nice Mrmobile....

It will come with the merger of Sprint it will acciure all of sprints mid band which will give speeds around 200 to 250 Mbps can't wait😁

@@mikechilders5898 Yep, mentioned in the video (wish I'd been able to see that cake that Myriam Joire took a photo of!)

Let's be honest, The MrMobile Channel seems to hold the best 5G Coverage on UKposts to date. Keep it up Michael, really appreciate this honest, unbiased and independent content.

@@TheMrMobile I was born and raised on Maui I live on the big island now

Ha! Thanks man, though I'm sorry to hear it! Did you have a 5G UWB device, even? David and I had to borrow ours from Qualcomm. Great seeing you out there.

Why not mention how dangerous 5G can be?

G Cart It’s not dangerous

@@brandon_nope 100 % it's dangerous.

​@@gcarter1973 Ok, let me just give you the full run-down because you just seem completely misinformed. First 5G, like 4G and every generation before it operates in the microwave band of the electromagnetic spectrum so at broadcasting power levels, the most dangerous it could be is in the form of heat. Second, mmWave does not penetrate solid objects so now the worst it could be is on the surface level of the skin (The sun's infrared rays don't cause cancer yet they're at a frequency of 300 Ghz - 200 Thz ). Third, if you're talking about the 600 Mhz spectrum, this was already used for century's with UHF TV so the exposure wouldn't be any realistic difference compared to now. Fourth, microwaves aren't even efficient at creating heat, this is why a 1800 watt microwave only puts out 1000 watts of microwave energy. And lastly, the studies that show damage by microwaves included: A, Incredibly long exposure time to the site. B, Situations where you'd be standing still directly next to a tower. C, the mmWave sites run at a MUCH lower power level since they're closer together. Although, none of this directly relates to cancer in any way. The worst situations that have occurred is in a school where a 4G tower was placed directly overhead which is just a completely wrong move. This situation lead to heating the brain directly, which led to tumors (Non-cancerous tumors caused by heat and not DNA damage, however naturally tumors can mutate and become cancerous on their own.) And this can only happen with lower frequencies that have actual penetration like the 2.4Ghz-3.4Ghz bands. mmWave is not able to penetrate the skull. But that's it, it's just heat and it works the same way any other band does like the Sun, quartz heaters, and many other types of heat that is radiated, only possible difference is that infrared has to short of a wavelength to penetrate the skull, which the longer waves of infrared are actually completely capable of, and our bodies radiate this type of heat 24/7 naturally. So all in all, yes under absolutely ridiculous circumstances it's "Possible" for microwaves to be dangerous but don't forget that your microwave oven operates at a far higher power level and that isn't even capable of genetic damage at the frequency of 2.45 Ghz. Hopefully, this clears up anything you were misinformed on, have a good one.

I’ve heard that the US is the only country using millimeter wave 5G due to the military constraints.

@@bd8594 that's interesting. Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read up

This is the same as ATT’s 5gE aka a lie

@@ShadmanAhmed1 it's not though. It's a lower frequency 5G

@@ShadmanAhmed1 It's tempting to think so, but I disagree. I take my cues from Sascha Segan at PCMag when it comes to this stuff, since he's one of the best resources for wireless network knowledge I know. His take: "In my view, 5G is a technology that can enable experiences, but it doesn't always do so. It's a radio system called 5G NR, which supports very wide channels and has a rich roadmap for future improvement. By that measure, T-Mobile's low-band 5G is definitely 5G and AT&T's 5GE is not." www.pcmag.com/news/372378/testing-t-mobiles-low-band-5g-lets-call-it-4-9g

even better to not spend money on technology that either won't work or won't be any better than what you already have.

@@BronzeLincolns81 KINDA LIKE HAVING A USED CAR WITH FULL FUEL TANK COMPARED TO BRAND NEW LUXURY EXOTIC CAR WITH NO FUEL LOL

Nah, they'll just boost that signal till our innards boil. 🤣

Yeah that’s why it makes sense for Verizon to go fast with no connection because they already have the fastest 4g that’s faster than T-Mobile’s 5g

joseph bodden funny analogy 👏 😆

Me too. Here in Vegas, TMobile is way better than Verizon. And I get Verizon Free from my work.

