Oil companies are not going to come after someone who built inefficient backyard AC inverter that runs on 12 volts, when you can buy much more efficient AC inverter that runs on 12 volts at Wal Mart.

@@Hapasan808 Wow, are indefinite articles not a thing for you?

@@Hapasan808 You know what happened to the last guy who built a water car?

Bro this why we’re scared to speak the truth cuz people like you keep this stupid paradigm that if we speak truth we automatically get killed🤦🏽‍♂️🤦🏽‍♂️ bro u ain’t helping at all 🤦🏽‍♂️🤦🏽‍♂️

@@soeren8652 I know still people who builds them and are alive. If they come in a news, they will get fkd :D

How about charging the battery with an alternator.??

@@faustojoselopez2656 uhmmmm did you just discover free energy before everyone else?

@@faustojoselopez2656 Alternators are not that efficient. Even if we assumed the rest of the setup is (which it isn't). The alternator would take more power from the engine than it makes, so the battery will still run dead. These small engines usually don't have an alternator. They have a magnet on the flywheel that passes by a nearby coil to produce a small charge current, just enough to power the ignition and recharge what the starter took out of the battery. 2 Ampere max if I recall.

@@plonkster The energy is in the Hydrogen. This is not new. In the 70’s Meyer drove from LA to NY in a tank of water. He died soon after. It is a dangerous undertaking pardon the pun.

@@faustojoselopez2656 Actually no. The energy is not so much in the hydrogen as it is in the reaction between hydrogen and oxygen. A certain amount of measurable energy is released when you let those two react. But in order to get the hydrogen, you need energy to split them. The process only works if you get more energy out than you put in... and that's the one thing that has not been shown, in fact it downright contradicts everything we know about physics. That doesn't mean it is wrong (well, it probably does, but I mean on a philosophical level it would not), it just means you need to prove your results very very meticulously. Even if there was no tomfoolery in this video -- which I doubt -- that engine is still not making enough electrical energy to recharge that small 18Ah battery. Which means the entire process essentially runs from the small 12V battery...

Impossible. Process when H atoms pulled out of H2O molecules, it changes water into gas. This technology will leave far future generations without water. Literally. This must be stopped.

Nice I need one

All that means, is that the battery output (temporarily) is capable of supplying more gas than the engine needs. As the battery slowly depletes its charge (despite some charge from the engine's charger) the gas level will rise to liquid.

Yeah. Doesn't even consume water. It runs on the energy of hopes and dreams! =)

@@billkichman7770 yes if it took a gallon of gas to go 10 ft i suppose you could say the same thing for a gas engine. the efficiency is what is key here. We are using water to get (more miles per kw) in a sense which is why the water engine is becoming more practical.

Awesome! Congratulations for reaching that goal!

Totally run or hydrogen gas really

@@asifyousfi2783 no, diesel still used combined with hydrogen. The difference is I got twice the milage out one tank of diesel with hydrogen fed in to the air intake from the hydro generator powered by the battery. Diesel waste non existent expelled out of the exhaust. The vehicle only used the diesel it needed. The engine ran much smoother as well like a petrol engine. Very clean combustion.

so, where can I get some of the critical components? I know Potassium Hydroxide has been used as an electrolyte, but I dont know if this one has been doped with anything special. Im looking to build my own for our 3 cars, If you have any pointers you are willing to give, I would appreciate it.

@@samjohnson3124 hardware store has it all, or buy a ready made kit. USA have them ready plug and play for around $400

female talking about technology xd

Depends on the engine.

Stationary engines, no mass to move, just a small piston, look promising BUT the World longs for the ICE replacement. Thus the EV evolution. But we hav GAS Cars now, LPG & Hydrogen cars. So let's take a look. U bubble a little hydrogen thru a bank of 1, 2, 5L 'generators' feed thru a modified carby & off u go. So what's producing the energy to break down the water? Yep that's an embarrassing Q. Next let's look at a working existing H. car. Large tanks under enough pressure to turn H. into liquid and then run for about 1 std tank of petrol, say 500k. Typically 2 or 3 tanks. How much pressure? north of 500 atmospheres. So a bank of bubbling H. gas generators moves a 1 ton car, just like the commercial H. gas tanks. AND Big Auto has hidden, lied to, killed to stop these bubble makers going commercial in small to mid sized vehicles ?? Bless ur '24

I am sure, they just use Wodka or something else that looks like Water.

