See how Watson won Jeopardy! and what it meant for the future of cognitive systems. www.research.ibm.com/cognitive...
КОМЕНТАРІ: 469
@krookyj7 років тому
Now we just need three Watsons to go up against each other.
@saskoilersfan6 років тому
And sherlock holmes to judge._.
@bigolejr4 роки тому
james how the fuck do i stumble upon u
@ryansykorabroadcast4 роки тому
Yoooo
@1.41424 роки тому
watson will win.
@jabobthegod3 роки тому
no let’s take Watson, Asimo by honda and a Boston dynamics robot
@heroeagleeye81418 років тому
lmao Ken's final answer "I for one welcome our new computer overlords"
@acecrowncat14393 роки тому
lol xd
@revinhatol3 роки тому
()
@rkr98613 роки тому
"What is Sauron" Nerdy developer sighs in relief. Of all the trivia questions out there, his coworkers would have really killed him if Watson got that one wrong.
@dx98679 місяців тому
this AI technology is invented by nerdy people aiming to win some sort of competition. Who cares about winning or losing a game? You won a competition and so what? How about do something real like inventing a better medicine to cure cancer and save lives?
@Gspeezy135 років тому
James holzhauer= Watson in human form
@Angultra5 років тому
We need a second showdown for sure
@jackbauer5555 років тому
watson 2.0 in human form
@GamingDrummer895 років тому
I wasn't too surprised to see James Holzhauer references when I stumbled across this video, hahaha!
Remember when you tried to kill me twice, oh how we laughed and laughed. Except I wasn't laughing
@king_supreme11025 років тому
C. McCoy exactly
@DavidMcCoul4 роки тому
Hal, OPEN THE POD BAY DOORS, HAL
@beerman94733 роки тому
Hey, Watson's cheating, he's Googling the answers!
@jetison3333 роки тому
Technicallu Watson was disconnected from the internet during this :)
@tiddlewiddle47843 роки тому
thats just not true
@beerman94733 роки тому
@@tiddlewiddle4784 It's a joke
@brownro2143 роки тому
How much mass storage did Watson bring to the game? Did the computer memory include the entire Wikipedia database?
@svensemet75683 роки тому
@@brownro214 I can recommend the full explanation here ukposts.info/have/v-deo/bKOnl3mBgWyUyqs.html
@gregstevens60873 роки тому
I think what people fail to realize about how impressive this actually is. Is not the fact that it's a computer that has all the data centralized on servers that it can access in milliseconds, so of course it would beat a human. It's the fact that it can parse and interpret language as a block of text and understand what it maps to (in terms of the answer).
@kerr2574Рік тому
hash
@troybombayРік тому
@@kerr2574 brown
@kyleadams84967 місяців тому
@@troybombaymama
@danzigvssartre4 місяці тому
You mean it can follow syntax? Follow syntax is all computers do.
@chris520004 роки тому
Am I the only one rooting for the humans?
@adamsrankings88603 роки тому
No
@dhansel48352 роки тому
That was 8 years ago. Just imagine the leaps in technology they have now. I would love to see a re-match.
@i-publishinghouseghana4327 місяців тому
ChatGPT changed everything!
@Quester2023-xp7rb3 місяці тому
gemini in samsung s24@@i-publishinghouseghana432
@wolverinefangowings3 роки тому
Ken Jennings out here accepting defeat with a Simpsons reference. What a freaking legend.
@firstname1570Рік тому
"I'm afraid I can't do that, Dave" We all know where this is going to end up 😂.
@Cest.La.Vie..Рік тому
Now here comes a new challenger - The ChatGPT4
@Cest.La.Vie..Рік тому
Watson vs. ChatGPT Or, Quantum vs. AI processors
@duncanatxtra4 місяці тому
ChatGPT4 is not a challenger to Watson for this use case.
@TristanTris321GoT4 роки тому
Watson’s creators in the audience cheered for it like it was there child at a little league game hitting a home run. Lots of insight there.., someday that child will grow up.
@sheldonjplanktonn5 місяців тому
And do what?