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/nqqEqqCmaYVpjoE.html

T-mobile uses low frequency 5g for greater distance. Mm wave has HORRIBLE distance but amazing speed if your next to a tower.

This needs to go for most corporations in a lot of areas. Figure out what need is being fulfilled and focus on that. We're out here with copy cat phones, cars, food, ect. Substance always wins

Insufficient mobility

@@TheMrMobile It's just 18 kg, that's still mobile! It has wheels if you want!

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/nqqEqqCmaYVpjoE.html

A big point Qualcomm kept making at the Snapdragon Summit was that 4G will continue to be an integral part of 5G for the next many years. So yeah!

since OFDMA is just being improved and still used in 5g, not a suprise

Currently, most 5G rollouts are using NSA, meaning nonstandalone so 4G is still used for singaling even when phone is connected to 5G for data. Anyway, there aren't nearly any 5G phone you can buy beside few flaghips, like 1 or 2 high mid priced phones from Chinese companies?

@@wiziek hopefully with the new chips from Qualcomm next year's phones should be 5g ready

@@Roshanrshenoy1 This more about price, bringing CPU and modems with affordable devices.

Yeah definetly, this shit isn't innovation, it's fascism.

Uh bc if your connection is faster, then you need the connection for less time. Its about freeing up bandwidth and reducing congestion

There's a million reasons to need higher speed.. are you being sarcastic?

​@@ILoveGrilledCheese no im not, no one needs 5g to browse facebook and upload to instagram. 5g is good for getting broadband to people who can't get it another way, but for strictly mobile use, its a waste unless they can get it to have better range and no line of sight issues.

@@tmr8193 1000gb? I think you mean 1000 mbps. Also, it's not fiber optic. It's cable over coaxial. The one that is fiber optic that is offered by Xfinity is the 2000 mbps plan. (Gigabit Pro)

Verizon’s 4g network is already faster and has better coverage than T-Mobile’s 5g network so it actually makes sense for them to focus on getting the highest speeds.

Yes and plus, C-band will give Verizon best of both worlds (coverage and speed)

@uwu manko the low band is suppose to reach rural areas they can't currently reach... Maintaining 4g LTE speed will be awesome for those people

@uwu manko perhaps you're right, but this is still going to be a big deal no matter what they call it.

@uwu manko check your info, the merger is still on trial

@uwu manko t mobile has already gotten 2 states to stop their lawsuits

@uwu manko doubt it, there's no reason it shouldnt he approved. You need to open your eyes and take a closer look on who is the real bad guy here. All the states left suing are liberals and liberals want to prevent anything good from happening to America unless it benefits their wallet and back pocket That's the truth manko

The iPhone 4 was never marketed as a 4G device. You must be confused.

Maybe the 4s with hsdpa plus

@@AbeDillon whoops, was thinking in my 4S yet missed the S... I still miss that little device until now

@@amnottabs that makes more sense. I had an original iPhone and an iPhone 4 before switching to Android to save money. They were pretty great phones. I think people blow things like "antenna-gate" way out of proportion.

@uwu manko I mean technically it is 5G technology, so they aren't lying on that front. But the advertising I agree with you; they are really exaggerating a bit with their promises of much faster speeds.

6g research has started will take atleast a decade to launch. And proper 5g might be 5 years.

@@roninr8199 Oh what? Lol i didnt even realize they already started working on it. Thanks for the info!

@@EarAche123 I love to live in future 😃 I have read about quick charge tech way in 2011. I have also read a Stanford journal in 2012 where battery charge was stored in Aluminium plates which can hold charge much longer and charge in seconds.not sure what happened to that.

You can get a new phone free. Check your emails. I got redeemed mine yesterday. It's limited to 5 phones, but 3 of them are nice ones.

Thats bc Tmobile as a corporation sucks hahaha

No it won't. All those people will block the signal. You need line of sight.

In my case, since I live in a developing country. I can still keep my Galaxy S10E for a long time until 5G is fully implemented in 2027 or later

@@LightningSnake jaja xD

Nice 😂 😂 😂

'5G:The Final Countdown Reloaded'..... (Sooo much Mind blowing Info!!!)

