, certainly not in a desert where water is scarce. Weird that no one has started an establishment which transports and sell seawater instead. For one person the cost would be huge, but together it could be viable and a much better alternative.

Can't fault him for that.... it is good to spend time with dads.

Yes! They could put swales at interval throughout the entire landscape. The optimum interval would depend on slope and the ground type of the catchment area.

@@amillison I would argue also the rainfall plays a role. In the end swales are places where precipitation accumulates, so in a very dry climate you need a large catchment area (i.e. large distance between swales) for putting together a significant amount of water.

@@nicolagiuliani3212 Yes. So you'd have to determine the optimum interval based on rainfall, slope, and ground coverage (runoff coefficient). Another important piece is the timing and intensity of rainfall. The monsoons are a big runoff event because the rain is so intense.

Yes. It would be a good idea across most of AZ, would greatly green desert, and might even be implemented, if bureaucrats were not 1) morons and 2) controlled by corps.

Nope

I definitely agree that this little grove is hardly a forrest but I'm used to NY where we just barely don't qualify as having a rainforest in the taiga of the ADKs. Left alone any given piece of land will go from bare dirt to dense forrest in about 30years around here. (Passing through the stages of grass covered, bramble covered, slash covered, and finally tree covered.) We also have beavers who naturally build swales and "rainwater harvesting structures" for us and it seems like many places could use these helpful if destructive rodents. (Assuming they wouldn't have worse ecological impacts as an invasive species)

@@jasonreed7522 Beavers are extremely destructive in Argentina where they have been introduced, but in semi-deserts they are a must. my area has surprisingly few beavers since the rivers are quite powerful in many places. They tend to be around the coast or smaller tributaries in flatter areas since their dams get swept away otherwise.

@@Exquailibur i can see that, beavers are very adept at changing their environment so in an area where they don't belong and have no predators the environmental changes could definitely be much more negative than positive. As far as where they live, they don't bother with actual rivers (order of 10-20 feet or 3-6 meters wide), they need the little streams of only a couple feet wide and a few inches deep to start building a pond. They also prefer to dam up flat ground since it makes a wider pond for less dam building effort. And in an environment that is used to them like the forrests of Northern North America they are invaluable since they massively improve water storage and quality and provide habitat with their ponds. Beavers make sense to restore to forrests where they used to live but were hunted to extinction by humans, but as a fully introduced species we must exercise great caution to avoid making problems worse with unintended consequences. (Look up the cobra effect for a laundry list of times were kept intentionally introducing animals and it kept making things worse before finally just having to capture or kill everything that didn't belong ourselves.)

@@jasonreed7522 What you have said about beaver preferences explains a lot about their distribution in the pacific northwest. Though due to the rainfall in my region averaging around 70-100 inches per year (depending on proximity to the coast and mountains) the drought resistance isnt what they are important for. They create ponds and lakes that otherwise dont naturally form which is an important habitat for a number of plants and animals. without beavers, the biodiversity would be much lower and several would go extinct due to their small ranges and low adaptability. The Olympic mudminnow is a species that comes to mind when i think of something that relies so heavily on habitat created by beavers or the few valleys that can form oxbow lakes.

Reminded me of one of my deployments to Afghanistan. The Afghan soldiers said we were going to the "jungle". I have more trees in my back yard than they had in their "jungle".

“This VAST forest” - cuts to a mesquite tree and some bushes. I suppose in the desert maybe that is a forest idk

I live here in the AZ Sonora (5yrs), and I've lived in WA and OR (for a decade). You're basically right: this is called *scrubland.* If saguaros move in _then_ it's a forest; the wildlife needs them, that's why this video is suspiciously dead and quiet. After the Saguaros get started it will take them upwards of half a century to get tall. Cholla, ocotillo and other cacti, like barrel cactus, are also important to make it a true forest that can actually support a diverse food-web. The point of showing this soil is that it's dark and fertile; not moist! Andrew should have compared it to the pale, barren gravel away from any trees. When a saguaro forest is healthy it can be LOUD, even in November, with cactus wrens and woodpeckers going nonstop. Many birds winter here, just a few dozen miles from of this footage, in the _actual_ Tonto Nat Forest - out my backdoor. It's just like in the PNW, where a deforested area can't balance out until the big conifers are reestablished, because the intermediate deciduous trees just can't support the potential diversity. What I see in this vid, and nearly anywhere near the canal, is the valley floor only just beginning to recover from its construction. We have lovely, if unconventional, forests in The Sonora - but this ain't it chief.

