Iu

Wow, you wrote that 3 years ago.... before a tyrant said "I'm not leaving, you cheated" and summoned his minions in to End Democracy. "If I can't have it, NO ONE will!!! Bwahahaha!!" I'd almost forgotten how extraordinary it was BEFORE that happened, lol.

Hello from April 2022…

Look at now Putin is the best president in the world.Biden is good for America ,he is doing good job .

And if we have also done it, we must accept some consequences, especially if we do it again.

Baily Roe WHAT WE ARE HEARING IS ONE WAY STORY....

"Unedited views from those most involved"?! Really?! it was enough to listen 10 minutes to understand what all those other Russia "experts" and "friends of Russia" are going to talk. PBS FRONTLINE - and it's never cross your mind to hear the story from the other side?! May be President Putin himself?! Слабо?!

Marija Milenkovic, kind of like watching a series on the Klan. We know there’s a “both sides” to any story, but we know that part already.

Poor Putin, he is being railroaded like Al Capon was. "Tax Evasion? I been FRAMED!"

Really, where else can you go to get so many different people's viewpoints on one person? And such an important person to the destiny of so many in the world. As was his predecessor, whom he emulates, Stalin. He is so much like Mussolini that it would be interesting to study "il Duce" next. And, of course, the outstanding name in the history of Autocratic Despots, Hitler. Putin considers the US to be his adversary, at best, clearly no problem with having us as an enemy. A clear picture arises in this series from several viewpoints of a complex man: street-fighter, spy wanna-be, wily bureaucrat, corruption-rich autocrat, with a well-developed sense of paranoia. Putin lucked out big time when world oil prices rose sharply. Oops, then they fell again, so Putin is forced to try to work on the cheap. He would naturally rely on "asymmetric" warfare, most bang for the buck. Cyber warfare can run on just a few rubles. Offer all the criminal hackers payment, give them talking points, identify targets, etc. Obviously no need to teach them anything about the English Language, such as spelling, grammar, word-usage, etc. Not one of them has any idea why there are three ways to spell "their", "they're", and "there". Just pick whichever is easiest to type. So Russia has become the #1 world power in cyber warfare. US military (and even the National Guard*) have a certain strength in this area, with leading edge technology and well-trained cyber troops. And i expect that our expertise has grown in the last few years. But it appears Putin has already begun an undeclared cyber war on the US, so part of "infrastructure" is the scramble to harden our vital systems against cyber attack by foreign states. Even though Russia now has an economy equal to Portugal or Italy, Putin can force his will on other countries, even the US, with cyber warfare. And he can force his will militarily on any country except the US or China. Any country the world will LET him do, if he wants them, he can take them. Yeah, let's find out ALL WE EFFING CAN!! We need to look waaay DEEPER into his soul than Georgie did. THANKS FRONTLINE! * Check out the National Guard website for cool info about cyber defensive and offensive job categories and training. This looks like a super way for a person with computer skills to serve his/her country. Raise your hand if you want to learn how to hack Russia, or how to un-hack us from Russia.

@@TampaDave vlasputin is far more of a **bureaucrat** than a "streetfighter"❕

PBS is like our BBC. I know in America it’s not rated but I’ve seldom seen any shows/docs I was interested in by PBS that weren’t good. Seen some great PBS docs on arts/music/sports history too. You guys should keep PBS, there’s already enough commercial channels doing their thing. PBS have always seemed tame and fairly balanced to me.

Matthew D did you see that crazy interview with Roy Moore when he was asked about Russia? He complimented Putin and then said almost exactly the same answer Trump did equivocating on Russia and America. It was stunning. And then when asked what he would say to putin, he responded in perfect Russian. It was nuts. And I'm like you - that Trump interview convinced me something was up.

Among the reasons I say Twitler was not a "real" president... no Real President of the United States would ever, EVER! Say he trusts the leader of a country who believes we are his enemy, better than our U.S. intelligence services. He was an officeholder, but not a real president. You say "America First" but you act out "Putin First", you aren't a real president.