​@@davidsmith3736 Unfortunately depends on the math and physic. And both are non compromise. Output energy is input energy times efficiency. Nothing else. So easy it is.

Also me

Same here

Same

yes

me

I have not studied this and have no experience in it I am just wondering how it breaks this rule? Thanks

I agree with the comment above and am wondering how it breaks the rules

@@friendless3768 He's being sarcastic. Of course it doesn't break the 1st law of thermodynamics it's just being very inefficient since he could just use the battery instead to power his angle grinder.

@@friendless3768 It takes more energy to split water into hydrogen and oxygen than you get back by burning the hydrogen.

Yeah, they put together an arrangement with 2 things going at once, one adding to the system, one depleting, with a small difference being the loss in efficiency, that stretches the observed result out in time that it satisfies the con.

Load testing the generator has no bearing on the functionality of the gas motor driving it. The question is “How long with that container of water continue to produce hydrogen?”

He hasn't removed the possibility of this system running from battery power in such short tests. I'm not saying it is or isn't, just would be nice to see and know 7AF

Never de rust it. The corrosion layer protects metal underneath! That goes for EVERYTHING!

@@tarheelcountry1868 Well i would love to try this and see how much power ya get for what it puts out with fuel, if i find a generator to use, i might run some long power tests and see what i get

OKAY, you know so much about how Stanley did it, build one.

Uhh..WRONG. He used a pulsed DC….His way was with resonance. Stick your hand INTO Meyers demo units and you would die if it was not pulsed DC.

@@johnhamilton9098 So who are you sending your comments to, me or Klay because I know that you have to run DC through the HHO.??

@@Ken-rk3by Why do you have to run DC? The principle stays the same, especially if your anode and cathode are the same material. I think. Drop an extension cord in a bucket. It makes bubbles. Though that might be from boiling which is different. Electronics guy needed in aisle 5. In general the output would be less because it's not using constant peak voltage. If the frequency makes up for that I don't know.

@@charlidog2 -- If you use AC current all the plates on both sides would be trying to form hydrogen and oxygen at the same time and apparently, it won't work. Besides, you would have to have an inverter to supply AC in a vehicle putting even more strain on the charging system than just running DC. The other problem would be keeping it cool, in essence, you just made a kettle. Also, the chances of arcing between the plates, if it did produce HHO gas it would make it too dangerous to be near it

His head in 24 hours 🤯

yeh i found a story about a guy created a waterpowered car and was killed

2.2 milion people gonna die

@@p.p.a.p762 exactly!

Download the video so there is still evidence left

ok, and?

@@gugomajo4161 Just so that he doesn't mysteriously disappear because of him making an actual way to be powered by water. Just look at Stanley Meyer.

Stay Halal brother 🙏

100% agreed. What I don’t understand why he spends so much time and efforts for such a BS……

It would be impossible if the splitting of water took the amount of energy that it is thought. But Stan Meyer many years ago showed it could be split with far less energy than thought.

Ils savent déjà ça depuis longtemps, mais ce serait faire tomber l'économie mondiale

@@holgerkirschbaum6911 Maybe you aren't paying 8 dollars per gallon of gasoline.

@@paulbriggs3072 Stanley used harmonics/frequency to split the bonds. Something nobody is doing.

An fire arrestor is needed because hydrogen is highly explosive, increasing the chances of an explosion.

Better off using a battery

And we provide free gas after eating beans!

Mine is however sometimes demands a lot of alcohol with water😭😭😭😭

I failed the emissions test!

