Perfectly stated!

this test is somewhat non-effective, as he changed the fuel type. but did not retune the engine/carburetor to accomodate this new fuel type. all this proved is that when an engine left as is, it will not gain a benefit from hho.

@@jimmyhackers8980 the difference would be negligible when you consider just how much of the engine output power goes into generating the hydrogen gas. it's a failed free energy machine.

@jimmy said the same thing in my comment. This test wasn't performed in the right way

@@jimmyhackers8980 how are you re-tuning the carbs as you are driving down the road? It's effective enough for practical purposes.

That's a proper BigClive post!! I can hear you saying it in your distinct voice!

One moment please! Used that today before making a sjematic for an electronic repair I had to do to an unknown smoll measuring device, kinda homemade. Very simple schematic, took pictures as well to know where all the red and black wires went, in case one would break off... Thanks for your very informative and humorous videos!

"one moment please" - Breaks the unit down instead...

Hello Clive, good to see you kicking about.

Introducing the EXPLOSIVE Japanese Fanny Bubbles doll

Great at teaching you how not to do the assignment 😂 Bro is on the same level as click bait UKposts creators with this video

wow , hey may i ask how old you are? im 56

Hydrogen Powered Muscle Truck: The Future is HERE! Supercharged LS Classic With Zero Emissions ukposts.info/have/v-deo/inF2nJ6QqIN2o3k.html

in theory, insects cant fly, please elaborate on that

@@rcajavus8141 What does that have to do with the previous post? Also... of course insects can fly.

Sounds like attitude of a brilliant pessimist who lacks the creativity to invent or improve upon technology. The other side of that coin, while mostly true, is that there are staggering amounts of efficiency losses that can be reduced or eliminated. It’s not a question of defying thermodynamics, but creatively thinking about ways to recover energy that may be left on the table somewhere. Just my initial take . I’d be interested to see some more detailed and accurate testing on this.

@@AB-dm8nt You can invent and create all you want, the USPTO database is full of such inventions, but if they are going to work, they are bound by physics.

I don't understand the reference to perpetual motion machines here. If you put this on a car or even this video... You still have to replenish the salinated water. Given it was put on a vehicle why could it not simply reduce gas consumption?

China and Russia is spamming the algorithm to ensure you remain segregated and ignorant.

Practical engineering. :) watch first, thank me later!

One my friend was working on engines' test benches, they mostly worked on a variable compression ratio engine prototype but they also accepted side projects. One of these clients was the "inventor" of one of those generator, looking for a demonstration that his system worked (props to him for trying, most of those don't want to involve real science). They tried, with unbelievably favorable conditions, they never could detect the slightest efficiency increase, even trying on a very small monocylinder engine the system couldn't deliver enough hydrogen so it would have never worked on the bigger engines we have in our cars, and it might even have been with an external power supply instead of taking power from the crankshaft. I think it was more than 10 years now. The inventor left really disappointed, I don't know if he kept selling these generators though.

what about if it was in a diesel van, where you have solar cells on the roof and extra battery capacity for storing all that... wouldn't that work for improving mpg?

@@aninfid the extra drag from the solar panels and wieght from the batteries etc would loose you mpg!

Would feeding hydrogen to an engine possibly damage the metal components?

@@aninfid at best, with 45% efficiency of electricity to HHO conversion, you'd get maybe 1/2 HP of "free" power, assuming you could fit four 250W solar panels on the roof of the van. I think it would be smarter to just feed to the electricity directly into the car's electrical system (somehow) to ease the burden on the alternator to produce electricity for the headlamps, ventilation, etc.

There is one advantage to the HHO scam It makes it easy as pie to spot a dumb kid with a wrench claiming to be a mechanic. Just ask if HHO generators really work!

@@humanistwriting5477 the only time I saw a car on UKposts run on hydrogen was when a dude plumbed his car to a fishtank filled with muriatic acid and he dumped in a load of beer cans. It does work assuming you have an endless supply of beer cans and don't mind driving around with a tank of acid sloshing around and you have a carful of buddies shotgunning Busch Light as fast as possible...

All I know is that a very small leak in the connection between the HHO cell and the engine can be really bad if the gas find a place to collect. The detonation of just a few liters HHO gas can make a big bang.

@@bknesheim Yeah and it'll make your driver's seat smell restroom fresh too!