@jsamcМісяць тому
Don't be afraid of computers be afraid of the developers.🏴☠
@uncreative57663 роки тому
The greatest thing about Watson for me was just how much information IBM was able to upload into Watson's servers. I mean, there is a lot of history, politics, geography, literature, science, math, and pop culture, and IBM built an incredible machine.
@gurguri127 місяців тому
And that was back in 2011 with no Big data parsing advance techniques.
@lonewolfx4992 роки тому
The fact that they needed a computer to beat them just proves how good they are.
@mathbrah10 місяців тому
ye
@yvonamayvei92084 місяці тому
This! This is all I thought about when I watched this years ago when they said these two were going against IBM! I thought, these two have “terrorized” the BRAINIES world LMAO; that they thought, ok, let’s find a friggin’ computer to beat these two! _Honestly, my thoughts were Vice versa of the first IBM guy’s reaction. My first thought was that these two are very good but NO WAY in hell they’d ever answer anything faster than a computer. So I thought it was going to be an automatic WATSON 100%, Ritter 0%, Jennings 0%. Or maybe they’d get really lucky and maybe just sneak in one or two for a total of $200 a piece at most when all had been said and done. I was very shocked at how WELL THEY DID in comparison to what I was expecting! No doubt these guys are LEGENDS, some really smart dudes, almost out of this world smart._ Just think about it, these Nerds at IBM, these Algorithm Specialists, and all the mob are “cream of the crop” as you can imagine. (Within already smart people, picked for this task). Imagine them loosing sleep making this thing (you know they did lol), they were going to be damned if these two defeated WATSON. The point being, imagine these terribly smart I.T. guyz spending months upon months building something to defeat these two; so they must have been really smart for the whole IBM to agree to shut down one section of operation just to dedicate the funding of resources to create WATSON and pay a pretty penny to the Engineers behind it (as we can imagine). All in the name of trying to beat 2 supposedly really bright guys! _Yes, their investment was worth it in the end I guess to them, for trying to prove their point that they could create a computer that could defeat these two; but the bigger picture everyone outside of IBM folks is thinking, HOW SMART COULD YOU BE TO in a way “TERRORIZED” IBM lol, into a decision to dedicate millions of dollars on a project to try and prove such a point? You have got to be pretty DARN GOOD, pretty friggin’ SMART, ONE who by Golly, is only FOR THE RECORD BOOKS!_ JEEZ! To me, i can’t think there is a greater compliment to these two guyz than that. There are quite a number of people who have won lots of money on various game shows, obviously these two have stood out amongst the brainiacs of not only game shows but this show in particular. Must feel soooooooooo good to be them, WAW. Forever the smart Legends!
@BenjaminGoodman3 роки тому
Even tho Watson is outdated now, imagine if he went against James
@wazzup2332 роки тому
Watson vs James Holzhauer vs Matt Amodio (or Amy Schneider if she could beat Matt) would be the next match. 😁
@BenjaminGoodman2 роки тому
@@wazzup233 that’s be awesome to see if it was doable!
@jacobtapianieto96552 роки тому
Hosted by Ken Jennings
@salvadorromero9712Рік тому
@@wazzup233 Watson should just identify as human and enter regular, non-exhibition Jeopardy to beat Amy Schneider and take home the prize money.
@Atlastheyote2222 роки тому
I'm learning about that in my Data Science unit at University this year. You guys really broke new ground that people haven't stopped talking about since.
@robertli36004 роки тому
James Holzhauer: You dare oppose me mortal
@marcuswatson49104 роки тому
Lol that guy on the left seems so much cooler then you’d expect😂
@ninerushclips34146 місяців тому
Look at the state of AI now, wow.
@alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi37233 роки тому
Ken had wroten down on piece of paper "I for one welcome our new robot/computer overlord!"
@hatersgonnalovethis3 роки тому
classic Simpsons quote
@planck10-435 років тому
Don't forget Ken Jennings famous words, "I think we saw something important today..."
@RashmiPrabhu6 місяців тому
Technically a team of scientists are playing against actual players
@luciengrondin5802Рік тому
"Four letter words for a vantage point or belief. - What is a view?" I like how this first answer shows that Jeopardy is not just about knowledge. Everybody knows what a view is, but it takes a bit more than that to reckognize the definition and quickly come up with the corresponding word.
