This is why we can't have nice things

  Переглядів 21,888,218

Veritasium

Veritasium

3 роки тому

This video is about stuff: light bulbs, printers, phones and why they aren't better. Go to NordVPN.com/veritasium and use code VERITASIUM to get a 2-year plan plus 1 additional month with a huge discount. It’s risk free with Nord’s 30 day money-back guarantee!
References:
The Man in the White Suit - ve42.co/Suit
London, B. (1932). Ending the depression through planned obsolescence. - ve42.co/London32
Slade, G. (2009). Made to break: Technology and obsolescence in America. Harvard University Press - ve42.co/madetobreak
Krajewski, M. (2014). The great lightbulb conspiracy. IEEE spectrum, 51(10), 56-61. - ve42.co/Phoebus
Planet Money, The Phoebus Cartel - ve42.co/PMobs
The Light Bulb Conspiracy - • The Light Bulb Conspiracy
Special thanks to Patreon supporters: Mac Malkawi, Oleksii Leonov, Michael Schneider, Jim Osmun, Tyson McDowell, Ludovic Robillard, jim buckmaster, fanime96, Juan Benet, Ruslan Khroma, Robert Blum, Richard Sundvall, Lee Redden, Vincent, Lyvann Ferrusca, Alfred Wallace, Arjun Chakroborty, Joar Wandborg, Clayton Greenwell, Pindex, Michael Krugman, Cy 'kkm' K'Nelson, Sam Lutfi, Ron Neal
Written by Derek Muller and Petr Lebedev
Animation by Ivy Tello
Filmed by Derek Muller and Raquel Nuno
Edited by Derek Muller
Video supplied by Getty Images
Music by Jonny Hyman and from epidemicsound.com"Aquatic Planet", "Rhythm of Dreams", "Tread Lightly", "Unexpected Visitors", "Curved Mirrors" "Drunken Lullaby" "Fluorescent Lights"
Thumbnail by Raquel Nuno and Karri Denise

КОМЕНТАРІ: 51 000
@rossmanngroup
@rossmanngroup 3 роки тому
8.5 million people watch you, and you planted a seed today in their mind about right to repair. Thank you.
@ginichimaru5476
@ginichimaru5476 3 роки тому
🖖🏽
@CusomPCs
@CusomPCs 3 роки тому
Yooo the og
@aadityachhitarka1938
@aadityachhitarka1938 3 роки тому
I expected you here
@junkbucket50
@junkbucket50 3 роки тому
LOUIS!
@Fleurlean4
@Fleurlean4 3 роки тому
I knew you’d like this
@burnsblownglass2514
@burnsblownglass2514 2 роки тому
A GM engineer once told me, "it's easy to make a car last forever, getting one to break down in 7 years is the trick"
@jameslangridge1674
@jameslangridge1674 2 роки тому
I aways thought it was getting one to break down the day after your warranty expires is the trick. 😁
@robertromero8692
@robertromero8692 2 роки тому
An example of why I will never buy a GM product. Hondas and Toyotas are more durable.
@burnsblownglass2514
@burnsblownglass2514 2 роки тому
@@robertromero8692 Nissan and Volvo are my preferences
@thatkidkgosi
@thatkidkgosi 2 роки тому
Ohh my gosh. That explains alot
@effincasuals8877
@effincasuals8877 2 роки тому
But as Toyota has shown us,a lasting car,equals more sales.
@martinstu8400
@martinstu8400 Місяць тому
I work for an unnamed software company X. When a new extremely fast solution was found to one of the algorithms, sold to customers, management decided to put sleep() function in some places to throttle the perofmance, so it matches the old algorithm. They said: "we will remove some throttles each quarter release and charge for the speedup we're doing".
@jonatanrullman
@jonatanrullman 15 днів тому
You work for X?
@mobilephil244
@mobilephil244 15 днів тому
Right. That's it. I'm the CEO of X and my new lawyers will be in touch with you tomorrow (I sent the old ones to landfill).
@ghaith2580
@ghaith2580 10 днів тому
@@jonatanrullman he meant x as in a randomly generated letter because he doesn’t want to say where he works, not x the elon musk company
@LeZylox
@LeZylox 9 днів тому
How can you live with your guilt?
@senatorarmstrong689
@senatorarmstrong689 9 днів тому
​@@LeZyloxhe's a lich
@jrstrange123
@jrstrange123 5 місяців тому
A JD tractor my grandfather owned back in the 40’s is to this day running strong. It’s a beast that has outlasted three tractors I have bought since the late 90’s.
@jennifermarlow.
@jennifermarlow. 2 місяці тому
We had a fridge from the early 50s. It was still working in the early 2000s, when my parents threw it out (it was at the country home). For no reason. It just ticked me off. They have already replaced the one they replaced it with. SMDH
@ScoutSniper3124
@ScoutSniper3124 3 роки тому
When I was a young boy and my Grandfather complained "They keep making this junk cheaper so you have to keep buying it"... he must have said that a hundred times to me over the years... turns out Grandpa knew what the hell he was talking about.
@AnotherAvaibleName
@AnotherAvaibleName 3 роки тому
Grandpa doesn't have all those years for no reason. The greatest tragedy is that us young people tend to ignore their wisdom.
@lsswappedcessna
@lsswappedcessna 3 роки тому
All us young people turn up our noses at the 'boomers' for their often seemingly backwards ways of thinking, but they have wisdom on things that we're clueless about.
@mikopiko
@mikopiko 3 роки тому
@@AnotherAvaibleName YOU SAID IT
@thany3
@thany3 3 роки тому
This is true even in most of our lifetimes. Mobile phones used to be virtually indestructible (with normal use). And the screen was made from plastic, which scratched like a MF, but didn't crack.
@krzysztofczarnecki8238
@krzysztofczarnecki8238 3 роки тому
It's literally killing -two- -three- four birds with one stone for the manufacturers - while charging the same amount of money, using less material/lower rating components costs them less, and at the same time they last a shorter amount of time. This also allows a smaller enclosure, that is more appealing to customers, and that in turn helps further reduce lifespan by making the product heat up inside more, and making it less mechanically durable. Just look at every device with more than 1 transistor in it made in the last decade and a half - the trend is to make them thin and "pretty" and try to shove that into people's brains as "fashion", and use brittle and easily scratched materials, while cheaping out on everything inside.
@DAG_42
@DAG_42 3 роки тому
As an electrical engineer, I can assure you... We are literally educated in school about how to design for the desired failure timeframe. It seems criminal
@ToroMoto
@ToroMoto 3 роки тому
Any more info on this? So you remember the textbook or course code? I'd love to do some more reading on this
@MigueART
@MigueART 3 роки тому
@@ToroMoto I would like to read more on this too.
@mrsearaphim4077
@mrsearaphim4077 3 роки тому
Guess I'm lucky my teachers were vividly against this.
@instagib783
@instagib783 3 роки тому
@@ToroMoto @miguelonas Start with the phrase 'Mean Time to Failure' or MTTF and go from there. IMO, the concept itself isn't nefarious but it can be used that way.
@Growzy101
@Growzy101 3 роки тому
It is unmoral and seed of corrupt. Humans don't deserve anything less than an a asteroid wipe.
@theresespencer2827
@theresespencer2827 3 місяці тому
We bought our house in 1999, and it came with an old brown electric stove, built by American Motors Corporation sometime in the 1970's or so. It has outlasted all the other appliances we bought when we moved in.
@james__anna_burns4885
@james__anna_burns4885 2 місяці тому
my house was built in the 60’s. the same oven has been running, and even the broiler still works
@jennifermarlow.
@jennifermarlow. 2 місяці тому
@@james__anna_burns4885 My family's country home has a wood / propane Moffat stove from the 40s, still in working order.
@rafabonati7757
@rafabonati7757 2 місяці тому
My parents bought a house in 1963 that was built in 1928 from the original owners. The front entrance had an unusually shaped light bulb. It must have been the original bulb from when the home was built. It was only turned on occasionally. When my Mom sold the house, we unscrewed that bulb and it’s installed in a closet at my sister’s home. It still works. It’s not continuously on of course. But that makes it even more special because turning it on and off weakens the tungsten more than keeping it on! I think the tungsten filament must be quite strong and thick. Yep, they don’t make things like they used to sure applies to this light bulb. 💡
@susanrabideau9089
@susanrabideau9089 2 місяці тому
I instantly thought of that lightbulb that you took when mom moved, haha!
@Jellyf0x
@Jellyf0x 3 роки тому
The thing I hate most about planned obsolescence is that it assumes we have endless resources. It's terrible for our planet.
@newyorthtimes4496
@newyorthtimes4496 3 роки тому
@Sidemen AFTV Clips & More ehh, 3d printing still uses "resources."
@kinghassy334
@kinghassy334 3 роки тому
Its the same with fashion, cloths used to last much longer, now its more profitable to sell seasonal wear that has to be replaced every 3 months
@Batzik94
@Batzik94 3 роки тому
Completely agree and the exact same applies to capitalism
@Chris-mc2bq
@Chris-mc2bq 3 роки тому
@Sidemen AFTV Clips & More I didn't know you could 3d print all the elements in electronics like gold colbalt and phosphorous lmao.
@EatMyShortsAU
@EatMyShortsAU 3 роки тому
True and how often do we can upgrade our electronics? So much, e-waste is created..
@sazzadurrahmansakib1687
@sazzadurrahmansakib1687 3 роки тому
>makes a bulb that lasts forever >sell it to everyone in the world >no one needs any bulb anymore >leaves
@dienosorpo
@dienosorpo 3 роки тому
We need a hero
@juanitome1327
@juanitome1327 3 роки тому
@@dienosorpo we had one. He was named Nikola Tesla. He intended to give everyone free and wireless electricity forever. He had the technology, the science behind it but not the money. He was starved to death and chased down by bankers and other scientists with more capitalist intentions (Thomas Edison) aaaand he died mysteriously in a hotel room and all of his discoveries were “stolen” and well-kept under rocks to this day
@s1tes667
@s1tes667 3 роки тому
@@juanitome1327 he tried helping humanity while everyone helped themselves
@GamerGod_88
@GamerGod_88 3 роки тому
>Cover yourself in oil
@jungleballs5593
@jungleballs5593 3 роки тому
@@juanitome1327 it is actually proven that wireless transfer of electricity is incredibly inefficient and it is very difficult to make something completely free.
