Ahh.. thats why he was such a bad actor. I see....

Not really Bear Naff. Waterworld is a vision of the earth after the collapsing , when the surface of the earth will so decrease that water will cover most of it. You can't fight the physical natural laws . . . The sun is burning all in our solar system, and this thermal energy is release in explosions by the planets. This is the cause of the birth of the moons. The earth will explode one day. Dinosaurs are dead because of this periodical / cyclic event . And after, we will be in a kind of water world. This is why they build Machu Picchu ... and this is why one ancient civilization is in Tibet. The High altitude will be the safe place to be when this event will come. lol

Waterworld did alright though. Its a myth that it failed financially. Overall it even made a bit plus.

@@aurigo_tech - It's not a myth, it's a cyclic reality.

Bear Naff The movie didn’t bomb it was one of the most popular movies in the world if not the For its time

Hellgie1 wow.

But don't you need batteries because of the transfer shitch delay? For such a big system it's mandatory.

@@gustavobrtt They are the batteries. Transfer switch delay would be the same for a battery system. I believe you are thinking of an "online UPS" which is constantly supplying power through an inverter via the batteries, which are constantly being charged by the grid. No delay with those. Probably used in conjunction with the main Diesel / flywheel UPS in server rooms etc.

Take this video down now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Accelerating faster than Earth's spin in centrifugal forces does what; faster than the solar system...? Exactly We know the benefits of being able to have centrifugal force; it can become a gyroscope, that provides stability In multiple axis, with multiple gyroscopes at different dimensions....well then all you need it to provide resistance in any variable to make force in that direction; i.e. everything we see is a loss of the universe; heat, electricity, ect. If you can spin hundreds of thousands of rotations per, whatever, then you could do millions with a short leap in advancement. So a super electrostatic motor, that is also gyroscopic...a battery, your propulsion, stability control, all in one. Thrown into your flying saucer; you'd fly into a thunderstorm and charge your saucer; spinning your gyroscopic mechanisms up to millions of rpms, all stabilizing each other; and enough power to fly around the Galaxy. Make sure hang solo has done the proper calculation in the computer; zip off into space. Avoid the emp's of Betelgeuse 😘; he made mention of this 🙊🙉 So again; take this video down now Did I mention zero friction lubricants or magnetic suspended bearings. What about new rare metals and materials that cool with friction; I think I've said to much... Again, take this video down now. :Copy and pasted:

This isnt a mechanical battery, as much as a mechanical capacitor.

He's probably watched the "Top Gun" movie intro too many times.

@@skunkbucket9408 duh duh, duh duh, duhduhduhduhduh

@@s-t-f Don't think, it doesn't suit you.

Life goals.

😂

it will not. the weight of the flywheel also gyroscopic loss makes the car inefficient.

They would need at least two flywheels spinning in opposite directions to cancel out the gyroscopic forces

@@mackchris5451 no... it would make it even heavier also I mean the losses when you turn the car the flywheel will lose energy from that rotation.

@@thehemmo5078 I think it's supposed to just be a joke

They already did it in a bus so why not

that would be perferct energy source for helicopter/airplanes ... lol

Releasing tons of energy all at once is called, an explosion

@@mr.personhumanson6871 This made me rofl. :D

Imagine sitting with something similar to that between your thighs while traveling around 200 MPH. Ever wonder why modern top fuel dragsters have the drivers cockpit located forward of the engine? They weren’t always like that you know. Do an image search using “front engine dragster cockpit” and you will get the idea.

@kcotte59 the news stories on it can be found on Google if you search: poway ca flywheel explosion

forgot to put them on roids

A pig could pass as a giant gerbil !

You should put "Nobel prize laureate Dr. Al Gore" to spin the wheel !!!

You could do the same thing egypt has done and use humans in your flywheel. They used human driven wheels to move a disk and cut stone blocks with it. Just like climing a ladder, but the ladder is infinite.

New technology and genetic engineering now have hampsters you required.you missed out by half a year.sorry I've now patented this new powerful species but I would be happy to have you work along side with me for the domination of the world of power

Just like electric basically but even simpler I think. Yeah they'll come with brake pads but the spring can also be the brake if some geniuses that can design simply and reliably can get their hands on it.

Storing energy as mechanical energy in the form of a flywheel is genius. I particularly like the applications for the system in space. If we were to ever make it in space I believe this would play a huge role in storing mass amoumts electricity. A solar forge. Sweet sweet imagination eh?