Ikr

monge mrxcvi gcam fixes it, but it’s still good, but not above averga

That's Chinas style.

I thought it looked _okay_

monge mrxcvi iPhone Squad where you at 🔥🔥🔥🍏🍏

4g just means 4th gen wireless lte,wimax,hspe+ were all released in that 4th gen window.

Mark Shan I have an iPhone 6S with a cell tower right behind my house so I have full bars. I usually get about 50 Mbps. I’d probably get slightly better speeds with a newer phone.

@@SalivatingSteve Weird. Maybe it's because there are less people in Canada. I remember my sister getting around 100 with an iphone 4 when it first released

Which is ABSURD....a damn connection over trees, which supply the best oxygen.

I really hope you know the price YOU & EVERY HUMAN WILL PAY fot YOUR faster surfing. OMG!!!!!!

Haha that's exactly was I was thinking.

Thanks for the kind words, and for watching!

Watch this if you want the real 'big picture' about 5G ukposts.info/have/v-deo/b3t6k6aOiYSVknU.html

That's how cells phones worked when when I was kid with the Nokia bricks. It seems like we are going backwards lol

@@imcrazyforwar We are. It's like back in the mid 90s when laptops had IR blasters to share data but needed a perfectly lined up setup and still probably, wouldn't work

@@WalnutSpice holyshit I forgot about those

Amen.

Also Mkbhd

@@blondedip777 unscripted?

unless you live in a huge City probably won't get to take advantage of that 5g

Is it really that hard to get data connection in Australia??

@@ShibaScience Australia is really quite big and most of it is barely inhabited. It's only really worth the networks' time and money investing in the urban areas there (plus a healthy dose of taking their customers for a ride).

@@tams805 I mean, sure. But the US is pretty big too and they were able to cover the entire county in a short amount of time. Though you make a valid point that the environment for both is completely different, so I understand why it may be difficult to do that.

Theres lots of coverage in area where theres a good population (even 5g in main cities) but rural/country areas are not great at all. They’re working on it, but with a population less than 30million, in a country the size of the USA, service covering every part of Australia wouldn’t be financially sustainable. Wont be long and Elon Musk’s internet project will see everyone using voIP calls when its up n running.

Maybe because his name... mr mobile

Everyone talks about how 5G will enable many IOT devices. Do they expect us to spend an extra $10-20/month per device for dozens of those little devices (like an Apple Watch) that only send 100mb in a month??

Plz explain o wise one

Turkey supposedly has 4.5G but that's just a little boosted 4G 😂

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/nqqEqqCmaYVpjoE.html

War Head - True; which is why I'm not rushing into 5G. It's where 4G was when it was first deployed. (Both AT&T and Verizon are cannibalizing 3G to deploy 5G - which T-Mobile had already done. There is an article on Android Authority that explains this.)

Perhaps this is not about speed, perhaps this is about the internet of things, surveillance capitalism in the first stages then evolving with the rise of China as a major global power into a dystopic world ruled by a technocratic -communist elite.

@@jacaro2012 well that was always the stated goal 5g is expected to bring the iot but the complaint is more about the bliant push of the tech that solves nothing or is so beta is barely exist to do anything with especially when u factor in price of plans and/or devices going up for no real reason not even considering how bad current plans/coverage is in the states

I guess it all depends on location. My brother has Verizon and I have T-Mobile , my phone is faster than his phone about 70% of the time where live. One of my friends got the McLaren last month and it's almost twice as fast as my phone on average. I guess It just means T-Mobile has focused more on my area

Depends on area. I have sprint and at certain areas in town my LTE speeds have topped 100mbps. Blew my mind. Maxed out at 116 lol Wish I could get some of that at home. At home I'm lucky to get 1 mbps with sprint. Moving soon so shouldn't be too much of an issue longer

@onii-chan's manko no I hate sprint, I miss verizon wish I never left. Owe then money. Soon as I can afford to ok going back to them.