@user-hf3dy9xc8x
@user-hf3dy9xc8x 3 місяці тому
I went full LED early about 10 years ago, and as you said, didn't expect to ever have to change them. But I have had to change some bulbs out twice already. And some of these were name brands (Philips, CREE), and other cheap brands performed about equally well. I suspect there's some planned obsolescence in LED bulbs, too. Regardless, their low power consumption and cooler temps make them great, but I wish they lasted longer.
@Brent-jj6qi
@Brent-jj6qi Місяць тому
Most LED bulbs are designed to cook themselves pretty quickly
@USNAirpower
@USNAirpower 20 днів тому
I was going to say the same thing. We're sold on them lasting for 25+ years....but they realistically only last 1/5th of that.
@fewworddotrick
@fewworddotrick 19 днів тому
I'm looking forward to a class action lawsuit regarding all the LED lights that claim they last like a decade. I'll probably be awarded at least a few dollars.
@holden002
@holden002 12 днів тому
LED lights are also bad for you. 😮
@Jaymac720
@Jaymac720 6 днів тому
By cooler temps, do you mean they produce less heat or do you mean color temperature?
@johnpearson492
@johnpearson492 Місяць тому
My grandparents have a lightbulb in a sealed housing in their shower. They bought the house in 1965 and it was bult in 1946. They have never changed the bulb and it still works. Use it every time they use the shower.
@davidletasi3322
@davidletasi3322 2 роки тому
My aunt moved into her family home in 1919 at age 14 and had a 1913 Edison light bulb on her second story stair well. She lived in the house untill her death in 2002. She replaced that bulb a year before her death and she gave it to me and I have kept it right up to writing this comment and the other day plugged it in to see if it's still works. Bright as ever! Going on 108 years old.
@xyz-pg3zd
@xyz-pg3zd 2 роки тому
wow
@netshaek
@netshaek 2 роки тому
Nobody else like the comment it’s at exactly 108 likes
@SrCremeify
@SrCremeify 2 роки тому
@@netshaek I was going to do it until i read ur comment hahahahah
@ericmcclelland7151
@ericmcclelland7151 2 роки тому
Someone already ruined it so +1 like for every extra year?
@2n974
@2n974 2 роки тому
That happened
@ryanhogan4743
@ryanhogan4743 3 роки тому
My 93yr old great Aunt just told me that her first refrigerator from late 1960's finally stopped working.
@davidanderson2357
@davidanderson2357 3 роки тому
Is it still under warranty? Haw haw.
@delanamanuel1451
@delanamanuel1451 3 роки тому
My husband's friend bought my grandma's fridge from the 50s after she died. It just needed new seals around the door.
@pascal2085
@pascal2085 3 роки тому
I think that newer fridges don't last as long not purely out of planned obsolence. Companies are forced by law to make the devices more and more efficient and this comes at a cost.
@vadipp
@vadipp 3 роки тому
Probably she just need to replace the thermostat or something. I bet the compressor motor is still good.
@lsswappedcessna
@lsswappedcessna 3 роки тому
Refurb the compressor or whatever is broken, PLEASE do not let her throw out the old fridge. It may just be a fridge, but it's a relic, too. A relic of a better time for the reliability of household appliances.
@Andrew10107
@Andrew10107 25 днів тому
When i was a young boy my grandfather said to me " Son you'll grow up, grow old and die"...he was a very wise man. Miss you gramps.
@iamnotjesuschrist
@iamnotjesuschrist 25 днів тому
My grandfather always told me, you could wake up dead tomorrow. So live every day and take nothing for granted
@erlendranheim2638
@erlendranheim2638 12 днів тому
@@iamnotjesuschrist He said, "One day you'll leave this world behind So live a life you will remember" My father told me when I was just a child
@-Just_Justin-
@-Just_Justin- 8 місяців тому
As a service technician I can agree with planned obsolescence. Late 1990s and early 2000s vehicles were built with durability in mind where as vehicles from 2005 on up seem to have lesser quality components in them. Iirc I believe I read somewhere that dealerships would expect the average consumer to trade in around 100k miles for a new vehicle.
@MidnightGreen4649
@MidnightGreen4649 2 місяці тому
I wish all engineering courses required students to train as service technicians for some type of machine or industry. People who think AI will do our jobs for us are short-sighted and downright lazy. Engineers who are okay with making products that are poorly designed should be ashamed of themselves. I plan to learn some mechanic-ing this year, as an engineering student I hope I will one day meet other engineers who give a damn and maybe follow my childhood dream of making cool things... I will say this though: for some classic sports cars, Nissan and Mazda seem to be making new OEM components for owners to keep their cars running. I hope that becomes a thing as it's getting harder to find critical components for some of these cars.
@-Just_Justin-
@-Just_Justin- 2 місяці тому
@@MidnightGreen4649 I couldn't agree with you more. I can't say how many times I've seen a well designed part install or perform poorly. Some things seem like a good idea but in practicality it doesn't work as well. While technology has proved beneficial in many ways over the years it doesn't or will not replace genuine intuition or a deeper understanding of something. Computers only see inputs and outputs at its most simplest form. Having more people with a mindset like yours will make the automotive industry better if the corporate aspect rolls with it. Many things come into mind when making a part and mass cost is one of them.
@MidnightGreen4649
@MidnightGreen4649 2 місяці тому
@@-Just_Justin- I think your reply has inspired me to talk to the engineering faculty at my college so that there can be more education and discussion about designing with an emphasis on the right to repair and from the perspective of not just the end user but also understanding technicians. We had several lectures by various engineering professors in my introductory courses. I don't see why we shouldn't also learn from mechanics, machinists, and repairmen. Having the students complete training as technicians might be a bit much, but I think it's possible to make it work. The goal, after all, is to shift the philosophy of engineering and product design to what it once was.
@-Just_Justin-
@-Just_Justin- 2 місяці тому
@@MidnightGreen4649 that would be a monumental step into a more productive direction. If the technician doing the repair can understand the same concept as the engineers and vice versa, operations would become more uniform in a sense. Most of these things are now so divided that one department doesn't talk to another but one relies on another. Having a more direct form of communication during the development phase could ultimately save time and money.
@MidnightGreen4649
@MidnightGreen4649 2 місяці тому
@@-Just_Justin- Indeed. as cheesy as it sounds, I just have a genuine love for the art.
@simarpreetsinghmamik
@simarpreetsinghmamik 3 роки тому
The saddest example is that of school textbooks, each new edition has the most negligible changes in content.
@simarpreetsinghmamik
@simarpreetsinghmamik 3 роки тому
​@@yeager6882 Definitely. In one year Sue goes to buy 20 apples for $5, in another year it could be Joe, buying 25 apples for $10. It's hard to keep up.
@elmo4672
@elmo4672 3 роки тому
@@simarpreetsinghmamik These are straight-up factual statements.. it's best to use second-hand books.
@hubertstefaniak158
@hubertstefaniak158 3 роки тому
@@elmo4672 that's the point - You can't, because schools often require You to have a latest edition.
@RickyC0626
@RickyC0626 3 роки тому
Also the newest editions have less pirated copies, so it's less likely for the answer key to be available for students to use as reference
@alephkasai9384
@alephkasai9384 3 роки тому
In my country for primary and secondary schools there's a program to borrow the books from the students last year. The students last year give their books to the school and the newer students have these books handed to them. If you lose or destroy your book you do have to pay to replace them.
@CryptoLorenzo
@CryptoLorenzo 2 роки тому
My mum had an oven that lasted 30 years, fully functioning right till the end. Then when she got a replacement, the technician told her that the company who manufactured them went broke because their ovens very rarely broke down. It's sad that we've gone from one extreme of excellent durability and reliability to planned obsolescence.
@Daemien21
@Daemien21 2 роки тому
Because we cant find or change an economic solution to this as a species
@DavidMishchenko
@DavidMishchenko 2 роки тому
Which company?
@gizzyguzzi
@gizzyguzzi 2 роки тому
how long have you had your car? I am driving a 25 y.o. car with 200k miles on it. Impossible 40 years ago (without a complete rebuild at least once)
@CryptoLorenzo
@CryptoLorenzo 2 роки тому
@@DavidMishchenko It was a company named St. George, here in Australia, which is now defunct. You will see a bank and rugby league team bearing the same name, but they're completely unrelated.
@CryptoLorenzo
@CryptoLorenzo 2 роки тому
@@gizzyguzzi My original comment relates to an old oven that lasted up to Jan 2020. However, my car is 7 years' old to date so too early to tell how long it'll last.
@panscraft_7793
@panscraft_7793 3 місяці тому
it's called Capitalism
@vidprimorac8468
@vidprimorac8468 16 днів тому
Ah the worst element of the periodic table
@Gordy-io8sb
@Gordy-io8sb 6 днів тому
@@vidprimorac8468 The suffix is "ium" most commonly, never "ism".
@stageiiwappie950
@stageiiwappie950 День тому
more like atheism and greed, no morals
@jeromem9946
@jeromem9946 8 місяців тому
Planned obsolescence is quite depressing, but always good to keep in mind. Thanks a lot for this video ! 🙏
@engineeringlore3349
@engineeringlore3349 3 роки тому
I studied Latin in high school, and there is a passage, in the Satyricon, in which Caesar is presented by a material that seems glass, as it is transparent, but when the artisan that presented it throws it on the ground and it does not break, instead he picks it up and works it back in the original shape, like it was plastic. In the story, Caesar asks the guy if someone else knows that secret, when he says no one does, Caesar has the man killed and the object destroyed in fear that gold would lose value. Guess the Man in the White Suit wasn’t the first story like this!
@alessiopani
@alessiopani 3 роки тому
Yess, in the dinner of Trimalchio ( Trimalchione)
@XmarkedSpot
@XmarkedSpot 3 роки тому
Name checks out
@epauletshark3793
@epauletshark3793 3 роки тому
I heard that it was with emperor tiberius.
@Cloud-dq1mr
@Cloud-dq1mr 3 роки тому
No idea if this is true but it sounds horrible. Moreso than his personm from the little i know about Caesar the one thing that always amazed me was always his forces, and especially the engineering feats of his forces. Like, people did this 2000 years ago, wtf? But considering your reply I guess he's the original "The Man", to be hated and scorned.
@Lobstrominous
@Lobstrominous 3 роки тому
interesting story. (small correction it seems it was Tiberius Caesar.) most claims are that it is fictitious. The Satyricon is fiction but who knows, once you've had everyone killed.....