Did anyone think to advance the timing closer to tdc?

Too bad high school science teachers are often forced to A) teach for a stupid test, and B) have a class full of students at widely different skill levels. Not usually their fault

I had a high-school physics teacher who went the extra mile, just like this guy did. But if your point is that there's not enough of that ... then I agree.

My high school science classes in New York were fantastic... I feel bad for others who didn't have the same opportunity.

Government subsidized schools are too busy teaching Ideologies to make time to teach science. Currently, a College History textbook has only 200 pages and it is all racism.

NO, you have not just debunked this generator! I am a big follower of your work and really appreciate your efforts! You quote efficiencies but have NOT incorporated any into your Generator System. There has been many, many engineering minds that have that have looked at this problem. One of which was your own American Stanley Meyer who discovered the high mean resonant frequency for electrolysis and also a supper efficient injector system. You also must remember to set the timing correctly (TDC) as the HHO mixture implodes at ignition! With these improvements and say a second battery & larger alternator would totally transform your findings! The idea of using water as a fuel is so enticing I am surprised that you rebuke it so easily! Clean Energy, Low Cost, Readily Available should have driven you further in your research; as it is a very important subject to all of mankind! No wonder the oil giants are frightened! So please give this important subject more of your precious time and look at it with your wonderful analytic mind which you have shown in the past!

It's like Mr. Wizard's World grew up with me.

If you really are interested in science, then it's not too late. That interest rarely begins because of school or a teacher. It's a mindset that starts with "why"? The scientific method is: Observation Patern recognition Theory Test Conclusions Repeat without end...

Really brother why a nuke ,way to dangerous I've worked at a plant an the cancer an things it does to ur health Really not worth ur life facts ,but not too bad of a place to work I guess, it's alot safer now then back in the day ,I personally wouldn't want to stay out there forever, an id never work where they put the waste at ,I've heard horror stories cancer an I've seen it ,an I've seen where people have worked there an it not bother them so??? Me personally not worth my health at all no amount of money is worth it to me at all facts

Surprisingly it’s only the second best oxidizer on the periodic tables

I had the same reaction.

@@samblackstone3400 The best one is Fluorine but it's really hard to work with!

@@ex1tium yeah that stuff eats through almost anything

@@samblackstone3400 isnt it? far behind the best? arent the halogens way better at it? (lets not get into ozone please lol)

That is what I was saying to my self the whole time. I mean I know any real gain is so little that it wouldn't matter but it should require less fuel to maintain the same RPM when the HHO is being added. If this had been a fuel injected engine it would have automatically adjusted the fuel.

Especially since it takes about 2/3 less hydrogen to get the same effect as gas

Thanks!

Because a lot of people today would rather watch mindless drivel than actually learn something. I'm glad I'm one of those people that enjoys learning.

@@MrEazyE357 People in general would rather watch mindless drivel* It's always been this way.

He s not sexy and he doesn't have any " Heisenberg" vibes. These are serious vidéos for serious people. That's why he doesn't have 5millions subs.

Maybe he should wear a tight skirt and inappropriate amounts of lipgloss🤣 Just boobs won't help. Look at Fran🤗

You're welcome!

I wish the creator would answer you!

Except that if you generate the HHO with power from the engine, you lose. Also, tiny amounts of hydrogen my burn quicker, but the vast majority of the fuel remains the hydrocarbons.

Yes. And it still doesn't work. The problem is that this gesture (let's try to think how it could work in theory and try it out in practice) is like asking doubtful Thomas to stick his finger in the wound. And even after people will see this, many will still say "IT WORKS, I KNOW IT DOES". I had many discussions about this topic and fuel from waste creation. It is the same principle. Thermodynamics. You can sometimes bend a little bit laws of physics, but you cannot break them.

@@ogi22 Thermodynamics is Physics, which for more than 90% of people simply do not understand; those that do often still get it wrong.

@@sonpopco-op9682 Oh beleve me i know. That's why i love watching this stuff, because very often i pick up on something i ommited previously. My latest "epiphany" was a couple years ago, when i finally understood why energy density (ie frim the sun or magnetic field) drops with a square of of distance. I couldn't somehow connect it to the same principle as why volume increases with 3rd power, area with a square and distance with 1st power. That's what you get if you are given an equation at school and take it for granted. Not even thinking what it represents :)

@@ogi22 Thats fantastic. I had my latest epiphany only a few months ago, when I finally understood how electricity in its different facets ( long range, short range, bulk) explains all of the forces present in nature.