@thenicholas77804 роки тому
I find it a little weird that the audience is clapping for the computer.
@helck11533 роки тому
A lot of the audience was the people at IBM that worked on making the computer
@bispybristol3 роки тому
Tom Scott sent me here. 👍
@mav013 роки тому
same
@kurokhan282 дні тому
Imagine Watson now. It's been 10 years since this video came out.
@aranchilingar90867 місяців тому
At this moment the difference between the two individuals on the left, and the right of Watson are the neural pathways, and how long it takes for the electricity to reach a certain destination just like a freeway that was obstructed by an accident would have traffic, and would have to reroute in your neural pathways in your brain in your gray matter is the exact same. You can create a direct route by intention You just have to use electric ampacity .
@DavidMorseMusicРік тому
Should try this again with ChatGPT....
@AWBOfficial99410 місяців тому
Ken's final answer "I for one welcome our new computer overlords" 😂
@sega4481Рік тому
ChatGPT would destroy Watson
@tripfarmer95083 роки тому
Now you know how Garry Kasparov feels lol
@JoeThom8Рік тому
Brad really won $200k for losing. Honestly, not a bad wage for 2 days of playing Jeopardy.
@noahwilliams89968 років тому
I feel so proud of Watson! :'D And I didn't even have anything to do with him!
@knpstrr5 років тому
It is an it.
@kevingreen579311 місяців тому
They need to do this again this time with Jeopardy James! I wonder if Watson will have to go all in to beat James?
@5starryansl9 місяців тому
this was awesome
@raymondsalazar52912 роки тому
This was eight years ago I can only imagine what Watson is doing now
@Espirael4 роки тому
Ken: I am best at getting money James: Hold My Beer
@davidkopec94423 роки тому
Watson is ready to activate the Terminator Army soon.
@hikesystem77212 роки тому
If they game used a signaling device that was equal for all competitors, Ken probably would have won. Watson used direct signaling, while the humans had to go through a mechanical interface. They should have had Watson trigger a "finger" that activated the same device the other contestants used. I believe Watson won only because it had a signaling advantage.
@moatef18862 роки тому
I'm not even sure if this is true, but either way the result wouldn't change at all. I guarantee Watson is capable of reacting much faster than what is humanely possible, it would have buzzed via its "finger" essentially instantaneously (based on some flags in the algorithm, Watson evaluating how close it is to the answer, etc.).
@hikesystem77212 роки тому
@@moatef1886 ok, so it was a signaling competition.
@moatef18862 роки тому
@@hikesystem7721 What are you talking about? I'm disputing your misinformed claim that Watson would have lost if he used a "real signaling device" like the human players. This would not have made any impact, as I described above.
@hikesystem77212 роки тому
@@moatef1886 I understand. I accept your claim that Watson could trigger a mechanical finger faster then Ken. So then, this essentially makes the competition decided on signalling speed. If you removed the signaling from the equation, I believe Ken was superior at reasoning and answering questions. When Watson was asked what city had its largest airport was named after a WWII hero, and its second largest airport named after a WWII battle, it said "Toronto."
@moatef18862 роки тому
@@hikesystem7721 Your premise is correct but your conclusion is strange. Of course Ken could reason better than Watson, because any human can reason better than Watson. Watson doesn't reason. I'm not sure if you understand what about computer science makes Watson impressive at the time he was made
@SuperTylerMan113 роки тому
Awesome! Now do this with Jeoporady James
@mackenziewachter25082 роки тому
Well, IMO, IBM Watson's voice sounds very similar to a male Siri. But anyway, after seeing Jeopardy The Greatest of All Time 2 years ago, Ken Jennings was a legend when it comes to answers that are very easy. And even though Ken took place as host of the syndicated series (even though he went on hiatus for "months" after Mattea Roach's winning streak being broken and had Mayim Bialik host for the rest of the season until sometime before the finale), he's still a legendary Jeopardy contestant to this very day.
@jammesdean4 роки тому
James would crush that comp
@user-xx5fx6xh6c7 місяців тому
its amazing!!!!!!!!!