Youd have to live there awhile to think "forest" your expectations begin to suffer reality. Much like they consider a dry sand bed a river because every once in a while, water trickles down it for a week or two.

@@Vladviking No dude that's the point, the video plays it up as a forest, as someone who's "lived here awhile" it's just not. Guy in the video is maybe from OR? He has no idea. If you think Arizonans don't know what a river is and call "a dry sand bed a river" then you're really shining your ignorance.

It's so important! Thanks for watching. :)

Yes absolutely

These two guys teach classes together for Oregon State. They know each other well I'm sure.

Thanks for the tip! He's made some excellent video's. Greetings from the Netherlands

That’s because the citizens of Tucson recognize that they live in a desert area with seasonal rains. Their brethren in Phoenix believe they’re living in an Oasis (they’re not) and treat water like a birthright… just saying.

@@DanielinLaTuna Wilcox is 1 hr 14 min (82.8 mi) via I-10 E away from Tucson. Both Tucson and Phoenix are irrelevant to this discussion. Nonetheless, rainwater harvesting should be done everywhere - especially in arid areas.

This is beyond horrible.

Man, that sucks so much! Alfalfa is actually a good crop to grow in arid climates, but one should not feed an overwhelming amount of cattle with it. Get a small herd of goats or sheep and you're good.

I've been to Wilcox. I actually took a permaculture course near Sunizona in the 90's. Although looking a the satellite now, it looks like the center pivot irrigation circles have blown up big time since I was there. That's a shame!

@@amillisonHowdy. I used to live outside Sunsites...built the first ultra-tiny strawbale house in Cochise county, and it is still standing there, right on Treasure Road. Now am in WI, where was finally able to implement food forest without it being decimated by wildlife, cutter bees, and giant grasshoppers.

@@keralee 👍very cool.

So what happened to the Mexican people who were living in Mexico at the end of the Colorado river.? Did they get any compensation?

💔

@@jan22150 fuck no. What do you think?

@@jan22150 crossed the border to El Norte

@@willbass2869 most of the Mexican people living in that area are of Native American decent.....Just more fall out of the greed of the white man since they invaded North America.

That was what I remember. The cpa came later and is feeding the need for expansion.

@@smiley3012 It's largely feeding agriculture.

As far as I know Tucson and that area of our state gets srp and over west where I'm at (little town called surprise, maybe not so small anymore) right at the base of the white tank mountains we use cap

@@satanbirmingham911 Tucson doesn't receive any water from the Salt River Project. Tucson's water comes from the CAP, groundwater and treated waste water.

Having green lawns in Arizona is so wrong

I grew up ranching in Arizona. We’re trying to fix that. Every rancher is. That was a bold claim to make. We didn’t destroy it. Construction and suck destroyed it. Check your facts. Speaking of which, this is filmed on our ranch.

@@chadbloomfield6068 ... which was, only several decades ago, native Indian territory. Ironic, no ?

@@chadbloomfield6068 then I'm sure you know about Willcox, where big ranchers are destroying the city.

I’m curious if by building the dams, allowing pools of water to penetrate into the ground more than moving water, this is “conserving” water? I’m just trying to ascertain how you interpret “conserving” in this case. If it’s in the same thinking of “saving for the future,” there are aspects of the CAP system that do recharge aquifers, less naturally & with a lot more energy & less ecological benefit than beaver dams. FYI, conserving is also commonly interpreted in the same way as the other meaning of save, which is to use less; we can thank American English for such communication challenges LOL!

They looked dead because they were a native or desert species that go dormant when they don't have enough water to sustain the leaf growth. Once they have some water they will revive until the next dry spell and go dormant again.