Hold on a low resistance hydrogen filled chamber? Excuse me? Maybe he's talking about helium?

@@avatar1867 -- Hydrogen is widely used for this purpose, even filling the enclosures of giant electric generators. Hydrogen is cheaper than Helium and has higher speed of sound (higher heat transfer) at a given temperature. There is zero explosion hazard as long as no Oxygen is mixed in. So keep the enclosures slightly pressurized!

10hrs spin post input..(?) -Not possible, were Earth also spinning (_______F.E.______)

@@YodaWhat Interesting. I feel this would have great potential done in space itself. However there is tons of radiation in space. utilizing that itself could be very good no?

Please do research and make videos about this topics fitsmallbusiness.com/hottest-emerging-tech-jobs-2019/ Top 30 topics/ideas I want you to talk about in your future videos in this new UKposts channel "New Mind": 1. Graphene Battery 2. Nanotechnology 3. Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning. 4. The three levels of artificial intelligence 1. Weak or Narrow Artificial Intelligence 2. Strong A.I. 3. Super Artificial Intelligence 5. Quantum Computers 6. Artificial Intelligent Robots 7. Autonomous Machines 8. Blockchain Technology 9. Bitcoin 10. Hacking and Cryptography 11. 5G, 6G, 7G, and beyond. 5G New Radio Network. 12. Big Data 13. Cloud Computing 14. Parallel Computing 15. Geospatial Drone Technology 16. BioNanotechnology (biology and nanotechnology) 17. Tachyon (Faster-than-light-particles)(hypothetical particles) 18. Alcubierre warp drive (10 times faster than the speed of light) www.universetoday.com/89074/what-is-the-alcubierre-warp-drive/ 19. Nuclear Fusion 20. Space-Based Solar Power 21. Bio-fuels 22. CERN. Large Hadron Collider. Antimatter 23. Dark Energy 24. Dark Matter 25. Quantum Supremacy (Google Tech company) 26. Quantum Mechanics 27. Quantum Teleportation 28. Quantum Time Traveling 29. Interdimensional Travel 30. Interstellar Space Travel

Your renewable energy wind turbines are killing thousands of birds and bats. Do you not care? You Alt-right Nazis care nothing about the environment.

@@frankm3214 Your non-renewable coal power plants are killing thousands of people and animals. Do you not care? You Alt-right Nazis care nothing for people. edit: by air pollution

@Frank M Killing birds is better than killing humans. Still, we have to improve on this, but if you choose bats / birds over humans, you're in a special kind of stupid.

@DunnickFayuro ALL species are equal you Right wing Nazis!

*What's cool is -- this is the kind of channel that'd attract viewers who'd just know that*

A true magnetic bearing has to be reinforced with a form of current so the reenergizing does not deplete the magnet .

If you were able to cool it down enough, could you use superconductors to mitigate those losses?

Yes, as was shown in the vidy but it has limits related to the requirement for cooling. Advances in materials are possible that may need less cooling.

thud, the second you said “vidy” is the second you stopped sounding smart.

Some mobile systems have two counter rotating flywheels. Their gyroscopic effects exactly cancel out in normal operation. Obviously, there are some interesting failure modes, if the control system fails to run them in sync, or if the system gets bent out of alignment. Many of those cylindrical containment vessels were housing pairs of flywheels.

Or even when taking a turn! This was actually a problem with these busses. That's why experiments with these busses were stopped in my country.

@@hamjudo Well the internal stress would also be quite insane, I don't know how they manage this on the F1, do they just point the axis straight up to minimize change in axis of rotation?

Jochem Bonarius Well, when the Bus is turning left or right, the axis of rotation of the bus and the flywheels axis coincide. So there would be no effect on the bus. Another effect however, and a quite useful one at that, was, that the bus wouldn‘t tip into a ditch if one wheel went over the ledge.

Gyroscopic precession baby

Makes you wonder why we must ground towers to the earth, or else?

we should put a big generator on earth and get some of that energy

Howard Adams no it doesn’t, if you know even basic electronics you know why week ground things to the earth, It’s the same reason lightning strikes the ground

@@electrichanoi7244 as long as you understand

And we can use that energy too ukposts.info/have/v-deo/nKGopIeYqah12J8.html

wow that's weird and cool

The energy capacity must have been egregious.

Sounds about right.

Because it is.

kamil wojcik not really

@@kamilthegreat2834 will eventually replace the power grid.