Brian Clemons - I switched to T-Mobile's network (I'm a Tracfone customer - which supports both carrier networks, and provides US $1.00 network switching that you can do yourself) because I was changing phones (from the Galaxy Nexus to the S7); said S7 was an ex-Verizon phone that was network-locked (which meant that taking it to Verizon was a non-starter). The S7's SoC was a generic SoC from Qualcomm (one of the first such) and only needed new firmware (ODIN to the rescue). Once I got the replacement SIM from doing the network-swap, that and a firmware download via ODIN and I was off to the races. I'm not new to T-Mobile's network, as Tracfone is not the only MVNO that uses, or has used, their network - remember Virgin Mobile (now part of Metro - T-Mobile's in-house prepaid arm)? I pounded Virgin Mobile rather viciously - mostly due to their phone choice; all the S7 swap did was make said pounding make even MORE sense - I went from swearing AT T-Mobile's network to swearing BY it (I recommend T-Mobile's network today - and especially if you are on an MVNO that can leverage it), and it has exactly squat to do with 5G. (Other MVNOs that do - or can - leverage T-Mobile's network include Wal-Mart Mobile and Consumer Cellular.)

Wait till they slow it down like 3g

It will eventually be real slow as the amount of data being transferred goes beyond the ability for 4G. It’s the same thing that happened with 3G when 4G being widely adopted.

There isnt any

Gaming with Rocket the 5G is microwaving you!

Don't upgrade to it

5G is cancer.

Gaming with Rocket really? I think you’re lying that’s not possible

Yep. There are no safe test results at all. No independent testing has been done. It's been launched where I live as a testbed & we're ill with radiation symptoms, as are our pets. There are court cases going on at the minute. I don't know why anyone would want this. People who are interested can checkout Barrie Trower's videos. Ex Royal Navy Weapons Expert. The Sasha Stone 5g movie is also informative.

Sheeple don't wanna hear this

@@redkeating5933 yep its getting weird in the world!

Steve Harvey's White Clone They are in the Matrix skipping and singing to their own demise.

JEDASE if only ppl would think like this but naw blind sheeps

You both are very ignorant and don't know anything about how electromagnetic spectrum works...

Dominic are you not aware 5G is WEAPONS GRADE TECH. Wake up bud. You think these companies are spending billions so you can download 1/4 second faster?! I feel sorry for you and your children if you do.

Dominick Brewer it’s not rocket science on how frequencies work were just stating the more demand of fast cell data will bring more consequences than good. That’s all

@@rwhite4728 Can you back up that statement please? Microwaves aren't even ionizing so how could it damage DNA. You should be more afraid of the sun because it produces every wavelength on the electromagnetic spectrum (granted anything that is UV gets through the atmosphere) and guess what!? You are surrounded by UV rays which is way worse on so many levels which IS a type of ionizing radiation! If you're so scared of photons why don't you just hide in some sort of lead box with your stupid looking tinfoil hat!? Oh wait! You emit photons too believe it or not and good luck getting all of that lead! Do your research pal.

This is why I didnt get a 5G phone. I'm good with 4G.

Search "eugenics"

Search "logical opinions" and you won't find any of what you just said

Andrew Montigue 5g has not been tested for human safety. Your snide comments won’t change the facts.

@@LifeSizeBox Have you never looked it up? There are many TRUSTED sources that have proven you wrong. I appreciate your concern nonetheless.

Zaim Afham Why would you get it for not having it?

Brandon Y I’m still using iPhone X and still works perfectly but I’m not again that replace phone every time the new one get released. So if I want to use for a long term maybe I should phone with more new feature rather than additional one camera.

And your proof?

@@izralsei7617 ukposts.info/have/v-deo/nqqEqqCmaYVpjoE.html

@@mariaevora2142 What he is saying is all conspiracy. I've spoke to two physicist and hopefully soon about to hear from a NASA physicist. Crowd control is nonsense and 5g waves are non ionizing which means that they cannot pierce through the human body or any other life forms. Dont brainwash yourself with the wrong material. Even scientists like him get proven wrong.

Richard Snook,i agree.Way too many health problems asccociated with 5G. No thanks,slow and steady wins the race every time.

Ok boomer