Nothing like snorting coke to get me going

helps with the combination @@vivekawasthi4808

Yes, the corrosion looks like a potential problem in the long term. I think the problem here were the corks, but we should definitely look for ceramics.

Dear Guys, good show. Yes 50 years ago i also learnt the electrolysis of water. A massive bang in the science lab. Ok. You example is a 4 stroke petroleum engine. My question to you is. Would the HHO system work on a diesel engine that has been converted to natural gas.? Kind regards. Bill.

lpg, is the go.. my bronco been on lpg for 14 yrs. 12.1 compression, timing, goes like a cut cat..

@@HiddenTechnology_ You should sell that device online!! Trades people would love it!! Some people would be able to use it for there cars!! You should sell a plan! A how to build one yourself guide!! Maybe even a kit with instructions/warnings. So people could buy the kit & build one themselves!! So even more people could afford to have this technology!! Thank you.

@@zachsheffee8458 absolutely right

same

Me too, I knew this was a thing already i cars.

Hydrogen is the smallest element on the periodic table, and is nigh impossible to contain. I don't understand why so many people get all up in a bunch, interested in using hydrogen for engines. It isn't a fuel so much as it's a fuel can. And a leaky one at that.

​​@@billkichman7770 Maybe because we are burning all the petrol avaible in crappy "Wish" furniture and that we need to find alternative solutions. Hydrogen will never run out as you mentioned it is the simplest atom. and that running engines with a basic water electrolysis is so simple that just any college student could make it safely ?

​@@billkichman7770 It's interesting because the raw materials for getting hydrogen are readily available, the methods are pretty straightforward and the oxidation products are harmless. We are having trouble storing excess electricity, so of course people look to water electrolysis. As you said, it also offers major complications, but you can't blame people for being interested. This video, however, is just plain silliness. Why would anyone want to use a battery to power water electrolysis that will be immediately oxydized is beyond me.

@@gonzaloayalaibarre "This video, however, is just plain silliness. Why would anyone want to use a battery to power water electrolysis that will be immediately oxydized is beyond me." When you don't have an electric engine available, this is a less efficient alternative I guess...

@@billkichman7770 i guess the hindenburg never existed then

study proton water exchange membrane water electrolysis process you will know more about what he did

this actualy works in reallife too, the BIG problem is, that the hydrogen eats away the oilfilm in the pistons and that the engine cant run for a longer time in this conditions. ford actualy tested this for a long time, and they find it easyer to just use fuelcells.

Hydrolisis increases entropy, so this isnt a perpetual motionmachine

Exactly. The efficiencies multiply, to total lower values. Maybe 0.85 for the generator x 0.3 for the dirty engine, x 0.9 battery charging, x whatever the hydrolysis is...very low number in the end.

Hey David, So can you explain to me what process you’d have to take to keep using the water, please? You sound like you know what your talking about and this video, although amazing, doesn’t explain what he is doing and what process he is taking to get energy output from simple H2O for people that don’t know what he is doing, like me lol. So would you have to run gas, charge the battery, then run water to save gas until the battery runs out, then run gas again? I am a super lay person in this regard. Could at the very least this process save you on gas or is using water to power a generator just wishful thinking? Also, why is that water turning red in that chamber? It was just water with like salt or something wasn’t it? In the left chamber.

Instead of electrolysis, use ionization PWM with water spray (car ignition with PWM on the 12 VDC side and water through a carburator). 10kV, 3 kHz.

From what I can tell, all water engines need a second input to work. Wether that be sodium, some type of chemical, heat, all that, anything that works doesn't use just water alone. A gas engine takes a small amount of electricity and then continues on by itself making up that loss of electricity. The challenge here is basicaly how to get a water engine that does the same. Now why we don't just have hydrogen based engines and facilities that make hydrogen and replace the gas at gas stations I have no idea. It would be the single most easy way to switch to a more renewable form of energy other than electric.

