The MOST Gruesome Case Of Bill McGuire | True Crime
Переглядів 69,258
День томуThe MOST Gruesome Case Of Bill McGuire | True Crime
#truecrime #documentary #mystery
❤️🔔Subscribe to our channel (It's Free)🔔❤️ukposts.info/the/ste.html...
As always, please share your views in our comments section below. Also, check out our videos at Mysterious Hook if you'd like to see similar cases. We will be back with a new episode soon. Thank you for watching our video on Mysterious Hook. If you found this video interesting, like our video and subscribe to our channel.
==============================================================================================================================================================
The MOST Gruesome Case Of Bill McGuire | True Crime
#truecrime #documentary #mystery
In a shocking turn of events in April 2004, the remains of Bill McGuire were found dismembered in three suitcases scattered across Chesapeake Bay.
The gruesome discovery sent shockwaves through the community and left investigators baffled. Bill, an ordinary computer programmer, was seemingly well-liked and had no known enemies. His wife, Melanie, an unassuming nurse, was left reeling from the tragedy.
As the investigation unfolded, a web of secrets and hidden relationships began to unravel. The police meticulously pieced together the events leading up to Bill's disappearance, uncovering a trail of deceit and betrayal.
Who could have committed such a heinous act? Was it a random act of violence or a carefully orchestrated plan? Was it someone Bill knew? Was it someone Melanie knew?
The answers to these questions remain elusive, as the "suitcase murder" case continues to haunt the community.
Subscribe to Mysterious Hook to delve deeper into this chilling case and uncover the layers of truth hidden beneath the surface. Don't forget to like, comment, and hit the notification bell for the latest updates on more bone-chilling stories!
References: www.notion.so/REFERENCES-5c01...
The MOST Gruesome Case Of Bill McGuire | True Crime
#truecrime #documentary #mystery
==============================================================================================================================================================
Mysterious Hook is a channel dedicated to all things mystery, including solved and unsolved cold cases, true crime, and more. We make videos investigating cold criminal cases, supernatural incidents, and everything else that cannot be explained. Our main goal is to show you how strange and mysterious the world is...
❤️🔔Subscribe to our channel (It's Free)🔔❤️
==============================================================================================================================================================
Mysterious Hook is a channel dedicated to all things mystery, including solved and unsolved cold cases, true crime, and more. We make videos investigating cold criminal cases, supernatural incidents, and everything else that cannot be explained. Our main goal is to show you how strange and mysterious the world is.....
Any inquiry and Promotion contact us on email:- nbmediamarketers@gmail.com
@abdullahabunayyan-jv7sj 3 місяці тому
Her nonchalant attitude, her smirking,her body language speaks volume plus she didn't report him missing 😢😢
@BriBri9380 4 місяці тому
I can't imagine how a human being can do that to another human being. Too disturbing..and i wouldn't wish this on anyone.
@MikadoYuma 4 місяці тому
Yet we as humans do similar things to animals every day.
@josephprovencher6345 4 місяці тому
@@MikadoYumaThat IS true and sad also.
@josephprovencher6345 4 місяці тому
It's appalling BriBri, I couldn't agree more.
@johndonahue3509 4 місяці тому
That's. The problem.... PPL don't need to understand.. UNDERSTAND THEY ARE ALL OVER AND NEED TO BE Locked UP Away FROM OUR KIDS FOREVER
@see-rious-ley 3 місяці тому
Crocodile tears on a very unconvincing suspect.
@als897 4 місяці тому
so, she says she goes to Atlantic City, knows exactly which Casino he is at and happens to locate his car among thousands of vehicles and says she did a 'Mission Impossible' and was able to disable the car to get into it but NEVER states how she got in whether using a hanger, tool kit, breaking the window and then states she would drive the car somewhere he would find it hard to locate, yet how would he know it was moved by her and not expect him to call the cops the car is stolen. And even if she did move the car, how was she able to return to her own car? Why did the interviewer ask her this? And then says she hates the guy but gets him what he wants, a gun.
@richardneedham13 4 місяці тому
Nobody else had a motive. Did she report his disappearance? Did she ever call or try to communicate with him after that day? Frequently it turns out that an absence of evidence is pretty damning in itself... Also, she obviously either did it or has knowledge of what happened. She's so fake.