@dasoulfoodbuffet
@dasoulfoodbuffet 3 роки тому
Imagine the trillions of tons of unnecessary garbage planned obsolescence has caused our planet, the poisoning of our rivers and air and soil... It's so backward and disgusting. 😞
@kristoffer3000
@kristoffer3000 3 роки тому
Welcome to capitalism!
@cello9877
@cello9877 3 роки тому
All for the love of money
@Diet0r
@Diet0r 3 роки тому
Imagin the trillions of dollars lanned obsolescence has caused our planet
@dextrodemon
@dextrodemon 3 роки тому
ah but you can make money moving the garbage around, so it's a trade off. that's why capitalism is so beloved and will def not lead to the death of the planet in one way or another
@sasper6623
@sasper6623 3 роки тому
@@dextrodemon just moving it around... not getting rid of it or recycling it. recycling isnt profitable so thats why they dont actually do it. its a scam, only a few materials or plastics can be recycled to make profit, otherwise it doesnt happen.
@user-we7ko6ze8u
@user-we7ko6ze8u 7 місяців тому
Sorry I have so recently learned of your channel. This topic will continue to be of interest. Asked Subaru of America to help pay for a repair to a ten year old Crosstrek, I had purchased July,14,2023. Dealership said this oil leak was bad, and that it was leaking on to the catalytic converter, a potential to start a fire. They recommend contacting Subaru of America for help, since I had no resources after the purchase to pay the $2353.00 repair to fix the dangerous leak. Subaru of America basically said, "Cars ware out, sorry you bought a used Subaru." I will have to save up for this repair. Dealership I purchased it from was so kind to refund $500.00 toward this repair.
@davidbrown4271
@davidbrown4271 2 місяці тому
Sorry it’s wear out
@DarkElfDiva
@DarkElfDiva 22 дні тому
A dealership doing the right thing? Do you live in bizarro world?
@davidbrown4271
@davidbrown4271 21 день тому
Nice try , and sorry about your repair cost , cars are a bitch
@pabloherrmann724
@pabloherrmann724 3 місяці тому
As my prof used to say "only an engineer can build a bridge that just barely holds up"
@PeterLawton
@PeterLawton Місяць тому
That's actually a tongue-in-cheek saying praising the ability to do a good job *cost effectively* (being responsible with public funds).
@sarahschulz7987
@sarahschulz7987 2 роки тому
My parents recently got a new microwave and gave me their old one they got for their wedding - I'm 25 and warming up my leftovers in the same microwave my baby food was warmed in... pretty amazing. I would love if everything lasted forever. Planned obsolescence feels like such a waste of resources.
@Dimchastichni
@Dimchastichni 2 роки тому
but but, infinite growth! :)
@-hiro-5995
@-hiro-5995 2 роки тому
It’s just a conspiracy, it’s impossible to hold cartels that court control so much today, the strategy does exist, apple has done it,
@thornblackwell5749
@thornblackwell5749 2 роки тому
@@-hiro-5995 Steve Jobs did it. Apple has sold its soul since then.
@jackr2287
@jackr2287 2 роки тому
A waste of time, ambition, and effort. But I wonder if it's a character of a downturn of civilizational spirit, when it occurs writ large.
@terrabiker
@terrabiker 2 роки тому
yeah , i had to replace the 20yo microwave only bcs we got new power breakers that couldn't handle the peak load when turning on the MW. It didn't have a soft start...
@ohaider123
@ohaider123 3 роки тому
Somewhere, Louis Rossmann got an extra 20 minutes of sleep because of the release of this video.
@fr0styy202
@fr0styy202 3 роки тому
HAHAHAHA
@PiniiXever
@PiniiXever 3 роки тому
Literally
@TheBetterGame
@TheBetterGame 3 роки тому
Louis is going on vacation. Not a joke, in his last video he said he's taking a break and going away.
@randomjasmicisrandom
@randomjasmicisrandom 3 роки тому
The poor guy needs it. Have you seen the bags under his eyes!?
@skydivekrazy76
@skydivekrazy76 3 роки тому
Lol, you bet.
@AudioFileZ
@AudioFileZ 4 місяці тому
I enjoyed your video. I used to believe a lot of things not the least of which is that products keep progressing both in technology and longevity. As a young man in the late seventies I began to doubt a lot of things not the least of which is that my very respected government told me a tale about Lee Harvey Oswald being a lone assassin. I noticed cars were not as durable in many ways and ever more difficult to actually repair. Same for appliances in the home. About light bulbs...I noticed the first iteration of CFL lightbulbs never lasted as claimed. Later, same with early LED bulbs. As for phones, I never had a replaceable battery model past the Samsung Galaxy 3 and as a result often dealt with battery issues making my mind up to replace before I wanted to actually do so. Now, at 64-years old I see that what you're video is about isn't conspiracy hearsay. It's part of the actual product specs we all buy. In my little corner of an industry, footwear retail, I've seen the continuous cheapening of products to allow higher GPMs because purchasers have to replace footwear quite often due to both decreased durability and fashion pressures. One segment that held on to durability a bit longer within footwear was the work segment of boots. Outside of small companies building niche boots all of the major makers "dumbed down" durability to a point it couldn't be missed. This continues. During the pandemic the longest lasting mass maker of American maker of US made work boots shut down their 2 plants in Carthage Missouri never to re-open those plants. It's probably not the maker you're thinking of and I won't mention names, but those boots lasted an average of five to seven years with one or two heel replacements and no full-sole replacement needed. And this is in the toughest environments. Small dealers around the country expressed horror, but because the latest corporate imagining of how to sell these products no longer wants to depend on independent small dealers it hardly made a ripple. After three years of not being able to get any of these boots to sell I found out they were going to reintroduce them (some with same look and stock numbers) as made in Cambodia models. I've yet to be able to get any of these to sell, but I know it won't be the same. The leather uppers will not be tanned to the same high standards. The heart of the boot, which is the sole. was made by the best US sole maker in NY ,the new ones, while retaining the look, will not be made of the same very tweaked PU raw material and exacting standards of the US made one. I predict these boots will last a third, at best, of the old ones which fits in with what your video reveals. And, the wholesale price is almost as much as the last ones this brand made in the Missouri plants insuring maximum gross profit margins unattainable, so the brand claims, if they continued to make the boots here. Footwear companies do not answer to their consumer and are ran by accountants. They answer to Wall Street and pure greed. I've been around long enough to remember when this wasn't the rule of the day. This makes me glad to be in the twilight of my career. Things are not being made better, smaller retailers are being kicked to the curb, the climate of both product and distribution has changed . I'm being marginalized before I can be wholly cancelled. I've made a decent life for my family as the third generation of a shoe business over one-hundred years old. But, you will see less and less of my kind every year...and, you'll pay more for footwear that lasts less and less. How is this good?
@monkeynumbernine
@monkeynumbernine 7 місяців тому
I have one of those lightbulbs, I've had it since I was about 10 years old...my grandfather gave it to me and told me it would never fail. That was more than 40 years ago. It was old when he acquired it.
@SirSpartAfterDark
@SirSpartAfterDark 3 роки тому
"Good products are bad for the economy" is something I never thought I would hear.
@tyapca7
@tyapca7 3 роки тому
Neither did I, although I knew it ;-) Economy is about psychology, not technology.
@EclecticBuddha
@EclecticBuddha 3 роки тому
Just another way to say that broken windows are good for the economy. That's Paul krugman levels of stupid.
@uhohhotdog
@uhohhotdog 3 роки тому
They’re great for the economy. They’re bad for profits
@actsnfacts
@actsnfacts 3 роки тому
I would put it differently: "The western capitalist post industrial revolution paradigm is bad for good products" And no, I am not sugesting what ever would be better than that. I wish I knew.
@nowonmetube
@nowonmetube 3 роки тому
That's why the system must change
@HECKproductions
@HECKproductions 3 роки тому
engineer: we made it last up to 25.000 hours business person: great now make it last 1.000 hours engineers: ಠ_ಠ
@tmpEngine
@tmpEngine 3 роки тому
engineer: but why that's stupid ! business person: shut up if you wanna keep that salary engineer: okay
@Rhinoch8
@Rhinoch8 3 роки тому
@@tmpEngine my experience as a corporate engineer. kept my job 1 week. left with big balls and an empty wallet.
@juniorsir9521
@juniorsir9521 3 роки тому
So basically people will only have good lasting things in paradise when all dishonest people are gone. I guess this world is currently catering the rich and greedy. Sad.
@iIiWARHEADiIi
@iIiWARHEADiIi 3 роки тому
Make 25 lamps from materials out of one
@killercat970
@killercat970 3 роки тому
@@juniorsir9521 or when the engineers and workers have more say in the operations and practices of industry. A democratization of the workplace, if you will. Less power to CEOs and shareholders and more power to the backbone: the producers and laborers.
@colebennett1785
@colebennett1785 Місяць тому
The fact that this video opened up with a Harbor Freight ad is the most beautiful irony available on the planet
@armoniqfields8016
@armoniqfields8016 6 місяців тому
I got training on cell phone/laptop/flat tv repair. I have an eye to see parts designed to fail. It's an excellent business to get into. People will literally give you broken items before they go buy new 1's.
@besmart
@besmart 3 роки тому
On the other hand, UKposts is filled with lots of unplanned obsolescence
@DyslexicMitochondria
@DyslexicMitochondria 3 роки тому
Haha yep
@mattearenzi8972
@mattearenzi8972 3 роки тому
​@@DyslexicMitochondria OMG Hi! I watch your channeI. Absolutely love your videos bro. U made me fall in love with science haha
@gradientO
@gradientO 3 роки тому
Lol
@abhaykashyapa
@abhaykashyapa 3 роки тому
Yeah! I love your videos too
@somespecies
@somespecies 3 роки тому
Literally everything now is filled with lots of unplanned obsolescence
@mauritius5892
@mauritius5892 3 роки тому
Planned obsolence has also a huge environmental impact. It is not sustainable to buy every year a new phone or a new car. Therefore I think that companies have a huge responsibility not to use planned obsolence but to offer more repair and upgrade services to customers.
@thezfunk
@thezfunk 3 роки тому
Europe addresses this by forcing the companies to take back end-of-life products and recycle them. Now, there is an incentive to not get them back thereby providing a reason to extend their life. It is always about changing motivations and incentives.
@Hotrob_J
@Hotrob_J 3 роки тому
Why are we set up so the survival of our species is reliant on companies being responsible and moral? A responsible and moral company is a company either out of business or bought by a bigger one and shut down.
@juniorvonclaire3576
@juniorvonclaire3576 3 роки тому
No, they don’t have a responsibility to “save the planet!” And we don’t have a right to most goods and services. Just be grateful and quit whining.
