Is it free shipping on Amazon?

i didn’t get free shipping 😅 but i had one yesterday at least

😂

I think we'll see free listing/shipping of your chosen kidney to sell for it

Some what 🤨

@@Planet-Animelmfao

you pay more so americans can pay less,

Yeah the MSI costs $949 in the US and the ASUS costs $1,299 Meanwhile here in Norway the equivalent exchange is $1,700 for the MSI and $1,800 for the ASUS.

@@thomasandersr in the Uk where I live asus is 1350£ and msi 1300£. I don't understand why in Europe the prices are just to high man. Like with that money you could of buy a tv oled 4k, a good laptop or something else. It's just a f monitor + they don't have 2.1 dp.

Agree with you, they are so expensive they cost the price of some previous gen OLED 65" TV. My theory is it's more expensive over here because EU has a mandatory 2 years warranty on new product sold.The cheapest I can find here in Belgium (when available) is 1515€ (1631$). USA show prices without taxes, the highest average combined state and local sales tax rates is Louisiana with 9.86%. Which gives 1299$ + 9.86% = 1417$ Yes, that's in the most taxed states. It can go as low as 0 but that's an exception (only 4 states). Eyeballing it, the national average is around 6% or ~1 377$, so one could conclude that the ~254$ dollars difference left between me and the average US citizen, went... in a 2 years mandatory product warranty.

@@Oxygen.O2 true ma men + I'm not in a rush right now . I'm gonna wait a little longer to buy a 4k oled monitor or just go and buy the alienware which is much cheaper like 400£.

Copium

naaaaah i had it it has terrible hdr

@@QwertzQwertz-hs5fn which one?

@@MrM-dl5zm samsung neo g8 4k

Had a few of these but i never coukd get past the scanlines issues. Once i noticed them i couldnt unsee them

AW3225QF here , not seeing any flickering with gsync.

@@hnguyen2120 really? Even when it’s really dark grey?

@@giulioparisa8794 yeah u had me worried so i tested on my own aw3225qf don't see it and im looking for it really hard

it will look clean with vesa mount arm

They are practically the same all use the same panel from Samsung

@@nighthawk4933 I figured but I wanted to make sure one didn't have blacker blacks/ whiter whites or one having a better overall picture/ colors or performance.

He won't tell you anything bad about the monitor. This is a promotional video.

It's polished concrete from somewhere on Etsy (weighs a ton) and UKpostsr-spec Ikea Alex drawers.

you be waiting till end of 2025

@@jaye6450 A year and a half then. Not bad if you already have a decent monitor, and really prefer a 27 inch 4K OLED option. 163 ppi will be nice.

anything less than 32 inches is a waste for 4k

@@mint3 yup. only people who didn't research properly will buy a 27inch 4k

4K/UHD on 27 inch means you will need massive scaling in Windows. It is not really good for most people. 27" sweetspot is 1440p. 4K/UHD sweet spot is 32" for monitors that is. You will see little to no 27 inch monitors use a 4K panel outside of monitors made for design and work.

Would if I had time! Sure there's loads of stuff out there

It's new, it'll be that way for at least 6 more months probably. Once those 27' versions happen it'll be fine.

That monitor not sold out atleast not here

$2400 on eBay….

@@gaz6329 you can get an 85-in Samsung neo 4K mini LED TV for cheaper than this. I'm going to wait.

ya its still sold out, 2400 on Amazon. but even if ur paying msrp, with tax ur gonna be paying1500 which is way too much rn

Lol what do you think? He is a reviewer, Asus sent it out to him for him to review.

thats too microscopic of a comparison tbh. a 2022 oled vs 2024 oled from LGs C class. the differences will be of course in brightness, image processing and you get 144hz with the C4 but i think as far as gaming goes the differences are not very palpable to make you go "uh i need to upgrade the C2 to C4".

@@th3orist Those minor improvements can add up to something significant pretty quickly.

@@giantpizzasunset2534 maybe if you add all minor improvements over four or five years but not from one year to the next. My pov

@@th3orist That's what i thought but I saw comparisons between the A90j and the C3. Surprisingly the LG, in many ways, surpassed sony's flagship model from two years ago. According to reviewers the C1 was nowhere near the A90j.

Remove the stand, turn off all monitor leds, put on vesa monitor arm and you have pro-er look than LG

I'm in a similar boat. I just pre-ordered the LG....but idk if I would prefer a QD-OLED option like this monitor... I currently have a glossy 27" WOLED, and so I don't know how a matte finished WOLED would look, nor do I know how a semi-glossy QD-OLED would look... I can still cancel my LG pre-order and purchase something else....but there are no possible ways to see either monitors in person where I'm located in the US...

