Insinuates that all strategy can be learnt in a few years.. typical western word salad that sounds nice to naive ears

@lilibordei721 If that's what you read from it, that sounds like a you problem.

@@lilibordei721 all your combat simulations, super tanks and stealth jets won't do you any good when you can't get any food, fuel and ammo to your troops 🤣🤣

Sparta wished it had Modern Tech even if it means wars are almost non-existent

The other one: Infantry wins battles; logistics wins wars. Attributed to General John Pershing.

Bro don’t make it to long this comment bad

With zero chill ... straight calling them, a "garbage army"...🤣🤣🤣

You spelled “vodka” wrong 🤣

Wahahaha

you mean "our vodka"?

And what should have happened about the Minsk agreement, it was being broken, 14000 Russian speaking people dead, 12000 of those civilians. With imminent knowledge of a large Ukrainian force heading to the Donbas. Was Putin to sit on his hands and let Russian speaking people get killed, or step in and sort it out. If this had happened to any major western country they would do as Putin has done, no expert has given any alternative to the action taken, bar letting the Russian speaking majority of the Donbas get slaughtered. As for disaster, it's 7 to 1 ratio in Russia's favour, with NATO chucking everything in, no artillery shells left and low missiles, with production scattered round globe unable to meet demand or unwilling.

​@@SuperMario231it's always "our vodka" and "our alcohol" but suddenly get a hangover and NO ONE wants to share that xD

Infographics has become the number one propagandists. They must have some help from CIA. Love it. Lazy question but check out their estimated profit per month. Last time I checked it was over a million?

Someones jealous

@@ghostdivision836 not so much jealousy as much as anger and contempt

Step 4: combine all 20 of the same video again but in different order or under a different name Step 5 ??? (Do it again?) Step 6 profit

@@ghostdivision836 he is right though. lol . Smart though, very smart.

There seems to be a lot of those lately... an the Non-Compiled videos appears to have gotten much longer. Because of this, I often no longer even bother with clicking on these videos, and when I do, I usually don't watch very long!

little percy know it all

Russia really doesn’t care about taking losses of lives both civilian and military. As long as they are moving forward. I’m really surprised with how inept the military planning is on Russia’s side. Ukraine is so small compared to Russia and should be no match but they have been outgunned and taken back at nearly every effort.

little percy know it all @@btrizzle2150

@@btrizzle2150 Russia has little or limited interest in moving forward, that stretches supply lines, they are in Russian speaking areas, areas that were always Russia, until recent history. The civilian population are on the Russian side, this helps in sighting and security. The focus is in on attrition, Ukraine with all its help from the west, exhausts it's self on Russian fortifications. Half a million Ukraine forces lost, with billions of dollars of equipment, trying to get areas that voted to be part of the Russian federation. Russian losses are not insignificant 35 thousand. Russia has also set a standard for low civilian deaths, much lower than western conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, over a million dead. saying that in Ukraine, often targets are often in harm's way with a conflict zone stretching over a thousand km, missile, drone and aircraft sorties across an area the size of Texas, there have been twenty thousand civilian deaths, which Israel has met in a tiny area in a month. Russia does destroy buildings, but that is not good war, most often only destroyed if civilians are out of harm's way. special forces, drones and missiles target combatants, not everyone, Like the Two tonne bombs used on flat blocks like in Gaza or Fallujah Iraq.

The Ukrainians must be MAD that Russia and pressure from the WEST forced them to give up their 300 Nuclear warheads in 2001!

Russia is losing.

They still are losing it just that Ukraine is running out of support

Partly correct.. there is a ‚critical mass‘ to reach to initiate the nuclear chain reaction It won’t degrade in such a fast rate as it would matter but it could lead to increased amounts of so called fallout which causes long lasting environmental damage

I assume the main failure points are in the electronics and the trigger mechanisms for the button gun as those parts are fragile, vulnerable to radiation damage, and almost impossible to fix without a full overhaul

I almost forgot that the fuel has an expiration date it can become more volatile or less dependent on formulation either way it must be replace regularly

Someone explained it very well and I will try to very poorly summarize. ICBM tech is at such a state in Russia (allegedly) that most, if not an overwhelming majority of the silos would get blown to pieces before they could be launched. Because apparently, the US is intimately aware of all the silos. The only potential outliers are the nuclear subs and even then it seems that it should be relatively easy to keep an eye on them. Does that mean there's nothing to fear? Not one bit. Should Russia go for the nuke button, the fallout from the former Russian Federation crater would be very dangerous for me, the guy who lives in Europe.

@@xanmontes8715 It's counterintuitive, but the ICBM exploding would actually be one of the safest outcomes. People joke about not dropping the nuke or hitting it with a hammer, but triggering a nuclear explosion is actually really difficult and can't be done with a simple explosion. When a Titan 2 missile blew up in its silo in 1980, the warhead got blown into a nearby field and they concluded that it was actually a good thing because it disconnected the warhead from anything that would have triggered a detonation.