@altheamclean 4 місяці тому
I'm not fighting you on your opinion but nobody knows what's really going on in other people relationship no matter what they show on the outside so she must have her reasons why she don't report him missing not carring about somebody where abouts and having a affair don't make a person a murderer so if they are going to lock up the woman show the hard evidence and not use affair extra as a excuse to prison someone .
@Robin_Coffins 4 місяці тому
how the hell did she get rid of the body? She's so tiny! I'm curious about where that animal hair came from and dammit, I want answers. Maybe with how fantastic forensic technology is now, answers will be had!
@lilliebrown6320 15 днів тому
No motive? The man was Addicted to gambling. And it was Said that he would just up and leave for days at a time. Why would she call and have him reported missing? It could be that she figured he was off gambling once again. And gambling is a dangerous thing to be a part of, things tend to go wrong. The jury had plenty of Reasonable Doubt, she should not have been convicted. No evidence whatsoever. Only assumptions. In my own opinion.
@lilliebrown6320 15 днів тому
@@altheamcleanExactly. She should not have been convicted, there was plenty of Reasonable Doubt!!
@altheamclean 15 днів тому
@@lilliebrown6320 yup
@aym280 4 місяці тому
Why didn't she report him missing? She might have used insulin to immobilise her husband and someone else cut him up. Sad, should have just walked away! No point keep saying she didn't look like a killer. Just because she is photogenic doesn't mean she is no killer. People saying she doesn't look like a killer suffer from lookism!
@Kopyrda 4 місяці тому
Or just being a female. I don't remember any other case when man would be so vehemently defended in such circumstances. Well, maybe OJ. But it was all about supposed "racism".
@nadagabri5783 4 місяці тому
“She said her goal was to annoy him” MISSION ACCOMPLISHED just by showing her smug mug.
@douglassmith4004 4 місяці тому
I think she did it. No one else would have. Her driving to go " furniture shopping" EXACTLY right after he disappeared. Hmmmmm
@ApolloFreya 4 місяці тому
She more than likely had help from someone else She has that look of a guilty person for sure. We know she had her doctor bit on the side it’s not difficult to work out
@PennEsmeyaz 4 місяці тому
Cult data found those missing Native American women #MMIW -------- #Durangocide -------- 💀🪶=T👕 $$$
@Robin_Coffins 4 місяці тому
captain hindsight over here "She has that look of a guilty person for sure"
@AziaVenom 3 місяці тому
Thays exactly what I commented.
@taniamayer5125 4 місяці тому
What do the two women claiming she is innocent think about her search history on the computer? Her search history proves to me is is guilty 100%
@cynicannkeel8899 4 місяці тому
I don't get how the couple could even be considering buying a half million dollar house when Bill supposedly was gambling their money away, running up gambling debts. Then Melanie says they had a bunch of cash to use as a down-payment for an expensive house. I find it questionable the woman could have committed the murder and dismember her husband alone, but hard to say what a determined, angry person can do.
@tbug8470 4 місяці тому
🎵You can do it when you B&Q it🎵 (U.K hardware store) she probably used an electric saw.😵💫🤢
@hazelhadley-britt6396 4 місяці тому
Females have historically dismembered bodies.
@gaylegoodman9097 4 місяці тому
The lawyer's that think she's innocent, made some really good points.
@Kopyrda 4 місяці тому
At the same time ignoring all others. As others pointed out: "so, she says she goes to Atlantic City, knows exactly which Casino he is at and happens to locate his car among thousands of vehicles and says she did a 'Mission Impossible' and was able to disable the car to get into it but NEVER states how she got in whether using a hanger, tool kit, breaking the window and then states she would drive the car somewhere he would find it hard to locate, yet how would he know it was moved by her and not expect him to call the cops the car is stolen". All of that just to piss off a guy who, as she claimed herself, she was afraid of. Dunno about you, but if I was a woman afraid that my husband, who I filed restraining order against, may hurt me, I wouldn't do anything to escalate his fury. "I don't get how the couple could even be considering buying a half million dollar house when Bill supposedly was gambling their money away, running up gambling debts". "Nobody else had a motive. Did she report his disappearance? Did she ever call or try to communicate with him after that day?"