Yep, and let nature do the work through seasons. Yeah, we understand this. Every stream and river could be made to hydroelectric. Most hydro stations in the country are operating at a fraction of their capacity, and most all are nearly a century old. ....you don't think the powers at be realized how easily they could power the country from hydro a century ago. The results were so alarming, it was killed. All the concrete went towards our national road system; also almost a century old now....

@@robh467 dam.

The location is the only problem. You cannot move hydro projects nor place them near hospitals and other places that require backup power. If the transmission from the hydro project to the rest of the grid goes, you're fucked.

@@HSFY2012 you could build above sea level, and use sea water

I have been thinking a top container bottom container set up if no access to dams. One container at the top of the hill, one at the bottom, 50mm pipe and hopefully off the shelf turbine. Solar pumped back up the hill till you need the energy again

Exactly my thought as well. Worth researching for feasibility.

It's not possible to use it for anything that's not "sitting in place", or moving in a straight line, because the higher the energy in a flywheel, the more energy it takes to accelerate/decelerate it in any direction. It can be used for your house for storing limited amounts of solar energy for sure, but not anything like a "mechanical battery" for cars.

But you could let the flywheel maintain its axis of rotation by allowing others axis points connected to the flywheel’s axis in three dimensional space, like a gyroscope toy, to rotate in the frame of the car’s rotation. Second: I am not sure if gyroscope force are affected by centrifugal force, which would mean a cars change in direction has no effect on the gyroscopic forces.

Moving vehicles have tanks full of highly flammable liquid, massive lithium ion batteries and high speed reciprocating pistons. All dangerous if not managed properly. Flywheels are perfectly safe in moving vehicles if mounted appropriately in containment housings.

@@glennobiero6775 if you would drive left/right, that axis won't affect the flywheel at all, but what about a speedbump? Due to gyroscopic forces it will exert a force on the car! If you have two counterrotating flywheels, they would cancel out each others gyroscopic precession!

I can understand.. Same with me for Flow batteries, aluminum Air batteries and My fav of all Pumped Hydro batteries. So far Flow batteries Has proven it's a worthy successor for li batteries.

Little different, capacitors have a quick charge/discharge rate. These are more comparable to chemical batteries, calling them mechanical batteries is probably the most accurate description. It would be cool to see the RC curve of a flywheel versus that of a capacitor

Flywheels are actually the mechanical analog of an inductive load as opposed to a capacitor which is more similar to a spring.

Some? A LOT of our watches have them. Every watch without a battery. Every clock.

@@jamesbizs think he meant instead of winding it up at certain time with the winder to load the spring but winding it up automatically by your arm movement as you went about your business.

@W Winterheart Tissot, Omega, and Seiko had watches in which rotation was used to load a battery. I have a Tissot PR 100 Autoquartz.

@@DietmarEugen funny thing is the movements are all by ETA and cost about £30. One haas to wonder where the other £469.99 comes from, the cases are mostly just stainless and plate…

Although to be fair the Seiko are pretty darn good and made in house if memory serves.

It will most likely be especially useful in space power plants - weightlessness makes magnetic suspension easier and the system can be shielded from heat, meaning cryo is easier as well.

@@HadzabadZa good points although would there be problems with moving satalite around due gyroscopic forces?

@@veronicathecow I would assume you don't have to move an entire power plant satellite around, just its active components (I'm thinking this ukposts.info/have/v-deo/qV19pqBqbH6Uw4U.html) like mirrors or the transmitter. However there might be a need to rotate it if the orbit isn't on the same plane as the ecliptic, because otherwise the radiators will get exposed. Yeah, the gyro forces are the trickiest part, but I think the benefits outweigh that little nuisance.

Yes! Hadn't thought of those. I had a few myself. Same principle.

Or the rip cord Evel Knieval motorcycle toy that would fly across the yard from a single pull!

We had an idea we put a bike on its center stand pedaled as fash as we could and charged the little cars. We would imagine them wizzing accross the street... We didn know about torque... They just flipped. But then some kid had the "brilliant" idea of puting that charged car in my hair... :)))

Those were usually spring powered.

The ones you wound up by pulling back were spring powered. There was another type with wheels geared to a flywheel that you spun up by pushing in one direction for a bit then letting it go.