@NippleSauce no I have the ASUS PG32UQX with like 1700 nits of brightness using mini leds...it's like a $3,000 monitor. Tech Chap did a review in it like 2years ago. I want to know if it is worth it or not going to this new PG32UCDM

@@Coldgauge2k10 Your monitor is easy on the eyes and has an excellent picture. Yes, it does not have a 240Hz frequency. Whether you need this is up to you to decide.

Why the hell did you buy a 1080P (2K) monitor?

@@Battleneter back then, it was my so call "4k entry level" cause i can't afford real one yet.

42С3 is glossy

MSI doesn’t support firmware and isn’t calibrated as well as the this one. I personally have the UCDM and the hype is true. Incredible monitor. The gigabyte is interesting but who cares about DP 2.1 at the moment. No GPU can support it and even when they begin to we are going to be using DSC anyway. Not a big deal

It all depends what you want from monitor. I don't see a need for DP2.1 and I need something extra such as dolby support or ability to turn off all leds including power indicator. Panel is the same so its only matter of which extras you prefer.

@@904_nole2I have the mpg 321urx and it supports firmware update which I already did. Also I can assure you that my monitor is very well calibrated and the image is mind blowing. Absolutely perfect in my opinion. I wanted Asus I don t deny it but after I saw what msi is capable of I am very happy with the purchase!

Alienware is great Dolby out the box and brighter

@@NexGenTek no one cares about Dolby Vision, plus it’s curved. Which just looks awkward on a 32 inch IMO

Yes if you're not using ray tracing or path tracing, you'll have enough grunt for most titles at 4K 100+fps If you're ok with a larger display I'd recommend a 55" Samsung S90C over this, otherwise this is your best option (get the cheapest 4K OLED 240hz you can buy imo)

Not really! It’ll be great just don’t expect to take full capability

LG: fucked up EOTF in HDR, lower brightness, lower color gamut, no burn in warranty, no usb-c at $400 more (compared to msi qd oled)

The UQX smokes it but the haloing on the UQX is rough. I had both. I would probably pick the OLED just because the haloing.

​@@LexLutha Yes that's what I thought. I have the UQX and it is unsurpassed in 99% of any content but the haloing in scenes with multiple small bright spots against a dark background as well as the reverse haloing in gray/foggy scenes means that immersion can be broken and the cheapest OLED could laugh in its face in certain specific scenarios. Still I am hesitant to go for the UCDM because I use my monitor (a lot) for office work as well as gaming plus I have an LG C1 as a second monitor which is absolutely fine as an OLED monitor if I want to play a game that would suffer from haloing on the UQX. I am still not convinced that the UCDM would be a good all-in-one option despite the 3 year burn-in warranty. The UQX is really sturdy and I am completely care-free displaying static content on it for hours on end, I would probably be paranoid with the UCDM. I have been using the UQX for thousands of hours of work and play and there is zero degradation in the picture, zero dead pixels, no lighbleed and excellent uniformity in a way that it makes it hard not to forgive the 1% failure in some very specific scenarios.

1) It doesn't matter its the same panel, you must answer if extras is worth 100-200 USD more to you. 2) Its OLED, you must understand how it works and it will burn in sooner or later but you have 3 years burn in warranty (both asus or msi) 3) No point, its pretty much the same panel.

you can turn off all lights in menu (including power on led on chin)

I have the 27" PG27AQDM and that is my only nitpick with a otherwise perfect to me monitor.

I don't get that no one is mentioning this. You have an almost bezel less monitor, but ugly cables sticking out. Call me nuts but that is a reason for me not to buy this monitor.

for HDR yes TVs will blow away the monitors, for SDR its a wash, but the guy was probably using a matte oled monitor which made him think it was trash vs TVs which makes sense as matte screens sap the life out of the picture.

Having tested both, I would take the ROG. But for me it's down to the better brightness, punchier non-matte coating colours and that USB-C with PD. If you're in a bright room though (or like 480Hz mode) LG probably wins

@@Thetechchap ok i have looked into it and it seems to be the best option.

Plenty of competition though, so I reckon we'll see deals soon. The MSI and Alienware alternatives are around 1K (I'd go with the MSI)

I have MSI but I would never buy LG. It has no real benefits for $300-500 more! You can get cheaper qd oled monitor with better colors and rest of the money spend on better speakers (if you need those, instead of built in ones in monitor) and also you have 3 year burn in warranty.

Msi is very much the same, I have the mpg 321urx and is gorgeous!!!

I also have the MSI , it's 450 bucks cheaper here in Canada , and 140 bucks steam credit !