Don’t underestimate it so quickly, with time, this will possibly be one of the greatest inventions of mankind. So what if it’s only 30% efficiency, the first computers were the size of rooms, now they fit in your hand.

its not just a bit of theater, his videos gets pushed up the ladder and he get monotised

or likes. or subscriptions. or the money that comes from that.

so you're saying it's not real? Why don't you build one and prove it?

@@redpillfitness1 It doesnt work on the bases of physics alone. The energy required to for electrolysis is less than you would get from the hydrogen made, its a system that is always losing energy, and since the only energy input is the battery, its basically a joke of a video

He is actually earning money with this theater lol.

That's my takeaway here as well. The engineering is impressive but the fuel source is the HH+ added in. Also, the longevity is questionable given the rods corroding at the start.

@@axel708 The resulting corroded sludge in the electrolysis chamber is very toxic. It produces hexavalent chromate, which must be disposed of at designated hazardous waste sites - there are severe penalites for not disposing of it properly. Not to mention it causes severe skin reactions, and evtually cancer. I do not think this is a good trade-off for petrol by any stretch.

@@DonoVideoProductions can you expand on this whole sludge please?, in realetion on how much worse than CO2?

@@DonoVideoProductions that could be reduced or even resolved by using higher grade SS such as 316 or 316L. He states in the video that the carbon oxidising was leading to the sludge you mentioned.

Yes, but it's still an alternative to fossil fuels, isn't that what matters the most?

Yeah! how can we get this list?

same here, i want the list of the items too... maybe i can find a way to make it more effective

Watch the video he puts the names of all the parts used and the tools used shouldn’t be very hard to identify. So far I’ve seen him use an angle grinder, a vise, and a drill press.

don't forget the batterie :)

Hey, hijacking this comment so more people are aware. This channel promotes scams so be careful clicking any links on this channel! Also many of these comments are from bots. Thanks!

Found it on Google. "Deosan HH+ is a brand new type of footbath product designed to prevent lameness in cattle." There we have it.

@@peterjackson2625 I thought that this is complete rubbish but I see that HH+ it is really useful - for cattle. 😊

Does anyone sells these kits ready to go

It works o know all u have to do is adjust your voltage to the water and keep the carburetor on so you can adjust the choke u need to be about half closed my a simple one and light the hydrogen side then u know it works

@@peterjackson2625 HH+ is a chemical mix that has many uses other than to assist in hydrolysis! smh

Lol 😆

Why would anyone need a video with a bunch of useless lies and misinformation in it? That's just not how our world works, nor from the physical perspective, neither from the common sense one. Perpetual motion engines are not only physically impossible, but also if there was any invention close to this, whole world would be already using them. Oil companies are not the ultimate power, like many conspirologists believe and car manufacturers would already be competing with each other for the most effective water engine.

Have it on my privat Cloud ;-)

Yes I noticed that, well commented. This needs done again in a much more scientifically monitored way. Even so, frankly I am sceptical nice try though. However, if genuine it would simply NOT be released by UKposts or any one else for that matter. Given past history would you??

Same what i thought and when there is put a load on it zero change in rpm"s ???? yeah no way

Another negative comment

@@AbuBakr1 well, what do you think?

Yes, i love the knowledge he is presenting. He is showing how to trick people in the "good old snake oil salesmen" style.

@@ogi22 And nobody in their right mind doesn't realize the mass and generational child abuses damaging the majority. Let's talk about what's really going wrong and why before another innocent and helpless child's life is ruined, eh?

@@01mustang05 Ah yes the old "Think of the children!!!" argument, works every time!

Yes it could be running off the batery

Where can i get HH+? 😅😅

@@nasriamzar3083 i wish i knew

thermodinamics

The HH+ was given to us by an anonymous subscriber. He claims to be patenting it after knowing about it. Don't know the backstory of it. We are just cautious to release too much information because so many people disappeared in the past.

where can a person get this HH+

@@HiddenTechnology_ "Many people disapeared..." just because of this we must give it to people. Secret is when "know it" less than two people. All other is "i just want money" or "i just make videos to earn money blah blah..." Big DISSLIKE for your video and channel. I go unsubscribe. Bye.