@@patzeuner8385 they’re poplar trees, not native desert species

@@acesoftrul3z you do know there numerous members of the poplar species. Since I'm not in the area to confirm what species have started to naturally inhabit the area. Since the trees were not planted by humans then it can be assumed that plants and trees are indigenous to the area and the seeds for said plants would most likely be spread by wind, water, or animals. From the aerial video it appears that there may be scrub oak and maybe a type of pinion or mesquite, also growing in the area. Non native species would have a hard time to adapt to the dry climate without human intervention.

@@patzeuner8385 buddy… what? They’re trees that someone planted like 20 years ago. They didn’t grow here naturally. I’m not talking about wild trees or the juniper/pines that occur natively in the area. These are non native trees that somebody planted then stopped caring for at some point

@@acesoftrul3z I don't believe the report said that humans had planted non native trees but rather nature doing her thing.

@@donofon101 India reported they had great success with that. I'm not an US resident, so someone else will have to step in.

The idea itself is of zero value to politcians so it will go nowhere. Only green in their palms will move an idea into reality

Recycled plastic fiber optics like a car wash .ECT ECT .thx yep

Exactly my thought, even a simple cheap cover would save massive water

Works even better to rust all electronics too 🤣

You couldn't find a square mile of open land here in Delaware to ride lol, very jealous

@@Shaymuhs it's basically impossible not to find big open spaces in the western states, even California lol

ur welcome 😇 thanks

It could always have its day, like Detroit did, or The Salton Sea.

Indeed but you can't tell America most of their infrastructure inefficient asinine and poorly planned. They'll work with what they have... If you wanted sensibility you'd have to scrap whole states. They'll just keep expanding (as looming bankruptcy demands) till the whole thing collapses onto itself.

the water would end up in the ocean anyway

@@DevinDTV And the nutrients that it used to bring with it.

ABSOLUTELY VILE.

That is correct. Many of the canals used today were built by Hohokam's and you can still see them from google maps.

You would so hate it now.🙁

Its the reason why Phoenix is called Phoenix. According to legend when a Phoenix dies it is reborn from its own ashes. Phoenix is a settlement reborn from the ashes of the native american settlement that came before

@@sonacphotos If China is planning on doing something, it's likely to have disastrous ecological impact lol Seems like every time they try something new it destroys the ecosystem due to poor planning and oversight.

@@sonacphotos it's really not. Even a quick cursory glance into their water development projects and you'll see the disastrous impacts they've had on the region. Drying up rivers in important cities due to their water transfer, and ravaging local wildlife populations. Not new to China either, going all the way back to the Communist take over and there's a pattern of ecological disasters from poor planning.

@@LetsShitPost honestly i think they are just replanting trees in the desert areas to reclaim the land lost due to excessive logging during mao's rule. dude made so many bad decisions holy shit

have you even been to arizona? have you even thought about what it would take to try growing a forest in 120F+ summers in a state that has no natural water sources of their own and shit soil thats basically some sand mixed with lava rock boulders.

@@pawn3d167 its really because they're getting political pressure from all the other countries that are affected by the dust haze created by the gobi during monsoon seasonf

I agree. Rivers should be rivers, not damned. Humans should not be diverting rivers to grow crops or live in the desert. It is unsustainable.

Yep and the people south of all this get screwed. I find it very irresponsible. In Yuma the river is basically nothing. At least last time I was there.

@@martensdcm Beavers would not appreciate that statement. Dams aren't the problem, it's the overusage of water that's the real issue. We need more desalination plants so rivers (and dams) can do what they're meant to do.

@@ungoyone I see your point. It makes sense.

@@ungoyone However, the dams beavers make are nothing compared to manmade dams, that divert huge quantities of water.

A good amount? It rains here 15 days out if the year

He said good amount for a desert, which is a statement based on perception. 2021 was the third wettest year in AZ due to heavy monsoon season.

@@gucciflipflop6669 ...for a desert. Look at pictures of the Atacama or Sahara and then look at pictures of the Sonora desert and see the vegetation difference. National Geographic called it the "lushest desert in the world". I didn't say it was Seattle.