HHO reaction Burns so much hotter than gasoline. Of course the réaction will be slightly improved.

There's an equally important warning for graduated students.

Yeah but is it because of parallax error?

@@erikkovacs3097 Skewed views = errors. So, yeah.

@@amarissimus29 There's an equally important warning for the graduated. Period.😀

And I am no longer a fan of your channel due to suspecting that you are sponsored by oil industry.

Glad it helped!

Main presenter OP

Science daddy

Professor Dad.

Remember when he was going to make a 5hp hydroplane? It's like he's yet to figure out the 1st Law of thermodynamic.

@@cheerdiver don’t be a smartass.

NO, you have not just debunked this generator! I am a big follower of your work and really appreciate your efforts! You quote efficiencies but have NOT incorporated any into your Generator System. There has been many, many engineering minds that have that have looked at this problem. One of which was your own American Stanley Meyer who discovered the high mean resonant frequency for electrolysis and also a supper efficient injector system. You also must remember to set the timing correctly (TDC) as the HHO mixture implodes at ignition! With these improvements and say a second battery & larger alternator would totally transform your findings! The idea of using water as a fuel is so enticing I am surprised that you rebuke it so easily! Clean Energy, Low Cost, Readily Available should have driven you further in your research; as it is a very important subject to all of mankind! No wonder the oil giants are frightened! So please give this important subject more of your precious time and look at it with your wonderful analytic mind which you have shown in the past!

Thank you!

​@@TechIngredients My English is too bad to understand everything properly. But if I understand it correctly, the electricity consumption corresponds to the petrol saved. Could you then also say that with a heater, I could achieve the same heating output with electricity and the hydrogen generator instead of heating oil or natural gas?

It was a one dimensional explanation of HHO, at best.

See"the water engine works"

Thank you!

The content is great. The editing could use a little work. Whoever edits them has a bright future in straight to VHS 1990s Christian movies.

@@miketaylor00 I see nothing wrong with the editing.

@@miketaylor00 His son does the editing. But I think like any video if the content is good, the production doesn't matter.

@@timsmith2725 you probably enjoy 90s straight to VHS Christian movies

Thanks!

@@TechIngredients Doesn't that whole sceme violate one or more of Newton's Principles ?🤔

Sure!

They are back, people are gullible and want to believe something

@@Steevo69 Just wait until fuel cell EVs become mainstream...those same people will think it is proof that this 'technology' really works

You cant be serious.🤦‍♂️ Its so easy to lie your self.😁 If you watch this video, you Will understand, it wont work.

@@uittoan Frankly I don't give a damn about what you have to say. All I know is that it works. The problem is there are too many critics like yourself that put it on paper and the equations say it won't work. But they are too cheap or lazy to build it and try it themselves. Thermodynamics has been wrong time and time again because our math system has too many screw-ups in it. The only way to advance knowledge is to go beyond the blackboard and just try it.

You are good to go as you are running in several hours of travelling time. He is merely testing out in a few minutes with very little affect of surroundings condition and temperature.

@@Ken-rk3by Hi Ken, am Bonnie. I admire your curiosity. I'm an engineer and had a lot of technical experiments too and i want to follow post. I'm making a study on HHO projects used on cars. I am building a wet type HHO generator using 12 volts. I plan to install a separate alternator and battery system exclusively intended for the HHO generator only. I am buying a carburetor to supply the brown gas to be connected to the intake manifold independent of the existing carburetor. The original carburetor will just supply gasoline to the engine for idling condition. The additional carburetor to supply brown gas to power the engine will be operated separately. Since the brown gas ignites and explodes instantly compared to gasoline, I will revise the spark timing to occur few degrees after top dead center. The present spark timing is about 8 - 12 degrees before top dead center. May I know your comment on this... Thanks in advance...