And Mr Spock would say "fascinating"! Please provide a link for you info

@@JohnSmith-eo5sp here you go ukposts.info/have/v-deo/g4B7q4Cdm7CBmqM.html

Please do research and make videos about this topics fitsmallbusiness.com/hottest-emerging-tech-jobs-2019/ Top 30 topics/ideas I want you to talk about in your future videos in this new UKposts channel "New Mind": 1. Graphene Battery 2. Nanotechnology 3. Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning. 4. The three levels of artificial intelligence 1. Weak or Narrow Artificial Intelligence 2. Strong A.I. 3. Super Artificial Intelligence 5. Quantum Computers 6. Artificial Intelligent Robots 7. Autonomous Machines 8. Blockchain Technology 9. Bitcoin 10. Hacking and Cryptography 11. 5G, 6G, 7G, and beyond. 5G New Radio Network. 12. Big Data 13. Cloud Computing 14. Parallel Computing 15. Geospatial Drone Technology 16. BioNanotechnology (biology and nanotechnology) 17. Tachyon (Faster-than-light-particles)(hypothetical particles) 18. Alcubierre warp drive (10 times faster than the speed of light) Starship. www.universetoday.com/89074/what-is-the-alcubierre-warp-drive/ 19. Nuclear Fusion 20. Space-Based Solar Power 21. Bio-fuels 22. CERN. Large Hadron Collider. Antimatter 23. Dark Energy 24. Dark Matter 25. Quantum Supremacy (Google Tech company) 26. Quantum Mechanics 27. Quantum Teleportation 28. Quantum Time Traveling 29. Interdimensional Travel 30. Interstellar Space Travel

@@Mnerd7368 Excuse me, but could you kindly make your own comment, not responding to mine for no reason?

I just did some calculation on this: A 2-meter cube of steel (assuming 7.5g/cm3 density) lifted to a height of 60 meters would provide 9800 watt-hours (9.8kWh) of energy at 100% efficiency. (7.5g/cm^3 * 8,000,000cm^3 * 1kg/1000g) * 9.8m/s * 60m = 35280000kgm^2/s^2 [...then] * 1h/3600s = 9600kgm^2/s^3 Assuming you needed 2kW over an 8-hour night (16kWh), and you made your weight out of lead (11.34g/cm3), you would need a 2-meter-cubed weight of lead lifted to a height of ~51 meters - plus error margin, since that's assuming 100% efficiency. (Same equation as above, just work in reverse, flip everything over, and cancel out units to solve for meters... the '5m' in the equation above): 16000kgm^2/s^3 * 3600s * 8h * s^2/9.8m * 1/(11.34g/cm^3 * 8,000,000cm^3 * 1kg/1000g) = 51.83m The weight-tower would have to be fairly beefy, and the weight would have to be channeled to eliminate dynamic load (tectonic sway). The connecting cables would have to be fairly beefy as well, and rated for wear. You could weld the weight container together on-site, then place lead blocks inside by hand. That wouldn't be too tough. The last tricky part would be designing the dynamo, and rating its consumable elements for wear. That's a lot of money just to store 16kWh. You could combine the cost of construction and the estimated cost of consumables versus batteries. I'm no fan of the Tesla Yuppie-Hipster-Techno-Grey-Goo-Dystopia, but just comparing raw numbers, a Tesla Powerwall can hold ~13.5kWh (7kW peak output, 5kW continuous, more than enough for a residential house's overnight consumption), lasts for ~12 years (Version 2, at least), and costs ~13K. I think batteries are just too damn efficient for much else to compete... I just want other companies to get their butts in gear so that Ol'Musky has some competition and prices come down.

@@-_----- Thanks for the calculation, much appreciated. I wonder what the price would look like at scale? Water towers hold a lot of weight (even more than your lead example), so I wonder what sort of potential energy they can hold.

​@@Genubath1 Actually, I was surprised by the amount of mass that water towers hold aloft when I actually crunched the numbers... A water tower with a 400,000 gallon capacity held 50 meters aloft = 1,514.16 cubic meters = 1,514,160kg @50 meters (approximating, since not all of the fluid is at that level...) ≈< 206kWh. I still think that the engineering requirements will force us to look for battery-based solutions... but it is interesting to crunch the numbers.

@@-_----- Could you please calculate how efficient this engine can be?. ukposts.info/have/v-deo/nIR6q4mbZIqGkWQ.html

@@elementssolutions5473 Ahh shit, that's way more complex. I'll take a look when I have some downtime.