I guess for some generators there are LPG carburetors (not really carburetors anymore, more like there to regulate inflow) out there which should be possible to be used. What I am wondering about is more like: Under load the generator would take more Hydrogen than under little load: If always operated at high load, the engine would die eventually, not getting enough fuel (or getting lower Hz on the power output or "brown out" which could damage some electrical devices) or you would have too much fuel, pressure in the tank getting above safe levels and I do not want to be around when the brown gas accidentally ignites (I guess a safety valve which leads to a pipe immediate flaming off the excess fuel might actually work.But you really would need to make sure it is not back flaming)

Bruce HH O offers all that is needed for combustion, without aid of gasoline, engine vacuum is all that is needed along with spark to fire the HH O mixture, the throttle plate of the carburetor regulates the amount of mixture allowed in the generator, However the governor will not function; I have built HH O systems using solar panels and led acid batteries, modified DC current and electrolyte to aid voltage production at the plates of HH O generator, check valves to prevent backflow and explosion; Bottom line, The carburetor is basically bypassed and jets are no longer needed because HH O is already atomized and moved by engine vacuum.

;-) That's true.

Yup, that bubbler was producing about a bubble a second.

What are these bubbles?

@@delansick6865 not sure why he has the bubbler on there.... the electrolysis side would produce hydrogen and oxygen as the water is split. 2 hydrogen atoms and 1 oxygen atom for each water molecule split. The electrolysis process takes energy, and a lot of it, to do this. Pure water is an insulator, so you must add something to the solution to make it conductive, an acid works. His ‘magic HH+’ stuff is possibly an acid. Now..... no matter what you add to the water, the electrolysis of water is NEVER anywhere near 100% efficient, and the amount of hydrogen and oxygen produced running an engine is NEVER enough to produce enough power to split the water to produce the necessary hydrogen and oxygen. You can work it out as it takes 4 electrons to split one water molecule using moles of water, moles of Hydrogen and Oxygen produced, coulombs of electrons, and time. The process is mathematically and physically impossible. Why people spend so much time and effort putting on such hoaxes is beyond me.

Voce queria ver o atomo? Que visão heim

Well with a Octane rating of 140 or so. Those side tanks could be pressurized to the point of low bubblige. Also with the high octane rating, the genny wouldn't have to surge up much for the increased amperage's. Try running your car with 130-140+ octane fuel, I'll bet you get quite the HP boost. But the gen will not last long because of the higher engine temps....

Yeah, I suggest people compare the amount of gas produced at 18:10 and 25:40. That's a significant difference, yet the motor doesn't seem to notice. I'm pretty sure it should notice. I'd like to see a graph of the temp of the HHO generator over time. And the voltage of the battery over time. The skepticism I have is based on that dastardly Conservation of Energy Law. It takes a lot of energy to break the bonds of a water molecule. And there is an enormous amount of heat from the motor. That's all being converted from something, and I'm skeptical those tiny bubbles at 25:40 contain enough energy to satisfy the equation.

@@josephhoward2971 How would the HHO generator and bubbler pressurize? It isn't a closed system. There isn't a solenoid valve regulating fuel flow. There's only the carb's butterfly valve. Consider this, if what we just saw was possible, there would be HHO generators on every car. No, it's far more likely there's something we're not being shown going on here.

@@charlidog2 that is my question exactly. How much charge goes now to the battery. Wil it deplete or would the charge coil in the generator do a sufficient job keeping that battery up to charge. I wonder...

When you run an engine using water the engine runs smoothly and quieter

Same question, where can i get it? 😅😅

Working on cars isn't easy but do able. It'd definitely be a lengthy one. Considering your completely changing your combustion system from fossil to hydro wich both have different combustion systems internally in a vehicle. Idk enough to say what to change but you could keep your gas tank and just change the rest that lead up to the Injectors from what he's done. Complex but do-able

EXACTLY! He'll likely get "disappeared" soon.