@@bonnieantenor6548 - What I did was just install the HHO supply before the oxygen sensor. I didn't do anything about the timing, as I don't know enough about electronic ignition systems as I am old school. I did find that the small amount of HHO worked best at low RPM. I wouldn't change the timing as there is a very small amount of HHO being mixed with the gasoline. All it seems to do is make a more complete combustion of the gasoline. Whatever you do, don't run the HHO before you start the car, because it could blow the engine. I didn't get any knock or pre-detonation in my engine. I hope that helps you out.

Magnetic fields in permanent magnets fall when acted on by oppositional magnets fields. If you hold a permanent magnet the wrong way in an extremely strong magnetic field, its magnetization will be permanently reversed.

All of those devices have at least one problem that means they don't work, and a lot of them have several issues. There's good reasons why they aren't making someone billions.

Sometimes you just have to do the thing to prove the work and that it doesnt work, because sometimes it ends up working (even just like by a tiny fraction) and you have to figure out why. and end up discovering something new to explain why something isnt how we thought on paper. Even though something like this example is pretty clear cut its still worth doing a practical experiment to be completely certain :) and thats why I love this channel, they are willing to put in the work and see the outcome even when it seems silly. Plus I feel like we got some great data that can be used elsewhere! Hope we see more of the HHO generator in future experiments and projects.

Wow! You guys kill me, hopefully not literally! 😂

Yes. Start with the true costs of current model, which is not captured in this demonstration. If you have never refined crude, looked into refining crude, and just assume gasoline is cheaper than HHO production, you are trapped in someone else's dream for their life. And then we use a demonstration with an engine designed with compressive explosions and at best 28% efficiency. 35% maximum in a controlled laboratory....and we still make them, and buy them. MIT proved 30 years ago a engine coupled with a Stirling cycle yields upwards of 60% efficiency with that precious "cheap" petrol product endorsed here. The problem? Engine manufacturers found it easier and thus more profitable to keep business as usual, big government agreed.

@@the_natrix9959 I don't think anyone thinks gas is the best XD but in this setup which is a good example of what people are being sold its at best the same or worse than just gas. I believe in the immediate future the best use of hydrogen is to generate it off excess wind and solar power as storage then to use it as a fuel source to be converted back into electricity in an electric vehicle on demand. But even then only time will tell how viable that is. Actually I would like to see a video on that!

@@the_natrix9959 you have lots of words in your comment but very few of them make sense or are backed up by evidence. Unlike this video.

@The Vogon Poet that's right, but in this case the carburetor has a float valve. so it makes no difference

​@@Rothammel1 was here to type that😆

A

@@Rothammel1 It makes a difference in the float level, but not enough to matter.

@@Bob5mith true

yeah it will just technically be running richer.

​@ejrupp9555 leaner. The 02 sensor picks up the extra oxygen from the hho. That's my guess anyway because any vehicle I've done this on with 02 sensors always throws a lean code. I tap into the vacuum ports so idk if that makes a difference or not

@@johnmyers6827 A lawn mower engine would run rich as it doesnt have a computer.

@@johnmyers6827 O2 packs tighter than N2. O2 has a smaller cylindrical diameter. O2 is about 6.25% smaller. It may seem odd that the heavier molecule is smaller, but look it up. For every bit of N2 that is displaced by 2H2 & O2 is a proportional increase in volumetric density at the same pressure. O2 sensors are calibrated to compare outside 21% O2 with exhaust O2. The ecu needs to be reprogrammed or it will run richer than it needs to. There were two different studies in Arizona and Florida with spark induced combustion (gas) and compression induced combustion (diesel). HHO worked better on sparked ICEs than on compression ignition due to increased thermal efficiencies and the increase in the amount of stroke length that was pressurized. Effectively, pressure rise was faster, so more of the stroke length was being used. HHO will make your engine run worse if you do not change the ignition timing and fuel delivery. You may find this interesting. hydrogen-first-aid.com/hho_efie.html

@ejrupp9555 very well stated. To back that up on my carbureated vehicles the hho systems have shown improvement ableit 2-5 mpg average gain. If I was able to tune the computer on non carb engines I'm sure the gain would show and perhaps even double the results.

Our pleasure!

Stan Meyer's spoke in woo. He told you one thing but did another. There used to be a Ford Taurus wagon that ran on 100% water here on the Texas coast. Guy died. I think it was Exxon that bought the car from his widow for $2k. Last I was told, if you can demonstrate it works, big oil will cut you a check for $5B to go away.