@@TampaDave in this interview they explained they had a very long period of time of interaction with Putin and Medvedev and yet despite that--the negotiations and the contact, the understanding and the open dialogue--the administrations *and the individuals* managed to convince Putin that we are his enemy, or at the very least, completely failed to convince him otherwise. How does that happen? Perhaps for the same reason why the American people are finally taking a critical view of Hillary as they receive truthful information ("real news", "real reporting", "real investigation") about the actions carried out by people explicitly like Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton, according to this interview, decided she wanted to "make Russia more Democratic". She was Secretary of State, which is the primary agent of foreign affairs. Why do you think that Putin might take various protests popping up immediately following his elevation of the Russian people, in combination with the Arab Spring, as being connected to US Intelligence operations? If the US government is committed to performing regime change based on a "we want to make everybody Democratic" position despite Putin having a strong sense of direction and sense of sovereignty, where does that leave diplomacy? The US policy, as best i can tell, has been very, very, very involved in performing regime change. Now think if the intelligence services thought that an American Citizen running for President or, once President, started directing foreign policy in a way that they didn't like and started to think that their agencies were threatened based on that very long history of foreign meddling and military engagement? You might think, "if they're that committed to maintaining a particular status quo and operations system, why *wouldn't* they try to alter the outcome of an election or otherwise implement a regime change?" Did you hear that the CIA has, in fact, been spying on American citizens domestically? It happened to coincide with Obama permitting the NSA to share data with the CIA (who is not permitted to perform surveillence on US citizens domestically). The FBI has been found to routinely break their version of those rules (which is exactly what happened when they performed an illegal spying operation on President Trump). That illegal spying apparently coincided with a DNC spying op, which coincided with a separate DNC misinformation op, that led to two separate impeachments of a US President, while attempting to link Trump to Ukraine *AND* to Russia (neither operation was successful officially, but convinced a whole lot of Americans that Trump was a Russian asset, despite it being ridiculous--leading to a 2020 win by the Democrats--and some people, like myself, to vote for Hillary in 2016). Oh right, and it was at the same time that the FBI lawyers avoided investigating Clinton, while leaking suggestive news about Trump. It is presumably also what happened when the FBI contacted a school board to have them request that the FBI investigate on behalf of the school board so they could begin to perform more widespread surveillance--you know, to stop parents from being upset about forced racist indoctrination. So yeah. Terrible to intellectually acknowledge a sovereign nation's position. Wouldn't want to...give them legitimacy, would you? That would be like admitting the US President won a free and fair election, and was in fact legitimate. Glad we had Clinton there to remind us in 2019 that Trump definitely was not legitimate. That would have just be stupid to validate the will of the American people. Practically un-American. Better to just impeach based on literally nothing. It sends the right message.

Trump was the best president we’ve had in almost a century. You three are delusional.

Seriously wrong you mean. 😂

@@caesarforlife1663 no and it's not remotely funny to deceive people by saying so 🙄

But Caesar is correct

So did he. He wrote several books/articles saying so. He took Russia's threat very seriously. However, he was a political adviser, with ZERO electoral votes. He can advise the president, but the decision is the president's. Putting off this war was the best of the awful decisions available. Many people got a chance to flee in the years after the downing of MH17, the moment I think Ukrainians knew they were in big trouble.

Kara-Murza too. These two are the best in the series, imho.

Glad you caught that. It didn't seem right when he said it.

Perfect!

Gadaffi had made too many enemies during his lifetime. His time was running out. *There wasn't a terrorist or a fifth columnist that he didn't like and fund. *He double crossed the Saudis and the Moroccans *He murdered a famous Syrian/Lebanese poet. (Assad gave Gadaffi's cell phone # to French military -- And he laughed when Gadaffi was killed.) *He got involved in French politics (and it is rumored that he funded Sarkozy) *He funded the Nation of Islam cult (in the USA).

Is anybody suggesting that "the Russians interfered with" the **electoral college** vote???

If Hillary and her staff had not ignored Wisconsin she would have probably won that state. (Milwaukee -- White, working- class Democrats did not like being called "deplorables" and being ignored. Usually Milwaukee and Madison are solidly Democrat. The last Republican to win in Wisconsin was Ronald Reagan --1984) *Popular vote* Trump: 1,405,284 Clinton: 1,382,536 *Percentage* Trump: 47.22% Clinton 46.45% *Ten (10) electoral votes* (winner takes all)

City of SEVASTOPOL, the Russian Navy base for 300 year NEVER been ukranian. Even in the times of Soviet Union it had a status of a federal city.

We’ll actually, Crimea was mostly Muslim Tatars until Stalin killed 200,000 of them in 2 days. Then later when Ukraine became independent they invited the Tatars that were still left to live back on their own land again. So it’s been a combination of Tatar, Ukrainian and Russian. That *does not* make it “Russian.” Russia invading lands and making them colonies doesn’t make those lands Russian, any more than Native Americans are “British”.

You are wrong. This guy is a loser and has a brain of a loser. There is no point to hate the loser, he doesn't have any credibility because of this. Period.

You are wrong: this guy is a loser - by American and by Russian (for sure) standards. There is no point to hate the loser.

Even the trolls won't admit they love him, they change the subject, lol.

@@cska2001 You are the worst troll ever; you’re not demoralising or destabilising, you’re just unintentionally funny.

@@markofsaltburn тьфу на вас! тьфу на вас ещё раз! Ржунемогу!