@kamrankazemi8646
@kamrankazemi8646 3 роки тому
@@juniorvonclaire3576 Why are you defending people literally selling you bad products? How are you that brainwashed? Do you not know how to stand up for what’s right?
@predatoryanimal6397
@predatoryanimal6397 3 роки тому
totally agree consumerism and obsolete design are the worse thing that has happened to society and environment.
@hobbyhermit66
@hobbyhermit66 8 місяців тому
They did it to LED's too, through the circuitry inside the bulb.
@carkawalakhatulistiwa
@carkawalakhatulistiwa 8 місяців тому
Yes they do
@ujona
@ujona 8 місяців тому
Yes, I definitely remember this from economic class back in high school...planned obsolescence. Thus, I take apart all my electronics if something was wrong and my engineering background helps.
@Kpeters
@Kpeters 3 роки тому
As an industrial designer I can honestly say that’s one of the most frustrating aspects of the industry. One always wants to design a product with the best characteristics.
@sparkeyjones6261
@sparkeyjones6261 3 роки тому
I'm sure it is. In your occupation you can identify and fix flaws in many designs that lead to reduced lifespan. It's really too bad most companies are no longer interested in selling a product designed with longevity in mind. But, I wonder how much of this is due to so many consumers basing their purchasing decisions mainly on cost? Our grandparent's generations were much different. They were willing to pay much higher prices for products that not only functioned better, but lasted longer.
@Alex-kh8zj
@Alex-kh8zj 3 роки тому
@@sparkeyjones6261 The disposable income has gone down, it's not a mindset. It's not having the money to make big purchases.
@Kpeters
@Kpeters 3 роки тому
@@sparkeyjones6261 that is also true. New and shiny for most consumers is more important than functional and long lasting. Even if the design is great. Look at the old Mercedes Benz from before the 90's. Great machines that with proper maintenance will outlast you. Can't say the same for newer cars. People used to keep they cars, washing machines, refrigerators for decades. And it's worse than turning your back on identifying flaws, it's actually designing something and then figuring out how to make it go bad. It's basically destroying your design.
@rubiconnn
@rubiconnn 3 роки тому
People are suckers. They'll eat up marketing and use it as brand loyalty instead of just relying on data and companies know this.
@patrickm1533
@patrickm1533 3 роки тому
I'm also an industrial designer and I honestly haven't come across any projects that I would consider to have planned obsolescence. All components, especially small components, have a cycle life, nothing lasts forever. You can make things last longer but it usually comes at some other cost like money or size or performance, etc.; and at a certain point, the product no longer meets it's requirements and lasts far longer than it would become technologically obsolete. Generally speaking my clients would prefer the last impression of their product NOT to be it crapping out.
@rvallenduuk
@rvallenduuk 3 роки тому
You completely glossed over the biggest problem with this obsolescence: resources. The planet isn't infinite. If we keep producing cheap produces and replace them every two year we will run out of material at some point. Nevermind the amount of single-use plastic in the oceans.
@TheGaboom
@TheGaboom 3 роки тому
Depends how good our ability to recycle is; it's not like the resources are deleted from existence I imagine some generations from now, there'll be well established practices collecting those resources out of the oceans Broadly speaking though, I do agree. Since deliberate obsolescence expedites resource drain faster than necessary, making a large portion of the resource inaccessible without new recycling or refurbishing practices
@yomommashaus
@yomommashaus 3 роки тому
@@TheGaboom Ditto. There are more and more companies figuring out how to profit from recycling traditionally "unrecyclable" objects. The future is in efficient recycling, high quality products, powerfully efficient clean energy sources like fusion, and alternate materials such as in asteroids, to name a few.
@jengleheimerschmitt7941
@jengleheimerschmitt7941 3 роки тому
On the other hand, you completely gloss over the bigest problem with predictions of resource scarcity: historically resources overwhelmingly become less scarce and less expensive rather than more scarce -as use increases. Salt, food, coal, aluminum, and books are reasonably substantial examples. It's been a very long time since we've had a salt shortage. Unless you think we've hit peak-human-ingenuity already, I expect that trend will continue rather than reverse.
@yomommashaus
@yomommashaus 3 роки тому
@@jengleheimerschmitt7941 I agree - human ingenuity is supreme really and even facing such hurdles as overpopulation, energy needs, food shortages, rare metal shortages, etc, I believe we are already working on solutions and will overcome.
@phasechange5053
@phasechange5053 3 роки тому
yes and people can talk about recycling all day but most of it will go into a landfill . its completely wasteful
@Irish_For_Life1842
@Irish_For_Life1842 2 місяці тому
I believe this video is 100% accurate. In my life I have had the experience to speak to former employees from different manufacturers. They all reported that if the company wanted to make their products last 20 times longer, they could do so with a very small increase in cost relative to the type of product. Another example in my life is computer operating systems. Windows wanted to update to Windows 10 but I passed on it because I loved my current laptop, which ran perfect, and I hated Windows 10. The very first update AFTER the offer expired killed my laptop. Searching online at Windows, Windows chat rooms and talking to computer repair companies, they all reported to me that a massive number of people all had the same thing happen to them. I can't tell you that it was in fact on purpose, but what do you think? Forgive my typos and grammatical errors.
@jacobbell1503
@jacobbell1503 8 місяців тому
Thank you for bringing this to peoples attention. The poor are a huge victim of this greed.
@realjw57
@realjw57 2 роки тому
The worse part is when they apply the same mindset to health care and pharmaceuticals.
@sapien82
@sapien82 2 роки тому
conveniently ignored it seems
@chrisdock8804
@chrisdock8804 2 роки тому
Sackler family goes brrrrr
@madattaktube
@madattaktube 2 роки тому
This logic only works in the USA though - in the rest of the world healthcare is not a free market and is extremely tightly regulated, as well as containing research funded by charities and government organizations.
@MaryAnnNytowl
@MaryAnnNytowl 2 роки тому
@@madattaktube /\ _This!_ /\
@lofity6668
@lofity6668 2 роки тому
decrease people's lifespan so they have lots of kids, then money go brrr
@cookiecrumbler2345
@cookiecrumbler2345 2 роки тому
it took me a while to realize that this video is LITERALLY EXPLAINING WHY WE CANT HAVE NICE THINGS
@codehardr1209
@codehardr1209 2 роки тому
Yes we can and we have. Every time when I look at some new phone I ask myself if my current one can do 95% of the new one. If it can, then why spend the money? Same with computers or any gadget. I use galaxy s8 and I'm happy with it, It can play music, take pictures, play games, run apps, and even can fit into pocket. Why should I buy a new one? Same with a computer. Have a macbook from about the same time I bought my s8. Great screen, fast enough for work, editing pictures, playing movies, browsing web. What else can a new laptop do that one from 4 or 5 years ago can't? There was a time when computers was so slow that every two years it was worth the upgrade, but now you can do basically anything on any computer. Only if you are a professional that needs power for a specific software, like 3d rendering, only then you might get a value from an upgrade. I like how companies tries to brainwash you that their new product is 10% faster, even though practically it makes no difference. No one should care if you can render your 20 minutes video 2 minutes faster. No one sits and looks and the screen while it's rendering something. tldr; don't be a brainless sheep and think about what you actually need and not about what you want and you will realize that the nice things are all around you.
@ileanaprofeanu7626
@ileanaprofeanu7626 2 роки тому
Same happened to me haha
@cookiecrumbler2345
@cookiecrumbler2345 2 роки тому
@@codehardr1209 i understand that but you get what i was saying
@ylstorage7085
@ylstorage7085 2 роки тому
"Blame China! ...yep, that should do it"
@zenokarlsbach4292
@zenokarlsbach4292 2 роки тому
@im300kmh but today's light bulbs are pretty resistent.
@MrElectricSkittles
@MrElectricSkittles 5 днів тому
We're no longer wild animals where every day is a fight to survive, but we sure have made a great attempt at making it as depressing and sinister a reality as possible
@user-qz3oi9qc2j
@user-qz3oi9qc2j 3 місяці тому
Planned obsolescence is quite depressing, but always good to keep in mind. Thanks a lot for this video !
@0ned
@0ned 3 роки тому
Planned obsolescence joke A woman wrote to a refrigerator manufacturer, thanking them for a fridge that had lasted twenty years without fail. The company offered to send one of their design engineers to inspect it and the lady agreed. When he got there, she asked, "you want to make sure all your products are made to this higher standard?" He said, "No! They want me to make sure we never make one that lasts this long ever again, or else no one would ever need buy a new one!" That was an old joke when I heard it forty years ago!
@Facistznik
@Facistznik 3 роки тому
This joke is too resilient and is cutting into joke manufacturers' profits. They should make jokes with more dated references and slang that make them age worse.
@Patrick-zr8tv
@Patrick-zr8tv 3 роки тому
@@Facistznik brilliant. Now comedians will make billions.
@GetFunnied
@GetFunnied 3 роки тому
you just wanted to say you were born in 1935
@KalRandom
@KalRandom 3 роки тому
My grandmother has a GE frige that still works fine, that's over 50 years old.
@fmaz1952
@fmaz1952 3 роки тому
Can we stop pretending VPN services are "more secure"? Rare are the websites that are not encrypted with TLS certificates. Encrypting it again is not meaningfully more secure. VPN hides your IP and makes you harder to track. That great to circunvent geo locked content and reduce geo targeted content, but has little to do with your security. If anything if makes it harder for your online banking plateform from recognizing your regular connexion pattern, which I would argue makes your ban account LESS secure to use if you connect to it using a VPN.
@DESTRUCTIONKATCHUP
@DESTRUCTIONKATCHUP 3 роки тому
The phrase “They don’t make’m like they used to” exists for a reason.
@johnysmrz
@johnysmrz 3 роки тому
And that reason is selective memory bias. People simply tend to remember good things.
@NotMe-ej9yz
@NotMe-ej9yz 3 роки тому
@@johnysmrz there can be many reasons/causes for a single event, you're both right
@YusuffYT
@YusuffYT 3 роки тому
@@johnysmrz that's why we write and record history, because our minds will forget most bad things
@electronresonator8882
@electronresonator8882 3 роки тому
why should they? they want more money and people want more jobs
@YusuffYT
@YusuffYT 3 роки тому
@ᴄᴏᴠᴏɪᴅ • Actually, it is related to the topic, we tend to remember the good things from our past but forget about the bad ones (being the good things in this case, more durable products)
@stevensrocks798
@stevensrocks798 8 місяців тому
We mostly have bayonet fittings on our light fixtures in the UK, we do use screw bulbs but they're not the standard.
