❤️

Congrats ❤️

Congratulations

darn sure you deserve it young man

gg

253 likes and no comments?! Me:FINE I WILL DO IT MYSELF

Hell yeah

"Hey vsauce michael here"

We all have ionic jets now.

Lol

Yey

Hey plasma channel , I'm Ur fan

Plasma channel, I love seeing your comment! I just recently received a coffee mug of yours in the mail that I ordered. The black mug with the key and energy in purple. It's fantastic! Such a cool image 👍🏻

OMG. I can't believe you commented on this channel. Both of my favorite channels talking.

Hopefully someday a person with the vast knowledge you two have will build a controller and run a hyperdrive system like Gerard Morin was trying to build, if the electric companies can use their skin effect energy to pull the ionic energy out of the atmosphere to feed our transformers, building a frequency controller to run the edrum motors should be no problem.

Yeah here on Earth

@@melissaflood505 *cough* oxidizer *cough*

@@poggergen1937 lmao!

What more crazy is. We got now the technology to have unlimited energy the man replicate the power of the sun light and converted into electricity.

why is that crazy?

@@ooneybird27I suggest you watch “keys to the truth” “how top gun fighter jets fly”

Yes, that sounds correct. Question is what is the MPG equivelent of Xenon they are carrying. Several orders of magnitude higher than molecular combusion IIRC.

Mass that can be thrown away ? Thats a tiny bit flippant sorry. That tiny bit must be taken with and also gives a finite travel distance. Both the main reasons ion is touted as better this test just shows it fails on.

Ah shit

@@jemlittle1787 Mass that can be thrown away is the way all space travel works. You move by throwing away the uninteresting bit (the fuel) to move the interesting bit (the spacecraft) somewhere else. Conservation of momentum requires this. Thankfully, there is no Conservation of Interesting Bits. In fact, the center of mass for the spacecraft and fuel remains stationary, at least barring outside interference, and the fuel just ends up over here somewhere, and the spacecraft ends up over there somewhere. The question is exactly how efficiently can you convert into movement the throwing away of the uninteresting bit. Conventional rockets are not very efficient, ion thrusters are very efficient.

Xenon provides the mass associated with its density( heavier than other nobel gases / elements) also bioavailability of Xenon requires no catalyst; be used as a zero point energy source

+He's so wholesome

Don't give him pressure. He is working hard. Even he can burnout 😅. But yes, the guy is never out of content 😂. Im always asking what he brings next. And he is always impressing me with his content. I Love this channel. some times im even laugh like the video where he jumps from a car. btw cool experiment 👍☝

@@toragold he time traveled in one of his episodes. HE KNOWS IF AGENDA 2021 WILL WORK OR NOT. HE IS TRYING TO MAKE EAERH DEPOPULATED WITH BILL GATES😒💧🫔🥔🥚🦪🤪👦🤪👦🏆🧪😬👦🍒🤯🎀🥔👵😂🍾🥔💚🌄🏆😡😄🔥⛎🤪😎🎀🇨🇳🇨🇳⛎🥚🇨🇳😬🇨🇳🍒🇨🇳🇨🇳🍾🫔🤪🦪🫔👦🍾🦪🥕🍅🫒🥕🥕🍅🔥🎃🥚🔥🥚👱😒💚😒🏆🤷🤷🇨🇳🎀🥚😒🇨🇳🥕🎀💚😡🥚🤯👱👵🥔🎃🥯⛎😂😣🥯🎃😂🥯🎃🥯😫🤷😫🥲😣😫🥲👱😫🥲🏆🧪👱🥲👱🧪🥲👱🧪🥲👱😒👎👵🌄👵👎😬👎🫒😎🥚👱😎🌄🥚😎😬💚😎🏆🎀🥕🇨🇳🎀🇨🇳🥕🍒👎😂🎃🥔🤯😎💧⛎🥲💧😎🤷🏆💚🥚🤯😒😂🍒🥯👎😬⛎💧😎😎💧⛎🔥⛎😎⛎💧🫒🎀🥕😒

@@insectbite1714 are you drunk or having a stroke maybe both and stupid

Science will never run out of content

Yup

Go home, the graduation ceremony ended 4 years ago

I had a pretty cool physics instructor...it’s fun to continue learning by a hands-on UKpostsr.

Ikr

My graduation ceremony will START 4 years seriously

Providing of course the petro industry and the politicians connected to them don't fight to slow it down like the joke of a president Bush, Jr. and Cheney. They did everything they could to slow non petrol fuel source development while pushing petro dependency. That is only one of the reasons that the U.S. is still stuck in stasis with no real impacting developments since the turn of the century.

@@datatwo7405 Well, I'm a supporter of seeing the Petro industry taking the lead on this sort of venture. While they figure out the science of it, we'll buy big trucks and gas guzzlers as incentive to lead to something better. My position is to support the expansion and growth of the current industry throughout the process which frees us from that burden. They've got tons of funds, and some of the smartest guys on the planet, so there's no reason they couldn't flood our markets with infrastructure funds and investment opportunities. If we keep them on our side, they'll be sure to keep us with new engines. There will always be an oil industry, but who knows, they might find that diversification of resources earns them even bigger rewards.