@birdieorourke5507 2 місяці тому
Good points...@@Kopyrda
@shiftymack5197 4 місяці тому
Crazy...I live right by Chesapeake Bay Bridge tunnel and never heard of this.
@jenniferlyons4150 4 місяці тому
I feel bad for the kids. They lost both parents. 😢
@clare1971 4 місяці тому
Always feel so sorry for the person who has to remove the poor body
@patrickbroaden9820 3 місяці тому
Speechless....this was a good 1...
@MCBRUCE76 4 місяці тому
Even the word diabolical seems too small for her character, behavior, and thought process. She never reported her husband missing. Instead of reporting her husband missing, she went ahead and filed for divorce, because she very well knew he will not come to fight the divorce case, because she killed him. She planned the whole scheme, just too perfect to fit everything like jigsaw puzzle pieces. Bill goes missing right after they brought the property, any morron with two brain cells can see through her lies. Bill was not abusive, but more like a spoiled brat with sudden outbursts, based on the witness statements from friends and family. She was having affairs with a Doctor and trying to get her old crush into the drama. Her interview says it all, any psychologist would have tagged her narcissist and a sociopath without much effort. She targeted rich men for sure. I don't think this is her first crime though, she seems to be well versed and calm about whatever she did. Man she first got bailed for $750k, and then for $2.5 million, how was she able to arrange that kind of money. Shows how well prepared and proactive she was about this thing. Great job by the jurors and the judge, for sentencing her to 65 years in prison without the possibility of parole. My sincere condolences to Bill's parents and loved ones. May Bill's soul Rest in Peace.
@blakmomba7923 Місяць тому
“What’s inside? The baddest you can imagine “😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@marthacjimenez7506 4 місяці тому
She did it shes only crying for herself because she got caught fake tears
@kelleyniswonger3499 4 місяці тому
Could have got the suitcases at goodwill and someone else could have helped her.. Only her and God know the truth( and the person who may have helped her). Just my thoughts
@ebonimom6964 4 місяці тому
That's what i was thinking.
@lawrieadam 4 місяці тому
I can't imagine how she was found guilty with no physical evidence. I'm sure she did it but there is no evidence to anything. Why it concerns me is all the crazy cases that wind up being true. As much as it sucks she shouldn't have been found guilty. Our opinions shouldn't matter. The facts don't line up enough with what we've been told here.
@ItsNeverAManequin 4 місяці тому
I agree. No blood, no tissue, no DNA (hers on him, or his in her house). The bullets not being tested. The unreliable trash bag claim. Neighbors not hearing anything. Animal hairs when she didn't own an animal. Also, LE not following any gambling debt/loan shark angles... This is sadly another case of a jury that didn't understand 'beyond a reasonable doubt'.
@hazelhadley-britt6396 4 місяці тому
Men are convicted with no physical evidence every day. Circumstantial evidence.
@taniamayer5125 3 місяці тому
I think it was her search history on the computer that proves to me she did it. I mean who just randomly looks up that stuff and their husbands get murdered?
@Vittnes 25 днів тому
The search on Internet (historic), the bed sheet from the clinic where she worked, the chloro-hydrate bottle with a prescription from her boss and lover... his signature forged (by her), this little bottle in a suitcase... the suitcases... A BUNCH OF EVIDENCES!
@JQuaylin 3 місяці тому
Im no expert but the neck scratch,head tilt and averting her eyes when she says he could've broken my jaw if a closed fist was a flat out lie! She isn't very convincing on my end.
@ericcontreras1454 4 місяці тому
she had help.. definite.. she knew exactly where the car was. probably went to wipe it. bought a house right before.. was already cheating.
@iby53 3 місяці тому
In my opinion it could have been a gambling debt that he could not pay of and there's some ruthless people out there and his wife has got the blame because they had arguments and she had a affair.