@theresaivy7045
@theresaivy7045 3 місяці тому
I love history and origins, pretty much the beginning of things and why. I knew nothing about your channel except that the title, This Is Why We Can't Have Nice Things, was clever. Actual Conspiracies didn't sway me, not because I don't believe in conspiracies but I didn't know if it were true or just the rantings of a nutter. I clicked and I'm glad I did. I also subscribed because you backed up all your arguments with real facts. Good video.
@broli123
@broli123 3 роки тому
Shout out to Louis Rossmann and his efforts towards right to repair.
@jcornscorndog941
@jcornscorndog941 3 роки тому
Yes
@Absquatulationist
@Absquatulationist 3 роки тому
Indeed
@marcasking5786
@marcasking5786 3 роки тому
Hell yeah
@giancarlomartini2133
@giancarlomartini2133 3 роки тому
For sure!
@hacademicabel
@hacademicabel 3 роки тому
Amen to that.
@doubleoof7907
@doubleoof7907 3 роки тому
“Is curing patients a sustainable business model?” -Actual quote from Goldman Sachs
@derrickcox4233
@derrickcox4233 3 роки тому
Creepy
@doubleoof7907
@doubleoof7907 3 роки тому
@Yash Singh Can’t tell if you’re kidding or not, but those are both horrible ideas
@calamitychaela1994
@calamitychaela1994 3 роки тому
@@doubleoof7907 That's a double oof
@paullayfield
@paullayfield 3 роки тому
Not only that, they have commercials for medication saying ask your doctor about this. I think that's just weird. That stuff should be communicated between drug manufacturers and doctors & then maybe explained to you as an option. Also the ads that give a list of symptoms which are common feelings that everyone experiences but they make it seem like you have a problem & should be on medication for it. Sometimes it's a legit thing but a lot of it seems like modern day snake oil peddlers.
@althepsyphros3314
@althepsyphros3314 3 роки тому
@Yash Singh But MUH Ur just a conspiracy theorist with your homeopathy and essential oils! /S JK.
@jebgoldcorn
@jebgoldcorn Місяць тому
Great video! A great follow up would be companies who have grown beyond integrated obsolescence and rent out products as services (like the carpet tile company Interface). The old way of designing products for landfill needs to be over. Can we get some examples of circular economy businesses? Congratulations on your excellent work on this channel!
@camdenfurry5187
@camdenfurry5187 3 місяці тому
This has been popping up in my recommended for 2 years and they finally got me. I guess i have to watch it now
@badwolf4239
@badwolf4239 3 роки тому
Slightly different than obsolescence, but when I was 13 or so, my neighbor (who lived about a mile away since I grew up on a farm) hired me to help him cut and load some old, dead oak trees to sell the wood. For those who don't know, wood is usually sold by the cord when dealing with large sales, which is a measure of volume (around 1,000 gallons, I think). So I started loading this wood into a trailer, and on the second day I was helping him, he stopped me and told me that I was loading it too well. I was being too efficient, packing the wood into the trailer too tightly and thus reducing his profit from the sale of the wood, since there was more wood per cord. He made me stop and instead load it loosely and less efficiently. A few days after that, I came up with a way to use his tractor to load the wood faster than either of us could by hand, and he fired me once he realized how well it worked. Really taught me a lot about the world.
@nelsblair2667
@nelsblair2667 3 роки тому
I don’t blame him for releasing unneeded laborers. I might blame him for shorting the customer. I don’t blame him, if he had just wanted you manual load times to be faster but used the packing efficiency argument to show his concern, without directly calling you slow.
@danieljensen2626
@danieljensen2626 3 роки тому
I mean you kinda did that to yourself if he was paying you to help and you showed him he could just use the tractor without needing you at all.
@ikocheratcr
@ikocheratcr 3 роки тому
You optimized yourself out. Welcome to the world. Happens when you automate your job too much, your employer finds that you are not needed any more, sadly that employer is short sighted, cause he can use you to automate more stuff instead.
@SeldomPooper
@SeldomPooper 3 роки тому
ha :D
@Anarchy421
@Anarchy421 3 роки тому
Never seen wood measured in gallons. Thanks for the laugh :D
@ConnoisseurOfExistence
@ConnoisseurOfExistence 3 роки тому
Imagine the waste of resources, human labor and damage to the environment, that the planned obsolescence have costed the world... For all the products that this tactics have been used combined, we're probably talking about many millions of human lives wasted to sustain this system, let alone the resources and the environment...
@constantineas2523
@constantineas2523 3 роки тому
So true my friend ....this is very bad for the enviroment.
@HungryTacoBoy
@HungryTacoBoy 3 роки тому
I saw your thumbnail and thought, "Wait, I commented on this video already?" Nice pic!
@wilurbean
@wilurbean 3 роки тому
The alternative system, maybe not planned obsolescence, but probably. Greed pervades all systems. But in our system, the cartel broke up after about a decade. In the other system, the gov and cartel are the same thing by design.
@Puzzlesocks
@Puzzlesocks 3 роки тому
The question then leads to "what to do with all the people who aren't working?" I recommend looking into the Rat Utopia experiment. It shows that when animals no longer have to worry about life, they end up with all sorts of horrible issues. I despise planned obsolescence as much as anyone, but people without work is potentially a worse issue to have. I don't know the correct answer. I don't think anyone does. I personally feel that we just have too many people, and that have an addiction to progress. It could very well be that we are playing out the story of Icarus, and we won't know we are metaphorically flying too high until our wings melt and we fall to earth.
@ddegn
@ddegn 3 роки тому
@@Puzzlesocks "I personally feel that we just have too many people" Except lots of people make economy of scale possible. Smartphones would be prohibitively expensive if the population of the world were significantly reduced. Anyway, I liked your reply and I also don't know the correct answer.
@JavierBonillaC
@JavierBonillaC 3 місяці тому
This is probably tne best video I've seen ever since UKposts was created.
@urmumscow3206
@urmumscow3206 3 місяці тому
watch technology connections video on the same topic buster. he doesn't mention the fact the bulb in the firehouse isn't even a functioning light, yeah its got a warm glow but good luck even seeing your dick if that was the only light source you had in your house
@takeoffwithmeburner
@takeoffwithmeburner 2 місяці тому
this is one of my favorite videos of all time. not one of my favorite veritasium videos but one of my favorite videos ever.
@ericfox359
@ericfox359 2 роки тому
Not naming their conspiracy the "Illuminati" seems like a missed opportunity.
@kozmosis3486
@kozmosis3486 2 роки тому
Someone already called dibs on that one
@mick9392
@mick9392 2 роки тому
Did you want them to get sued!!!!!
@MLATX512
@MLATX512 2 роки тому
I think that was their internal name for the project.
@bosssnurp5912
@bosssnurp5912 2 роки тому
I hate how smart this comment is
@dire_prism
@dire_prism 2 роки тому
Already in use by the mother conspiracy
@richiemandina5305
@richiemandina5305 2 роки тому
When I first started learning/working as a mechanic I asked my boss, after getting very frustrated trying to remove rusted brake lines, why the car manufacturers wouldn't just use metals that were stronger and wouldn't rust and corrode so easily. He goes " do you like having a job?" And even knowing he had a point, it still really annoyed me that things are basically designed to fail. especially when you consider how ridiculously expensive cars are nowadays. If I'm spending 30, 40 or 50 grand on something.....it should damn well be built to last me the rest of my life.
@johnpresler7537
@johnpresler7537 2 роки тому
you would be damn well lucky if it outlasts the payments
@richiemandina5305
@richiemandina5305 2 роки тому
@@johnpresler7537 so sad, isn't it?
@wesrogers7630
@wesrogers7630 2 роки тому
@@richiemandina5305 actually it isn't. It is the way our world works for now. I do agree it should be changed, but it can't be changed overnight. Plus as stated earlier, the cost of the upgrade would be extremely high. This needs to be addressed and slowly upgraded. Imagine if we went to self driving semi's by next year. Over 3 million would be out of work with no real skill set to switch to another job bringing in the same income. But of course, we can't even talk about it because it means your either a leftist or a rightist. Then the name calling starts and boom, nothing gets talked about. Capitalism did bring more people out of extreme poverty than any other system previous to it, but it's time is coming to and end. It has been distorted and manipulated to serve the few. It was the first system that allowed almost anyone to climb the social ladder to wealth. Yes much harder for some, but still happened. Here is the problem as I see it. You can't have equality of outcome. People won't stand for it, and others will take advantage of it. Maybe a universal income with basic needs met to live a meager life, but health and physical needs are met. Who knows.
@richiemandina5305
@richiemandina5305 2 роки тому
@@wesrogers7630 Yes capitalism does have it's flaws. But I disagree that it's time has come to an end. What I think would be ideal is somehow (nearly impossible, I know) establishing a government that doesn't allow the corruption of politicians helping out their buddies in big business, a system that ACTUALLY keeps things fair. And no, you won't ever have equality of outcome because it isn't possible, unless at some point in the future everyone that is born is cloned to be an exact replica of everyone else. Some people are more ambitious, some people are far more superior or inferior in athletic ability, some people would rather just sit around and have society support them. It'll never be perfect for everyone. I think the best you can plan to achieve is equal opportunity. If we can get that right I think civilization can be a beautiful thing, generally speaking. But I think it's pretty obvious, based on history, that anybody in a position of power claiming they're going to make it all better via outcome equality is only trying to increase their own wealth and power at the expense of our wealth and freedom.
@evanvokes1694
@evanvokes1694 2 роки тому
not to worry, he is so wrong but people love to hear it. The LED he used as an example has its life not limited by the germanium LED but by the electrolytic capacitor and some are terrible. For his light example, you would have to wire your house for constant voltage 5V DC to get a longer life and that would be determined by the operation amplifier component but what builder would ever installs such a system
@SnehaBag
@SnehaBag 8 місяців тому
Pretty knowledgeable and significant video it is! Thank you Veritasium 💜❤️
@stingray8934
@stingray8934 3 дні тому
Phoebus Cartel has to be like the coolest name
@candiceassell2063
@candiceassell2063 2 роки тому
The person who thought the never-ending lightbulb would put them out of business obviously didn’t have children who break things...
@KStone22
@KStone22 2 роки тому
Yeah, as soon as we moved into our new house my little sister broke a light bulb.