I love how he just glossed over the fact that the US use up so much of the water, that the Mexico literally doesnt get any. I wonder how Mexico sees this amazing feat of engineering and agriculture.

Vegas only uses 2% of the water out of Lake Mead they actually have a really good water conservation program there so much so that people from Dubai come to study it. It's mostly wasted on agriculture in California and Arizona.

@@schizomode Mostly in California. Most of the Colorado River water goes to California to feed all the agricultural activities they have going on in SoCal / Coachella Valley. Almond trees are THIRSTY.

LA is where the water goes and they shouldn't get any until they permit some desalination plants. Not only that they waste a lot of water by the way it is managed

Las Vegas uses less than Arizona and California . FYI.

The project is stealing all the water from the communities downstream while Arizonans water their golf courses and wash their cars with it.

Not unless you first manage the water. Trees are naturally plantedby animals and wind, will grow if there is adequate moisture and soil fertility....which is created via lumpy texture--pits and swales that retain both water and nutrients. Build those and the trees come on own.

@@keralee The reforestation of deserts is a complex. I think that it is necessary to fence the plots to be regreened because the herbivores create the deserts without the predators to regulate them... It is not necessary to plant trees but to let the seeds of trees germinate on the ground... Then, it is necessary to water during 2 or 3 years until the trees become autonomous in water...

@ユジン Thank you for all this information ...

The Nature Conservancy has had good success restoring stream flow in Arizona. I reckon each stream is different and needs its own plan. Streams can regrow rapidly if there's not too many cows on the banks.

@@nmarbletoe8210 Yes, I agree .... Often all you need to do is put up a fence and you can see a desert greening up. We don't measure enough the damage of grazing by herbivores...

Regenerative Agriculture is the long-term key to recovering these deserts - Allan Savory, Greg Judy and many others are involved in projects that work on any continent (except Antarctica). Lego projects like this are hiding the politicians from solutions.

It's NOT a forest! Just bushes and stunted trees.

@@golden.lights.twinkle2329 well this changes my whole life trajectory. Thank you. Your wisdom is unparalleled.

I always said the Sonoran desert is the most alive place I've ever been. You didn't mention coyotes, cottontail and jack rabbits.

Grasshoppers, lizards, geckoes, praying mantis, ants, beetles, butterflies - have them all in my garden.

The figures I'm seeing suggest that the Phoenix aquifers have ~85m acre-feet (not all of it recoverable). That's less than 40 years of Phoenix usage (2.3m acre-feet annually). I would be curious to see sources suggesting 300 years.

@@fuzzzone ukposts.info/have/v-deo/fniUfWOAral0k4k.html

@Craig There is a great book about the Powell expedition down the Colorado River that actually began on the Green River up in Wyoming. It is an intersting read. The book is called, 'Down the Great Unknown - John Wesley Powell's 1869 Journey of Discovery and Tragedy Through the Grand Canyon' by Edward Dolnick

I remember when basically everything ended around Chandler Blvd and beyond it was dirt roads and farms. Until you hit that once little community of Ocotillo. Heck, i remember when the 60 ended in AJ and you had to get onto that Old West Highway to continue east. Just crazy how much Phoenix has expanded in pretty much every direction. Wonder how long until it connects to Tucson...

@@actionvestadventure Bell road was North Phoenix, Scottsdale Road north of Camelback had nothing, 75th Ave was about as far west as you cared to venture. From South mountain at night you could see all the communities separated by darkness....now one big sprawl. On the weekends you better have the turnoff to Saguaro Lake in your rear view mirror around 3PM so you could get a premium spot on the Rim. You were SOL if you got behind campers or trucks puling them on the road because they had carburetors and not fuel injection. Interstate 10 was not connected to I-40, the MAYO Clinic was in the middle of nowhere as well as Rietta Pass....oh those beautiful days! I have traveled a lot of places and so far the absolute most boring drive have been between Phoenix and Tucson...are we there yet‽‽

Roads and parking lots are a source for heat.

CAGRD disagrees with you