@chrissmith6919 4 місяці тому
She might have done it but theres not that much evidence probably to convict her. And gambling debts can cause all kinds of problems including loans from shady characters not paid
@Kopyrda 4 місяці тому
In one of the other cases judge said something like: "Circumstantial evidence is like rope strings. You cannot count on a single rope string to pull something, but when you have enough of them you can make a rope which can do that". As others pointed out: "so, she says she goes to Atlantic City, knows exactly which Casino he is at and happens to locate his car among thousands of vehicles and says she did a 'Mission Impossible' and was able to disable the car to get into it but NEVER states how she got in whether using a hanger, tool kit, breaking the window and then states she would drive the car somewhere he would find it hard to locate, yet how would he know it was moved by her and not expect him to call the cops the car is stolen". "I don't get how the couple could even be considering buying a half million dollar house when Bill supposedly was gambling their money away, running up gambling debts". "Nobody else had a motive. Did she report his disappearance? Did she ever call or try to communicate with him after that day?"
@sadielevens1144 4 місяці тому
❤❤❤❤❤
@vijilakshmi754 3 місяці тому
Wat about finding out who bought the suitcase or investigate the suitcase angle.
@jmaxim917 4 місяці тому
They are having a hard time believing that someone looking like themselves could have done this. Had she been blk or brown...
@arvettadelashmit9337 4 місяці тому
He liked to gamble. Someone may have killed him (because of his debts to them). Bill's wife may have had nothing to do with his murder. However, two wrongs will never make it right. I just can't see how a small woman could have done this by herself. He was spiteful; and, she was spiteful. Her spiteful acts, like moving his car, made her look guilty.
@price-singspuccini6124 4 місяці тому
The man was chopped into pieces!
@kol2han 4 місяці тому
I read her face that shes innocent
@price-singspuccini6124 4 місяці тому
Well that’s definitive!@@kol2han
@jefferyhodges8835 3 місяці тому
Women are just as capable of murder as men! But her search history, and moving that car, was enough evidence to convict her.
@richardneedham13 4 місяці тому
Bill was always responsible and financially secure (if you can just move past the gambling addiction...)
@ross-bv5im 4 місяці тому
She was exaggerating the gambling, looks guilty as sin, where she belongs
@annesadac 3 місяці тому
Ikr. Investigators find that bill is just an occasional gambler. Not a heavy gambler
@gracebella02 4 місяці тому
She is guilty.
@kekaeva750 4 місяці тому
I do think she did herself. But I do believe she was involved.
@nathanieldrake6658 23 дні тому
Interesting how this goes on and on about his supposed addiction leading up to his death but not mentioning the affair she was having-if it was that simple she would have had a decent shot at manslaughter and could be out on the street today
@rogercardenas8764 3 місяці тому
🙏
@stevesmith-pp3de 2 місяці тому
I dont believe she can lift even one of the suitcases by herself (maybe the one containing the legs) she must have had an accomplice
@davidhudson9269 4 місяці тому
She's guilty.
@douglassmith4004 4 місяці тому
Everyone that reads this I lived in Vegas gambled a little nut will never again. Do not gamble EVER. THE HOUSE ALWAYS WINS. Your ONLY losing.
@cheerlynstovall5506 3 місяці тому
Why would they purchase a new home,if they were having financial problems?
@kicnbac 4 місяці тому
She either didn't do it or had help. I wouldn't have convicted her.
@nkululekomasilonkululeko4426 4 місяці тому
this is an unfair trial and conviction. judges are human too.
@judithsullivan9703 4 місяці тому
I'm sympathetic towards her predicament with a gambling addict who was spending as much as she could earn. My first thought was a loan shark. Why didn't they investigate that possibility?
@lilliebrown6320 15 днів тому
I didn't hear any evidence whatsoever that would say it was her! However, her husband was a Gambler, a big gambler!! It sounds more likely that he probably owed money for gambling. Or he won and it ticked off whoever he beat. While none of this was even spoken of, I couldn't help but think about the fact that he was addicted to gambling and that NEVER goes well! I just don't believe she did it, at least she didn't do it by herself! But on her own?? No way! She should be given a new trial or she should have that sentence set aside and freed from prison. No evidence means there should be no conviction. No witnesses, no conviction. No murder weapon, no conviction. I just can't see how the jury didn't have Reasonable Doubt!!