@walterfristoe46438 місяців тому
How did Watson press the buzzer? 🤔
@CharlesGurr3 місяці тому
James is so good he replaced AI in the greatest of all time 😂
@mariogamefreak15 років тому
I want ken vs jame vs Watson
@saskoilersfan6 років тому
The answer is " a raven has caws for thoughts, a writing Desk has cause for thoughts". I forget the question . Anybody know it. It drives me nuts not knowing and its right thurr._.I know its important and i dont know why._.
@eclatshwartzbaumcybertune20632 роки тому
I love this show - but i did not know about this - i heard about it in the Simpsons.
@nathan0401_3 роки тому
This is really cool
@skittlezbecrazy3 роки тому
When is the Watson vs James Holtzhauer matchup?
@akirahirata64863 роки тому
They look like proud dads 👍🏼
@gastonforde21213 роки тому
Rip Mr Trebek.
@AbnerBrijesh9 місяців тому
They should do this again with James and Mattea.
@ryansmith10444 місяці тому
With ChatGPT (or any modern AI) it would not be close. The humans would barely get any right.
@letsgoyankees26363 роки тому
Now IBM Watson gives us fantasy football trade analysis
@carlosduran91415 місяців тому
I've been saying that IBM has long a pioneer and a leader in the field of AI long before ChatGPT or any other,
@fujimatosaРік тому
Was it connected to the www during a game?
@Devillionaire4 роки тому
Awesome and all... but how're you gonna prevent this from becoming Skynet one day?
@greasyshoe3 роки тому
@@memenistan3438 they dont have to
@albertjackinson3 роки тому
You don't let Watson get taught by somebody who wants that to happen.
@lucariolps2772 роки тому
Watson isn't a aware ai or anything.. It Interprets Text..
@marksierra35222 роки тому
This took place 9 years ago... The future was here and it's the past now.
@luke_ario13137 років тому
Inb4 people notice that they used music that came from The Smash Brothers Documentary.
@MaxKoOfficielРік тому
The Future is not the future...
@ChristopherRubio-zl6tj10 місяців тому
We need to see James take on Watson
@TagSpamCop2 роки тому
My company put in Watson. It never worked right, we pulled it out a few years ago and we wrote our own Siri.
@teddymortensen2 місяці тому
good thing james wasnt there it would have been over
@playsaboutmycat2 місяці тому
The people, happy, clapping and cheering for Watson who has no emotion lol
@HomoVastans7 років тому
A:(In the form of a question) What is the T-800?
@HaroldDippРік тому
Woah 😮😮 you're telling me a computer is better at retaining information than humans
@aranchilingar9086Рік тому
What is a Akashik(phonetic pronunciation [Sanskrit]) record?
@user-uh4gm8ls8n11 місяців тому
back because of the progress of chatgpt
@prennt57g995 років тому
James and ken Vs Watson please
@nickprice89073 роки тому
I wonder how James Holzhauer would have done against Watson.
@hikesystem77212 роки тому
How much did IBM have to pay Jeopardy to get them to agree not to have equal, fair signaling systems for all 3 contestants?
@moatef18862 роки тому
I've responded to your comment above; you seem to think that this has any affect whatsoever on the outcome of the game. Like I stated above, Watson can react probably orders of magnitude faster than humans possibly can, provided it makes a decision to buzz in. It would do so perfectly every time without getting penalized, this isn't even remotely difficult compared to Watson actually giving the correct answers.
@Steveman275 місяців тому
They didn't even mention you here, yet you act like they did. If the whole point of the game was to show that no person had a chance against Watson in a Jeopardy game, then it wasn't a real competition to begin with.
@justinwilliam65342 роки тому
That machine is the inspiration for the villain Max Kilobyte in Scooby Doo and I don't trust artificial intelligence because some are being made to replace voice actors on the Simpsons and it could destroy the voice acting business for good.
@RashmiPrabhu6 місяців тому
I am here after reading a reference in Dan Brown's Origin
@patrikneumann257511 місяців тому
How do you think ChatGPT would fare ?
@BelindaWoodson-uc5is10 місяців тому
(GRAB IT ) CMI,Bell Ma,and T &At !