Your half right............The crank shaft does indeed convert the motion, but the flywheel takes the engines torque pulses and delivers them to the drive train in a smooth and controlled fashion. If the engine was directly bolted to the transmission, driveshaft or torque tube the vibrations would damage and destroy even the most robust drive train components over time. I guess you could think of an engines flywheel like an electrical capacitor. Now a days, dual-mass flywheels take this a step further in manual transmissions as weight/efficiency is now a major factor and durability is reduced in favor or fuel economy. Torque convertors have all but eliminated the torque pulse problem in automatic transmissions due to their fluid coupling drive. The engines harmonic balancer does the same for the auxiliary components, and eliminates the harmonic hum/oscillation of the belt and it's components when running.

@@camerond8176 The converter IS the flywheel, it's mass negates the need for a separate flywheel. Modern converters also lock-up once the vehicle gets up to speed eliminating any effect of the fluid coupling. The harmonic balancer is to reduce oscillations in the twisting of the crankshaft.

Wrong the "Flywheel" does not smooth torque impulses, that's the joke of the harmonic balancer at the front of the crank. and only manual transmission cars (a dying bread in the US :( ) has a true flywheel, all automatics use a flex plate of some sort. The torque converter acts as the rotational mass in automatic cars, the flex plate it there to hold the starter ring (some dodge have the starter ring on the torque converter) and allow flex between the crankshaft and input shaft that's inside the torque convertor

@@TdrSld the harmonic balancer dampens vibration in the crankshaft

Chris Russell torsional vibration damper/harmonic damper with rubber insert is a device to control crank vibration and resonance. “90 deg” thing you talk is secondary order vibration. It’s occur twice per crank revolution due to the cosine effect of the rod and crankshaft. Inline-4 engine with a flatplane crank eliminate this vibration via balance shaft

TeslaKaniv hello tesla

You smell like genious. TESLA

@@minjaekim2074 *genius

There is also a film - Moment of inertia. ukposts.info/have/v-deo/ap2Yemh-m3qi0oU.html But only thing you can rely on - auto-translated auto-created subtitles.

Please do research and make videos about this topics fitsmallbusiness.com/hottest-emerging-tech-jobs-2019/ Top 30 topics/ideas I want you to talk about in your future videos in this new UKposts channel "New Mind": 1. Graphene Battery 2. Nanotechnology 3. Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning. 4. The three levels of artificial intelligence 1. Weak or Narrow Artificial Intelligence 2. Strong A.I. 3. Super Artificial Intelligence 5. Quantum Computers 6. Artificial Intelligent Robots 7. Autonomous Machines 8. Blockchain Technology 9. Bitcoin 10. Hacking and Cryptography 11. 5G, 6G, 7G, and beyond. 5G New Radio Network. 12. Big Data 13. Cloud Computing 14. Parallel Computing 15. Geospatial Drone Technology 16. BioNanotechnology (biology and nanotechnology) 17. Tachyon (Faster-than-light-particles)(hypothetical particles) 18. Alcubierre warp drive (10 times faster than the speed of light) www.universetoday.com/89074/what-is-the-alcubierre-warp-drive/ 19. Nuclear Fusion 20. Space-Based Solar Power 21. Bio-fuels 22. CERN. Large Hadron Collider. Antimatter 23. Dark Energy 24. Dark Matter 25. Quantum Supremacy (Google Tech company) 26. Quantum Mechanics 27. Quantum Teleportation 28. Quantum Time Traveling 29. Interdimensional Travel 30. Interstellar Space Travel

@@Mnerd7368 New to UKposts, huh? Posting a comment directed to the channel creator does no good if it is buried in another comment thread. Why would you post that under this thread?

@@Mnerd7368 I do not make any youtube video's.

I see mistakes happen at sea as well.

@@xenonram except the channel Creator clearly saw OPs message lol

Could/Should be for the world imho

That's basically the definition of a Hybrid.

Of maybe a rubber band powered unit😉

Yep! I've recently found it interesting that gravity storage methods are finding use in "third-world" and poor or remote places, especially for lighting! With today's efficient, cheap, and lightweight (easy to transport to remote areas) LEDs, there are lights that you hang from a roof or ceiling, and then you fill the bag under them with or otherwise attach something heavy, and as is slowly pulls down the energy is converted to light! Then if you turn the light off it stops descending, which blows my mind since it's such a cool way to visualize the transformation of energy!

thanks!

06:51 your welcome

It would be negative, but the less negative the better.

N Marbletoe - I don’t think you understand EROI

@@wombatcitystudios I think I had it wrong, it wouldn't be negative, but it would be less than one. If you put 100 joules in to get the flywheel spinning, and an hour later you get 990 out, and the efficiency would be 99% over that hour. EROI would be 0.99. Is that right?