That’s a while away, there are many loose ends there.

It's INCREDIBLY inefficient. First of all you need high voltage, which means heavy batteries and tons of power. And the heavier battery, the harder it is to move the object. Think about how much power you would need to push a car uphill with wind, then think about how heavy your power source would have to be to give that much thrust. Now put that battery pack onto the car and it's too heavy to push again.

@@ringofasho7721 good explanation

Do you know how hot the flame gets? Thanks :)

@Maxime Schweitzer same ngl

Does it say in the description, or is tritium/di-hydrogen a fuel source for ion engines?

@@EchoNovemberDelter tritium and dihydrogen are highly ionized substances, that's all I know. Lol

We use fuel that we build and discovery most of the museum of alien life 4k video ourselves

It's the alpha vector

Very funny

Sounds crazy, but it can be done (ish): ukposts.info/have/v-deo/oHNhhaB-mYOGqX0.html

Technically the truth

@@williamchamberlain2263 They did it they actually spun on a square

@@davisdf3064 crazy isn't it?

all you need is uranium, boron or cadmium, steam turbine, and generator. you have now achived nulear power plant be sure to slow down uranium with boron or cadmium or you will blow off the Earth be sure to be careful

In our imagination, everything is possible and every equipments can be found even the outer space ones.

You have a fork and an outlet dont you?

You know what to do

@@Quagula : You also want to build a step-up coil for that sort of thing. Fortunately, plenty of places sell AC-voltage wire.

@@Quagula hehe bad memories trying that one

Especially because a the 'TIE' in TIE fighter stands for 'Twin Ion Engines'!

@@JJ_Binks that’s dope

@@JJ_Binks sickkk

@@JJ_Binks Actually George Lucas just called them TIE fighters because they looked like bow-ties.

@@Toodoi That's not as cool as 'Twin Ion Engines". I'm going with the cooler definition even if it might be incorrect.

Exactly 100% correct👍😁

But they are the base

@@qureius494 i agree. Even though they are tough classes, having a foundation in them makes these videos much easier to grasp, as well as allowing the viewer to make their own guesses/ hypotheses about the experiments

Syllabi*

3 2 1

:(

Ur subbed to the ppl i watch

@@milord2921 Yeah lol

IS THIS THE REAL MINECRAFT!?!? I love your game!

Father?

@@myrmatta1 Lol, no, not the real Minecraft. So sorry lol. Their channel is ukposts.info and mine is ukposts.info.

@simpsons Bart what are you talking about my dude?? There's no gas in the vacuum of space, but there's gas within atmospheres all over the place. 🤷‍♀

69th like nice

@@Carlo99yehey 96th like ecion

100th like to you oldsilkroad :)

@@edisonhugo8554 Thank you!

@@Carlo99yehey My favorite number 😉

Just research online. This tech has been around for 40+ years. Found not even close to being effective.

Those permanent Tesla coil sparks might be dangerous, but video 5R9VlK2iSZ4 shows you can achieve the same static propeller effect with a Van de Graaff generator.

brobally not because it look suspect

@@ooneybird27 Kinetic energy of the propelled ions moves the device, similar to ion thrusters on satellites.

@@ooneybird27 It's much more efficient to propel the fuel with an ionic engine, rather than just the pressure of the gas - although many spacecraft do use pressurized gas maneuvering jets! Ionic propulsion produces much less thrust at once, meaning you can't accelerate very fast, but it's so much more efficient that you need a very small amount of fuel to propel the spacecraft. You just have to wait longer for it to get where you want it to.

Golden Pepe haha

This comment made me follow this channel.

glad theres something that can make people like you smile, god bless

@@Carlo99yehey love and peace to you and yours x

@@Carlo99yehey my boy calls me Boomer pmsl : )

howMuchTimeTheGasLastsInTheSatteliteUntilItsConsumed?

useYourSpaceBar

@@ovidius2000 WonderingSame...,OrWhereDoesGasComeFrom(Generated/Stored/etc)?

@@ovidius2000 At some point the satellites would just enter the atmosphere if out of fuel, no clue how long they would last

Ion thrusters are used in spaceflight since the 80's

Think levitation.

Philadelphia Experiment

The problem is scale. This works well enough on tiny things but once you start adding mass it gets uneventful very quickly. Think about an ant. Notoriously can carry fifty times its own weight but if you were to scale it up to the size of a car, it wouldn't be able to stand or lift its head. Scale and gravity are a real kick in the crotch.

Exactly what I’ve been researching for 20 years now? Energy is never wasted, only transformed? There’s almost a endless amount of energy out there THAT HAS TO BE TAPPED?

Fighter Jets have using this tech since the end of ww2. Do you think the wings of a fighter jet could possibly carry the amount of fuel needed to power fighter jets? They use microwave plasma engines, look at the exhaust nozzle on the back of a fighter jet when it’s in action, no smoke, they are not burning fuel.

When the answer is worst than the problem !