Cope

The Alienware aw3225QF has the same panel from Samsung and in put lag by this 120hz 6.3ms and 60hz 13.5ms it has more input lag with lower hz. I have yet the pg248qp 7.7ms 120hz and 60hz 8.8hz. We must waiting for the review of Ratings there the best an the asus 27 oled have 60hz 8.8ms 120hz 4.4ms but there’s lg display and 2.0 hdmi only. Hope I can helph you

I would like to know what it's like at 30hz for old games on the consoles.

@Katzikindi Thanks, man. I have the LG C1, supposedly it is 10ms 60hz 4k. Can't believe my TV has lower input lag than the Asus PG32UCDM.

@@Enrique_PC I mean we can’t say it to 100% we must waiting for the ratings review but they haven’t the monitor yet.

The best monitor is 4.4 ms 60hz the pg258q but 1080p tn an old monster the monitor was great but no hdmi 2.0 to the time .

There are colour temp and picture presets that give you a warmer look if you want (same on the Asus)

In EU also NA

Me to in canada is not available so sad

LG is matte. This is glossy. This is QD Oled the LG is W Oled.

@@904_nole2 What is the difference between glossy and matte ?

Probably review them at some point - I'm interested too.

@@Thetechchap Thanks, I'll be watching! Had a chat with Asus and confirmed that the cheaper M5606 has a slot to upgrade memory from 16gb to 32gb and the more expensive S5606 does not (odd). The cheaper S5606 has slightly more keyboard travel (odd again), slightly smaller bezels, and is slightly dimmer (500 nits vs 600 nits). And of course the chipsets are different, as is the port selection. Overall, though, they're very close.

stand is garbage thats why monitor arm for these big monitors is more preferred solution

I'd say so - know a guy in a similar position who's used one for years.

No.

You can. Only with a desk arm.

4K with 140ppi and upgraded sub pixel layout = text is tack sharp

Just hold on to your current monitor a little longer and you will have yourself an OLD monitor, far cheaper than buying one.

they are gray while you flash torch light at panel or sunlight while woleds have washed out colors no matter the condition kek.

Still waiting for my Book4 Ultra - when it comes I'll compare them in review.

because 1080p/480Hz is gimmick at best. Yeah its nice and "smoother" in motion but very blurry image and 240 Hz with instant reposne time of pixels with low input lag super clear and focused. Not to mention no burn in warranty, no usb-c, no dolby vision, no kvm, worse HDR performance with fucked up EOTF and washed out colors with matte screen that white looks grainy and overall image looks like it was smeared with "vaseline". Yes - you don't understand because you made no research.

Same boat here. I mainly play cs2 and sometimes other solo games. I play ln 4:3 or even 1080 at times

​@@MrM-dl5zm gimmick at best? the image isn't blurry unless you downscale to 24/27 inch. there IS dolby vision, there IS kvm and there IS usb c up to 90 watts, i'm guessing you had zero clue that LG weren't the only ones making a dual mode monitor as rog are aswell. with no official webpage for the PG32UCDP there isn't any way to tell if the warranty applies to burn in. once again with your lack of research the PG32UCDP doesn't have a matte coating and has much more vibrant colours than LG's monitor because of it. i really hope you dont say something stupid like "how would i know you weren't talking about the LG monitor" considering i'm comparing the PG32UCDP to the monitor in this video, made by the same company. maybe you should do your own research?

@@Hoyley It Is still blurry at 24 inch mode @ 1080p because internal would be 1660p at this size (which looks worse than 1080p@32") PG32UCDP is Asus variant with LG panel. But my stand is the same. Its gimmick feature - pros will use ELMB 500 Hz 24" inch monitors, this is oled to enjoy crystal image with perfect color accuracy and nice high lights from HDR. If you never had oled monitor before with high refresh rate, the 240 Hz is plenty ENOUGH. If you really need these 480 Hz then wait for 27 inch 1440p @ 480 Hz or you can get currently AW2725DF 1440p@360Hz

@@MrM-dl5zm i acknowledged it would be blurry at 24 inch mode, you are missing my point ENTIRELY, obviously that monitor is not catering towards pros it is catering towards people who enjoy story games AND competitive games.

LOL. Micro LED you say? How about you knock again in 10+ years then? Also be prepared to complain and have this easy to copy paste text when you see review of micro led monitor: "Why micro led is so expensive???!!!" When Micro led monitors will be available then there will be DP 4.1 or even better

Exactly. Its insane to even reconsider "speaker" as deal to pay $400 more for monitor while you can get amazing qd oled from MSI and for the rest you can buy top tier speakers/headphones any you wish for.