@anitaevans5361 4 місяці тому
Is that Joe Tacopina as Melanie's attorney?
@avangelinewolf7220 3 місяці тому
I think she did or was definitely involved!
@marshallmuyembi7537 3 місяці тому
She did not report him missing which shows that she is guilty
@salllu 3 місяці тому
They should looked at his last movements in the Casino might he had won substantil amount of money and was chased by some thugs or scumbags.....
@gaylegoodman9097 4 місяці тому
She could of fought Brad, she just didn't want to. 😠😠😠😠😠
@scotiancoast4498 2 місяці тому
She probably did do it but I don't know how they got a conviction with no evidence. Idk maybe there's some missing information.
@userrrrrxx135 4 місяці тому
He was gambling. She was cheating.
@richardneedham13 4 місяці тому
"diverse cultures blend seamlessly" lied the narrator...
@alikamaule1867 3 місяці тому
They got the right monster in prison don't believe this monster
@coreyholmes1980 4 місяці тому
Unpopular opinion: what do they do with all those suitcases? Cause those are expensive and I need some
@evalynewanjiru9685 3 місяці тому
There is a chance that shes not guilty 😢😢this wrong conviction happens
@rebekah9110 Місяць тому
I don't believe this woman is guilty. I noticed some comments regarding her failure to report him missing. Well, he was known to take off and go gambling. I wouldn't have reported him missing at that point either. Actually, I'd have been relieved of his absence due to the dryer sheet incidents and physical abuse. As for a motive, I don't think she was the only one who could've had one. I believe the detectives zoned in on her with their tunnel vision. Why not? She was easy prey for them and they're always pressed, by media, the public and their superiors to get cases solved asap. I didn't hear anything in this video regarding an investigation into the history of her husband's gambling addiction other than the fact he gambled. Did he have a huge gambling debt with someone and where did all of the animal hair come from? Not her and there was no evidence of a dismemberment in her apartment. No blood, tissue or bone fragments. So, where was she when she purportedly cut him into pieces? Doing that creates a huge mess with DNA literally everywhere, including the plumbing pipes, yet her home yielded nothing. Whoever killed this man had a calico cat or a brindle dog. To sum my comment up, I truly believe it is IMPOSSIBLE to receive a fair trial on this planet. Here's why: years ago, before the internet, cellphones and all of the possibilities we have today regarding communication, any news available we received from our TV or a newspaper. They would contain information regarding the local community in most instances. So, to have heard about some heinous crime that happened miles away or in a different state was not common. During that time, if a defense attorney requested a trial be moved to another county due to media involvement and the possibility of an unfair trial, it usually would be. People in other counties more than likely had no knowledge of anything occurring miles away. That would result in a jury who were completely UNBIASED. They would then have to listen to all of the evidence to make their decision. That's not possible today. With social media, selecting jury members who have no knowledge of whoever is on trial, is not going to happen. Not only is the person on trial blasted everywhere, there are conflicting opinions of "experts", murder scene details with pictures and the murderers history available for all. How can a person possibly have a fair trial when everyone, everywhere has access to all of that information with some of it being untrue? Most of it could be false for all we know. This I know: If I ever find myself in such a terrible situation as this woman, I would prefer a judge decide my fate. One, hopefully level-headed judge versus twelve undoubtedly biased people makes a lot more sense to me.
@pretty_kitty 4 місяці тому
All on some serious sus circumstantial evidence. WOW. So much for a fair trial.
@Urlocalteardrop 3 місяці тому
Did they figure out where the luggage came from?
@jmednerth1623 2 місяці тому
From her own home as well as the bags, the blanket from her clinic, the Rx she forged from her clinic and tried to have Parkway erase tolls on her license plate.
@Leifmommy 3 місяці тому
Life is over and prison time Freedom is gone No can do it Love life and can't live without my son besides me Stay out trouble people eh
@bensantellano 4 місяці тому
She's guilty it's obvious
@nadagabri5783 4 місяці тому
Ok I admit I’m skipping through this old ancient story YET she was found guilty on what evidence ? ? ? even though her smug mug is so despicable and annoying what evidence?