It will be just 300 ℃ during the day, so not sure hwo that solves our global warming problem. Maybe the -160 ℃ during the night will compensate for it.

I see this as an absolute win

You cant alter the movement of our planet without ejecting mass from it or moving mass closer or further from the center

@@mrono1910 That's why I suggested we might not have an atmosphere afterwards. (Now someone's going to calculate how mach deltaV the atmosphere's worth just to tell me my joke is nonsense)

good luck my friend

@@Carlo99yehey twin ION ENGINE

Take it to the hadron collidor... and send it

Ionic

Haha

Unlucky autocorrect

lol thats probably why his suit stops working at high altitudes

True ionic thrusters works in vacuum, they accelerate the gas and newton laws do the rest.

Except in SE the ion thrusters work worse in the atmosphere.

@@dakat5131 its because se thrusters are hets

yeah until you bring forth the world

Lmao if you’re using Ion thrusters they’re relatively weak for large crafts, they work fine though if I remember correctly.

@@thatoneguy9291 no ion thrusters are not powerful(in kerbal), probably they'll add more parameters(future updates) in sync with latest inventions...

Ion thrusters have incredible ISP and efficiency but TERRIBLE thrust to weight ratio.

ion engines in ksp only work in space but they're really weak

Ion thrusters for space travel DO work in space. In fact their main usefulness is in space because they produce very little thrust for their weight so in the atmosphere they are pretty useless. However because there is no air drag in space the ion thruster's weak thrust can last for years because they are fuel efficient and a weak thrust over years ends up giving you more total acceleration than rocket engines. So Ion Thrusters for modern spacetravel are mostly useful for long lasting missions.

Can I get a quarter? Wya

😂😂😂😂

All of a sudden bake beans and the farting scene in Blazing Saddles comes to mind as a gas source 😂😂

look into "lifters" large but light structure using ionic breeze

Ok

He explains it in a funnier way

if electro boom has the same characteristics as the action lab Ok we are going to do it 1 2 3 A Capacitor just exploded

@@That_Soviet_Memer 😂

@@sharan-kumar Electrboom is the god of Profanity and the devil of free energy

It's funny to imagine a distant future when all aircrafts have been replaced with ion thruster propelled versions & the emission of greenhouse gasses is under control... but suddenly there's a new crisis of too much ozone building up in the atmosphere because of all the ion thrusters.

@@dr.zoidberg8666 yet there are chemicals that remove ozone and most planes fly in space or near space so the ozone will instantly escape

Nice!

Could be wrong but that sounds way to weak

@@benisjammin8926 I want to make a *"I'm too weak!"* joke, but my real answer is it's Star Wars. George Lucas can do whatever he wants. =)

@@benisjammin8926 It's a fictional world 🤣

No oxygen is in space

just don't stick your fingers in the water while it's running...

I believe the viscosity is pretty high for water to make this work... Nice thought though...👍😃

Normally I'd say you'd be right, but the water would decompose into hydrogen and oxygen at that point.

@Deborah Ajao ion propulsion relies on ionization and water can only be ionized to a very small extent. At high voltages it becomes more likely that the water will electrolyse.

@Deborah Ajao it will but I doubt it would work well. At some point it's just going to split off into hydrogen and oxygen. You might get some passable thrust but nothing that could beat even the weakest of electric motors.

I agree. Though I do miss "Hey, Vsauce! Michael here!", and I still love Veritasium, though that is a bit more academically in-depth. Action Lab is a great channel for teaching people not about science as much, but why they should *_enjoy_* learning about the sciences.

He should have like 3 million subscribers.

even if its 1 hour long?

Tamil aa bro

@@sa-zq4eq yeah bro

@@maxtv333thesuperstar3 no ad will be of 1 hour bro...

@LuckyStar no bro

Ya

Send this idea to blacksmith industries.

Hehe, yeah

Yessir

@@abhinav3478 hammer industries

@Mr. Ditkovich that will increase the thrust, but decrease the efficiency, because the exhaust velocity will be lower. For space based ion thrusters, the thrust is limited by the available electric power (usually up to a few kW). If you have more power, you'll have more thrust while maintainig high efficiency. So huge solar panels or a nuclear reactor would be the way to go for large and high-thrust electrically propelled spacecraft.

Me too

Wonder about money lmfao

But the neutral atoms, the "wind" as he puts it, is moved using electrostatic repulsion from the ions, not the force generated on the ions themselves. The reactionary force to this is imparted on the ions, not the source of the field, but since mass is moving in one direction, it generates thrust on the direction of desired movement. And remember, the ions are moving opposite to the desired direction of movement, so the reaction force there is actually *helping*.

Thank you! I had to search the comments just to find one person who knew his explanation was wrong. And it is wrong. VERY WRONG. I've seen a few of his video. HE'S ALMOST ALWAYS WRONG!!!!

@@noabsolutelynot3660 Seriously? You're splitting hairs! It's still basic Newtonian physics. The field makes a force that pushes, and is in turned, pushed. This guy is still COMPLETELY AND TOTALLY wrong.

@@MaxSMoke777 Take a deep breath and calm down.