This video, done excellently, has verified that electrolysis is inefficient and thus consumes more energy than supplied. Stanley, previously to the car you describe, also had a patent not related to a car years previously. My guess, when you talked to the man, he would have stated that it does not work on ‘electrolysis’ which any high school student would tell you is an inefficient process.

​@@magncity1817when his car was a thing he talked about frequency to pull apart the hydrogen and oxygen to rum the car as it went into the combustion chamber. Much like how you cam break a glass with sound. Or you can break anything else with sound

Yes Stanley was using water fracture and not electrolysis, which uses a method of flyback charging to liberate the hydrogen and oxygen and was higher voltage as well... this method was much more effective at getting the water to change into a gas and so used much less real power. In addition HHO uses chemicals to make the water conduct better and that generates heat whereas Stanley Meyer's method could work with distilled water alone and did not generate heat. This continues to enthrall my imagination as if it did not work...why did the establishment try to buy him off? Those people have the intelligence to know a good deal when they see one!

Thanks for honest reply. I live very close to Mt Sterling and am interested in knowing more.

carnot efficiency limit for all thermal engines eff.c = ( Tmax - Tmin) / Tmax. °K

@@arturoeugster7228 Issue with increasing Tmax is that pesky engines tend to melt... that is why we have intercoolers :D

@James Good old entropy never lies :D

@@yoshyoka No, this is the idealized cycle , and the maximum temperature would be the combustion temperature ,by far not the piston, or cylinder wall temperature. Intercooling is an entirely different concept, reducing the work needed to compress the working gas.

@@arturoeugster7228 That is correct, yet the combustion temperature can be only so hot before pistons start to melt and temperature management too complex. By intercooling you are off course correct.

The problem with hho is that it doesn't lubricate your engine the way gasoline does and sometimes condenses and leaves water vapor in the engine your supposed to use an air dryer but that doesn't always work

It's been known for years to use ceramic piston rings and the O2 sensor issue is why people use older vehicles without a computer. Also you should only be using a vehicle you're prepared to lose, people typically do this with cheap cars as a side project and there have been a number of deaths due to detonation, the timing has to be adjusted to suit implosion when the engine is running hydrogen (your ears will pop on the flame test if you have implosion afaik) The spark plugs should also be upgraded and coupled with purpose built circuitry, look up "water spark plug" if you want to find out more

computerized cars need re programed for it to work

@@brixzereg The hydrogen does *not* replace the fuel at all. It is just added to the air intake and comprises less than 1 percent of it. In this example, 1 liter out of 150 litres per minute is 0.66%. Times 2/3 for the H content = 0.44% That is almost indistinguishable from zero, and you will certainly not notice any difference in performance.

@@ahaveland in this example the hydrogen oxygen mixture is added to air- fuel mix of the carburetor or injectors without it being leaned out to compensate. The thing is however that hho doesn't increase performance or efficiency it just replaces some of the fuel. Because it burns so quickly It takes much more hydrogen-air by volume than the gas-air mix to run the same motor

Thanks!

"N" Worked. It was The Gas Companies and the Government that shut it down

Driving with the regulator works very well for economy. I've noticed between full acceleration and gradual acceleration there isn't much difference in overall consumption on highway (because you're accelerading for like 1-5% of the travel, so 10 or 20l/100 over like 2km doesn't change much, you'd rather find cheaper fuel, and also it's a bit misleading since you have increased consumption over a shorter time), but for town it probably would make a bit more of an impact. For maximum efficiency you want to run around 1600-1800rpm on a 2l diesel, though specifics depend on the engine. So if you want to accelerate try to shift up at 2k rpm.

I always drive a stick and keep the revs and gears optimized for fuel economy . Planning ahead and using the engine to decrease speed ... I only usually use the brakes to come to a complete stop when necessary and will even coast in neutral when approaching an intersection if possible . Easily saves me 35% less fuel than when driving in a 'mood' .

When I drive home late at night, I play a game of no brakes. The entire ride I'm not allowed to touch my brake (unless mandated by situations like lights or cars braking in front of me). Late at night the amount of traffic is sufficiently light to allow me to do that and I only have a couple of traffic lights to navigate. But the traffic lights are predictable too, so I can see (and fairly accurately guess) from a great distance if I need to keep the gas on or slow the car down. It's surprisingly hard to do, but it allows you to get to know your car better and it introduces a fun pass time for what is otherwise a boring thing to do.