@johndonahue3509 4 місяці тому
Diversity is the opposite of mutual..WE look to FIND MUTUAL LIKES AND INTERESTS IN OUR FRIENDS AND MATES... DIVERSITY IS OUR WEAKNESS...IT SERVES THE POWERFUL THATS IT!!!!
@socaldeb 4 місяці тому
If this guy was wiping out their personal finances for his extreme gambling addiction and had no way to replenish their accounts, didn't anyone consider the possibility that he also had aged in "personal loans" from bad guys? Perhaps those loans became due, and loan sharks do what loan sharks do best. His private personal issues running concurrently with their marital problems when he ends up gave cops and prosecuters the opportunity to do what THEY do best, target the low hanging fruit. She, is who they could get so they could clap each other on the back. If this was true, and if they went after the other possibile assailants, this case would likely have gone cold. No clapping each other on the back. No champagne, no closed case. Who knows, maybe she is guilty, but ???
@ChancetheCanine 4 місяці тому
I tend to think you idea carries a lot of creedance!
@Snipewoods69 4 місяці тому
She know she is
@judithsullivan9703 4 місяці тому
I agree with your theory. He wasn't a responsible person to begin with and was spending as much as she could earn. My first thought was a loan shark as well.Why didn't they investigate that possibility?
@hazelhadley-britt6396 4 місяці тому
Interesting that they were able to buy a house just before his death with such bad finances....?
@silverado1810 4 місяці тому
Suitcases? Hairs not matching? Possible she bough second hand store suitcases? Less to zero dna of hers? Idk 🤔
@TheCascarabia 3 місяці тому
How many pairs of legs did he have?
@TheCascarabia 3 місяці тому
1st suitcase a pair of legs 2nd the rest of the body and 3rd a pelvis and another pair of legs?
@pamithequeen 4 місяці тому
Too many things without explanation here. I don’t think she should have been convicted
@garyshannon4798 4 місяці тому
No way can she be considered guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Should have been given not guilty.
@julievorensky8250 14 днів тому
No puzzle here. Just a slew of pod-casters trying to make money off her bs claims of innocence. FYI, there was never any evidence that he was a "degenerate gambler." Evidence--there's the rub.
@esterrios3998 3 місяці тому
She was unfairly charged. If she had a hand in it, she had help. I pray she will be cleared and soon.
@wrangelinhabitant161 4 місяці тому
No pity for gamblers. Sorry. I had an awful experience. He is absolutely guilty of not being ready to get rid of that awful addiction in spite of having children he should had been providing for!!!
@sauce1232 4 місяці тому
I'm all ok to respecting the victims obviously. But as a true crime channel you should not paint them as "kind people who always help other blabla". You never know the truth about people's private life. Maybe he was raping cats in his basement. How many time have we heard people saying how great their neighbor was before discovering he was a serial killer. Please remain neutral about stuff you don't know about.
@Kopyrda 4 місяці тому
I think it's typical for most of the true crime channels like that. It almost always begins like that. I guess it's supposed to make us feel sorry for the victims, so we would become more invested in the history of their demise. Still, I'm also a little sick of that.
@irissander5266 3 місяці тому
That’s what I always says not in this particular case but any cases. They start by saying she/he is so kind, never done this or that etc…. I know they should state the fact about ppl not sugarcoat the victim just because they’re dead.
@sauce1232 3 місяці тому
@@irissander5266 Yeah it's seems victims in true crime videos are always angel on earth with pure heart 😅
@AziaVenom 3 місяці тому
She had helped, period.
@moeshonestreviews6958 3 місяці тому
Even thought she had motive could it be possible he owned someone money for gambling? Didn’t the ex wife know about his gambling as well!? For her to be a nurse and be struggling with bills he had to be blowing a lot of money 🫤
Апостроф TV
Переглядів 930 тис.
Oscar's Funny World
Переглядів 37 млн
Odyssey - Ancient History Documentaries
Переглядів 9 млн
Mysterious Hook
Переглядів 388 тис.
єПитання з Лесею Нікітюк
Переглядів 108 тис.
Next-cinema
Переглядів 2,3 млн