@nmb-u-
@nmb-u- 2 роки тому
sales were down by almost 50% in 2 years.. in 4 the number may have fallen way more, people would lose their jobs, cuz they need to make less lightbulbs, and if lights didn't got any more expensive, then yeah, they might have to file bankruptcy ; -;)
@nmb-u-
@nmb-u- 2 роки тому
​@@KStone22 but the problem is, she would always break the light, but the new light would last 1000 hours and had to be replaced, and that is way faster than how many times she would break a bulb
@randompensamientos9802
@randompensamientos9802 2 роки тому
Kevin, watch the light! Kevin! Kevin, watch the light dude! *crash*
@SetOfAllSets
@SetOfAllSets 2 роки тому
@@nmb-u- what if it was during the time after ww2 when the population boomed
@EyMannMachHin
@EyMannMachHin 3 роки тому
“Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months.” ― Oscar Wilde
@blerst7066
@blerst7066 3 роки тому
More like every six days lol
@anzutheweeb9052
@anzutheweeb9052 3 роки тому
That is genius. Which is why they had nothing to fear of the ever lasting fiber he would not be able to wear that suit past labor day.
@jgbandbjb92709
@jgbandbjb92709 3 роки тому
He forgot to add, and poison the world with it's refuse.
@mauricecornforth1233
@mauricecornforth1233 3 роки тому
fashion is a way to make you buy products you don't need
@Morsaljaanii
@Morsaljaanii 3 роки тому
@Questa Semplice Animazione 😂😂😂😂😂😭😭😭😭
@jzibell1
@jzibell1 Місяць тому
Fantastic video. Thanks. I wish you spent some time on the environmental and sustainability impacts of planned obsolescence.
@koolway
@koolway 3 місяці тому
I have 9 LED bulbs on my kitchen ceiling that I replaced with LED when I moved in few years ago. Roughly every 2-3 years (according to amazon order date), they all die almost simultaniously (or get really dimmed) one after the other and have to replace them all. On the box they're rated for 1500 On-Off cycles.... on-off ~2 times a day, ~700 cycles per year... If there's no counter within the bulb, that's pretty impressive to be that accurate !
@miketrissel5494
@miketrissel5494 2 місяці тому
They did the same to LED bulbs as they did to incandescent in 2015, if you got an early one, it' still works, after that, they put a component in it as a countdown timer. - Sorry. You can still make your own though ... Open it up, and replace it with an LED and a resistor, but be quick - it will be part of the LED's soon, if not already
@Belgrythaz
@Belgrythaz 3 роки тому
It is actually outrageous that planned obsolescence isn't discussed more. It is definitely one of the main issues we need to solve in order to save our planet.
@umbium
@umbium 3 роки тому
Good luck trying to change the wealthy 1% minds. I bet we will head towards "pay your climatic survival tools" instead of "stop climate change". Unless everyone stops asking their neighbours to do stupid behavipural changes and star demanding the governments and companies
@Ben-rz9cf
@Ben-rz9cf 3 роки тому
And they also worked out its actually a select few criminal groups even in the world that are responsible for like 90% of the worlds spam emails so if we just got interpol to crack down on them once and for all we could end both a nuisance that has plagued the world since the internet began and also take a chunk out of the global carbon footprint
@asafoster7954
@asafoster7954 3 роки тому
@@umbium eat the rich ?
@TeKaMOTO
@TeKaMOTO 3 роки тому
In George Carlin's words, "The planet is fine, the _people_ are fucked!"
@Guessagainkk
@Guessagainkk 3 роки тому
We are living a capitalistic world
@mjklein
@mjklein 2 роки тому
At recording studio where I worked in my 30s, the chief engineer who was in his 60s told me that when he was a kid, his mother told him never throw away a burned out light bulb. When asked why, he said his mother told him they could take it back to Edison and get a replacement one for free. They were never supposed to burn out and a burned out light bulb was considered defective.
@ASP42069
@ASP42069 2 роки тому
That’s awesome!
@tedcole9936
@tedcole9936 2 роки тому
That’s quite interesting. When I was a kid, in the late 1950’s and early 1960’s I remember that indeed we could take burnt out light bulbs back to “Edison” for free replacement, too. In my case, “Edison” meant the Detroit Edison Company… which was the electricity utility company. However, I was told a different reason… that since Edison was selling the electricity to you, giving out free light bulbs encouraged people to install more lights, I.e. more Kilowatts used per customer. My grandfather was an engineer at Detroit Edison, but unfortunately I don’t know if that rationale came from him or if it was just something my parents surmised.. but it definitely was true, I remember where the local Edison office was in our town, and I remember taking bulbs there for free replacements.
@terrywilder9
@terrywilder9 2 роки тому
In Michigan Detroit Edison had a policy where you could save your burnt out lightbulbs and return them for free replacement. At one point to due to legal rangling they had to move the place where you returned them out of state to Toledo Ohio. It was in the interest of the Utilities that the light bulbs lasted as long as possible and they required the bulb manufacturers, GE, Westinghouse, Sylvania and Phillip's to meet higher standards and supply them with bulbs that lasted longer. Then a party store owner sued Detroit Edison to stop this practice alleging that it was effecting his lightbulb sales. There was an out roar towards this party store owner, who later admitted a lawyer put him up to suing! Btw I still have many of these replacement bulbs. They last 5 to 10 years as compared to 10 to 24 months!
@FigmentSALabel
@FigmentSALabel 2 роки тому
@@tedcole9936 Good story.
@hney421
@hney421 2 роки тому
Wow! Thats awesome
@bronwentillman8385
@bronwentillman8385 22 години тому
I've had the incandescent light bulbs last so much longer than the LED bulbs. I've lived in my current home almost 2 years now, and I'm still using light bulbs I had 2 homes ago in the early 2010s!
@gedstrom
@gedstrom 8 місяців тому
Talking about trying to get people to buy newer cars as often as possible: Back in 2012, I bought a used 2005 Honda CR-V and I am still driving it today at about 208,000 miles and 18 years old and I intend to keep on driving it until it becomes uneconomical to repair. I feel absolutely no pressure to have the latest and greatest!
@abnermascarenhas3615
@abnermascarenhas3615 3 роки тому
The worst part of planned obsolescence is that it affects the environment negatively ....waste produced by us would be far less if it wasn't for this stupid money making strategy
@vlr7368
@vlr7368 3 роки тому
Exactly, this.
@Ktulu789
@Ktulu789 3 роки тому
Interestingly, newer products are marketed as "more efficient" also.
@maasbekooy901
@maasbekooy901 3 роки тому
I really hope more people are gonna see this trough. I think it's really unhealthy to consume so much. Especially with cloths but also with electronics and all kind of other stuff. I never knew but apparently there are people out there who even buy new cutlery and plates every season to "stay in fashion"
@kattenelvis1778
@kattenelvis1778 3 роки тому
Exactly! If it wasn't for capitalism and planned obsolecence we could live sustainably.
@jphzazueta
@jphzazueta 3 роки тому
I know. That's the first thing that comes to my mind.
@SneakySolidSnake
@SneakySolidSnake 2 роки тому
people thought: "in a hundred years, we'll have flying cars." what really happens in a hundred years is, "we'll focus on making tires break in a safe way."
@LawsOnJoystick
@LawsOnJoystick 2 роки тому
Flying cars are helicopters
@sannewijn8695
@sannewijn8695 2 роки тому
Wouldnt it be weird if your flying car would suddenly fall out the sky because it reached 18 months?
@LawsOnJoystick
@LawsOnJoystick 2 роки тому
@@sannewijn8695 maintenance
@OnyxIdol
@OnyxIdol 2 роки тому
@@LawsOnJoystick wooosh
@gomahklawm4446
@gomahklawm4446 2 роки тому
Capitalism.....money over people every single time...
@andreaf.6955
@andreaf.6955 7 місяців тому
Hands down one of the most informative videos ever! Thank you
@cheeseisgreat24
@cheeseisgreat24 4 місяці тому
TBH several years after this video I feel like it’s always worth coming back to. We as a society need to figure out a way to design and build things which not only last for as long as possible, but also to make companies who dedicate themselves to making these products sustainable. I think one of the biggest things is stopping the requirement of the pursuit of infinite growth by shareholders.
@FrostedCreations
@FrostedCreations 3 місяці тому
Capitalism is just fundamentally incompatible with responsible use of resources, because it pursues short term goals. I don't think capitalism is all bad but as a society we need accept that we can't have our cake and eat it.
@anonymouscausethatshowirol828
@anonymouscausethatshowirol828 Рік тому
All of this neglects one of the worst parts of planned obsolescence: the overwhelming waste. We don’t have infinite resources, and even when we recycle the old models and items, we still produce emissions and non-recyclable components. Planned obsolescence only further exaggerates resource depletion and pollution
@cringe5393
@cringe5393 Рік тому
thas just how boomers do it back in the day
@k-ozdragon
@k-ozdragon Рік тому
@@cringe5393 Most items built in the boomer generation were built to last. Consumers of that era bought items they thought would last a lifetime, & almost always repaired them rather than replace them. Large scale consumerism really began in the 80s, & rapidly accelerated into the modern era. You could hardly get a boomer to buy something they would replace the very next year. However, Gen X, millennials, & Gen Z all look forward to replacing still new items with even newer versions. Owning the latest & greatest thing became the new goal, rather than actual usefulness. Even the thought that an item would be "collectible" didn't begin until the late 80s. It's why stuff from the 80s onward isn't worth hardly anything, while items from the 40s had value as antiques during the 80s. People back then didn't "collect" things, they actually used them.
@This_is_my_spout
@This_is_my_spout Рік тому
@@k-ozdragon Did you not watch the video?
@k-ozdragon
@k-ozdragon Рік тому
@@This_is_my_spout I did. So lightbulbs were made to be less effective, which ended in the 30s. When did ipod & most consumer goods begin to widely make their stuff so it couldn't be repaired? Did people in the era from 1900-1985 buy things just because they were collectible?
@k-ozdragon
@k-ozdragon Рік тому
@@tobytoxd People didn't sell their cars just to buy a new model because the color changed. Not like consumers today would buy a the same exact phone that they already own because the "newer" one is pink. Automotive paint just gained a competitive edge over the other makers to sell more cars. Henry Ford painted cars black because it was the only paint at the time that didn't change color over time & dried quickly. Car makers literally painted cars with paint made from fish scale pigment. Something the average person couldn't afford. It has zero to do with planned obsolescence. As far as fashion goes, when has that ever not changed? Clothing always evolved since it was invented. The only difference is more people can afford clothing. Find an era in history where those who could afford clothing weren't looking for something new & unique to wear. Good luck. Both of these things are market forces involved in every purchase ever made in history by consumers. If GM made a car that would break on purpose, & was constructed so the consumer couldn't repair it, you might have a point. The light bulb is a glaring example of that. However, the practice of replacing things that don't need replacing, buying purely to say that you own the latest version, or designing things with the intention of them breaking, is a far more modern phenomenon.