Yep. At least McF didn't have "friends in the Kremlin" like DT had.

All ambassadors have "friends in the White House" and they usually are people who have done a lot of work for- or given a lot of money to- the president for his/her election campaign. Examples: *Joseph Patrick Kennedy Sr.* (President Kennedy's dad) United Kingdom (1938-1940) *Shirley Temple Black* (Former child actress) Czechoslovakia (1989-1992) *Caroline Kennedy* (Pres. Kennedy's daughter) Japan (2013-2017) Nominated ambassador to Australia as of 2021 (Pending US Senate confirmation) *Cindy McCain* (Wife of the late Sen. McCain) @ U.N. Agencies for Food and Agriculture (as of 2021)

@@jaixzz actually he has many friends in the Kremlin. Where do you get your facts? From the hyaenas at the zoo? Or tea leaves?

There was no Trump-Russia collusion.

Bye bye

Watch more of this series. There were a bunch of reasons, and some are discussed in THiS episode. Around 32:00 I believe, is one example.

He was better looking and taller. That’s all it takes.

Reset = set again

Hi Kunny, how’s things? Haven’t seen you since you failed at trolling the David Hoffman video.

It's called Putin's Revenge

Three years later and nobody called you out on your green texting?

And the award for the least pet shop boys- like comment of the year goes to….

David Holt its funny hearing accusations of parsnips from conspiracy loving tinfoil hat wearing idiots - the main Trump / Putin support block - but hey, nobody said you aren't a bunch of shameless, projecting hypocrites! (Of course, everyone says that.. you're totally known for it. Your movement wad built and sustained by wild hypocrisy and demented paranoia, but you know that. )

PS. If you want to talk shit to someone, maybe you should reply to them so they get a notice oft your response. Deliberately putting this "response" on a different thread is pathetic. Coward.

"Americans are so gullible that they will swallow any conspiracy theory that comes along" No shit, they;re called trump supporter!

Paid Russian Troll

even if we did, that doesn't mean we fomented any of the rebellions against Putin. "Your honor, we don't have any evidence that the accused actually ran this stop sign, but we know he did because he has run stop signs before." "Case dismissed."

Timestamp?

What “big lie”

No they won’t. Stop projecting. Ukraine will win this war and drive back Russia. And Russia will pay for the reconstruction of Ukraine.

well? lol

@@Aan_allein I'm delighted that hasn't happened, obviously.

Casper , who blocked you on Twttle ?

Alexander D. Dunetz I guess "Caspar" isn't on the payroll anymore.

jesus fuck what are they trying to do lol? I've never seen them dump raw interviews before lol....

Not "Thanks, Frontline! This is like getting a college-level course in modern history for FREE!' OMG, my SUB FEED????

@@TampaDave yes for free because this propaganda is not worth a cent.

High bar!

No.

Wrong.

Because the americans cannot handle the truth and the facts! They are unable to look in the mirror and shamefully admit - We did horrible things! They like to hear only what they like to hear - and facts that don't feed into their way of thinking - they immediately start denying and putting labels.

Cballin well....they sure showed up. Basically 99% of the BS on here is pro-trump/Putin sludge

Still waiting? But the caravan goes on while...

😂😂😂🇦🇺

How is babby formed??

You think not - at least we agree on something 😀

I love how you spelled narcissistic right but could quite pull off “is” 😀😀😀

Schmaybe a red herring

With Trump, he would be welcomed to take Ukraine. Thank God Biden show real strength and stands up to tyrrany.

You’re so childish.

So tell me details about this base you are implying we set up in Crimea?

@@TampaDave Holy piss, first research the geographic significance of Crimea, then look at water, then research false flags, the research the reason the US is involved, research why Russia is pissed off - the real reason, not the on CNN or MSNBC provides and then research the geographic locations of US military bases worldwide and the ones close to Russia. The US maintains nearly 800 military bases in more than 70 countries and territories abroad. Britain, France and *Russia*, by contrast, have about 30 foreign bases combined. After you do all that, then maybe you can tell me why I'm right, rather me telling you in a likely 5 page education of US demonizing countries without a central bank and countries that don't allow US military bases stationed within their boarders and that don't have significant trade deals with the US. Only then will you see, the significance of Crimea.

Which bit, though? Go on, tell us darling, stop being a tease.

I don't suppose the last few days have shaken your confidence on all this?

I understand his winkle is the size of Cheeto, however.

Yuck heck no

You are just another liar and obfuscator. Obviously a tRumpanzee

Yep, C Hobson described his comment perfectly: "fake news from fake guy". In psychological circles, this is known as "projection."

With the exception of the documented 30 thousand lies. What did he say that was accurate?