🤣🤣👍

Today that is NOT too difficult!

Loooooooooolz

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

The T-14 has 6 Reverse Gear's, It can Destroy 10-20 Abrams Undetected and be Back in Moscow before The Joint Chief's even know it was there

Слава Україні!

No problemo ! 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🤝🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦

Hopefully, the world comes together again when it’s time to remove the Chinese communist party!

110% love and support to Ukraine from US!

slava ukraini!!! we love you guys and are proud of you standing up to the biggest Dictator in the world!!!

Still U.S don't have guts to fight war directly and not using proxies as Ukraine

Too soon man, too soon...

No, you are wrong currently there are about 73 su 57's in service and i believe that Russia is using very low numbers of su 57's in ukraine

21 were built, 11 for test and 10 in serial production

All the SU's are Notorious for engine problems, maintenance problems, and getting parts.....

The same way China said the T-14 didn't live up to the hype

Indian engineers noped out, maybe SU57 has a toilet, the scariest thing for Indians.

India is (fairly) proficient in building their own single engine light fighters, but designing, not so much, making it somewhat disputable whether it's even really "their own". Until merely a few years back India wasn't even halfway finished with designing of the Tejas, and for them to actually build it was nothing short of fantasy. There simply was no way they would ever achieve their goal of building a modern light fighter completely domestically and without any foreign components or outside help. Their Tejas project had already been going on for 40 years or so, and with still no finished and working design let alone a flyable prototype they realised their objective was impossible, and once they faced that reality they wisely decided to ask for Western help. They hired amongst others engineers from Dassault, and if I'm not mistaken Rolls Royce as well, and with their help they finally succeeded in finishing the design of the Tejas, and a while later their first working prototype. It's now coming off the production line as an affordable and pretty effective multi-role light jet, but thanks for a large part to Western Europe.

I wouldn't say India is proficient at building fighter jets. Maybe on a production line they can assemble them, yeah. But anyone can do that. India does not have modern capabilities of designing a fighter other than maybe cloning and/or modifying a 4th gen like an F-16

India noped out because they got involved with another fighter program, why bother with non-existent aircraft when you can get actual one's

I flew one from St. Petersburg to Helsinki on its third trip for Aeroflot, and its baggage holding ability was woefully inadequate. No overhead bins, no cargo area, no area just back of the cockpit. I held my luggage in my lap for the whole trip. Très inconfortable! I almost forgot - no free drinks in First Class. No First Class, for that matter.

Lol

are u Serious🎉😂

@@yepengsong OF COURSE! And do not even consider flying on one if you're taking pets.

Bruh! 🤣💀

If only it was as good as the Russians say. hehehe

Don’t bring a knife to a gunfight

@@BrianSmith-oc8vkespecially a missile fight😂😂💀

Thing is though they kind of said the same thing back in the 50's and 60's with the F4 Phantom not having cannon and then more maneuverable subsonic Mig 17s in Vietnam took many down.

@@cb3648 this may shock you, but we don't live in the 60s anymore. Modern missiles and sensors are a completely different beast than they were back then. Just because guns were once inferior to bows doesn't mean that they still are.

Most base the lack of manouverability on the flights of 2015 with the restricted flight envelope programming. The programming has since been updated drastically

No, I want my WW2-era dogfights still. Forget the missiles, use the cannons! And if those run out; then perhaps today IS a good day to die!

YOU are assuming the F35 can fly!!! They have crached and burnt many times recently?

@@HappySpanker2016 Klingon?

Especially when the 6 SU's aren't flying outside of Russian airspace lol

Canado should do the same, since our RCAF is upgrading to f-35 sometime this decade.

@@alyssinwilliams4570 bruh... we dont have anything to give I promise you. Canada armory is basically dry. Liberals rely on usa for protection i guess

Has my government actually confirmed the Hornets for Ukraine??? 1 August today - I hadn’t heard the Australian government had actually confirmed we were donating them! A LOT of Australians hammering our government to actually give them to Ukraine. I do hope we have. Slava Ukraine!