@Alex-tx7ih
@Alex-tx7ih 3 роки тому
Planned obsolescence is one of the most infuriating things in modern day products.
@RialuCaos
@RialuCaos 3 роки тому
Just one symptom of an underlying broken economic system.
@TheHumanSystem
@TheHumanSystem 3 роки тому
This is why we support products that are not proprietary in nature. (like apple) That helps, but does not fully solve the issue, of course.
@nosferatu5
@nosferatu5 3 роки тому
And then Apple claims to be eco-friendly, while lobbying to prevent their devices from being repaired, or designing their devices to brick on component swaps. Disgusting.
@IdgaradLyracant
@IdgaradLyracant 3 роки тому
Carbon and End of Life Disposal tax would put a dent in that ideology.
@lunchie80
@lunchie80 3 роки тому
@@TheHumanSystem android isn't much better. Operating systems continually advance. Old phones can't run latest Android or apps. Apple suck for sure but don't kid yourself that it isn't happening elsewhere. Look up Sonos and their bricking of gen 1 speakers on purpose...
@jamiibear
@jamiibear Місяць тому
I love the hints of hopefullness in the video! Reminds us that things can and are getting better.
@atharvagunde832
@atharvagunde832 7 місяців тому
15:00, my man literally called it!
@jonathanbates9928
@jonathanbates9928 7 місяців тому
Was just going to say this lol.
@amoltandon2900
@amoltandon2900 3 роки тому
"There was a secret meeting between the world's top executives from the world's leading lightbulb companies" Never thought I'd hear that sentence is my life.
@scarlace
@scarlace 3 роки тому
Yeah similar story with the sugar cane industry. And they managed to get weed illegal up to this point because of their scheming
@uncannyvalley2350
@uncannyvalley2350 3 роки тому
Now imagine what the oil, beef, and defence contractors get up to
@uncannyvalley2350
@uncannyvalley2350 3 роки тому
@@scarlace weed was banned in large part to enforce apartheid, but also to protect the petrochemical industry, as hemp can reproduce the lions share of their products
@abointedtoyblingofmats
@abointedtoyblingofmats 3 роки тому
@@uncannyvalley2350 agriculture gets more than all of those, grains and cheap crops has always, and will always be slave food
@dr.vivekbindra5906
@dr.vivekbindra5906 3 роки тому
W H a t s a p p +1 6 8 9 2 0 2 8 1 9 7
@drakenbakken
@drakenbakken 3 роки тому
Lets not talk about how most of these LED bulb are overclocked on purpose to die when they physically should last forever
@EddSjo
@EddSjo 3 роки тому
This is fixalbe if you have some electric know-how as a consumer, but the point still stands. Also, it's not just "overclocked on purpose to die", but more like small leds are cheaper, and people want bright bulbs, so the industry pushes small leds for small the small profit compared to larger, more suitable leds for the given output.
@Vetospeedo
@Vetospeedo 3 роки тому
Company sells light bulbs that never go out = more money in the short run, and will probably ruin a industry. Company sells light bulbs that go out after a year= more money in the long run, and more jobs for people. It's really just about money for these businesses. Apple probably is 20 years ahead of what they put out.
@sedme0
@sedme0 3 роки тому
Well, no, it's not clocked at all. It's that they run at too high a current.
@gregfaris6959
@gregfaris6959 3 роки тому
@@sedme0 Both statements can be correct when we're discussing % duty cycles in Pulse Width Modulation
@sycc66
@sycc66 3 роки тому
@@gregfaris6959 No, because then the clock is still the same. Overclocked means increased frequency, not increased duty cycle.
@winespringinc.9447
@winespringinc.9447 3 місяці тому
Same thing with glass. In the GDR a basicly unbreakble glass was invented (with the unfortunate name chemical enforced glass) but production was discontinued in the 90s.
@soBored13
@soBored13 3 місяці тому
He summoned a fandom with that one 😂
@viridianloom
@viridianloom 3 роки тому
It seems like planned obsolescence also snuffs out innovation. Like, we could be reaching the end of the road on certain technologies and ask "ok, what's next?" But instead we're keeping ourselves in limbo.
@anonwithamnesia
@anonwithamnesia 3 роки тому
Exactly what’s happening with cars, homes, machinery. Just because of JoBs
@Gener1KGaming
@Gener1KGaming 3 роки тому
You've just described the entire oil industry
@romansenger2322
@romansenger2322 3 роки тому
Thats because most people dont want to adapt and change themselves. They will vote against change. Literally happening right now with the transistion to EVs.
@stockloc
@stockloc 3 роки тому
@@romansenger2322 In many ways, I feel as though EV's aren't going to really improve anything in terms of how much resources we're using up. I feel like we need to figure out how to live our lives without having to need cars. Japan does this well.
@romansenger2322
@romansenger2322 3 роки тому
@@stockloc of course they do. Just look up "EV vs ICE what pollutes more" here on youtube to get an idea how bad ICEs are. But I get your point. Mobility will never be good for the environment. Its always about the question how to make it less damaging for the environment.
@dylanvellut
@dylanvellut 3 роки тому
I studied chemistry to change the world and make it better, safer, more efficient. Now I realise I can’t change economic dynamics
@oldtimetinfoilhatwearer
@oldtimetinfoilhatwearer 3 роки тому
Use your knowledge to bomb power stations
@smk77097
@smk77097 3 роки тому
Start your own company
@nicklatino7157
@nicklatino7157 3 роки тому
Should get some education in economics
@zainiikhwan9405
@zainiikhwan9405 3 роки тому
Capitalism ho!
@irjonesy
@irjonesy 3 роки тому
Go to Mars and start over. We need to welcome in the new age of building systems that ensure the scientists and engineers win. The business and finance people got us where we are today. The scientists and engineers will bring us to the future.
@BertrandDunogier
@BertrandDunogier 25 днів тому
This change from Ford's original vision was really catastrophic in retrospect. The general idea that we all deserve to have (be ?) unique things is everywhere and dictates how we consume. Good video, as very often. One thing that would have been worth mentioning about LED: while they are indeed a great technological improvement a) they are far more complex than incandescent lights, and did change an electrical device to an electronical one, that requires more material and is harder to recycle and b) yes, we seldom have to change our light bulbs, but we tend to use waaaaay more of them. Smart, modular LED panels, LED strips, small LEDs in toys, on the back of TVs, etc... the rebound effect strikes again.
@koketsojunior6685
@koketsojunior6685 8 місяців тому
I’m study accounting and I see these businesses differently now 😭😭😭
@kevnar
@kevnar 2 роки тому
"A secret meeting of top executives..." Nothing good ever comes out of secret meetings of top executives of any industry.
@cessposter
@cessposter 2 роки тому
usb (although I believe in serial port superiority)
@vorpal22
@vorpal22 2 роки тому
That's because the people most likely to become successful top executives have sociopathy / psychopathy. You usually don't get rich by being generous and virtuous.
@eltwarg6388
@eltwarg6388 2 роки тому
@@vorpal22 ... or just an average person.
@saxxy4306
@saxxy4306 2 роки тому
@@vorpal22 i think like you. thats a solid point
@vorpal22
@vorpal22 2 роки тому
@@eltwarg6388 Studies have shown that people with sociopathy are more likely to be successful in business, or be complete failures in life, while people without this personality disorder are less likely to be successful businesspeople. Certainly that doesn't imply that every CEO is a psychopath, but a disproportionate number of CEOs are psychopaths.
@h7opolo
@h7opolo 3 роки тому
this explains the common phrase, "they don't make 'em like they used to."
@Petaurista13
@Petaurista13 3 роки тому
also" we make myths about them. Man things wasn't really so good quality, many other was more durable as they were more complex (so not much to break) or people weren't sing them so much and actually main reason for lower quality is mass-production. Simply if you want to mass product cheap stuff it has to be made cheap. There is saying in my country "tanio kupujesz - dwa razy kupujesz" (literally: "You buy cheap - you buy twice")
@nathanberrigan9839
@nathanberrigan9839 3 роки тому
Survivorship Bias is the main thing responsible for that phrase.
@COPKALA
@COPKALA 3 роки тому
This is sentence false, a washing machine, for example, does NOT break up now in a shorter time than 20 or 40 years ago. There are tests that independent laboratories have performed on the subject. What is true is that: repair in not as cheap as it used to be, there are less independent repair shops around. It is much less easy to repair things. At the same time new items are more efficient (less energy, less water, less detergent, clothes come out with less wrinkles) and there is a trade off that people needs to balance.
@ShynRou
@ShynRou 3 роки тому
@@nathanberrigan9839 Sure but especially in electronics, it was standard to build things with screws and to publish full schematics so you or an independent technician can repair it.
@TheHumanSystem
@TheHumanSystem 3 роки тому
Humans are interesting. It is mostly the fault of the companies, but the individual humans do not help by always craving the latest and greatest version.
@FredoCorleone
@FredoCorleone 3 місяці тому
Formally electronics engineer here, worked on redox probes in pools treatment industry and I tell you we designed those probes to last just as much before replacement (few months). The CEO explicitly told me it was to make profit.
@FinnTheHumen
@FinnTheHumen 2 місяці тому
It’s a very interesting problem, is growing a company a bad thing, what happens if we make things last forever, will you be able to pay for your next meal or pay for the roof over your head? I believe greed is fundamentally wired into us. It’s such a hot topic and I can’t even begin to think how we can combat it because at the end of the day everyone wants to be successful and wants to build up their company and who has the right to tell them that they should run there company into the ground because it’s morally right when they worked there ass off to get there. Who knows maybe where looking at this in the wrong way. I have no data on this and it’s purely my opinion.
@MrMikeHawkey
@MrMikeHawkey 8 місяців тому
Great video, but it didn't even touch on the planned obsolescence of printers. Microsoft (and Apple) only have to bring out a new OS and because printer manufacturers have no gain in updating their drivers, you end up having to throw out a perfectly good printer. Same goes for other peripherals, but to a lesser extent.