@@glitter_fart opening the windows is worse at higher speeds, so the ac can be the right choice still, also in actual use unless it's extremely hot and you need the ac on full blast all the time, it's more like 3-5%.

"Drive with your head a little further in the future" is something most drivers today definitely don't practice.

Honestly, high school is the best possible time to have that learning experience. You know - if the company you're working for is bull, you need to jump ship asap. Imagine that you had a wife and 3 kids when that happened.

It would actually make the truck far less environmentally friendly, by messing with the burn in the combustion chamber, causing far more unpleasant gases to be produced. Your Dads friend was/is a fraudster/scammer :(

@@kevinshort3943 you accuse people but what have you done in your life? he tried and failed he probably wasn't a physicist he started a business ran into problems and moved on. talk less because no one cares about your non evidence based claim or your accusations to make yourself feel better about being a no life

@@ColonelSandersLite Thus the reason the company kept selling them even after they knew it was a piece of trash idea. It's hard to get a man to understand something when his livelihood depends on not understanding it.

They should have advertised that lighter fuel mixtures could cause less wear on the engine by burning cleaner. Doesn't fix the tempature problem but at least it would be true. I might be a bit biased though as I have always liked the idea of hydrogen as a fuel source. Not sure how much time or heartache it will take but I am convinced ICE hydrogen engines are going to happen, not the next 50 years maybe but it's going to happen eventually.

He’s correct, with the inefficiency caused by the time for fuel generation from water it’s not feasible. But all the guys who produced on demand at the fuel rail, have all been suicided, like that guy who toured the US in that horrible little green car.

he is not testing the exhaust fuel-oxy ratio it can run on higher fuel ratio and can really could not tell the difference of the engine performance.

I found the only real practical free fuel to be used veggy oil. Worked in my '98 VW TDI and '92 F-250 diesel. But EPA emissions now prevent it from being used in any vehicle post 2006.

i did not understand what he was doing till he was finished.

@@David-ik8wj Yessir! I call that a good mystery-suspense story...

NO, you have not just debunked this generator! I am a big follower of your work and really appreciate your efforts! You quote efficiencies but have NOT incorporated any into your Generator System. There has been many, many engineering minds that have that have looked at this problem. One of which was your own American Stanley Meyer who discovered the high mean resonant frequency for electrolysis and also a supper efficient injector system. You also must remember to set the timing correctly (TDC) as the HHO mixture implodes at ignition! With these improvements and say a second battery & larger alternator would totally transform your findings! The idea of using water as a fuel is so enticing I am surprised that you rebuke it so easily! Clean Energy, Low Cost, Readily Available should have driven you further in your research; as it is a very important subject to all of mankind! No wonder the oil giants are frightened! So please give this important subject more of your precious time and look at it with your wonderful analytic mind which you have shown in the past!

@@patmcintyre8421 If it eats the same amount of fuel for the same work, how can it be more efficient? Ultimately the chemical energy in (fuel) to electrical energy out is the efficiency measurement in this electrical generator system. Just to be extra sure the mechanical part does not cause problems, there was even an RPM sensor. You do not even need to know the Joules of fuel used since it was the same. Same fuel, same seconds. Joules is wattseconds. And it actually has *extra* fuel in terms of water when HHO electrolyzer is installed which means it is *less* efficient - you have to lug that water around in a real car. (and the electrolyzer itself too) If running rich was an issue you would hear knocking and/or the motor would turn at different RPM. This little change of fuel mix does *literally nothing* . By the way, adjust your engine *before* and also *after* to actually see that literally nothing has changed. It's easy to compare unadjusted to adjusted engine and get fooled.

@@patmcintyre8421 I agree, I think the issue has been that people only think of this singular method of separating the molecules. Electrolysis as a method is just not efficient if you're using manufactured electrical power, and that's how every single skeptic proves it, by doing it the worst way possible.

Thanks and welcome!

It wouldn't be worth the time to disprove it. It's impossible. It might be interesting to replicate the fraud like exposing a magic trick.

I understand. However, the water isn't really a problem in this situation, but a chamber filled with sulphuric acid that has a non-zero risk of an explosion is a serious risk.