Going now nothing confirmed about giving much less actually sending to Ukraine

I hope so, Ukraine needed lots of advanced weapons a long time ago.

Everyone is a badass until the snow starts speaking Finnish.

Definitely a mistake.

​@@zaodedong9935The Ghost of Simo speaks from the snow😊😊

@@zaodedong9935 Long ago some guy named Stalin found that out!

Not Really, the irony is that the Finnish population is far greater danger now after joining NATO, than before, where they actually had good relations with Russia.

Long live Mother Russia! For Vorkuda!

@@phoenixzappa7366 russian bot.

​@@phoenixzappa7366Calm down Reznov

The Red Army's advance in to Germany is swift and brutal. In mere months, we have reached Seelow Heights - the last line of defense before the German capital. We outnumber the Germans ten to one! Wave upon wave of our infantry are unleashed upon them to clear the way for our armor. Once we have control of Seelow, we will begin the march to Berlin. There, we will ensure that every sacrifice is repaid in blood.

​@phoenixzappa7366 WTF does WW2 Have to do with anything??? Calm down Ivan and have another drink!!!

putin: I’m a scary cat 🐱 NATO: good cuz u gonna die u scary cat

Brilliant observation 😉

Careful not to count all us made planes as U.S. aircraft. I think there are only 400 or so us f35s in service with the us. Also only around 120 f22s are mission rated.

⁠@@Typexviiibare there any SU57’s that are mission rated? They only have a handful and aren’t using any on the battlefield.

​@@Typexviiib okay so, 21 vs 120. Still like those odds & that's not even getting into the fact that there are 12 SU-57s in existence, none of which are yet combat certified.

The F-22 is being retired

​@@subjectc7505The Americans are retiring them SLOWLY.....they will still be around for a minute since the F 35 problems have finally been fixed.....the older F 15S are going 1st.

No, they just accelerated right into the ground. All planned out! Get your facts straight! 😂

Don't speak the truth now, that's no good,

The F-15EX would likely beat even an F-35 in a straight fight, as it's not stealth and doesn't have to make any compromises to try to be so. It is fast, can hit hard, and, as you mention, it is incredibly maneuverable. The F-35 and F-22 rely on stealth to operate properly, while the F-15EX just brute-forces through threats in full view of observers.

I'm irrationally obsessed with the F-111 Aardvark so I'm bias: but I think the F-111 would be sufficient against a SU-57.

@@rand4239 that plane got easy shot down in Serbia long time ago as it wasn't stealth in real life.

@@idarpolden5913 it was F117 not F111

Because giving Ukraine nato support would lead to direct confrontation between Russia and the US both major nuclear powers

Who said NATO wants Ukraine to win this war? As far as I know they just see an opportunity to sell weapons and capture some of Russia's new "invincible" airplanes and tanks. Whether Ukraine wins or lose, it's win-win for NATO.

can you imagine how much Putin would complain about that? He cries every time he makes a statement.

You need to train the pilots and ground crew first, which I heard takes a year to fully train someone to be combat certified on the F-16. NATO is giving them Mig-29s which they're familiar with and it can be equipped with Western weapons. Idk why people think we can just pull some out of storage and send them off. did you not see what happened to the Leopards and Bradley's? That's easy prey for Russia, to just send everything with no proper training.

@@Zerg435 No one claimed Russian aircraft and tanks to be "invisible" every country has some of type of technology boom.

theres not much question whether russian jets like the su 30, su35 or su57 are maneuverable. the problem is, its not going to matter when they are shot down from 50 miles away, by an f22 or f35 that it may not even know is there. US stealth fighters will see a semi stealthy su57 well before it can gain a target grade lock on them. whether the amrams can keep a lock on the sukoi depends on how stealthy it really is, and how good its countermeasures are. not a lot of faith in anything they have said about it at this point, but there is enough footage of it flying to know that its very maneuverable haha

@@paradiddlesixix7530honestly. Every, and I mean EVERY, su-57 fanboy brags about its maneuverability. It can show off its little maneuvers all it wants, but that ain’t gonna matter when an AiM is approaching its position from 40 miles away.