That doesn't work he was still running the engine on gasoline in the bowl and not producing enough gases to make the engine even pop.

@@Ken-rk3by Yep, I saw all that fuel dripping out too when he dislocated the fuel line .. oh wait no I didn't. It's not that hard to produce enough HHO to run that engine, the problem is with the battery, it will only last so long before running out with the amount of draw required to perform the electrolysis. With such a small battery you probably wouldn't even get an hours running time.

@@klay5779 -- why is it that all you guys keep saying the battery is too small. IT'S not the battery, it's the 12-volt charging system in the generator that only puts out 6-amps, not enough. That engine wouldn't run on 10 times the bubbles that were produced at the start.

@Herbert Fuchs I would like to talk to you more about that your experiment

What happened to him?

@@iwannabeawitch LMAO he hasnt died it was a reference to stanley meyer

@@santiklingo oh fuck 💀💀💀💀 ig we just wait and see what happens to him

he should make the=at into a car engin

Your questions are not relevant since a combustion engine can't be run by water. This video is BS.

@@heinzpg It's not run by water. It's using electrolysis to seperate H2 and O. Then burning hydrogen. Rockets boosters are hydrogen. Have you tried reading? It's how you can get information.

@@Hunty49 I am quite aware that hydrogen obtained by electrolysis is seen here as possible fuel! But it is still outright impossible to run a car this way! Sorry, I feel it is you who needs additional informations and I can give them. Why can't you run a car this way? First of all, the production of hydrogen by electrolysis consumes more energy than the produced hydrogen can deliver. Second, the electrical energy for the electrolysis is supposed to be produced by a generator, driven by the hydrogen combustion motor. Both of them are not 100% efficient, this can't work out. In numbers: For one unit of electrical power you get perhaps 0.7 units of hydrogen power. The mechanical output of a hydrogen combustion engine with this hydrogen input power will be around 0.3 units. If you use this mechanical power to drive the generator you will get 0.25 units of electrical power, which can not substitute the 1.0 which are needed for the hydrogen production. And your car hasn't even moved, it only turned the generator ... They claim here they found "secret additives" to make electrolysis more efficient. I don't believe that crap, and efficiency can never be over 100% anyway. This video is a click bait, and it is not the first one of this sort.

Use the battery as is and convert your lack of insight into higher efficiency, ok?

Yep, spend all that time and money and in the end, after wracking your brain and wondering what you possibly could have done wrong, you will realise that this is all 100% bull puckey and that you have been had. It's called the LAW of thermodynamics for a reason. But keep on dude.

This is not working! I have tested it and not working.

@@adamg9958 It does work! However it takes more power to run it, then you can get out of it! In the long run you lose!

Sooooo many haters...must be the matrix

The genset's cylinder will need nanocoating to avoid cavitation. Use two pressure sensors in series to shut down electricity automatically, one on each container. To improve efficiency use pulse with modulation (PWM) You will have to test for best frequency x Voltage combo. The chemical in the water is just to improve conductivity, it would be an interesting study to find one that can protect against corrosion as well. On Mars, just loop the exhaust to the first cylinder and you can circumnavegate the planet on one liter of water.

Being that H is a gas, much like propane, it is probably injected from a plate just behind the carb much like a propane conversion kit. Not much science behind it, hydrogen like propane is highly flammable and auto ignites fast hence the quick starts.

the basics were used in a toy .. back in the 70s .. its just been suppressed to the utmost by the power hungry elite .. why are we letting kids make rocket fuel? cant have that .. they might get too smart ... definitely a SHTF tech.. at this point.. i am only wondering the degradation of hydrolysis without HH+ which could be difficult to acquire .. unless one stocked up then i would like to know utilization rates etc..