@1234567895182
@1234567895182 3 роки тому
How are we meant to reduce waste and move forward if so many companies models are literally, "let's make this stuff turn into garbage as quick as possible"
@Nina9Robes
@Nina9Robes 3 роки тому
The other end to this is the fact that a lot of these companies will offer discounts on purchases of new products in exchange for the old items. They make a sale at a small loss for the discount, but in return they get the old items from you that they can reuse and repurpose. Our resources are finite.. this is the only way that I could see one justifying planned obsolescence. I still don't like it tho. 😒
@alwaystired1
@alwaystired1 3 роки тому
youre dead on, pollution is primarily an issues with mega corps, not your average person. but they're great at shifting the blame onto straws ffs
@Miranox2
@Miranox2 3 роки тому
It will not happen until they are *forced* to change, either by us or by the environment.
@Miranox2
@Miranox2 3 роки тому
@@alwaystired1 This is why public recycling is a sham. Over 90% of what you put in recycling ends up in a garbage dump anyway, but you are asked to recycle so that blame is shifted away from corporations.
@esdev92
@esdev92 3 роки тому
"Quality over quantity, just make sure there's not too much quality, else there will be no quantity."
@testacals
@testacals 3 роки тому
@@anonwithamnesia Let say you made a ever lasting phone . You can only sell what 7 billion after that you have to move on
@moving.quotes
@moving.quotes 3 роки тому
I think the solution is to "embrace the change". Train the people to not just get stuck in one job but rotate their jobs. This way if we have reached pinnacle of light bulb we can use the workforce for some other challenge. Skill set of individual should free them not trap them in a job. The software industry has embraced this. People in IT keep learning throughout their career. If they don't learn they get irrelevant. The learning pace is cut throat as well. Learning is good for individuals! It basically gives the individual the confidence to stand in the face of change.
@marzipancutter8144
@marzipancutter8144 3 роки тому
@@testacals Oh woe is me, after getting stupid rich off of a single invention now I might have to use my genius-level intellect capable of creating an everlasting phone for some other productive thing, rather than sitting on that single achievement for the rest of my life and three generations of my heirs doing the same.
@ozanmrcan
@ozanmrcan 3 роки тому
@@marzipancutter8144 that might be the reason why you are not a businessman
@Mikelica69
@Mikelica69 3 роки тому
@@moving.quotes THIS
@jaykinbacon2379
@jaykinbacon2379 6 місяців тому
Thank you Veritasium to remind us we don't have to replace a monitor's pixel every 1000 hours...
@paulgaddis4329
@paulgaddis4329 2 місяці тому
Du Pont played the same move with refrigerant patents expiring. R-12, then R-22, and now R410a has issues.
@Aaron.Thomas
@Aaron.Thomas 2 роки тому
V: "Known as planned obsolescence" Me: "Sounds like Apple" V: "Let's talk about Apple now".
@JohnSmith-pn2vl
@JohnSmith-pn2vl 2 роки тому
he has false claims about apple, the battery is replacable, iphones are the longest lasting and longest kept phones, also the most replaced Batteries goes to the iphone, on top of that, every other manufacturer does all the mentioned things in a way more drastic fashion. because Androids phones are just thrown away and bought new, while an apple products last at least 10 years, and even then you can sell it within a day without any problems, thats called value. also, the right to repair movement is wannabe dream nonsense, especially if we are talking about Apple, the efficiency of that Product is so high and produced in such big numbers, repairing it, could never ever compete with a replacement product in eviromental terms. its far better the apple way. look at the Fairphone, which wants to be the uber repair phone, its trash in every way, causes way more co2 and waste, on top of that its a terrible product with terrible stats, bulky unsafe and extremely expensive. its bad at everything. the creator is just the typical Apple hater that has no idea what he is talking about.
@baoquoc3710
@baoquoc3710 2 роки тому
@@JohnSmith-pn2vl you apple fan just underestimated the power of community, citing everyone hates apple whereas heinous practices have been even brought into courts and trials! If you can't make these clear, don't try to embarass yourself by these baseless defensive claims
@baoquoc3710
@baoquoc3710 2 роки тому
@@JohnSmith-pn2vl also android is the reason apple has to release an iphone se 2 with pretty much the iphone 8 with a new cpu, but the battery is just going to age the worst. If you try to say android exists to be thrown out, you have dilligence problem here mate
@JohnSmith-pn2vl
@JohnSmith-pn2vl 2 роки тому
@tutacat if you could replace it yourself, most phones would be damaged and not worth any battery replacement at that time which is at least 5 years in the worst case. people are not supposed to "repair" their phones, thats just nonsense and has the contrary effect. you can replace any iPhone battery within minutes in any city in the world. yes apple replaces your battery, of course, lol you know iphone battery replacement is actually a thing, a market in itself. android not because its trash that wont last 10 years easily like every apple product. also it simply wont keep its value like every apple product thus not worth any repair or battery replacement, ppl just buy a new one, there is always something thats broken after 2-3 years in an android device. see, you dont know the very, very basic stuff about apple, dont try to teach ppl about it then.... my iPhone 4 is 12 years old and still on its first battery, using it every day.
@JohnSmith-pn2vl
@JohnSmith-pn2vl 2 роки тому
@@baoquoc3710 rofl are you serious? the SE 2 wqith its a13 is faster than any android Device in the world in the very cheapest iPhone available. android has nothing to do with the SE lol. wow your logic is really just some random thrown together nonsense. they could put an a11 in it and it would be perfectly fine. no iphone battery dont age like android batteries, mine is 12 years old on the iPhone 4 for example, i have plenty of other apple products i still use every day that all exceed 10 years age. thats absoluteley normal for apple products.
@gregorycarlson6445
@gregorycarlson6445 3 роки тому
In my engineering college, I had some professors who told the story of the old Bridgeport milling machines. They were built so sturdy and reliable that many still work perfectly today almost 80 years later. The machine never broke down or needed to be replaced, so the company started running out of paying customers. The intended takeaway from this story was to emphasize supposed importance of planned obsolescence, but that conclusion always bothered me. I saw a triumph of engineering and yet it was framed as a failure because someone couldn't make more money off of it.
@alexdavila1356
@alexdavila1356 3 роки тому
planned obsolesce is just a crutch for a bad business model. It is never a good thing when a competitor can offer your product that lasts on top of a differing business model that extends profits.
@dennisgonzales9521
@dennisgonzales9521 3 роки тому
Completely agree
@narsimhas1360
@narsimhas1360 3 роки тому
@מחמד חנזיר automation will change this dynamic though, otherwise I too support planned obsolescence
@danmerillat
@danmerillat 3 роки тому
@מחמד חנזיר by abandoning capitalism in favor of a system that isn't as ludicrously shortsighted.
@michaelkeaton5394
@michaelkeaton5394 3 роки тому
This is how people should think
@AdmiringObserverR
@AdmiringObserverR Місяць тому
The appeal of paying less but more often, as well as pushing new trends in styles, is how this has been so accepted by most people
@tropixi5336
@tropixi5336 8 місяців тому
happens all the time, always hear about all these things that were ment to last forever but now things barley last 3 days
@KougaJ7
@KougaJ7 3 роки тому
"Planned obsolescence" is *not* good for everyone. It's extremely unsustainable consumptionism.
@krupert8355
@krupert8355 3 роки тому
Unfortunately our entire economy is based on a constant flow of consumption. Generate your own power, collect your own water, grow your own food, and re pair your old items... and there is very little for you to contribute to economy. If everyone became independent this way, I don't see how the economy as we know it could survive. This kind of economy works for survival, quick growth, but not for long term. Survival is not the same as living. We will need to change the mechanism and philosophy of currency, economy and resources. The side effects though is product tech advancements would be slower, but they would matter less as well. Another side effect will be ecological and environmental as we become more careful and responsible with our resources.
@MarkWTK
@MarkWTK 3 роки тому
consumerism is the word you're looking for, I think 😅
@victorduvivier1062
@victorduvivier1062 3 роки тому
anyone*
@thewaytruthandlife
@thewaytruthandlife 3 роки тому
agreed... but how to solve it ?
@rd3k3k3k3
@rd3k3k3k3 3 роки тому
exactly and the argument that planned obsolescence is good because it provides jobs is stupid because nowadays most jobs are being automated anyway
@Winterydee
@Winterydee 3 місяці тому
I've had many an LED light bulb become a strobe light after 2 to 3 years... so about them lasting forever... I don't think so. Now that said, they are far more energy efficient and currently do tend to last longer than most old incandescent or florescent light bulbs.
@TUCOtheratt
@TUCOtheratt Місяць тому
Design obsolescence is theft. We have all have suffered from this crime. On a bright note, I still drive a Dodge Ram I bought new in 2008. 200K miles and 16 years.
@hoopoloatucd
@hoopoloatucd 3 роки тому
I'm so glad you included the Right to Repair discussion.
@mf--
@mf-- 3 роки тому
Wish he included Louis Rossmann.
@aMondayMorning
@aMondayMorning 3 роки тому
I don't like the word "discussion" when referring to right to repair. It should be factual with no abiguity.
@rlemoyne007
@rlemoyne007 3 роки тому
Tesla will have to provide information about its cars.
@DeadpoolJust
@DeadpoolJust 3 роки тому
@@mf-- I'm actually glad he wasn't included. It feels like there is more probability of a movement gaining long-term progress if it can't be taken down by discrediting 1 single individual. Think of it as diversification in investment.
@lonestarr1490
@lonestarr1490 3 роки тому
@@rlemoyne007 They already do so. Otherwise they wouldn't be able to acquire patents for it.
Why Some Designs Are Impossible to Improve: Quintessence
33:03
Design Theory
Переглядів 1,2 млн
Маленькая и средняя фанта
00:56
Multi DO Smile Russian
Переглядів 1,7 млн
How They Caught The Golden State Killer
27:12
Veritasium
Переглядів 7 млн
What The Ultimate Study On Happiness Reveals
23:26
Veritasium
Переглядів 4,2 млн
How Close We've Come to Nuclear War
16:46
Veritasium
Переглядів 2,9 млн
The Man Who Accidentally Killed The Most People In History
24:57
Veritasium
Переглядів 32 млн
Something Strange Happens When You Follow Einstein's Math
37:03
Veritasium
Переглядів 8 млн
How Do Night Vision Goggles Work? (There's 3 types)
27:16
Veritasium
Переглядів 4,8 млн
The Infinite Pattern That Never Repeats
21:12
Veritasium
Переглядів 20 млн
What Game Theory Reveals About Life, The Universe, and Everything
27:19
11 Of The Most Faked Foods In The World | Big Business | Insider Business
30:40