​@@paradiddlesixix7530you speak the truth, but it cuts both ways, at current our AIM120s have much less range than the top of the line Chinese weapons of similar class. It's literally one of only two advantages they have,the other being a large ballistic missile force that's pretty up to date,well stocked and well trained. Not enough to win a war,but there air to air missiles for their jets just might be enough to allow them to achieve objectives due to no one being able to actually establish air superiority. 😕 were working on the AIM260s that put the ball back in our court,I don't think there done yet though. However with America you just never know, look at that stealth chopper they left behind after killing bin laden? They ALWAYS have high tech weapons hidden no one else has,and ALWAYS have doctrine and tactics/strategies to go along WITH those weapons. I think that's the true strength.

How much I love the F-35, the helmet need a lighter redesign asap. 😅

It's invisibility is its greatest defense.

You can't destroy something that doesn't exist 😂

@@jamesheinz6325 and nations like canada donating cash to ukraine so they can buy those weapons yup this has brought us all together not as putin wished apart...lol

And what did you tell him - that he was right? That's a tough fool, because you can only sell that story to such people.

Where do you pull that story out lol

@@anvutrong6870 so you are so convinced that Russia is in the right here that you can’t fathom the idea that some Russians who live outside the country think it’s just wrong to invade another country and on top of that, take well over a year to make small progress

​@@cosmicclam7305 No it's not what I'm convinced. You see, I am a Vietnamese, I know what it's feel like to be invaded by bigger fools. What I disagree with you, is that this war is not the embarrassment for the Russian but the West. Why? 1. The small budget of Russian being able to saturated all of the US and NATO resources. 2. The dollar is weaken, everyone know it. Russian been short on those for a decade. The Rubble and Yuan is getting stronger, that's where the fight really are. That's how the US lose the Vietnam War 3. Russian clearly stated they wouldn't do jacks to Ukraine as long as it wouldn't touch anything NATO. The West keep influent the internal of UKR to make it join NATO. That's where Russian draw the line. The Clown knows this but still pursuit for NATO. Why don't just stay neutral? For me the fools here is Mr. Volodymyr Oleksandrovych Zelensky. He's kinda the guy who play chess for fun with nuclear button on it. Also, the current version of Russias weapons is not incompetent and weak. As you can tell by yourself. I can elaborate on that too if you want.

1.Rússia is only fighting a tiny percentage of NATO weapons that Ukraine isn’t trained to use, and no Russia isn’t spending very little, they gave Wagner over 1Billion to take bahkmut alone which took them forever, not including the rest of the country or soldiers 2. The yuan is getting weaker and Russias gdp took a huge hit since the war began 3.ukraine joining nato wouldn’t be a threat to Russia if they stayed out of Europe and stopped invading counties (Ukraine, Georgia, crimea)

I mean, 3 of the things got splashed by one poorly maintained f14 and one super bug.

Don't listen to random people about anything on the fifth generation. No company who developed stealth aircraft will give you 100%. It's all random numbers, while the Su-57 is low observable, it's still good for what it's made for and TGM is full of plot armor and isn't accurate to real life.

​@@subjectc7505on the 5th generation lol funny guy

​@@subjectc7505its only good for show.

Spring nears? It's July... Therefore it's well into summer...

It hasn't played yet for you to watch it so you don't know.

They got the narrator and animation team in a sweatshop LOL

i don't know either

How? He's Put-in the effort...

Its a psyops organization. Lors of funding from government makes it easy to have a large team. Of course the funding goes through multiple NGOs or CIA fronts.