@rrhev3 роки тому
People don't realize that Watson's only true advantage was it's buzzer speed. Because it's a machine, it could transmit it's response much faster than the human finger tapping the signalling device. Kind of an unfair advantage.
@scottblish7662 роки тому
Absolutely, 100% correct. The most important factor in winning on Jeopardy is buzzer speed and timing - the contestant selection procedure weeds out people who don't know enough to be competitive on the show. Most of the contestants know most of the responses to most of the clues.
@peytonsmith9214 роки тому
Watson vs Holzhauer
@Cinnimin3 роки тому
watson will spend the 1mil on preserving his ancestors
@jorostuff4 роки тому
This machine (is it?), disconnected from any internet sources, managed to answer questions requiring high level intelligence to even understand.
@jimmysyar8893 роки тому
Yea
@Cheetah-tz3ut3 роки тому
u go watson
@mrnemo2042 роки тому
I literally know someone who worked on Watson
@killerbowser70465 років тому
James, ken, and watson please
@Swyzzl4 роки тому
We need a Watson vs James showdown
@phunkyphresh37993 роки тому
If Watson stomped years ago it’ll win every single question this time. Tech has advanced very fast
@guyvanburen5 років тому
Unfair comparison due to disparity in I/O bandwidth. Watson can (presumably) read the questions as text with super human speed, and click in with super human reaction time, whereas Ken is delayed in both. So it’s not a fair comparison of human to machine search capability. Deep blue was far more impressive.
@lucariolps277Рік тому
From how I understood, watson get the question as Text when the announcer read the question out loud. Watson would physically press the Button trough a pneumatic system. It would only press the Button once it was certain of it's answer. So it was pretty close often. There were a lot of Situations where the humans were faster.
@CarlosNievesGAMES2Рік тому
Never have I ever
@BobbyLCollins2 роки тому
At 2:40 look at Ken Jennings' answer.
@BLYFACTOR5 років тому
I want Ken vs Brad vs watson
@palletlover8519Рік тому
Watson is literally just looking up the answers
@andrewmorris785811 місяців тому
So why did he get some questions wrong?
@duncanatxtra4 місяці тому
Watson is not just looking up the answers. Watson first has to understand the answer and reason as to what the question would be. Watson is not just a super fast Google. How many searches would a human have to do on Google to come up with the correct question? Brad and Ken are very very impressive human beings. Watson showed that computer capability is progressing. I was actually there and in the theatre. What is not immediately obvious in the video is that Watson came up with three potential responses and rated its own responses ahead of pressing the buzzer. Having said all of that, it doesn't seem that we have new overlords. ChatGPT couldn't do what Watson is doing here. I don't think that computers are going to play quite the role that we thought they might. Unless of course we consciously become less focussed as humans on acquiring and retaining knowledge ourselves. And then it will become a self fulfilling prophecy.
@TommyLikeTom2 роки тому
it's kind of just a big advert for IBM
@giovannicervantes20533 роки тому
Rip alex
@malavery50172 роки тому
good for him!!!
@jsamcМісяць тому
Why were the humans so happy that a machine was defeating humans.
@wjadragon67822 роки тому
How spooky is that thing today?
@lflee10 років тому
What more can Watson do after these 2 years?
@ibmresearch10 років тому
Hi, you can read the details here, but Watson is helping in diagnosing cancer and helping chef's come up with new recipes. www-03.ibm.com/innovation/us/watson/
@insaneinside908 років тому
+IBM Research Is he Skynet yet?
@suejak18 років тому
+IBM Research Wait, IBM Research doesn't know how to use an apostrophe?
@lflee7 років тому
***** that would be great. I do think the stagnant state of modern material science scene is the bottleneck of our technological progress.
@thesenate55107 років тому
Watch Terminator, that will give you a good idea of what he'll do.
@marchpeacemarch3 місяці тому
Clicking in is 90% of the game when the players have comparable knowledge of the material. It is not surprising that a computer can click in faster than a human.
@lawrenceyjohn12402 роки тому
That one James guy never got to play this thing.
@oogrooq3 роки тому
What is Toronto?
@Matanumi6 років тому
where is wattson now?... how is it impacting lives? where would wattson fair in todays jeopardy?