Anyone who's built an HHO maker/ HHO torch, like this. Knows it takes a lot of power to produce the HHO gas.....I built a small HHO torch a few years back that ran wired directly to a 100W solar panel. I used an air pump needle used to fill up basketballs for the torch tip & the 100W solar panel was enough to give me a little pen flame. An engine will run off HHO but it takes a lot of electricity to create the HHO. It's more efficient just to use an electric motor/electric vehicle. The little 12V generator starting battery might have enough power to run the generator for a few seconds before it goes dead. But he didn't just build a "free power" runs on water device. If someone can figure out how to produce HHO gas from water by using a lot less electricity/power. That's actually what the "big breakthrough" be. Using electricity to break water down into hydrogen & oxygen gas has been known since the late 1800's. To save gasoline/get better MPGs, you could however. #1 build a solar battery bank (or buy a solar generator) #2 Build an HHO generator & run the HHO generator off the battery pack, that's recharged by solar or wall plug-in. Then use a combination of gasoline & HHO to power a vehicle. Say 60% gasoline mixed with 40% HHO gas. In an older lower compression engine & you might have to retard the engine timing & bit.

Only a little doubtful ? I would have to see a full technical spec and calculations to believe it. This is yet another version of a perpetual motion machine. Impossible.

The gas level from the hydrogen tank did not decrease. Also, if oxygen is not separated, the resulting gas is dangerous in itself. And the whole system doesn't need a carburetor in this case.

@@janyjozsef I could see that the bubbles in the second water tank were often getting smaller and less frequent. That is proof of the reduction in gas production. The whole thing is pure hogwash!

Yeah I noticed the same thing Definitely look like there was not enough hydrogen produced to have that engine running But if it’s not smoke and mirrors well done

That's not a machine shop. He has hand tools and a simple $100 drill press.

Crazy how a commenter on UKposts can know who a person is despite not knowing jack about them! You must have a superpower!

you are rude and you should do some experiments with HHO yourself

J.C.B.BACKHOE.PROBABLY the best HYDROGEN digger in the world..

Below in the comment section there are many nay sayers who have been contracted by the lower levels of the U.S. govt that deal with assassinating inventors and discrediting inventors of Hydrogen sourced powered internal combustion engines therefore the below commentors that attempt to tell you that these systems don't work even though you just saw it working are lying to you. The proper way to deal with assassins is to kill them in self defense of course but first find out who sent them and then deal with them and then deal with the assassin. Self defense using lethal methods is legal so that's not even a thought. However all these facts having been brought forward it should be said that the Hydrogen systems in the above video do work but there's more efficient methods: For example, to run your gasoline engine on Hydrogen all you have to do is remove your gasoline spark plugs and replace them with Hydrogen spark plugs specifically designed to run your engine on Hydrogen from water. These spark plugs are classified but our organization has made them available to the general public just because we can and felt like doing it. Anyone who doesn't like that come tell us to our faces and we'll help you out more than you were expecting to be helped ..... These spark plugs are made to project high voltage plasma across two McDonald's style arches at the end of the spark plug from the existing voltage coming from the existing coils already on your engine which makes contact with water vapor instead of gasoline vapor and while doing so separates the Hydrogen from the water AND detonates it all in the same 1/70th of a second without any need for an electrolyte. This is how all classified military Hydrogen engines are operated. A similar spark plug was sold in autoparts stores called the FIRESTORM SPARK PLUG before the panicking U.S. Govt stopped the sales of said plug and "confiscated" all those that were sold. These systems do work but only people like us who shoot back in very large numbers have the ability to swarm this planet's population with this knowledge can do it because lets face it, one must have the ability to face off with Govt bad guys and walk away for a steak dinner. But for the rest of you, just make these simple spark plugs in your garage and use them in your car and keep it to yourself and you will have beaten the entire flakey Govt at the same time in your own way. YOU are your own authority always remember that. Anyone else who claims to be YOUR authority is a lying sack of bits ... .. .. 🤺 🦂 🌶 🥩 🍸

They run better with a pcm pulse circuit at double the current. I would guess they would run even better at high voltage pulses around 50 volts DC and using the rpm to regulate the pulses and the output adjusted to the engine needs.