@@nmarbletoe8210 dude you didn't get what he meant. And you can never put more energy out of a system than you do in that systems. He asked if I have 100 watts to power that system as storage, how much energy can I use a day later (its not possible to be over 100 watt in that case)

@@supercunthunt7756 100 in, 99 out is possible though. ooh crawp I put 990 lol.

Pretty poetic, isn't it? The fundamentals and basics of physics and engineering really are as essential as every teacher/professor would have you believe. 😁

How do you start the fusion reactor? See that big water wheel over there - open the sluice gates.

With added bonus of magnetic data storage!

@@mrmaniac3/videos Voyager 3, powered by gold audio cassette. ;)

That's what's in the video also. They even put them underground 👍

@@simonito1715 I missed the point about steel stripe/tape...

@@user-qv6ud2hx6f I guess the idea was that instead of exploding into pieces, it might just (as it loses integrity) sort of unwind, thus dissipating the energy gradually. That's the way I got it, anyway.

Not only Brazil in Norway they literally generate almost all their power on that way...

@divorcedme I would suggest you look at the actual power output of one of those and compare it to the cost of keeping it running. Then look at virtually anything else that's a viable power source...Also, fish tend to migrate in rivers. Water wheels and turbines make this rather difficult for them.

You gotta keep track of the difference between storage and generation. Some water based accumulators exist, but the energy density of those is pretty low. Hydro-electric generation is a very effective power source, but can of course only be used in countries with big powerful rivers. China has a lot of those. The netherlands... not so much. We have one or two small hydro powerplants that are more symbolic than effective...

@@mfbfreak - China also has 40,000 small hydro installations, there is no need for big powerful rivers.

why exactly?

@@UditDey because of the use case. Flywheels and capacitors are used for short bursts of power

capacitors are batteries

@Robert Pearce what? Like you know everything

Some (if not most) of the energy you'd gain by using a vacuum would have to be used to create and maintain that same vacuum. There was probably a cost-benefit analysis that said h2 is the best compromise between vacuum and normal air.

Just not the turbine type, please. There are other ways that don't chop up marine life. We make life for them hard enough as it is.

You mean reciprocating aircraft engines? Yeah and they still use them today because they are basically car engines with car starters.

@@mistere5857 I was thinking the hand-cranked inertia starters used on some single-engine WW2 fighters.

@@scratchdog2216 oh yeah those are definitely more in line with the principle of a fly wheel as presented in the video

Modern Flywheel systems are much more than 70% efficient

@@exetercollegeuktechnologyc1323 I was not commenting on the flywheel. I was commenting upon regeneration of electricity used to go up hills as vehicles go down hills and the concept of a 'direct' connection to a re-built electric transmission infrastructure. Off topic? Not really as the flywheel has limits.

SunriseLAW Do you mean putting regenerative braking on all cars?

​@@brandonbenjamin9452 Yes, to fill up the capacitors and much-smaller batteries or to put it back into the 'system'. Tesla (e.g.) looks great, they make 300,000 cars while 17 million new and 25 million used cars are sold in USA every year. Obtaining lithium...which is plentiful...and processing it into batteries is not optimal when talking about tens of millions. A semi-hard wired solution makes the vehicles much lighter. Figuratively and metaphorically: The entire system could be built out by melting down what we have and reforming it.

I agree

It wouldn't be a problem as the flywheel is mounted horizontally not vertically (....that would have been an interesting experience).

@@jaihind9043 what if you went up a hill? Would you tip?

@@MilesPrower1992 Tip sideways!!! :D

It has small wheels in the front bumper section. I wonder why :D

It, it's operator and all passengers where never heard from again...the gyro in the bus goes round and round!

KaizokuSencho great book!

Good book... but

@@53jed but what??! Don't leave us hanging!

the apocalypse in the book was based on the idea that the ocean rose because of global warming. Except for that, the rest of the book is plausible. Good good guys, bad guys sufficiently evil, everybody;s flawed in some way.

The wheel was never invented, it was discovered. A round river rock or a fallen tree trunk are both wheels.

A wheel on itself is a disk. A wheel plus an axis do the trick.

@@compfox A large log on its side still serves both of those roles, so long as you're willing to replace the logs at the front of whatever you're rolling as your load rolls forward.

@Norm T Not invented, "Discovered" ... Round rocks and round logs were rolling down hills long before humans were even walking upright. But hey, if you didn't see it- I guess it didn't happen. Just like No bear shits in the woods.

@Norm T Let me guess, you think that man invented fire too don't you. smh