USSR: approx 9 years & 18Billion Rubles USA: approx 20 years & 2.26TRILLION DOLLARS (accomplished zero, Taliban stronger than ever) US vs RU in UA = $130Billion + UK/FR/EU etc vs approx $75Billion (accomplishing steady loss/return of former RU land given to UA by USSR; weapon sale profits, German econimic destruction)

Putin: "And I took that as a challenge."

​@@RedPillDiariesyou're sad that Gonzalo got arrested, aren't you?

what is your point@@RedPillDiaries

@@RedPillDiaries i wonder how many russians died vs americans. Pretty interesting stat in pretty much every war weve fought in. Please, research, grow up.

This is ''truth'' for Western and US viewers who have no idea about life...

​@@sguerilla6142 lol Russians still believe it's not a war lolol. Russians will believe anything that the government lies about. Meanwhile your sons are dying for nothing. By the thousands.

Wahahahahahha

No expert has given an alternative to the special military operation, minsk agreement being broken, 14000 Russian speaking dead 12000 of those civilian, in the Russian speaking majority donbas with a large Ukraine force on its way. no major western nation would have acted differently being put in the same situation. a 7 to 1 ratio in Russias favour, a growing economy, improving living standards, this with every sanction and arms package to Ukraine Russia still prevails, if we want to see leaders fall look to the west.

​@@williamrutter3619Hunh, you'd have to be tapeing him 24/7 500 plus days. 😥😅😅

@@maryrodgers2053 ?

@@williamrutter3619 In reference to Russian Stats. Putin is the Dictator, ergo he had his Caesar complex a number of decades. Way before one Western arm even got near to Ukraine his unattainable dream of a Super Czar with the boarder lines of yesteryear. He was not forced to respond to a large number of munitions West afforded Ukraine. That was not an impetus to force Putin to invade Ukraine. He expected it to fall, put his Leader he chose, then next victim, Poland etc, etc...

@@maryrodgers2053 i think you have been watching too much main stream media. I would look elsewhere for dictators, ones who are responsible for millions of deaths, domestically and across the world, lowering the standards of living of there own population and where they do business. The elected Russian leadership have not done this, there population have improving standard of living and where they do business there allies, they also have improving standards living. Russians are living longer and better. They have affordable housing. free university education (train more scientists and engineers than the USA, with half the population) . well maintained or renewed infrastructure. a good national health service, at an affordable price 5.8% GDP. A modernised large military at an affordable price 4% GDP . The Russian leadership stays in power because of its record on its own people. In a recent twitter poll by a conservative MP, 65000 were asked which leader would they prefer out of Sunak Biden Troudeau Putin . 77% voted for Putin.

Precisely!

How's that going?

Wrong

In 2001 - 2003 my AIT was almost 2 years, and I was reserve. Basic training was 9 weeks, although I heard from others they had removed the week of drill & ceremony and replaced it with live fire ranges firing from moving vehicles, keeping it 9 weeks total. They just cut some of the fluff.

Stay away from the kool-aid

It demonstrates what separates 🇺🇲🇺🇦 from them. We believe in human dignity and respect. The Russians don't even treat their own troops with respect. We must win this war.

@@PapaBAMBI-yb9ehlmao stop the bs

@@lidiay1 what a clear lie… nice try Russian bot

@@lidiay1ok Tinfoil Sausage

​@@PapaBAMBI-yb9ehif you attack a country you will get war crimes as people who are defending who arent military personal dont know them will do it

Ikr? War and death is so funny. 😆

@@danparish1344 It isnt, but Russia made the choice to start their ill fated war and they are responsible for the death and destruction. They will be paying for what they have done by the end of this too.

Living rent free in Infographics head lol

i mean when you operate as poorly as the russians do, there's plenty to report on. Also, russia is a terrorist state.

You must be easily entertained

Fr

Fr

I don't know if you know this but there's a war going on, there isn't much more deserving of being covered.

Korea, maybe? Depends what you call a war, I guess. Actually, I don't really know if we won that one or just called it a draw.

Libya

Korea and Libya? Jeez. The last war they won was the War of Independence.

i mean, russia is in a far worse situation than before. they just lost 3 of their most expensive jets in 1 mission, they used to have 5 now they only have 2 with a missing crew

True, russia has lost over 315,000 troop losses and counting

​@@ohmybrowncowsource: the same people that claimed russia is losing 😅😅

@@eng3d RU’s official claim is 6K since feb22 😂😂😂 however Wagner reported 60k cas. Taking Bakhmut alone last year

Ha ha. Russia has been losing since February 2022. It will be losing until February 2032.

They have a crush on him

I think they made at least a million $ thanks to him

Lol😂

Putin making us fail our tests

@@nightcorereality7348 lol

Bro u like kamikazees

If you want the full extent of his mistakes, try stretching that out to about 10 years.

keep ignoring the illegal coup in 2014 by the Western mafia cartel.