Don't take this video seriously. I can go into detail if you want, but this is perpetual motion type nonsense. His hydrolysis would have to be more than 100% efficient for this to work, and that's just not how reality works.

con artist prize for him.

Oh yes i was looking for such comments only cause i was wondering the same, and how does a gasoline engine run on HHO even

@@aryan1211_ yes, and how does a gasoline engine work with using only one small HHO bubble per second...... But I have to say that it was a nice mechanic job though

Yeah then it's night time.

Adam, what you said about the efficiency of the process is absolutely true! That is why this is NOT a Perpetual Motion Machine. Energy from OUTSIDE the generating system is constantly needed.....The Battery. Disconnect it and the system stops. Now if he charged the Battery from the generator........🤣😱🤣

@@winbobmarks8236 On point explanation. Of course solar energy can be used, but then the problem of solar dependency also comes to play, as well as low effieciency. Another thing that almost no one mentions, tho, is the fact that storing hydrogen is a problem in itself. High flamable/explosive, can escape cointainer due to metal absorbing/bubble forming, needs to be stored in high pressure due to it's low density. The risk are too high, and the fact that there are better options, like natural gas that can be made from organic matter. Of course, gas fuel in itself is more complicated than dealing with liquids.

@@captainpjarker what are you talking about? No reaction know or observed thus far in human history produces more energy than the initial input. That is how entropy and the flow of time works. We don't use wind turbines or coal energy because they reaction is efficient or geneates energy from nowhere, but because they are widely available and the extraction of said energy is simple. Which is not true to hydrogen: it don't exist in high quantities and at an affordable price, the storage process is difficult and it is highly flammable/explosive. Not to mention there are better gas options than hydrogen, like i said earlier, natural gas from organic matter or biodiesel, although they can't compete with petroleum due to cost and inefficiency.

@@TheCuteZombie Hydrogen is actually a lot cheaper, only problem is greed. No one has put money into a hydrogen system. hydrogen could be much more efficient and safer then any other fuel type. The only problem is that they would lose control over their money source. Once something big to refine hydrogen is made, it will try to be turned smaller due to hydrogen being one of the most abundant gases. Theres articles and studies done that proves hydrogen could be the future if we actually tried.

@@TheCuteZombie exactly. So why are you saying this is useless? Of COURSE there’s going to be energy loss. That’s not the point. You’re focusing on the negatives instead of the actual theory. Half the people in these comments don’t know what they’re talking about and the half that do want to act like a new fuel system is a negative? How? Also, did you really just say hydrogen isn’t readily abundant? You’re joking, right? It’s LITERALLY the most abundant element in the universe, so if THATS not abundant enough, neither is coal or oil or gas. It can’t compete with petroleum?? Bro please for both our sakes stop talking out of your ass 😂 have you seen gas prices lately? 7$ for a gallon of the stuff. 5$ for a pack of 24 water bottles is a pretty high estimate. Not to mention hydrogen burns more than 50% slower than gasoline (that means it’s more than double as efficient) so don’t tell me it “can’t compete”. You have no idea what you’re talking about lmfao. Probably the only reaosn hydrogen cars aren’t more popular is because base hydrogen gas is 4x as expensive as gasoline, but that’s buying the gas straight. If you buy purified water? Not even close to the same cost for 2x as much efficiency

The genset's cylinder will need nanocoating to avoid cavitation. Use two pressure sensors in series to shut down electricity automatically, one on each container. To improve efficiency use pulse with modulation (PWM) You will have to test for best frequency x Voltage combo. The chemical in the water is just to improve conductivity, it would be an interesting study to find one that can protect against corrosion as well. On Mars, just loop the exhaust to the first cylinder and you can circumnavegate the planet on one liter of water.

@@josidasilva5515 cavitation is used in another industrial secret to heat water at very low cost a device the size of a thermos flask could provide all the hot water you need for pennies a day

It takes 20 amps to make 1.5 lpm in my experience.

@@fjrmark4244 Thank you alot for responding, i was looking for a video like that and youve came with this nice one!