Moneeeey 🤑

Makes you wonder who ise xactlly behind producing these videos?CIA?Hmmmm i,e Radio Liberty is CIA and everyone knows they fund it,which im fine with

That is very true. I honestly do not think Putin had any idea the terrible shape his military was in when he launched the invasion of Ukraine. I think he truly believed that the Russian military was as strong as ever -- and it very well could've been if so much hadn't been siphoned away due to corruption. On top of that, Russian military training -- especially for new enlisted soldiers -- is more akin to lethal fraternity hazing rather than anything approaching military training. And senior enlisted and officers often steal the paychecks of newer soldiers which kept the morale of the bulk of the fighting soldiers in the toilet. If not for these and other factors, it is very likely Kiev would've fallen in a few weeks. And I don't think for a nanosecond that Putin would've stopped with Ukraine. Why would he? Whether he would've gone for Finland, though -- that's difficult to say. Personally I think he would've gone after the break-away nations from the old Soviet Union first. Some of those nations are currently out of reach like Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. But others, like Georgia, Moldova, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, etc., would be more likely targets I would think -- mainly because Russia would have a stronger claim on those nations than on Finland. In addition, if Russia brought its borders closer to NATO through invasion, he couldn't then very well complain about NATO getting closer to Russia.

Finland has been training with NATO forces for years, Putin just pushed them over the edge to make it official and thanks to both Sweden and Finland joining Putin has now lost being able to use the Baltic sea for his navy.

T-14 doesn’t even work lol. It’s broken and stuck in prototype limbo.

@@ChrisZukowski88 actually it has been fielded but it has also already been left empty to take back to Germany and exermine it

@@ChrisZukowski88 better than of NATO

The issue is there's only a couple of tank plants that can build them and the most significant blocker is that the t-14 requires advanced western chips to build however even if they could build them all plant capacities are currently being used to build older tanks or repair and refurbish tanks needed for Ukraine

HIMARS would quickly take em out I'm thinkin

@@solaceofsnow2140 yeah it definitely exists in few numbers.

"The" is true though.

More accurate than most of their statements

Oh really? What's the RCS of an Su-57?

@@easypimpin123RCS of an SU-57 is the same as an f/a-18 😂

@@domcamp3313 Ha! The f18 is a 4th generation fighter that's 44 years old and hasn't been produced in 23 years. Lol. The US air force is already developing ultra high tech 6th gen drone fighter jets. They're stealthy, highly maneuverable, remote operated and most importantly: it's dirt cheap! That means the Russians are 2-3 generations behind us.

General: So… we lost a SU-57. Putin: Excuse me? General: To a bumblebee. Putin: …

What's worse is that he has a chance to use them now, before the F16s get there....maybe

There is no need to use them in Ukraine. Neither side has air superiority due to air defenses on both sides. They would probably be used in a war against a country with an actual air force.

It also possible to pick up stealth aircraft, not by active radar, but by passive scanners. Stealth aircraft do a great job of absorbing/deflecting radiation, but sometimes they can do their job a little *too* well; such craft have the potential to be picked up as shadows against natural background radiation. I feel this is why passive radar, of various spectra, is a crucial (and often overlooked) method for militaries to utilize in stealth aircraft detection.

I agree with you completely when talking about 5th gen stealth aircraft. Reality is leaning towards the Felon being closer to a 4.5 gen fighter. Most sims give the SU57 F22 like stealth. The US was / is flying F22s over Syria. If SU57's were anywhere near as stealthy as Russia claims, they would be over Ukraine to claim air superiority.

​@@TheStigggggit looks to be similar to a eurofighter in terms of what is developed in terms of maneuverability so it is like 4.5 id say.

That sounds like something Lavrov could say.

Zero combat record= King of the sky. The true king is the F-15 piloted by Israeli pilots 💪🏽

@@subjectc7505 because nobody dares to challenge the US air dominance.

@@biglee13m "nO oNe DaReS" yet a Rafle and Mirage 2000 beat a F-22 during a exercise. Don't get cocky, something that expensive and dubbed "King of the sky" shows little of it. While the F-15 showed a lot and the iraqis challenged it, as well the Chinese. The "no one dares" myth is hilarious.

@@subjectc7505 The F-22 was beaten once after beating the european jet countless times before. Please do research rather than reading headlines

@@easonliu600 Nope, two European fighter jets beaten the F-22 once. Thank you next

I mean, to Russian radar that may still actually be stealth. They just make the false assumption that everybody is using as outdated systems as they are.