Kiev regime lost donbas referendums before invading Russian territory

@@SteveInLava 👍👍 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

​@@u-1s2e3r4 Oh, you mean the referendums which were illegaly held (or better said - staged) by russians? Like those in Kherson and Zaporhizia where armed soldier were present in the "voting" rooms to "keep peace and order". The ones where more people voted 'yes' than the number of people who were actually living and present in those regions at the time 😅 Yep, totally legit thing, those "referendums".

You do realise Russia is absolutely demolishing the Ukraine army, right? Bloopers from the West maybe.

How can he watch it in his grave?

Oh hi

Any country that knows russia well hates it.

Between their submarine launched missiles and their land-based often mobile ICBM's that's a significant fraction, especially seeing as they have the most nuclear weapons of any country on the planet. Even if 10% are in working condition and deliverable that's still enough to destroy most countries, and to tank the global economy. 9/11 did that and only 3,000 died; what do you think the effect of millions dying would be and whole cities destroyed?

@@tomwithey711 If Russia only has 10% of their nuclear weapons operational and deliverable, which is still optimistic. Then the US anti missile system becomes much more effective. The reason people say that anti missile systems are ineffective is because if you can only stop 80% of 2000 weapons. Resulting in the allies still getting hit with 400 nuclear weapons. But if Russia only has 200 nuclear weapons operational than the anti missile defense becomes more effective and say 95%, then only 10 nuclear weapons get through. Still a terrible though but definitely survivable. It also gives the West incentive to strike first. If the West can take out Russian air and land launched nuclear weapons that is about 90% of their arsenal. This would only leave their SLBM which may or may not be vulnerable to US submarines. We have to assume not. Still if you drop the delivered nuclear weapons by another 90% you get to maybe none or only a couple get through. Russia has 3/5’s of its nuclear deterrent in land based missiles the most vulnerable. The US has over half in SLBM the least vulnerable.

i’m too dumb to really understand what y’all are saying but y’all seem pretty smart

only people that want to use nukes is USA

hypersonic missles are unstoppable idiot? they quite literally have no counter to them the rusians dont even have counters to them

@@viponly5372 okay, take the last year and tell me. Who has threatened with nukes the most?

Did you actually see the remnants of the missile that was shot down…? Come on dude, easiest way to verify or reject what the Ukrainian gov claims. They did not shoot down a hypersonic missile, lol.

@@Proton23757 tell me in history who has actually used nukes?

They do

@@1mol831 That's what I thought.

@@silversolitaire1519 but the rate is not really that high

@@1mol831 still, even as the weapons decay, that still makes them less effective. Not to mention that the weapons more delicate systems can be affected by the isotope’s decay, is what’s going through my head.

@@silversolitaire1519 it needs to reach critical mass to really decay fast, or else a couple decades is inconsequential, think thousands of years to really affect its performance

Some people just likes to win harder

That is why prisoners are not always taken r [

Why don't you find out ?:)))))

@@Traveler_SF wow good one, youre so humorous.

@@Traveler_SFwe already know

They are loosing.

Putin told us that they gonna take kyiv in 3 days. 500 days later? deffending and falling back during an invasion.

@@154fleetwoodYou failed 3rd grade English class but you’re an expert on geopolitics huh?

@@SGTMasterBean Perhaps because it doesn't take an expert in geopolitics to realize that much? Between retreat from the northern flanks, stagnation in the Russian invasion from the southern and eastern flanks, low morale and high rate of surrender and desertion from the Russian forces, Ukraine slowly regaining ground, Russian economy having a severe deficit, one coup and potential future coups abound, Parasite Putler threatening nukes like a sore loser throwing a temper tantrum because he can't have what he wants, etc. Although the process is slow, all the signs are pointing towards a Russian loss.

Ukraine is running out of ammo , they will be finished soon💀💀💀💀

It’s like a full length movie lol…

@@OLDMANTEA more than average lol

I watched a video last year, this fairly old Donbass militia man , he had gone to Iran bought his own mobile artillery his mate had an old 4x4 and a hobbyist drone and a smart phone. The old 4x4 scouted off ahead, used the drone to spot enemy position, the position was given to the chap with this very old mobile artillery, they fire, fire again, they hit there target. All done off there own back, the entire setup less than one western guided shell. I saw that and new war was now different for ever, militias especially with back up are extremely powerful and very cheap. West Mobile artillery cost millions, not thousands, shells cost thousands, not hundreds. Those militia men were fighting for there homes, they new the land, they want to speak Russian and for there Children to speak Russian. I feel bad that we interfere, backing people we once put on terror lists, but they are resourceful and will prevail. power in the world is changing, we in the west are the past, we can't bully anymore.

Some specific parts did, others did not

One of the best ERBH in my opinion. I shook hands with the Ronald’s both Regan and McDonald’s, if your name end with “in” it’s time to get out

🎵 Ra Ra Rasputin, lover of the Russian Queen 🎵

The quotes so autistic you gotta spam em multiple times on the same video eh?

Our power grid isn't reliant on Russia and while things have gotten more expensive it's not a deal breaker but does hurt the lower class. In Texas you can't afford to have your electricity off for more than a day, especially during the summer months.