I'd watch them because it's entertaining and very informative.

Scam?? .. my uncle knows a guy with a friend in Africa, who powers his car and house with Water, this guy here is just using the wrong water and forgot the magic magnets!!! /s

@@KrustyKlown Jet fuel is a hoax!

Yeahhh !! If you go ballons go small ok. H2 is a bomb ! And You can use a high power flame Torch, no gas bottles, just water !

@@EnricoMarangonJunior That's not the H2. That's the O2. You can make same thing happen with an Oxy-Acetylene torch just by turning off the acetylene first. H2 just makes a large flame when ignited in air.

@@WilReid Oh! the O2 "bombs" and the H2 just "flame out" ? that's new ! And "use as a high..." the "as" was missing in my sentence. And Yeah I saw the acetylene torches go bang and never tough it was the O2, I always associated that to "wrong ratio" and now makes total sense, it IS the wrong ratio but in the O2 valve. Thanks Mr Will Reid.

They don't last very long. If you put one in your car (some people have), you have to replace it very often, but parts are cheap

Interesting

yeah in attempt to "pre-cool" the air which kinda helps increasing massflow to the engine.

That's water injection, I believe the B-52 bomber also does that trick for take-offs and for cars Hydrodiesel aims to get the same effect

It's still used today in race cars. It's a 50/50 of methanol and water, you spray it in blown (supercharged) applications at the drag strip. You inject this myst before the blower, and it's basically 118-120 octane mixed into your system.

it cooles the intake air und raises the thermal efficiency according Carnot Cycle.

Have you seen his jet engine tests? It probaly is his fan and his crap ;-D

I'd love him as a neighbor today! Even though the fan blades are already a little shitty now lol.

@@greg20152015 lol. That is so true. Greg from South Bend Indiana

He will have lots of bulk flour, sugar, oil and raw cacao to share with you

Imagine how life might have changed, might have done something else in school.

If you are here watching this, doesnt that make him your current teacher?

That's great! When what we struggle to design, construct, and demonstrate helps other people with their projects...thats what it's all about.

You can also use the hydrogen with an arc, for atomic hydrogen welding. Very hot and clean (and essentially obsolete, I'm told.)

@@UncleKennysPlace Yes, but that would require large quantities of hydrogen, and I separate it from the oxygen produced. I just made a little homemade apparatus with some stainless steel plates (AISI 316), a bubbler, and a flashback arrestor. :) For real welding, I use my TIG welder or in thick material my stick welder (MMA).

And you can weld underwater. But the real issue with HHO generators, is not to add to fossil fuel but to replace it and not for efficiency, but for zero carbon output because clearly water is cheaper and cleaner than Gasoline. It is about saving the planet not your pocket book.

NO, you have not just debunked this generator! I am a big follower of your work and really appreciate your efforts! You quote efficiencies but have NOT incorporated any into your Generator System. There has been many, many engineering minds that have that have looked at this problem. One of which was your own American Stanley Meyer who discovered the high mean resonant frequency for electrolysis and also a supper efficient injector system. You also must remember to set the timing correctly (TDC) as the HHO mixture implodes at ignition! With these improvements and say a second battery & larger alternator would totally transform your findings! The idea of using water as a fuel is so enticing I am surprised that you rebuke it so easily! Clean Energy, Low Cost, Readily Available should have driven you further in your research; as it is a very important subject to all of mankind! No wonder the oil giants are frightened! So please give this important subject more of your precious time and look at it with your wonderful analytic mind which you have shown in the past!

NO, you have not just debunked this generator! I am a big follower of your work and really appreciate your efforts! You quote efficiencies but have NOT incorporated any into your Generator System. There has been many, many engineering minds that have that have looked at this problem. One of which was your own American Stanley Meyer who discovered the high mean resonant frequency for electrolysis and also a supper efficient injector system. You also must remember to set the timing correctly (TDC) as the HHO mixture implodes at ignition! With these improvements and say a second battery & larger alternator would totally transform your findings! The idea of using water as a fuel is so enticing I am surprised that you rebuke it so easily! Clean Energy, Low Cost, Readily Available should have driven you further in your research; as it is a very important subject to all of mankind! No wonder the oil giants are frightened! So please give this important subject more of your precious time and look at it with your wonderful analytic mind which you have shown in the past!