@@theprogressivecynic2407 According to US pilots they lost 2 stealth bombers and f-16 over Belgrade in 1999. They targeted few dozen stationary buildings in the city, and lost 3 aircraft to SA-3 system from 1960s, that was used in Vietnam war.

@@1GTX1 That was a F-117A, not a modern stealth fighter. Also, only one was destroyed, with another being damaged and mission-killed, but not destroyed. The nighthawk was taken out of service a couple years later because radar advances made it low-observability, but not stealth, and it was rendered obsolete by a new generation of stealth. What Russia is doing today is running the equivalent to a Nighthawk, and still thinking that it is stealth.

@@theprogressivecynic2407 Not to mention that taking down the F-117A was somewhat of a fluke. It wasn't repeatable which is why the US only lost one of them. Plus the F-117 was extremely high maintainence and needed special tiles that could not be damaged in any way at all - then it had to be re-painted after every mission with expensive radar-absorbing paint. It was tedious work for the ground crew and created long turn-around times. The F-117 was basically an operational test bed for stealth technology. And it did work.

When you fail that spectacularly in whatever it is you're doing, it's time to "Put in" your retirement papers.

Paper bear, yeah, but paper dragon, I don't know man, even the U.S. Military said they were impressed with their air forces capabilities. That's going to happen when they steal our stuff, and they have a decent manufacturing infrastructure. I don't think they'll be able to maintain their defense spending with their demographics though, but I do believe they are a danger to their neighbors and our allies in Asia.

​@@jonathanmstevens the chinese economy though is still projected to grow for the foreseeable future. Also their current defense spending is lower than the us defense spending by percentage of gdp. If the Chinese economy continues to take off they will not need to adjust their spending level yet the sheer amount will exceed the US is the coming decades. Plus china will not allow taiwan to declare independence whether the us likes or or not. It's a fools errand to fight a war you cannot win.

But it wasn’t easy! Until F4 wasn’t built with a gun only missiles. When this problem was corrected the numbers started to change back to “normal” sort of speak. Dogfighting is still a thing, let see how it goes with the 5 generation planes

Lol, im with you, but the language forbids countries with disputed territory from joining

When you are defending you piece of dirt using guns and other weapons, they are at war. Had Ukraine allowed Russia to come in and take everything then they have no Country...as Russia ain't joining NATO and there goes democracy.

Youre right, its obvious he doesnt know enough about whats actually going on to be afraid.

@@Typexviiib I'll have to agree too. I remember him doing all sorts of military-historical videos before the war in Ukraine. Now, it's almost only about it. Its easy money from yt. Put the usual clickbait, "end of days for Russia" kinda title, spend some time talking about nonsense and your bank account is set. Dozens of them channels around. Making money from an audience that listens to it wants to listen to, not what really is all about. Demand and offer...

@@Yiannis2112 i meant putin doesnt know enough to be afraid. Lol. But ya, this channels sells what people are buying. Not sure why people feel the need to point that out. Imagine going up to a baker and saying “youre only putting these rolls out here because you know im interested and you want to make money”. Ya, its a business, thats how businesses work.

@@Typexviiib Vlad knows very well what he's doing. A gazillion times better than anyone in here. As for the business part, yes, its exactly that. With regards to it, what I was pointing out is the poor level of knowledge of the audience that creates the said demand.

@@Yiannis2112 my mistake, i didnt realize youre one of those “its all going according to plan” vatniks. Carry on.

Wow, absolutely amazing!

Japan ATD-X never service.. Japan want 6th generation aircraft called “ F-3” course mode on 2024..

Nah bro x-02 bro

Same I love the su57 tgm its the only plane I use, its the most beautiful jet ever made imo

You haven't even watched it, how do you know if it's nice?

Yeah china is a fourth world country.

J-20's won't solve the air control issue Russia is having. J-20's radar and engine limitations don't allow the fighter to operate outside of friendly radar support and too far from friendly places to land. Odds are Russian equipment couldn't support the J20 meaning China would need to send a lot more than just fighters like AWACs and comms. Russia can't afford it